CO2 Emissions and Vehicle Performance

Similar documents
Aerodynamic Drag Assessment

Vehicle Performance. Pierre Duysinx. Research Center in Sustainable Automotive Technologies of University of Liege Academic Year

ULSAB-AVC Program Targets

Energy Efficiency of Automobiles A Pragmatic View

The all-new BMW X4. Highlights.

State of the Art Development Methodologies for Hybrids and e- Drives

Study of Fuel Economy Standard and Testing Procedure for Motor Vehicles in Thailand

ŠKODA FABIA Petrol engines

2012 Audi Q5 2.0T. Technical specifications. Technical specifications Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI. Page 1 of 2 ENGINE:

ŠKODA SUPERB COMBI Petrol engines

ŠKODA KAROQ Petrol engines

ŠKODA KODIAQ SPORTLINE Petrol engines

ŠKODA OCTAVIA Petrol engines

Approach for determining WLTPbased targets for the EU CO 2 Regulation for Light Duty Vehicles

COST EFFICIENT COMPOSITE PLATFORM WITH INTEGRATED ENERGY STORAGE FOR A HYDRAULIC HYBRID

Green Manufacturing. with focus on the automobile. Lecture prepared with the able assistance of Nel Dutt, TA

DIESEL. 9-speed automatic transmission. Front Wheel Drive

AECC Clean Diesel Euro 6 Real Driving Emissions Project. AECC Technical Seminar on Real-Driving Emissions Brussels, 29 April 2015

77 th GRPE, 6-8 June 2018 Agenda item 13, HD FE Harmonization. OICA HD-FE TF Y. Takenaka

Flybrid mechanical kinetic energy

Introduction of measurement technics regarding mass emissions and real time fuel consumption using direct exhaust gas flow meter

Fuel Consumption Potential of Different Plugin Hybrid Vehicle Architectures in the European and American Contexts

Scientific expert workshop on CO2 emissions from light duty vehicle Lisbon 7-8 June Session 3: challenges of measuring real driving emissions

Support for the revision of the CO 2 Regulation for light duty vehicles

The Chances and Potentials for Low-Voltage Hybrid Solutions in Ultra-Light Vehicles

Diesel engines Bore Stroke [mm mm] Max. engine performance/revs [kw at rpm]

Optimum Matching of Electric Vehicle Powertrain

Engine encapsulation. A synergic approach to exterior noise and CO 2 emissions reduction. Brussels, 18th December 2012 Maurizio Mantovani - Autoneum

4-cyl. petrol engine TSI ACT BMT Effective displacement cm³ 1,395 Valves per cylinder 4. kw (PS) at rpm Nm at rpm

2019 LEXUS UX 200 SPECIFICATIONS

Curb Weights of HD Vehicles a study about possibilities to increase payload and reduce fuel consumption

Vehicle Dynamics and Control

ŠKODA SUPERB COMBI Diesel engines

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011 BMW i8 Concept Front Side View

Toyota s Hybrid Technology. Yoshihiro Onomura General Manager, Planning & Administration Dept. Hybrid Vehicle Engineering Management Div.

SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES THE CHANGING FACE OF MOBILITY.

R&D: FUTURE-PROOFING THE BMW GROUP. DR. HERBERT DIESS MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF MANAGEMENT OF BMW AG, DEVELOPMENT

Technical specifications 1.8 TSI/132 kw (A) 2.0 TDI/110 kw 2.0 TDI/110 kw (A) 2.0 TDI/135 kw (A) Engine

FE151 Aluminum Association Inc. Impact of Vehicle Weight Reduction on a Class 8 Truck for Fuel Economy Benefits

Early Stage Vehicle Concept Design with GT-SUITE

Toyota s View on the Future Powertrain

Proposal for WLTP Tabulated Load Coefficients. Thomas B. Wagner,

Toyota. Stephen Stacey - General Manager Arjan Dijkhuizen - Senior Engineer. Government & Technical Affairs Toyota Motor Europe TOYOTA MOTOR EUROPE

ŠKODA KODIAQ SCOUT Diesel engines

RDE PN emissions from a GDI vehicle without and with a GPF

ŠKODA KODIAQ Diesel engines

Grey Box System Identification of Bus Mass

Chapter 5. Regulations for the Diesel passenger car 전남대학교공과대학기계시스템공학부 최병철교수

Sulphur impact on exhaust emissions. 20.Dec.2016 JAMA fuels and lubricants committee

Real Driving Emissions (RDE) Introduction of new legislation in Europe. Boundary Conditions

International best practices in cutting transport s climate emissions. Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership 7 th Annual Conference

On the Role of Body-in-White Weight Reduction in the Attainment of the US EPA/NHTSA Fuel Economy Mandate

Transportation Energy Use in Cars 3: Rolling Resistance

NOx reduction effect on CO 2. NOX Reductions are achievable without significant penalties in CO 2

TRACK PREPARATION 2017 CAMARO MODELS 1. ATTAIN THE RIGHT MILEAGE 2. SEASON THE BRAKES NEW VEHICLE BREAK-IN BRAKE BURNISH PROCEDURE

Technical specifications 1.4 TSI/110 kw ACT TSI/206 kw 4 4 (A) 2.0 TDI/110 kw TDI/140 kw 4 4 (A) Engine

Aerodynamics and CFD at Volvo Car Corporation

Vehicle Simulation for Engine Calibration to Enhance RDE Performance

Progress at LAT. October 23, 2013 LABORATORY OF APPLIED THERMODYNAMICS

Energy savings by light-weighting Update

The Global Automotive Industry Challenges and Opportunities

JAGUAR XF SALOON AND XF SPORTBRAKE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FEBRUARY 2019

WLTP-DHC Validation Phase I

Vehicle Types and Dynamics Milos N. Mladenovic Assistant Professor Department of Built Environment

Aerodynamics and CFD at Volvo Car Corporation

Expected Light Duty Vehicle Emissions from Final Stages of Euro 6

ENERGY ANALYSIS OF A POWERTRAIN AND CHASSIS INTEGRATED SIMULATION ON A MILITARY DUTY CYCLE

Fuel Economy, ACEA 2016 and other challenges for European Passenger Car Oils Richard van den Bulk

IPRO Spring 2003 Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Simulation, Design, and Implementation

ŠKODA RAPID Diesel engines

March th session March 16 18, 2011, Ann Arbor, USA

Morgan launches limited-run Aero GT to celebrate the finale of the Aero Range

2014 Jetta Technical Specifications

A Detailed DOE Study for Concept Level Battery Electric Vehicle Energy Dimensioning

Headlight Test and Rating Protocol (Version I)

Volvo XC60. Ignition sequence Engine idling speed, rpm Fuel, rec. octane Max output, kw (hp)/rpm Max torque, Nm/rpm

Real Driving Emissions

Evaluation of exhaust emissions from three dieselhybrid. cars and simulation of after-treatment

Passenger Car-Related CO 2 a manufacturers view of progress

Explanation and Validation of the Flat Belt Method ENTWURF Fahrzeugtechnik Fahrleistung und Verbrauch EGNT/2

High performance and low CO 2 from a Flybrid mechanical kinetic energy recovery system

EU Projekt HySYS Fuel Cell Hybrid Vehicle System Component Development

Vehicle Summary. Adverse Data CAUTION. Plate Change. USED VEHICLES AutoCheck Report KP11VLT WVGZZZ7PZBD045248

Validation of a simulation model for the assessment of CO 2 emissions of passenger cars under real-world conditions

Effect of a Dual Loop Thermal Management Arrangement with a Single Module Radiator on Vehicle Power Consumption

Fuel consumption analysis of motor vehicle

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

FILED 07/16/2018 4:57 PM ARCHIVES DIVISION SECRETARY OF STATE & LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL

NORDIC VEHICLE CONFIGURATION FROM VIEWPOINT OF FUEL AND TRANSPORT ECONOMY, EMISSION REDUCTION AND ROAD WEAR IMPACT

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. MINI ONE CONVERTIBLE.

A study on aerodynamic drag of a semi-trailer truck

Influence of Ash-Forming Gasoline Additives such as MMT on Exhaust Emissions and Performance Characteristics of PC-Engines

EVOLUTION OF RDE REGULATION

messages displayed with extended idle operation

messages displayed with extended idle operation

ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

InCar the Modular Automotive Solution Kit

Study into Kinetic Energy Recovery Systems Optimisation

Transcription:

CO2 Emissions and Vehicle Performance CO2 emissions for the ULSAB-AVC Program were calculated using both the NEDC 2000 and the US Combined driving cycle requirements. 15.1 BACKGROUND The following vehicle performance targets as shown in Table 15.1-1 were set based on engineering judgement and to achieve the primary program objectives. Table 15.1-1 Main performances Main Performances C-Class PNGV-Class Acceleration 0-62 mph (0-100 km/h)/sec 14 14 Top Speed Continous / mph / km/h 100 / 160 100 / 160 CO 2 Emissions (g/km) 140 140 Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient (c w ) 0.25 0.25 15.2. Calculation of C0 2 Emissions For the calculation of CO 2 emissions, two procedures were applied. NEDC (New European Driving Cycle) 2000 requirement with the test mass defined as: Test mass = Vehicle curb weight + 100 kg A) Manual shift mode B) Automatic shift mode US Combined Driving Cycle (FTP 75, Highway) with the test mass defined as: Test mass = Vehicle curb weight + 300 lb. Page 1

For the calculation of CO 2 emissions, the following formula applies for vehicles with semi-automatic transmission (manual and automatic shift mode possibilities). CO 2 emissions US Comb. manual + US Comb. auto. = US Combined 2 US Comb. manual = CO 2 emissions US Combined manual shift mode US Comb. auto. = CO 2 emissions US Combined automatic shift mode 15.3. Calculation of Vehicle Acceleration For the calculation of the vehicle acceleration, the vehicle mass is calculated according to DIN 70020 (3) where the driving performances are calculated with the following vehicle mass. Vehicle Mass = Vehicle Curb Weight + (Payload / 2) For each vehicle C-Class and PNGV-Class variant, this procedure was used for calculation of vehicle performance and to determine the gear ratios to achieve the 14 sec. target for acceleration (0-100 km/h). Page 2

15.4. Calculation Parameters 15.4.1. General Table 15.4.1-1 General calculation parameters General Calculation Parameters C-Class PNGV-Class Gasoline Diesel Gasoline Diesel Curb Weight (according to DIN Leer) [kg] 933 966 998 1031 Maximum Payload [kg] 450 500 Calculated Test Mass (emissions) NEDC 2000 [kg] 1035 1065 1100 1130 Calculated Test Mass (emissions) US Combined [kg] 994 1024 1059 1089 Calculated Test Mass (acceleration) 0-62 mph/100 km/h [kg] 1160 1190 1250 1280 Vehicle Frontal Surface Area [m2] 2.03 2.03 2.03 2.03 Dynamic Roll Radius (tire) [m] 0.275 0.275 0.275 0.275 Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Rolling Resistance Coefficient 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Transmission Efficiency Coefficient 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 15.4.2. Engine Parameters For the CO 2 emissions calculation, the engine characteristics (e.g. power and torque), shown in Table 8.5.1-1 and fuel specifications were used. Gasoline has an average fuel density of 0.756 kg/l (at 15 degrees Celsius). Gasoline specification is according to: UTG 96 (US), premium unleaded fuel octane rating (antiknock index) of 93 ((R+M)/2) method, EU 3RF (Europe), super unleaded fuel with ROZ minimum 95 Diesel fuel has an average density of 0.84 kg/l (at 15 degrees Celsius). 15.4.3. Transmission Parameters In the calculation, the program adjusts either automatically or offers the possibility for manually adjusting the gear spread ratio to achieve the desired results for acceleration time (0-100 km) or CO 2 emissions under the given boundary conditions of engine characteristics and vehicle mass. The transmission characteristics for the C-Class and PNGV-Class for an aerodynamic drag coefficient of 0.25 can be found in Tables 15.4.3-1 and 15.4.3-2. Page 3

Table 15.4.3-1 Transmission characteristics - C-Class C-Class Gasoline C-Class Diesel Transmission Total Ratio Single Ratio Total Ratio Single Ratio Gear 1 12.444 3.111 13.296 3.324 Gear 2 7.2 1.8 5.596 1.399 Gear 3 5.068 1.267 3.544 0.886 Gear 4 3.908 0.977 2.592 0.648 Gear 5 3.18 0.795 2.044 0.511 Primary Transmission 1:4 1:4 Final Drive 1:1 1:1 Table 15.4.3-2 Transmission characteristics - PNGV-Class PNGV-Class Gasoline PNGV-Class Diesel Transmission Total Ratio Single Ratio Total Ratio Single Ratio Gear 1 13.272 3.318 13.836 3.459 Gear 2 7.172 1.793 6.148 1.537 Gear 3 4.916 1.229 3.952 0.988 Gear 4 3.74 0.935 2.912 0.728 Gear 5 3.004 0.751 2.308 0.577 Primary Transmission Final Drive 1:4 1:1 1:4 1:1 Page 4

15.5. C-Class Vehicle CO 2 Emissions Calculation Results Figure 15.5-1 C-Class NEDC 2000 - CO 2 emissions over aerodynamic drag coefficient range Table 15.5-1 C-Class NEDC 2000 CO 2 emissions summary C-Class Results Manual shift mode Automatic shift mode Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient c w = 0.25 Gasoline Diesel Gasoline Diesel CO 2 emissions (NEDC 2000) [g/km] 127 102 106 86 Fuel Consumption (NEDC 2000) [L/100 km] 5.3 3.8 4.4 3.2 Page 5

Figure 15.5-2 C-Class US Combined - C0 2 emissions over aerodynamic drag coefficient range Table 15.5-2 C-Class US Combined - CO 2 emissions summary C-Class Results Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient c w = 0.25 CO 2 emissions (US Combined) [g/km] 105 86 Fuel Consumption (US Combined) [mpg] 53.4 72.7 Table 15.5-3 C-Class performances summary C-Class Performances Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient c w = 0.25 Gasoline Gasoline Diesel Diesel Acceleration (0-100 km/h) (0-62 mph) [sec] 13.5 13.4 Intermediate acceleration (80-120 km/h) [sec] 17.9 16.8 Top speed continuous [km/h] 194 184 Page 6

15.6. PNGV-Class Vehicle CO 2 Emissions Calculation Results Figure 15.6-1 PNGV-Class NEDC 2000 - C0 2 emissions over aerodynamic drag coefficient range Table 15.6-1 PNGV-Class NEDC 2000 CO 2 emissions summary PNGV-Class Results Manual shift mode Automatic shift mode Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient c w = 0.25 Gasoline Diesel Gasoline Diesel CO 2 emissions (NEDC 2000) [g/km] 130 106 108 89 Fuel Consumption (NEDC 2000) [L/100 km] 5.4 4.0 4.5 3.4 Page 7

Figure 15.6-2 PNGV-Class US Combined - CO 2 emissions over aerodynamic drag coefficient range Table 15.6-2 PNGV-Class US Combined CO 2 emissions summary PNGV-Class Results Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient c w = 0.25 CO 2 emissions (US Combined) [g/km] 108 92 Fuel Consumption (US Combined) [mpg] 52.4 68.0 Table 15.6-3 PNGV-Class performances summary PNGV-Class Performances Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient c w = 0.25 Gasoline Gasoline Diesel Diesel Acceleration (0-100 km/h) (0-62 mph) 13.9 13.9 Intermediate acceleration (80-120 km/h) 18.0 17.4 Top speed continuous [km/h] 193 184 Page 8

15.7. Other Exhaust Emissions As noted in Chapter 2, the achievement of the EU4 Exhaust Emissions targets by 2005 are dependent upon developments being undertaken by automotive companies and their suppliers. The results achieved by the ULSAB-AVC Program provide an excellent basis for such related developments. Page 9