Qualcomm Stadium Redevelopment

Similar documents
APPENDIX VMT Evaluation

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Green Line Long-Term Investments

APPLICATION OF A PARCEL-BASED SUSTAINABILITY TOOL TO ANALYZE GHG EMISSIONS

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

Otay Ranch Station 2020 MOBILITY SERVICES MAP REGIONAL MOBILITY HUB IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

SANDAG 3D Visualization Howard Blackson 6:15. Sub Area A Coalition Massing/Phasing - Mike Labarre 6:30

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

DEVELOPMENT OF RIDERSHIP FORECASTS FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT STUDY

TransNet Dollars Keep San Diego Moving

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Welcome. Please Sign In

Travel Forecasting Methodology

WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION. Final Smart Growth Evaluation Report

West Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

4.1 Land Use. SECTION CONTENTS Land Use Transit Transportation Technology

Yonge-Eglinton. Mobility Hub Profile. September 19, 2012 YONGE- EGLINTON

This letter provides SPUR s comments on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/ Subsequent Environmental Impact Report.

The Millenia Town Center consists of a ±12.58 acre portion of the ±210 acre. The Millenia Town Center is currently planned to include two projects

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Fresno County. Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Public Workshop

Address Land Use Approximate GSF

Transportation Statistical Data Development Report BAY COUNTY 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street

Mountain Area Transportation Study Model Methodology and Assumptions Final

Appendix B: Travel Demand Forecasts July 2017

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 26, 2017

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX H. Transportation Impact Study

The $600 Million Rebirth of San Diego Trolley

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Parking Management Element

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

Chapter 9 Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH

Making Mobility Better, Together

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Appendix F Model Development Report

Equitable transit-oriented development: Tools + Tactics

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

San Rafael Civic Center Station Area Plan May 2012 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 661 BEAR VALLEY. Escondido, California September 1, LLG Ref

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

APPENDICES. Appendix R Traffic Impact Analysis (January 2017)

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

Downtown Lee s Summit Parking Study

Transit and Job Growth: Lessons for SB 375. Jed Kolko Public Policy Institute of California

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WESTMINSTER SEMINARY. Escondido, California June 25, LLG Ref Transportation Engineer II

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

Unified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

3.1 Introduction Transportation Elements and Study Area Meeting the Need for the Project

ATTACHMENT [B] PROJECT DESCRIPTION REQUESTED CITY OF LOS ANGELES ACTIONS

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 INTRODUCTION...3 PROJECTED FUTURE GROWTH...3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...4 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES...

FOR SALE OR FOR LEASE SALE PRICE: $2,000, & 2950 Garnet Avenue

ITEM 9 Information October 19, Briefing on the Performance Analysis of the Draft 2016 CLRP Amendment

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

LEED v4 Building Design and Construction Quiz #3 LT

Town of Londonderry, New Hampshire NH Route 28 Western Segment Traffic Impact Fee Methodology

Needs and Community Characteristics

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

Site Traffic Studies:

Metra Milwaukee District West Line Transit-Friendly Development Plan

San Francisco Transportation Plan Update

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

Green Line Extension to Torrance Supplemental Alternatives Analysis. 2. Purpose and Need 2. PURPOSE AND NEED

CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 III. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PROCEDURE... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 APPENDIX B...

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Chevy Chase Lake. Preliminary Plan # B TRAFFIC STATEMENT. Prepared for: Chevy Chase Land Company & Bozzuto Development Company

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Transit in Bay Area Blueprint

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

Navigating in Different Rivers

Costco Gasoline Fuel Station Transportation Characteristics

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

Trip Generation and Parking Study New Californian Apartments, Berkeley

August 2, 2010 Public Meeting

Transcription:

Qualcomm Stadium Redevelopment Executive Summary In May 2017, SANDAG s Service Bureau was asked by two separate entities 1 to forecast how proposed mixed-use development of the approximately 166-acre SDCCU Stadium site 2 (including the stadium, parking lot, and practice field) would affect the amount of travel to, from, and within the proposed site. To achieve this goal, the hiring entities agreed on the following assumptions: By 2035, the redevelopment area would include a total of 4,800 residential units, 450 hotel rooms, 70.4 acres allocated as follows; stadium/arena (13%), recreational (72%), and park use (15%). The development also would include 3.14 million square feet of non-residential space allocated as; scientific research and development (9%), commercial (24%), and office (68%) use. This mix of development equates to 9,089 residents living on the site and 10,480 jobs. For size comparison purposes, in 2017, the 361-acre Liberty Station includes around one-quarter of the number of housing units, one-quarter the number of employees, and three-quarters the number of hotel rooms 3. There are two measures of total travel for the site. The first is Average Daily Traffic (ADT) which measures the total number of (personal and commercial) vehicles projected to travel into and out of the site on an average weekday. The second is the number of Person Trips (PT) 4 which represents the number of individuals who are traveling to, from, or within the site for personal reasons, either by motor vehicle (as the driver or passenger in a carpool), transit, walking, or biking. Specific findings based on the assumptions outlined above and other agreed upon model details outlined in this report include the following 5 : The model estimates that, based on the assumptions stated above, there will be approximately 97,000 ADT to/from the proposed site on an average weekday basis. This figure includes residents and their visitors, site employees, individuals frequenting 1 Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) representing FS Investors and Urban System Associates, Inc. (USA), representing Public Land, Public Vote. 2 Qualcomm stadium site statistics according to https://www.sandiego.gov/stadium/about/factguide on November 15, 2017 3 Statistics downloaded on October 26, 2017 from http://retailinsite.net/downloads/pointloma_libertystationeast.pdf and confirmed with SANDAG s land use database, EDD employment figures, and the hotel websites. Housing units at Liberty Station consist of 850 military units and 350 residential units. 4 A person trip is any non-commercial trip made by an individual. For example, if 3 people drive together to a store that would equal 3 person trips and 1 vehicle trip. 5 The estimates provided here were created using the SANDAG Activity-Based Model (ABM version 13.3.2). Additional information regarding the assumptions (including land use improvements), the model, and disclaimers regarding its use can be found in the full report. 4 Transit Hubs are stops where passengers can change modes of transportation, such as the Old Town Station, where passengers can transfer from the Trolley to a bus to continue their trip.

commercial locations, hotel visitors, and those seeking to use the recreational areas, as well as commercial vehicles servicing the residents and businesses at the site. The model also estimates there will be approximately 123,000 PTs on an average weekday basis, with approximately three-quarters (77%) of these trips occurring in a motor vehicle. It is estimated that the average number of miles a resident at the site will travel by vehicle per day will be 9.9, which is below what the average is forecast to be for the region s residents overall (15.5), and the City of San Diego s residents (13.5). The existing Qualcomm Stadium Green Line Transit Station on the site is estimated to have 5,100 individuals getting on or off at this stop daily by 2035 the highest number of the stops on the line with the exception of transit hubs 6. Due to the diversity and density of the proposed land use at the site, the model estimates that 17 percent of the 123,000 PTs associated with the development would be made by active transportation (i.e., walking and biking). This percentage is higher than the 2035 estimate for the percent of PTs that are expected to be made via active transportation for both the City of San Diego overall (14%) and the San Diego region (13%). 6 Transit Hubs are stops where passengers can change modes of transportation, such as the Old Town Station, where passengers can transfer from the Trolley to a bus to continue their trip.

Introduction Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) representing FS Investors and Urban Systems Associates, Inc (USA) representing Public Land, Public Vote hired SANDAG Service Bureau to forecast how proposed mixed-use development of the approximately 166-acre SDCCU Stadium site (including the stadium, parking lot, and practice field) would affect the amount of travel to, from, and within the proposed site. This document outlines the land use assumptions and the transportation network modifications used for the project and the transportation model results. 2035 Land Use Assumptions and Network Modifications Agreed-upon Land Use Assumptions The Service Bureau project request entailed replacing existing land use in the study area (Master Geographic Reference Areas (MGRAs) 6163 and 6165) with an agreed upon land use alternative consisting of the following assumptions. Table 1: 2035 Proposed Site Land Use LAND USE TYPE UNITS Multi-Family Dwelling Units 4,800 Hotel (Low Rise) Rooms 150 Hotel (Low Rise) Square Feet 160,710 Hotel (High Rise) Rooms 300 Hotel (High Rise) Square Feet 300,000 Scientific Research & Square Feet 275,000 Development Regional Commercial Square Feet 500,000 Specialty Commercial Square Feet 240,000 Office (High Rise) Square Feet 1,190,000 Office (Low Rise) Square Feet 935,000 Stadium or Arena Acres 9.0 Other Recreation - High Acres 12.0 Other Recreation Low Acres 38.5 Active Park Acres 10.9 The land use assumptions were converted into site population and site employment for input into the SANDAG Activity-Based Model (ABM version 13.3.2). Table 2: 2035 Site Full Buildout Population and Employment MGRA Site Population Site Employment 6163 4,018 6,009 6165 5,071 4,471 Total 9,089 10,480

The 2035 proposed development increases the Mission Valley Community Planning Area (CPA, 2035 forecast) population from 34,282 to 43,371 for an increase of 26.5 percent. Dwelling units for the Mission Valley CPA increased from 19,299 to 24,099 for an increase of 24.9 percent. Agreed-upon Transportation Network Modifications In addition to the agreed upon land use changes, FS Investors and Public Land, Public Vote also agreed to the following modifications to the City of San Diego Circulation Element and SANDAG s 2035 Revenue Constrained Regional Plan network: 1. Added Access Roads for the Site a. West access driveway at Friars Rd, included adding a signal b. Extension of Mission Village at San Diego Mission Rd, included adding a signal c. East access driveway at San Diego Mission Rd, included adding a signal d. Extension of Rancho Mission Rd at Ward Rd, included adding a signal 2. Included Friars Rd improvements from Fashion Valley Mall to Frazee Rd 3. Removed Friars Rd and SR 163 SB and NB Interchange Improvements 4. Removed Phyllis Place connection to Via Alta 5. Removed Santo Rd connection between Aero Dr and Friars Rd 6. Removed Tierrasanta Rd connection between Santo Rd and Mission Gorge Rd 7. Included Hazard Center extension as a two-lane collector under SR 163 from Hazard Center Dr to Riverwalk Dr. 8. Removed Fenton Pkwy connection between Northside Dr and Camino Del Rio N 9. Removed Purple trolley line SANDAG modeling staff made the following adjustments to the ABM inputs and networks to account for the unique characteristics of the development: 1. Work location choice pre-process was run to update the development site. 2. Active Transportation networks were updated within the site to reflect proposed development walk and bike connectivity to transit stops and surrounding community. Transit access walk times were reviewed for both MGRA zones. MGRA zone connectors for walk access were adjusted accordingly. 3. Density parameters were adjusted to reflect the proposed density and diversity of land uses at the development site. To understand the size of the development we compared the development and input data to other areas within San Diego County. The proposed 2035 site population of 9,089 people is approximately 67 percent of the 2016 estimated population of the City of Solana Beach (13,500) The proposed 2035 site dwelling units of 4,800 is approximately 19 percent of the 2016 estimated dwelling units of downtown San Diego (25,337) The proposed 2035 site commercial gross leasable area (ft 2 ) of 740,000 is roughly 13 percent larger than Otay Ranch Town Center (655,000)

The proposed 2035 site office space is equivalent to 4.5x the size of the Wells Fargo Office Tower in downtown San Diego (472,000) The proposed 2035 site employment of 10,480 is 34 percent of Qualcomm s San Diego employment (30,500) The proposed 2035 site includes 16,000 parking spaces which is 3,000 less than the existing SDCCU Stadium site Due to the alterations to the land use and network, this scenario is not directly comparable to the 2035 Regional Plan adopted by SANDAG board. 2035 Proposed Site Forecast Results The 2035 proposed land use inputs, network changes, and model adjustments were evaluated using the SANDAG Activity-Based Model. The diversity of land uses, density of activity generators, walkable street network, and proximity to an existing Green Line Trolley stop site results in trip making with relatively high amounts of transit usage, active transport trips, and internal capture. This section discusses the forecast results for the proposed development site. Average Daily Traffic and Personal Trips There are two measures of total travel for the site. The first is the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) which is the total number of vehicles (personal and commercial) projected to travel into and out of the site on an average weekday. The model forecasts 97,000 ADT to/from the proposed site on an average weekday basis in 2035. This ADT includes residents and their visitors, site employees, individuals frequenting commercial locations for shopping, dining, or entertainment, hotel visitors, and those seeking to use the recreational areas, as well as commercial vehicles servicing the residents and businesses at the site. Commercial vehicle trips could be by auto, light-duty, or heavy-duty trucks. Commercial trips include deliveries to the site such as mail, packages, products to stores, supplies to offices, and furniture/moving services, business trips to the site such as business meetings, and service visits such as landscapers, plumbers, electricians, and janitors/housekeepers. There are four roadway entrances to the site with the majority of trips entering from the northern boundary of the site (87%). The second primary measure from the transportation model is the number of Person Trips (PTs) which represents of the number of individuals who are traveling to or from the site for personal reasons, either by motor vehicle (as the driver or passenger), transit, walking, or biking. The model also estimates there will be 123,000 PTs on an average weekday basis. Approximately three-quarters (77.3%) of these trips are forecasted to occur in a motor vehicle (single and high occupancy vehicles, not including commercial travel).

Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) for the site is well below regional and City of San Diego averages for residents and employees as shown in Table 3. VMT per resident measures the total amount of driving made by people that live in the specified area. VMT per employee measures the total amount of driving made by employees who work in the specified area. Table 3: Daily Weekday VMT Comparison Area VMT per Resident VMT per Employee Region 15.5 23.1 City of San Diego 13.5 22.3 Site 9.9 18.4 Transit The site has access to an existing Green Line Trolley stop. The site also has access to two other nearby transit stations, Mission San Diego and Fenton Parkway, each of which is roughly a half mile from the Qualcomm Stadium Transit Stop. There is also a local bus stop for future route #648 near San Diego Mission Rd. and Friars Rd. The 2035 forecast for the proposed site shows roughly 5,100 boardings and alightings to the Green Line Trolley at Qualcomm Stadium. This is 1,000 more than the 2012 boardings at Fashion Valley Transit Center. As shown in the figure below, the Qualcomm Stadium station (in red) in 2035 becomes the largest nontransit center trolley boarding stop along the Green Line (transit centers are shown in orange). Mission San Diego is listed as a transit center due to transfers between the Green Line trolley and a future BRT route at the stop. Overall, a daily 5.1 percent transit share of person trips and a peak period work commute share of 11.2 percent is forecasted for the site.

SDSU TC OLD TOWN TC EL CAJON TC 12TH & IMPERIAL TC MISSION SAN DIEGO TC QUALCOMM STADIUM FASHION VALLEY TC GRANTVILLE MISSION VALLEY CTR GROSSMONT CENTER SANTEE TOWN CENTER HAZARD CENTER RIO VISTA MORENA/LINDA VISTA ALVARADO MED CENTER FENTON PARKWAY 70TH STREET ARNELE AVENUE SANTA FE DEPOT COUNTY CENTER WASHINGTON ST AMAYA DRIVE GILLESPIE FIELD GASLAMP QUARTER FUTURE RIVERWALK SEAPORT VILLAGE CONVENTION CENTER MIDDLETOWN Figure 1: 2035 Green Line Boardings and Alightings 2035 Green Line Boardings and Alightings 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 - Active Transportation Overall, a daily 16.9 percent of person trips to/from or within the site will either walk or bike to their destination. 5.6 percent of peak period commute trips to/from or within the site also will be made by walking or biking. Internal Capture Internal capture rates are often used to demonstrate the diversity of land uses in a mixed-use development. The forecast for this site is for 1 in 10 (10.2%) of all trips and just over 1 in 5 (21.9%) of resident trips generated at the site will remain on the site. Mode Share Comparison Table 4 and Table 5 show the mode shares for the region, City of San Diego, and the proposed development site from the 2035 land use and network scenario tested. Transit and active transportation percentages at the proposed site are considerably higher than the region or City of San Diego. Table 4: 2035 Daily Person Trip Mode Shares Mode San Diego Region City of San Diego Qualcomm Stadium Site Auto 81.6% 80.3% 77.3% Transit 3.2% 4.1% 5.1% Bike & Walk 13.3% 13.9% 16.9%

Table 5: 2035 Peak Period Person Trip Commute Mode Shares Mode San Diego Region City of San Diego Qualcomm Stadium Site Auto 92.7% 91.7% 83.2% Transit 5.2% 6.1% 11.2% Bike & Walk 2.2% 2.2% 5.6%

Forecast Disclaimers Series 13 Travel Demand Model Disclosure Statement This notice is intended to help users understand the limitations of the Series 13 Transportation Demand Model. It is the responsibility of the users to independently evaluate the content and usefulness of the information, given the limitations stated below. The SANDAG Series 13 Travel Demand Model is based on an activity based model (ABM) platform. The ABM has a base year of 2012 and a horizon year of 2050. The ABM was developed using travel behavior information from the 2006 San Diego Household Travel Behavior Survey, data from the American Community Survey, U.S. Census Bureau, and the most current traffic and transit observations available through 2014. The model is calibrated and validated to 2012 travel conditions using observed traffic counts for freeways, arterials, and transit ridership. Many of the Series 13 Transportation Demand Model inputs such as population, households, jobs, and income are derived from the Series 13 Regional Growth Forecast. Future year transportation scenarios in the Series 13 Transportation Demand Model are derived from policy and investment decisions made by the SANDAG Board of Directors in San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan. SANDAG does not endorse policies or investment scenarios that deviate from the Regional Plan. While care is taken to ensure the information in the transportation model and growth forecast is accurate and current, the science and knowledge upon which they are based are dynamic, and the data upon which they rely continually evolve. Therefore, there is no guarantee given by SANDAG that the information provided by the transportation model and growth forecast is correct, complete, and/or upto-date with conditions in the region, or the current state of scientific opinion or analysis, or as to its acceptability by any third party. Any action taken upon this information is strictly at the practitioners own risk, and SANDAG will not be liable for any losses or damages in connection with using these data. Project Specific Disclosures While travel demand in the ABM is accounted for in a highly disaggregated spatial and temporal process, the model is not capable of accounting for many design characteristics of a site such as proximity of residential dwelling units to retail outlets or the convenience of bike parking to building entrances. Distance to transit is calculated from a zone centroid to the trolley stop rather than from each individual building and unit leading to some bias of walk travel times. The ABM does not explicitly account for the home location selection bias for residents whose personal characteristics may align with choices available in the development. Additionally, the ABM parking model is applied only to the downtown area. For any study sites outside downtown, including this one, the model treats these sites as nonparking constrained area with free parking and enough parking spaces. SANDAG Service Bureau renders no opinion on whether this site conforms to transit oriented design or climate action plan planning standards.

The model run requested is for an average weekday and does not include trips for special events on the site such as soccer matches.

Appendix Forecast Results Statistical Summary for the Proposed Site ACTIVITY Population 9,089 Employment 10,480 TRIPS Person Trips 123,256 Vehicle Trips (ADT) 96,766 DAILY MODE SHARE (ALL TRIPS) Transit 5.1% Walk 16.0% Bike 0.9% Auto 77.3% Other 0.7% PEAK PERIOD MODE SHARE (COMMUTE TRIPS) Transit 11.2% Walk 3.8% Bike 1.8% Auto 83.2% DAILY SITE (QUALCOMM STADIUM) GREEN LINE BOARDING S and ALIGHTING S Boarding s 2,606 Alighting s 2,522 INTERNAL CAPTURE All Trips 10.2% Site Residents 21.9% VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL VMT per Site Capita 9.9 VMT per Site Employee 18.4 AVERAGE TRIP LENGTH Site Residents 4.1 Site Employees 7.1 All Trips 6.0