TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT HARVINGTON PT1 (CREST HILL)

Similar documents
BUS SERVICES IN CHAMBERLAYNE ROAD NW10

Traffic Monitoring Report 2016

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

Dropped Crossing Service

Traffic Monitoring Report 2017

Request for a Weight Restriction on the A515 from Stubbins Lane (Draycott in the Clay) through Yoxall, and Kings Bromley to Wood End Lane.

Traffic Engineering Study

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Project : A Prepared by: Jack Wellings / Andrew Hughes. Client: Wembdon Parish Council Approved by: Philip Weatherhead

Trip Generation and Parking Study New Californian Apartments, Berkeley

Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 8 Passenger Transport Improvements

THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO

Baddow Road Bus Gate Frequently Asked Questions May 2018

ONE YEAR ON: THE IMPACTS OF THE LONDON CONGESTION CHARGING SCHEME ON VEHICLE EMISSIONS

M6 TOLL TRAFFIC MONITORING STUDY

WATFORD LOCAL PLAN PART 2. Review of Car Parking Policy and Standards. Evidence Base. February 2012

Trip Generation Study: Provo Assisted Living Facility Land Use Code: 254

Introduction and Background Study Purpose

Findings from the Limassol SUMP study

FINAL REPORT TO SHEFFIELD BUS PARTNERSHIP OPERATIONS GROUP FROM: WORK PACKAGE 5 PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK & UPDATE DATE OF MEETING: 19 OCTOBER 2012

Appendix I: Parking Assessments

DRIVER SPEED COMPLIANCE WITHIN SCHOOL ZONES AND EFFECTS OF 40 PAINTED SPEED LIMIT ON DRIVER SPEED BEHAVIOURS Tony Radalj Main Roads Western Australia

Direct Tel: +44 (0) T +44 (0) F +44 (0) E

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Part A: Introduction

Memorandum. To: Sue Polka, City Engineer, City of Arden Hills. From: Sean Delmore, PE, PTOE. Date: June 21, 2017

Alberta Speeding Convictions and Collisions Involving Unsafe Speed

Residential Development Bearna Engineering Services Report

Sacred Heart Primary School Traffic & Parking Safety Guide

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

Rookery South Resource Recovery Facility (RRF) Community Liaison Panel Transport Presentation 22 nd February 2010.

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT MOUNT EDEN ROAD, MOUNT EDEN

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Mercer Island Town Center Parking Study Joint Commission Presentation March 16, 2016

PS 127 Abnormal / Indivisible Loads Policy

Post Opening Project Evaluation. M6 Toll

National Household Travel Survey Add-On Use in the Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area

Code of Practice v1.8. For the use by buses and coaches of the University of Bath

Table 8-1: Service Frequencies for All Short-List Alternatives by Day of Week and Time of Day Frequency Day of Week Time of Day Time Period

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

Downtown Lee s Summit Parking Study

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

The following section summarises the present conditions related to transportation for the proposed development of the Matimba B Power Station:

Public Transport Proposals including: Subsidised Bus Services, Concessionary Travel and Community Transport Draft Passenger Transport Strategy 2016

Civil parking enforcement in Cambridgeshire Don t get a parking ticket!

PROPOSED TRAFFIC RESOLUTION

Transport Group Perspective Chris Blow Chair of The Guildford Society Transport Group 21st Jan 2015

APPENDIX 7.1 Annex E. South Kyle Wind Farm Abnormal Load Traffic Management Plan VATTENFALL

2.1 Outline of Person Trip Survey

Guide to Parking Restrictions and Enforcement in Cambridge

SECTION 12: TRAFFIC. For inspection purposes only.

Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 12 Parking Restrictions

R O A D S A F E T Y E D U C A T I O N

NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #1 Open BLPC Meeting January 9, 2013

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Service and Operations Planning for Ottawa s New Light Rail Line Pat Scrimgeour

BUS STOP DESIGN & PLANNING GUIDE

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

PROPOSED TRAFFIC RESOLUTION

Traffic Management Plan and Queuing Analysis Lakehill Preparatory School Z Hillside Drive, Dallas, TX October 27, 2015

6. Strategic Screenlines

BETHLEHEM MISSIONS TRUST CAMPUS

Chicago Transit Authority Service Standards and Policies

Click to edit Master title style

Husky Stadium: TMP Modernization Project

Wilsons Auctions PROPOSED VEHICLE STORAGE COMPOUND, QUEENSFERRY, FLINTSHIRE. Transport Assessment VN60593

Traffic Research & Data Center

Public Opinion of Waterloo Region Rapid Transit Proposal May 2011

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

Cuadrilla. Roseacre Wood. Transport Consultation Report

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Chapter 11 Route Window NE10 Gidea Park station. Transport for London

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

East Stockton Boulevard (South Sacramento) Costco Gasoline Expansion Fuel Station Expansion Trip Generation Estimate

When is the Chester Bus Interchange due to be handed over from the contractor to Cheshire West and Chester Council?

MOBILITY SCOOTER SAFETY GUIDE

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

54 Parkway Drive, Rosedale Proposed Residential / Commercial Development. Transportation Assessment Report. 30 April 2018

Draft Marrickville Car Share Policy 2014

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Introduction

IRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

Appendix C. Traffic Study

committee report General Permitted Development Order SPT response to consultation

FINAL REPORT AP STATISTICS CLASS DIESEL TRUCK COUNT PROJECT

Onward travel. Insights from HS2 online panel

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS

Proposed Inn at Bellefield Traffic Impact Assessment

Transcription:

TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT HARVINGTON PT1 ( HILL) October 20-24th 2014 Conducted voluntarily by the residents of Harvington Village. This report has been prepared in light of the planning application W14/01788/OU Crest Hill. Traffic Survey Report Harvington (Part One) relates to the Crest Hill aspect of the vehicular traffic survey. Some of data for Village Street (Part two) is used for comparison however full breakdown figures shall be revealed in Village Street (Part Two) following the anticipated planning application for 200 Dwellings south of Village Street. Paul Waite & Mike Barbour 26/10/2014

TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT HARVINGTON PT1 ( HILL) October 20-24th 2014 The manual traffic survey was conducted at two sites in Harvington Village from 20-24th October 2014. The traffic count sites were situated at the Harvington crossroads with B4088 (fig.1) and at the Crest Hill Junction with Harvington Lane (fig.2). Fig.1 Village Street Fig.2 Crest Hill The Survey was conducted over the following time periods and dissected into 30 minute periods as follows: AM Count PM Count 0700-0730 1430-1500 0730-0800 1500-1530 0800-0830 1530-1600 0830-0900 1600-1630 0900-0930 1630-1700 Objective No.3 To ascertain the current village use of sustainable transport. 0930-1000 1700-1730 1730-1800 1800-1830 The traffic count periods were carefully selected to ascertain the known peak timings of traffic flow through the village. 2

Objectives The objectives of the survey were to determine the following: 1) The traffic flow through the village at peak times. 2) Village use of sustainable modes of transport. 3) Reliability of public transport. 4) The difference in vehicular traffic between school days and non-school days affecting the village. Traffic Flow Summary The total vehicular count for the 5 day survey was 19,022 vehicle movements which break down as follows: Total Traffic Flow for the period 20-24 th October 2014 Morning Count Afternoon Count Totals Crest Hill 1653 1826 3479 Village Street 6120 9423 15543 19022 Crest Hill Peak Traffic Flow Times: In the morning, peak flow in Crest Hill was between 8.30 and 9.00hrs. This is coincident with school and pre-school timings. The total vehicular movements during this period were 435 which equates to 2.9 vehicles per minute over the period. In the evening, peak flow times on Crest Hill was between 1700-1730. Total movements of 259 equating to 1.73 vehicles per minute over the period. 3

Overall Crest Hill Statistics HILL HILL TOTAL FLOWS AVERAGE DAILY FLOW av.flow /min. 07.00-07.30 210 42.00 1.40 07.30-08.00 272 54.40 1.81 08.00-08.30 303 60.60 2.02 08.30-09.00 435 87.00 2.90 09.00-09.30 222 44.40 1.48 09.30-10.00 211 42.20 1.41 TOTAL A.M. 1653 330.60 14.30-15.00 208 41.60 1.39 15.00-15.30 244 48.80 1.63 15.30-16.00 195 39.00 1.30 16.00-16.30 221 44.20 1.47 16.30-17.00 233 46.60 1.55 17.00-17.30 259 51.80 1.73 17.30-18.00 234 46.80 1.56 18.00-18.30 232 46.40 1.55 TOTAL P.M. 1826 365.20 O/A TOTAL 3479 695.80 4

OVERALL SITE TOTALS HILL TO NORTON EXIT VILLAGE HILL TO P. EX NORTON ENTER VILLAGE EX PRIORS TOTALS DAY 1 179 256 62 206 703 DAY2 199 254 54 199 706 DAY 3 187 276 70 195 728 DAY 4 180 267 48 236 731 DAY 5 159 220 42 190 611 TOTAL 904 1273 276 1026 3479 O/A VEHICLE TYPE DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5 TOTAL PEDAL/MOTOR CYCLES 16 0 11 5 3 35 CARS /TAXIS incl. MINI BUS 533 603 596 588 466 2786 LGV 122 73 86 105 105 491 HGV 1 2 3 4 7 13 29 HGV 2 2 0 0 0 1 3 PSV 27 27 26 26 23 129 AGRIC. VEHICLE 1 0 5 0 0 6 TOTAL 703 706 728 731 611 3479 Observations Affecting Crest Hill Flow of Traffic. > On Day 2, frequent morning precipitation occurred resulting in a spike of Car usage and drop in Pedal/Motorcycle usage. > Days 1-4, during the morning peak time, vehicular parking outside Harvington First School stretched 200m either side of the school which incorporates a blind corner. Parked traffic extended to within 150m of the junction with Crest Hill at the Coach & Horses Public House. > There were over 4500 vehicle movements in and out of Village Street (from Crest Hill and Harvington Cross) during the 5 days which compounds the traffic congestion at the school in particular where between 35 (Friday) and 50 (Monday-Thursday) vehicles have been recorded with up to 400 metres of parked cars. 5

Photographs taken 0850hrs on Friday 20 th October 2014 > On Day 5, Prince Henry s High School was already closed for half-term which resulted in a reduction of vehicular traffic. > On Day 5, Pedestrian footfall at Harvington First School increased significantly with less cars parked in the vicinity of the school. Households with children in Harvington First AND Prince Henry s using vehicular transportation for drop-offs predominantly opted to walk. Sustainable Transport In light of promoting sustainable transport as part of the National Planning Policy Framework, usage of public transport and cycles were counted and assessed. Cycle movement around working pattern times and school times was deemed to be low with only 35 cycle movements counted at Crest Hill, most of which were motorcycles. This accounts for less than 1% of the total traffic count. There were 125 Public Service buses operated by Warwickshire Stagecoach Ltd. The number 28/28A route serves the Stratford Upon Avon to Evesham Town route. The timetable is restrictive with a schedule that captures 11 hours per day and varies in frequency from every 30 minutes to hourly. As this is a Warwickshire Bus company service, savings on saver tickets are difficult to achieve as Harvington is within the county of Worcestershire. This renders this use of transport as expensive and in peak times, average use was less than 10 people. 6

BUS TIMES DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5 EX STRATFORD 7.13 7.12 7.18 7.12 7.14 7.12 8.03 8.04 8.04 8.06 8.01 8.16 8.38 8.36 8.36 8.41 8.42 8.38 9.28 9.30 9.29 9.30 9.35 9.37 9.58 xx 9.58 xx xx xx 14.28 xx 14.36 14.28 14.28 14.32 14.58 14.59 15.00 14.56 15.01 15.07 15.28 15.31 15.30 15.32 15.38 15.32 16.08 16.15 16.11 16.14 16.22 16.06 16.38 16.43 16.39 16.43 16.51 16.33 17.08 17.10 17.06 17.06 17.12 17.27 17.38 17.43 17.38 17.42 17.41 17.43 18.08 18.17 18.06 18.09 18.15 18.31 Number of Buses 65 Number outside of Charter 28 43.07% BUS TIMES DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5 EX EVESHAM 7.31 7.31 7.30 7.40 7.31 7.34 7.57 7.59 8.11 8.05 8.06 7.59 8.56 9.05 8.58 9.00 8.57 8.38 9.36 9.40 9.36 9.39 9.40 9.33 14.46 14.55 14.45 14.48 14.47 14.47 15.16 15.20 15.30 15.16 15.23 15.18 15.56 16.00 16.04 16.01 16.00 16.16 16.26 16.30 16.28 16.30 16.29 16.44 16.56 17.15 17.06 17.04 17.13 17.13 17.26 17.36 17.26 17.29 17.43 17.44 17.56 17.58 17.54 18.00 18.15 18.23 18.26 18.27 18.26 18.29 xx 18.31 Evesham Buses 60 Outside Charter 23 38.33% Overall Figures Number of Buses 125 Number Outside of Charter 51 40.80% 7

Stagecoach operate a charter that states that Our punctuality target is that 95% of scheduled journeys will run no more than five minutes late or one minute early. For the assessed period, the punctuality target was 59.2%. The amount of buses that operated outside of the charter was 51 of the 125 counted (40.8%) with 10% over 25minutes late or did not appear at all. Taking into consideration cost, Worcestershire/Warwickshire border issues and the punctuality, it is understandable why the bus service was infrequently used or relied upon. Traffic Forecast Punctuality of the bus service against the passenger charter is 59.2% In an attempt to comprehend the traffic impact of planning application W/14/01788/OU and the outlined plan for 85 new dwellings on Crest Hill, a similar new dwellings site was assessed. Poppy Fields was originally advertised as an extension to Lavender Fields in Evesham, constructed by Taylor Wimpey Homes. The site consisted of 1,2,3,4 bedroom houses (95 in total) over a larger area than proposed for Crest Hill. At 11pm on Monday 20 th October, the traffic count of parked cars on the estate was 141. At 11am on Tuesday 21 st October, the traffic count of parked cars on the estate was 37. This would indicate a conservative (and at worst case) traffic movement of 104 cars from the quiet period to post morning rush hour. This does not take into consideration repeat journeys or drop-offs, nor does it include PSV and LGV movements. It is our estimate that 85 new dwellings on Crest Hill will generate an extra 25-35% vehicular traffic during the periods similar to those assessed within this survey. Summary The traffic survey at Crest Hill has highlighted that there are predictable movements of vehicular traffic which are characteristic of a category 2 village with this demographic. Traffic patterns indicate that cars are the overwhelming mode of transport. Motorcycles and cycles are somewhat under-utilised. Public transport has punctuality issues and is also under-utilised. Not mentioned within the report until now, speed of traffic on Crest Hill is a concern as vehicles are perceived to be travelling at speeds in excess of the speed limit. Although no speed recording equipment have been used for this survey, speed concerns are well documented within the Parish Council minutes over the last 3-4 years and many checks have proved an issue exists. This is a highway safety concern. An extra 85 dwellings within the immediate vicinity of Crest Hill will have a negative impact on this road in terms of Increased vehicular traffic, increased CO2 emissions, an increased risk to highway safety, an increased congestion problem at school times on Village Street. The proposed site is clearly not regarded as a sustainable location due to the lack of sustainable modes of transport. 8

Appendices: A) Crest Hill Sample Page B) Notes to Recorders C) Guide to vehicle classifications 9

Appendix A Crest Hill Sample Page DAY 1 0700-0730 EXIT VILLAGE ENTER VILLAGE Total EX NORTON P. EX NORTON PRIORS PEDAL/MOTOR CYCLES 0 1 0 0 1 CARS /TAXIS incl. MINI BUS 11 26 1 2 40 LGV 1 3 0 0 4 HGV 1 0 0 0 0 0 HGV 2 0 0 0 0 0 PSV 1 0 1 0 2 AGRIC. VEHICLE 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 13 30 2 2 47 DAY 1 0730-0800 EXIT VILLAGE NORTON ENTER VILLAGE P. EX NORTON EX PRIORS PEDAL/MOTOR CYCLES 0 0 0 0 0 CARS /TAXIS incl. MINI BUS 11 22 3 3 39 LGV 2 2 1 0 5 HGV 1 0 0 0 0 0 HGV 2 0 1 0 0 1 PSV 0 0 1 0 1 AGRIC. VEHICLE 0 0 TOTAL 13 25 5 3 46 10

DAY 1 0800-0830 EXIT VILLAGE NORTON ENTER VILLAGE P. EX NORTON EX PRIORS PEDAL/MOTOR CYCLES 0 0 0 0 0 CARS /TAXIS incl. MINI BUS 3 36 1 7 47 LGV 4 1 1 1 7 HGV 1 0 0 0 0 0 HGV 2 0 0 0 0 0 PSV 2 0 0 0 2 AGRIC. VEHICLE 1 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 10 37 2 8 57 DAY 1 0830-0900 EXIT VILLAGE NORTON ENTER VILLAGE P. EX NORTON EX PRIORS PEDAL/MOTOR CYCLES 0 1 2 0 3 CARS /TAXIS incl. MINI BUS 31 29 2 5 67 LGV 10 9 2 0 21 HGV 1 0 0 0 0 0 HGV 2 0 0 0 0 0 PSV 1 0 1 0 2 AGRIC. VEHICLE 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 42 39 7 5 93 11

DAY 1 0900-0930 EXIT VILLAGE NORTON ENTER VILLAGE P. EX NORTON EX PRIORS PEDAL/MOTOR CYCLES 0 0 0 0 0 CARS /TAXIS incl. MINI BUS 6 18 2 10 36 LGV 2 0 1 1 4 HGV 1 0 0 0 0 0 HGV 2 0 0 0 0 0 PSV 0 0 0 0 0 AGRIC. VEHICLE 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 8 18 3 11 40 DAY 1 0930-1000 EXIT VILLAGE NORTON ENTER VILLAGE P. EX NORTON EX PRIORS PEDAL/MOTOR CYCLES 0 1 1 1 3 CARS /TAXIS incl. MINI BUS 12 11 4 5 32 LGV 0 1 0 2 3 HGV 1 0 0 0 0 0 HGV 2 0 0 0 0 0 PSV 1 0 1 0 2 AGRIC. VEHICLE 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 13 13 6 8 40 A.M. TOTALS 99 162 25 37 323 12

Appendix B Notes for Recorders NOTES FOR RECORDERS 1. Please turn up at least 5 minutes before your allotted time so you can be updated by the previous Recorder. 2. Recording can be from your car if preferred, but please park well off the carriageway: Crest Hill Recorders should be based on the wide verge just below the entry to Jack Straw ; X-roads Recorders should find space on the verge on the left just entering Leys Road. 3. Pencils, rubbers, record sheets and clipboards will be provided, you will need to be dressed suitably for the weather and also carry a watch or other means of telling the time accurately. 4. All entries should be made clearly in pencil 5. Enter date and start time on every sheet used 6. Use a fresh sheet for each ½ hour period if there is no space left for entries during a busy period start a new sheet and always add date and time again 7. Use the gate method to record vehicle movements in blocks of 5 i.e. 8. SAFETY Your personal safety, as well as that other road users is paramount, be aware you are working close to fast moving traffic, park all vehicles safely off the carriageway and do not cause obstructions, when on foot remain in the pedestrian areas where possible and be visible to other road users. Do not be a distraction to drivers 13

Appendix C Vehicle Classifications 14