Lower tether anchorages

Similar documents
Introduction of Booster Cushions in R129

Draft Deliberative Document

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.2/Amend.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.2/Amend.2

ECE Regulation N th session of GRSP December Informal document GRSP (54 th GRSP, December 2013, agenda item 19)

Economic and Social Council

ECE Regulation N th session of GRSP December 2013

Economic and Social Council

Proposal for the 02 series of amendments to Phase 2 of Regulation No. 129 (Enhanced Child Restraint Systems)

ECE Regulation N th session of GRSP May Informal document GRSP Rev.1 (55 th GRSP, May 2013, agenda item 18)

(Revision 2, including the amendments which entered into force on 16 October 1995) 01 series of amendments Date of entry into force: 9 February 2017

Proposal. Submitted. agenda item 17) supersedes made 2017/04/19) Insert new. of the. The minimum size area." Insert new. inform the.

Vehicle LATCH Hardware Evaluation Protocol (Version I) June 2015

Side Impact and Ease of Use Comparison between ISOFIX and LATCH. CLEPA Presentation to GRSP, Informal Document GRSP Geneva, May 2004

Vehicle LATCH Hardware Evaluation Protocol (Version II) November 2015

OBLIGATION TO FIT ISOFIX ANCHORAGES. (Discussion paper)

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION

Proposal for a new Regulation on Child Restraints Systems Phase 2

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION

Draft new Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of enhanced Child Restraint Systems used onboard of motor vehicles

Side impact protection in non-integral CRS First feedback on 440 mm. 52 nd Meeting of the UN Informal Group on Child Restraint Systems

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.1/Amend.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.1/Amend.2

Tel. :

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.43/Rev.3-E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.43/Rev.3

The European consumer voice in standardisation. Future Child Restraint Systems in Cars. Ronald Vroman 19 September 2018

Proposal for the 02 series of amendments to Phase 2 of Regulation No. 129 (Enhanced Child Restraint Systems)

TRL s Child Seat Rating, (TCSR) Front Impact Testing Specification

54 rd Meeting Informal Group on Child Restraint Systems Booster Seat Width Development. 27 th October2015

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Wheelchair seating Part 4: Seating systems for use in motor vehicles

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.1 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.1

Korea s Policy towards Vehicle Safety Standards Harmonization

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.43/Rev.3/Amend.7 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.43/Rev.3/Amend.7

ANCAP Assessment Protocol. Child Occupant Protection v7.2a

Economic and Social Council

Technical Bulletin. Important! C of 17. LATCH System Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren, Installing/Retrofitting

Nissan NP300 Navara 78% 79% 78% 68% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Pick-up. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

LATIN AMERICAN & CARIBBEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Latin NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION

Proposal for 10 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17 (Strength of seat)

Child safety CHILD SEATS. General safety information

CODE 10 OECD STANDARD CODE FOR THE OFFICIAL TESTING OF FALLING OBJECT PROTECTIVE STRUCTURES ON AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY TRACTORS

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP)

EEVC Report to EC DG Enterprise Regarding the Revision of the Frontal and Side Impact Directives January 2000

ASEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (ASEAN NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL AND BIOMECHANICAL LIMITS

Renault Kadjar 81% 89% 74% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Off-Road. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 225 CHILD RESTRAINT ANCHORAGE SYSTEMS LOWER AND TETHER ANCHORAGES

Hyundai Tucson 85% 86% 71% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Off-Road. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

FMVSS/CMVSR Compliance

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION

Kia Sportage 83% 90% 66% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Off-Road. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

SECOND ROW SEAT BELT SECOND ROW SEAT BELT. Second Row Seat Belt SB-13 EXPLODED VIEW SEAT BELT RETRACTOR < REMOVAL AND INSTALLATION >

Kia Optima 86% 89% 67% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Freedman Seating Company Getting you there safely! CASTA Conference 2017

I. Road Safety Targets and Indicators. II. Follow-up. III. Proposal. Note by the secretariat

Proposal of amendments to gtr 9 (Pedestrian safety)

Kia Niro 80% 83% 57% 59% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Mazda MX-5 84% 80% 64% 93% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Fiat 500X 85% 86% 74% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small MPV. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Volvo XC40 87% 97% 71% 76% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Kia Sportage 83% 90% 71% 66% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Off-Road. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Kia Optima 86% 89% 71% 67% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Audi TT SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION

REGULATION No. 94 (Frontal collision) Proposal for draft amendments. Proposal submitted by France

Draft for comments only Not to be cited as East African Standard

Renault Talisman 84% 86% 68% 76% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

CONVERTIBLE CAR SEAT ISOFIX COMPATIBLE Birth to 4 years (approx)

Informal Document N 20 (30th GRSP, 3-6 December 2001, agenda item 1.4) Insert in the "CONTENTS" the headlines of new annexes 10 & 11 to read:

Honda Jazz 85% 93% 73% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

This document is a preview generated by EVS

IWG TYREGTR 17 th Meeting* Brussels, ETRTO Office, 2-3 November 2017 Report of the Chair

Transport Canada. Child Occupant Protection Research. Considerations for Future Regulations. Suzanne Tylko Chief of Crashworthiness Research

Hyundai i20 73% 85% 79% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Proposal for the 09 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17

Audi TT 68% 81% 64% 82% SPECIFICATION ADVANCED REWARDS TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Pedestrian.

FIAT Panda 45% 16% 47% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant.

Pupil Transportation Safety

CEN TC256 WG01 PROGRESS: SHARING LATEST PROGRESS ON THE WORK DONE BY CEN TC256 WG01 ON THE EUROPEAN STANDARD EN45545

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.15/Rev.9 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.15/Rev.9

Kia Niro 80% 91% 70% 81% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. With Safety Pack. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

CASPER. Car-to-CRS Interface. EPOCh and CASPER Workshop March 13 th -15. Berlin, Germany CHILD ADVANCED SAFETY PROJECT FOR EUROPEAN ROADS.

SAFETY EQUIPMENT (NEXT)

Mazda 2 78% 86% 84% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Keywords: wheelchair base frames, frontal-impact crashworthiness, crash testing, wheelchair transportation safety, surrogate seating system

Opel/Vauxhall Vivaro SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Business and Family Van. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear

The UNECE World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29)

Adult Occupant. Pedestrian

Lateral Protection Device

Opel/Vauxhall Astra 84% 86% 83% 75% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Suggested Administrative Procedure to Deliver Supported Program Feature. Community- driven Program

Citroën Berlingo 91% 81% 68% 58% SPECIFICATION TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Vulnerable Road Users

VW Touran 89% 88% 71% 76% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small MPV. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Economic and Social Council

Citroën C3 Aircross 82% 85% 64% 60% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant.

REARWARD-FACING USER MANUAL ECE R GROUP WEIGHT AGE 0+/ kg 6m-4y

Ford Fiesta 84% 87% 64% 60% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION. Version 1.4 February 2018

ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2014/10

Renault Trafic 91% 52% 53% 57% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Business and Family Van. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Simulation and Validation of FMVSS 207/210 Using LS-DYNA

Adult Occupant. Pedestrian

VW Arteon 85% 96% 85% 82% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.

Transcription:

Lower tether anchorages Status of the development of a standard F.Bendjellal on behalf of ISO LTA task force 1 Lower tether anchorages - Status of the development of a standard

Table of content» What lower tethers and their anchorages are?» ISO resolutions regarding lower tether anchorages» Historical references and state of the art» Why lower tethers anchorages are needed?» Establishing of a draft standard in ISO LTA task force» Next steps 2 Lower tether anchorages - Status of the development of a standard

What lower tethers and their anchorages are?» Lower tether (LT): Type of anti-rotation device intended to limit the rearward rotation of a rearward-facing CRS. It usually comprises a tether strap or other hardware attached near the back or base of the CRS that connects to a lower tether anchorage. It incorporates a device to enable it to be connected to such an anchorage.» Lower tether anchorage (LTA): Figure 1 - RWF CRS using lower tethers An anchorage located on the vehicle floor (on the seat track or in the vicinity of the seat track) to which a lower tether can be attached. Figure 2 - Example of LTA s 3 Lower tether anchorages - Status of the development of a standard

ISO Resolutions regarding Lower tether anchorages» Resolution 344 Project lead With reference to WG 2 resolution 336, and noting that the work on LTA was now registered as a preliminary work item, WG 2 confirmed Farid Bendjellal to lead the work on this part. Experts interested in participating in the LTA work are asked to contact the WG 2 secretary (peter.claeson@sis.se).» Resolution 345 Further work on ISO/WD 13216-4 Reviewing the latest draft (N 1160), WG 2 agreed with the general approach for the specifications. The following items are suggested for the next version: - Review the introduction to explain the objectives; - Further work is needed to determine the reference point of the LTA zones. Preferably we should apply an established method (e.g. the determination of the support leg zone in UN R129); - The LTA zones proposed (Figures 1, 2a and 2b) should be checked by vehicle manufacturers within WG 2. Feedback should be sent to Farid Bendjellal (farid.bendjellal@britax.com) and the secretary (peter.claeson@sis.se); - Strength requirements: The method should be further explored, e.g. application of the FMVSS 225, AS/NZ 1754 and ADR standards used for top tether strength testing; - A test run by Britax (rear impact UN R44 with P6, no rebound bar) suggests that we may need to raise the strength requirements; - Visibility, marking, easy access and potential aggressiveness of anchorages should be considered. It is intended to hold a WebEx meeting in the near future. 4 Lower tether anchorages - Status of the development of a standard

ISO 13216 Four parts of this standard ISO 13216-1: Seat bight anchorages and attachments (ISOFIX) Defines a direct connection between the vehicle structure and a child restraint system. It comprises the configuration of the attachments at the CRS and the anchorages on the vehicle as well as their positioning. This standard is state of the art and is included in UN ECE R14 (Seat belt anchorages) as well as in both European CRS regulations (UN ECE R44 & UN ECE R129) ISO 13216-3: Classification of child restraint dimensions and vehicle space A classification system is provided which makes it possible to assess if a CRS of a specific type fit into a specific vehicle. This standard is state of the art and is included in UN ECE R16 (Seat belts) ISO 13216-2: Top tether anchorages and attachments Complements the ISOFIX requirements with the definition of the anchorages and attachments of the top tether as one of the possible antirotation devices to be used with ISOFIX. This standard is state of the art and is included in UN ECE R14 (Seat belt anchorages) as well as in both European CRS regulations (UN ECE R44 & UN ECE R129) DRAFT - ISO/WD 13216-4: Lower tether anchorages Defines anchorages at the vehicle which are specifically designed accommodate lower tethers. This standard is planned to be included to UN ECE R14 on a voluntary basis to include a consistent standard for lower tether anchorages. 5 Lower tether anchorages - Status of the development of a standard

Historical references of lower tethers» Rearward facing CRS s are available on the market since the late 1960 s. In Scandinavian countries they are mainly used for children up to a age of about 4 years.» Most of the larger rearward facing CRS s use lower tethers to secure the CRS in specific situations. This is an attachment method used for more than 40 years for example in Sweden.» Lower tethers limit the CRS displacement in case of a rear impact and also minimize the rebound of such a seat in case of a frontal impact.» The lower tether anchorages are located in front of the used seating positions and are comparable to the known top tether anchorages.» Lower tethers are only an additional installation feature and intended to be used together with the vehicle belt and a support leg. Figure 3 Installation of a RWF CRS using lower tethers 6 Lower tether anchorages - Status of the development of a standard

Currently used methods to attach lower tethers to the vehicle» Some vehicle manufacturers already provide LTA that are mostly located on the rails of the front seat. (Figure 2 on slide 3)» Most cars don t provide LTA. In that case the lower tethers are attached to the seatback of the front seat. (Figure 4)» There is a potential risk of misuse installations and/or interaction with vehicle components located on (or under) the vehicle seat. (Figure 5)» To improve the use of such seats and minimize the potential risks highlighted above a standard to define LTA s is needed. Figure 4 Example of installation LT s routed through the seat back Figure 5 Example for wire routing at a front vehicle seat 7 Lower tether anchorages - Status of the development of a standard

Implementing lower tethers & anchorages in regulations R129 & RXX (R14) 1. Starting point: ISO work as described in WD 13216-4 2017 2. In R129 define the lower tethers and how they are attached to the CRS and to the vehicle. 3. In R14 (XX) establish the location of the lower tether anchorages in the vehicle and the corresponding strength requirements. Video 1 Example of a rear impact test accrding to R44 with a RWF CRS using LT s 8 Lower tether anchorages - Status of the development of a standard

Positioning of lower tether anchorages ISO/WD 13216-4:2017(E)» A zone was defined within which the two lower tether anchorages for the respective seating position need to be located in. LTA zone side view Figure 6 - Front seating position Figure 7 - Rear seating position Key 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle seat illustration (seating positions) ISO/R2 envelope installed in related vehicle seating position Reference point on ISO/R2 envelope for LTA zone measurements Foremost seat cushion reference point Lower tether anchorage zone in side view, with upper limitation All dimensions in mm 9 Lower tether anchorages - Status of the development of a standard

Positioning of lower tether anchorages ISO/WD 13216-4:2017(E) LTA zone, top view: Key 1 2 3 4 5 Lower tether anchorage zone, top view Support leg zone (to be avoided) ISO/R2 envelope installed in related vehicle seating position Centerline of ISO/R2 and ISOFIX anchorage positions Lower tether anchorage, example positions Figure 8 - Front and rear passenger seating position All dimensions in mm 10 Lower tether anchorages - Status of the development of a standard

Positioning of lower tether anchorages Apart from being located in this zone the following specifications also need to be fulfilled:» A reference point for measurements is obtained by installing the ISO/R2 envelope (or physical fixture) in the vehicle seat; (Key 3 in upper figure)» The distance between both LTA s of the respective seating position shall be at least [280mm].» Both LTA s do not need to be positioned symmetrically with respect to the centerline through the envelop/fixture, however: Rear seating position Both LTA s shall not positioned on the same side of the centerline Offset of centerline between the anchorages and the envelope/fixture shall not be more than [200mm]» The zone intended for support legs shall not be used for lower tether anchorages. (Key 2 in the lower figure )» Lower tethers can interact with vehicle interior, but its function or that of vehicle components shall not be affect. Front and rear passenger seating position 11 Lower tether anchorages - Status of the development of a standard

Lower tether anchorage dimensions» Lower tether anchorages shall have an open and clearance space to allow the attachment of the standard top tether connector (Figure 8, ISO 13216-2) Figure 9 Top tether connector (hook type) dimensions» If a anchorage is intended to be used for two adjacent CRS positions the opening and clearance space shall allow the simultaneous attachment with two standard top tether connectors. 12 Lower tether anchorages - Status of the development of a standard

Strength test method» All interior components shall be assembled for the test» Adjustable seats shall be positioned in a middle position (as defined for )» A force of [2500 N] shall be applied to every LTA by means of a representative lower tether strap» To anchorages which are designed to be used for two adjacent CRS positions the double force of [5000 N] shall be applied.» The direction of the force is defined through two points: A Force Direction Reference Point (Key 3 in figure 10) including a tolerance of [± 20 mm] in all directions The LTA position (Key 4 in figure 10)» The force shall be attained within [30] s with a rate of not more than [135 000] N/s and shall be maintained for at least [1] s. Key 1 Vehicle seat illustration 2 Figure 10 - Test force direction ISO/R2 envelope installed in related vehicle seating position 3 Force Direction Reference Point (FDRP) 4 Example of actual LTA position in vehicle 5 Test force direction Vehicle floor Note: Lateral position of FDRP is coincident w centerline of ISO/R2 envelope. 13 Lower tether anchorages - Status of the development of a standard

Strength requirements When tested according to the test method previously described the excursion shall be limited to [XX mm] and permanent deformation including partial rupture or breakage of a lower tether anchorage, or surrounding area shall not constitute failure if the required force is sustained for the specified time. Next steps» Implement definition and requirements for lower tethers in R129-03 series of amendments ( ref CLEPA proposal XXX (Okke draft)» Implement definition of lower tether anchorages and associated requirements in R14 or [XX] in coordination with car manufacturers 14 Lower tether anchorages - Status of the development of a standard