TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

Similar documents
Applicable California Vehicle Code Sections, 2015 Edition

Evaluation of Request to Establish 15 MPH Speed Limits on Streets around Schools

Engineering and Traffic Survey

Assistant General Manager

ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC COMMITTEE. Speed Limit. Sellas Road North/Sellas Road South; Ladera Ranch; TB 952-F1. Traffic Engineering.

CITY OF POWAY MEMORANDUM

DATE: August 13, 2013 AGENDA ITEM # 8. City Council. Cedric Novenario, Transportation Manager RECOMMENDATION:

Establishing Realistic Speed Limits

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO STAFF REPORT. January 5, 2016

85th. HB 87 vs 85 Percentile Speed

traversing them. Speed dips may be installed in lieu of speed humps where the 85 th percentile speed on a street is at least 36 mph.

POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION. Effective Date: July 10, 2013

CITY OF GILROY 2012 SPEED SURVEY

Traffic Regulations Guidelines

Chapter 17 TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES. Adoption of Uniform Rules of the Road. Temporary Traffic Regulations.

Speed Zoning. District Traffic Engineer ISHC, Seymour, Indiana

TITLE 15 MOTOR VEHICLES, TRAFFIC AND PARKING 1 CHAPTER 1 MISCELLANEOUS

POLICY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY AND TOWNSHIP HIGHWAYS WITHIN MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS

Effective Speed Zoning Why and How

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. Honorable Bill Rosendahl, Chair Transportation Committee

Additional $200 Speeding Fine Signs

o or Violating What They Capture?

SIGNING UPDATES MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD), 2009 EDITION. CLIFF REUER SDLTAP WESTERN SATELLITE (c)

Speed measurements were taken at the following three locations on October 13 and 14, 2016 (See Location Map in Exhibit 1):

General Provisions. Traffic-Control Devices

RESTRICTIONS ON PARKING; POSTED LIMITATIONS.

forwarddallas! Implementation Proposed Chapter 43 Code Amendment On-Street Parking Transportation and Environment Committee Briefing January 14, 2008

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

ELMORE COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

Driveway Entrance Policy for Residential Properties - District 3 - All Wards

ITEM 10. ct-/ C.~~ STAFF REPORT. Mayor and City Council. Chief Angel Bernal, Police Department

Low Speed Design Criteria for Residential Streets Andrew J. Ballard, P.E. and David M. Haldeman, E.I.T.

TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT 404 EAST WASHINGTON BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS City of Brownsville Speed Hump Installation Policy

Speed Limit Reduction. January 24, 2017

CHAPTER 480 Parking Generally

Act 229 Evaluation Report

ORDINANCE NO The City finds and declares the following:

Vista Municipal Code

City of Lafayette Staff Report Circulation Commission

ITEM 8 ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO

CHAPTER 70: GENERAL PROVISIONS

Change to the Arlington County Code prohibiting the parking of commercial vehicles and recreational vehicles on residential streets

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 24, 2018

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CONSTRUCTION PARKING MANAGEMENT POLICY

Introduction. 3. The sample calculations used throughout this paper are based on a roadway posted at 35 mph.

June 9, The County Board of Arlington, Virginia. Ron Carlee, County Manager

Robert Wipperfurth, Tina Butteris, Connie Anderson. Jamie Rybarczyk, Shaun Mularkey, Amy Anderson Schweppe

POLICIES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SPEED HUMPS (Amended May 23, 2011)

Created by: St. Louis County

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

CHAPTER 11 SNOWMOBILES AND ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES SNOWMOBILE AND ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE REGULATIONS

Ordinance /11/2017

As Reported by the House Local Government Committee. 131st General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ATTACHMENT ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

San Antonio Municipal Code Selected Sections

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. General Manager, Transportation Services and Treasurer. P:\2015\Internal Services\rev\pw15018rev (AFS20761)

CHAPTER 9 PARKING REGULATIONS (SEE CHAPTER 7 FOR DEFINITIONS, SCOPE AND APPLICATION RELATING TO THIS CHAPTER)

STAFF REPORT FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 29, 2009 FILE NO: ZCA AGENDA ITEM: H-4

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

Commissioning Director for Environment. Officer Contact Details Lisa Wright; Summary

CHAPTER 11 - TRAFFIC

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

4 SPEED LIMIT REVISIONS ON REGIONAL ROADS

AGENDA REPORT. TO: Office ofthe City Administrator ATTN: Deborah Edgerly FROM: Community and Economic Development Agency DATE: June 24, 2008

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

1200 ZONES AND STUDIES Traffic Engineering Manual

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

TRAFFIC REGULATION APPROVAL PROCESS

2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Slow Down! Why speed is important in realizing your Vision Zero goals and how to achieve the speeds you need

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

1200 ZONES AND STUDIES Traffic Engineering Manual

CHAPTER 69 PARKING REGULATIONS

1400 MISCELLANEOUS Traffic Engineering Manual

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 III. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PROCEDURE... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 APPENDIX B...

CHAPTER 71: TRAFFIC REGULATIONS

Citizens Committee for Facilities

Frazeysburg Police Department

Review, Discuss, and Recommend Approval to City Council for Three New Two-Way Stop Intersections on Country Club Drive

TITLE 800 MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC. General Traffic Regulations Parking Regulations Snowmobiles...803

DRIVEWAY STANDARDS EXHIBIT A. The following definition shall replace the definition of driveway in Section 62:

SPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS

CITY OF PLACENTIA RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES 2017

County of Humboldt Department of Public Works COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SPEED HUMP POLICY

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, California

CHAPTER 69 PARKING REGULATIONS

CHAPTER 14 TRAFFIC CODE THE MINNESOTA HIGHWAY TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT.

HB Introduced by Representatives Townsend, Boyer, Petersen: Allen J, Carter, Cobb, Finchem, Leach, Mesnard, Rivero AN ACT

Speed Evaluation Saw Mill Drive

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM

CITY OF VALLEJO. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Engineering Division

CHAPTER 8. TRAFFIC REGULATIONS

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF GUELPH/ERAMOSA BY-LAW

Transcription:

TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT AGENDA ITEM #3 T/T MTG: 072815 DATE: JULY 28, 2015 TO: TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FROM: BENJAMIN CHAN, P.E, T.E., DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ROBERT YALDA, P. E., T. E., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR / CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: 2015 CITYWIDE SPEED SURVEY BACKGROUND: Speed surveys serve as a valuable information source in determining safe and reasonable speeds for local roads. Speed surveys not only compile data of the speed of vehicles on the road, but also take into account the volume of traffic on the road and the collision rates. A citywide speed survey is intended to serve as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City. The Citywide Speed Survey was conducted by National Data Base (NDS), using calibrated handheld radar speed guns. The survey has been completed and is ready for review by the Traffic & Transportation Commission. A citywide speed survey is referred to as an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) in Section 627 of the 2015 State of California Vehicle Code (CVC). The following excerpt from the CVC defines speed surveys and specifies their purpose and applications.

Engineering and Traffic Survey CVC Section 627 (a) "Engineering and Traffic Survey," as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities. (b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following: (1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Collision records. (3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following: (1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district: (A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. (B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. (C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B). (2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Citywide speed surveys serve another function. In order for law enforcement to use speed detection devices, such as speed radar, a current speed survey must be updated to reflect current conditions of the roadway. This ET&S must be updated every seven years in order to continue the use of radar speed enforcement (CVC Section 40802(c)(2)(B)(i). The speed survey presented here will serve to update the information concerning the streets of Calabasas, and allow law enforcement to use all of the tools available 2

to them to enforce speed limits. DISCUSSION: Prima Facie, Local Streets and Business Districts The California Speed Law provides blanket prima facie speed limit of 25 mph within residence districts and business districts (CVC 515 and 235). In addition, the prima facie speed of 25 mph also applies when approaching or passing a school building or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens. The California Vehicle Code also states that the law does not require posting these streets with a prima facie 25 mph limit because the aforementioned characteristics of a residence district or business district are readily apparent to a motorist. Therefore, a prima facie 25 mph speed limit can be enforced with radar units. However, CVC Section 22357 permits the establishment of speed limits greater than 25 mph upon the basis that an ET&S that has a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe. The local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit in the range between 30 to 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. Existing Guidelines for Posting Speed Limits California State Law requires that the posting of speed limits be based on the 85 th percentile of travel speeds for any street. The 85 th percentile speed is defined as the speed at which 85% of the traffic is traveling at or below that said speed. Experience has shown that the 85 th percentile speed is characteristic to safe and reliable driving and generally presents a reasonable speed limit. In general, speed limits are set in increments of 5 mph. Speed limits that are set 10 miles or more below the 85 th percentile will tend to make a large number of drivers operate their vehicles at a speed above the set limit. For practical purposes and to conform to the 5 mph increment, the numerical speed limit is usually at the 5 mph increment directly above or below the 85 th percentile speed. This numerical value is a realistic and enforceable speed limit that allows law enforcement agencies to issue citations to reckless and/or unreliable drivers 3

who do not conform to what the majority (85%) of drivers find to be reasonable speed. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. Any adjustments beyond the additional 5 mph reduction are much more difficult to defend and may not be acceptable in the court of law. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 21400 (b). Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Analysis and Review of City Streets The majority of the speed limits within the City will not change. However, based upon the recent speed survey, there are three street segments where speed limits will decrease. They are identified and highlighted in Attachment B. The following is a brief summary for the street segments where a change is recommended in the posted speed limit: Park Sorrento/Civic Center Way- between Parkway Calabasas and Calabasas Rd Existing 30 mph: The findings of the speed survey show that the 85th percentile speed is 28 mph. The nearest five mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would be rounded up to 30 mph. Taking into consideration the recent restriping of parking layout from angle to perpendicular parking on Civic Center Way, between Park Sorrento and Calabasas Rd and the presence of pedestrians crossing Civic Center Way near the Commons, it is recommended that the proposed speed limit on Park Sorrento/Civic Center Way between Parkway Calabasas and Calabasas Rd be lowered to 25 mph from the current posted speed of 30 mph. Mureau Rd between Las Virgenes Rd and Los Angeles County Boundary Line Existing 45 mph: The findings of the speed survey show that the 85 th percentile speed is 42 mph. The nearest five mph increment of the 85 th percentile speed would be rounded down to 40 mph. Taking into consideration the numerous driveways within this segment of the roadway, it is recommended that the proposed speed limit on Mureau Rd between Las Virgenes Rd and Los Angeles County Boundary Line be lowered to 40 mph from the current posted speed of 45 mph. 4

Calabasas Rd between Mureau Rd and Civic Center Way Existing 45 mph: The findings of the speed survey show that the 85th percentile speed is 42 mph. The nearest five mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would be rounded down to 40 mph. Taking into consideration the numerous driveways within this segment of the roadway and the presence of delivery trucks unloading cars to several dealerships west of Parkway Calabasas, it is recommended that the proposed speed limit on Calabasas Rd between Mureau Rd and Civic Center Way be lowered to 40 mph from the current posted speed of 45 mph. REQUESTED ACTION It is requested that the Traffic & Transportation Commission: 1. Provide input and comments regarding the Citywide Speed Survey. 2. Recommend the new Citywide Speed Survey to the Calabasas City Council. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Applicable California Vehicle Code Sections, 2015 Edition Attachment B: Citywide Speed Survey Attachment C: Color-Keyed Map of Speed Limits 5