APPENDIX A Basis of Design and Design Criteria Memorandum

Similar documents
The Design-Builder shall meet local road criteria provided by the local governing agencies.

DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION DS 3 STREETS

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

DIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAYS AT HIGHWAYS WITHOUT CURB

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. June Dear Customer:

SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH STREET DESIGN DEVIATION REQUESTS

SECTION STREETS CITY OF LEE S SUMMIT, MISSOURI DESIGN CRITERIA

800 Access Control, R/W Use Permits and Drive Design

Section 6H.01 Typical Applications

CHANGE LIST for MDOT Traffic and Safety Geometric Design Guides. May 23, 2017: The following update was made to the web site.

2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary

Sight Distance. A fundamental principle of good design is that

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

Fire Apparatus Access Roads in Marysville

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

June WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Program Seattle, Washington

CEE 320. Fall Horizontal Alignment

Horizontal Sight Distance Considerations Freeway and Interchange Reconstruction

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

S. WEST STREET EXTENSION ALTERNATIVES STUDY

Horizontal Alignment

DRIVEWAY STANDARDS EXHIBIT A. The following definition shall replace the definition of driveway in Section 62:

EMERGENCY ACCESS POLICY

Design For At Speed Test Diagnosis And Measurement

Construction Noise Memorandum

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (DPW) DRIVEWAY RULES AND PROCEDURES

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

POLICY ON SPEED HUMPS

Access Management Standards

ELMORE COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

Schedule 18 (Technical Requirements) DBFO Agreement EXECUTION VERSION APPENDIX B - SELECT DEPARTMENT STANDARD DRAWINGS AND REFERENCE TABLES

La Paz County Public Works Standards Volume I

1.3 Research Objective

JCE4600 Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering

Interchange Ramp Characteristics (Selection and Design)

Page

IH 35 FEASIBILITY STUDY

DIVISION V SURFACINGS AND PAVEMENTS

Brent Spence Bridge Design Exceptions - Alternative I

Lake County Building Department

Town of Fuquay-Varina

Geometric Design Elements to Reduce Wrong-Way (WW) Entry at Freeway Interchanges Hugo Zhou, Ph.D., P.E.

Recommendations for AASHTO Superelevation Design

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

SPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS

DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT 200' TYPICAL SPACING (YELLOW DELINEATORS) END OF MERGE LANE TAPER DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT

VDOT 2008 Road and Bridge Standards Section Transition Curves

Crash Reconstruction Crash Report and assessment Road Safety Reviews Road Safety Assessment Case Studies/Evaluation

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

CITY OF FARMERSVILLE, TEXAS

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

NORTHWEST HIGHWAY S-CURVE PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE ACCESS FEASIBILITY STUDY. Northwest Highway (US 14) From Seegers Road to Western Avenue

1400 MISCELLANEOUS Traffic Engineering Manual

Engineering Report: Shasta-Trinity National Forest. Shasta McCloud Management Unit. Analysis of. National Forest System Road 37N79

Technical Memorandum. To: From: Date: October 14 th, 2018 Project #: 1302 Project Name: Subject: Distribution:

DRIVEWAY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES

WELCOME PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE FOR US-64 FROM THE SH-18 INTERSECTION EAST 6.5 MILES JANUARY 10TH, 2017 PAWNEE CITY HALL, 5:30 PM

Conventional Approach

CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 III. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PROCEDURE... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 APPENDIX B...

CITY OF POWAY MEMORANDUM

PERMIT FOR INSTALLATION ON COUNTY RIGHTS-OF-WAY: ACCESS DRIVEWAYS RESIDENTIAL

Guardrail/Bridgerail Recommendations for Very Low Volume Local Roads in Kansas

CHAPTER 15 STREET LIGHTING TABLE OF CONTENTS

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

GEOMETRIC ALIGNMENT AND DESIGN

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

Speed measurements were taken at the following three locations on October 13 and 14, 2016 (See Location Map in Exhibit 1):

CHAMPLAIN PARKWAY GRADE CROSSING DIAGNOSTIC MATRIX

HARDEE COUNTY ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT Driveway-Culvert Installation Permit

EL DORADO COUNTY REGIONAL FIRE PROTECTION STANDARD

2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Engineering Report: Shasta-Trinity National Forest. South Fork Management Unit. Analysis of. National Forest System Road 30N44

City of Pacific Grove

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 603 SIGNS

CHAPTER 2 ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT

Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering GATES PERMITTING, DESIGN & INSPECTION GUIDE

SPEED HUMP POLICY. It is the policy of Hamilton Township to consider requests for speed humps as outlined below:

POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION. Effective Date: July 10, 2013

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION 961 PORTABLE TRAFFIC SIGNALS OCTOBER 17, 2008

a. A written request for speed humps must be submitted by residents living along the applicable street(s) to the Public Works Department.

CHAPTER 19 PARKING TABLE OF CONTENTS

Lee County DOT Traffic Section Design Standard for Sign Installation

Title 12 STREETS, SIDEWALKS, PATHWAYS, PUBLIC PLACES. Chapter TRACK VEHICLES

Traffic Generation November 28, Mr. Todd Baker Baker Properties, LLC 953 Islington Street Suite 23D Portsmouth, NH 03801

CROW WING COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO ROADS UNDER COUNTY JURISDICTION CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION

Tab C Road Design Standards

US 70 Corridor Planning for the Future

Chapter 4 COLLISION REDUCTION PROGRAM

GEOMETRIC PARAMETERS Affecting Capacity ICD 2

Site DNL Calculator. Guidelines:

AMENDED CULVERT POLICY WITH MAIL BOX POLICY

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

STREETS AND ROADS DESIGN MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL... S-1

SPEED HUMP POLICY and PROCEDURES for RESIDENTIAL AREAS

Transcription:

APPENDIX A Basis of Design and Design Criteria Memorandum

Job No: Y01-500 Files are stored in: Engineering / Client / Yolo/Y01500 Buckeye and Rumsey/Rumsey CR 41 over Cache Creek, CAD files stored in: Engineering / Client / Yolo/Y01500 Buckeye and Rumsey/Rumsey/CAD Replacement Bridge CAD ID No.: Y01500 Roadway Design Criteria Design Document Determine which documents will control the design: X California Highway Design Manual (must be used if the project is on or connecting to a State Highway) X AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (Green Book 2004) X Local Standard (Yolo County Standards) X AASHTO Guidelines for Geometric Design of Very-Low Volume Local Roads Units Does the client prefer English or Metric Units? X English Metric Deliverables Does the Client prefer AutoCAD or Microstation? Will there be an electronic submittal? Does the Client have particular CAD Standards Design in AutoCAD Civil 3D Yes Yes **Dept PM still negotiating *Make sure to get the clients color table, plot driver, and Standards How will the roadway be designed? X InRoads Civil 3D Design Parameters (You are responsible for validating or altering design criteria listed on the field review form) What is the Current and Future ADT? 180 (2010) 335 (2030) (From HBP forms) What is the roadway classification? Local Rural (Farmland & Winery nearby) Is there any future plan which may change the roadway classification? NO What is the terrain? X Level Rolling Mountainous What is the operating speed of the facility? 45 mph (no posted signs visible) What is the design speed of adjacent roadway sections? 55 mph What is the design speed of current roadway within project limits? 45 mph Are there any obstacles (both existing and future) which may affect stopping sight distance? Are there any other planned projects within or adjacent to the project limits? No The minimum Design Speed for this criteria should be? 40 MPH Are there any right of way issues which may affect alignment? No Are there any Environmentally Sensitive Areas which may affect alignment or design? Nothing on mainline, trees/bridge barrier may affect driveway sight distance None Does the Client have any special requests or considerations they want addressed? Minimize Right of Way Impacts The proposed design speed for this project is 45 MPH Does this meet the standards Yes/No. If No, what form of Design Exception is needed Quincy Engineering, Inc.

Design Criteria Cont'd Max Super Elevation: 12% Minimum Horizontal Curve Radius (Be sure not to exceed max super): 510' Max Allowable K value for crest vertical curves 61 Max Allowable K value for sag vertical curves 79 SSD 45MPH =360' Minimum Length of Vertical Curves Lmin = 3V = 135' Max Grade 5% Cross Section based on: New Construction 3R Criteria x Roadway Bridge (Low Volume Guide) Shoulder Width 2' paved Lane Width: 2-10' Bridge: Paved Approach Width - 32' (Clear) Edge of Shoulder to Hinge Point 4' AB @ 3% Side Slopes 2:1 Meets Roadside Design Guide Criteria X Yes No Minimum Vertical Clearance Bridges Freeway 16.5' Non-Freeway 15.5' Rail Road 23' X Other Convey Q50 and Q100, Design Minimum soffit elevation: Elev XX.XX Exception Required *Be sure Profile takes into account Superelevation, Bridge skew, Falsework and Superstructure Depth Structural Section TI R value Proposed Structural Section (consider life cycle costs)*** 0.50' HMA (Per Structural Section Calculations) 1.0' AB 0 AS (consider stabilization options if low R value) ***No R value data yet, County min is 0.33' HMA over 1.0' AB Detours Required to Construct Duration 0 Alternative Routes Yes Proposed Design Speed Drainage Requirements Onsite Drainage 10 YRS Storm Allowable Spread on Shoulder Cross Culverts 10 YRS Storm (consider life cycle costs) Full Design Engineer to present to PIC, PM, and PE Design Engineer Krassimir Panayotov, PE Signatures: Project Engineer Project Manager Principal In Charge Quincy Engineering, Inc.

Design Criteria Memorandum Yolo County Work Order 4576 CR 41 over Cache Creek Bridge Replacement Criteria Street Type/Functional Classification Structural Sections Local Standards (Yolo Cnty 2008) AASHTO Guidelines (2011) AASHTO Low-Volume Guidelines (2001) Rural Street Rural Local Road Rural Local Road Major Access Follow CT HDM procedures. Increase GE by factor of 1.35 for TI <=9, 1.25 TI>9. Min Section 4 AC/ 12 AB Design Speed Rural/Unposted - 65mph 40 mph Based on level terrain and ADT 325 (p.5-1) Lane Width 2-12 40 mph, 2-9 (p.5-5) 45 mph, 2-10 Shoulder Width Public Access to Creek 8 (4 full paved section + 4 AB section) General Plan Policy CO- 1.23, CO-1.26 Caltrans HDM (Sixth Edition) Local Streets or Roads Based on R value and TI Based on R value and TI Based on R value and TI (Chapter 630) 40 mph Based on level terrain and ADT 325 (p.5-2) Total Width, TW & Shld 40 mph 18 (24 for Ag) 45 mph 20 (26 for Ag) Refer to AASHTO or Local Agency Std Min 24 paved (310.1) 2-12 2 foot graded (p.5-6) See above Refer to AASHTO or local std Proposed Standard Rural Local ** No TI or R values yet 45 mph (HBP Application) 5 (2 full paved section + 3 AB section) see Public Access Below N/A N/A N/A TBD -Need wider shoulders/parking/ada creek access, prevent motor vehicles Bridge Width 32 40 mph 22 40 mph 18 (24 for Ag) - 28 (12 lanes, 2 shldr) (Clear) 45 mph 24 45 mph 20 (26 for Ag) Bicycle Lane Width 4 Refer to AASHTO Bike Guide Refer to AASHTO Bike Guide Min 4 shoulder (1000.1) Not a designated bicycle lane Median Width N/A - N/A N/A Median cross slope N/A - N/A N/A Minimum Right of Way Width 54 10 from catch point of C/F (304.2) 54 min, 40 existing, additional may be req d Normal Cross 2%, 3% choker 1.5% to 2% (p.5-3) 1.5% to 3% (301.2) 2%, 3% choker Slope Side Slopes 2:1 or flatter Depends on slope stability (refer to Roadside Design Guide) 4:1 or flatter (304.1) 2:1 side slope subject to Geotechnical Verification, 1.5:1 front QEI Project Number Y01-500 Page 1 of 2

Design Criteria Memorandum Yolo County Work Order 4576 CR 41 over Cache Creek Bridge Replacement Criteria Maximum Superelevation Rate Minimum Horiz Curve Radius Pavement Corner Radii Local Standards (Yolo Cnty 2008) *Minimum tangent length between reversing curves 50 AASHTO Guidelines (2011) AASHTO Low-Volume Guidelines (2001) Caltrans HDM (Sixth Edition) 12% max (p.5-3) Refer to AASHTO or local std Proposed Standard slopes protected with RSP 12% None listed 40 mph 381 40 mph - 395 (Exh 3) 40 mph 550 (203.2) 510 45 mph 500 45 mph 510 45 mph 700 Driveway 20 min 15-25 feet (p.619) 30 (Bus Design Vehicle) 20 for driveway Grade.5% Min existing streets 5% Max (p.5-3) Refer to AASHTO or local std Minimum N/A 40 mph 445 Setback 10 + shldr Corner Sight 45 mph 500 (p.9-38) Corner sight distance = Distance at (assuming stop at SSD (500 ) (405.1) Intersections driveway) Minimum Stopping Sight Distance Clear Zone Width Drainage Design Per CT HDM None listed Per Yolo Cnty Drainage Manual Drainage systems 10 yr storm Open Channel 1 FB above 100 yr 40 mph -305 (p.5-4) 45 mph 360 45 mph K Crest 61 45 mph K Sag - 79 7 to 10 feet from ETW (p.5-8) Refer to AASHTO drainage manuals 40 mph -250 (Exh.12) 45 mph 300 45 mph K Crest 42 45 mph K Sag - 79 45 mph - 360 (201.1) 45 mph K Crest 98 45 mph K Sag - 78 Refer to AASHTO or local std Conventional Highway, Rural 25 yr storm, spread within the shoulder Culvert 10yr no headwater above inlet top, 100yr with objectionable backwater 0.5% min to 5% max 610 (for driveway turn) Setback 10 + shldr 45 mph 300 45 mph K Crest 61 45 mph K Sag - 79 AASHTO 7 to 10 feet from ETW (p.5-8), guardrail shielding required in zone Use Yolo Cnty Drainage Manual Drainage systems 10 yr storm Open Channel 1 FB above 100 yr Design Vehicle None listed Large School Bus Ca Truck (404.3) (not an STAA route) Ca Truck QEI Project Number Y01-500 Page 2 of 2

APPENDIX B Preliminary Roadway Alternatives

Replacement on the New Alignment

APPENDIX C Preliminary Structure Alternatives

ELEVATION TIED ARCH TYPICAL SECTION APPROACH SPAN TYPICAL SECTION PLAN