Consumers' willingness to pay for alternative fuel vehicle: comparative analysis between US and Japan

Similar documents
Changes of Japanese Consumer Preference for Electric

Smart Grid Pilot Project in Japan An Update

Willingness to pay for the infrastructure investments. for alternative fuel vehicles

Impacts of Tighter CAFE and GHG Regula<ons on Automo<ve Profits. Walter McManus Economist Automo2ve Analysis Group

What consumers teach us about PHEVs, electric-drive and fuel economy

Energy Saving Potential Study on Thailand s Road Sector:

German Aerospace Center (DLR) Institute of Vehicle Concepts

Analysis of CO2 Emissions to Consider Future Technologies and Integrated Approaches in the Road Transport Sector

Optimal Policy for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles Adoption IAEE 2014

Electric vehicles a one-size-fits-all solution for emission reduction from transportation?

Nihon Keizai Shimbun (Japan Economy Newspaper), January 25th, 2013, morning edition Originally written in Japanese

CHANGE IN DRIVERS PARKING PREFERENCE AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF STRENGTHENED PARKING REGULATIONS

Emerging Smart Grid Community in Japan after the March Disaster

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Regulatory opportunities, design challenges and policy- relevant research. Fanta Kamakaté. July 30, 2009

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

Technological Innovation, Environmentally Sustainable Transport, Travel Demand, Scenario Analysis, CO 2

Impacts of Electric Vehicles. The main results of the recent study by CE Delft, ICF and Ecologic

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

ELECTRIC VEHICLES & NEW YORK

Early adopters of EVs in Germany unveiled

TRANSIT CONNECT ELECTRIC BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLE E 450 BALANCE HYBRID ELECTRIC

How vehicle fuel economy improvements can save $2 trillion and help fund a long-term transition to plug-in vehicles

Understanding demand for hybrid and plug-in electric vehicles in the U.S. using large-scale consumer profile data. Rubal Dua Kenny White

Area-Wide Road Pricing Research in Minnesota

E-GO: An Innovative Electric Car Sharing Project in Roma Tre University

Employment Impacts of Electric Vehicles

CO2 Reduction in Transportation (Automobile)

EV, fuel cells and biofuels competitors or partners?

A Techno-Economic Analysis of BEVs with Fast Charging Infrastructure. Jeremy Neubauer Ahmad Pesaran

H 2. State of the World Fuel Economy. Paris, 11 June 2015

1 Faculty advisor: Roland Geyer

State Policy Trends in Biomass

H 2. State-of-the-World Fuel Economy. Paris, 11 June 2015

A PHEV is a hybrid vehicle with batteries that can be recharged by connecting a plug to an external power source.

Investigation of CO 2 emissions in usage phase due to an electric vehicle - Study of battery degradation impact on emissions -

A multi-model approach: international electric vehicle adoption

Young Researchers Seminar 2015

Comparing consumer preferences for electrified vehicles in China and the U.S.

Providing Choices for Sustainable Mobility. Takehito Yokoo Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.

Electric vehicles demand forecast. Erwan Hemery and Bruce Smith

Reliability of Hybrid Vehicle System

Hydrogen Fueling Stations for Fuel Cell Vehicles: Status of Recent California and International Efforts

Index Long term vision Transport sector in the big picture Cost effectiveness of low carbon technologies investment Sales mix in the coming decades Sh

Smart Transportation:

Perspectives on Vehicle Technology and Market Trends

A Framework for Quantitative Analysis of Government Policy Influence on Electric Vehicle Market

Energy Challenges and Costs for Transport & Mobility. 13th EU Hitachi Science and Technology Forum: Transport and Mobility towards 2050

Land Transport Demand Analysis and Energy Saving Potentials in Thailand

Can Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) Revenues Improve Market for Electric Vehicles?

CHARGING AHEAD: UNDERSTANDING THE ELECTRIC-VEHICLE INFRASTRUCTURE CHALLENGE

Safer or Cheaper? Household Safety Concerns, Vehicle Choices, and the Costs of Fuel Economy Standards

SW Clean Transportation Project

John Paul Helveston 1, Yimin Liu 4, Elea McDonnel Feit 3, Erica Fuchs 1, Erica Klamfl 4, Jeremy Michalek 1,2

3. TECHNOLOGIES FOR MEETING ZEV PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS AND PRODUCTION VOLUME ESTIMATES

Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles Exhaust emissions and user barriers for a Plug-in Toyota Prius

Pathways to Sustainable Mobility

MEASURING AND MODELING FUTURE VEHICLE PREFERENCES: A PRELIMINARY STATED PREFERENCE SURVEY IN MARYLAND

Assessment of Future ICE and Fuel-Cell Powered Vehicles and Their Potential Impacts

Singapore and Manila March Successful Deployment of Low Emission Vehicles Industry Viewpoint

Director, Global Warming Prevention Division, Aichi Prefectural Government. Nobuhiro Ito

The Facts on. WHATReally Affects FUEL ECONOMY? Number. in a series of 6

California Transportation Electrification and the ZEV Mandate. Analisa Bevan Assistant Division Chief, ECARS November 2016

ENERGY INTENSITIES OF FLYING AND DRIVING

Outline. Research Questions. Electric Scooters in Viet Nam and India: Factors Influencing (lack of) Adoption and Environmental Implications 11/4/2009

Mitsubishi Motors EV Commitment. David N. Patterson, PE Chief Engineer Mitsubishi Motors North America

Vehicle Scrappage and Gasoline Policy. Online Appendix. Alternative First Stage and Reduced Form Specifications

Electric vehicles and urban transport externalities is OSLO a good example?

INCENTIVIZING ZERO EMISSION VEHICLE PURCHASES IN VERMONT

An Analytic Method for Estimation of Electric Vehicle Range Requirements, Electrification Potential and Prospective Market Size*

Fuel Cell Vehicles as Integral Part in the Electrification of the Automobile. Lars Peter Thiesen, General Motors Europe

FUTURE TRANSPORT SYSTEMS: E-MOBILITY, HYDROGEN AND FUEL CELLS

Strategies for Sustainable Energy

Road Transport Energy Demand and CO 2 Emissions in APEC Economies through 2040

The Electricity and Transportation Infrastructure Convergence Using Electrical Vehicles

Grid Services From Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles: A Key To Economic Viability?

Okada Akira Faculty of Environmental and Information Studies, Tokyo City University

Chris Pick. Ford Motor Company. Vehicle Electrification Technologies and Industry Approaches

On the Role of Body-in-White Weight Reduction in the Attainment of the US EPA/NHTSA Fuel Economy Mandate

Assessing impacts of fuel economy measures FEPIT

Kenta Furukawa, Qiyan Wang, Masakazu Yamashita *

Profitability and Environmental Benefit of Providing. Renewable Energy for Electric Vehicle Charging. Ian Andrew Nienhueser

Naturalistic Drive Cycles Analysis and Synthesis for Pick-up Trucks. Zifan Liu Dr. Andrej Ivanco Dr. Zoran Filipi

A Microsimulation of Energy Demand and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Use

Azure Dynamics is a leading developer of highly efficient, cost-effective and environmentally friendly hybrid-electric ( HEV ) and electric ( EV )

Consumer Choice Modeling

Vermont IEEE PES Drive Electric Vermont Update

Electric Autos and West Virginia Energy

Consumers, Vehicles and Energy Integration (CVEI) project

Upstream Emissions from Electric Vehicle Charging

Energy 101 Energy Technology and Policy

Utah Road Usage Charge Program

State Highway 32 East TIGER Discretionary Grant Application APPENDIX C - BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS REPORT

Aging of the light vehicle fleet May 2011

Bob Yuhnke Southwest Energy Efficiency Project Regional Air Quality Council 8/6/2010

WASHINGTON STATE ROAD USAGE CHARGE ASSESSMENT

Michigan Public Service Commission Electric Vehicle Pilot Discussion

CO 2 Emissions: A Campus Comparison

CONNECTED PROPULSION - THE FUTURE IS NOW

DOE OVT Energy Storage R&D Overview

Transcription:

April 25 2012 Consumers' willingness to pay for alternative fuel vehicle: comparative analysis between US and Japan Takanori Ida, Kyoto University, Japan Kayo Murakami, Tokyo City University, Japan Makoto Tanaka, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, Japan Lee Friedman, University of California Berkeley, USA

I. Analysis between USA and Japan

Demographics

Survey was conducted via on-line in February of 2012.

Questionnaires

An eco-car is a vehicle that improves fuel economy by using electricity and electric motor power, unlike conventional gasoline-powered vehicles. Fuel economy (The cost for the same distance) The cost for gas and electricity Mileage (Per one charging or fueling) Greenhouse gas emissions Fuel availability Electric Vehicle(EV) Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle(PHEV) EV PHEV Reduced by about 20 to 80 percent Approximately 200 to 1500 km Reduced by about 20 to 80 percent Charging at home Rechargeable at home outlet. Requires overnight or about 8 hours for sufficient charge. Run by a battery and a electric motor with a great fuel economy. Charge needed. Utilizes both power of electric motor and gasoline engine with improved fuel economy. Both fueling and charging is possible with a plug-in function. The price is about 300,000 to 1 million yen higher than the same type of gasoline car (2 million yen) EV only needs charging and PHEV needs charging and fueling Fast charging 80 percent charge in 30 minutes at gas stations with fast charging equipment. Gas station In addition to charging, Fueling is possible at conventional gas stations. The same type of gasoline vehicle and the conventional hybrid vehicle Vehicles run by gasoline engine. The hybrid vehicle uses both a electric motor and a gasoline engine, but cannot be charged since it has no plug-in function. The price is about 2 million yen. Cost per 1 liter of gas 120 to 150 yen per 20 km 700 1000km Reduced about 0 50 percent Fueling Gas station Fueling at gas stations as before.

Conjoint Econometrics

Estimation Results US respondents (all) Coeff. Std.Err. WTP($) <fixed parameter> Purchace Price (US$) -0.0003 0.0000 Constant_No_car -5.1409 0.1200 <mean of random parameter> Fuel cost (% off compared with gasoline vehicles) 0.0037 0.0009 14.04 Range (miles) 0.0015 0.0000 5.85 Emission reduction (% reduction) 0.0163 0.0009 62.69 Fuel station availability (X out of 10 stations have alternative fuel) Home plug-in construction fee (US$1000) 0.0072 0.0006 27.50-0.0065 0.0003-25.16 <s.d. of random parameter> Fuel cost 0.0327 0.0011 Range 0.0016 0.0000 Emission reduction 0.0321 0.0009 Fuel station availability 0.0266 0.0005 Home plug-in construction fee 0.0083 0.0004 Japanese respondents Coeff. Std.Err. WTP(US$) <fixed parameter> Purchase Price (US$) -0.0002 0.0000 Constant_No_car -6.1664 0.13581 <mean of random parameter> Fuel cost (% off compared with gasoline vehicles) 0.0018 0.0011 7.51 Range (miles) 0.0029 0.0001 11.70 Emission reduction (% reduction) Fuel station availability (X out of 10 stations have alternative fuel) Home plug-in construction fee (US$1000) 0.0212 0.0010 86.37 0.0033 0.0007 13.31-0.0049 0.0003-20.02 <s.d. of random parameter> Fuel cost 0.0399 0.0012 Range 0.0042 0.0001 Emission reduction 0.0306 0.0010 Fuel station availability 0.0288 0.0006 Home plug-in construction fee 0.0047 0.0006 Number of obs. 33616 McFadden Pseudo R-squared 0.3301 Log likelihood function -31218.942 Number of obs. 32000 McFadden Pseudo R-squared 0.3849643 Log likelihood function -27283.86

WTP Values for Conjoint Characteristics WTP%for%alterna;ve%fuel%vehicle% US%% Japan% US$%($1= 80) 100.0%% 80.0%% 60.0%% 40.0%% 20.0%% 0.0%% C20.0%% C40.0%% Fuel%cost%% (%%off%compared%with% gasoline%vehicles)% Range%% (miles)% Emission%reduc;on%% (%%reduc;on)% Fuel%sta;on% availability%% (X%out%of%10%sta;ons% have%alterna;ve%fuel)% Home%plugCin% construc;on%fee%% (US$100)% US%% 13.9%% 5.8%% 61.7%% 27.1%% C24.8%% Japan% 7.5% 11.7% 86.4% 13.3% C20.0%

Choice Probability Elasticity (Japan) Choice)Probability)elas;city)with)conjoint)characteris;cs)(Japan) EV) PHEV) Gasoline)Car) 2) 1) 0) A1) A2) A3) A4) Purchase)Price)(US$)) Fuel)cost)(%)) Range)(miles)) Japan) Emission)reduc;on) (%)) Fuel)sta;on) availability) Home)plugAin) construc;on)fee)) EV) A3.285) 0.5622) 0.1499) 1.2133) 0.053) A0.1025) PHEV) A2.8601) 0.1421) 1.2183) 0.6334) 0.047) A0.0856) Gasoline)Car) A2.1245) A0.0176) 0.5449) 0.0829) 0.3441) 0)

Choice Probability Elasticity (USA) Choice)Probability)elas;city)with)conjoint)characteris;cs)(USA) EV) PHEV) Gasoline)Car) 2) 1) 0) A1) A2) A3) A4) Purchase)Price)(US$)) Fuel)cost)(%)) Range)(miles)) USA) Emission)reduc;on) (%)) Fuel)sta;on) availability) Home)plugAin) construc;on)fee)) EV) A3.1952) 0.5705) 0.1835) 1.2971) 0.1188) A0.1185) PHEV) A2.9882) 0.2032) 1.1060) 0.6973) 0.1110) A0.1054) Gasoline)Car) A1.7914) 0.0013) 0.4408) 0.0572) 0.3535) 0)

Scenario Analysis Scenario 1 (Realistic) Scenario 2 (Modest innovation) Scenario 3 (Radical innovation) EV PHEV Gas Car No Car EV PHEV Gas Car No Car EV PHEV Gas Car No Car Purchase Price (US$) 30000 30000 20000 0 25000 25000 20000 0 23000 23000 20000 0 Constant_No_car 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Fuel cost (% off compared with gasoline vehicles) 60 40 10 0 70 50 10 0 80 60 10 0 Range (miles) 200 1200 800 0 300 1300 800 0 400 1400 800 0 Emission reduction (% reduction) 80 60 10 0 90 70 10 0 100 80 10 0 Fuel station availability (X out of 10 stations have alternative fuel) 30 30 100 0 50 50 100 0 70 70 100 0 Home plug-in construction fee (US$100) 10 10 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

Choice Probability Simulation 1 Scenario 1 (Realistic) EV PHEV Gas Car No Car Japan USA 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% USA Japan EV 2.8% 2.5% PHEV 8.5% 27.7% Gas Car 78.8% 68.7% No Car 9.9% 1.1%

Choice Probability Simulation 2 Scenario 2 (Modest innovation) EV PHEV Gas Car No Car Japan USA 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% USA Japan EV 12.7% 6.4% PHEV 38.9% 70.7% Gas Car 43.0% 22.6% No Car 5.4% 0.4%

Choice Probability Simulation 3 Scenario 3 (Radical innovation) EV PHEV Gas Car No Car Japan USA 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% USA Japan EV 19.7% 7.7% PHEV 60.6% 84.9% Gas Car 17.5% 7.3% No Car 2.2% 0.1%

II. Analysis across US four states

Demographics

Questionnaires

Conjoint Econometrics

Estimation Results US respondents (all) California Texas Michigan New York Coeff. Std.Err. WTP($) Coeff. Std.Err. WTP($) Coeff. Std.Err. WTP($) Coeff. Std.Err. WTP($) Coeff. <fixed parameter> Purchace Price (US$) -0.0003 0.0000-0.0003 0.0000-0.0003 0.0001-0.0003 0.0000-0.0003 0.0000 Constant_No_car -5.1409 0.1200-4.7112 0.2295-5.2604 0.2448-5.6556 0.2455-5.1409 0.1200 <mean of random parameter> Fuel cost (% off compared with gasoline vehicles) 0.0037 0.0009 14.04 0.0099 0.0018 39.40 0.0015 0.0020 5.52-0.0017 0.0019-5.97 0.0037 0.0009 14.04 Range (miles) 0.0015 0.0000 5.85 0.0015 0.0001 6.16 0.0016 0.0008 5.78 0.0017 0.0001 5.90 0.0015 0.0000 5.85 Std.Err. WTP($) Emission reduction (% reduction) 0.0163 0.0009 62.69 0.0166 0.0017 66.40 0.0158 0.0018 58.59 0.0199 0.0017 68.59 0.0163 0.0009 62.69 Fuel station availability (X out of 10 stations have alternative fuel) Home plug-in construction fee (US $100) <s.d. of random parameter> 0.0072 0.0006 27.50 0.0054 0.0012 21.48 0.0088 0.0013 32.74 0.0075 0.0013 25.76 0.0072 0.0006 27.50-0.0065 0.0003-25.16-0.0055 0.0006-21.88-0.0066 0.0006-24.36-0.0077 0.0006-26.39-0.0065 0.0003-25.16 Fuel cost 0.0327 0.0011 0.0277 0.0018 0.0358 0.0023 0.0390 0.0020 0.0327 0.0011 Range 0.0016 0.0000 0.0017 0.0001 0.0018 0.0001 0.0016 0.0001 0.0016 0.0000 Emission reduction 0.0321 0.0009 0.0315 0.0014 0.0329 0.0021 0.0270 0.0016 0.0321 0.0009 Fuel station availability 0.0266 0.0005 0.0235 0.0010 0.0276 0.0011 0.0290 0.0011 0.0266 0.0005 Home plug-in construction fee 0.0083 0.0004 0.0073 0.0009 0.0080 0.0009 0.0084 0.0010 0.0083 0.0004 Number of obs. 33616 8176 8712 8560 8168 McFadden Pseudo R- squared Log likelihood function -31218.94 2 0.3301 0.3066 0.3463 0.3487 0.3301-7858.795 05-7895.573 36-7728.603 67-31218.94 196

WTP Values for Conjoint Characteristics WTP%for%alterna;ve%fuel%vehicle% California% Texas% Michigan% New%York% 80.0%% US$%($1= 80) 60.0%% 40.0%% 20.0%% 0.0%% C20.0%% C40.0%% Fuel%cost%% (%%off%compared%with% gasoline%vehicles)% Range%% (miles)% Emission%reduc;on%% (%%reduc;on)% Fuel%sta;on% availability%% (X%out%of%10%sta;ons% have%alterna;ve%fuel)% Home%plugCin% construc;on%fee%% (US$100)% California% 39.4% 6.2% 66.4% 21.5% C21.9% Texas% 5.5% 5.8% 58.6% 32.7% C24.4% Michigan% C6.0% 5.9% 68.6% 25.8% C26.4% New%York% 14.0% 5.8% 62.7% 27.5% C25.2%

USA California Texas Choice Probability Elasticity Purchase Price (US$) Fuel cost (%) Range (miles) Emission reduction (%) Fuel station availability Home plug-in construction fee EV -3.1952 0.5705 0.1835 1.2971 0.1188-0.1185 PHEV -2.9882 0.2032 1.106 0.6973 0.111-0.1054 Gasoline Car -1.7914 0.0013 0.4408 0.0572 0.3535 0 Purchase Price (US$) Fuel cost (%) Range (miles) Emission reduction (%) Fuel station availability Home plug-in construction fee EV -2.9594 0.6212 0.1843 1.2266 0.094-0.103 PHEV -2.7083 0.275 1.0626 0.6401 0.091-0.092 Gasoline Car -1.9212 0.0351 0.513 0.0565 0.3751 0 Purchase Price (US$) Fuel cost (%) Range (miles) Emission reduction (%) Fuel station availability EV -3.2046 0.5846 0.1792 1.2918 0.1431-0.1223 PHEV -3.008 0.1825 1.1533 0.6986 0.1315-0.1085 Gasoline Car -1.7234-0.0094 0.4255 0.0546 0.3626 0 Michigan Purchase Price (US$) Fuel cost (%) Range (miles) Emission reduction (%) Fuel station availability EV -3.6395 0.6597 0.2157 1.3578 0.1246-0.149 PHEV -3.2482 0.1493 1.1959 0.7396 0.1064-0.1288 Gasoline Car -1.8265-0.0255 0.4588 0.081 0.3416 New York Purchase Price (US$) Fuel cost (%) Range (miles) Emission reduction (%) Fuel station availability EV -3.1952 0.5705 0.1835 1.2971 0.1188-0.1185 PHEV -2.9882 0.2032 1.106 0.6973 0.111-0.1054 Gasoline Car -1.7914 0.0013 0.4408 0.0572 0.3535 0

Scenario Analysis Scenario 1 (Realistic) Scenario 2 (Modest innovation) Scenario 3 (Radical innovation) EV PHEV Gas Car No Car EV PHEV Gas Car No Car EV PHEV Gas Car No Car Purchase Price (US$) 30000 30000 20000 0 25000 25000 20000 0 23000 23000 20000 0 Constant_No_car 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Fuel cost (% off compared with gasoline vehicles) 60 40 10 0 70 50 10 0 80 60 10 0 Range (miles) 200 1200 800 0 300 1300 800 0 400 1400 800 0 Emission reduction (% reduction) 80 60 10 0 90 70 10 0 100 80 10 0 Fuel station availability (X out of 10 stations have alternative fuel) 30 30 100 0 50 50 100 0 70 70 100 0 Home plug-in construction fee (US$100) 10 10 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

Choice Probability Simulation 1 Scenario 1 (Realistic) EV PHEV Gas Car No Car NY MIC TEX CAL 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% CAL TEX MIC NY EV 4.7% 2.0% 1.7% 2.8% PHEV 13.0% 6.6% 6.4% 8.5% Gas Car 70.0% 82.0% 82.4% 78.8% No Car 12.2% 9.4% 9.6% 9.9%

Choice Probability Simulation 2 Scenario 2 (Modest innovation) EV PHEV Gas Car No Car NY MIC TEX CAL 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% CAL TEX MIC NY EV 16.7% 10.4% 9.8% 12.7% PHEV 45.9% 35.1% 37.6% 38.9% Gas Car 31.8% 48.9% 47.2% 43.0% No Car 5.6% 5.6% 5.5% 5.4%

Choice Probability Simulation 3 Scenario 3 (Radical innovation) EV PHEV Gas Car No Car NY MIC TEX CAL 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% CAL TEX MIC NY EV 22.9% 17.6% 16.4% 19.7% PHEV 63.1% 59.2% 63.1% 60.6% Gas Car 11.9% 20.9% 18.3% 17.5% No Car 2.1% 2.4% 2.1% 2.2%