Review of Motorcycle Noise Regulation in Japan (Review of UN R41-04 Limit Value)

Similar documents
The trend of noise regulation in Japan

Study on Pass-by Noise Testing Methods Incorporating Urban Driving Conditions Test method of N2 category

Categorization of Light N1 Vehicles. 58 th GRB (2 4 September 2013) JASIC

Japan proposal for. Flat Front Light N1 Vehicle

UN Regulation (UNR) for Hydrogen Fuelled Vehicles of Categories L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5

December 2015 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism

STUDY ON EURO 5 SOUND LEVEL LIMITS OF L-CATEGORY VEHICLES

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

Revised proposal to amend UN Global Technical Regulation No. 3 (Motorcycle brake systems) I. Statement of technical rationale and justification

STUDY ON EURO 5 SOUND LEVEL LIMITS OF L-CATEGORY VEHICLES PROGRESS AND CBA RESULTS

ACEA Tyre Performance Study

Reducing Noise Emissions. Commission legislative proposal

Economic and Social Council

Proposal for amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2018/9. I. Statement of technical rationale and justification

Proposal for UN Regulation on AEBS for M1/N1

Proposal for Amendment to UN Regulation No. 46 (Devices for indirect vision)

Development of the Japan s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure

HARMONOISE -IMAGINE road source model

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.78/Rev.2/Amend.3 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.78/Rev.2/Amend.3

Interim Report by GRB IWG ASEP About UN R51.03 ASEP by Paragraph Last Sentence Informal Document to GRB 68 (Sep-2018)

China Proposal for Micro-Van and Micro-Truck

Economic and Social Council

Effect of variants for an Lurban ASEP approach

WLTP DHC subgroup. Draft methodology to develop WLTP drive cycle

Technical Information

Remote Control Parking (RCP)

Automated Driving UNECE International Harmonization

Units of Instruction MISD Pacing Guide Days Date Range Test Date

Some proposals to improve efficiency of road vehicle noise regulation

Road Vehicle noise Regulations and standardization Impacts and Stakes

Additional Sound Emission Provisions in the new European type approval method for exterior noise of road vehicles

Japanese proposal on R51 limit values

New EU Regulation on General Safety. Implementation of Tyre Aspects

Amendments to special provisions on the carriage of vehicles

Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad-hoc group on LKAS/RCP

Task Force on Electro-magnetic Compatibility (TF EMC) Status report of TF to GRE-75 Friday, 8 April 2016

Current Situation of Vehicle Safety Standards Harmonization

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

Draft programme of work (PoW) under the 1998 Agreement

The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79

Total Production by Month (Acre Feet)

Christian Theis 52 nd GRB, 6-8 September 2010, ASEP outline. Summary & Conclusion

Economic and Social Council

Proposals for amendments to Regulation No. 63

SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE Fourteenth session Bonn, July 2001 Item 3 (b) of the provisional agenda

Economic and Social Council

International Harmonization of Exhaust Emissions Test Procedures for Passenger Vehicle (M1) and Light Trucks (N1)

AGENDA REPORT. Craig Crowder, Fleet Manager %-

Economic and Social Council

Informal Document ACSF Automatically Commanded Steering Function

Study of Pedestrian s fatal accidents (vs. motor vehicles at low speed) in Japan

Economic and Social Council

Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG)

- Status Report - System Power Determination of Electrified (Light Duty) Vehicles. Subgroup Leader: Germany, Korea. EVE-17 meeting

Control 1 Containers

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

September 2016 Water Production & Consumption Data

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

Economic and Social Council

ECE/TRANS/180/Add.3/Amend.2

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

Continued coordination and facilitation with City of Austin staff on documentation of processes to permit construction activities at the site.

Inventory Levels - All Prices. Inventory Levels - By Price Range

Hydrogen & Fuel Cell Standards Update. Julie Weis, Sara Marxen, and Julie Cairns August 2014

PET(S) FIRST & LAST NAME: January 2019

Indian Tyre Production Estimate

Status Report of the VIAQ (Vehicle Interior Air Quality) Informal Working Group

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

Economic and Social Council

EU Work priorities for for UNECE activities. 1. Working Group on Automated and connected vehicles (GRVA)

Economic and Social Council

Summary Statistics. Closed Sales. Paid in Cash. Median Sale Price. Average Sale Price. Dollar Volume. Median Percent of Original List Price Received

China is finding common solutions for Sub-categories of M1 and N1 Categories

Monthly Market Detail - June 2018 Single Family Homes Miami-Dade County

Monthly Market Detail - June 2018 Townhouses and Condos Miami-Dade County

Japanese proposal on R51 limit values ~Rationality of Thresholds for N2 and M3~

IWG TYREGTR 17 th Meeting* Brussels, ETRTO Office, 2-3 November 2017 Report of the Chair

Proposal for the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79

Submitted by the Medical Device Battery Transport Council (MDBTC) *

forwarddallas! Implementation Proposed Chapter 43 Code Amendment On-Street Parking Transportation and Environment Committee Briefing January 14, 2008

SPECIFICATION OF PARTS, COMPONENTS OR ASSEMBLIES AND RELEVANT STANDARDS FOR MANUFACTURE OF VEHICLES 1

Reducing Noise Emissions from Motor Vehicles New EU Legislative proposal

Economic and Social Council

The Ministry of Transport does not anticipate that the Amendment Rule will have any effect on economic growth.

WLTP PEV Range test procedure : End of test criteria

Economic and Social Council

Analysis of Swiss vehicle database for ECE-R51/02 and proposals for noise limit values from EC, Ger, Jap

Algebra II Pacing Guide

7th Grade Social Studies Pacing Guide Units of Instruction MISD Pacing Guide Days Date Range Test Date

Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 (steering equipment) Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1

AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY. Guidelines for onboard sampling and the verification of the sulphur content of the fuel oil used on board ships

IMO MEPC 66 Summary Report on Ship Recycling

SPEED LIMIT CHANGES - RURAL ROADS OFF STATE HIGHWAY 58 AND COROGLEN RISE (OFF AIRLIE ROAD)

Transcription:

Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRB-66-08 (66th GRB, 4-6 September 2017, agenda item 10) Review of Motorcycle Noise Regulation in Japan (Review of UN R41-04 Limit Value)

Contents 1. Introduction - Outline of Current Noise Regulations in Japan 2. Items to be Considered in the Future - Contents to be Considered - Deliberation Schedule (Reference) Survey Contents 3. Summary 2

1. Introduction Outline of Current Noise Regulations in Japan (New Vehicles) - Noise Regulation Method prior to Introduction of UN Regulation Regulation method Accelerating vehicle noise Outline Regulate the noise generated when a vehicle with the acceleration pedal fully depressed has passed to reduce noise from an accelerating vehicle. Cruising vehicle noise Regulate the noise generated when a vehicle has passed at a constant speed (50 km/h) to reduce noise from a cruising vehicle. Proximity stationary noise Measure the noise generated near the exhaust pipe outlet of a vehicle at a halt when the accelerator is quickly released after the engine speed has reached a certain level to clamp down on illegally modified vehicles on the street. Proximity stationary noise test (No test track is required.) - Cruising noise regulation was abolished for two-wheelers in 2013 and fourwheelers in 2015. - Proximity stationary noise regulation was abolished for both two-wheelers and four-wheelers in 2015. - Current Noise Regulation Method after Introduction of UN Regulation (New vehicles) Harmonizing with International Standards The Japanese noise regulations harmonize with international noise regulations, with R41-04 for two-wheelers, R51-03 for four-wheelers and R117-02 for tyre noise being adopted as testing methods and limit values. 3

2. Items to be Considered in the Future Contents to be Considered (These issues were raised in Informal Document GRB-62-12 at 62 nd GRB held in September 2015.) Noise Measures for New Vehicles - Review of motorcycle noise regulation (Review of R41-04 Limit Value where necessary) Noise Measures for Vehicles in Current Usage - Review of check system for issues such as muffler performance (review of replacement muffler system where necessary) - Consideration of effective date of tyre noise regulation for noise outside of vehicles in current usage (application of R117-02 on vehicles in current usage) 4

2. Items to be Considered in the Future Deliberation Schedule - Schedule proposed by Japan (draft) Period Outline 25 April 2017 Specialist committee under Central Environment Council (CEC) will commence investigations related to review of motorcycle noise regulations May 2017 to August 2018 Hearings with relevant bodies will be held December 2017 to August 2018 September 2018 September 2018 to January 2020 February 2020 to March 2020 Japanese proposal related to review of limit value for R41-04 will be considered Japanese proposal for reviewing limit value for R41-04 based on the domestic study will be presented at Working Party on Noise (GRB) Based on state of discussion at GRB, Japan will consider proposal for reviewing limit value for R41-04 Collate review of Motorcycle Noise Regulation 5

2. Items to be Considered in the Future JAPAN GRB - Deliberation Schedule for Reviewing Limit Value for R41-04 in Japan and in GRB 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Review study Till March 2018 Deliberation on review of motorcycle noise regulation (Limit value for R41-04) Japanese proposal on reviewing limit value (in Sep.) if necessary Until Feb. or March 2020 Deliberation on reviewing limit value for R41-04 (list of future issues) within five years from 2018 6

(Reference) Survey Contents Study on Reviewing R41-04 Limit Value - Noise Fact-Finding Investigation on Vehicles that conform to Latest Noise Regulations (R41-04) Regulation classification of R41-04 Type Number of vehicles Number of motorcycle manufacturers Class 3 (50<PMR) Class 2 (25<PMR 50) Class 1 (PMR 25) Small 2-wheeler 4 4 2-wheeler 3 3 2 2 Motorcycle, less than or equal to 125cc 6 3 Motorcycle, less than or equal to 50cc 2 1 7

(Reference) Survey Contents Limit value (74 db) - measured value for acceleration noise Limit value (77 db) - measured value for acceleration noise The results of Noise Fact-Finding Investigation. (Relationship between Lrban and Lwot) class 2 (25<PMR 50) class 3 (50<PMR) (2-wheeler) (Small 2-wheeler) Average (Motorcycle, less than or equal to 125 cc) Average (2-wheeler) Upper limit value (limit value [74 db] + 5 db) - measured value for fully open acceleration [db] Upper limit value (limit value [77 db] + 5 db) - measured value for fully open acceleration [db] -Noise fact-finding investigations on 10 more motorcycles are planned and noise value distribution status to be considered by March 2018. -Based on the study above, estimates to be made on the impact to road traffic noise by boosting noise limit values for 2-wheelers. 8

(Reference) Survey Contents Hearings Survey Results from the Relevant Bodies Cumulative Frequency Curve of the TA Value of the Motorcycles (L3 category) Sold in Japan Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Current Limit Value 73dB 74dB 77dB -1dB 72dB (100%) 73dB (100%) 76dB (92.4%) -2dB 71dB (75.0%) 72dB (78.8%) 75dB (77.95%) 9

3. Summary - We are considering reviewing the limit value for 2-wheeler acceleration noise regulation (UN R41-04), in the belief that there is a need to continue working toward better noise reductions. - Japan hopes the consideration of reviewing limit value of UN R41-04 will start on schedule in 2018-2023 at GRB and that its deliberation schedule can be synchronized with the GRB deliberation schedule. - Regarding the review of limit value for UN R41-04 and for other issues related to R41, we hope that another discussion arena will enable efficient discussions in order to move the plan ahead at a pace suitable to the GRB deliberation schedule. - If there is to be discussions about measures for things like LAeq and LAmax within the deliberation on reviewing limit value for UN R41-04 at GRB, we would like to support such deliberations as well. 10

Thank you for your attention. 11