LSU AgCenter. Postemergence Command Combinations

Similar documents
LSU AgCenter. Early Postemergence Graminicide Combinations

Weed Science Annual Research Report

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Roundup Formulation and Tank Mix Test #1

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Valor PRE Test

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Rescue Treatments in Roundup Ready Soybeans

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Command Extra/Gauntlet Test

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. DuPont K4 Spring Timing Test

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Roundup GPA Test

Weed Science Annual Research Report

Crop Stage at Each Application A B C Crop Name: ZEAMX ZEAMX ZEAMX Height (In.): 12-15(14) 21-27(24) Stage (L): V5-6(6)8L V8 11L

Comments: Select Max (12 fl oz/a) + COC (1% v/v) was applied to the entire study to control grass weeds.

MSU Weed Science Research Program

HERBICIDE EVALUATION IN ARKANSAS RICE, 1999

Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application. Weed Density

Control of Little Barley in No-Till Wheat.

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel. Pest Description. Maintenance.

Glyphosate-Resistant Marestail, Waterhemp or Palmer Amaranth Control

MSU Weed Science Research Program Weed control and crop tolerance in Balance Beans - "Stewardship"

Southern Illinois University Marestail and Waterhemp Control in No-Till Enlist Soybeans with Burndown plus Residual.

No-Till Corn Burndown.

(11 BAS SB D9F Get the Most) Site Description Northeast Research & Extension Center. General Trial Information. Trial Location.

11/22/2009 (C18 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 13 University of Georgia. Managing GR Palmer amaranth in LL and RR cotton.

9/14/2009 (C39 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 5 University of Georgia Twelve inch GR Palmer amaranth response to burndown herbicides.

Southern Illinois University

(AG-02d-04) Site Description Page 1 North Carolina State University. Ignite/graminicide tank-mix interactions as affected by graminicide rates and AMS

Application Description. Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application

Glyphosate and 2,4-D Burndown.

Southern Illinois University Bicyclopyrone: Tolerance and Efficacy in Horseradish - Site 2 - Low Weed Pressure.

Miscellaneous, Including Horseradish and Wheat

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application. Weed Density

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel. Pest Description. Maintenance.

MSU Weed Science Research Program. General Trial Information. Personnel. Pest Description

Rice Weed and Pest Management Project

Influence of AMS on Drift Reduction Antagonisms.

Southern Illinois University

Crop Stage at Each Application

Weather conditions in May were relatively dry, and affected activation of the PRE herbicides.

Tillage: No-till into corn stubble Fertilizer: None at planting

9/12/2009 (C8 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 5 University of Georgia

MSU Weed Science Research Program Comparison of bentazon formulations in dry edible beans

H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 H1 H2 H3 10 FT BORDER FRONT

Crop Description. Soil Moisture: Moist Emergence Date: 17/Jun/2003

(BD-04b-04) Site Description Page 1 North Carolina State University. Comparison of 2,4-D formulations for burndown. Conducted Under GEP (Y/N): N

Southern Illinois University. Trial Location

Trial Location. Objectives: Evaluate efficacy of Engenia in sequential programs compared to early postemergence plus residual programs.

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center

Oct (16S-TPAC-CORN-16) ARM Site Description Page 1 of 13 Purdue Weed Science. One Pass vs. Two Pass Programs for Conventional Till Corn

(09 SRR-5 UPI KFD Soy BD) Site Description Page 1 of 21 Northeast Research & Extension Center

1/Jun/2005 (03-PPAC-CORN-BURC) Site Description Page 1 of 10 Purdue University Burcucumber control in corn

Alfalfa (06-7) Southern Illinois University. Roundup Ready Alfalfa Evaluation. Investigator: Bryan Young

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center Postemergence Weed Control in Green Pea

Nov (16S-CORT-SOY-08) ARM Site Description Page 1 of 15 Purdue Weed Science. Xtend Soybean System Compared to Competitor.

(03 08 CRR-03 MAN Parallel Heavy South Pivot) Site Description Northeast Research & Extension Center

(01-ASC-15) Date June 27

Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2015.

Rice Weed and Pest Management Project

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

(TURF2002) AOV Means Table Page 1 of 2 University of Georgia, CES Crabgrass Control in Bermudagrass with Preemergence Herbicides.

Comparison of weed control programs with herbicides containing bicyclopyrone and their standards in field corn in SE Minnesota in 2013

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

All treatments injured soybean on at least one evaluation. POST1 Synchrony STS plus Flexstar plus Assure II caused 15% injury on July 11.

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

2 CGA WG 10 G A/A 0 c 0 b 0 a 0 b 0 a. 3 CGA WG 12 G A/A 0 c 0 b 0 a 0 b 0 a. 4 CGA WG 7 G A/A 0 c 0 b 0 a 0 b 0 a

Evaluation of Preemergence and Postemergence Systems in Field Corn in SUMMARY

Crop Stage at Each Application. Weed Stage at Each Application

General Trial Information Study Director: Dustin Johnson Title: Research Associate Investigator: Dr. Bill Johnson Title: Professor

Planting Date: Planting Method: Broadcast Rate: 10 lb/1000 sq ft

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.

(TURF1402) Site Description Page 1 of 5 University of GA Coop Ext Service Poa annua Control in Overseeded 'Tifway' Bermudagrass.

HARD APPLICATION BAREGROUND TREATMENTS COMPARING AE WP AND ROUNDUP PRO COMBINATIONS Trial ID: 09-T6 Protocol ID: 09-T6

Date 5/21 Treatment. POST I Temperature (F) Air 65 Soil 70.2 Relative Humidity (%) 50 Wind (mph) 8 Soil Moisture. Adequate Corn

University of Georgia, CES Evaluation of Homeowner Preemergence Herbicide Formulations for Crabgrass Control in Common Bermudagrass.

(FORAG9-02) AOV Means Table Page 1 of 4 University of Georgia, CES Tolerance of newly-sprigged forage bermudagrass to broadleaf herbicides.

Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Jeffrey L. Gunsolus, Reed Searcy, and Jared Liebenow

GENERAL TRIAL INFORMATION

Table 2. Evaluation of herbicide systems to control giant ragweed in soybeans at Rochester, MN in Pest Code AMBTR YIELD Pest Name Giant ragweed

WEED SCIENCE Annual Research Report

Comparison of Weed Management Programs to Halex GT Herbicide in Field Corn in SE Minnesota in 2010 Date 4/21 5/22 6/3 6/16 Treatment

104 Sturgis Hall Baton Rouge, LA

Table 1 Location: MILAN EXPERIMENT STATION University of Tennessee

2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Table 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2016.

WEED SCIENCE Annual Research Report

CONCLUSIONS No crop response was observed at any time for any of the treatments in this trial.

Cooperator/Landowner Cooperator: Mel Grove Organization: ISK Biosciences City: Houston State/Prov: TX

2015 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

(Forage2-06) Site Description Page 1 of 5 University of GA Coop Ext Service. Dogfennel Control in Pastures

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD RESEARCH REPORT

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Yield 1

Herbicides and Weed Control. Jim Heiser

Variety testing of Lolium perenne, Dactylis glomerata and Festuca arundinacea

CRW/Standard Efficacy Final Report 5 December 2011

University of GA Coop Ext Service

1. Ignite 280 = glufosinate [BAYER] 2. OpTill = saflufenacil (Sharpen) + imazethapyr (Pursuit) [BASF]

Transcription:

Experiment number... : C03-26 Location... : RRS - Crowley, LA Experimental design... : RCB Number of reps... : 4 Plot size... : 5 x 17 Row width/# per plot... : 7.5 /8 Soil type... : Crowley silt loam (3% sand, 69% silt, 28% clay) % OM... : 1.4 ph... : 6.4 CEC... : 19.1 Planting date... : 04/14/03 Harvest date... : N/A Crop/Variety... : Rice/Cocodrie Emergence date... : 04/24/03 Uniform std. treatment... : N/A Application type... : EPOT Date applied [mm/dd/yy]... : 05/07/03 Time [hh:mm-hh:mm]... : 8:16-8:35a Incorporation equip./depth... : N/A Air/Soil temperature [F]... : 76/77 Relative humidity [%]... : 67 Wind [mph, direction]... : 5,S Weather [sunny, etc]... : cloudy Soil/Leaf surface moist... : moist/dry Crop stage/height... : 2-3lf/3-4 Sprayer type/mph... : CO 2 BkPk/3.0 Nozzle type/size... : FF/110015 TD Boom ht/# Noz/Spacing... : 17 /5/15 GPA/PSI... : 15/28 Applied by... : Zhang Weed Species (population)... :-(height/#leaves)- LEFPA (40-60 m -2 )... : 1-3 /2-3lf ECHCG (10-20 m -2 )... : 2-4 /3-4lf CYPIR (10-15 m -2 )... : 1-2 /2-5lf ECLAL (20-35 m -2 )... : 1-2 /cot-2lf SEBEX (3-7 m -2 )... : 1-2 /cot-3lf Flush Dates... : 04/16/03; 04/29/03; 05/09/03 Permanent Flood... : 05/22/03

Department of Agronomy Trial ID: C03-26 Location: RRS-Crowley, LA Investigator: Eric P. Webster Weed Code ECHCG BRAPP LEFPA Rating Data Type CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL Rating Unit % % % Rating Date 05/26/03 05/26/03 05/26/03 Trt-Eval Interval 19DAEPOT 19DAEPOT 19DAEPOT Trt Treatment Form Form Product Product Grow No. Name Conc Type Rate Rate Unit Stg 1 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 56 60 56 1 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 2 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 71 74 69 2 Aim 2 EC 1.6 fl oz/a EPOT 2 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 3 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 65 78 58 3 Facet 75 DF 8 oz/a EPOT 3 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 4 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 90 90 90 4 Ricestar 0.58 EC 13 fl oz/a EPOT 4 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 5 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 90 90 88 5 Clincher 2.38 EC 10 fl oz/a EPOT 5 COC L 48 fl oz/a EPOT 6 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 80 85 84 6 Regiment 80 WP 0.397 oz/a EPOT 6 Kinetic L 2.4 fl oz/a EPOT 7 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 90 90 90 7 Arrosolo 6 EC 2 qt/a EPOT 7 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 8 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 70 64 70 8 Permit 75 DG 1 oz/a EPOT 8 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 9 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 64 63 64 9 Londax 60 DF 1 oz/a EPOT 9 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 10 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 90 90 90 10 Stam 4 EC 3 qt/a EPOT 11 Nontreated 0 0 0

LSD (P=.05) 8.9 11.0 10.6 Standard Deviation 6.2 7.6 7.4 CV 8.89 10.71 10.71 Replicate F 3.098 0.562 1.490 Replicate Prob(F) 0.0416 0.6444 0.2372 Treatment F 71.514 48.120 51.234 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

Department of Agronomy Trial ID: C03-26 Location: RRS-Crowley, LA Investigator: Eric P. Webster Weed Code CYPIR ALRPH RICE Rating Data Type CONTROL CONTROL INJURY Rating Unit % % % Rating Date 05/26/03 05/26/03 05/26/03 Trt-Eval Interval 19DAEPOT 19DAEPOT 19DAEPOT Trt Treatment Form Form Product Product Grow No. Name Conc Type Rate Rate Unit Stg 1 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 71 55 2 1 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 2 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 73 71 2 2 Aim 2 EC 1.6 fl oz/a EPOT 2 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 3 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 69 78 3 3 Facet 75 DF 8 oz/a EPOT 3 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 4 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 70 74 2 4 Ricestar 0.58 EC 13 fl oz/a EPOT 4 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 5 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 63 53 1 5 Clincher 2.38 EC 10 fl oz/a EPOT 5 COC L 48 fl oz/a EPOT 6 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 84 88 2 6 Regiment 80 WP 0.397 oz/a EPOT 6 Kinetic L 2.4 fl oz/a EPOT 7 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 85 71 2 7 Arrosolo 6 EC 2 qt/a EPOT 7 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 8 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 76 65 3 8 Permit 75 DG 1 oz/a EPOT 8 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 9 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 79 78 2 9 Londax 60 DF 1 oz/a EPOT 9 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 10 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 80 84 3 10 Stam 4 EC 3 qt/a EPOT 11 Nontreated 0 0 0

LSD (P=.05) 6.8 9.2 1.5 Standard Deviation 4.7 6.4 1.0 CV 6.92 9.85 54.47 Replicate F 5.701 3.216 1.324 Replicate Prob(F) 0.0033 0.0367 0.2851 Treatment F 100.262 56.667 2.347 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0347

Department of Agronomy Trial ID: C03-26 Location: RRS-Crowley, LA Investigator: Eric P. Webster Weed Code ECHCG BRAPP LEFPA Rating Data Type CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL Rating Unit % % % Rating Date 06/23/03 06/23/03 06/23/03 Trt-Eval Interval 48DAEPOT 48DAEPOT 48DAEPOT Trt Treatment Form Form Product Product Grow No. Name Conc Type Rate Rate Unit Stg 1 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 54 75 39 1 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 2 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 43 21 49 2 Aim 2 EC 1.6 fl oz/a EPOT 2 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 3 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 75 70 15 3 Facet 75 DF 8 oz/a EPOT 3 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 4 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 91 97 95 4 Ricestar 0.58 EC 13 fl oz/a EPOT 4 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 5 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 93 96 88 5 Clincher 2.38 EC 10 fl oz/a EPOT 5 COC L 48 fl oz/a EPOT 6 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 84 36 11 6 Regiment 80 WP 0.397 oz/a EPOT 6 Kinetic L 2.4 fl oz/a EPOT 7 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 85 93 88 7 Arrosolo 6 EC 2 qt/a EPOT 7 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 8 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 29 31 14 8 Permit 75 DG 1 oz/a EPOT 8 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 9 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 34 31 33 9 Londax 60 DF 1 oz/a EPOT 9 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 10 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 93 97 91 10 Stam 4 EC 3 qt/a EPOT 11 Nontreated 0 0 0

LSD (P=.05) 11.7 14.6 12.6 Standard Deviation 8.1 10.1 8.7 CV 13.08 17.15 18.35 Replicate F 1.317 0.226 0.662 Replicate Prob(F) 0.2872 0.8775 0.5820 Treatment F 62.015 49.808 71.096 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

Department of Agronomy Trial ID: C03-26 Location: RRS-Crowley, LA Investigator: Eric P. Webster Weed Code CYPIR ALRPH RICE Rating Data Type CONTROL CONTROL INJURY Rating Unit % % % Rating Date 06/23/03 06/23/03 06/23/03 Trt-Eval Interval 48DAEPOT 48DAEPOT 48DAEPOT Trt Treatment Form Form Product Product Grow No. Name Conc Type Rate Rate Unit Stg 1 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 0 4 0 1 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 2 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 68 11 0 2 Aim 2 EC 1.6 fl oz/a EPOT 2 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 3 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 39 79 0 3 Facet 75 DF 8 oz/a EPOT 3 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 4 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 0 0 0 4 Ricestar 0.58 EC 13 fl oz/a EPOT 4 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 5 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 0 0 0 5 Clincher 2.38 EC 10 fl oz/a EPOT 5 COC L 48 fl oz/a EPOT 6 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 94 84 0 6 Regiment 80 WP 0.397 oz/a EPOT 6 Kinetic L 2.4 fl oz/a EPOT 7 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 90 35 0 7 Arrosolo 6 EC 2 qt/a EPOT 7 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 8 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 95 30 0 8 Permit 75 DG 1 oz/a EPOT 8 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 9 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 91 59 0 9 Londax 60 DF 1 oz/a EPOT 9 Ag-98 L 4.8 fl oz/a EPOT 10 Command 3 ME 12.8 fl oz/a EPOT 71 24 0 10 Stam 4 EC 3 qt/a EPOT 11 Nontreated 0 0 0

LSD (P=.05) 9.3 14.6 0.0 Standard Deviation 6.4 10.1 0.0 CV 12.91 34.2 0.0 Replicate F 2.110 0.816 0.000 Replicate Prob(F) 0.1198 0.4950 1.0000 Treatment F 175.591 38.771 0.000 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 1.0000