THE SPANISH DEMERIT POINT SYSTEM

Similar documents
Road fatalities in 2012

The Spanish Demerit Point System

DRINK-DRIVING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

The 3 rd European Road Safety Action Programme

THE ROAD SAFETY POLICY IN SPAIN. Rome, 9 th April 2009

Alcohol Interlocks and the fight against Drink-Driving

Common Safety Indicators (CSIs) as reported by Member States Extracted on 18 October 2013 from ERAIL database (

Strategic Planning Directorate General of Traffic. VI International Conference of European Traffic Policies Barcelona, 16 May 2014

Road safety in Greece

ROAD SAFETY ANNUAL REPORT 2018 LITHUANIA

The SafeCulture project Results on safety culture in professional transport in Greece

1 Background and definitions

Road safety in Europe. Graziella Jost, ETSC, PIN Programme Manager

RSWGM meeting European Commission DG MOVE 3-4 April 2017

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. Euro Area (EA) February 2014: Economic Sentiment broadly unchanged in the euro area and the EU

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. Euro Area (EA) European Union (EU)

Alcohol Interlocks & Building Capacity for Automated Solutions

10th Eastern Partnership Transpot Panel

Points-based driving licence

December 2011 compared with November 2011 Industrial producer prices down by 0.2% in both euro area and EU27

Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2008

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. February 2019: Economic Sentiment broadly stable in the euro area, down in the EU

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. September 2018: Economic Sentiment decreases in both the euro area and the EU

Tackling the Three Main Killers on the roads - A priority for the forthcoming EU Road Safety Action Programme Klaus Machata Austrian Road Safety

Traffic Safety Basic Facts Main Figures. Urban Areas. Country Overview. Cyprus

September 2011 compared with August 2011 Industrial producer prices up by 0.3% in euro area Up by 0.4% in EU27

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. August 2011

Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2010

A GUIDE TO SUSPENSION & REVOCATION OF DRIVING PRIVILEGES IN NEW YORK STATE

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS

Road Safety Country Overview October Greece. Population: 11.3 million inhabitants (2010) 17.1 million (2010 i ) [1,2] Area: km 2 (2010)

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. August 2013: Economic Sentiment rises further in both the euro area and the EU

Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2004

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS

Consumer confidence indicator

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. Euro Area (EA) June 2014: Economic Sentiment decreasing in the euro area, while stable in the EU

Single vehicle accidents

Response to. Ministry of Justice Consultation Paper. Driving Offences and Penalties Relating to Causing Death or Serious Injury

Traffic Safety Basic Facts Main Figures. Traffic Safety Basic Facts Road Safety. Urban Areas. Country Overview.

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. April 2011

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. Euro Area (EA) European Union (EU) September 2015: Economic Sentiment improves in the euro area and the EU

The judge must hold a sentencing hearing to determine if there are aggravating or mitigating factors that affect the sentence.

Paris, 26th S eptember September 2008

Why are you proposing to make alcohol interlocks mandatory for drink drive offences?

OECD TRANSPORT DIVISION RTR PROGRAMME ROAD SAFETY PERFORMANCE - TRENDS AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Alcohol Interlock Program. Participant Guide

Traffic Safety Basic Facts Main Figures. Traffic Safety Basic Facts Road Safety. Urban Areas. Country Overview.

Impaired Driving. Tough consequences Impaired Driver Assessments

Safe and Sober Transport Alcohol Interlock Seminar. Marko Sillanpää Director General, Transport System

Characteristics and causes of power two wheeler accidents in Europe

Safe Driving Policy. 1. Objectives of the policy. 2. Code of conduct. 3. Responsibilities as an employee. Rev. Number 4 Page: Page 1 of 5

Remedial and Ignition Interlock Programs Policies and Guidelines

Driver Improvement and Control. Program

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. Euro Area (EA) European Union (EU)

THE MYTHS OF PHOTO RADAR EXPOSED

HEAVY VEHICLE DRIVERS INVOLVED IN ROAD CRASHES IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Percentage of crashes with driving too fast for the conditions cited as a contributing factor ( ) 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Percentage

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material images contained in the material are not copied

THE PRIVATE LIFE OF DEMERIT POINTS

ROAD SAFETY THE EUROPEAN UNION POLICY

First Trends H2020 vs FP7: winners and losers

A) New zero tolerance drug presence laws for young and novice drivers. Create a new regulation to define and permit the use of federally

Break The Law, Pay The Price

To reduce and eliminate at-fault crash, costs and injuries by promoting a safe driving culture within the organisation.

Regulations to Tackle Drink Driving in Northern Ireland. RoSPA s Response to the Department for Environment (Northern Ireland) Consultation Paper

The Swedish Transport Agency and our work with an alcohol interlock program. Pär-Ola Skarviken

Single vehicle accidents

BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS. November 2013: Economic Sentiment improves in the euro area and the EU

Section 1 Scope of application

February 2014 Euro area unemployment rate at 11.9% EU28 at 10.6%

Impaired Driving. Tough consequences Impaired Driver Assessments

Protecting Vulnerable Road Users

Dutch Alcohol Interlock Program

Young drivers. Drivers involved in fatal or injury crashes. Drivers involved in fatal/injury crashes per 100. per licence holders (lines)

Road Safety Country Overview October Austria

711. USE OF VEHICLES ON SCHOOL BUSINESS

SAFE BRAKING WITH MOTORCYCLE ABS. Takatoshi Tagawa, Sales manager, Automotive Technologies

Chapter 6 Drinking & Drugs

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER. Technical Annex. Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Drink Driving in the EU

Safe System Approach. Claes Tingvall (Swedish Transport Administration) Peter Larsson (Swedish Transport Agency)

Respecting the Rules Better Road Safety Enforcement in the European Union. ACEA s Response

Current and planned policies on drink-driving & drug-driving. Desirée Schaap Projectleader alcolockprogram

GDL NEW DRIVERS Motorcycle Novice Stage (Stage 2) at a Glance

June 2014 Euro area unemployment rate at 11.5% EU28 at 10.2%

Traffic Safety Basic Facts Main Figures. Traffic Safety Basic Facts Road Safety. Urban Areas. Country Overview.

How enforcement can save lives

March 2013 Euro area unemployment rate at 12.1% EU27 at 10.9%

May 2014 Euro area unemployment rate at 11.6% EU28 at 10.3%

THE BALTIC SEA POWER RING CONNECTED: A GLANCE AT NORDBALT AND LITPOL LINK TODAY AND OUTLOOK FOR TOMORROW

Survey on passengers satisfaction with rail services. Analytical report. Flash Eurobarometer 326 The Gallup Organization

Alberta Speeding Convictions and Collisions Involving Unsafe Speed

EUROPEAN FISHERIES IN FIGURES

GRADUATED LICENSING. KITCHEN TABLE DISCUSSION GUIDE Have your say on Your PLates reforms

Whereas pursuant to Article 4b of Regulation (EEC) No 3164/76, as inserted by Regulation (EEC) No 1841/88, the Council must adopt the measures

Stronger road safety. in South Australia. Presented by Tamra Fedojuk Senior Statistician Road Safety Policy

Demerit. Points DRIVER S LICENCE

Adjusting and extending the LFS data used for the projections

Transcription:

THE SPANISH DEMERIT POINT SYSTEM D. Moreno, PhD. & H. Monterde, PhD. University of Valencia - Faculty of Psychology Psychonomy Research Unit. 19 th. ICTCT Workshop on National traffic safety programs: concepts and practice. Minsk, Belarus, 26 th. - 27 th. October 2006

19 th. ICTCT Workshop on National traffic safety programs: concepts and practice. Minsk, Belarus, 26 th. - 27 th. October 2006 The spanish Demerit Point System 1.- The Spanish sad data 2.- The strategic plan 3.- A shared solution 4.- The Spanish Point System: characteristics -Running the system /violations - Reeducation courses 5.- Discussion/ criticism D. Moreno, PhD. & H. Monterde, PhD. University of Valencia - Faculty of Psychology Psychonomy Research Unit.

Number of fatalities (road and urban areas) YEAR TOTAL accidents DEATHS 1988 171.297 6.348 1990 162.424 6.948 1992 135.963 6.014 1994 119.331 5.615 1996 129.640 5.483 1998 147.334 5.957 2000 155.557 5.776 2002 152.264 5.347 2004 143.124 4.741 Source: Statistical Yearbook 2004. DGT. Slight improvement BUT... STILL TOO MUCH!

Road fatalities-eu 25 country rankings based on three criteria 2003 Country ranking MT Per million inhabitants 40 Country ranking UK Per 100 million pkm* 54 Country ranking MT Per 100000 passenger cars 77 SE 59 SE 54 SE 130 UK 61 FI 63 UK 136 NL 63 NL 69 DE 148 FI 73 DK 70 NL 149 DE 80 DE 76 FI 167 DK 80 IT 78 IT 177 IE 84 FR 81 LU 181 FR 101 LU 86 FR 206 EU25 103 EU25 102 EU25 220 IT 105 MT 103 IE 224 AT 115 BE 110 DK 228 BE 117 AT 111 AT 230 LU 118 IE 139 BE 252 SK 120 ES 153 PT 257 EE 121 SI 154 SI 272 SI 121 PT 156 ES 289 ES 130 EE 162 CY 321 HU 131 CZ 202 EE 378 CY 134 EL 235 CZ 390 CZ 142 SK 251 EL 418 EL 146 HU 280 HU 477 PT 148 CY 293 SK 476 PL 149 PL 323 PL 506 LT 205 LT 360 LT 564 LV 229 LV 517 LV 820 Source: IRTAD, UN, European Commission, CARE, National Statistics.

Number of fatalities and injury accidents per country in 2003* as a proportion of the number in 1994 Spain EU14 average reducction

EU Transportation White Paper, 2001 Objetive: to reduce by 50% traffic deaths to year 2010 Too much traffic victims The Spanish Strategic Road Safety Plan 2005-2008 (DGT, 2004) A set of specific proposals that range from improvements in the safety of the vehicles and the infrastructures to improve the behaviour of the drivers

The Demerit Point System Is one of the outright bases of the Strategic plan to reduce the number of accidents on Spanish highways A PROVEN SOLUTION In fact, the results obtained in other countries with this system show this (the effectiveness of this system has been demonstrated in the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Italy)

Comparison among countries Point Systems Country and starting date United Kingdom (1982) France (1992) Germany (1999) Italy (1982) Spain (2006) Maximum number of Points to add or remove as a consequence of violations 12 (+) 12 (-) 18 (+) 20 (-) 12 (-) Novice drivers Limited to amount of 6pt. in the first two years 6 credit pts. 8 credit pts. Bonus for nice driving Yes (2 pts. By year, max 10) Yes (2 pts. First 3 years, one more for the next 3 years) Time without violations to reset points 3 years 3 years (up to 4 pts) Full recovery after 2 years. Except very serious violations (3 years)

Country and starting date To recover/remove points by course or seminar To reset points after license is withdrawn Consequences of total removal or total accumulation of points United Kingdom (1982) New exam and re- education course. (possibly medical exam) License withdrawal France (1992) Yes (max 4 pts) New exam (after 6 months) License withdrawal Germany (1999) 8-13 pts voluntary 14-17 pts compulsory Psychologica l assistance (- 2 pts) After 6 month suspension License withdrawal Italy (1982) Spain (2006) Yes (9 pts. For professionals, 6 for nonprofessionals) License withdrawal Yes: partial point recovery course (4 pts) and full point recovery course Theoretical exam after 6 months (first time, 12 for next time). Professionals: half the time (up to 8 points) License withdrawal Max points that can be lost/accumulated in a day Recording system Registered on the driver s license -15 pts. -8 pts Automatically, in the Central Registry of DGT for Drivers and Violators

Spanish Demerit Point System:Characteristics Running the system Baseline points standard drivers Novice drivers 12 points 8 points Earning points 3 years without serius or very serious traffic violations +2 pnts.= 14 A second period of 3 years without traffic violations 3 years without serius or very serious traffic violations They go to the beginning as standard drivers. +1 pt.=15 Note: There is also a recovering posibility, we ll see later

How points are lost Being caught committing or having committed one or more serious or very serious violations. Maximun 8 pts. In a day. On occasion (very serius violation) may result in license withdrawal (loosing all the baseline credit) The effects do not come along immediatly they must be well stablished by the Administration, allowing a period for drivers who would appeal.

VIOLATIONS / INFRACTIONS Serious violations (91-300 ) License withdrawal possible Very Serious violations (301-600 ) License withdrawal for 30 days min. Examples: -Not complying with limitations on speed, yielding right of way, passing, turning around or making a U-turn and backing up. -Carrying devices that are incompatible with attention: headphones, cell phones. -Running through a red light or a stop sign. Examples: -Driving with alcohol rates higher than what is permitted or under the influence of drugs. -Surpassing by more than 50 percent the maximum allowed speed, while exceeding the limit by at least 30 Km./h. -Not correctly identifying the driver responsible for the infraction.

Penalty point-violation correspondence 2 pts. less Exceeding the speed limit by between 21 and 30 km/h. Stopping or parking in high risk areas, for traffic circulation, pedestrians, or in lanes designated for public urban transportation. Using radar detection systems to avoid being observed by the traffic police. Not having the correct lighting or using it incorrectly. Carrying a child younger than 12 years of age as a passenger on a motorcycle or motorbike.

Penalty point-violation correspondence 3 pts. less Exceeding the speed limit by between 31 and 40 km/h. Turning around or making a U-turn without complying with the norms. Not maintaining a safe distance. Manually using the cell phone or any other device that does not allow one to pay attention to driving. Not wearing the seatbelt, helmet and other obligatory safety devices.

4 pts. less Penalty point-violation correspondence Exceeding the speed limit established by more than 40km/h, when this does not imply, in addition, an excess of 50%. Driving with a blood alcohol level superior to 0.25 mg/l and up to 0.50 mg/l in expelled air (professionals and novice drivers more than 0.15 and up to 0.30 mg/l.). Driving on a highway or motorway with a vehicle that is expressly prohibited on them. Driving a vehicle without the appropriate permit or license. Throwing on or near the road any object that can cause fires or accidents. Driving negligently or creating risks for others. Running through a stop sign or red traffic light or not respecting the yield sign. Passing by putting in danger or interfering with those who are driving in the other direction or in places or circumstances with reduced visibility. Passing by putting in danger or interfering with cyclists. Backing up on highways and motorways. Not respecting the indications of the officers directing traffic. Driving with an excess of 50% or more of the number of authorized seats, excluding the driver, except in the case of urban or intercity buses. Increasing speed or performing a manoeuvre that impedes or interferes with passing.

6 pts. less Penalty point-violation correspondence Driving faster than 50% over the authorized speed limit, but only when this means going at least 30km/h over this limit. Driving with a blood alcohol rate superior to 0.50 mg/l in expelled air (more than 0.30 mg/l for professionals and novice drivers). Driving under the influence of narcotics, psychotropic drugs, stimulants and other substances with analogous effects Refusing to undergo tests for alcohol, narcotics, stimulants and other substances with analogous effects. Driving recklessly, driving the wrong way (against traffic) or participating in unauthorized vehicle competitions or races. Exceeding the maximum driving time by more than 50% or reducing the rest times by more than 50% (Professional driver)

Reeducation course (How lost points can be recovered) Partial recovering Once every two years (one for professional) 12-hour course Up to 4 pts. After 2 years without losing point the initial credit (12pts.) is recovered If the lose of points was due to a very serious violation, the period will be 3 years

Reeducation course (How lost points can be recovered) License recovering After 6/12 month of license withdrawal (3/6 for professionals) 24-hour course + theoretical exam at local Traffic Headquarter 8 pts. Credit (Base line)

Courses structure Basic characteristics of the courses for partial recovery of points Common part Specific part 7 hours for general training about road safety issues 1 hour for reflection and group discussion. Associations of Road Traffic Accident Victims may be involved. 4 hours for individualized intervention according to the driver s special deficiencies or needs. Basic characteristics of the courses for recovering the driver license Common part Specific part 14 hours for general training about road safety issues 2 hours for group-dynamic reflection about the aims of the course. Associations of Road Traffic Accident Victims may be involved 8 hours for individualized intervention according to the driver s special deficiencies or needs

Contents of the courses 1.- Traffic accidents. 2.- Dynamic of the accidents and consequences for the victims. 3.- Driving as decision-making. 4.- Basic aptitudes and abilities. 5.- High-risk groups. 6.- Speed as a risk factor. 7.- Alcohol as a risk factor. 8.- Addictive drugs as a risk factor. 9.- Illnesses and medicines as a risk factor. 10.- Drowsiness as a risk factor. 11.- Fatigue as a risk factor. 12.- Stress as a risk factor. 13.- Active and passive safety. 14.- Defensive driving. 15.- Principles that rule traffic circulatio Social credit subjected to the degree of responsability and self control shown by drivers

Giving the courses; where and who. A civil organization that receives a concession by the Interior Ministry is in charge to give the courses, except in those autonomies with traffic competences transferred (Basque Country and Catalonia) Two types of teachers Trainer -Certificate as Traffic Education Teacher (teacher at a driving school) - Three years of experience Trainer_Psychologist -University Degree in Psychology. - Specific training course. -On january 2007 all centres will be open and allready working-

DISCUSSION AND CRITICISM A generaly accepted measure Acceptance by Spaniards of the demerit point system (in %) Year Very good Good Moderate Bad Very bad N.S. N.C. TOTAL 2004 26.2 44.8 7.1 7.7 3.3 10.3 0.7 100.0 2005 18.2 50.7 8.1 12.9 2.9 6.6 0.6 100.0 Source: CIS, December 2004, December 2005. Adapted Will the demerit point system help to reduce the number of accidents? Year Yes No Don`t know No Answer TOTAL 2004 64.0 22.5 12.9 0.5 100.0 2005 54.3 37.5 8.0 0.2 100.0 Source: CIS, December 2004, December 2005. Adapted

Coordination dificulties The autonomic structure of the state. - Central State, Catalonia & Basque Country: Traffic sanctioning competences -All 17 Autonomies: Transport sanctioning competences. -Not full computerized connections

Reeducational courses not Rehabilitation courses Reeducation Vs Rehabilitation Substitution of subversive beliefs with those more favorable to a certain party. Often used for political purposes. Procedures directed to restore or reestablish the health. Incoherence, reflected in the statment of individualized intervention according to the driver s special deficiencies or needs. Not forseen any prior exploration to determine the typology of the infractor. Associations of Road Traffic Accident Victims may be involved (Who is going to coordinate them?

Legal facts A requisite for holding a driver license. The lost of points is not a real sanction though the citizen`s posibility of defense and appeal to the courts of justice disappears. Discriminatory. Not for drivers from other countries Picaresque (Cunning). New delictive behaviours about the points value

EVIDENCES Under a DPS, when demerit points are accumulated up to a certain threshold, the number of subsequent violations tends to decrease dramatically (Zaal, 1994; Vaa, 2000; Vaa and Glad, 1995). Haque (1987) showed that the time interval between a second and third offence was statistically longer than that between the first and second offence. This effect has been observed also in Germany where about 13% of drivers have been caught infringing traffic rules, buy only 0.3% of infringers resulted having further accumulates demerit points up to the maximum amount permitted (Zaal, 1994). An empirical investigation on the relationship between demerit points accrual and crash involvement has show that the correlation between accumulation of demerit points during 1991-1992 and the probability of being involved in crash during 1993-1994 is positive but decreasing in the number of points (Diamantopoulou, Cameron, Dyte and Harrison, 1997). Finally a recent study made in Australia, has reported that 50% of the sample investigated received penalty points at some stage in their driving career, 21% of which reported having a current record of some accumulated points, while only 6% resulted having lost their driving license due to the cumulated amount of points (NRMA, 2002).

ANNEXES

Marcello Basili and Antonio Nicita (June, 2005) Understanding Deterrence and Compliance under a Demerit Point System Preliminary Draft, Dept. of Economics, University of Siena The authors attempt to provide an explanation for the compliance effect observed in available data, as they they assure their conclusion could be easily referred also to totting-up systems. We assume that for at least some group of agents, demerit points are a sort of input to deploy in order to obtain new consumption opportunities and that the opportunity cost of consuming points is increasing with their consumption. Marcello Basili and Antonio Nicita (June, 2005)

Marcello Basili and Antonio Nicita (June, 2005)

In order to deter both non conformist deterred and non conformist non deterred agents it is necessary: To increase the opportunity costs of reloading control, i.e. increase the time length after suspension or the period of ban (that is the deterrence effect against non deterred agents) To reduce the possibility to restore points and to assign merit points (that is the deterrence effect against deterred agents).

200 PENALTY RELATED TO SPEEDING 50% Speed limit and >30 k/h. Absolute speed 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 50 2-4 points area 6 points- licence withdrawal area 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Excess of speed in k/h.