ESTIMATION RESULTS: THE DESIGN OF A COMPREHENSIVE MICROSIMULATOR OF HOUSEHOLD VEHICLE FLEET COMPOSITION, UTILIZATION, AND EVOLUTION

Similar documents
On Assessing the Impact of Transportation Policies on Fuel Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Using a Household Vehicle Fleet Simulator

A Joint Tour-Based Model of Vehicle Type Choice, Tour Length, Passenger Accompaniment, and Tour Type

Assessing the Impact of Transportation Policies on Fuel Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Using a Household Vehicle Fleet Simulator

DEVELOPMENT OF A VEHICLE FLEET COMPOSITION MODEL SYSTEM: RESULTS FROM AN OPERATIONAL PROTOTYPE

DEVELOPMENT OF A VEHICLE FLEET COMPOSITION MODEL SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTATION IN AN ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVEL MODEL

Demand for High Fuel Economy Vehicles

201 SOUTH MARY STREET Sunnyvale, CA

Factors Affecting Vehicle Use in Multiple-Vehicle Households

OLYMPIC GATEWAY PLAZA

Tony Roma s (Closed) Fully Equipped Restaurant Building

LAGUNA HONDA. Commercial Property For Sale SAN FRANCISCO, CA

Do U.S. Households Favor High Fuel Economy Vehicles When Gasoline Prices Increase? A Discrete Choice Analysis

L O S A N G E L E S U N I F I E D S C H O O L D I S T R I C T. Business Services Division Transportation Branch BUS REPLACEMENT PLAN

Cal Poly Enrollment Projections

JIFFY LUBE 670 W RAY ROAD GILBERT, AZ 85233

HDR Lunch and Learn April 23, Lori Clark, Program Manager, Transportation North Central Texas Council of Governments

Percentage of Children and Youth Ages 0 to 24 years old Using Seat Belts or Restraints, Selected Years,

DEFENSE AGENCIES Fleet Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Report Compliance with EPAct and E.O in Fiscal Year 2008

Can Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) Revenues Improve Market for Electric Vehicles?

American Driving Survey: Methodology and Year One Results, May 2013 May Saving lives through research and education.

Online appendix for "Fuel Economy and Safety: The Influences of Vehicle Class and Driver Behavior" Mark Jacobsen

2014 Bay Area Council Survey Report of Selected Results: Energy and Communications

Activity-Travel Behavior Impacts of Driverless Cars

Montgomery County Department of General Services DGS Delivering Green Service

Summit Inn Hotel & Suites

94,250 SF FOR LEASE OR SALE 4900 S SOTO STREET, VERNON, CA 90058

The Green Dividend. Cities facilitate less driving, saving money and stimulating the local economy. Joseph Cortright, Impresa September 2007

Table 2 CLUSTER GROUP NUMBER

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FISCAL YEAR 2005 FUEL REPORTS EQUIPMENT FUEL USAGE

American Driving Survey,

Retail Site Analysis. Filling Station Car Wash FM 1092 Missouri City, Texas 77459

2.445 Acres Commercial Shaenfield Road San Antonio, Texas

Demographics Booklet

FOR SALE. Prime Camp Bowie Retail Camp Bowie Blvd. W. Fort Worth, Texas Dick Myers

Environmental Science Lab: Buying a Car.

TRANSIT DEMAND IN RURAL DOUGLAS COUNTY: PRELIMINARY BACKGROUND DATA

Alamo Natural Gas Vehicle Consortium

Passenger seat belt use in Durham Region

Nacogdoches Second Generation Restaurant Space 1208 N University Dr, Nacogdoches, TX 75961

Your Driving Costs. How much are you really paying to drive? Behind the Numbers

A Survey of Electric Vehicle Awareness & Preferences in Vermont

19310 STONE OAK PARKWAY OFFICE BUILDING San Antonio, Texas

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

Evaluation of an Electric Bike Pilot Project at Three Employment Campuses in Portland, Oregon

Electric Vehicles Today and Tomorrow November 6, 2017

Right dir - wrong track Number of cases

Churchill Farms Retail 4020 FM 1463, Fulshear, TX 77441

PEP BOYS. Investment Property Offering. $1,472, Skyland Blvd East, Tuscaloosa, AL Offering Highlights

Why Natural Gas Refuse Trucks? Mike Cecere, Business Development Manager Solid Waste, Northeast Region

Green California Summit & Exposition April 7,2008. Green Fleets: Kicking Tires & Crunching Numbers The 1992 Federal Energy Policy Act (EPAct)

Technical Manual for Gibson Test of Cognitive Skills- Revised

Customer Preferences & Solar PV Adoption

New Vehicle Feebates: Theory and Evidence

Request for Information (RFI) from Potential Bidders

The Dynamics of Plug-in Electric Vehicles in the Secondary Market

EFFECT OF PAVEMENT CONDITIONS ON FUEL CONSUMPTION, TIRE WEAR AND REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE COSTS

THE LIGHT-DUTY-VEHICLE FLEET S EVOLUTION:

Clean Cities Presentation

San Diego Metropolitan Transit System. William R. Spraul Chief Operating Officer, Transit Services

MIG DATA FILE. Table 1: Respondent Information by Community Community Number

Plug-in Electric Vehicle Incentives

Downtown Vacant Property 000 Ward Street, Jacksonville, NC 28546

Air & Waste Management Association September 26, Lori Clark, Program Manager, NCTCOG

Consumer Choice Modeling

Form DOT F (8-72) SWUTC/06/

Boalsburg Tech Park Build-to-Suit. 176 Technology Drive, Boalsburg, PA 16827

2610 S Miracle Mile, Bullhead City

Office Bldg. Class "A" Suites- N. Fro

Distributional Effects of Air Pollution from Electric Vehicle Adoption

ENERGY & AIR QUALITY ISSUES WORKSHOP

Automotive Repair Technician

Demographics for 1745 Main St., West Warwick, RI 02893

4.2 Acres Commercial Land Stone Oak Parkway San Antonio, Texas

Natural Gas Alt-Fuel Primer: Going Green and Improving Your Bottom Line

On The Border Cycle 2212 Spencer Hwy, Pasadena, TX 77504

NYC s GREEN Fuel Supplier... March 2010

U.S. Navy Fleet AFV Program Report for Fiscal Year 2006 February 12, 2007

Bank Owned Subdivision 3166 Burgaw Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540

Who has trouble reporting prior day events?

Tribal Transit Presentation. April 2011

Driving the Market for Plug-in Vehicles - Understanding Financial Purchase Incentives

Case Study: Arlington County s Implementation and Operational Experience with B20 Biodiesel VIRGINIA

Truck and Bus Regulation National Pavement Expo West

Sigmon Commons 5225 Sigmon Rd, Wilmington, NC 28403

ALAMEDA GREEN YOUR DREAM HOME SERIES

1800 W. YOSEMITE AVE. Presented by ARS Commercial W Yosemite Ave, Manteca, CA 95337

The U.S. Auto Industry, Washington and New Priorities:

Energy 101 Energy Technology and Policy

What car should I drive? Ken Chu, Elliot Deal, Betty Hui, Jennifer Tse, Natalie Yin

Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York

Sacramento Regional Transit District

51st & Thunderbird Shopping Center

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

California Transportation Electrification and the ZEV Mandate. Analisa Bevan Assistant Division Chief, ECARS November 2016

11012 FIRESTONE BLVD., NORWALK, CA 90650

Executive Summary. Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 through EPA420-S and Air Quality July 2006

Fleet EV suitability assessment

FLEET SERVICES OVERVIEW and ACCOMPLISHMENTS Public Works Commission August 10, 2017

Highway 24 Retail 2153 Lejeune Blvd, Jacksonville, NC 28546

Transcription:

ESTIMATION RESULTS: THE DESIGN OF A COMPREHENSIVE MICROSIMULATOR OF HOUSEHOLD VEHICLE FLEET COMPOSITION, UTILIZATION, AND EVOLUTION Rajesh Paleti The University of Texas at Austin Dept of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering 1 University Station C1761, Austin TX 78712-0278 Phone: 512-471-4535, Fax: 512-475-8744, Email: rajeshp@mail.utexas.edu Naveen Eluru The University of Texas at Austin Dept of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering 1 University Station C1761, Austin TX 78712-0278 Phone: 512-471-4535, Fax: 512-475-8744, Email: naveeneluru@mail.utexas.edu Chandra R. Bhat* (corresponding author) The University of Texas at Austin Dept of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering 1 University Station C1761, Austin TX 78712-0278 Phone: 512-471-4535, Fax: 512-475-8744, Email: bhat@mail.utexas.edu Ram M. Pendyala Arizona State University School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment Room ECG252, Tempe, AZ 85287-5306 Phone: (480) 727-9164, Fax: (480) 965-0557, Email: ram.pendyala@asu.edu Thomas J. Adler Resource Systems Group, Inc. 55 Railroad Row, White River Junction, VT 05001 Phone: 802-295-4999, Email: tadler@rsginc.com Konstadinos G. Goulias University of California Department of Geography Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 Phone: 805-308-2837, Fax: 805-893-2578, Email: Kostas@geog.ucsb.edu

Table 1 Estimates of the Vehicle Type Choice Component of Vehicle Selection Module Variable Constant Purchase Price*10,000 ($) Fuel cost per gallon ($) Miles per Gallon /100 Fuel cost per year /10,000 ($) Maintenance cost per year/1000 ($) Acceleration Time (0 to 60 mph) Car pooling No vehicle Compact Car (CC) -0.9117-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-5.85) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) Car -1.3308-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-9.04) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) Small cross utility vehicle (SCU) -2.9238-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (14.59) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) SUV -2.5837-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-15.43) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) Van -3.6083-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-10.70) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) Pickup -2.0264-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-11.91) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) Gasoline -0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) Flex Fuel -6.1869-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-24.57) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) Plug-in Hybrid -6.4528-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-16.31) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) CNG -10.1116-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-12.66) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) Diesel -4.3623-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-19.11) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) Hybrid Electric -4.2090-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-23.99) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) Fully Electric -9.2395-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-12.53) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) New Car -0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) 1 or 2 years -1.9025-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-7.45) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) 3 to 7 years -1.3159-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-13.45) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) 8 to 12 years -3.2003-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-17.58) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) > 12 years -3.8367-0.6706-0.1292 4.8922-4.7037-0.4797-0.0487 1.3049 1.4489 (-14.69) (-18.65) (-1.75) (13.74) (-10.23) (-2.34) (-3.60) (11.41) (12.37) Free parking 1

Variable Table 1 Estimates of the Vehicle Type Choice Component of Vehicle Selection Module (Continued) $1,000 Tax credits 50% Reduced toll $1,000 Vehicle price reduction Fuel availability (1 in 50 stations) Vehicle range (150 to 200 miles) Vehicle range (>200 miles) Number of male adults Number of female adults 0 to 4 years of children 5 to 11 years 12 to 15 years of senior adults No vehicle Compact Car 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.3177 4.6733 4.8541-0.2289 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-1.45) (5.58) (5.97) (-1.86) Car 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.3177 4.6733 4.8541 0.5032 0.4328 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-1.45) (5.58) (5.97) (7.93) (5.07) SCU 2 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.3177 4.6733 4.8541-0.8603 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-1.45) (5.58) (5.97) (-3.92) SUV 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.3177 4.6733 4.8541 0.3504 0.3504 0.5474 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-1.45) (5.58) (5.97) (7.61) (7.61) (5.20) Van 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.3177 4.6733 4.8541 0.5067 1.0985 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-1.45) (5.58) (5.97) (3.80) (6.88) Pickup 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.3177 4.6733 4.8541 0.6937 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-1.45) (5.58) (5.97) (8.31) Gasoline 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) Flex Fuel 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.3471 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-1.87) Plug-in Hybrid 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.5550 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-8.10) CNG 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.3177 4.6733 4.8541 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-1.45) (5.58) (5.97) Diesel 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.4723-0.4503 0.3547 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-4.30) (-2.55) (2.35) Hybrid Electric 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.5550 0.3306 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-8.10) (3.40) Fully Electric 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.3177 4.6733 4.8541 0.4141 0.7095 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-1.45) (5.58) (5.97) (2.86) (3.69) New Car 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.3177 4.6733 4.8541 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-1.45) (5.58) (5.97) 1 or 2 years 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.3177 4.6733 4.8541 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-1.45) (5.58) (5.97) 3 to 7 years 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.3177 4.6733 4.8541 0.4027-0.5171 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-1.45) (5.58) (5.97) (4.76) (-6.25) 8 to 12 yrs 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.3177 4.6733 4.8541-0.5502 0.4027-0.5171 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-1.45) (5.58) (5.97) (-3.13) (4.76) (-6.25) > 12 years 1.5317 1.1163 1.2648-0.3177 4.6733 4.8541 0.5137-0.5502 0.4027-0.5171 (12.90) (9.93) (10.62) (-1.45) (5.58) (5.97) (3.19) (-3.13) (4.76) (-6.25) 2

Variable # full time workers Table 1 Estimates of the Vehicle Type Choice Component of Vehicle Selection Module (Continued) # part time workers # full time workers from home # part time workers from home Household Income < $20K ($20K,$40K) ($40K,$60K) ($60K,$80K) ($80K,$100K) ($100K,$120K) > $120K College Education Attainment Post graduate No vehicle CC 1 0.2774 0.5170 0.5170 0.5170 0.8070 0.4023 0.6152 (1.70) (4.72) (4.72) (4.72) (6.64) (2.99) (4.39) Car -0.1082 0.3939 0.5461 1.1675 1.1675 1.1675 1.6206 (-2.27) (6.50) (4.02) (8.51) (8.51) (8.51) (11.09) SCU 2 0..9495 0..9495 0..9495 1.7926 0.4122 (5.27) (5.27) (5.27) 9.76 (3.03) SUV 0.3494 0.3299 0.3742 1.3508 1.3508 1.4086 1.8632 0.1229 (1.68) (1.83) (2.25) (8.88) (8.88) 8.43 (11.52) (1.52) Van 0.3494 0.6413 0.5556 0.5556 0.5556 0.5556 0.6972 1.0739 (1.68) (2.43) (3.42) (3.42) 3.41 (3.52) (2.44) (3.57) Pickup 0.2457 0.5289 0.8474 0.8474 0.8081 0.8081-0.6168 (2.94) (3.27) (5.51) (5.51) 5.12 (4.95) (-5.27) Gasoline Flex Fuel -0.9007 0.5198 0.5198 0.3209 (-1.65) (2.42) (2.42) (1.99) Plug-in -0.7582-0.4065 0.7613 1.4306 (-2.96) (-1.55) (2.69) (4.26) CNG -1.5787 1.0726 (-1.69) (2.86) Diesel 0.1012-0.9168-0.9168-0.2847 (1.40) (-5.07) (-5.07) (-2.55) Hybrid 0.5098 0.3004 0.3004 0.3004 0.3004 0.6496 (2.40) (2.87) (2.87) (2.87) (2.87) (6.84) Fully 1.5267 1.6261 (2.58) (2.70) New Car 0.4229 0.7828 0.7828 0.7828 0.2544 (4.00) (12.94) 13.75 (12.94) (3.70) 1 or 2 years 0.1447 0.2032 0.6052 0.6052 0.6052 1.0111 1.0111 1.0111-0.4107 (2.90) (3.15) (2.37) (2.37) (2.37) (3.85) (3.85) (3.85) (-5.39) 3 to 7 years 0.2817 0.3271 0.6052 0.6052 0.6052-0.4107 (6.53) (5.19) (2.37) (2.37) (2.37) (-5.39) 8 to 12 yrs 0.2576 0.3722 0.9582 0.6525-0.7201-0.4107 (4.19) (4.19) (6.70) (4.33) (-3.81) (-5.39) >12 years 0.2576 0.3722 0.9582 0.6525-0.7201-0.4107 (4.19) (4.19) (6.70) (4.33) (-3.81) (-5.39) 3

Variable Caucasian Table 1 Estimates of the Vehicle Type Choice Component of Vehicle Selection Module (Continued) Suburban Rural of CC 1 of Car Existing Fleet Characteristics of SCU 2 of SUV of Van of pickup Compact Car Replaced vehicle Characteristics SCU SUV Van Pickup Gasoline No vehicle CC 0.1250-1.9361-2.0499-0.3459-2.0936-0.5155-0.8660-1.6086-0.9692-1.3853-2.1658 1.6696 (1.81) (-13.00) (-11.68) (-2.22) (-10.44) (2.82) (-4.41) (-8.82) (-3.41) (-6.29) (-8.54) (13.14) Car 0.1883-2.1967-2.0936-0.2741-0.7987 1.9325 0.9366 1.1706-0.7988 (2.69) (-12.60) (-10.44) (-1.69) (-4.36) (12.66) (4.45) (4.29) (-2.90) SCU -0.8924-1.1602-1.2080-0.9808 2.5704 0.4980 (-4.25) (-5.40) (-4.95) (-3.67) (9.52) (3.03) SUV 0.2538-1.6156-1.6086-1.8499-0.2741-0.7089 2.6346 1.6286 (3.50) (-10.13) (-9.24) (-9.17) (-1.69) (-3.72) (12.80) (6.55) Van -1.3541-1.2939-1.8499-1.2033-0.5128 4.7031 (-6.77) (-5.77) (-9.17) (-3.68) (-2.15) (13.84) Pickup 0.5639 0.8941-1.6428-1.6495-1.8499-1.7037-0.4344 1.3970 4.3531-0.8213 (5.92) (3.95) (-912) (-8.57) (-9.17) (-8.04) (-1.66) (5.09) (16.18) (-4.51) Gasoline -0.5262-1.1169-0.6849-1.1219 (-4.39) (-10.50) (-3.20) (-5.32) Flex Fuel -0.2261 1.9512 1.3386 2.0363 0.7940-0.8788 0.8057 (-1.50) (10.51) (7.34) (15.40) (3.47) (-2.70) (3.85) Plug-in -0.1356-0.3138 1.8957 1.2243 2.0363 0.6725 0.5600 0.8335-0.9356 0.8060 (-1.62) (-2.84) (12.28) (6.89) (15.40) (3.77) (2.76) (2.93) (-2.90) (3.86) CNG -0.1356 0.9095 0.9336 1.2938 (-1.62) (3.46) (3.63) (4.53) Diesel 1.4152 1.8767 1.4222 1.5166 0.5480 0.7665 1.0472 0.7583-0.6599 (5.94) (12.04) (8.42) (8.16) (3.32) (3.61) (4.38) (2.55) (-3.86) Hybrid -0.4147 0.6952 1.1161 0.8375-0.5749 1.5480-0.5585 0.4450-1.6493 1.5226 (-4.82) (2.25) (9.33) (7.32) (-2.63) (11.99) (-2.89) (2.99) (-6.00) (12.38) Fully -0.1356-0.6446 0.5559 0.6060 1.0224-0.5509 (-1.62) (-4.04) (2.77) (3.23) (5.10) (-2.36) New Car -1.0822-1.1471-0.9657-1.1730-1.2532-0.9933 1.7962 0.4567 3.3193 (-7.64) (-7.12) (-5.18) (-5.99) (-7.01) (-5.48) (2.86) (2.94) (8.11) 1 or 2 years -0.6007-0.6517-0.9657-0.7664-0.7943-0.5935 1.7962 3.3193 (-4.39) (-4.07) (-5.18) (-3.88) (-4.14) (-3.27) (2.86) (8.11) 3 to 7 years -0.7897-0.6517-0.7792-0.7664-0.7943-0.5935 1.7962 3.3193 (-5.84) (-4.07) (-3.66) (-3.88) (-4.14) (-3.27) (2.86) (8.11) 8 to 12 yrs 0.4913 2.0143 (4.55) (4.65) More than 0.4913 (4.55) 1 Compact Car 2 Small Cross-utility vehicle 4

Table 2 Estimates of the Vehicle Usage Component of Vehicle Selection Module Variable Parameter t-stat Constant 8.3763 131.94 of children Under 4 years 0.0401 1.69 of senior adults -0.1030-5.08 HH Income Above $80K 0.0434 2.59 Location of HH Sub-urban 0.1203 7.85 Number of workers 0.0829 7.80 Number of vehicles Two -0.0633-2.69 Three -0.1757-6.10 Four -0.2810-7.31 Mean distance to work /10 (miles) 0.1008 14.69 Vehicle Characteristics Car 0.0495 2.18 Small cross utility vehicle -0.1369-3.23 SUV or Van 0.0792 3.19 8 to 12 years old -0.415-8.17 More than 12 years old -0.7032-12.71 Standard error of the estimate 0.7356 44.25 The scale parameter ( λ ) was estimated to be 0.5556 with a t-statistic of 24.15 (against a value of 1) and copula dependency parameter ( θ ) is estimated to be equal to -3.367 with a t-statistic of -9.39. 5

Table 3 Replacement Decision of Evolution Module: Binary Logit model Variable Parameter t statistic Constant -2.1093-10.13 Race of household (other race is base) Caucasian 0.1231 1.92 Hispanic 0.9166 2.11 Large Household ( size >=5) 0.1695 1.50 Large household*replaced vehicle is SUV -0.4539-2.14 Household Income (Base is below $60,000) Between $60,000 and $100,000 0.1469 1.84 Above $120,000 0.2042 2.30 of children 0 to 4 years -0.3872-3.16 5 to 11 years -0.1598-1.49 12 to 15 years 0.4287 3.00 Characteristics of vehicle getting replaced Sports car or cross utility vehicle -0.3579-2.06 SUV -0.1415-1.68 Van -0.1569-1.39 Pickup -0.1420-1.57 1-3 years old 0.1849 2.21 3-7 years old 0.2312 2.87 8-12 years old 0.5624 4.00 More than 12 years old 0.2810 1.74 Gasoline Fueled 0.4519 2.34 Log-likelihood = -2857.53 6

Table 4 Addition Decision of Evolution Module: Binary Logit model Variable Parameter t statistic Constant -4.7298-13.18 Race of the household (other race is base) Caucasian -0.3970-1.73 Hispanic -6.8937-6.82 Number of adults 0.8023 5.13 Large Household ( size >=5) 0.7123 2.18 Household Income (Base is above $20,000) Between $20,000 1.4400 2.99 of children 12 to 15 years 1.2956 4.48 of senior adults -1.8692-3.40 Region (Base is urban and sub-urban) Rural 0.9976 2.15 Household Vehicle Fleet Characteristics Number of compact cars -0.7604-3.13 Number of cars -0.4485-1.95 Number of SUVs -0.2952-1.58 Number of Pickup trucks -0.5677-2.29 Log-likelihood = -430.261 7