Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination

Similar documents
Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards VHG Labs Inc. Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100 and D12-XXX Series Standards

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards SCP Science (Conostan) Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100, and D12-XXX Series Standards

Evaluation of Digital Refractometers for Field Determination of FSII Concentration in JP-5 Fuel

Navy Coalescence Test on Petroleum F-76 Fuel with Infineum R655 Lubricity Improver at 300 ppm

Navy Coalescence Test on Camelina HRJ5 Fuel

Robot Drive Motor Characterization Test Plan

TARDEC Technology Integration

Feeding the Fleet. GreenGov Washington D.C. October 31, 2011

Impact of 200 ppm HiTEC 4898C Lubricity Improver Additive (LIA) on F-76 Fuel Coalescence

AFRL-RX-TY-TM

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Track & Suspension Overview Mr. Jason Alef & Mr. Geoff Bossio 11 Aug 2011

TARDEC --- TECHNICAL REPORT ---

Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel January 25, 2006 Hilton San Diego Resort 1775 East Mission Bay Drive San Diego, CA 92109

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Energy Storage Overview Mr. David Skalny & Dr. Laurence Toomey 10 August 2011

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 3

TARDEC Robotics. Dr. Greg Hudas UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Non-primary Power Systems Overview Kevin Centeck and Darin Kowalski 10 Aug 2011

Helicopter Dynamic Components Project. Presented at: HCAT Meeting January 2006

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4

U.S. Army/CERDEC's Portable Fuel Cell Evaluation and Field Testing 2011 Fuel Cell Seminar & Expo Orlando, FL 31 Oct 2011

LESSONS LEARNED WHILE MEASURING FUEL SYSTEM DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MARK HEATON AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 10 MAY 2011

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A. Approved for Public Release TACOM Case # 21906, 26 May Vehicle Electronics and Architecture

Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Command (TARDEC) Overview

GM-TARDEC Autonomous Safety Collaboration Meeting

UNCLASSIFIED: DIST A. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. ARMY GREATEST INVENTIONS CY 2009 PROGRAM MRAP Overhead Wire Mitigation (OWM) Kit

EXPLORATORY DISCUSSIONS - PRE DECISIONAL

Alternative Fuels: FT SPK and HRJ for Military Use

Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System. Auto-ACAS. Mark A. Skoog Dryden Flight Research Center - NASA. AutoACAS. Dryden Flight Research Center

An Advanced Fuel Filter

Servicing Hawker Vehicle Batteries with Standard Battery Charging and Test Equipment

Does V50 Depend on Armor Mass?

US ARMY POWER OVERVIEW

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE

Evaluation of Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL) Candidates for Fuel Consumption Benefits in Military Equipment

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

Presented by Mr. Greg Kilchenstein OSD, Maintenance. 29August 2012

Monolithically Integrated Micro Flapping Vehicles

US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations. Major Robert Kent, USAF, MC, SFS

Open & Evolutive UAV Architecture

Energy Storage Requirements & Challenges For Ground Vehicles

High efficiency variable speed versatile power air conditioning system for military vehicles

TARDEC OVERVIEW. Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center. APTAC Spring Conference Detroit 27 March, 2007

HIGH REPETITION RATE CHARGING A MARX TYPE GENERATOR *

FTTS Utility Vehicle UV2 Concept Review FTTS UV2 Support Variant

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

DSCC Annual Tire Conference CATL UPDATE. March 24, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Portable Fluid Analyzer

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

INTELLIGENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN A TWO POWER-BUS VEHICLE SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

INLINE MONITORING OF FREE WATER AND PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION OF JET A FUEL

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

Dual Use Ground Vehicle Condition-Based Maintenance Project B

F100 ENGINE NACELLE FIRE FIGHTING TEST MOCKUP DRAWINGS

Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft

DESULFURIZATION OF LOGISTIC FUELS FOR FUEL CELL APUs

TARDEC Hybrid Electric Program Last Decade

2011 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 9-11 DEARBORN, MICHIGAN

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Power Requirements

Predator B: The Multi-Role UAV

Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells

TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS ON A FUSELAGE-LIKE TEST SETUP AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF APERTURES

Hydro-Piezoelectricity: A Renewable Energy Source For Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

Quarterly Progress Report

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

Robust Fault Diagnosis in Electric Drives Using Machine Learning

Up-Coming Diesel Fuel and Exhaust Emissions Regulations For Mobile Sources. Parminder Khabra RDECOM-TARDEC TACOM LCMC March 22, 2006 JSEM

Application of Airbag Technology for Vehicle Protection

Power Technology Branch Army Power Division US Army RDECOM CERDEC C2D Fort Belvoir, Virginia

NoFoam Unit Installation, Evaluation and Operations Manual

Multilevel Vehicle Design: Fuel Economy, Mobility and Safety Considerations, Part B

Membrane Wing Aerodynamics for µav Applications

Additives to Increase Fuel Heat Sink Capacity

Fuel System Icing Inhibitor Concentration Reduction Study

Center for Ground Vehicle Development and Integration

Endurance Testing of Redesigned Tab Spring for MI-RAMS System

Predator Program Office

Blast Pendulum Testing of Milliken Tegris Panels

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Fuel Efficient ground vehicle Demonstrator (FED) Vision

NDCEE National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

DEVELOPMENT OF COMPACT VARIABLE- VOLTAGE, BI-DIRECTIONAL 100KW DC-DC CONVERTER

Program Overview. Chris Mocnik Robotic Vehicle Control Architecture for FCS ATO Manager U.S. Army RDECOM TARDEC

Hybrid Components: Motors and Power Electronics

GVSET Power & Energy Preview Mr. Chuck Coutteau Associate Director (Acting) Ground Vehicle Power & Mobility 19 August 2009

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

IMPACT OF FRICTION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON FUEL ECONOMY FOR GROUND VEHICLES G. R. Fenske, R. A. Erck, O. O. Ajayi, A. Masoner, and A. S.

EVALUATION OF TWO SKID-MOUNTED CORE DRILLS FOR AIRFIELD PAVEMENT EVALUATION

Report No. D November 24, Live Fire Testing of Light Tactical Wheeled Vehicles was Effective for the Portions Completed

ITC-Germany Visit. Chuck Coutteau, Associate Director Ground Vehicle Power and Mobility Overview 10 November 2011

Research Development and Engineering Command TARDEC/NAC

Developing a Methodology for the Evaluation of Hybrid Vehicle Thermal Management Systems

2012 E2S2 CARB s New Mobile Equipment Regulations

A GENERAL PURPOSE VEHICLE POWERTRAIN MODELING AND SIMULATION SOFTWARE - VPSET

Transcription:

Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination NF&LCFT REPORT 441/14-007 Prepared By: MICHAEL PERTICH, PHD Chemist AIR-4.4.6.1 NAVAIR Public Release 2014-24 Distribution Statement A - Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited

Page ii Report prepared and released by: Naval Air Systems Command Naval Fuels & Lubricants CFT 22229 Elmer Road Patuxent River MD 20670-1534 Reviewed and Approved by: JOHN KRIZOVENSKY Branch Supervisor AIR-4.4.6.1 GEOFFREY ELDRIDGE Chemistry Team Lead AIR-4.4.6.1 PEDRO FARIAS NOAP Program Manager AIR-4.4.6.1 Released by: DOUGLAS F. MEARNS Fuels & Lubricants Systems Engineer AIR-4.4.1

Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... iv 1.0 BACKGROUND... 1 2.0 OBJECTIVE... 1 3.0 APPROACH... 1 4.0 DISCUSSION... 1 5.0 CONCLUSIONS... 3 LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page Table 1. Viscosity at 40 C determined using the SpectroVisc Q3000.... 2 Table 2. Comparison of Measured Viscosities at 40 C... 3

Page iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Navy routinely measures the viscosity of lubricating oils and hydraulic fluids. Viscosity measurements typically are conducted in a land based laboratory however the use of a handheld viscometer like the SpectroVisc Q3000 would allow for measurements onboard a Navy vessel. This would reduce the amount of time needed to obtain viscosity measurements and make the process more efficient. Spectro Inc. furnished NAVAIR (AIR-4.4.6.1) with a SpectroVisc Q3000 handheld viscometer for the purpose of evaluating the accuracy and repeatability of the instrument using Cannon reference standards. Testing was accomplished at the NAVAIR Pensacola FL test facility in accordance with the operating procedures provided by Spectro Inc. The accuracy and repeatability of the SpectroVisc Q3000 was evaluated using five Cannon reference standards [N10 (10 cst), N44 (44 cst), N100 (100 cst), N250 (250 cst), and N350 (310 cst)]. These five reference standards span the reported measuring range of the SpectroVisc Q3000. The viscosity at 40 C of the five standards was determined by measuring each standard 20 times. According to Spectro Inc., the accuracy and repeatability should be 3%. In addition, the measured viscosities of the Cannon reference standards were compared to the results obtained using an Anton Paar viscometer. The measured viscosities for both instruments should be within 3% of each other. NAVAIR confirmed the accuracy and repeatability statements made by Spectro Inc. concerning the capabilities of the SpectroVisc Q3000. Both the accuracy and repeatability of the SpectroVisc Q3000 were determined to be less than 3%.

Page 1 Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination 1.0 BACKGROUND The Navy routinely measures the viscosity of lubricating oils and hydraulic fluids. Viscosity measurements that are lower than expected indicate a fuel contamination while measurements that are higher than expected indicate water contamination. Viscosity measurements typically are conducted in a land based laboratory however the use of a handheld viscometer like the SpectroVisc Q3000 would allow for measurements onboard a Navy vessel. This would reduce the amount of time needed to obtain viscosity measurements and make the process more efficient. Spectro Inc. furnished NAVAIR (AIR-4.4.6.1) with a SpectroVisc Q3000 handheld viscometer for the purpose of evaluating the accuracy and repeatability of the instrument using Cannon reference standards. Testing was accomplished at the NAVAIR Pensacola FL test facility in accordance with the operating procedures provided by Spectro Inc. 2.0 OBJECTIVE The objective of this testing is to evaluate the SpectroVisc Q3000 instrument for the determination of viscosity at 40 C in lubricating oils and hydraulic fluids. 3.0 APPROACH The accuracy and repeatability of the SpectroVisc Q3000 was evaluated using five Cannon reference standards [N10 (10 cst), N44 (44 cst), N100 (100 cst), N250 (250 cst), and N350 (310 cst)]. These five reference standards span the reported measuring range of the SpectroVisc Q3000. The viscosity at 40 C of the five standards was determined by measuring each standard 20 times. According to Spectro Inc., the accuracy and repeatability should be 3%. The measured viscosities of the Cannon reference standards were compared to the results obtained using an Anton Paar viscometer. The measured viscosities for both instruments should be within 3% of each other. 4.0 DISCUSSION The viscosity at 40 C was measured 20 times for five Cannon reference standards [N10 (10 cst), N44 (44 cst), N100 (100 cst), N250 (250 cst), and N350 (310 cst)] using the SpectroVisc Q3000. Table 1 presents the measured viscosities.

Page 2 Table 1: Viscosity at 40 C determined using the SpectroVisc Q3000 Cannon N10 10 cst Cannon N44 44 cst Cannon N100 100 cst Cannon N250 250 cst Cannon N350 310 cst 1 10.2 44.3 98.5 248 304 2 10.1 42.5 99.4 245 304 3 9.9 42.2 98.4 252 301 4 10.0 44.0 95.3 243 303 5 10.0 42.7 99.1 238 300 6 10.0 43.8 96.6 239 306 7 10.1 43.1 97.4 247 307 8 10.0 43.4 98.1 246 307 9 10.1 44.4 97.0 238 311 10 10.0 43.5 100.0 236 314 11 9.9 44.5 101.0 250 314 12 10.0 42.5 97.7 242 306 13 10.0 43.4 100.0 245 302 14 9.9 43.1 97.7 247 305 15 9.9 43.7 99.8 240 303 16 10.0 43.2 98.5 248 300 17 10.1 44.1 98.2 246 310 18 9.9 44.2 97.5 242 306 19 10.0 43.4 99.2 243 304 20 10.0 44.3 98.8 247 305 Average 10.0 43.5 98.4 244 306 Stdev 0.1 0.7 1.3 4 4 %RSD 0.83 1.59 1.36 1.77 1.33 The accuracy and repeatability of the SpectroVisc Q3000 was determined to be 3% for all five of the Cannon reference standards. The viscosity at 40 C was measured 20 times for the same five Cannon reference standards using an Anton Paar viscometer. Table 2 presents the measured viscosities for all five standards on both viscometers.

Page 3 Table 2: Comparison of Measured Viscosities at 40 C Cannon N10 Cannon N44 Cannon N100 Cannon N250 Cannon N350 Anton Paar Q3000 Anton Paar Q3000 Anton Paar Q3000 Anton Paar Q3000 Anton Paar Q3000 1 10.225 10.2 44.583 44.3 97.582 98.5 250.82 248 312.33 304 2 10.127 10.1 44.529 42.5 97.884 99.4 250.38 245 312.48 304 3 10.120 9.9 44.516 42.2 97.947 98.4 250.98 252 312.58 301 4 10.117 10.0 44.515 44.0 98.033 95.3 250.52 243 312.59 303 5 10.117 10.0 44.514 42.7 98.036 99.1 251.19 238 312.59 300 6 10.118 10.0 44.511 43.8 98.069 96.6 250.09 239 312.70 306 7 10.118 10.1 44.510 43.1 98.086 97.4 250.74 247 312.61 307 8 10.118 10.0 44.510 43.4 98.086 98.1 250.41 246 312.14 307 9 10.121 10.1 44.507 44.4 98.128 97.0 250.94 238 312.45 311 10 10.119 10.0 44.509 43.5 97.796 100.0 250.86 236 312.50 314 11 10.119 9.9 44.509 44.5 98.149 101.0 250.97 250 312.62 314 12 10.122 10.0 44.508 42.5 98.184 97.7 250.97 242 312.55 306 13 10.121 10.0 44.507 43.4 98.149 100.0 251.23 245 312.61 302 14 10.115 9.9 44.513 43.1 98.143 97.7 251.18 247 312.57 305 15 10.115 9.9 44.505 43.7 98.160 99.8 252.60 240 312.69 303 16 10.116 10.0 44.505 43.2 98.095 98.5 252.60 248 312.69 300 17 10.116 10.1 44.513 44.1 98.084 98.2 252.58 246 312.92 310 18 10.116 9.9 44.509 44.2 98.108 97.5 252.93 242 312.66 306 19 10.115 10.0 44.511 43.4 98.122 99.2 251.11 243 312.74 304 20 10.115 10.0 44.509 44.3 98.126 98.8 251.06 247 312.63 305 Average 10.124 10.0 44.515 43.5 98.048 98.4 251.208 244 312.583 306 Stdev 0.024 0.1 0.017 0.7 0.146 1.3 0.812 4 0.159 4 %RSD 0.24 0.83 0.04 1.59 0.15 1.36 0.32 1.77 0.05 1.33 The measured viscosities for both instruments were determined to be within 3% of each other. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS NAVAIR substantiated the accuracy and repeatability statements made by Spectro Inc. concerning the capabilities of the SpectroVisc Q3000. Both the accuracy and repeatability of the SpectroVisc Q3000 were determined to be less than 3%.

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 11-14-2013 Technical 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination 6. AUTHOR(S) Peretich, Michael; Author Eldridge, Geoffrey.; Editor Krizovensky, John ; Editor Farias, Pedro ; Editor Mearns, Douglas ; Editor 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 08-20-2011 to 11-14-2013 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER Naval Fuels & Lubricants NF&LCFT Report 441/14-007 Cross Functional Team 22229 Elmer Road Patuxent River, MD 20670 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) Naval Air Systems Command NPRE Program 22347 Cedar Point Road 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT Patuxent River MD 20670 NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT A Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT The Navy routinely measures the viscosity of lubricating oils and hydraulic fluids. Viscosity measurements typically are conducted in a land based laboratory however the use of a handheld viscometer like the SpectroVisc Q3000 would allow for measurements onboard a Navy vessel. This would reduce the amount of time needed to obtain viscosity measurements and make the process more efficient. Spectro Inc. furnished NAVAIR (AIR-4.4.6.1) with a SpectroVisc Q3000 handheld viscometer for the purpose of evaluating the accuracy and repeatability of the instrument using Cannon reference standards. Testing was accomplished at the NAVAIR Pensacola FL test facility in accordance with the operating procedures provided by Spectro Inc. The accuracy and repeatability of the SpectroVisc Q3000 was evaluated using five Cannon reference standards [N10 (10 cst), N44 (44 cst), N100 (100 cst), N250 (250 cst), and N350 (310 cst)]. These five reference standards span the reported measuring range of the SpectroVisc Q3000. The viscosity at 40 C of the five standards was determined by measuring each standard 20 times. According to Spectro Inc., the accuracy and repeatability should be 3%. In addition, the measured viscosities of the Cannon reference standards were compared to the results obtained using an Anton Paar viscometer. The measured viscosities for both instruments should be within 3% of each other. NAVAIR confirmed the accuracy and repeatability statements made by Spectro Inc. concerning the capabilities of the SpectroVisc Q3000. Both the accuracy and repeatability of the SpectroVisc Q3000 were determined to be less than 3%. 15. SUBJECT TERMS Joint Oil Analysis Program, SpectroVisc Q3000 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT UNCLASSIFIED b. ABSTRACT UNCLASSIFIED c. THIS PAGE UNCLASSIFIED Unclassified Unlimited 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Douglas F. Mearns 8 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (include area code) 301-757-3421 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18