The New Development of CTCS in the Intercity Railway SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 CTCS OVERVIEW. 2.1 CTCS Levels

Similar documents
Research on Signal System Interoperability of Urban Rail Transit. Page 1

Annex A. to Technical Specification "Operations and traffic management" adopted by

Review of the state-of-the-art of Train Control Systems Technology in the world and comparative study on the most important 3-4 of them

Application and Development of CTCS

Der ERTMS-Markt außerhalb Europas

siemens.com/mobility Trainguard Full interoperability for rail traffic

SUPERVISION FUNCTIONS Page 1 (175)

AŽD Praha. ATO system type AVV. in everyday operation at Czech railway network. Vladimír Kampík. European Affairs Director, AŽD Praha

Satellite navigation traffic control system for low traffic lines Actual status and future deployment in Romania

Platform Steering Group #11 The Italian feedback from the field (ERTMS lines in commercial operation)

The design and implementation of a simulation platform for the running of high-speed trains based on High Level Architecture

SUPERVISION FUNCTIONS Page 1 (184)

Development of a Train Control System by Using the On-board Interlocking

Preliminary market consultation session

Is it worth the candle?

RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION DRIVERLESS TRAINS

ETCS Technical Snapshot From Baseline 2 to Baseline 3 creating a stable framework for ERTMS investments

REDUCING THE OCCURRENCES AND IMPACT OF FREIGHT TRAIN DERAILMENTS

Option 2 - Convert to Automatic Train Control (ATC) Signalling Technology

Technological systems for High Speed lines, ERTMS, security, power systems. Renato Casale Italferr (FS Group), Italy

State-of-the-art architectures State-of-the-art testing Jürgen Schölzel, Siemens AG, Mobility Division

Faculty of Engineering Technology

Leading the way to the future. Peter Elestedt

Need, Strategy and Implementation of ERTMS

IRSE NEWS. September Chinese Principles Getting ready for the convention. Level Crossings Japanese approach

English version of. Executive Order on vehicles' technical compatibility with the rail network (Bekendtgørelse nr af 30. november 2012) Preface

How GSM-R serves railways globally. Norman FRISCH Business Development Railway Solutions

Foundation Fieldbus System Design and Engineering of CSPC Nanhai Project

Australia s First Fully Automated Metro Opportunities & Solutions. Oliver Fried Technical Director, Sydney Metro

UNISIG * EEIG ERTMS USERS GROUP * UNIFE

Please find enclosed a letter from François Bellot, Minister for Mobility, regarding the above matter. [complimentary close]

TPWS in action. Decisive steps towards main line ATP on IR. Akhilesh Yadav, Director/ Signal/ RDSO

The Modeling and Simulation of DC Traction Power Supply Network for Urban Rail Transit Based on Simulink

System integration through operability

Shaping the Future of Railway Industry Student Engagement Event 20 th September 2016

Notified National Technical Rules (NNTRs)

System. Antenna JRU. Mobile Gateway EVC STM. Cold Movement Detection. Pulse Generator. Safety ETCS

METRO PERFORMANCE. The quest for system performance in Singapore re-signalling project. L Y Lam FIRSE

The integration of traction equipment into a vehicle computer network

Document Control Identification. Document History. Authorisation

ETCS in Switzerland Views and Learning from an early Investor

ERTMS/ETCS National Values

AUTOCITS. Regulation Study for Interoperability in the Adoption the Autonomous Driving in European Urban Nodes. LISBON Pilot

N-03 STEERING GEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS

Automation in urban public transportation

INTRODUCTION. Ansaldo STS. Ansaldo STS is a leading technology company operating in railway and underground transportation.

Hybrid ERTMS/ETCS Level 3

Interoperability TSIs applicable to Railway vehicles. Innotrans, September, 2010

Examining the load peaks in high-speed railway transport

MODURBAN MODURBAN. Dan Otteborn, Member of the MODURBAN Supervisory Board

ZT-USB Series User Manual

EXTENDING PRT CAPABILITIES

CER/EIM Position Paper Ballast Pick-up due to Aerodynamic Effects. October Version 1.0

Rapid Response. Lineside Signal Spacing. Railway Group Standard GK/RT0034 Issue Three Date September 1998

Council of the European Union Brussels, 18 July 2014 (OR. en)

A GENERIC FRAMEWORK FOR HAZARD ANALYSIS OF AUTOMATED VEHICLES IN TRANSIT SERVICE

UIC- ERTMS Conference 2004

Amtrak Signal and Train Control Systems PRACTICAL PTC. On Amtrak Owned Property. November 20, 2008

Planning of electric bus systems

Precision Station Stopping Progress Update

Driverless Train Operation

Safety Assessment & Approval System of Shanghai Maglev Demonstration Line and its Practice

Sustainable Railway Solutions

High Speed Passenger Rail Interoperability in North America

Integrated & Green Mobility

Theme of the Workshop. How the Railways contribute to improving quality of life?

A Joint initiative by ProRail and Network Rail for ETCS Level 3 Hybrid Demonstration

POSITION PAPER Version 3.0

High speed innovation in Adif. Antonio Berrios Villalba ADIF (Spain)

Mechanical Trainstop Systems

designing and producing a wide range of railway power converters and devices since 1986 FOCUS ON TRANSPORT ELECTRONICA

EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR RAILWAYS Annex 1 006REC1025 V 1.0

TOWARDS THE ELECTRIFICATION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT VIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP THE EXAMPLE OF LUXEMBOURG

Overview of Regulations for Autonomous Vehicles

Automatic Train Control. Stuart Landau CH2M HILL, System Engineer. Port Authority of NY and NJ, Program Manager. Jersey City, NJ

Eurailspeed Parallel Session E.1

Special edition paper

Increase of recovery in ERTMS lines with new ATO

NEW INITIATIVES IN SIGNALLING. Signalling System - backbone of Indian Railways

Train traffic control system on the Yamanashi Maglev test line

The Swiss approach based on B3

Using ERTMSFormalSpecs to model ERTMS braking curves

AUXILIARY FUNCTIONS Page 1 (43)

Kawasaki s Approach to US High Speed Rail. Masashi Ishizuka Kawasaki heavy Industries, LTD. Associate Officer Kobe, Japan

DER Commissioning Guidelines Community Scale PV Generation Interconnected Using Xcel Energy s Minnesota Section 10 Tariff Version 1.

Regenerative Braking System for Series Hybrid Electric City Bus

Enhancement and Utilization of Multipurpose Integrated Highly-Advanced Railway Applications (MIHARA) Test Center

ERTMS Level 2 Trackside

Developing an adaptable and flexible electric vehicle charging station

2012 EKE-Electronics Ltd. Page 1

Best Practices in Intercity Rail An Infrastructure Manager s Perspective. Nigel Ash Managing Director, Network Rail Consulting TRB January 2014

Automation in Mining. Underground mining automation project Mark Yseboodt Chile November siemens.com/mining. Restricted Siemens AG 2016

Application Guide for the European Register of Authorised Types of Railway Vehicles (ERATV)

Shinkansen Technology Exportation

on Motorways and on Main Roads The German GNSS Toll System Hanns-Karsten Kirchmann CEO, Toll Collect GmbH

Pantograph and catenary system with double pantographs for high-speed trains at 350 km/h or higher

Intelligent CAD system for the Hydraulic Manifold Blocks

Inventing a new type of platform gate

Train Group Control for Energy-Saving DC-Electric Railway Operation

FUTURE CHALLENGES TO AXLE COUNTING SYSTEMS by Martin Rosenberger

Transcription:

The New Development of CTCS in the Intercity Railway Anthony Weiqing Xue, Ricardo Rail (Formerly Lloyd s Register Rail) Sara Cui, Ricardo Rail (Formerly Lloyd s Register Rail) Fei Yan, Beijing Jiaotong University Haiwang Yi, China Academy of Railyway Science SUMMARY Intercity Railways are springing up in China and lot s of new lines have been planned. The article analyses and summarizes the major features of Intercity Railways. To meet the specific requirements in the Intercity Railway, a new train control system is required. This article reviews the different levels of Chinese Train Control System (CTCS) and their available control modes. Their major differences are presented. Several main solutions of Automatic Train Control (ATC) system, including CTCS-2 and ETCS-1, are analysed and compared in the article, for purpose of selection of a proper solution. An improved solution of CTCS-2 plus Automatic Train Operation (ATO) among these solutions is presented with its advantages for Intercity Railway application. The article introduces the system architecture/configuration and changes to the existing CTCS-2. The new equipment and functions in the CTCS-2 + ATO train control system (including on-board ATO, wayside Communication & Control Server (CCS), GSM-R devices and additional Eurobalise for ATO functions) are presented. How CCS was derived is is also analized, before finally introducting the testing methodology of system function and interoperability. 1 INTRODUCTION The Chinese Train Control System (CTCS), which was developed from the European Train Control System (ETCS), has been successfully applied in Chinese high-speed railway (Passenger Dedicated Line, PDL) for thousands of kilometres. However, the challenge of new technology exists all the time. That is to accommodate new railway operation requirements, reducing the construction, operation and maintenance cost with reasonable efficiency, and improving the capability and performance of lines. Dozens of Intercity Railway have been planned in most developed metropolitan areas in China, to connect burgeoning cities within their respective areas (which including Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta, Chang- Zhu-Tan Area, Central Henan urban agglomeration, Wuhan metropolitan area, etc.) The Intercity Railway has many different operational features when compared with the conventional high-speed railway, which require new functions and features for its signalling system. For example, Automatic Train Operation (ATO) has been proven in urban rail applications; however, it is not widely applied in other forms of railway. Another example is that the interoperability of wayside and on-board signalling systems across metro lines within one city or one area has not yet been implemented. The paper will introduce the CTCS briefly and its improvement for the Intercity Railway addressing the above challenges. 2 CTCS OVERVIEW 2.1 CTCS Levels There are 5 different levels in CTCS (from Level 0 to Level 4), in which the CTCS-2 and CTCS-3 are developed for high speed railway and CTCS-4 (similar to the ETCS-3) has not yet been applied currently [1]. The basic configurations of wayside/on-board signalling equipment in each level are outlined in Table 1: The New Development of CTCS in the Intercity Railway Page 1 of 9

CTCS Level Wayside Configuration On-board Configuration System Description Equivalent ETCS Level Level 0 Track Circuit Universal Cab Signalling Train Operation Supervision and Recording Device (LKJ) Driver Machine Interface () The current status of Chines Not available existing conventional railway lines, in which the maximum train speed of 120km/h. The cab signalling will repeat the wayside signal aspects. Fixed blocking. Level 1 Track Circuit Fixed Eurobalise Subjective Cab signalling Enhanced Safety Train Operation Supervision and Recording Device (LKJ) Balise Transmission Module (BTM) Recording Units Applicable for lines with maximum train speed of 160km/h. Cab Signalling provides the moving authority to driver when wayside signal aspect cannot be distinguished or is dark. Coded track circuit detects track occupancy and train integrity, and transfer train control information continuously. Not available Additional intermittent information (position, track data and temporary speed restriction) will be supplemented. This level is not widely applied currently and is still in developing. Level 2 Track Circuit (ZPW/UM Serials) Eurobalise and Lineside Electronic Unit (LEU) Train Control Centre (TCC) Temporary Speed Restriction Server (TSRS) Vital Computer (VC) Specific Transmission Module (STM, receiving track circuit telegram) BTM Speed Detection Unit (SDU) Recording Units Currently applicable for lines with maximum train speed of 200km/h - 250km/h. Intermittent-Continuous ATP based on information from track circuit plus Eurobalise. Wayside signal is not mandatory and driver operates according to on-board signal. LKJ can be equipped. ATP will transfer control to LKJ once it is degraded to CTCS-0. ETCS-1 Typical intermittent ATP. Track circuit or axle counter detect track occupancy and train integrity. Loop line transfer information as supplement. Eurobalise is applied for train positioning and transferring train control information. Wayside signal is necessary and driver operates according to wayside signal. Level 3 Track Circuit (ZPW/UM Serials) Eurobalise and LEU Radio Block Centre (RBC) VC GSM-R RTU (Radio Transmission Unit) BTM SDU Recording Units Currently applicable for lines with ETCS-2 maximum train speed of 300km/h - 350km/h; Train control system based on GSM-R wireless communication. CTCS-2 is its degraded mode. Track circuit detects track occupancy. RBC provides moving authority. Wayside signal is not mandatory and driver operates according to on-board signal. The New Development of CTCS in the Intercity Railway Page 2 of 9

Level 4 RBC VC GSM-R RTU SDU Recording Units GPS or Other positioning system Train Integrity Detection Device On-board equipment and RBC position trains and detect train integrity based on CTCS-3 together to minimise conventional signalling equipment required. Wayside signal is not necessary and driver operates according to on-board signal. This level is not applied currently. ETCS-3 Table 1: CTCS Levels The TCC is the key wayside equipment in CTCS-2, and the RBC is the key wayside equipment in CTCS-3. CTCS-2 can be the degraded control mode of CTCS-3. There are a few major differences between CTCS-2 and CTCS-3/ETCS: It is unidirectional transmission of messages from wayside to train via track circuit and Eurobalise in CTCS-2. It is bidirectional transmission between wayside and train via GSM-R with Eurobalise in CTCS- 3. The VC calculates the MA as per messages from track circuit and Eurobalise in CTCS-2. While in CTCS-3, RBC sends MA to train as per the information of routes, track occupancy and train status. The information from Eurobalie telegram is only for train localization. The format of TSR message is different as it is transmitted via GSM-R in CTCS-3 instead it is Eurobalise in CTCS-2. There are some additional user messages in CTCS-3, e.g. Conditional level transition, RBC switching command, Wireless network registering, etc. On-board control modes, which are introduced in the next section. 2.2 Control Modes There are some differences between control modes in CTCS-2, CTCS-3 and ETCS [1, 2], which are briefed in Table 2: Ref ETCS CTCS-3 CTCS-2 Note 1 FS FS FS Full Supervision 2 OS OS SR Staff Responsible (On Sight) 3 CO CO OS On Sight (Call On) 4 SH SH SH Shunting 5 IS IS IS Isolation 6 SB SB SB Stand By 7 SL SL SL (only for Intercity Railway) Sleeping 8 PS (only for degraded CTCS-2) PS Partial Supervision 9 CS (only for degraded CTCS-2) CS (only for Intercity Railway) Cab Signal 10 TR TR Trip 11 PT PT Post Trip 12 NP No Power 13 PS Passive Shunting 14 LS Limited Supervision 14 NL Non-leading The New Development of CTCS in the Intercity Railway Page 3 of 9

15 UN Unfitted 16 SF System Failure 17 STM SE STM European (been removed already) 18 STM SN STM National 19 RV Reversing 20 AM (only for Intercity Railway) Table 2: Control Modes Major control modes in CTCS-3 are very similar to ETCS. There are some differences in CTCS-2. For example, the cab signal and are still available in IS mode in CTCS-2, while the driver will take all responsibility in ETCS as all on-board signalling equipment are isolated to other vehicle equipment (e.g. braking system). 3 INTERCITY RAILWAY APPLICATION 3.1 Features of Intercity Railway The major features of Intercity Railways are: It is only for passenger trains and has large passenger flow volumes. The operation is similar to bus or metro. The minimum headway is 3 minutes and the station stop time is about 30s 60s. Trains will return to depot during the night period. It normally requires mixture of lines on ground, tunnel and bridges. The distance between stations is about 5km to 10km.There is platform screen door or safety door in the station areas. It uses the Electric Multiple Units (EMU) trains of short consist (at most 8 cars). The train speed is up to 250km/h (CTCS-3 is applied in conventional high-speed railway with train speed up to 350km/h). The Intercity Railway lines in an area consists of a network, for which independent operation centres are required. But there are needs that high-speed trains will travel to external mainlines outside the Intercity Railway network. Passenger exchange is also required when an Intercity Railway line interfaces with city metro or light rail services. Compared with the conventional high speed railway, the Intercity Railway has more passenger flows, automatic train operation, platform screen door (PSD) and other new equipment interfaces. Compared with the conventional metro/underground, the Intercity Railway adopts high-speed trains with the speed up to 250km/h, applies area certral dispatching (CTC) and needs good interoperable capability within and outside the local Intercity Railway network. So the new solution of train control system for Intercity Railway control, among different train control solutions, is proposed on the CTCS-2 plus the functions of ATO (Automatic Train Operation) and PSD. 3.2 Related ATC Examples The ATC (Automatic Train Control) technology has been developed to many different variations to accommodate different application requirements. Some of them with ATO functions will be applied in the railway similar to the Chinese Intercity Railway, for example: ERATO in municipal railways in China [3] A new ATC technical solution is proposed for municipal railways in China, which is managed by the local city operators. Wenzhou S1 line is an example of a city railway which is very similar to the Intercity Railway. However, it requires a lower train speed (up to 120km/h) but better operational headway (180s at a minimum) as the length of the city railway lines and the distance between stations are shorter. Basically, the signalling solution of Wenzhou S1 (hereafter referred to as ERATO) will combine the architecture and functions of ETCS-1 and ATO. However, the continuous vehicle-wayside wireless The New Development of CTCS in the Intercity Railway Page 4 of 9

communication based on the 802.11a is adopted instead of GSM-R in the stations and station approaching areas. The solution of ERATO is provided with functions of intermittent ATP/ATO and automatic driverless turn back. In addition, continuous safety protection will be provided for platform emergency stop and PSD in areas nearby platforms. The automatic open/close of train doors and PSDs are interlocked under intermittent ATP plus manual (iatpm+) mode as well as under intermittent ATO (iato) mode. The ATP and ATO subsystems in ERATO will adopt the existing metro CBTC equipment and amend them with lower cost than CBTC so that it is interoperable in the municipal railway network area. The system architecture will support expanding to CBTC system in future. However, it does not comply with the full ETCS-1 and is not interoperable in lines with ETCS-1 or CTCS-2 outside the municipal railway network. European ATO over ETCS [4] An interoperable ATO over ETCS has been recently raised in Europe as per UNISIG. Implementation of GoA2 (Semi-automated) is planned by 2015, and GoA3/4 (Driverless/Unattended operation) is planned by 2022. ATO is an add-on complementing ETCS. No safety functions are required for ATO. The System Requirement Specification (ERTMS Subset-125) and Interface Specification (Subset-126, 130-133) will be a basis of design. 3.3 Selection of Technical Solutions As mentioned in the Introduction of this article, the Intercity Railway needs innovative signalling technology for its new features. There are two principles for design of Intercity Railway train control system: To change the designs on the current train control equipment as little as possible To avoid increasing equipment too much, which would result in a more complex system and more maintenance cost in future Several popular ATC technical solutions are compared in Table 3: CBTC in Metro Intermittent ATC ETCS-1 CTCS-2 Minimum Headway 60s 150s 180s 180s Maximum Train Speed 120km/h 120km/h 250km/h 250km/h Vehicle-Wayside Communication Capability of PSD and Train Door Control Interoperability to Chinese Mainline Wireless (WLAN, Leaky cable, or Waveguide, etc.) Balise Eurobalise Track Circuit High Low Low Low Low Low Medium High Technical Storage in China High High Medium High Cost of Change for Intercity Railway Functions* Eurobalise Low Medium Medium Medium *: For example, ATO, Vehicle-Wayside Wireless Communication, Additional I/O, etc. Table 3: Comparison of ATC Solutions The solution of CTCS-2 + ATO for Intercity Railway was determined finally due to the reasons below: Comparing with the conventional high speed railway, the solution supports: More passenger flow and bus operation mode Platform screen door (PSD). Other new equipment interfaces. The New Development of CTCS in the Intercity Railway Page 5 of 9

Comparing with the conventional metro/underground, the solution supports: Train speed up to 250km/h. Interoperable capability. Area central dispatching. Train control systems complying with CTCS-2 and CTCS-3 specification have been successfully developed and deployed in the Chinese high-speed railway lines. But the existing CTCS or ETCS cannot meet some of the new requirements of Intercity Railway, especially the functions of automatic train operation required. However, Chinese local signalling suppliers have already had plenty of supporting technology in the CTCS development, which will save a great deal of cost and time as well as technical risks to meet the design target. 4 INTERCITY RAILWAY APPLICATION 4.1 System Description The Intercity Railway train control system structure is based on the CTCS-2 system architecture, with a few new wayside and on-board ATO equipment and changes on the existing CTCS-2 equipment [5]. The system architecture, equipment configuration and information transmission network structure of the Intercity Railway Train Control System (that is CTCS-2 + ATO, hereinafter referred to as IRTCS) is shown in Figure 1: TRAIN VEHICLE ATO ATP STM BTM SDU GSM-R PSD LEU TC TC LEU PSD CBI Local CTC STATION TCC SCS SCS: Signalling Centralized Supervision Equipment Signalling Safety Data Nework SCS TCC Local CTC STATION CBI CTC Dispatching Data Network Signalling Monitoring Data Network TSRS CTC CCS E1 GSM-R OPERATION CENTER WAYSIDE Figure 1: CTCS-2 + ATO System Architecture There are some new major features in the IRTCS system: On-board ATO controller. Automatic operation mode (AM). Automatic adjustment of timetable in Centralized Traffic Control System (CTC). The New Development of CTCS in the Intercity Railway Page 6 of 9

Interlocking control of between PSDs and train doors. Communication & Control Server (CCS). Protection on abnormal status from Anti-Flood Door (AFD) and Emergency Close Button (ECB) in platform. CSD (Circuit Switched Data) based GSM-R Wireless Vehicle-Wayside Communication of ATO/PSD related information. Interoperability in the Intercity Railway network and national high-speed railway network. 4.2 On-board ATO In AM mode, the on-board ATO equipment automatically controls the propulsion, braking and coasting as per timetables and adjustment commands received from the CTC via CCS, so that trains automatically operate between stations, stop and depart in stations, and turn back, in energy saving methods. The AM mode is only available when the on-board equipment is in the FS mode and all ATO related equipment is normal. The on-board ATO system supplied by a few suppliers is altered from the current existing CTCS-3 on-board equipment, which incorporate the both Vital Computers (VC) respectively implementing CTCS-3 functions and CTCS-2 functions as degrade mode. The VC is changed to an ATO controller, removing functions of CTCS-3. Some suppliers add new on-board ATO controllers based on their CTCS-2 on-board equipment. As well as the system level on-board ATO functions, a few major safety-related functions are identified: Train door control to mitigate hazards that doors are closed in an improper timing, which requires ATP to enable door open/close as well. Jerk rate control - to avoid the train speed unnecessarily triggering the ATP braking curve so that passengers are hurt during the drastic braking, which will be guaranteed by accurate measurement of location and speed, and proper speed control as well. Automatic departure to mitigate hazard that a train departs without the driver s manual confirmation. 4.3 Layout of ATO Related Eurobalise The layout rules of Eurobalise in IRTCS are same as those in CTCS-2. Any additional Eurobalise in IRTCS will not affect trains operate in railway lines with CTCS-2 system. To enable the functions of ATO, some Eurobalise are added [6]: Station track localization (JD) Eurobalise - for trains stop in station track accurately. There are 5 JD Eurobalise located in a station with track switch and 3 in a station without track switch. Communication management Eurobalise utilizes ETCS-42 data packet to send CCS s equipment number and dial number to vehicle for registration, similar to that for RBC in CTCS-3. Station starting Eurobalise - 1 fixed Eurobalise is added in the arrival (reverse direction) Eurobalise group (FJZ) for on-board ATO equipment receiving track data to the starting signal in next station. 4.4 Communication & Control Server The IRTCS introduces CCS as the centre of wayside ATO, and doesn t take advantage of the existing TCC, CBI or TSRS to take the roles of the CCS. There were two options: Station control equipment (such as TCC or CBI) to transmit the ATO related information between CTC and On-board ATO equipment. Station control equipment are located in different stations alone the line. It will require more interfaces in CTC and increase many cables from operation control centre to stations. Centre control equipment (such as TSRS) to transmit the ATO related information between CTC and On-board ATO equipment. The TSRS is located in the operation control centre and it can interface CTC directly. However, TSRS need station equipment to interface PSDs in each station via relay interfaces. This will result in significant changes on the existing design of TSRS. The New Development of CTCS in the Intercity Railway Page 7 of 9

In this case, new independent centralised equipment, CCS, will be a better solution, which will avoid too much alternation to the current mature CTCS-2 train control system. The major interfaces of CCS are shown in Figure 2: CTC DF1 DF2 ONBOARD CCS Maintenance Workstation DF9 CCS DF7 DF8 DF5 DF6 ATP ATO DF3 DF4 PSD DF11 DF10 TCC Main Data Frames: DF1 Train operating plan, PIS messages, Turn-back command DF2 Acknowledgement of operation plan, Train status report, Equipment Status report DF3 PSD relay status, Emergency Stop Button relay state DF4 PSD relay control command DF5 Receipt of ATO operation plan DF6 ATO operation plan, Turn-back command, PIS messages, DF7 Train position report, Train status report, PSD open/close command DF8 PSD Status DF9 Alarm information, Train status, Equipment status, CTC&ATO operation plan, CCS status DF10 PSD relay contact status DF11 PSD relay driven instruction Figure 2: CCS Interfaces The purpose of the CCS is for interlocking between platform screen/safety door and train door, transmission and processing of train operation timetable as bidirectional data interface between vehicle and wayside. The major features of CCS are: One CCS is configured for one Intercity Railway line normally. Additional CCSs can be added if actual requirement in the line exceeds the capacity of one CCS. CCS will interface PSD, ECB (Emergency Close Button) and AFD (Anti-Flood Door) via TCC s relay interface. CCS sends Door Open command to PSD via TCC only when it received the confirmation of the train stop and steady. CCS will interface CTC to distribute its train timetables and adjustment commands to corresponding onboard ATO via GSM-R. 4.5 System Testing Intercity Railway lines are springing up in China, in which there are 20 lines planned in the Pearl River Delta Intercity Railway network by the year of 2030, withthree of these already under construction. The network covers all major cities in the area of Pearl River Delta with Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Zhuhai as network centres. China Railway Company (CRC, former MoR) manages four major local signalling suppliers revising and developing the IRTCS technical specifications and IRTCS wayside and on-board subsystems respectively. The interface testing between equipment supplied by different suppliers have been implemented in lab. The onsite The New Development of CTCS in the Intercity Railway Page 8 of 9

interoperability testing is planned this year on the Dongguan-Huizhou line, one of above three lines under construction. The testing of interoperability of on-board and wayside equipment between different suppliers will be a challenge during the onsite test, as the equipment with some new functions has not been validated in previous applications. The IRTCS Testing Specification is produced by suppliers and CRC together. Three stages of testing are specified: Laboratory Simulation Testing Suppliers test its equipment respectively as per IRTCS specifications in a simulation system. The simulation system includes four parts: wayside platform, on-board platform, GSM-R network platform and simulation testing platform. Laboratory Interoperability Testing On-board equipment and wayside equipment from different suppliers are connected via GSM-R and cable network to test their interoperability. Onsite System Testing Functions, key parameters and interoperability will be validated via on-site testing with two equipped train, actual wayside equipment and GSM-R network in the trial section of Dongguan-Huizhou line. The main content of testing need include test cases in aspects below [7]: ATO scenario testing Control modes switching of on-board equipment Interoperability testing Interface testing 5 CONCLUSION The Intercity Railway Train Control System is developed based on mature CTCS-2, which allows Intercity Railway to be compatible with the Passenger Dedicated Line with CTCS-2 train control systems. It provides the possibility that trains of Intercity Railway are capable to travel in the network of Chinese national high-speed lines, and CTCS-2 equipped trains are capable to travel in Intercity Railway network. This is achieved with limited cost in short term since local signalling suppliers have already the strong technical basis to develop, manufacture and integrate CTCS system and its subsystems as well as the CBTC ATO equipment. The solution also provides the basis to support future development of ATO over CTCS-3 for high-speed railway as most wayside and on-board equipment as well as the GSM-R can be shared. It could also provide references for ATO over CTCS-1 and ATO over ETCS. However, the IRTCS is a new system. Its function, performance, safety and reliability are to be verified in the coming onsite system testing, interoperability testing, and long-term commercial service. REFERENCES 1. Ming F, Study of CTCS Technical Specifications, China Academy of Railway Science, 2013 2. Shu G Z, General Technical Specification of CTCS-3 Train Control System, Ministry of Railway, China, 2008 3. Jin K Q, ATC System Technical Specification of Wenzhou City Railway S1 Signalling System, United Mechanical & Electrical Co., Ltd., 2014.8 4. Benoit B, ATO over ETCS Presentation, UNISIG, 2014.10 5. China Railway Company, General Technical Specification of CTCS-2+ATO Train Control System for Intercity Railway (Provisional), 2013.6 6. CRSCD, Application Scheme of ATO Balise for Intercity Railway Train Control System, 2013.12 7. China Railway Company, etc., Test Outline of Intercity Railway CTCS-2 +ATO Train Control System, 2014.5 The New Development of CTCS in the Intercity Railway Page 9 of 9