EVALUATION OF NITROGEN PRODUCTS APPLIED ON PERENNIAL RYEGRASS DURING THE SPRING SEASON IN RIVERSIDE, CA SUBMITTED BY: SPONSORED BY: AND

Similar documents
Longevity of turf response to urea, coated urea, and blends

Charles T. Golob, William J. Johnston, and Matt Williams Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University January 6, 2009

Final Report: Segway X2 Traffic Study (2007)

Performance of Fine Fescue Cultivars and Selections ( )

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

To evaluate 120 commercial and experimental varieties of perennial ryegrass under low mowing height, high maintenance conditions in central Indiana.

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Sprinkler System Waiver Application Packet

Efficacy of Selected Acaricides on Spider Mites in Corn 2010

Thirty Years of Climatological Data: 1969 to 1998

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. DuPont K4 Spring Timing Test

Our objective was to determine which of the 134 cultivars of perennial ryegrass were best adapted to Indiana growing conditions.

Table 1. Application timing, plant stage, environmental conditions. Date 5/27 6/21 7/7 Treatment

Distribution Uniformity of Multi Stream Multi Trajectory Rotary Nozzles Spaced Below Recommended Distance

CONCLUSIONS No crop response was observed at any time for any of the treatments in this trial.

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center

A spring broccoli variety trial was conducted in 2017 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

Forecast El Niño Southern Oscillation Phases and Best Irrigation Strategies to Increase Cotton Yield

Greenbush School Maintenance Calendar

Appendix E Water Supply Modeling

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Form

Giant foxtail was effectively control with all PRE/POST and total POST treatments, 99 percent control (9/21 rating date).

2009 Table Beet Weed Control Trials Methods: Trial No. 1: Trial No. 2: Results: Trial No. 1: Trial No. 2:

Evaluation of Preemergence and Postemergence Systems in Field Corn in SUMMARY

University of Georgia, CES Evaluation of Homeowner Preemergence Herbicide Formulations for Crabgrass Control in Common Bermudagrass.

Spring and Fall beet variety trials were conducted in 2018 at the University of Delaware research farm near Georgetown, DE.

Comparison of weed control programs with herbicides containing bicyclopyrone and their standards in field corn in SE Minnesota in 2013

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Sumagic (Uniconazole) for Growth Control of Ornamental Kale (Brassica oleracea Nagoya Mix )

Comparisons of PRE/POST Weed Control Programs in Field Corn at Rochester, MN in 2015

Field Calibration of Woodruff, Mehlich and Sikora Buffer Tests for Determining Lime Requirement for Missouri soils

SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE IN OREGON IN 1999

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

Breitenbach, Fritz R., Lisa M. Behnken, Jeffrey L. Gunsolus, Reed Searcy, and Jared Liebenow

Sequential Preemergence/Postemergence Herbicide Systems in Soybean for the Control of Giant Ragweed in Southeastern Minnesota in 2015.

Title: 2011 Off-Station Spring Wheat evaluations in the Western Triangle Area

2001 NTEP Tall Fescue Test 2002 Results Dan Weisenberger. Objective

Comparison of Weed Management Programs to Halex GT Herbicide in Field Corn in SE Minnesota in 2010 Date 4/21 5/22 6/3 6/16 Treatment

Table 2. Evaluation of herbicide systems to control giant ragweed in soybeans at Rochester, MN in Pest Code AMBTR YIELD Pest Name Giant ragweed

LOCAL CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA

2017 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

TREATMENT OF ONION BULBS WITH "SURROUND" TO REDUCE TEMPERATURE AND BULB SUNSCALD

Performance Testing of Tall Fescue Turfgrasses at Oklahoma State University, Stillwater

2015 Evaluation of Field Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Crane Inspection Log. Mailing Address: P.O. Box Tulsa, OK Phone: (918) Fax: (918)

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2015.

PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES

Date 5/21 Treatment. POST I Temperature (F) Air 65 Soil 70.2 Relative Humidity (%) 50 Wind (mph) 8 Soil Moisture. Adequate Corn

Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Form

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Title: 2012 Off-Station Spring Barley evaluations in the Western Triangle Area

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

University of GA Coop Ext Service

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Kentucky bluegrass Varietal Trial National Turfgrass Evaluation Program - Final Report 2000 C.E. Miluch

ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Pendulum 2G (Pendimethalin) On English Lavender (Lavandula angustifolia Vera )

Regional Feedstock Partnership 2011 Switchgrass Report

Planting Date: Planting Method: Broadcast Rate: 10 lb/1000 sq ft

Regional Feedstock Partnership 2010 Switchgrass Report

Evaluation of Difficult to Control Broadleaf Weeds with an HPPD Herbicide Based Program in Soybean in SE Minnesota in 2016.

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Inheritance of chinch bug resistance in grain pearl millet

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

EVALUATION OF REDUCED RISK INSECTICIDES FOR CODLING MOTH MANAGEMENT IN ENGLISH WALNUTS 2005

(TURF1402) Site Description Page 1 of 5 University of GA Coop Ext Service Poa annua Control in Overseeded 'Tifway' Bermudagrass.

2017 Adjusted Count Report February 12, 2018

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1

Variety testing of Poa pratensis, Festuca rubra, Lolium perenne and Dactylis glomerata

Switchgrass in Québec

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

CRW/Standard Efficacy Final Report 5 December 2011

1997 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

FLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA. S. S. LaHue - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Evaluation of spring wheat cultivar performance under continuous-crop and crop-crop-fallow systems in central Montana

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

EVALUATION OF REFLEX AND BICYCLOPYRONE FOR WEED CONTROL IN DIRECT-SEEDED ONION

Action Requested From AMWG

CCoWS. Central Coast Watershed Studies. Summary of Precipitation and Streamflow for Potrero and San Clemente Creeks in Water-Year 2007

EFFECTS OF HEATING AND FREEZING ON TRANSLUCENT SCALE IN ONION BULBS

Performance of Ryegrass Varieties in Alabama, ii/

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Roundup GPA Test

11/22/2009 (C18 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 13 University of Georgia. Managing GR Palmer amaranth in LL and RR cotton.

Weather conditions in May were relatively dry, and affected activation of the PRE herbicides.

Weed Control Trials in Onions

Design Criteria Data

Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013

Turfgrass Association of Australia (ACT Incorporated) Perennial Rye, Seeded Couch and Tall Fescue evaluation Trials

2012 Turfgrass Proceedings

Design Criteria Data

EVALUATION OF SUGAR BEET VARIETIES IN CENTRAL OREGON, Marvin Butler and Neysa Farris. Abstract

Acknowledgments This research was supported by the National Turfgrass Evaluation Program and The Midwest Regional Turf Foundation.

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Design Criteria Data

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Command Extra/Gauntlet Test

Design Criteria Data

Transcription:

EVALUATION OF NITROGEN PRODUCTS APPLIED ON PERENNIAL RYEGRASS DURING THE SPRING SEASON IN RIVERSIDE, CA SUBMITTED BY: Robert Green Richard Autio Grant Klein Francisco Merino SPONSORED BY: CEDAR CHEMICAL CORPORATION J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY O.M. SCOTT & SONS COMPANY PURSELL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE JULY 18, 1994

I. SUMMARY The objective of this study was to evaluate nitrogen products applied on perennial ryegrass during the spring season in Riverside, California. The study was conducted on a uniform 4.5- month old stand of Manhattan II perennial ryegrass, maintained under general turfgrass conditions. A total of 21 different nitrogen product treatments were evaluated for 4 months (February 10 to June 10) as follows: 15 treatments were applied once at 4 lb N/1,000 ft 2 ; 4 treatments were applied twice at 2 lb N/1,000 ft 2 ; and 2 treatments were applied 4 times at 1 lb N/1,000 ft 2. Visual turfgrass quality and clipping yields were measured on a biweekly schedule commencing 2 weeks and 1 month, respectively, after the initiation of the study. Results showed that there were significant differences among the treatments on each rating date for visual turfgrass quality. Of the 15 products applied once at 4 lb N/1,000 ft 2, Multicote II (12-0-43) and (24-8-16), and Polyon (30-3-6) and (29-3-6) provided 4-month long acceptable visual turfgrass quality. The remaining products in this group provided acceptable visual turfgrass quality for varying durations. In general, the visual turfgrass quality scores of products applied 2 times at 2 lb N/1,000 ft 2 or 4 times at 1 lb N/1,000 ft 2 were similar to the products applied 1 time at 4 lb N/1,000 ft 2. Clipping yields were significantly different among nitrogen treatments for each collection date. Nitrogen treatments also were different for rate of clipping yield production during the 4-month evaluation. That is, some treatments had a high production of clippings, followed by a rapid reduction, while other treatments produced a more even production of clippings during the 4 months. These data suggest nitrogen release rate differences among the treatments. In terms of the sum total clipping production for 4 months, there were significant differences among the treatments. However, there does not appear to be any major differences between products applied once, twice, or four times.

II. MATERIALS AND METHODS A summary of the study is shown in Tables 1, 2, and 3. The study was conducted on a uniform 4.5-month stand of perennial ryegrass maintained under general turfgrass conditions. A total of 21 different nitrogen product treatments were evaluated for 4 months (February 10 to June 10) during the spring season in Riverside, California, as follows: 15 treatments were applied once at 4 lb N/1,000 ft 2 ; 4 treatments were applied twice at 2 lb N/1,000 ft 2 ; and 2 treatments were applied 4 times at 1 lb N/1,000 ft 2. Visual turfgrass quality and clipping yields were measured on a biweekly schedule commencing 2 weeks and 1 month, respectively, after the initiation of the study. Environmental measurements were collected from a California Irrigation Management System (CIMIS) weather station located on the turfgrass plots (Table 4).

TABLE 1. MATERIALS AND METHODS OUTLINE. CULTIVAR: Manhattan II perennial ryegrass LOCATION: A fairly mature and very uniform field plot established on September 28, 1993 at the UCR Turfgrass Research Project. The soil is classified as a Hanford fine sandy loam. Analysis of the soil at the initiation of the study showed: ph = 7.5; TKN % = 0.042; P = 20 ppm; and K-Sol = 7.4 ppm. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A randomized complete block design with 4 replications/treatment. Individual plot size was 4.5 X 6 feet = 27 ft 2. NITROGEN TREATMENTS: (See Table 2). MOWING: Plots were mowed once per week with a walk-behind rotary mower set at 1-1/2 inches. IRRIGATION: Plots were irrigated as needed to prevent visual drought symptoms. Irrigation rates were calculated in accordance with an on-site CIMIS station. MEASUREMENTS: Visual turfgrass quality was taken biweekly beginning 2 weeks after initial treatment applications using a 1-9 scale with 1 = poorest, 5 = acceptable, and 9 = best perennial ryegrass. Clipping yields were taken biweekly beginning 1 month after initial treatment applications. Yields which were from 7 days growth were collected from a single lengthwise pass per plot from a Great States model push reel mower. Clippings were dried for 48 hours in a forced air oven maintained at 70C. Clippings collected represent a 5.3 ft 2 subsample of the 27.0 ft 2 plots.

TABLE 2. NITROGEN TREATMENTS EVALUATED DURING THE SPRING SEASON IN RIVERSIDE, CA. Lb N/1,000 FT 2 PRODUCT APPLICATION DATE: FEB. 10 MARCH 15 APRIL 19 MAY 10 TOTAL Multicote II (12-0-43) 4 -- -- -- 4 Multicote II (24-0-24) 4 -- -- -- 4 Multicote II (24-8-16) 4 -- -- -- 4 Multicote II (40-0-0) 4 -- -- -- 4 Osmocote (40-0-0) 4 -- -- -- 4 Par Ex IBDU (31-0-0) 4 -- -- -- 4 Par Ex IBDU (24-4-12) 4 -- -- -- 4 SulfurKote II (38-0-0) 4 -- -- -- 4 TriKote (39-0-0) 4 -- -- -- 4 Polyon (43-0-0) 4 -- -- -- 4 Polyon (30-3-6) 4 -- -- -- 4 Polyon (29-3-6) 4 -- -- -- 4 Scotts (43-0-0) 4 -- -- -- 4 Multicote (18-3-18) 4 -- -- -- 4 K-Power (16-4-16) 4 -- -- -- 4 Best SCU (38-0-0) 2 -- 2 -- 4 S 8385 (25-3-10) 2 -- 2 -- 4 TriKote (39-0-0) 2 -- 2 -- 4 Scotts (43-0-0) 2 -- 2 -- 4 K-Power (13-0-44) 1 1 1 1 4 Turf Supreme (16-6-8) 1 1 1 1 4 Weeks after initial application: (4.7) (9.7) (12.7)

TABLE 3. CALENDAR OF THE NITROGEN PRODUCT EVALUATION STUDY DURING THE SPRING SEASON IN RIVERSIDE, CA. DATE ACTIVITY February 10 February 24 to June 10 March 10 to June 9 March 15 April 19 May 10 June 10 Initial application of treatments. Biweekly ratings of visual turfgrass quality. Biweekly measurements of clipping yields. Application of treatments that were applied once every month. Application of treatments that were applied once every month and once every two months. Application of treatments that were applied once every month. Study completed.

TABLE 4. ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS DURING THE NITROGEN PRODUCT EVALUATION STUDY DURING THE SPRING SEASON IN RIVERSIDE, CA. ACCUMULATIVE AVERAGE DAILY ACCUMULATIVE WEEKLY AVERAGE DAILY AVERAGE DAILY SOIL TEMPERATURE WEEKLY ET o PRECIPITATION SOLAR RADIATION TEMPERATURE (10.2 - CM DEPTH) DATE (mm/week) (mm/week) (W/m 2 /day) ( o C) ( o C) 2/6-2/12 18.01 25.00 137 12 12 2/13-2/19 17.42 23.00 136 12 11 2/20-2/26 18.76 8.00 170 12 12 2/27-3/5 22.63 0 170 16 14 3/6-3/12 19.47 17.00 141 14 15 3/13-3/19 31.06 28.00 214 18 16 3/20-3/26 20.62 16.00 178 12 15 3/27-4/2 28.71 0 217 16 16 4/3-4/9 25.90 4.00 212 15 17 4/10-4/16 33.93 0 260 18 17 4/17-4/23 29.98 0 227 18 19 4/24-4/30 20.30 11.00 182 12 16 5/1-5/7 27.19 1.00 204 15 19 5/8-5/14 26.38 4.00 221 17 20 5/15-5/21 26.95 5.00 227 15 19 5/22-5/28 29.48 0 234 18 20 5/29-6/4 37.35 0 269 22 22 6/5-6/11 39.53 0 302 21 23 ET o = Reference evapotranspiration.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Visual turfgrass quality ratings were significantly different among nitrogen treatments for each rating date during the 4-month evaluation (Table 5). In terms of the 15 products applied once at 4 lb N/1,000 ft 2, there were differences among them for the duration they produced acceptable visual quality ( 5.0). Products that provided 4-month long acceptable visual turfgrass quality included Multicote II (12-0-43) and (24-8-16), and Polyon (30-3-6) and (29-3- 6). The other products produced acceptable visual quality for varying durations. Applying 4 lb N/1,000 ft 2 in one application may not be that commonly practiced. However, these data may represent differences among the 15 products for nitrogen release rates. In general, the visual turfgrass quality scores of products applied 2 times at 2 lb N/1,000 ft 2 or 4 times at 1 lb N/1,000 ft 2 were similar to the products applied 1 time at 4 lb N/1,000 ft 2. Clipping yields were significantly different among nitrogen treatments for each collection date (Table 6). In terms of the products applied once at 4 lb N/1,000 ft 2, there were striking differences among the products for the rate of clipping yield production during the 4-month evaluation. That is, several products started with a relatively high production of clippings, followed by a rapid reduction, while other products produced a more even production of clippings during the 4 months. The above observation most likely represents an indirect indicator of nitrogen release rate differences among the products. One also can note differences among the products for total clipping yields which may be an indirect indicator of the amount of nitrogen released and then absorbed by the turf. In terms of the products applied 2 times at 2 lb N/1,000 ft 2 or 4 times at 1 lb N/1,000 ft 2, one can observe several products with a relatively even production of clippings during the 4-month evaluation, while the clipping production of other products was not as even. In terms of total clipping production for 4 months, there does not appear to be any major differences between products applied once, twice, or four times.

TABLE 5. VISUAL TURFGRASS QUALITY OF PERENNIAL RYEGRASS TREATED WITH 21 NITROGEN FERTILIZERS z. WEEKS AFTER INITIAL APPLICATION TREATMENTS 2 4.6 7.1 9.6 11.1 13.1 15.1 17.1 Overall 4 lb N/1,000 ft 2 (1x) Multicote II (12-0-43) 5.4 6.5 5.9 5.4 5.9 5.5 6.4 7.0 6.0 Multicote II (24-0-24) 4.6 5.9 6.0 5.5 5.5 4.7 5.7 5.6 5.5 Multicote II (24-8-16) 5.0 6.4 6.0 5.7 5.7 5.1 5.7 5.5 5.7 Multicote II (40-0-0) 4.5 6.0 5.9 5.9 5.4 4.7 5.4 5.5 5.4 Osmocote (40-0-0) 4.6 6.7 6.1 5.5 5.5 4.1 5.0 4.2 5.2 Par Ex IBDU (31-0-0) 4.7 6.4 6.1 5.5 5.5 4.6 5.5 5.1 5.4 Par Ex IBDU (24-4-12) 7.1 6.7 5.9 4.6 5.2 4.2 5.0 4.0 5.4 SulfurKote II (38-0-0) 8.0 6.9 5.2 4.6 4.7 3.9 4.6 4.2 5.3 TriKote (39-0-0) 6.2 6.9 5.6 4.6 5.1 3.7 5.1 4.2 5.2 Polyon (43-0-0) 4.5 5.2 6.0 6.1 5.9 5.6 5.9 5.5 5.6 Polyon (30-3-6) 5.2 6.1 6.3 5.9 5.9 5.5 5.7 5.6 5.8 Polyon (29-3-6) 5.6 6.4 6.2 5.7 5.7 4.9 5.5 5.2 5.7 Scotts (43-0-0) 5.4 5.6 5.2 4.4 4.7 4.6 5.5 5.7 5.2 Multicote (18-3-18) 8.0 6.7 5.6 4.8 4.6 3.9 4.5 4.0 5.3 K-Power (16-4-16) 8.2 6.6 5.4 4.4 4.4 3.9 4.9 4.0 5.2 2 lb N/1,000 ft 2 (2x) y Best SCU (38-0-0) 7.0 6.4 5.5 4.5 6.4 5.6 6.0 5.4 5.8 S 8385 (25-3-10) 5.5 6.2 5.2 4.5 6.4 5.6 6.2 5.6 5.7 TriKote (39-0-0) 5.4 6.4 5.2 4.2 5.2 5.6 6.4 5.6 5.5 Scotts (43-0-0) 4.9 5.4 4.5 4.1 4.7 4.6 5.5 5.7 4.9 1 lb N/1,000 ft 2 (4x) x K-Power (13-0-44) 5.6 5.9 6.0 4.2 5.9 6.0 7.0 6.0 5.8 Turf Supreme (16-6-8) 5.4 6.0 6.2 4.1 6.5 5.6 6.7 5.6 5.8 Check 3.6 4.4 3.0 3.7 3.5 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.5 LSD, P = 0.05 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 z Visual turfgrass quality rated on a 1 to 9 scale: 1 = worst, 9 = best, and 5 = acceptable perennial ryegrass. y Initial application date was February 10, and the second application was 9.7 weeks later. x Initial application date was February 10, and subsequent applications were made 4.7, 9.7, and 12.7 weeks later.

The effect of N source on visual turfgrass quality of Perennial Ryegrass. 9 8 Visual turfgrass quality (1 = poor, 5 = acceptable, 9 = best) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2.0 4.6 7.1 9.6 11.1 13.1 15.1 17.1 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.5 0..4 Weeks after iniital application LSD, P = 0.05 Multicote II (12-0-43) Multicote II (24-0-24) Multicote II (24-8-16) Multicote II (40-0-0) Osmocote (40-0-0) Par Ex IBDU (31-0-0) Par Ex IBDU (24-4-12) SulfurKote II (38-0-0) TriKote (39-0-0) @4 Polyon (43-0-0) Polyon (30-3-6) Polyon (29-3-6) Scotts (43-0-0) @4 Multicote (18-3-18) K-Power (16-4-16) Best SCU (38-0-0) S 8385 (25-3-10) TriKote (39-0-0) @2 Scotts (43-0-0) @2 K-Power (13-0-44) Turf Supreme (16-6-8) Check

TABLE 6. CLIPPING YIELDS OF PERENNIAL RYEGRASS TREATED WITH 21 NITROGEN FERTILIZERS (g/5.3 ft 2 /7 days). WEEKS AFTER INITIAL APPLICATION TREATMENTS 4.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 TOTAL 4 lb N/1,000 ft 2 (1x) Multicote II (12-0-43) 21.9 15.7 10.8 9.7 7.6 13.7 10.3 89.8 Multicote II (24-0-24) 10.6 16.8 11.7 10.1 6.5 11.8 8.0 85.0 Multicote II (24-8-16) 15.7 20.2 14.5 9.2 5.7 11.7 7.9 75.1 Multicote II (40-0-0) 10.8 22.0 17.5 8.9 5.3 11.0 7.0 82.6 Osmocote (40-0-0) 17.6 32.2 15.4 6.4 5.1 9.1 6.1 91.8 Par Ex IBDU (31-0-0) 12.7 17.6 15.0 10.2 6.7 10.1 6.8 79.0 Par Ex IBDU (24-4-12) 28.9 12.2 8.7 5.6 5.5 9.5 6.5 76.9 SulfurKote II (38-0-0) 36.0 15.2 6.3 4.3 4.4 9.7 5.7 81.6 TriKote (39-0-0) 32.0 14.2 8.6 4.7 5.2 9.4 5.9 80.0 Polyon (43-0-0) 8.1 17.2 15.7 12.4 6.1 11.3 7.8 78.7 Polyon (30-3-6) 10.3 15.6 14.8 10.2 6.0 11.4 8.3 76.7 Polyon (29-3-6) 16.0 15.2 15.2 8.7 5.1 10.2 7.4 77.7 Scotts (43-0-0) 10.4 9.1 8.2 5.6 5.8 12.4 9.0 60.6 Multicote (18-3-18) 35.5 10.6 8.0 4.3 4.7 9.6 5.1 77.8 K-Power (16-4-16) 37.6 9.0 4.7 2.7 4.8 9.7 4.9 73.4 2 lb N/1,000 ft 2 (2x) z Best SCU (38-0-0) 23.8 9.7 5.4 11.0 10.3 11.8 7.9 80.0 S 8385 (25-3-10) 12.3 10.1 8.3 9.9 8.4 12.3 8.3 69.7 TriKote (39-0-0) 15.0 10.3 7.0 6.6 9.8 14.4 8.6 71.8 Scotts (43-0-0) 10.2 7.0 6.5 6.2 5.8 12.6 9.3 57.6 1 lb N/1,000 ft 2 (4x) x K-Power (13-0-44) 11.7 18.8 7.3 9.1 7.7 16.9 8.9 80.4 Turf Supreme (16-6-8) 9.8 17.2 9.1 9.9 8.0 15.6 9.7 79.3 Check 4.2 4.8 4.9 3.1 4.1 8.1 3.3 32.5 LSD, P = 0.05 6.0 3.4 2.6 2.3 1.5 1.1 1.2 10.3 z Initial application date was February 10, and the second application was 9.7 weeks later. x Initial application date was February 10, and subsequent applications were made 4.7, 9.7, and 12.7 weeks later.

The effect of N source on clipping yields of Perennial Ryegrass. 40 Clipping yield (g / 5.3 ft² / 7 days) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 4 7 9 11 13 15 17 6.0 3.4 2.6 2.3 1.5 1.1 1.2 Weeks after iniital application LSD, P = 0.05 Multicote II (12-0-43) Multicote II (24-0-24) Multicote II (24-8-16) Multicote II (40-0-0) Osmocote (40-0-0) Par Ex IBDU (31-0-0) Par Ex IBDU (24-4-12) SulfurKote II (38-0-0) TriKote (39-0-0) @4 Polyon (43-0-0) Polyon (30-3-6) Polyon (29-3-6) Scotts (43-0-0) @4 Multicote (18-3-18) K-Power (16-4-16) Best SCU (38-0-0) S 8385 (25-3-10) TriKote (39-0-0) @2 Scotts (43-0-0) @2 K-Power (13-0-44) Turf Supreme (16-6-8) Check