Universal TAU-IIR Redirective, Non-Gating, Crash Cushion

Similar documents
Product Specification. ABSORB 350 TM TL-2 Non-Redirective, Gating, Crash Cushion Applied to Quickchange Moveable Barrier

VULCAN BARRIER TL-3 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

VULCAN BARRIER TL-3 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

BarrierGate. General Specifications. Manual Operations General Specifications

StopGate TM Barrier Arm GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

UNIVERSAL TAU-II-R. Installation and Maintenance Manual Supplement. NCHRP 350 TL-3 Redirective, Non-Gating, Reusable Impact Attenuaor

SUMMARY CHANGES FOR NCHRP REPORT 350 GUIDELINES [NCHRP (02)] Keith A. Cota, Chairman Technical Committee on Roadside Safety June 14, 2007

TRACC. Trinity Attenuating Crash Cushion

Crash Testing Growth Common Roadside Hardware Systems Draft FHWA and AASHTO Requirements for Implementing MASH 2015

Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware

ArmorGuard Barrier Portable Longitudinal Barrier

ArmorGuard Barrier Portable Longitudinal Barrier

Evaluation and Design of ODOT s Type 5 Guardrail with Tubular Backup

CrashGard. Sand Barrel System Product Guide

Plastic Safety Systems

VERIFICATION & VALIDATION REPORT of MGS Barrier Impact with 1100C Vehicle Using Toyota Yaris Coarse FE Model

SLED End Treatment System Manual

STI Project: Barrier Systems, Inc. RTS-QMB Longitudinal Barrier. Page 38 of 40 QBOR1. Appendix F (Continued) Figure F-3

W-Beam Guiderail Transition from Light to Heavy Posts

CrashGard. Sand Barrel System Product Guide

February 8, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/CC-104

NCHRP Report 350 Crash Testing and Evaluation of the S-Square Mailbox System

Safe-Stop TMA (Truck Mounted Attenuator) GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

Form DOT F (8-72) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Slotted Rail Guardrail Terminal

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION. X-Tension DS. is suitable for all road types: Motorways, country roads, city streets for speed categories up to 110 km/h.

NCHRP Report 350 Test 4-12 of the Modified Thrie Beam Guardrail

Rev. E September All rights in copyright preserved

November 16, 1998 Refer to: HNG-14. Mr. David Allardyce Mechanical Engineer B&B Electromatic Main Street Norwood, Louisiana 70761

SMART CUSHION INNOVATIONS

MASH TEST 3-37 OF THE TxDOT 31-INCH W-BEAM DOWNSTREAM ANCHOR TERMINAL

Development of Combination Pedestrian-Traffic Bridge Railings

Technical Report Documentation Page

CRASH TEST AND EVALUATION OF 3-FT MOUNTING HEIGHT SIGN SUPPORT SYSTEM

GUARDRAIL TESTING MODIFIED ECCENTRIC LOADER TERMINAL (MELT) AT NCHRP 350 TL-2. Dean C. Alberson, Wanda L. Menges, and Rebecca R.

A MASH Compliant W-Beam Median Guardrail System

Advances in Simulating Corrugated Beam Barriers under Vehicular Impact

Vehicle Crash Tests of Concrete Median Barrier Retrofitted with Slipformed Concrete Glare Screen

July 10, Refer to: HSA-10/CC-78A

July 17, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-176A

safedirection.com.au Ref: PM 017/02

MASH Test 3-11 on the T131RC Bridge Rail

SMART CUSHION INNOVATIONS

ROAD SAFETY PRODUCTS TAU TUBE TM FAMILY REDIRECTIVE CRASH CUSHIONS

Assembly Manual Stemmons Freeway Dallas, Texas 75207

June 27, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-176

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

(Item 1) PSS - Type III barricade with a lightweight light attachment, and with a variation in the panel spacing;

Development and Validation of a Finite Element Model of an Energy-absorbing Guardrail End Terminal

CRASH TEST OF MILE POST MARKER. T. J. Hirsch Research Engineer. and. Eugene Buth Assistant Research Engineer. Research Report Number 146-8

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

MASH TEST 3-11 OF THE TxDOT T222 BRIDGE RAIL

White Paper. Compartmentalization and the Motorcoach

End Terminals Installation and Repair Manual SMAT2 SMAT4

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

April 22, In Reply Refer To: HSA-10/WZ-206. Mr. Jan Miller TrafFix Devices 220 Calle Pintoresco San Clemente, California Dear Mr.

SAFETY PERFORMANCE OF WORK-ZONE DEVICES UNDER MASH TESTING

TO BE USED FOR MAINTENANCE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. 2 3/16" x 2 3/16" x 10 Ga. 12" 15.5" 1 1/2" x 1 1/2" x 12 Ga.

MASH08 TEST 3-11 OF THE ROCKINGHAM PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER

MASH TEST 3-11 OF THE TxDOT SINGLE SLOPE BRIDGE RAIL (TYPE SSTR) ON PAN-FORMED BRIDGE DECK

Midwest Guardrail System Without Blockouts

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

MASH 2016 Implementation: What, When and Why

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE MODIFIED G4(1S) GUARDRAIL UPDATE TO NCHRP 350 TEST NO WITH 28" C.G. HEIGHT (2214WB-2)

DEVELOPMENT OF A MASH TL-3 MEDIAN BARRIER GATE

W-Beam Approach Treatment at Bridge Rail Ends Near Intersecting Roadways

Installation and Maintenance Manual. End Terminals

VOLKSWAGEN. Volkswagen Safety Features

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE THE TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77843

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE FREE-STANDING TEMPORARY BARRIER UPDATE TO NCHRP 350 TEST NO (2214TB-1)

English version. Road restraint systems - Part 3: Performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test methods for crash cushions

Lee County DOT Traffic Section Design Standard for Sign Installation

June 5, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-178. Mr. Kevin K. Groeneweg Mobile Barriers LLC Genesee Trail Road Golden, CO Dear Mr.

Low-Speed Crash Test Protocol (Version V) May 2002

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE FREE-STANDING TEMPORARY BARRIER UPDATE TO NCHRP 350 TEST NO WITH 28" C.G. HEIGHT (2214TB-2)

Wyoming Road Closure Gate

Development of a Low-Profile Portable Concrete Barrier

Assessing Options for Improving Roadside Barrier Crashworthiness

TTMA-100 Trailer TMA. User s Manual. NCHRP 350 TL-3 Trailer Truck Mounted Attenuator

Technical Report Documentation Page Form DOT F (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized


AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, AASHTO/FHWA Joint Implementation Plan Standing Committee on Highways September 24, 2015

Analysis of Existing Work-Zone Sign Supports Using Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware Safety Performance Criteria

TEST REPORT No. 2 ALUMINUM BRIDGE RAIL SYSTEMS. Prepared for. The Aluminum Association Inc. 818 Connecticut Avenue Washington, D.C.

CRASH TEST AND EVALUATION OF TEMPORARY WOOD SIGN SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR LARGE GUIDE SIGNS

All specifications in this manual are subject to change without prior notice

Pupil Transportation Safety

MASH TEST 3-10 ON 31-INCH W-BEAM GUARDRAIL WITH STANDARD OFFSET BLOCKS

CRASH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

United States Code of Federal Regulations Title 49 Part 563

Operation and Maintenance VERDEGRO TTMA (100K)

An Analysis of Less Hazardous Roadside Signposts. By Andrei Lozzi & Paul Briozzo Dept of Mechanical & Mechatronic Engineering University of Sydney

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE THE TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77843

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE of Transportation Washington, D.C

s MEDIAN BARRIERS FOR TEXAS HIGHWAYS

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

DEFLECTION LIMITS FOR TEMPORARY CONCRETE BARRIERS

Development of a Heavy Containment Level Bridge Rail for Istanbul

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-09/

Table of Contents. Scorpion Truck Mounted Attenuator 1. Scorpion Trailer Attenuator 9. Big Sandy Sand Barrels 13. TrafFix Water-Wall 16

Transcription:

TB 110927 Rev. 0 Page 1 of 5 Product Specification Universal TAU-IIR Redirective, Non-Gating, Crash Cushion I. General The Universal TAU-IIR system is a Redirective, Non-Gating Crash Cushion in accordance with the definitions in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 350 (NCHRP Report 350) that uses re-useable and restorable energy absorbing elements (EAE). The system has been tested in narrow and wide configurations and performs in an acceptable manner in accordance with the guidelines of NCHRP Report 350 at Test level 2 (70 km/h) and Test Level 3 (100 km/h). The system performs acceptably in various configurations for different impact velocities and hazard widths. These configurations are shown in the Universal TAU-II System Configuration Chart (Figure 1). II. Performance The Universal TAU-IIR system is designed to absorb the impact energy of an errant vehicle in accordance with NCHRP Report 350 guidelines for Redirective, Non-Gating Crash Cushions. The system is designed for locations where both head-on and angled impacts are likely to occur and where it is desirable to have the majority of post impact trajectories on the impact side of the system. The design provides for a high degree of flexibility in applying the system to a wide range of hazard widths (up to 2.6 meters (8.5 feet)) in 150mm (6 inch) increments and a large variety of non-proprietary transitions to other highway barriers and structures. When installed in accordance with the manufacturer s instructions, the configurations shown in the Configuration Chart (Figure 1) under the 100 km/h (62.1 mph) column are capable of safely redirecting or stopping a 2000 kg (4400 lb) pick-up truck or a 820 kg (1800 lb) car impacting the system at 100 km/hr (62.1 mph) within the angles set forth in NCHRP Report 350. A. When properly installed according to the manufacturer s specifications, the systems shall be able to meet the recommended structural adequacy, occupant risk, and vehicle trajectory criteria set forth in NCHRP 350 for Test Level 3 (100 km/hr) Redirective, Non-Gating Crash Cushions. The NCHRP 350, Test Level 3 Test Matrix includes the following conditions: - 1 -

1. An 820 kg vehicle at 0 degrees and an offset of ¼ the width of the vehicle from the centerline of the system (Test 3-30). 2. A 2000 kg vehicle at 0 degrees and centered on the front of the system (Test 3-31). 3. An 820 kg vehicle at 15 degrees impacting the front of the system (Test 3-32). 4. A 2000 kg vehicle at 15 degrees impacting the front of the system (Test 3-33). 5. An 820 kg vehicle at 20 degrees impacting the side, near the front of the system (Test 3-36). 6. A 2000 kg vehicle at 20 degrees impacting the side, near the front of the system (Test 3-37). 7. A 2000 kg vehicle at 20 degrees impacting at the Critical Impact Point of the system. The critical impact point was determined to be the front of the backstop along the centerline of the system (Test 3-38). 8. A 2000 kg vehicle at -20 degrees (reverse direction) impact to the midpoint of the system (Test 3-39). B. The impact velocity of a hypothetical front seat passenger against the vehicle interior as calculated from the longitudinal vehicle acceleration and 600 mm [23 5/8 in] forward displacement, and the lateral vehicle acceleration and 300 mm [12 in] lateral vehicle displacement, shall be less than 12 m/s (39.3 ft/s). The highest 10 ms average vehicle acceleration in the longitudinal and lateral directions subsequent to the instant of hypothetical occupant impact shall be less than 20 g s in the NCHRP 350 testing matrix of the Universal TAU-IIR system. Detached debris shall not show potential for penetrating the vehicle occupant compartment or present a hazard to other traffic, pedestrians, or workers in a work zone. The vehicle shall remain upright during and after the collision, although moderate roll, pitch, and yaw may occur. Vehicle deformations shall not cause intrusion into the occupant compartment in excess of 150 mm (6 inches). III. Description of System A. The Universal TAU-IIR crash cushion is made up of independent collapsible bays that are guided and supported by high strength galvanized steel cables. The system s energy capacity is provided by an array of re-useable and - 2 -

restorable EAE. The systems shall be made up of the following components and shall be fabricated from materials conforming to the following specifications: 1. The foundation system for the Universal TAU-IIR consists of two cables, a Back Support and Front Cable Anchors as shown in Figure 2 or Figure 3. The Front Cable Anchor weighs approximately 35 kg (75 lb). The types of Cable Anchors and Back Supports can be selected based on the requirements of the specific site. a. All steel structural components of these assemblies shall be fabricated from mild steel in conformance with ASTM A-36 specifications. These components are hot dipped galvanized per ASTM A-123. b. Fasteners shall be Class 5.8 (Grade 2) or greater and galvanized in accordance with ASTM 153 or ASTM B695, Class 50. Washers shall be hardened and galvanized. c. The steel cables shall be at least 25 mm (1 in) diameter and galvanized in accordance with ASTM A-603. 2. Front and Middle Supports and the various sizes of Bulkheads (XL, XXL and XXXL) (Figure 2) separate each independent collapsible bay. Cable Guides bolt to the Middle Supports and Bulkheads, capturing the cables and connecting the bays to the foundation system. a. All Front and Middle Supports, Bulkheads and cable guides shall be fabricated from mild steel in conformance with ASTM A-36 specifications. These components are hot dipped galvanized per ASTM A- 123. b. All fasteners shall be Class 5.8 (Grade 2) or greater and galvanized in accordance with ASTM 153 or ASTM B695, Class 50. Washers shall be hardened and galvanized. 3. Each Bay is enclosed on the sides with Sliding Panels. Sliding Bolts fasten the panels to the Front and Middle Supports and Bulkheads. End Panels are attached to the Back Support and the last bays s Sliding Panels through Pipe Panel Mounts and provide transition mounting points. The Pipe Panel Mounts are bolted to the back support. - 3 -

a. Steel panels are to be fabricated from steel that conforms to the requirements of AASHTO M180 Class B. b. Sliding Bolts are to be cast from ASTM 1045 HT steel and galvanized per ASTM A-123. c. Steel Pipe Panel Mounts shall be fabricated from mild steel in conformance to ASTM A513, Type 5 specifications. d. Fasteners shall be Class 5.8 (Grade 2) or greater and galvanized in accordance with ASTM 153 or ASTM B695, Class 50. Washers shall be hardened and galvanized. 4. Flexible Front Support Legs and a Nose Piece mount to the Front Support. The Front Support Legs and Nose Piece are bolted in place. The Nose Piece provides a location to attach suitable delineation in conformance with local specifications (to be supplied by others). a. The front support legs shall be fabricated from either synthetic or natural rubber or polyurethane. b. The Nose Piece shall be fabricated from polyurethane. c. All fasteners shall be Class 5.8 (Grade 2) or greater and galvanized in accordance with ASTM 153 or ASTM B695, Class 50. Washers shall be hardened and galvanized. 5. Three types (Type 1, Type 2 & Type 3) of Energy Absorbing Elements provide the primary energy absorbing capacity for the system. The elements appear as a group of four connected cylinders. a. The Energy Absorbing Elements shall be molded from specially formulated Polyether Based Cast Urethane. B. The Universal TAU-IIR systems are available in various capacities, each requiring a specific configuration of Energy Absorbing Elements (Types 1, 2 & 3). The capacities and configurations are shown in the Universal TAU-IIR System Configuration Chart (Figure 1). C. The Universal TAU-IIR system shall require attachment to a foundation. Anchoring of the system will require attachment in accordance with the manufacturer s drawings and instructions. - 4 -

D. The TAU-IIR system shall be assembled, installed, and refurbished in accordance with the manufacturer s instructions. IV. Application of Safety Appurtenances Highway safety appurtenances should be applied to hazardous sites in accordance with the guidelines and recommendations in the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Roadside Design Guide, and other Federal Highway Administration and State Department of Transportation requirements. Placement of the TAU-IIR system must comply with these specifications and guidelines as well as those of the manufacturer. - 5 -