ACTIVE STICK & THROTTLE FOR F-35. Joseph Krumenacker NAVAIR Flight Controls / JSF Vehicle Systems 16 October 2008

Similar documents
The most important thing we build is trust. HeliSAS Technical Overview

FLIGHT CONTROLS SYSTEM

F135 Propulsion Integration Topics for Symposium on Jet Engines Haifa, Israel

Analysis of JSF Prototypes

CHAPTER 11 FLIGHT CONTROLS

MULTIBODY ANALYSIS OF THE M-346 PILOTS INCEPTORS MECHANICAL CIRCUITS INTRODUCTION

F-35 Sustainment Services

AIRCRAFT GENERAL KNOWLEDGE (2) INSTRUMENTATION

United States Army Aviation Center Fort Rucker, Alabama APRIL 2007

AIRCRAFT GENERAL KNOWLEDGE (2) INSTRUMENTATION

Electric VTOL Aircraft

Qualification Testing of High Rate of Fire Gun Systems

NASA Offices and Research GegteFs.

Skycar Flight Control System Overview By Bruce Calkins August 14, 2012

TECHNICAL PAPER 1002 FT. WORTH, TEXAS REPORT X ORDER

F/A-18A/B/C/D Flight Control Computer Software Upgrade

XIV.C. Flight Principles Engine Inoperative

Normal T/O Procedure. * * * Engine Failure on T/O * * *

System Normal Secondary Direct. All 3 PFC work in parallel. available. Pitch Normal Secondary Direct. Pitch maneuver command.

Flight Test Evaluation of C-130H Aircraft Performance with NP2000 Propellers

QuickStick Repeatability Analysis

Cessna Aircraft Short & Soft Field Takeoff & Landing Techniques

Super Squadron technical paper for. International Aerial Robotics Competition Team Reconnaissance. C. Aasish (M.

Steer-by-Wire Systems with Integrated Torque Feedback Improve Steering Performance and Reduce Cost

First Civilian Tiltrotor Takes Flight

BMAA FLIGHT TEST PLAN BMAA/AW/010a issue 2 Reg: Type: TADS or MAAN applying:

General. Lateral Control System. Longitudinal Control System

AEM 4321 / EE4231 Automatic Control Systems

CHAPTER 22 AUTOPILOT

MILITARY AIRCRAFT F-35. Photo courtesy U.S. Air Force/Airman 1st Class Caleb Worpel. Lockheed Martin photo/phaedra Loftis F-35 SUSTAINMENT SERVICES

DASSAULT AVIATION Proprietary Data

A brief History of Unmanned Aircraft

52 BACKYARDFLYER.COM FLY

Proposed Special Condition C-xx on Rudder Control Reversal Load Conditions. Applicable to Large Aeroplane category. Issue 1

Operational Liaison Meeting FBW aircraft. Avoiding Tail Strike

A310 MEMORY ITEMS Last Updated: 20th th October 2011

LOAD CELL USE IN AEROSPACE GROUND AND FLIGHT TEST APPLICATIONS A Honeywell White Paper

Hydraulic Proportional and Closed Loop System Design

Introducing Galil's New H-Bot Firmware

CHAPTER9 FLIGHT CONTROLS

Flightlab Ground School 13. A Selective Summary of Certification Requirements FAR Parts 23 & 25

Y. Lemmens, T. Benoit, J. de Boer, T. Olbrechts LMS, A Siemens Business. Real-time Mechanism and System Simulation To Support Flight Simulators

UAV KF-1 helicopter. CopterCam UAV KF-1 helicopter specification

Team Introduction Competition Background Current Situation Project Goals Stakeholders Use Scenario Customer Needs Engineering Requirements

Dealing with customer concerns related to electronic throttle bodies By: Bernie Thompson

CESSNA 182 TRAINING MANUAL. Trim Control Connections

Application of STPA to a Shift by Wire System (GM-MIT Research Project)

B737 Performance. Takeoff & Landing. Last Rev: 02/06/2004

DUCHESS BE-76 AND COMMERCIAL MULTI ADD-ON ORAL REVIEW FOR CHECKRIDE

Torque-Vectoring Control for Fully Electric Vehicles: Model-Based Design, Simulation and Vehicle Testing

Dr. Charles Kim. EcoCar Team 2 (R.E.V)

AERONAUTICAL DESIGN STANDARD PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION HANDLING QUALITIES REQUIREMENTS FOR MILITARY ROTORCRAFT

Presse-Information. The mycopter project points the way towards Personal Aerial Vehicles

Electromechanical Tilting Systems for Passenger Trains

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 7, July ISSN BY B.MADHAN KUMAR

PRIME MOVER CONTROLS INC. MARINE PROPULSION CONTROLS. Series MPC-CP SYSTEM

for Critical Applications in Extreme Environments

Section 1 Systems Descriptions

AIRCRAFT HYDRAULIC SYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES

AT-10 Electric/HF Hybrid VTOL UAS

Aircraft Level Dynamic Model Validation for the STOVL F-35 Lightning II

Bild : Bernhard Mühr German Aerospace Center Flight Operations

Compatibility of STPA with GM System Safety Engineering Process. Padma Sundaram Dave Hartfelder

Copyrighted material Taylor & Francis Not for resale

Investigation of Factors Affecting Loss of Control of GA Aircraft

Precision Strike Technology Symposium

Throttle Quadrant Operating Manual English Version

SECTION 2-13 FLIGHT CONTROLS

Control Design of an Automated Highway System (Roberto Horowitz and Pravin Varaiya) Presentation: Erik Wernholt

Robust Stability Analysis: a Tool to Assess the Impact of Biodynamic Feedthrough on Rotorcraft

Effect of ZFW / ZFWCG on Aircraft Operations

1.1 REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFTS

At all times use approved company publications and aircraft manufacturer manuals as sole reference for procedures and data!

Severe Service Hydraulic Actuators for the Nuclear Power Industry. Enertech Nuclear Qualified Electro-Hydraulic Actuators

XIV.D. Maneuvering with One Engine Inoperative

THE FALCON I LAUNCH VEHICLE Making Access to Space More Affordable, Reliable and Pleasant

STICTION/FRICTION IV STICTION/FRICTION TEST 1.1 SCOPE

RIGGING THE FLIGHT CONTROLS

Lateral Directional Flight Considerations

Characterisation of Longitudinal Response for a Full-Time Four Wheel Drive Vehicle

Compliance Checklist. 1 of 9. Legend: A-analysis, C-comparison, D-design, T-test FAR Amdt. Compliance Method Takeoff. Description

Multi-ECU HiL-Systems for Virtual Characteristic Rating of Vehicle Dynamics Control Systems

Airframes Instructor Training Manual. Chapter 6 UNDERCARRIAGE

Analysis. Techniques for. Racecar Data. Acquisition, Second Edition. By Jorge Segers INTERNATIONAL, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA

Development, Certification, and Flight Testing of an OPA for UAS FTT Development and Training at NTPS

AERONAUTICAL DESIGN STANDARD PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION HANDLING QUALITIES REQUIREMENTS FOR MILITARY ROTORCRAFT

Climber is 776B101101

Flight Testing the ATF Prototypes. YF-23 Paul Metz (F) YF-22 Mark Shackelford (M)

PA-28R 201 Piper Arrow

Step Motor. Mechatronics Device Report Yisheng Zhang 04/02/03. What Is A Step Motor?

Electric Drive - Magnetic Suspension Rotorcraft Technologies

CHAPTER 17 LIMITATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Full-Scale 1903 Wright Flyer Wind Tunnel Test Results From the NASA Ames Research Center

AIRWORTHINESS BULLETIN

DASSAULT AVIATION Proprietary Data

Autopilot Selection Guide

Cam Motion Case Studies #1 and # 2

Gyroplane questions from Rotorcraft Commercial Bank (From Rotorcraft questions that obviously are either gyroplane or not helicopter)

Appenidix E: Freewing MAE UAV analysis

SOLUTIONS OUR EXPERTISE YOUR SPECS SOLENOID VALVES FOR YOUR APPLICATION MINIATURE PILOTING GREAT. The Lee Company. Innovation in Miniature

Transcription:

ACTIVE STICK & THROTTLE FOR F-35 Joseph Krumenacker NAVAIR Flight Controls / JSF Vehicle Systems 16 October 2008

Intro Joe Krumenacker holds a BS in Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame, and previously worked for Grumman in aerodynamics, flight controls and flight test on the X-29 and F-14 programs. He joined the NAVAIR Flight Controls Branch in 1996 and has worked on the Joint Strike Fighter since 1999. He currently leads the JSF Program Office s Vehicle Control Integration team.

ACTIVE STICK & THROTTLE FOR F-35 Joseph Krumenacker NAVAIR Flight Controls / JSF Vehicle Systems 16 October 2008

JSF Active Inceptor System (AIS) Presentation Overview A. Why & What of Active Inceptors: JSF Inceptor Overview & Architecture Reconfiguration for AIS Degraded Modes AIS Specification Issues B. How have Active Inceptors been put to use: Current Uses of Active Capability Jetborne Advanced Modes Using Active Capability Lessons Learned C. Conclusions

Active Inceptor Overview As a system the AIS is partitioned into the following major elements Electronics Processor modules, motor drives, interfaces to FCC / grips Mechanics Gimbal assemblies, bearings, housings, seals & mountings Electromechanical Servo Actuator Units (SAUs), sensors Electronics Mechanics Electromechanical

Why Were Active Inceptors Chosen? Design Flexibility for STOVL Advanced Control Law JSF specification prohibits the use of a third inceptor and requires a pilot interface that minimizes both pilot workload and cognitive error potential. Throttle Back-drive Capability PA Approach Power Compensation (Auto-Throttle) UA Speed Hold Modes STOVL Performance Protection & Auto-Deceleration Modes Commonality Between CTOL, STOVL and CV Variants Active Stick & Throttle Had Already Been Proven on X-35 Demonstrator X-35 active throttle had a separate nozzle control lever

AIS Installation Overview SideStick (ASSCA) FWD Inceptor Control Unit (ICU) All JSF variants (CTOL, STOVL & CV) use identical AIS hardware & software. AIS is provided as a complete system by BAE, Rochester UK Stick & Throttle grips not procured as part of AIS. Throttle (ATQA)

Active Throttle (9-inch linear deflection) F-35 AA-1 Cockpit Active Side-Stick (approx. ±6 deg deflection)

Inceptor Characteristics Three Axes of Control: Stick Pitch, Stick Roll, Throttle Each Axis contains duplex 28V electric motor drives connected to grip interface by mechanical linkages Each Axis contains triplex force and position sensors Stick Axes contain mechanical springs for backup mode Grips (and various HOTAS switches) are supplied by separate vendor, but are qualified for flight together with the stick & throttle.

VMC & Inceptor Architecture ICU AIS SideStick VMC A (IEEE1394 network) Chan A (duplex motor interface) Pitch Axis VMC B Chan B Roll Axis VMC C Chan C Throttle Fore/Aft Each Vehicle Management Computer (VMC) Contains: CLAW Application which determines inceptor force gradients and other features FCRM Application to manage ICU health & failure reports and to select triplex inceptor position & forces for CLAW input Inceptor Control Unit (ICU) performs: Motor Drive Loop Closure & Control Failure Management Mode Control Initiated Built-In Test (triplex grip force & position feedbacks)

AIS Modes & Fault Accommodation Each Inceptor has three primary control modes: Active: sensed grip force is used to actively position the inceptor according to the programmed force vs. position characteristics Flight Control Laws use inceptor position as pilot command Passive: motor drives disengaged, stick springs provide fixed linear force gradient, throttle has fixed friction & no detents Used upon unrecoverable error with motor drives Flight Control Laws use stick forces and throttle position as pilot command Both stick axes will maintain like mode (if one axis downgrades passive mode, other axis will be place passive mode) Jammed: inceptor position is fixed automatically detected by software Flight Control Laws use inceptor force as pilot command jammed throttle requires some Control Law reconfiguration

Active Inceptor Requirements & Specification Issues Programmable Inceptor Active Mode Characteristics: force gradients/ramps forward & aft end stops variable damping force gates & soft-stops (e.g AB) pilot-adjustable friction force (throttle) force detents (STOVL) position back-drive (autothrottle modes) Inceptor Specification Issues: force capability (static and dynamic) force accuracy/variability velocity capability motor drive redundancy electronics redundancy force sensor null drift & sensor noise characteristics passive mode centering (stick) passive mode breakout and force gradients (stick) Blue shaded items are less configuration-dependent than others and could benefit from industry-wide specifications or guidance.

How Is Active Capability Currently Used? Throttle: Variable aft & forward end-stops (e.g. STOVL mode is different from CTOL mode) AB gate (when STOVL system is not deployed) Launch gate (CV only) STOVL center detent (zero commanded acceleration) STOVL on-ground power braking force gradient Back-drive Auto-Throttle Approach (all variants) STOVL Decel-to-Hover

How Is Active Capability Currently Used? Stick: Tailored STOVL pitch force characteristics wingborne vs. jetborne variations forward soft-stop(s) for vertical landing sink speed Pitch force feedback at higher AOA Roll force tailoring: left vs. right Roll force tailoring: CTOL vs. STOVL Increased force breakout for CV launch (pitch & roll) Pitch Stick Force Fwd CTOL STOVL - Wingborne STOVL - Jetborne Pitch Stick Deflection Aft

Background: F-35B Jetborne Control Strategy Left-Hand Inceptor (LHI) provides fore/aft acceleration control (with speed hold function on center detent) Lateral Right-Hand Inceptor (RHI) provides bank angle control to give lateral acceleration Longitudinal Right-Hand Inceptor (RHI) provides height rate control (zero force commands altitude hold) Full matrix of STOVL tasks can be flown by using only the two primary inceptors in a consistent manner throughout the flight envelope. Nozzle / thrust vector control not required in flight Cognitive error potential minimized by consistent inceptor functionality HOTAS functions can be added to provide additional hover control options

Further Advancements Using Active Inceptors: TRC Mode TRC = Translational Rate Command LHI (Throttle) Characteristics LHI Force (lbs) Lateral RHI (Stick) Characteristics RHI Force (lbs) Disengage Stop 20 Disengage Stop Disengage Stop 20 Disengage Stop Decel Cmd 10 Accel Cmd Bank Cmd 10 Bank Cmd AFT 1 LHI Displacement 1 FWD (inches) LEFT 5 4 RHI Displacement 4 5 (deg) RIGHT Velocity 10 10 Command (kts) 10 Velocity 10 Command (kts) Engage / Disengage via HOTAS Switch Velocity Trim via Speedbrake switch Disengage via Force Breakout Disengage via Paddle Switch

Potential Option for Longitudinal Stick: Height Gripper Proposed Change to Jetborne Height Axis: Pitch Stick would command altitude acceleration instead of the baseline altitude rate. releasing the stick would no longer command zero sink rate (altitude-hold), so some other means of low-workload height hold was required solution was a pilot-engageable gripper mode, in which an altitude-hold augmentation could be quickly engaged and disengaged with gripper engaged, longitudinal stick breakout force is significantly increased to prevent inadvertent disengagement Altitude Rosette is Boxed on Engagement Manual Disengage to start descent rate Pros Hover stick force is significantly higher and provides pilot direct tactile feedback and confirmation that the flight control system is in control of height axes Push through or paddle off to begin vertical landing Cons Remembering to select height hold More buttons required Boxed Altitude Engaged with S-5 switch Altitude Gripper Breakout: +/- 20 lbs -or - NWS Button

AIS Lessons Learned Level 1 flying qualities for precise STOVL tasks are possible using a small, limited-displacement stick, due to the ability to set jetborne-specific stick characteristics without compromising wingborne flying qualities. Passive and jammed modes can be accommodated with only minor flying qualities degradations throttle control in jammed mode perhaps the greatest challenge Inceptor back-drive capability can be used to provide critical insight and training to the pilot in a very intuitive manner power approach auto-throttle as a training aid STOVL auto-decel and performance deficit protection (potential) high AOA cueing

Conclusions JSF is committed to use of active inceptor system (AIS) for all three aircraft variants production-representative AIS has been flying on AA-1 aircraft since December 2006. AIS has provided a valuable level of design flexibility both for the existing vehicle control laws and for the resolution of any yet unknown flying qualities shortcomings. AIS team has been challenged by environmental requirements for force sensors, and has worked hard to ensure force feel characteristics and redundancy management meet vehicle needs.

Questions?