Passenger Rail Solar Electrification: A Primer. Oregon Department of Transportation Rail Division. June 2009

Similar documents
Contents. Solar Select TM Frequently Asked Questions

ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION No. 57 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

MassDOT Highway ROW Solar PV Energy Program. Hongyan (Lily) Oliver Massachusetts Department of Transportation Office of Transportation Planning

Household Renewable Energy

Solar Project Development in Regulated Markets. Smart and Sustainable Campuses Conference 2017

Information Packet Kissimmee Utility Authority Customer-Owned Renewable Generation Interconnection And Net Metering Program

Consumer Guidelines for Electric Power Generator Installation and Interconnection

Community Solar Projects: Glossary of Terms

Power Purchase Agreement for Commercial PV Systems

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Expanding Capacity for the Northeast Corridor The Gateway Program

Clean Transportation Program. 1. Why EVs

USDOT CMAQ Program. Southeast Diesel Collaborative Annual Conference September, 2017

Successful Passenger Rail in the State of California

PREFACE 2015 CALSTART

Charlotte Gateway Station A State & City Partnership June 24, 2015

Transportation Electrification Public Input Workshop. August 3, 2016

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Economics and Barriers to Solar Photovoltaic Applications in Barbados

New Initiatives in Distributed Energy Resources: Evolutions in EV Infrastructure

Energy Savings through Solar Energy for Municipalities

Overview LEASE AGREEMENT (PPA) One time Cost No Up-front Cost Zero or low Up-front Cost. Own the Solar System. Solar System owned by Wilkins

Assessing Streetcar Feasibility in Your Community. Rail~Volution. Thomas Brennan Nelson\Nygaard Nygaard Consulting September 9, 2005

Economic and Air Quality Benefits of Electric Vehicles in Nevada

Solar Power & Utilities: Today and Tomorrow

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Electrical District No. 3 SOLAR Q & A

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

Considering Financial Choices with Community Solar Gardens in Xcel s Territory

Alternatively Financing Energy Projects Fort Campbell s Lessons Learned

Frequently Asked Questions

SOLAR DISTRIBUTED GENERATION PROGRAM UPDATE

Electric Vehicle Charge Ready Program

Long Island Solar Installer Workshop

Considerations for Municipal Solar Projects. Ben Frevert Larsen Engineers November 16, 2016

Modernising the Great Western railway

Infrastructure planning for Electric Vehicles (EVs): How Queensland is charging ahead. Tim Harrison

best to you all Gail Carbiener Page 1 of 5

Washington State Road Usage Charge Assessment

Executive Summary. DC Fast Charging. Opportunities for Vehicle Electrification in the Denver Metro area and Across Colorado

Planning Distributed Generation for Transmission Savings 1 By Kenneth Sahm White and Stephanie Wang 2 March 19, 2014

Brownfields to Brightfields

All of Texas Has Excellent Solar Resources. United States Solar Installed (as of mid 2013): 10 GW Germany Solar Installed (end of 2013): 35.

METRO CNG Program Phase I Update. Customer Service Committee April 2014

Solar Energy Opportunities for New Schools July 10, School Board Work Session

Unlocking Private Sector Financing for Alternative Fuel Vehicles and Fueling Infrastructure

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Decision on Merced Irrigation District Transition Agreement

HONOLULU AUTHORITY FOR RAPID TRANSPORTATION CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR THE

Spring Olympic Energy Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 156 Huron, OH (360) Solar Age Participant

Economic Development Benefits of Plug-in Electric Vehicles in Massachusetts. Al Morrissey - National Grid REMI Users Conference 2017 October 25, 2017

UNION MINE DISPOSAL SITE Renewable Energy Project Feasibility and Economic Analysis

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

State Efforts to Promote Alternative Fuels. Kristy Hartman November 13, 2014

An Overview of High Speed Rail. David Randall Peterman Congressional Research Service

Powering Your Home With The Sun. Introduction to Residential Solar Energy Systems [Your Name] ISEA Solar Ambassador

The Preferred Alternative: a Vision for Growth on the Northeast Corridor

May 1, SUBJECT: Demand Forecasting and the Transportation Sector

2015 Solar Summit. Jake Wade Net Metering Program Manager

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Roma McKenzie-Campbell Amtrak, Project Manager. Caroline Ducas VHB, Senior Transit Planner. Boston, Massachusetts

Guide to Wisconsin Community Solar Welcome to Solar*Connect Community SM

GLOBAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET UPDATE: AUSTRALIAN ENERGY STORAGE ASSOCIATION

TRANSFORMING TRANSPORTATION

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

MEDIA RELEASE. June 16, 2008 For Immediate Release

WASHINGTON STATE ROAD USAGE CHARGE ASSESSMENT

U.S. System Summary: CALIFORNIA

Joint Con Edison LIPA Offshore Wind Power Integration Project Feasibility Assessment

All Electric Buses for Transit - Overview and Discussion

THE PARTNERSHIP OF RAIL & COAL MOVING AHEAD 2014 RMCMI ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 19, 2014

SOLAR FOR ALL (Rev. 5)

OTC/MANE-VU. 19 November 2014

NASEO 2015 Central Regional Meeting. Vision Fleet June 12, 2015

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

Keeping Seattle Moving Seattle City Council February 2013

Smart Ports Technology Advancements in Intermodal Transportation

Federal Gas Tax Program. Transportation Committee May 7, 2014

Solar in the Northwest. Jake Wade Net Metering Program Manager

Felix Oduyemi, Senior Program Manager, Southern California Edison

RE: Comments on Proposed Mitigation Plan for the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust

We have two modes: Complacency and Panic

Merger of the generator interconnection processes of Valley Electric and the ISO;

Solar Farms using the Tensioned Cable System (TCS) for mounting Solar PV Panels

SW Clean Transportation Project

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

ALZ Electrical Solar Consumer Guide

Producing your own energy? Great Decision. ComEd.com/Interconnection. Let s connect you to our smart grid.

Proposed Downtown Miami Link

WELCOME. What are we doing here tonight? What can you expect? How can you participate?

Bike Share: Council Briefing #2. Council Transportation Committee Scott Kubly, Nicole Freedman February 19, 2016

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Final Report. LED Streetlights Market Assessment Study

RENEWABLE ENERGY PROCUREMENT OPTIONS IN MASSACHUSETTS. Boston Green Tourism

Delaware Electric Cooperative. Solar: What You Need to Know

Update of the Midwest Regional Rail Initiative. Tim Hoeffner Michigan Department of Transportation Director, Office of Rail Lansing, MI

Contents. Executive Summary...1 Introduction...2 Operating Plan...4 System Connectivity...5

Transcription:

Passenger Rail Solar Electrification: A Primer Oregon Department of Transportation Rail Division June 2009 Betsy Imholt ODOT Rail Division 503.986.4077 phone betsy.imholt@odot.state.or.us

Executive Summary As Oregon looks to provide more reliable, frequent, and sustainable passenger rail service in the Willamette Valley, the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) is examining existing rail routes for optimal operating and energy options for future intercity passenger service. Intercity passenger service between Portland and Eugene currently runs on the Union Pacific (UP) line. Of the four routes in the Willamette Valley, it is by far the busiest with approximately 20-25 freight trains per day. However an adjacent line, the Portland & Western (PNWR) operated Oregon Electric (OE) line runs two to six freight trains per day. For this reason, the state of Oregon is investigating the opportunities and challenges of moving the intercity passenger service from the UP line to the OE line. Besides freight density, one of the issues to consider is energy use; specifically, can either line be electrified for passenger trains? Because these rail lines are privately owned and operated, it is the sole decision of the host railroad to decide if electrification is an option. Based on conversations with UP and the OE s host railroads, it is ODOT s understanding that electrification is a possibility on the OE, however the UP is not interested in electrification on their mainline. ODOT s Rail Division, consultants from Parsons Brinkerhoff, and Oregon s Department of Energy conducted a feasibility assessment of electrifying the OE line between Eugene and Southeast Portland at Willsburg Junction with traditional electric sources and solar power generated on publically owned right-of-way. The Assessment aimed to answer the following questions: What are the elements of electrification? Are the environmental conditions favorable for solar power? Can solar power provide sufficient energy to run electrified passenger trains? What are the emissions reductions? How much will it cost? The assessment determined that electrifying the OE line is technically feasible and that it is feasible to supply energy for rail operations through the installation of solar panels (known as photovoltaic or PV panels or arrays) on publically owned right-of-way. What Are the Elements of Electrification? Railroad Ownership There are three separate right-of-way owners along the OE line from Portland to Eugene: Union Pacific (UP) owns two segments including their mainline between Union Station and Willsburg Junction (6 miles) and a segment they lease to PNWR from Willsburg Junction to Tualatin (10 miles); ODOT owns the right-of-way between Tualatin to just North of Keizer (28 miles); and BNSF Railway (BNSF) owns the stretch from North of Keizer to Eugene (76 miles). The operating rights of the ODOT-owned right-of-way are owned by the PNWR. The sections owned by the BNSF and UP are leased to PNWR. While ODOT may be a willing and active agent in developing electrified rail, the UP, BNSF and PNWR must also agree in order to install infrastructure necessary to electrify. It is critical that any discussion of route electrification include representatives of these entities. It is also assumed that electrification 2

on the 6 mile UP mainline segment between Willsburg Junction to Union Station is improbable. Catenary versus Third-Rail Catenary electrification involves the construction of an overhead cable system that supplies energy to electric trains. Third rail refers to the construction of a small, ground-level rail that is placed either at the side of the existing right-of-way or in between the tracks. In general, if a train passes through a series of at-grade crossings, use of an exposed third rail is not a viable option due to safety and security reasons. There are over 250 public and private atgrade crossings on this line therefore the assessment assumed that catenary technology is the most applicable technology under current road-rail crossing conditions. Hybrid Locomotives If the OE line is electrified, trains will still need to travel on non-electric segments of the UP. Hybrid or dual-mode locomotives that can be powered by both diesel and electricity exist and are already in use in other parts of the United States. In the US, at least three dual-mode locomotive types have been built. The Long Island Rail Road and Metro-North Railroad operate dual-mode diesel-electric/third-rail locomotives between non-electrified territory and New York City, because of a local law banning dieselpowered locomotives in Manhattan tunnels. For the same reason, Amtrak operates a fleet of dual-mode locomotives in the New York area. All three (EMD FL9, P32AC-DM, and EMD DM30AC) operate using a third-rail. In the Pacific Northwest, there are no comparable rail examples, but in the Seattle area, King County/Metro transit buses that enter the downtown Seattle core are dual-mode diesel and electric buses that use overhead catenary. Dual-mode trains that rely on catenaries for power tend to be more common in Europe. For example, there are dual- mode catenary systems in France (B 81500), Spain (FEVE 1.900 Series), and Switzerland (RhB Gem 4/4). Unfortunately, since dual-mode catenary locomotives have yet to be approved for use in the United States, design and procurement costs will likely be high, as well as general project risk. Are the Environmental Conditions Favorable for Solar Power Generation? Yes. Solar power is considered a favorable option when the average annual photo-voltaic solar radiation capacity of an area is about 5.0 kwh per square meter per day. According to estimates by both the US Energy Information Agency and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, capacity is about 4.0 to 4.5 kwh per square meter per day (approximately 4.0 kwh in Portland, 4.17 kwh in Salem, and 4.13 kwh in Eugene 1 ; also the University of Oregon Solar Radiation Monitoring Laboratory monitoring reports cite an annual average of 1 PVWATTS, a solar energy calculator from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/codes_algs/pvwatts/version1/us/oregon) 3

3.8 kwh 2 ) just under the threshold. That said, because the study area so closely meets the threshold, and because the ability of solar arrays to more efficiently capture solar radiation continues to increase, it is worthwhile to continue exploring this option. Can Solar Power Provide Sufficient Energy to Run Electric Passenger Trains? Yes. To serve six round trip trains per day would require a one-two Mega Watt (MW) system every 10 miles. Each site would require between six to twelve acres of public land, located very close to the point of connection to the local utility, but not directly in the rail right-of-way. Twelve acre sites will allow for sufficient capacity for load growth for the future electric needs as train service grows. Under current net metering law, each site could not generate more than two MW. Net metering is the term used to define how the energy generated from the solar arrays would be used by the local utility company for sale and distribution then credited against the state s power bill for the energy used by the trains. What Are the Emissions Reductions? Green house gas (CO 2 ) emissions from six diesel roundtrips per day would equal 8,851 tons per year. 3 If 109 miles of the 120-mile corridor was electrified with solar power, greenhouse gas emissions would be reduced to 767 tons per year, a 91 percent reduction. How Much Will it Cost? Capital Costs One of the most significant barriers to the development and use of solar energy is the relatively high capital costs to electrify the line. General costs to electrify a rail line are estimated at $3 million per mile, or $327 million for the 109-mile line segment. 4 The additional costs to electrify with solar power is $300,000 per mile, or an additional 10 percent, bring the entire project cost to $360 million. Two different approaches could be used to finance the solar portion of the capital costs, state ownership or third party ownership. State Ownership This approach involves the state purchase and ownership of the solar arrays. Under agreements with the local utilities, power generated would be uploaded to the power grid and 2 http://solardat.uoregon.edu/pacnwsolarradiationdatabook.html 3 Average diesel locomotive CO 2 emissions is 22.38 pounds per gallon, PB. 4 Email from Rick Schmedes, PB s lead engineer on the Caltrain Electrification project, March 2009. 4

then be discounted from the state s electric bill. This option would cost $33 million for solar installation (in addition to the $327 million for electrification which would apply under either scenario). This scenario allows the state to own the arrays and the power they generate. Third Party Ownership Third party ownership allows for private companies to leverage federal tax credits and depreciation by paying for the solar power installation costs, however the state would not own the solar assets or the power they generate. This model is being used in ODOT s Solar Highway project. 5 This model would cost the state little to nothing above the initial $327 million used for electrification installation, however the state would need to purchase all electricity necessary to power the trains. Pay Back Period If service grows to six roundtrips per day, 1 million gallons of diesel and $3 million in fuel costs will be saved each year. If the state owns the solar resource, the investment for electrification and solar installation ($360 million) will be paid back by year 2050. The pay back period under the third party ownership model would be much longer even though the project costs will be less, since the purchase of electricity would be required. 5 More information on the Solar Highway at http://www.oregon.gov/odot/hwy/oipp/inn_solarhighway.shtml 5

6