Emission Rate Approach for Evaluating the Differences in Emissions Between CNG and Diesel Busses

Similar documents
MAKING USE OF MOBILE6 S CAPABILITIES FOR MODELING START EMISSIONS

CHAPTER 7: EMISSION FACTORS/MOVES MODEL

Air Quality Impacts of Advance Transit s Fixed Route Bus Service

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects

Call for Projects Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Emissions Formulas Technical Advisory Committee

PEMS International Conference & Workshop April 3, 2014

Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects

Making Use Of MOBILE6 s Capabilities For Modeling Start Emissions

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

2016 Congestion Report

Southeastern State s Experience with MOVES

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Transportation: On the Road to Cleaner Air Did you know?

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Real-world Versus Certification Emission Rates for Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

The Community of Yesteryear

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

CO 2 Emissions from Cars, Trucks & Buses in the Metropolitan Washington Region

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

Use of National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) Data in Assessment of Impacts of PHEVs on Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions and Electricity Demand

University of Vermont Transportation Research Center

Where are the Increases in Motorcycle Rider Fatalities?

U.S. System Summary: ARIZONA/SOUTHWEST

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

Reducing Cost and Emissions with Eco-Driving for Transit Vehicles Yanzhi Ann Xu Hanyan Ann Li Haobing Liu Michael O. Rodgers Randall Guensler

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

IAPH Tool Box for Port Clean Air Programs

Data Needs for Updating and Improving the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency NONROAD Model February 18, 2019

San Joaquin Valley APCD

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

TOLL TRUCKWAYS: Increasing Productivity and Safety in Goods Movement. By Robert W. Poole, Jr., and Peter Samuel

School Buses, Air Pollution & Children s Health

Benefits of greener trucks and buses

APPLICATION OF A PARCEL-BASED SUSTAINABILITY TOOL TO ANALYZE GHG EMISSIONS

Daejin Kim Shavi Tolan Yongzheng Zhang. Comparison between shale gas and Camelina biodiesel

Energy Technical Memorandum

METRO Light Rail Update

TECHNICAL NOTE Transportation Air Quality Technical Support Interagency Contract with Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission

Diesel Vehicle Regulation Overview. Eloy Florez, Air Pollution Specialist In Use Control Measures Air Resources Board

ON-ROAD HEAVY-DUTY TRUCK APPLICATION

Volkswagen Group of America Virginia Energy Conference Session 30: Fossil Fuels Diesel Developments Presented by Stuart Johnson, Engineering and

School Buses, Air Pollution & Children s Health: Improving Children s Health & Local Air Quality by Reducing School Bus Emissions

Appendix 17. Pre-Analysis Consensus Template

Calstart Ontario Diesel Vehicle Regulation Overview

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

4 th IRTAD CONFERENCE Road safety data: collection and analysis for target setting and monitoring performances and progress

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017

Truck Drayage Metrics

Transportation Data in Southeast Michigan

The Value of Travel-Time: Estimates of the Hourly Value of Time for Vehicles in Oregon 2007

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

Port of South Louisiana. Benefit Cost Analysis. Globalplex Intermodal Efficiency Improvements Project

La Canada Flintridge Parents for Healthy Air November 1, 2018 Presented by Elizabeth Krider, Ph.D., Esther Kornfeld and Tamar Tujian

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Measuring and Modeling Vehicle Emissions: Methodology and Applications

H. Christopher Frey, a Nagui M. Rouphail, a,b Haibo Zhai a,c. Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering b

BCA Benefits and Assumptions Summary

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Heavy Duty Trucks: Understanding Key Trends,

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Mobile Source Air Toxics: Overview and Regulatory Background

THE MOVES TRANSITION MADE EASY THE TDOT WAY. Introduction TDOT s Proposal Work Completed In Progress What s HOT Questions?

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

An Asset Management Plan for Transit And Access Transit Fleet

Transcription:

Emission Rate Approach for Evaluating the Differences in Emissions Between CNG and Diesel Busses By Joon H. Byun, Ph.D. Air Quality Modeling Specialist Federal Highway Administration

Background Information (MOBILE vs. MOVES)

MOBILE6.2 Modeling Approaches HC Curve Source: Tianjia Tang, Ph.D., FHWA

MOBILE6.2 Modeling Approaches NOx Curve Source: Tianjia Tang, Ph.D., FHWA

MOBILE6.2 Modeling Approaches CO Curve Source: Tianjia Tang, Ph.D., FHWA

How About Start & Evaporative Emissions? Grams per VMT (Vehicle Miles Traveled) Grams per engine starts Default: combination of both (g/mile) Higher the VMT, higher the start & evaporative emissions

MOVES Modeling Approaches (Emission Processes) Running Start Evaporative Processes Crankcase Tire Wear Brake Wear Extended Idle Life Cycle Processes 7

0.25 Weekday Passenger Car HC Emissions MOVES Projection - Salt Lake County, July 2020 0.2 0.15 Evaporative Processes Tons 0.1 Start Exhaust 0.05 0 Running Exhaust 1 AM 3 AM 5 AM 7 AM 9 AM 11 AM 1 PM 3 PM 5 PM 7 PM 9 PM 11 PM Source: John Koupal, EPA 8

MOVES Modeling Approaches (Start and Running Emissions) Bin Emission Rate Start Emissions based on Soak Time Cold Start Running 505 505 Running Emissions based on Speed & VSP Time in Seconds

MOVES Modeling Approaches (Evaporative Emissions) Source: US EPA 10

Emission Processes and Mobile Source Activities

Emission Processes vs. Rates (MOVES vs. MOBILE6) Emission Processes MOVES MOBILE6 Rates/Distance Rates/Vehicle Rates/Profile Rates/Distance Running Exhaust Grams/Mile Grams/Mile Start Exhaust Grams/Vehicle Grams/Mile Evap Permeation Grams/Mile Grams/Vehicle Grams/Mile Evap Fuel Vapor Venting Grams/Mile Grams/Vehicle Grams/Mile Evap Fuel Leaks Grams/Mile Grams/Vehicle Grams/Mile Crankcase Running Exhaust Grams/Mile Grams/Mile Crankcase Start Exhaust Grams/Vehicle NA Crankcase Extended Idle Exhaust NA Refueling Displacement Vapor Loss Grams/Mile Extended Idle Exhaust Grams/Vehicle Included in the HDDV8b Class 12

Running Emissions Grams/Mile by Temperature

Running Emissions (County Data Manager) Facility based drive schedules (cycles) Urban Freeway, Urban Non-freeway, Rural Freeway, Rural Non-freeway Emission rates option grams/mile by temp Reason to believe that the drive schedules of your projects are significantly different from the MOVES default schedules, Project Level Analyses are required 14

MOVES Drive Schedules 15

Modeling Area

Start Emissions Grams/Vehicle by Hours

Start Emissions Engine Starts per day per vehicle (autos & trucks) MOBILE6 Baltimore, Spokane & Atlanta MOVES Baltimore, Spokane, Atlanta, Minneapolis, Knoxville & Las Vegas Engine Temperatures Soak Distribution Differs by hour 18

Start per Day by Vehicle Types (MOVES vs. MOBILE6) 19

Operating-Mode Definitions for Start Exhaust Emissions 20

Number of Vehicle Starts No seasonal variations Default number of starts per vehicle Check with local data Alternative source of data

Number of Engine Starts per Day (Local Sources of Data) TDF model O/D trip table Provides approximate number of engine starts Seasonal variation Reflective to: annual growth, transportation projects/policies etc. Number of auto trips per day < number of engine starts per day Provides good information where starts are located O/D trip table approach may provide better local number of engine starts than the MOVES model defaults Regionally non-significant projects can not be modeled through TDF model. Use project level analysis methodologies 22

On Road Vehicle Equipment

Caution When transit buses are selected, default database allocates some VMT to Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) transit buses Therefore, users should either select the CNG transit bus combination; or Edit the AVFT input (covered in later session) so that no VMT is allocated to CNG buses. If one of these approaches is not used, some VMT assigned to buses (HPMS class 40) will be lost

MOVES Strategies Option (AVFT, Retrofit, ROP)

County Data Manager

National Trend on Vehicle Age (BTS Data) In 2007 the median age for automobiles was 9.2 years, a significant increase over 1990 (6.5 years) As SUVs are part of a relatively new consumer trend originating mostly in the 1990s, SUVs had the lowest mean age of any body style (6.1 years in 2007). Between 2007 to 2008 alone, the median age of passenger cars increased to 9.4 years, and that the median age for light trucks increased from 7.1 years in 2007 to 7.5 years in 2008 (RL Polk, March 2009)

NOx Emission Rates for Passenger Vehicles (MOVES vs. MOBILE6) 1.8 1.6 Passenger Cars MOVES Passenger Cars MOBILE6 1.4 Emission Rates (grams/mile) 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Average Speed Bin (MPH) Source: Madhusudhan Venugopal, North Central Texas Council of Governments 28

VOC Emission Rates for Passenger Vehicles (MOVES Vs MOBILE6) 0.9 0.8 Passenger Cars MOVES Passenger Cars MOBILE6 0.7 Emission Rates (grams/mile) 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Average Speed Bin (MPH) Source: Madhusudhan Venugopal, North Central Texas Council of Governments 29

Evaporate Emissions Only for HC Grams/Profile

Modeling Emissions CNG vs. Diesel Buses

Replace old technology vehicles with new technology vehicles: Often this is a replacement of urban diesel buses with cleaner fuel vehicles such as CNG buses.

Add new CNG Vehicles 1) Determine the daily bus service frequency (F: one-way) and route length (L) 2) Run MOVES by using Alternative Fuel Option initiating with base (before) conditions: no CNG Buses 3) Run MOVES by using Alternative Fuel Option initiating with after conditions: with CNG Buses Conventional bus emission factor = CBEF in grams/mile CNG bus emission factor = CNGBEF Emission benefits = F x L x (CBEF-CNGBEF)

Add new CNG Vehicles 1) Determine the daily bus service frequency (F: one-way) and route length (L) 2) Allocate F into hourly bases: f 3) Allocate L into hourly bases: l 4) Run MOVES by using Alternative Fuel Option initiating with base (before) conditions: no CNG Buses 5) Run MOVES by using Alternative Fuel Option initiating with after conditions: with CNG Buses Conventional Bus Emission factor = CBEF in grams/mile CNG bus emission factor = CNGBEF Daily Running Emission benefits = f x l x (CBEF-CNGBEF) How about start emissions?