Utility Consumer Issues

Similar documents
SDG&E Customer Distributed Generation Programs. Steve Jaffe Senior Market Advisor Customer Innovations Group September 14, 2009

2017 Colorado Phase 2 Regulatory Rate Review Frequently asked questions

Powering Your Home With The Sun. Introduction to Residential Solar Energy Systems [Your Name] ISEA Solar Ambassador

Agenda. Industry Rate Trends Summary of Financial Targets Cost of Service Information. Valuation of Solar

Net Metering in Missouri

Introduction to Cost of Service Studies and Rate Design

KANSAS CITY POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY P.S.C. MO. No. 7 Fourth Revised Sheet No. 39 Canceling P.S.C. MO. No. 7 Third Revised Sheet No.

Distributed Generation and the Importance of the Electric Power Grid

Making electricity billing fair

Technical Conference: Alternative Utility Cost Recovery Mechanisms

Demand Charges to Deal With Net Energy Metering: Key Considerations

THE COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS RESOLUTION SUPPORTING ELECTRIC POWER GRID MODERNIZATION TO ACHIEVE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND DEMAND REDUCTION BENEFITS

Commissioner Anne E. Hoskins iiesi Workshop Copenhagen, Denmark May, 2014

Designing retail electricity tariffs for a successful Energy Union

Designing Distributed Generation Tariffs Well

Keys to delivering solar power at competitive prices

Implementing Net Metering to Meet Policy Objectives

Solar Policy Landscape West. Andy Newbold, Public Affairs Manager January 2018

216B.164 COGENERATION AND SMALL POWER PRODUCTION.

Vermont s Delivery of Energy Efficiency Part I: Electric Utilities

Basic tariff guiding principles

Ratemaking Trends in the Utility Industry. Jeff Wernert The Prime Group, LLC

Electric Rate Design Introductory Principles Residential Rate Design

History and Principles of Rate Regulation

Glossary of Community Choice Energy and Related Terms

Utility Rate Design for Solar PV Customers

Illinois Renewable Energy Portfolio Net Metering Grid Interconnection Requirements Financing Options

Cost of Service and Rates. Marty Blake The Prime Group, LLC

Electric Rate Action Proposal. February 2017

Electrical District No. 3 SOLAR Q & A

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

Summer Reliability Assessment Report Electric Distribution Companies Perspective

D.P.U A Appendix B 220 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

Tariff Design Issues: Approaches for Recovering Grid and System Costs

Smart Meter Cost Recovery

Village of West Dundee Electric Aggregation Program

Analysis of Impact of Mass Implementation of DER. Richard Fowler Adam Toth, PE Jeff Mueller, PE

Beyond Net Metering Issues for Washington State

Considerations for Interconnecting with Renewable Generators

SEPA Grid Evolution Summit: Rethinking Rate Design

Smarting From Resistance to Smart Grids

Electric Rate Design as Though the Future Matters

Decoupling in Massachusetts September 28, Geoff Lubbock Vice President, Financial Strategic Planning & Policy

MYPD3 tariff restructuring plan use-of-system charges. Brochure

Reforming the TAC and Retail Transmission Rates. Robert Levin California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division August 29, 2017

Net Metering in Illinois. Eric P. Schlaf Senior Economic Analyst Illinois Commerce Commission January 31, 2014

Illinois Solar Energy Association. Residential Rate Design Webinar August 25, 2016

New Jersey Solar Roundtable

Resident Utility Allowance Program Update. Davis-Monthan Air Force Base 22 June 2016

Smart Rate Design for a Smart Future

Community Shared Solar Opportunities in Massachusetts Emma Krause Rooftop Solar Challenge Coordinator MA DOER

FITCHBURG GAS AND ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY NET METERING SCHEDULE NM

NAVIGANT RESEARCH INTRODUCTION

Methodology of Cost Allocation

Residential Rate Design and Electric Vehicles

Utility Solar Business Models

Community Choice Aggregation A Tool for Municipalities

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

MCE Napa County Cleaner energy and lower rates. Honig Winery, Rutherford

S T A F F R E P O R T

Economics of Integrating Renewables DAN HARMS MANAGER OF RATE, TECHNOLOGY & ENERGY POLICY SEPTEMBER 2017

Michigan Renewable Energy Case Study

The Gambia National Forum on

Electricity Rates. effective May 1, For residential customers

SMART Program: Ensuring Expanded Access for Low-Income Ratepayers and Communities Updated May 11, 2017

Community Solar Frequently Asked Questions. Q: Whom do I talk to about becoming a subscriber or my active subscription?

FITCHBURG GAS AND ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY NET METERING SCHEDULE NM

Distributed Solar Policy Case Study: NEVADA

Robertson County. 3 utilities: Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Fleming-Mason Energy Cooperative Kentucky Utilities DID YOU KNOW?

ELG 4126 DGD Sustainable Electrical Power Systems

Community Solar Projects: Glossary of Terms

Energy efficiency policy - an innovation-based policy of the state and civil society

(2) Scope. 220 CMR applies to all Distribution Companies subject to the jurisdiction of the Department.

Net Metering and Solar Incentive Proposed Framework

Utility Community Solar: Program Development & Implementation

Village of Mount Prospect Electric Aggregation Program

Missouri Public Service Commission 101. Missouri Public Service Commission Jefferson City, MO

Power Purchase Agreement for Commercial PV Systems

Energy Affordability

N ational Economic Trends

Johnson County. 2 utilities: Big Sandy RECC Kentucky Power DID YOU KNOW? Residential Rate Comparison. Electric Service Areas

Residential PV-the City of Cape Town s experience Brian Jones Head: Green Energy/Electricity Services City of Cape Town South Africa

GONE TOO FAR: SOARING HYDRO BILLS OFFSET CONSERVATION EFFORTS AND HURT CONSERVERS MOST

What, Why, and Where? Brian Lips Senior Project Manager for Policy NC Clean Energy Technology Center

SOLAR DISTRIBUTED GENERATION PROGRAM UPDATE

Net Metering Policy Framework. July 2015

Submission on the Electricity ( Disconnections and Low Fixed Charges) Amendment Bill

October Subject: Westar got their wish: KCC rules to punish small rooftop solar but subsidize wealthy residential customers.

STATE OF MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Beverly Jones Heydinger

Ketchum Energy Advisory Committee Annual Update and Recommendation for Electric Vehicle Charging Station

William Dornbos, Senior Attorney and Director, Connecticut Office, x202,

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL

Future Funding The sustainability of current transport revenue tools model and report November 2014

Cost of Service Study and Rate Analysis. for. City of Lebanon, Missouri. Electric Department

Pueblo City Council Work Session February 8, :30 pm Susan Perkins, David Cockrell and Anne Stattelman

The Future of Energy Delivery: The Ongoing Grid Transformation

CUSTOMER OWNED SOLAR IN WISCONSIN

Community Solar Workshop & Fair. Woodbury

Senate Standing Committees on Economics 27 June 2014 PO Box 6100 Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 By

Self-Consumption and Net Balancing: Issues and solutions

Transcription:

Utility Consumer Issues City of Independence, Missouri September 12, 2015 -John B. Coffman AARP Energy Utility Consultant

Who is AARP? AARP is a non partisan, non profit, social change organization with a membership that helps people 50+ have independence, choice, and control in ways that are beneficial and affordable to them and society as a whole. AARP has over 748,000 members in the state of Missouri.

AARP is an advocate for the rights of people 50 and older, a great many of whom live on a fixed or limited income. A major priority of AARP is to protect consumers from unaffordable expenses for essential energy services. AARP fights for fair and affordable utility rates.

Some AARP Utility Consumer Priorities This year, AARP s multi-state utility work has included: Promoting transparency and accountability in utility ratemaking methodologies, Opposition increases in utility customer charges, Opposition to extra surcharges and riders, Opposition to various new trackers for costs currently recovered in base rates, Opposition to consumers being forced to pre-pay for large power plant projects which are not yet providing service (Construction Work In Progress). Advocating against teaser rates in restructured states, Opposing ratepayer bailouts for deregulated merchant power plants (OH; IL). Advocating that all electric grid users pay their fair share of costs.

Why are Utilities Rates Regulated? Electric, Natural Gas distribution, Sewer and Water services are natural monopolies, providing an essential service. Thus these services are either provided by: investor-owned private companies and have their rates set by the Missouri Public Service Commission, or by elected bodies, such as a Municipal City Council or an Electric Cooperative Board Transportation services and Telecommunication services were formerly considered natural monopolies, but are now largely deregulated as to price. 22 states, such as Illinois, have deregulated the generation of electricity ( restructured ), but not Missouri.

Missouri Public Service Commission (MoPSC) Since 1913, this administrative agency regulates for-profit investor-owned utilities, setting rates for electric, natural gas, water and sewer companies, including: Ameren Missouri (Union Electric Company) Laclede Gas Company (including MGE) KCPL (including KCPL-GMO) Empire District Electric Company Missouri-American Water Company Does not regulate electric coops or municipal utilities, such as: Metropolitan Sewer District of St. Louis (MSD) City Utilities of Springfield Independence Missouri Power & Light With these entities, consumers rely primarily upon their elected officials for rate protection.

Typical Utility Rate Design Customer Charge fixed part of your monthly bill ($4.00-10.00) Includes the cost of meters and the administrative cost of billing and collecting revenue from a customer. These costs do not change with customer demand or energy usage. Including distribution system operations and maintenance costs in this component is controversial. Commodity Charge variable part of your monthly bill, which will vary with usage. Sometimes there will be a seasonal differential -- higher charges in the higher demand months (summer). Surcharges i.e., Fuel Adjustment Charge (FAC) for electric utilities / Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) for natural gas Infrastructure surcharges Renewable Energy and/or Energy Efficiency trackers. The implementation and design of these mechanisms are controversial, due to the mismatch of financial factors and incentives/disincentives created.

Why High Customer Charges are Bad Public Policy 1. Impact on vulnerable customers: Seniors use less than the average: Homes with a head of household 65 years old and older use 85% of the energy consumed by the average household. A large majority of low-income consumers are small users. Small users overall tend to carry a higher energy burden than the average customer.

Energy Spending by Income National Gas Ele ctr icity All Consumers 359 1,388 Less than $5,000 180 825 $5,000 to $9,999 178 902 $10,000 to $14,999 204 954 $15,000 to $19,999 243 1,101 $20,000 to $29,999 261 1,192 $30,000 to $39,999 305 1,295 $40,000 to $49,999 351 1,367 $50,000 to $69,999 344 1,417 $70,000 a nd mor e 518 1,749 $70,000 to $79,999 421 1,538 $80,000 to $99,999 435 1,580 $100,000 a nd mor e 586 1,891 $100000 to $119,999 491 1,722 $120,000 to $149,999 553 1,787 $150,000 and m or e 685 2,103

Why High Customer Charges are Bad Public Policy? 2. Discourages Conservation!

Why High Customer Charges are Bad Public Policy? 2. Discourages Conservation: The correspondingly lower usage charges result in less financial incentive to conserve or to pursue energy efficiency measures; The economic reward for trying to save is minimized.

Why High Customer Charges are Bad Public Policy? 2. Discourages Conservation: Lower usage charges result in less financial incentive to conserve or to pursue energy efficiency measures; the economic reward for these efforts are minimized. Numerous stories regarding the sacrifices that small users makes in an attempt to reduce the size of their household energy bills.

A high customer charge minimizes the financial reward for trying to control your own utility bill!

What are the Excuses Claimed for High Customer Charges?

What are the Excuses Claimed for High Customer Charges? The Customer Charge should include all of the utility s fixed costs. ( Straight-Fixed Variable or SFV Rate Design)

What are the Excuses Claimed for High Customer Charges? The Customer Charge should include ALL of the utility s fixed costs. ( Straight-Fixed Variable or SFV Rate Design) An economic theory.... that simply begs the question, What exactly are the utility s fixed costs? A controversial inquiry involving allocation of certain costs by customer counts versus usage. Distribution costs actually vary based upon the amount of usage and demand for energy.

What are the Excuses Claimed for High Customer Charges? The Customer Charge should include ALL of the utility s fixed costs. ( Straight-Fixed Variable or SFV Rate Design) An economic theory.... that simply begs the question, What exactly are the utility s fixed costs? (A controversial inquiry involving allocation of certain costs by customer counts versus usage.) Distributed Generation (DG), Net Metering, and new Rooftop Solar is adding extra cost for simply being hooked up to electric grid.

What are the Excuses Claimed for High Customer Charges? The Customer Charge should include ALL of the utility s fixed costs. ( Straight-Fixed Variable or SFV Rate Design) An economic theory.... that simply begs the question, What exactly are the utility s fixed costs? (A controversial inquiry involving allocation of certain costs by customer counts versus usage.) Distributed Generation (DG), Net Metering, and Rooftop Solar is adding extra cost for simply being hooked up to electric grid. If customer-owned solar energy is the problem, why should all small users be punished? Fix the DG or solar connection charge issues instead.

Other Questions regarding the Sawvel and Associates, Inc. 2014-2015 Electric Cost of Service and Rate Design Study : Length of the Plan: Is five years too long of a period to lock in energy rate increases? Customer Class Shifts: Is it fair for residential homeowners have their electric bills increased by 0.5% in order to decrease electric bills for large commercial customers, i.e., large general service customers (-6.6%) and large power customers (-8.4%).

Other Questions (cont.) Unrestricted Funds: Is there enough transparency and accountability for these funds? Is there a danger of funds being diverted to non-utility purposes? Is $23-25 million still too high? Is it necessary to create New Surcharges for piecemeal purposes? (i.e., new proposed Regulatory and Environmental Compliance Rider Schedule REC-1)

John B. Coffman How to Reach Me: (573) 424-6779 john@johncoffman.net