Attachment C: Benefit-Cost Analysis Spreadsheet

Similar documents
State Highway 32 East TIGER Discretionary Grant Application APPENDIX C - BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS REPORT

Bella Vista Bypass Benefit Cost Analysis

US 377 Relief Route Appendix C: Benefit Cost Analysis

City of Pacific Grove

Benefit Cost Analysis

New Buck O Neil (U. S. 169) Crossing Benefit-Cost Analysis. Kansas City, Missouri

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Port of South Louisiana. Benefit Cost Analysis. Globalplex Intermodal Efficiency Improvements Project

Benefit-Cost Analysis Technical Memo

US 69/75 Controlled Access Highway and Grade Separations Benefit-Cost Analysis Narrative

Benefit-Cost Analysis

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Benefit-Cost Analysis

BCA Benefits and Assumptions Summary

Clearing the Air in West Oakland: Port Impacts, Freight Transport & Environmental Justice

Air Quality Impacts of Advance Transit s Fixed Route Bus Service

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

U.S. 81 Realignment Around Chickasha, Oklahoma Benefit-Cost Analysis Narrative

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

City of Marina. Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: Transportation Agency for Monterey County

Why is a towboat called a towboat when it pushes the barges?

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

Benefit-Cost Analysis

TIGER VI Discretionary Grant Program. Project Name: Highway 67 Interchange

The Value of Travel-Time: Estimates of the Hourly Value of Time for Vehicles in Oregon 2007

Is The Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project the answer?

Appendix A: Executive Summary of the Benefit-Cost Analysis for Glacier Rail Park/Kalispell Core Area Development and Trail Project Table of Contents

Project Appraisal Guidelines for National Roads Unit National Parameters Values Sheet

ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Task Force Meeting January 15, 2009

Where are the Increases in Motorcycle Rider Fatalities?

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 INTRODUCTION...3 PROJECTED FUTURE GROWTH...3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...4 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES...

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

16 th Street Multimodal Corridor TIGER FY 2014 Benefit-Cost Analysis

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Summit County Greenhouse Gas Emissions Summary, 2017

La Canada Flintridge Parents for Healthy Air November 1, 2018 Presented by Elizabeth Krider, Ph.D., Esther Kornfeld and Tamar Tujian

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

SOUTH TERMINAL MODERIZATION PROJECT Total Project Cost (in Millions) Construction Total. Total Construction $ %

Electric Vehicles: Opportunities and Challenges

Art Griffith, Capital Projects Manager, ,

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

Unified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

Enhancing School Bus Safety and Pupil Transportation Safety

RIETI BBL Seminar Handout

Executive Summary. DC Fast Charging. Opportunities for Vehicle Electrification in the Denver Metro area and Across Colorado

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

Transportation Sustainability Program

Ministry of Environment and Forests. Ministry of Communication

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways.

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

TPA Steering Committee for Tri-Rail Extension to Northern Palm Beach County. February 26, 2018

Benefit-Cost Analysis of Curve Safety Treatments. Bryan Wilson, Brad Brimley Texas A&M Transportation Institute

JTA S MOBILITY CORRIDORS. Improving System Performance Through Urban Design

TIGER Benefit Cost Analysis: 22 Fillmore Transit Priority Project

Click to edit Master title style

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway

USDOT CMAQ Program. Southeast Diesel Collaborative Annual Conference September, 2017

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

2010 Motorcycle Risk Study Update

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Major Widening/New Roadway

F:\PROJ\ \dwg\Alt-bridge-alignments.dwg, 17-2, 11/12/ :22:17 PM, saamhu, Acrobat PDFWriter

BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS OF RANDOLPH ROAD: HIGHWAY 87 TO VAIL ROAD TIGER II GRANT APPLICATION

SRF No MEMORANDUM

EPA and NHTSA: The New Auto Greenhouse Gas and CAFE Standards

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

FINAL REPORT FORM 1 (Formerly titled Project Monitoring Form 1 - Ridesharing ) Total Project Cost: $

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

Red Line/Healthline Extension Major Transportation Improvement Analysis Tier 2 Detailed Alternatives Screening Report

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

ATTACHMENT C.1 EXXONMOBIL INTERIM TRUCKING FOR SYU PHASED RESTART AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS

TRANSIT DRIVES PENNSYLVANIA MOBILITY FACT SHEET

CALIFORNIA MOTOR VEHICLE STOCK, TRAVEL AND FUEL FORECAST

ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

The Quality. Link. Florida School District Transportation Profiles. Volume

AusRAP assessment of Peak Downs Highway 2013

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Study Results Review For BPU EV Working Group January 21, 2018

Stakeholders Advisory Working Groups (SAWGs) Traffic and Transit SAWG Meeting #7

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

I-405 Corridor Master Plan

Rates of Motor Vehicle Crashes, Injuries, and Deaths in Relation to Driver Age, United States,

7 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

TOLL TRUCKWAYS: Increasing Productivity and Safety in Goods Movement. By Robert W. Poole, Jr., and Peter Samuel

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Minnesota Highway Cost Allocation Study

Effectiveness of Median Cable Barriers and Rumble Strips

Transcription:

Attachment C: Benefit-Cost Analysis Spreadsheet TIGER VII Application Collier Blvd. Corridor Improvements June 5 th, 2015

Collier Blvd BCA Summary The Collier Boulevard Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) has been developed using the TIGER BCA Guidance 1 and the TIGER BCA Resource Guide 2. The Collier Boulevard Corridor Improvements Project will cost $33.4m (2015 dollars), of which $26.72m or 80% is being requested as a TIGER grant with the remainder being provided through Collier County public funds. The following economic benefits of the project have been estimated: Reduced delays (travel time) due to the improved road layout A reduction in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) through encouraging more cycling and walking trips, leading to: o Reduced vehicle operating costs o Reduced highway maintenance expenditure o Reduced vehicle emissions o Reduced healthcare costs Benefits from reducing the number of pedestrian and bicycle crashes along Collier Boulevard due to the project providing improved sidewalk and cycle routes. In addition, by replacing a structurally deficient bridge over the Main Golden Gate Canal, the project will improve the state of good repair and reduce future maintenance costs, although this has not been quantified as part of the BCA. In agreement with TIGER applications guidance we have converted prices to 2013 $ values and calculated present values using a discount rate of 3% because the funds would otherwise be used for public expenditures. The project has been appraised over a 20 year period following the end of construction. The table below summarizes the benefits and costs of the project over the appraisal period. The project delivers an NPV of $1.0m. Time savings ($2013) $27,896,806 Vehicle operating cost savings ($2013) $4,440,874 Highway maintenance savings ($2013) $796,446 Safety benefits ($2013) $16,676,864 Emissions excluding CO2 ($2013) $73,494 Healthcare benefits ($2013) $1,209,230 Capital costs ($2013) ($32,392,368) Operating and maintenance costs ($2013) ($3,239,237) Undiscounted net benefits ($2013) $15,462,109 Discounted net benefits (NPV, 3%) $910,834 CO2 emissions benefits (NPV, 3%) $84,301 3% NPV total benefits $995,135 1 http://www.dot.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/tiger%20bca%20guidance%202014.pdf 2 http://www.dot.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/tiger%20bca%20resource%20guide%202014.pdf

Over the 20 year appraisal period, the project will take 5m vehicle miles off the road, resulting in the avoidance of nearly 2,000 tons of CO2 from vehicle emissions. Capital Costs The capital cost for the project is $33.4m expressed in 2015 dollars and disaggregated as shown in the table below. TIGER grant contribution of 80% or $26.72m is being sought with the remaining 20% or $6.68m being provided by Collier County. It is assumed for the purpose of the BCA that the capital costs are incurred equally in 2017 and 2018, with construction complete in 2019. Operating and Maintenance Costs The additional infrastructure being introduced as part of the project will incur an incremental operating and maintenance cost compared with the No Build alternative. This is assumed to be 0.5% of the capital expenditure. Note that whilst the project introduces additional infrastructure, it is replacing an old bridge which will lower the future maintenance costs compared with the No Build. Time saving benefits Time savings have been estimated as follows. The 2014 all day traffic volumes (ADT) for the project area have been assumed to grow at the average growth rate of the previous 4 years, i.e. 2.3% per year. The signalized delay for the build and no build scenarios has been estimated using two different methods and the average of the two methods gives the average delay saving for a given year between build and no build. These savings are converted into a total daily saving using a time of day profile. The value of this time saving is estimated using the recommended monetized values in the TIGER BCA Resource Guide, assuming a split of 95.2% autos and 4.8% trucks based on vehicle classification counts on Collier Boulevard, and an average vehicle occupancy of 1.285 estimated by comparing the number of registered vehicles to the total population in Collier County. Safety benefits

The proposed project assumed to remove all pedestrian and bicycle crashes along Collier Boulevard between Golden Gate Canal and Green Boulevard. Crash data from 2000 to 2015 3 has been analyzed to estimate an average number of pedestrian and cycle crashes per year along this segment of the route, as shown in the table below. Collier Boulevard Bicycle Pedestrian 2000 0 0 2001 0 1 2002 0 0 2003 0 1 2004 1 1 2005 0 0 2006 2 0 2007 1 1 2008 2 1 2009 1 0 2010 0 0 2011 0 1 2012 0 1 2013 1 0 2014 1 1 2015 0 0 Total 9 8 Avg. per year 0.6 0.5 Analysis of historical crashes 4 provides a likelihood of a fatality or an injury per crash. 3 http://www.colliergov.net/index.aspx?page=580 4 http://www.colliermpo.com/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=5389

Collier County average Number Proportion Pedestrian Killed 6 6% Injured 88 94% Bicycle Killed 2 2% Injured 94 98% It is assumed that non-reported crashes do not cause any injuries, this may understate the safety benefits. The number of crashes is assumed to increase in line with overall growth in ADT. Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled The reduction in VMT drives benefits in terms of vehicle operating costs, highways maintenance costs, emissions and healthcare costs. A reduction in VMT has been assumed based on 1% of trips along Collier Boulevard between Golden Gate Canal and Green Boulevard being replaced by equivalent walk or cycle trips of an average 2 mile length. Vehicle Operating Costs A reduction in vehicle operating costs of $0.59 per VMT has been assumed based on the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (Cost of Owning and Operating an Automobile, 2011) 5. This is assumed to appreciate at 2.12% per annum. Highway Maintenance Highway maintenance costs will also be reduced as a result of a reduction in VMT. A rate of $0.15 per VMT saved has been applied 6. Emissions Emissions benefits occur as a result of the reduction in VMT. The following emissions rates have been used, sourced from the Average annual Emissions and Fuel Consumption for Gasoline-Fuelled Passenger Cars and Light Trucks 7 : Carbon dioxide 369g/VMT Hydrocarbons (Volatile Organic Compounds) 1.36g/VMT Particulate Matter PM10 0.0052g/VMT, PM2.5 0.0049g/VMT Nitrous Oxides 0.95g/VMT Economic costs associated with these emissions have been valued using the TIGER BCA Resource Guide. Health benefits 5 http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table _03_17.html 6 Development of a Pavement Maintenance Cost Allocation Model, Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Davis. 7 EPA Report 420-F-05-022

The reduction in VMT will lead to an increase in the number of walking and cycle trips, thereby leading to health benefits. In Florida, the physical inactivity rate is 25.4% 8. A healthcare cost saving of $585.97 per year has been assumed 9 and for every 1,000 trips removed from the road it is assumed that 254 of them will involve people who are physically inactive, thereby providing a cost saving. 8 State Indicator Report on Physical Activity, 2010 9 Relationship of Body Mass Index and Physical Activity to Health Care Costs Among Employees; Guidelines for Analysis of investments in Bicycle Facilities (NCHRP Report 552, Transportation Research Board, 2006)

Results The table below summarizes the BCA results by year. Highways Project Calendar Vehicle Affected drivers TIME BENEFIT VMT Reduction TIME BENEFIT Maintenanc Safety Benefit Emission Net Benefits Undiscounted Healthcare Operational and Undiscounted NPV CO2 costs 3% NPV Total Capital Cost Discounted CO2 costs @ Year Year Operating Cost (excl CO2) Benefits Maintenance Cost Net Benefits @ 3% Avg SCC Benefits e @3% 3% Avg SCC (return trips per day) (person-hours/yr) (miles per yr) $ Per Year $ Per Year $ Per Year $ Per Year $ Per Year $ Per Year $ Per Year $ Per Year (excl CO2) (excl CO2) $ Per Year $ Per Year 0 2017 16,196,184-16,196,184-16,196,184-16,196,184 1 2018 16,196,184-16,196,184-15,724,450-15,724,450 2 2019 28,886 42,620 215,991 586,016 144,953 32,399 600,875 2,990 49,190 161,962 1,254,460 1,182,449 4,065 3,831 1,186,281 3 2020 29,583 48,662 221,201 669,864 151,596 33,180 622,629 3,062 50,377 161,962 1,368,746 1,252,596 4,244 3,884 1,256,481 4 2021 30,280 54,705 226,410 753,912 158,456 33,962 644,813 3,134 51,563 161,962 1,483,877 1,318,406 4,344 3,860 1,322,266 5 2022 30,976 60,748 231,620 838,163 165,538 34,743 667,433 3,206 52,750 161,962 1,599,872 1,380,063 4,615 3,981 1,384,044 6 2023 31,673 66,790 236,829 922,621 172,850 35,524 690,498 3,278 53,936 161,962 1,716,746 1,437,747 4,806 4,025 1,441,773 7 2024 32,370 72,833 242,039 1,007,288 180,397 36,306 714,014 3,350 55,122 161,962 1,834,517 1,491,630 5,001 4,067 1,495,697 8 2025 33,066 78,876 247,248 1,092,170 188,187 37,087 737,989 3,422 56,309 161,962 1,953,203 1,541,876 5,200 4,105 1,545,982 9 2026 33,763 84,918 252,458 1,177,269 196,226 37,869 762,431 3,494 57,495 161,962 2,072,822 1,588,646 5,403 4,141 1,592,787 10 2027 34,460 90,961 257,668 1,262,590 204,521 38,650 787,346 3,567 58,682 161,962 2,193,393 1,632,091 5,705 4,245 1,636,336 11 2028 35,157 97,004 262,877 1,348,136 213,079 39,432 812,743 3,639 59,868 161,962 2,314,935 1,672,358 5,917 4,275 1,676,633 12 2029 35,853 103,046 268,087 1,433,911 221,909 40,213 838,630 3,711 61,055 161,962 2,437,466 1,709,590 6,133 4,302 1,713,892 13 2030 36,550 109,089 273,296 1,519,919 231,017 40,994 865,015 3,783 62,241 161,962 2,561,007 1,743,921 6,353 4,326 1,748,248 14 2031 37,247 115,132 278,506 1,606,164 240,411 41,776 891,906 3,855 63,428 161,962 2,685,577 1,775,483 6,474 4,280 1,779,763 15 2032 37,943 121,174 283,716 1,692,650 250,100 42,557 919,310 3,927 64,614 161,962 2,811,197 1,804,400 6,805 4,368 1,808,768 16 2033 38,640 127,217 288,925 1,779,381 260,092 43,339 947,238 3,999 65,800 161,962 2,937,888 1,830,794 7,036 4,385 1,835,179 17 2034 39,337 133,259 294,135 1,866,362 270,395 44,120 975,696 4,071 66,987 161,962 3,065,670 1,854,781 7,272 4,400 1,859,180 18 2035 40,034 139,302 299,344 1,953,596 281,018 44,902 1,004,694 4,143 68,173 161,962 3,194,565 1,876,470 7,511 4,412 1,880,882 19 2036 40,730 145,345 304,554 2,041,088 291,970 45,683 1,034,241 4,216 69,360 161,962 3,324,596 1,895,971 7,754 4,422 1,900,393 20 2037 41,427 151,387 309,763 2,128,843 303,260 46,465 1,064,345 4,288 70,546 161,962 3,455,785 1,913,384 8,115 4,493 1,917,878 21 2038 42,124 157,430 314,973 2,216,864 314,898 47,246 1,095,016 4,360 71,733 161,962 3,588,155 1,928,810 8,368 4,498 1,933,308 Total 2,000,499 5,309,640 $27,896,806 $4,440,874 $796,446 $16,676,864 $73,494 $1,209,230 $32,392,368 $3,239,237 $15,462,109 $910,834 $121,125 $84,301 $995,135