APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

Similar documents
Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

Appendix Q Traffic Study

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Appendix C. Traffic Study

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

IRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE. Executive Summary... xii

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Appendix G Traffic and Parking Report

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH

Traffic Engineering Study

4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

APPENDIX G TRAFFIC STUDY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways.

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street

D R A F T TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. DARK HORSE GOLF RESORT EXPANSION Nevada County, CA. Prepared For:

LCPS Valley Service Center

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

Appendix C. Traffic Impact Study

Section 5.8 Transportation and Traffic

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

Los Angeles Mission College Facilities Master Plan Draft Program Environmental Impact Report 3.13 TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC

3.8 TRANSPORTATION, CIRCULATION AND PARKING

MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM RESEARCH INSTITUTE (MBARI) MASTER PLAN UPDATE MOSS LANDING, CALIFORNIA

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS J. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Appendix 5. Haymeadow Interim Traffic Analysis

700 University Avenue Mixed-Use Development. Traffic Impact Analysis

Quantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios:

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 661 BEAR VALLEY. Escondido, California September 1, LLG Ref

Revised Report. Traffic Study for Safeway Fuel Center at Washington Square Shopping Center. In The City of Petaluma.

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

STAFF REPORT # CHANGE OF ZONING

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR ST. JOSEPH'S ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITION

MADERAS HOTEL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS. LLG Ref Transportation Planner III & Jorge Cuyuch Transportation Engineer I

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

APPENDIX H. Transportation Impact Study

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

MONTEREY BAY OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS DRAFT REPORT

APPENDIX J LAKE WOHLFORD DAM REPLACEMENT PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (DAM REPLACEMENT) Lake Wohlford Dam Replacement Project EIR

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

VOA Vista Drive Residential housing Development TIA Project #13915 TABLE OF CONTENTS

4.7 Construction Surface Transportation

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

East Stockton Boulevard (South Sacramento) Costco Gasoline Expansion Fuel Station Expansion Trip Generation Estimate

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS B. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study

City of Pacific Grove

Draft Report: West Berkeley Bowl Project

Appendix H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

APPENDIX I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo

Section 3.12 Traffic and Transportation

1650 South Delaware Street

County State Aid Highway 32 (Cliff Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

Traffic Feasibility Study

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

5.9 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WESTMINSTER SEMINARY. Escondido, California June 25, LLG Ref Transportation Engineer II

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION FINAL REPORT

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

Lakeside Terrace Development

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development

Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement

HUMC/Mountainside Hospital Redevelopment Plan

Tijuana River Valley Regional Park Campground and Education Center

Transcription:

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

Rim of the World Unified School District Reconfiguration Prepared for: Rim of the World School District 27315 North Bay Road, Blue Jay, CA 92317 Prepared by: 400 Oceangate, Suite 480 Long Beach, CA 90802-4307 May 2010 J10-1622 - i -

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION... 2 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY... 5 Study Periods... 5 Study Area Determination... 5 Existing Traffic Volumes... 7 Development of Future Traffic Volumes... 7 Level of Service Criteria... 7 Level of Service Standard... 8 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 9 PROJECT TRIP CHARACTERISTICS... 13 Trip Generation... 13 Trip Distribution and Assignment... 14 OPENING YEAR CONDITIONS... 16 Opening Year 2010/2011 Without Project Conditions... 16 Opening Year With Project Conditions... 16 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS... Existing Conditions... Future Build 2010-2011 Conditions... Appendix A: Traffic Counts Appendix B: Intersection Level of Service Calculation Worksheets - ii -

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Project Location... 3 Figure 2: Rim of the World Unified School District Reconfiguration... 4 Figure 3: Study Intersections... 6 Figure 4: Existing VOE School Bus Staging and Parent Pick-Up Areas... 11 Figure 5: Existing Year 2010 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes... 12 Figure 6: Proposed Project Trip Distribution and Trip Assignments... 15 Figure 7: Year 2010/2011 With Project Weekday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes... 17 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Current and Proposed Grade Level Configuration and Enrollment... 2 Table 2: Intersection Level of Service Definitions... 8 Table 3: Existing Year 2010 Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service... 10 Table 4: Elementary (LGE) School Trip Generation and Trip Rate Calculation... 13 Table 5: Additional VOE Student Trip Generation... 14 Table 6: Additional MPH Student Trip Generation... 14 Table 7: Year 2010/2011 With Project Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service... 16 - iii -

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to evaluate the potential traffic and circulation impacts associated with the proposed changes to the grade-level configuration within the Rim of the World Unified School District (RWUSD) in San Bernardino County, California. RWUSD is proposing to consolidate facilities within the District. This report documents existing traffic conditions, forecasts future traffic conditions with the proposed reconfiguration plans. The scope of this traffic study was developed in consultation with staff from County of San Bernardino and Caltrans. This document is also intended to satisfy the requirements of disclosure of project impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The peak hour trip generation of the individual projects does not exceed the 250-round trip peak hour threshold that requires a (TIA) under the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program (CMP). However, the Valley of Enchantment site will be generating more than 50 peak hour trips on a state highway facility and therefore meets the threshold for Caltrans traffic impact study. However for consistency, this traffic study has been prepared consistent with County of San Bernardino guidelines and methodologies and Caltrans Traffic Impact Study Guidelines for both the study sites. The following scenarios are included in the analysis: Existing (2010) conditions Opening day (2010/2011) conditions Due to the anticipated traffic patterns and hours of operation for the project, this study analyzed a weekday 7:00 to 9:00 A.M. peak hour condition and weekday school peak hour 2:00 to 4:00 P.M. peak hour conditions. Therefore for the purposes of this analysis the P.M. peak hour represents the school peak hour occurring weekdays between 2:00 to 4:00 P.M. - 1 -

PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project location is illustrated in Figure 1. The proposed modifications will reconfigure grade levels at seven facilities within the RWUSD resulting in the consolidation of classrooms. The consolidation consists of assigning various grade levels to specific facilities within the District. The facilities affected are Valley of Enchantment (VOE), (LGE), Grandview Elementary School (GVE), (LAE), Charles Hoffman (CHE), Mary P. Henck Intermediate School (MPH), and the Mary Tone Education Center (MTE), which houses Mountain High. GVE currently services kindergarten to sixth grade; LAE currently services kindergarten to sixth grade, and VOE current services kindergarten to third grade. The proposed modifications consist of changing the District s grade level configuration so that GVE, LAE and VOE house kindergarten to fifth grade, and closing LGE to elementary school students. Additionally, MTE will no longer provide educational activities, thus, will become available for repurposing by the District. The impacts associated with the consolidation of the 6 th Grade students from LGE, GVE and LAE at MPH and the movement of the 4 th and 5 th grade students from LGE to VOE is analyzed as part of this traffic study. In order to accommodate the proposed consolidations and relocations, the VOE School will need physical modifications to increase the classroom capacity at the facility. All other facilities within the District will be capable of serving the students assigned to them without any physical modifications. Table 1 describes the existing grade level configuration and enrollment at each school, in addition to the grade level configuration and enrollment associated with the District s proposed modifications. Table 1: Current and Proposed Grade Level Configuration and Enrollment School Grade Level Configuration Enrollment Current Proposed Current Proposed Valley of Enchantment Elementary (VOE) Elementary (LGE) 4-6 K - 3 K - 5 420 755 Alternative Education Independent Study Adult Education 335 130* Grandview Elementary (GVE) K - 6 K - 5 593 527 Elementary (LAE) K - 6 K - 5 515 441 Charles Hoffman Elementary (CHE) K - 6 K - 6 392 392** Mary P. Henck Intermediate (MPH) 7-8 6-8 686 899 Mary Tone Education Center (MTE) Alternative Education and Independent Study Adult Education Repurpose 123 -- * Alternative Education, Independent Study, and Adult Education will utilize a total of 11 classrooms. ** Grade 6 parents form CHE will have the option to send their students to MPH, but CHE will continue to offer grade 6 classes. Figure 2 illustrates the proposed reconfiguration of RWUSD. The primary access points to VOE and MPH will continue to be provided via the unsignalized intersections of Site Entrance/Fir Lane and Rhine Road/Peninsula Drive, respectively. - 2 -

(LAE) Mary P. Henck Intermediate School (MPH) North Bay Rd Valley of Enchantment (VOE) Waters Dr Lake Dr Grandview (GVE) (LGE) San Moritz Dr Arosa Dr North Rd Grandview Rd Fairway Dr Club House Dr Peninsula Dr 9 Dr 9 N NOT TO SCALE Figure 1 Project Location Rim of the World School District Reconfiguration

Seeley Ln Valley of Enchantment (VOE) Mary P. Henck Intermediate School (MPH) Waters Dr (LGE) Grandview (GVE) 9 (LAE) 9 N NOT TO SCALE N Sixth Grade Class North Bay Rd Peninsula Dr Grass Valley Rd Rhine Rd Byron Rd Fir Ln Peninsula Dr Waters Dr Fairway Dr Club House Dr Grandview Rd Sixth Grade Class Figure 2 Rim of the World School District Reconfiguration Sixth Grade Class 4th & 5th Grade Classes Lake Dr North Rd San Moritz Dr Dr Arosa Dr

ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Study Periods The CMP requires analysis of existing conditions, project opening year conditions. The project is expected to be implemented for the 2010/2011 school year calendar. Therefore existing traffic counts is used for future baseline traffic conditions. Therefore, this report analyzes existing conditions and opening year with project conditions. The weekday A.M. peak hour is defined as the hour of highest traffic volumes occurring between 7:00 and 9:00 A.M. The P.M. peak hour is the hour when traffic on adjacent streets is typically greatest and the addition of project traffic is therefore most likely to impact traffic operations. However, the proposed project is expected to generate no or minimal traffic during the typical roadway 4:00 6:00 p.m. peak hour. Therefore, intersection operations during weekday P.M. peak hour is defined as the hour of highest traffic volumes occurring between 2:00 to 4:00 P.M. Study Area Determination The CMP guidelines require analysis of all key CMP intersections to which the project is forecasted to generate 100 to 250 two-way peak hour trips. In addition, Caltrans guidelines require analysis of key intersections to which the project will contribute 50 or more peak hour passenger car equivalent (PCE) trips. Based on the project trip generation and distribution (described in the following sections of the report), the proposed consolidation of schools at VOE and MPH sites are expected to produce fewer than the CMP TIA threshold requirements. However, the VOE site would generate more than 50 A.M. peak hour trips on State Route (SR-) and therefore meets the threshold for Caltrans traffic impact study. According to CMP guidelines, the study area for the traffic analysis also includes all freeway segments within five miles of the project site on which 100 or more project trips (total in both directions) are expected to travel during the peak hours. The nearest Interstate to the study area is I-215 and is more than the 5 miles from the study area. Furthermore, due the local nature of the proposed study, no trips are anticipated to use the freeway system. Following consultation with the County of San Bernardino the following three intersections within unincorporated County of San Bernardino are included in the study area: VOE Analysis Location: SR-/Waters Road MPH Analysis Location: Grass Valley Road / Peninsula Drive North Bay Road / Peninsula Drive The location of the three study intersections are illustrated in Figure 3. - 5 -

Intersection Geometry #1 State Highway / Waters Drive #2 Grass Valley Road/ #3 North Bay Road/ Peninsula Drive Peninsula Drive Valley of Enchantment (VOE) Waters Dr 1 Lake Dr Grandview (GVE) (LGE) San Moritz Dr Arosa Dr North Rd Grandview Rd Mary P. Henck Intermediate School (MPH) Fairway Dr Club House Dr Peninsula Dr 2 3 North Bay Rd 9 (LAE) N Dr 9 Legend 1 Study Intersection Schools NOT TO SCALE Figure 3 Study intersection Rim of the World School District Reconfiguration

Existing Traffic Volumes Existing weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections are based on peak period turning movement counts conducted on March 30, March 31 and May 11, 2010. Detailed traffic count sheets are included in Appendix A. All analyses in this report are based on peak hour traffic volumes at each intersection. Development of Future Traffic Volumes The project is expected to be implemented for the 2010/2011 school year calendar. Therefore existing traffic counts was used for future baseline traffic conditions. Level of Service Criteria The quality of traffic operations is characterized using the concept of level of service (LOS). Level of service is defined by a range of grades from A (best) to F (worst). At intersections, LOS A represents free-flow conditions with little or no delay. LOS F is characterized by extremely unstable flow conditions and severe congestion with volumes at or near the intersection s design capacity. This results in long queues backing up from all approaches to intersections. In this report, analysis of traffic operations was conducted using the Traffix 7.8 software, according to the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) delay methodology, which is described in the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209 (Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000). Under the HCM methodology, LOS is based on the average delay experienced by vehicles traveling through an intersection. The analysis incorporates the effects of the lane geometry at the intersection. Table 2 presents a brief description of each level of service letter grade, as well as the range of delays associated with each grade. As specified in the CMP, any intersection at which the volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio exceeds 1.0 is considered to be operating at LOS F, regardless of average vehicle delay. - 7 -

Level of Service Table 2: Intersection Level of Service Definitions Description Signalized Intersection Delay (seconds per vehicle) Unsignalized Intersection Delay (seconds per vehicle) A Excellent operation. All approaches to the intersection appear quite open, turning movements are easily made, and nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. < 10 < 10 Very good operation. Many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted B within platoons of vehicles. This represents stable flow. An approach >10 and < 20 to an intersection may occasionally be fully utilized and traffic queues >10 and < 15 start to form. C Good operation. Occasionally drivers may have to wait more than 60 seconds, and back-ups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most >20 and < 35 >15 and < 25 drivers feel somewhat restricted. D Fair operation. Vehicles are sometimes required to wait more than 60 >35 and < 55 seconds during short peaks. There are no long-standing traffic queues. >25 and < 35 E Poor operation. Some long-standing vehicular queues develop on critical approaches to intersections. Delays may be up to several >55 and < 80 >35 and < 50 minutes. Forced flow. Represents jammed conditions. Backups form locations F downstream or on the cross street may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approach lanes; therefore, volumes carried are not predictable. Potential for stop and go type traffic flow. > 80 > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000. Level of Service Standard The CMP level of service standard for intersection operations is LOS E. The CMP allows jurisdictions to establish more stringent standards for intersections within their jurisdiction. The County of San Bernardino has adopted a level of service standard of LOS E. CMP standards state that a CMP intersection will be considered deficient at LOS F (with mitigation required to provide LOS E or better operation), however the CMP recognizes that if the lead agency requires mitigation to a higher LOS, this takes precedence over the CMP requirements. The LOS threshold for State highway facilities is the same as the jurisdiction where the facility is located but no greater than a 45 second average delay per vehicle in the peak hour (middle of LOS D ). Caltrans acknowledges that this may not always be feasible. - 8 -

EXISTING CONDITIONS A comprehensive field review of intersection lane configurations, traffic control devices and traffic circulation was conducted on April 28, 2010. Based on the field review, access to the VOE school site is provided by SR-, Waters Drive, Spruce Drive, and Fir Lane which provides direct access to the VOE school driveway. The field review indicated that parents line up along the shoulder of Fir Lane to pick-up after the parking lot located on the west side of the VOE school building is fully utilized. The VOE school site is serviced by three school buses and the staging is located on the northwest side of the school building. Student pedestrians distribute to the local neighborhood along the unimproved shoulder of Fir Lane. There are a minimal number of students using bicycle for school trips. Figure 4 illustrates VOE school pick up/drop off areas and bus staging areas based on field observations. Access to the MPH is provided by Grass Valley Road from the west and North Bay Road from the east. Both roadways connect to Peninsula Drive, which in turn connects to Rhine Road which provides direct access to the MPH school driveway. Existing lane configurations and traffic control devices at the study intersections are illustrated in Figure 5. A brief description of key roadways in the study area is as follows: VOE School Site State Route (SR-) Within the VOE study area SR- is a north-south roadway located just east of the Valley Of Enchantment and provides access between SR- to the north and SR- to the south. In the project vicinity SR- is a two lane rural roadway, with 12-foot wide lanes and passing opportunities and very limited or no shoulder width. It forms a three-way stop controlled intersection with Waters Road. Waters Drive Waters Drive is a two lane local street that provides access to residential and small businesses. The posted speed limit is 25 MPH. Fir Lane Fir Lane is a two lane local street that provides access to the VOE school site. The posted speed limit is 25 MPH. MPH School Site Grass Valley Road Within the MPH study area Grass Valley Road is a north-south roadway located just west of the Mary P. Henck Intermediate School, and provides access between SR-9 to the south and SR- to the north. In the project vicinity Grass Valley Road is a two lane rural roadway with 12-foot wide lanes and a posted speed limit of 25 MPH. It forms a stop-controlled intersection with Peninsula Drive. Peninsula Drive Within the MPH study area Peninsula Drive is an east-west roadway located just south of the Mary P. Henck Intermediate School, and provides access between Grass Valley Road to the west and North Bay Road to the east. Peninsula Drive is a local two lane rural roadway with 12-foot wide lanes providing access to residential driveways. Posted speed limit adjacent to Grass Valley Road and North Bay Road is 25 MPH and 35 MPH, - 9 -

respectively. It forms unsignalized stop-controlled intersections with Grass Valley Road, Rhine Road and North bay Road. North Bay Road Within the MPH study area North Bay Road is a north-south roadway located east of the Mary P. Henck Intermediate School, and provides access between SR-9 to the south and SR- to the north. North Bay Road is a local two lane rural roadway with 12-foot wide lanes providing primary access to residential driveways and communities. Posted speed limit adjacent to Grass Valley Road and North Bay Road is 25 MPH and 35 MPH, respectively. Existing weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections are illustrated in Figure 5. A level of service analysis using the previously described methodologies was conducted to evaluate existing traffic conditions in the study area. The results of the intersection level of service analysis are summarized in Table 3. Detailed level of service calculation worksheets are included in Appendix B. As shown in Table 3, all study intersections are currently operating at satisfactory levels of service (LOS B or better) during weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hour conditions. Table 3: Existing Year 2010 Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service # Intersection Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay/Veh LOS Delay/Veh VOE School Site 1 SR / Waters Drive* B 10.3 A 9.9 MPH School Site 1 Grass Valley Road / Peninsula Drive B 11.4 B 11.1 2 North Bay Road / Peninsula Drive B 13.5 B 13.6 Notes: HCM 2000 Operations Methodology. LOS = Level of Service, Delay = Average Vehicle Delay (Seconds), *All-way stop controlled intersection. Existing Peak Hour Factors obtained from traffic counts were used. - 10 -

Valley of Enchantment (VOE) Waters Dr 1 Lake Dr Grandview (GVE) (LGE) San Moritz Dr Arosa Dr North Rd Grandview Rd Mary P. Henck Intermediate School (MPH) Fairway Dr Club House Dr Peninsula Dr 2 3 North Bay Rd 9 (LAE) Dr 9 Legend 1 Study Intersection N NOT TO SCALE Schools School Bus Staging Area Pick Up & Drop Off Location Figure 4 Existing VOE School Bus Staging and Parent Pick-up Areas Rim of the World School District Reconfiguration

Intersection Geometry Peak Hour Volumes #1 State Highway / Waters Drive #2 Grass Valley Road/ #3 North Bay Road/ Peninsula Drive Peninsula Drive #1 State Highway / #2 Grass Valley Road/ #3 North Bay Road/ Waters Drive Peninsula Drive Peninsula Drive 6 () 72 (42) 40 (28) 20 (17) 20 (19) 8 (4) 167 (160) 17 (24) 13 (29) 83 (84) 77 (72) 14 (13) 7 (15) 229 (153) 46 (60) 162 (2) 30 (34) 103 (59) 190 (140) 17 (17) 56 (50) 22 (13) 73 (79) 39 (62) Valley of Enchantment (VOE) Waters Dr 1 Lake Dr Grandview (GVE) (LGE) San Moritz Dr Arosa Dr North Rd Grandview Rd Mary P. Henck Intermediate School (MPH) Fairway Dr Club House Dr Peninsula Dr 2 3 North Bay Rd 9 (LAE) N Dr 9 Legend 1 Study Intersection Schools NOT TO SCALE Figure 5 Existing Conditions Analysis Rim of the World School District Reconfiguration

PROJECT TRIP CHARACTERISTICS LGE School currently provides elementary education to students in grades four through six. Under the proposed modifications, 4th and 5th grade elementary students at LGE will be transferred to VOE, and 6th grade students to MPH. By combining VOE and LGE to house kindergarten through 5 th grade at the VOE site, and redirecting 6th grade students to MPH, the LGE facility will become available to relocate Mountain High, a continuation high school, as well as alternative and adult education activities from their current location at the MTE facility. MPH is an intermediate school that currently provides education to grades seven and eight. Under the proposed modifications, MPH will be revised to serve as an intermediate school for grades six through eight, with sixth graders being moved from GVE, LAE, and LGE. CHE school will continue to serve kindergarten through 6 th grade, although parents will have the option of having 6 th grade students attend intermediate school at MPH. MPH was originally designed and used as a 6 th through 8 th grade intermediate school. Thus, the proposed modifications will utilize this facility in its intended capacity. Trip Generation Traffic driveway counts were conducted at the Elementary (LGE) school entrances on March 31, 2010 for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. Based on the school enrollment data provided by the school and the driveway counts, trip rates were determined for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. It is noted that the empirical trip generation data for the LGE students is higher than the standard elementary school trip rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation 8 th Edition, which would be used in the absence of sitespecific information. As shown in Table 4, the A.M. peak hour trip rate was 0.69 trips per student with a 50/50 percent inbound-outbound split. The P.M. peak hour trip rate was 0.30 trips per student with 43/57 percent inbound and outbound split. Table 4: Elementary (LGE) School Trip Generation and Trip Rate Calculation Student Population 335 Peak Hour Driveway Counts Trip Rate Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total AM Peak 115 115 230 0.34 0.34 0.69 School Peak 43 58 101 0.13 0.17 0.30 The trip rates determined from Table 4 were used to estimate the approximate number of trips from LGE that will be relocated to VOE with the proposed reconfiguration. Similarly, the trip rates were used to estimate the approximate number of trips from LGE, GVE, LAE schools that will be relocated to MPH school with the proposed reconfiguration. Table 5 summarizes the additional VOE trip generation with the relocation of 4 th and 5 th grade students from. Table 6 summarizes the additional MPH trip generation associated with the relocation of 6 th grade students from LGE, GVE and LAE. - 13 -

Table 5: Additional VOE Student Trip Generation School A.M. Peak Hour Trips P.M. Peak Hour Trips Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound Valley of Enchantment 90 90 34 45 (90) (90) (34) (45) Table 6: Additional MPH Student Trip Generation School A.M. Peak Hour Trips P.M. Peak Hour Trips Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound (23) (19) (9) (9) Grandview (21) (17) (8) (8) Elementary (24) (19) (9) (9) Mary P. Henck 68 56 26 27 Trip Distribution and Assignment Based on field observations, all future additional VOE school trips transferred from LGE will access the school via SR-, Waters Drive, Spruce Drive and Fir Lane. Similarly, all future additional trips transferred to MPH school will access the site as follows: LGE: via SR-9, Valley Road, Peninsula Drive and Rhine Road GVE: via Grass Valley Road, Peninsula Drive and Rhine Road LAE: via North Bay Road, Peninsula Drive and Rhine Road Figure 5 illustrates the proposed project trip distributions and project peak hour trip assignments at the VOE school and MPH school study locations. - 14 -

Trip Distribution Site Trip Assignment #1 State Highway / #2 Grass Valley Road/ #3 North Bay Road/ Waters Drive Peninsula Drive Peninsula Drive #1 State Highway / #2 Grass Valley Road/ #3 North Bay Road/ Waters Drive Peninsula Drive Peninsula Drive 65% 35% 36 () 24 (9) 100% 100% 65% 90 (45) 35% 44 (17) 90 (34) 20 (9) Valley of Enchantment (VOE) Waters Dr 1 4th & 5th Grade Classes Lake Dr Grandview (GVE) (LGE) San Moritz Dr Mary P. Henck Intermediate School (MPH) 9 (LAE) Dr Arosa Dr North Rd Grandview Rd Sixth Grade Class Fairway Dr Sixth Grade Class Club House Dr Peninsula Dr 2 3 North Bay Rd Sixth Grade Class N 9 Legend 1 Study Intersection Schools NOT TO SCALE Figure 6 Proposed Project Trip Distribution & Assignment Rim of the World School District Reconfiguration

OPENING YEAR CONDITIONS This section analyzes project opening year 2010/2011 conditions, with and without project development. Opening year traffic volumes were developed as described above in the Analysis Methodology section. The analysis assumes no improvements to the roadway network. Opening Year 2010/2011 Without Project Conditions As described earlier in the report, the proposed reconfiguration of the school with the school district is anticipated to be completed in time for the 2010-2011 school year and therefore existing traffic volumes is used for future baseline traffic conditions. Opening Year With Project Conditions Figure 7 illustrates the year 2010/2011 with project weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour traffic volumes at the study intersections. Note, per the guidelines in the San Bernardino County CMP (2005 Update), a PHF of 0.95 was used for all future analysis scenarios. A level of service analysis was conducted to evaluate projected intersection operations. LOS calculation worksheets are included in Appendix B. Table 7 shows the year 2010/2011 with project weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hour intersection level of service summary. As shown, all study intersections continue to operate at levels of service seen in the existing conditions. The impacts associated with the reconfiguration of the schools are negligible and therefore will not have any significant impact at the study intersections. Table 7: Year 2010/2011 With Project Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service # Intersection Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay/Veh LOS Delay/Veh VOE School Site 1 SR / Waters Drive* B 10.6 A 9.8 MPH School Site 1 Grass Valley Road / Peninsula Drive B 10.9 B 10.4 2 North Bay Road / Peninsula Drive B 13.3 B 13.0 Notes: HCM 2000 Operations Methodology. LOS = Level of Service, Delay = Average Vehicle Delay (Seconds), *All-way stop controlled intersection. Assumed a Peak Hour Factor (PHF) of 0.95 for future traffic conditions. - 16 -

Intersection Geometry Peak Hour Volumes #1 State Highway / Waters Drive #2 Grass Valley Road/ #3 North Bay Road/ Peninsula Drive Peninsula Drive #1 State Highway / #2 Grass Valley Road/ #3 North Bay Road/ Waters Drive Peninsula Drive Peninsula Drive 6 () 72 (42) 40 (28) 20 (17) 107 (93) 20 (19) 8 (4) 203 (178) 17 (24) 13 (29) 77 (72) 14 (13) 7 (15) 319 (198) 46 (60) 252 (252) 30 (34) 123 (68) 234 (157) 17 (17) 56 (50) 22 (13) 73 (17) 39 (62) Valley of Enchantment (VOE) Waters Dr 1 Lake Dr Grandview (GVE) (LGE) San Moritz Dr Arosa Dr North Rd Grandview Rd Mary P. Henck Intermediate School (MPH) Fairway Dr Club House Dr Peninsula Dr 2 3 North Bay Rd 9 (LAE) N Dr 9 Legend 1 Study Intersection Schools NOT TO SCALE Figure 7 Opening Year 2010/2011 With Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Rim of the World School District Reconfiguration

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS LGE School currently provides elementary education to students in grades four through six. Under the proposed modifications, 4th and 5th grade elementary students at LGE will be transferred to VOE, and 6th grade students to MPH. By combining VOE and LGE to house kindergarten through 5 th grade at the VOE site, and redirecting 6th grade students to MPH, the LGE facility will become available to relocate Mountain High, a continuation high school, as well as alternative and adult education activities from their current location at the MTE facility. MPH is an intermediate school that currently provides education to grades seven and eight. Under the proposed modifications, MPH will be revised to serve as an intermediate school for grades six through eight, with sixth graders being moved from GVE, LAE, and LGE. CHE school will continue to serve kindergarten through 6 th grade, although parents will have the option of having 6 th grade students attend intermediate school at MPH. MPH was originally designed and used as a 6 th through 8 th grade intermediate school. Thus, the proposed modifications will utilize this facility in its intended capacity. Existing Conditions Under existing conditions, all study intersections are currently operating at satisfactory levels of service during weekday A.M. and P.M. peak hour conditions. Future Build 2010-2011 Conditions Under year 2010-2011 with project conditions, all study intersections are projected to continue operating at satisfactory levels of service during weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour conditions. The impacts associated with the reconfiguration of the schools at the study intersections are negligible and therefore will not have any significant impact at the study intersections. - -