Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

Similar documents
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

PROJECT BACKGROUND 3

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Mr. Vince Mauceri General Manager Transportation Operations and Technology

Issues Facing the Panel

Yonge-Eglinton. Mobility Hub Profile. September 19, 2012 YONGE- EGLINTON

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Developing Toronto s Transit Network Plan to Public Information Meeting June 21, 2016

Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan

Scarborough Transit Planning

APPENDIX 6: Transportation Modelling Considerations City of Toronto, February 2014

Branch Edmonton Transit

Mississauga Transit 2009 Budget

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

Opportunities for Improved Bus Service on Finch Avenue 27 April 2011

Making Tracks to Torontonians 2012

6 Mobility Plus Annual Service Plan

Needs and Community Characteristics

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

2011 Saskatoon Transit Services Annual Report

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Recommended Vision for the Downtown Rapid Transit Network

CITY of GUELPH Transit Growth Strategy and Plan, Mobility Services Review. ECO Committee

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Yonge Relief Network Study (YRNS)

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

CONNECTING THE REGION

EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) PLEASE SIGN IN

WELCOME TO OUR PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit (LRT)

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

RELIEF LINE PRELIMINARY BENEFITS CASE ANALYSIS. November 2012

Pembina Institute REPORT. Mayor Ford s. New Transit Proposal. Analysis and recommendations. by Cherise Burda and Graham Haines

Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Public Information Session June 2, Transportation Planning Section City Planning Division Toronto Transit Commission

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

AMTRAK ENVISIONS WORLD CLASS HIGH-SPEED RAIL Washington to Boston in about three hours at up to 220 mph (354 kph)

EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)

Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

Attachment 5 Eglinton West LRT Planning and Technical Update

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

2.4 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Support the revitalization of urban cores STRATEGIC DIRECTION

METRO TRANSIT a n n ua l re p o r t. madison, wisconsin // mymetrobus.com

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 2017

Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

Regional Express Rail: Kipling Station Project Update. Ryah Kazman, Community Relations Specialist Metrolinx

STAFF REPORT INFORMATION ONLY

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Developing Toronto s Transit Network Plan to 2031

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Executive Summary. Phase 2 Evaluation Report. Introduction

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

5 RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK PLAN PRINCIPLES, METROLINX BUSINESS CASE, AND ALTERNATIVE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ANALYSIS UPDATE

LRT Almaty, PPP. 23 January 2018, Brussels

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

1.963 Report: A Sustainable Transportation Plan for MIT Campus May 2007

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN. Making Headway. Capital Investments to Keep Transit Moving

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

Public Transit Planning and. Advocacy

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

BENCHMARKING URBAN TRANSPORT-A STRATEGY TO FULFIL COMMUTER ASPIRATION

The Latest on Joint Development Policy Guidance

PUBLIC TRANSPORT MODAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ROLES

Transit Fares for Multi-modal Transportation Systems

Appendix G: Rapid Transit Technology Backgrounder July 2017

Chicago Transit Authority Service Standards and Policies

Center for Energy Studies. Lauren Lee Stuart. Louisiana State University

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

METRO SERVICE CHANGE LINE 577 EXPRESS: A TALE OF TWO BUS LINES

FACTSHEET on Metro Systems

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Level of Service Analysis for Urban Public Transportation of Dumlupinar University Evliya Celebi Campus in Kutahya, Turkey

BUS STOP DESIGN & PLANNING GUIDE

Rate Review 2017 Off-Street Municipal Parking Facilities

McNICOLL BUS GARAGE. Public Open House June 12, 2017 Mary Ward Catholic School

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

Smart Green Transportation of LG CNS. Seoul Case

brought to you by the Transport Knowledge Hub: Public Transport and the next generation Michelle McCormick, NZ Transport Agency

Transcription:

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 1

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 2

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 3

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 4

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 5

Transit Service right. service amount time place maximize mobility maximize quality service affordable: users taxpayers 6

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Decision rules, standards for service resources: objective, data-, fact-based: ridership origin-destination data travel behaviour research grounded in business logic, principles transparent, quantifiable, reproducible applied consistently, fairly, equitably 6/30/2015 7

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes System structure and design: grid network: exploit Toronto s road-system grid maximize travel choices, combinations subway-oriented: fastest service for longer trips most cost-effective mode for high-volume demand network connectivity: fullest coverage, access throughout city maximize travel choices, combinations 6/30/2015 8

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes System structure and design: most-direct route possible no off-route diversions fastest, minimum travel time no duplication: best use of available resources minimize transfers: consistent, with travellers behaviour, preferences 9

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Coverage, access: design: 10-minute walk to transit 5-minute not eligible for additional service overnight: 15-minute walk to transit conditional on density, land use to support viable operation exceptions: physical, geographical barriers 10

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Accessibility: all vehicles, facilities accessible by 2025: accommodate people using mobility devices barrier-free paths, movement accommodate people with visual and hearing impairments accessible communications / customer service specialized service (Wheel-Trans) for physical disabilities 11

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Minimum ROI on new service expenditures: determine required resources gross operating costs project new ridership, revenues (new to system) calculate net operating costs determine new riders gained / net dollar operating cost minimum ROI threshold = 0.23 new riders / net dollar cost: eligible for trial implementation subject to budget availability 12

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Productivity standard: boardings per service hour minimum productivity threshold = 15 boardings / hour productivity of 10-15 allowed if no alternative service within 600 metres (8-minute walk) exceptions allowed in accordance with policy objective, budget availability: eg all-day, every-day: 9 boardings / hour 13

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Changes, expansion to routes: decision rule overall / net improvement for customers effects on customers: measured wrt effects on travel time: walk access wait time in-vehicle travel time transfer implications weighted by number of customers affected weighted by customers perception of effects: derived from travel behaviour research assessment must show net positive results for customers 14

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Travel Behaviour Research Customer Perceptions Travel time: 1 minute in-vehicle 1 minute waiting 1 minute walking 1 transfer = 1 minute = 1.5 minutes = 2.5 minutes = 10 minutes 15

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Express service: existing corridor characteristics: ridership levels high proportion of long-distance trips concentration of ons / offs at major stops major generators at route ends (subway, college, shopping centre) assess for net benefits / disbenefits to customers (customer-minutes) net effect must be positive 16

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Additional period of service -- existing route: projected ridership: current ridership on route, other nearby routes determine cost service hours, dollars assessment based on productivity (boardings / hour) threshold 10 subject to budget availability 17

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Earlier start / later finish to service: project ridership: current ridership at beginning / end of service related to timing relative to subway start / finish determine cost: service hours, dollars assessment based on productivity (boardings / hour) threshold 10 subject to budget availability 18

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Maximum waiting times / minimum level of service: bus, streetcar routes = 30 minutes subway = 5 minutes customers won t wait longer than scheduled 30 minutes minimum required to keep service competitive rapid transit must be rapid 19

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes On-board crowding standards used to: identify overcrowding on routes: increase service identify surplus capacity on routes: service reduction when required 20

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes On-board crowding standards: tolerable crowding / comfort move to, from doors accommodate surge loading Vehicle bus articulated bus streetcar articulated streetcar low-floor streetcar Peak Crowding Standard 50 to 53 77 74 108 130 21

22

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes prevent overcrowding prevent customer discomfort, dissatisfaction 23

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes University of Melbourne, Australia:...TTC practices are exceptional internationally resulting in high occupancy rates by international standards, and efficient use of staff and vehicles. 24

TTC Service Profile 6/30/2015 25

26

27

28

29

1,508 buses in peak service 30

202 streetcars in peak service 31

105 rapid transit trains in peak service 32

33

34

35

36

37

38

On-Board Crowding Peak Bus Service existing crowding standard (50 to 53 avg. per bus): 5% of peak bus service is overcrowded; 14 routes: 15 periods of operation approved crowding standard (47 to 50 avg. per bus): 15% of peak bus service is overcrowded; 34 routes: 40 periods of operation 39

Maximum Wait-Time Standards Status peak-period service: 100% within standard (338 of 339 periods of operation) off-peak service: 99% within standard (1,544 of 1,565 periods of operation) 40

Transfers Required in TTC Trips 6/30/2015 41

Accessibility Status all buses accessible; over 90% low-floor 42

43

Accessible TTC s New Low-Floor 100% Low-Floor Streetcar Streetcars 6/30/2015 44 44

45

Accessibility Status Accessible streetcars: accessible low-floor streetcars on 510 Spadina 2015: 509 Harbourfront, 511 Bathurst, 505 Dundas all streetcar routes accessible by 2019 46

Accessibility Status all subway trains accessible 47

Accessible Fare Gates 48

49

50

Accessible Subway Stations Pape Station 51

Accessibility Subway Stations Pape Station 52

Accessible Subway Stations Dufferin, Lawrence West just completed currently: 34 stations accessible 53

54

55

56 56

57 57

58 58

Wheel-Trans Demand 4.5 4 Annual Demand millions 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18 Year 59

Wheel-Trans maintain unaccommodated rate < 1% scheduling, service revisions increase capacity integration with conventional system improve efficiency: low-floor accessible streetcars more accessible subway stations AODA mandated eligibility conditional, temporary 6/30/2015 60

Wheel-Trans: Projected Modal Split 2015 Bus AT Sedan 29% 39% 32% Percentage of Trips by Mode 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 47% 29% 24% 0% '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 Year Projections Bus AT Sedan 61

Wheel-Trans: Projected Usage by Mode By 2025: 25% of Demand on Integrated Conventional Services 25% 16% 39% 20% Bus AT Sedan Integrated 62

TTC Commuter Parking 6/30/2015 63 63

TTC Commuter Parking 14 stations 28 lots 12,300 spaces Finch East, West: biggest, growing market ~ 6 million transit trips annually net operating income + $2.2 million (23% margin) demand constrained by lack of capacity at half of lots 64

6/30/2015 65 65

TTC Commuter Parking 60% of spaces: temporary / long-term closures, relocations: Build Toronto, Metrolinx long-term forecast: 38% reduction Build Toronto Metrolinx: Eglinton LRT construction 750 spaces removed: Kennedy, Eglinton West 66

TTC Ridership Profile 57% are female 58% have driver s licence 66% have household vehicle 66% are employed 32% are students 6/30/2015 67

Age Distribution of TTC Customers 68

69 69

70

Purpose of Travel on TTC Trip Purpose Percentage work other school 45% 28% 27% 6/30/2015 72

73

Public Support for Transit in Toronto Ridership per Capita (using boardings) Agency / City Population Ridership per Capita York Region 1,055,558 30 Washington, DC 3,719,567 111 Vancouver 2,451,783 127 Chicago 3,425,958 154 TTC 2,825,620 295 Montréal 1,959,987 360 New York 8,008,278 432 6/30/2015 74

Productivity: Boardings per Service Hour 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 productivity: system-wide -- approximately 100 boardings / hour 6/30/2015 75

Comparison of Revenue / Cost Ratios City Revenue / Cost TTC 71% New York 53% Washington 51% Chicago 45% Vancouver 44% York Region 38% 6/30/2015 76

Subsidy / Rider Comparison Among Cities City Subsidy / Rider TTC $0.89 Montréal $1.21 New York $1.53 Vancouver $1.63 Chicago $1.91 Washington $2.39 York Region $4.34 6/30/2015 77

2015 Service Initiatives Council s $95 Million Investment in Better Service 78

Children Aged 12 & Under Ride Free 11 million annual customers make public transit more affordable for families children riders become adult riders 6/30/2015 79

All-Door Boarding & Proof-of-Payment 92 million annual customers speed-up time to serve stops: decreases travel times 6/30/2015 80

Subway Service Reliability 170 million annual customers running time adjustments, improved route management: peak periods, Lines 1, 2 improve reliability, reduce delays 6/30/2015 81

Subway Service Reliability Punctuality Line 1 Yonge-University Subway 100 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 Financial Periods 5/2013 to 4/2015 Actual Target 12 per. Mov. Avg. (Actual) 82

Subway Service Reliability improve reliability of signals, track, communication systems: reduce delays on subway 6/30/2015 83

Bus, Streetcar Service Reliability 44 million annual customers running time adjustments, improved route management: reduce short-turns, bunching, gapping on bus, streetcar routes 6/30/2015 84

85

504 King 86

29 Dufferin 87

88

89

New Buses, Temporary Garage 50 million annual customers more buses for peak service (2016): new express services, reduced crowding, wait times 6/30/2015 90

Reduce Wait Times & Crowding 20 million annual customers restore 2012 service cuts on busiest bus, streetcar routes 2016: add peak service on 20+ routes in 25+ periods of operation 6/30/2015 91

Express Bus Network 30 million annual customers 2016: create new, improved express services peak, off-peak: faster, more-comfortable service for customers 6/30/2015 92

Overnight Network 5 million annual customers accommodate diverse travel needs in Toronto: 99% of Torontonians within 15-minute walk of service 6/30/2015 93

All-Day, Every-Day Service 77 million annual customers restore 2011 service cuts -- 43 routes, 122 periods of operation: customers can count on transit any time for their travel needs 6/30/2015 94

Ten-Minute-or-Better Network 48 million annual customers establish city-wide network of frequent bus, streetcar routes frequent, reliable service all day, all evening, every day 6/30/2015 95

Reduce Wait Times & Crowding 66 million annual customers restore 2012 service cuts on busiest bus, streetcar routes add off-peak service on 30 routes, 102 periods of operation 6/30/2015 96

2016 Operating Budget

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 99