Southeastern State s Experience with MOVES

Similar documents
THE MOVES TRANSITION MADE EASY THE TDOT WAY. Introduction TDOT s Proposal Work Completed In Progress What s HOT Questions?

CHAPTER 7: EMISSION FACTORS/MOVES MODEL

THE EFFECTS OF RAISING SPEED LIMITS ON MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS

Emerging Technologies & Autonomous Vehicle Readiness Planning. Georgia Planning Association Conference Jekyll Island, GA September 5, 2018

Emission Rate Approach for Evaluating the Differences in Emissions Between CNG and Diesel Busses

Automated and Connected Vehicles: Planning for Uncertainty

Using the MOVES Model to Do a Project Level PM Air Quality Analysis 2010 TRB Environment and Energy Research Conference Raleigh, North Carolina

REGIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY: TRANSPORTATION AND STATIONARY ENERGY

MAKING USE OF MOBILE6 S CAPABILITIES FOR MODELING START EMISSIONS

Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects

BLACK KNIGHT HPI REPORT

BUILDING AND HIGHWAY CONTRACTORS Addressing Retrofit Challenges

State Highway 32 East TIGER Discretionary Grant Application APPENDIX C - BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS REPORT

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Heavy Duty Trucks: Understanding Key Trends,

Changing Behavior and Achieving Mode Shi2 Goals

ADVANTAGES OF USING SMARTWAY TECHNOLOGIES

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

State Safety Oversight Program

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Parking Management Element

CENTRAL FLORIDA EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY Master Plan Update Board Workshop #2

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Emission and Air Quality Trends Review

Texas Oil and Gas Emissions Inventory Improvement Projects

Planning for Sustainability: Electric Vehicles

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

CO 2 Emissions from Cars, Trucks & Buses in the Metropolitan Washington Region

Transit Modeling Update District One Implementation & Status Report. Purpose and Need

Background. ezev Methodology. Telematics Data. Individual Vehicle Compatibility

Overview of Regional Commuter Rail Webinar: Phoenix, Arizona December 18, 2013

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

The Screening and Selection of Regionally Significant Projects

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

Reducing deaths, injuries, and loss from motor vehicle crashes

Energy Technical Memorandum

11/24/2010. U.S. Highway 41 Tamiami Trial Petroleum Brownfields Road to Revitalization. By Channing Bennett EPA Region 4 UST Program

SOUTHEAST VOLUSIA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY GHYABI & ASSOCIATES, INC. DRAFT CITIES OF EDGEWATER NEW SMYRNA BEACH PORT ORANGE COUNTY OF VOLUSIA

gov October 2, 2014 Richard Barney Carlson Shawn Salisbury Matt Shirk John Smart

Florida Strategic Highway Safety Planning Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Update and Performance Overview

Making Use Of MOBILE6 s Capabilities For Modeling Start Emissions

CR 510/85 Street from CR 512 to 58 Avenue

APPLICATION OF A PARCEL-BASED SUSTAINABILITY TOOL TO ANALYZE GHG EMISSIONS

Transportation Statistical Data Development Report BAY COUNTY 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Final Traffic Technical Memorandum

Traffic Safety Facts 2002

Marion County Transportation Impact Fee Update Study

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

3/16/2016. How Our Cities Can Plan for Driverless Cars April 2016

Options for Scenario Five Mileage Fee (DMV Collection)

NTSB Recommendations to Reduce Speeding-Related Crashes

Attachment C: Benefit-Cost Analysis Spreadsheet

Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects

The Georgia CMAQ Program. Practice Makes Perfect

Roadway Congestion in Major Urban Areas 1982 to 1987 October 1989

Best Practices to Reducing Suspended and Revoked Drivers 2013 Region IV Conference Broomfield, CO

TRANSFORMING TRANSPORTATION

Air. Goals: Improve statewide air quality Reduce greenhouse gas emissions 9 DRAFT DRAFT

San Joaquin Valley APCD

CALIFORNIA MOTOR VEHICLE STOCK, TRAVEL AND FUEL FORECAST

TECHNICAL NOTE Transportation Air Quality Technical Support Interagency Contract with Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission

Effect of Ethanol Fuels upon OBD-II Systems Vehicle Test Phase

HDR Lunch and Learn April 23, Lori Clark, Program Manager, Transportation North Central Texas Council of Governments

report Southeast Florida Road and Transit User Cost Study 2014 Update Florida Department of Transportation District Four Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

DRAFT Subject to modifications

Development of the Idaho Statewide Travel Demand Model Trip Matrices Using Cell Phone OD Data and Origin Destination Matrix Estimation

Autonomous Vehicles Meet Human Drivers: Traffic Safety Issues for States

September 22, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board

CSA State of the Union

Useful Information. Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSAT) Emission Rate Look-up Tables (ERLT)

CAPTURING THE SENSITIVITY OF TRANSIT BUS EMISSIONS TO CONGESTION, GRADE, PASSENGER LOADING, AND FUELS

Appendix 17. Pre-Analysis Consensus Template

GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT. Residents enjoying the newly opened Brickell City Centre on Nov. 3, 2016.

Clean Cities Program Overview

Heavy-Duty Low-NOx and Phase 2 GHG Plans

Criteria. As background, the US Environmental Protection Agency s Green Vehicle Guide states that:

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

Measuring Accessibility. Andrew Owen Director, Accessibility Observatory May 17, 2017

USF Tampa Campus Percent Mode Share 2010

Alamo Natural Gas Vehicle Consortium

MAGAZINE S. The U.S. and. Canada s. Top 50. Passenger Rail Projects for 2003

Transportation Performance Management Overview. Laura Toole 2018 Ohio Planning Conference

final report Northwest Toll Expressway Value Pricing Program Pilot Study Georgia State Road and Tollway Authority Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

Do Standard Trip Generation Rates Overstate Impact of Commercial Uses?

Getting Parking Right in Emerging Mixed Use Environments

Truck Axle Weight Distributions

Types of owners: Corporate, Personal, Personal lease. 84,569 Last reported odometer reading. $850 Above retail book value

First-Last Mile Greenhouse Gas Analysis of Los Angeles Transit

PEMS International Conference & Workshop April 3, 2014

Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

FleetDASH. Fleet Sustainability Dashboard - FleetDASH. Mark Singer National Renewable Energy Laboratory August 17, 2017

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

12/2/2010. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) funded the Observational Survey of Motorcyclists through the use of highway safety funds.

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Abstract. Context 7/30/2010 1

HRTPO Strategic Campaign. Passenger Rail. Agenda Item #11. Presentation To. May 19, Presentation By

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

TRAFFIC VOLUME TRENDS

The Value of Travel-Time: Estimates of the Hourly Value of Time for Vehicles in Oregon 2007

Transcription:

Southeastern State s Experience with MOVES Technical Challenges and Solutions presented to Tennessee Model Users Group presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Keli Paul Kemp, AICP David Kall March 4, 2011 Transportation leadership you can trust.

Overview MOVES Experience in the Southeast Overview of MOVES Challenges Technical Challenges & Solutions» Linking Travel Demand Models to MOVES Input Data (Emissions Preprocessor)» Linking Travel Demand Models to MOVES Output Data (Emissions Postprocessor) Additional Resources 2

MOVES Experience in the Southeast

CS MOVES Experience in the Southeast Florida 4» Florida DOT Systems Planning Office: Developed first Air Quality Postprocessor in FL using MOVES as an emission rate model and integrated within Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS) Provided training to FDOT D3 and MPO staff» Hillsborough County MPO (Tampa): Using MOVES greenhouse gas (GHG) emission rates by speed to calculate GHG emissions for LRTP scenarios using Access based postprocessor

CS MOVES Experience in the Southeast (Cont d) Georgia» Atlanta Regional Commission: Providing guidance on how to update Cube air quality postprocessor to reflect MOVES Provided training to ARC staff on running MOVES, input requirements, and data options. Tennessee» Chattanooga TPO: Updating TransCAD air quality postprocessor to reflect MOVES 5

Overview of MOVES Challenges

The MOVES Model U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) model for estimating emissions from highway vehicles Required for State Implementation Plan (SIP) and transportation conformity emissions inventories after March 2012 Key Challenges» New data input requirements» New structure requires new methods of interfacing with travel demand models 7

MOVES Input Data Requirements 8

Two Options for Applying MOVES Option 1: MOVES as an Emissions Inventory Model» Requires running of MOVES every time the travel demand model is modified» Uses output loaded network from travel demand model Travel Demand Model MOVES Option 2: MOVES as an Emissions Rate Model» Significantly reduces frequency of MOVES runs» Uses emissions rates from MOVES as inputs into travel demand model MOVES Travel Demand Model 9

What Options Are Other Regions Using? Option 1: MOVES as an Emissions Inventory Model» Metropolitan Washington COG (most work has been with MOVES as an inventory model, but still evaluating option 1 v. 2) 10 Option 2: MOVES as an Emissions Rates Model» Chattanooga, TPO (TN)» Atlanta Regional Commission (GA)» Florida (statewide)» Dallas-Fort Worth (TX)» Houston (TX)» Salt Lake City (UT)» Baltimore (MD)» Cincinnati (OH, KY, IN)

Technical Challenges & Solutions Linking Travel Demand Models to MOVES Input Data (Emissions Preprocessor)

Data Requirements for County Data Manager Likely Use Local VMT Population with MOVES National Default Vehicle Type Ratios Source (Vehicle) Type Population No National Defaults Available in MOVES (Must Use Travel Demand Model or HPMS Data) Vehicle Type Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Average Speed Road Type National Defaults Available in MOVES (Obtain Interagency Approval to Use National Defaults) Age (Population Based) Ramp Fraction Meteorology Fuel Supply Inspection and Maintenance Program 12

Source (Vehicle) Type Population Number of vehicles in each year by 13 MOVES vehicle type categories Age (Population Based) Vehicle Type Vehicle Miles Traveled Ramp Fraction Source (Vehicle) Type Population Average Speed Meteorology Road Type Fuel Supply Inspection and Maintenance Program Not required in MOBILE6 Data source(s)» State Department of Motor Vehicles (registration data)» R.L. Polk data (cleaned up version of registration data)» MOVES defaults EPA converter available for areas that want to convert MOBILE6 vehicle types to MOVES 13

Source (Vehicle) Type Population (continued) Source (Vehicle) Type Population Average Speed To predict vehicle population in future years Age (Population Based)» EPA suggests scaling vehicle population in proportion to VMT or human population» GA EPD method uses human population projections through 2030 Vehicle Type Vehicle Miles Traveled Ramp Fraction Meteorology Road Type Fuel Supply Inspection and Maintenance Program 14

Atlanta 13 County Vehicle Population 15

Age of vehicle population by age of vehicle Was required in MOBILE6 Data source(s)» State Department of Motor Vehicles (registration data)» R.L. Polk data (cleaned up version of registration data)» MOVES defaults Age (Population Based) Vehicle Type Vehicle Miles Traveled Ramp Fraction Source (Vehicle) Type Population Average Speed Meteorology Road Type Fuel Supply Inspection and Maintenance Program 16 EPA converter available for areas that want to convert MOBILE6 vehicle types to MOVES

Vehicle Type VMT VMT traveled by vehicle type Age (Population Based)» As input to MOVES: VMT by 6 HPMS vehicle type categories» As used in AQPP: VMT by 13 MOVES vehicle types Vehicle Type Vehicle Miles Traveled Ramp Fraction Source (Vehicle) Type Population Average Speed Meteorology Road Type Fuel Supply Inspection and Maintenance Program Optional in MOBILE6 MOVES requires VMT by 6 HPMS vehicle types as an input, but outputs emission factors by 13 MOVES vehicle types 17 Most travel demand models output VMT by total passenger trips and sometimes, by truck type or SOV/HOV

Vehicle Type VMT (continued) EPA encourages the use of local data for the six HPMS vehicle types and discourages the use of national defaults unless it is used to further break down the six HPMS types into the 13 MOVES vehicle types* Peer Review» MWCOG using combination of truck model data, vehicle registration data, and HPMS data» NCTCOG ran sensitivity tests using some type of local data» Florida considering use of HPMS data, although concerned about data quality 18 * SHRP2 C09 Incorporating GHG Emissions into the Collaborative Decision-Making Process, Task 7B: Detailed Reference Material for Addressing Greenhouse Gases in Transportation Decision-Making, PB Americas with Cambridge Systematics and E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc., 2009.

Categories Between Travel Demand Model & MOVES Travel Demand Model ARC Model Florida DOT District 3 Model Chattanooga TPO Model Model Output Trips 3 Vehicle Type Categories: SOV/HOV/ Commercial, Medium Trucks, Heavy Trucks 1 Vehicle Type Category: Total Passenger Trips 1 Vehicle Type Category: Total Passenger Trips * Local Data Model VMT by 3 Vehicle Types VMT % Dist among 6 HPMS Vehicle Types VMT % Dist among 6 HPMS Vehicle Types 6 HPMS Veh. Types for MOVES Input Apply MOVES defaults to Model VMT by 3 Vehicle Types Apply % Dist. (6 Vehicle Types) to Model VMT Apply % Dist (6 Vehicle Types) to Model VMT 13 MOVES Veh. Types for AQPP Apply MOVES defaults Apply MOVES defaults Apply MOVES defaults *Light-, Medium-, and Heavy-Duty Truck trips not validated 19

Vehicle Type VMT Link from ARC Model to MOVES ARC Model ARC Truck Model HPMS 20 MOVES

Vehicle Type VMT Link from FL and Chattanooga Models to MOVES Model HPMS 21 MOVES

Average Speed Percent of vehicle hours traveled (VHT) found in each of the 5 mph speed bins Optional in MOBILE6 Data source(s)» Travel Demand Model Age (Population Based) Vehicle Type Vehicle Miles Traveled Ramp Fraction Source (Vehicle) Type Population Average Speed Meteorology Road Type Fuel Supply Inspection and Maintenance Program 22 A separate distribution into the speed bins is required for each combination of:» Road Type» Source Type» Hour of Day

Average Speed (continued) EPA acknowledges that it may not be available at this level of detail Age (Population Based) Vehicle Type Vehicle Miles Traveled Ramp Fraction Source (Vehicle) Type Population Average Speed Meteorology Road Type Fuel Supply Inspection and Maintenance Program A converter is provided to convert VMT distribution to VHT distribution 23

Road Type of VMT by 5 MOVES road types Optional in MOBILE6 Age (Population Based) Vehicle Type Vehicle Miles Traveled Ramp Fraction Source (Vehicle) Type Population Average Speed Meteorology Road Type Fuel Supply Inspection and Maintenance Program A separate distribution is requested for each of the 13 MOVES vehicle types Data source(s)» Summarize travel model results using MOVES road type/model facility type equivalency table 24

County Data Manager for MOVES Runs County Data Manager Inputs Source Type Population Age Excel Sheet Tab Name Atlanta Florida sourcetypeyear sourcetypeage 2002 RL Polk Data 2002 RL Polk Data State Registration Data (DMV) State Registration Data (DMV) Chattanooga (Under Development) (Investigating) (Investigating) Vehicle Type VMT HPMSVTypeYear MonthVMTFraction Truck portion of TDM plus MOVES defaults HPMS Vehicle Type National Defaults HPMS Vehicle Type (Investigating reliability) 25 DayVMTFraction HourVMTFraction Average avgspeed Speed Road Type roadtype Ramp Fraction RoadType 13 Co. and 7 Co. from TDM 13 Co. and 7 Co. from TDM National Defaults National Defaults from TDM from TDM from TDM from TDM National Default (8%) checked against local TDM output

Technical Challenges & Solutions Linking Travel Demand Models to MOVES Output Data (Emissions Postprocessor)

Emissions Modeling Process Simplified Structure Run MOVES Reformat Emission Factors Prepare Model Links Calculate and Summarize Emissions 27

Emissions Modeling Process Detailed Structure Run MOVES Reformat Emission Factors Prepare Model Links Calculate Emissions 28

Emissions Postprocessor Development 29 3-Step Process Within Travel Demand Modeling Platform: 1. Reformat running and non-running emission factors from MOVES SQL database 2. Prepare travel model links (adjust centroid connector speeds, calculate intrazonal VMT, append HPMS functional class codes, check for missing HPMS functional class codes, append MOVES Road Type code, calculate HPMS adjustment factors and apply to model VMT if appropriate) 3. Apply running emission factors by travel model link and non-running emission factors by vehicle population to calculate emissions inventory

Sample Output Emissions Report 30

Sample Output Network with Running Emissions 31

Additional Resources

Additional Resources U.S. EPA s MOVES website» http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/index.htm U.S. EPA Converter Tools» http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/tools.htm FHWA/AMPO MOVES Model User Group Web Conferences» http://www.ampo.org/content/index.php?pid=32 33