Challenges for Electricity Distribution Tariff Design in the Smart Grid era: A Conceptual Approach Cherrelle Eid

Similar documents
Power distribution: contributing to the European energy transition

Global Trends in the Political Economy of Smart Grids

Electromobility: some new business models in development

GEODE Report: Flexibility in Tomorrow s Energy System DSOs approach

Distribution grid congestion management Remco Verzijlbergh, section Energy and Industry, faculty of Technology, Policy and Management

Smart Grid. Sahar Rahim. Supervisor: Dr. Nadeem Javaid. MS-Electrical Engineering


Demand Response as a Power System Resource

Load profiling for balance settlement, demand response and smart metering in Finland

Microgrids in the EU TP SmartGrids Context

Plenary Session 2. Regulatory aspects and market operations in smart grid environments

Technical Conference: Alternative Utility Cost Recovery Mechanisms

Smart Grids and Integration of Renewable Energies

Siemens Future HANNOVER MESSE Smart Generation Solutions: Making the virtual reality happen Tobias Wittmann

Residential electricity tariffs in Europe: current situation, evolution and impact on residential flexibility. Youseff Oualmakran LABORALEC

The Role of DSO as Facilitator of the Electricity Markets in Macedonia. Key aspects and considerations

Technology and Non Price Influences. Harvard Electricity Policy Group (October, 2009) Tom Osterhus, PhD View.

Smart Grids from the perspective of consumers IEA DSM Workshop

New Business Models for Distribution Network Operators

Market Models for Rolling-out Electric Vehicle Public Charging Infrastructure. Gunnar Lorenz Head of Unit, Networks EURELECTRIC

subtitel SmartSec 2014 Jan Paul Buijs Mgr CIO Office Enexis

USAID Distributed PV Building Blocks

Veridian s Perspectives of Distributed Energy Resources

Frequency-Regulation Reserves by DERs: barriers to entry and options for their resolution. Olivier BORNE - Marc PETIT - Yannick PEREZ

Measuring the Smartness of the Electricity Grid

SUITABLE NETWORK TARIFF DESIGN FOR THE GRID INTEGRATION OF DECENTRALIZED GENERATION AND STORAGE

5 th NEAESF. Outline

19 September

Challenges of decarbonisation to the electricity grid: demand side flexibility and distribution network issues

Highlights of EU efforts for Smart Grids deployment and the way forward

NOBEL GRID & WISEGRID projects - Clean energy for All. Aris Dimeas National Technical University of Athens

Universal Smart Energy Framework

Smart Grid 2.0: Moving Beyond Smart Meters

Presentation of the European Electricity Grid Initiative

DG system integration in distribution networks. The transition from passive to active grids

DSM from distribution customers: From an increasing reality today in MV to perspectives tomorrow in LV

Spreading Innovation for the Power Sector Transformation Globally. Amsterdam, 3 October 2017

Electric Power Engineering, Chalmers

Application of Cost-Effective Grid-Scale Battery Storage as an Enabler of Network Integration of Renewable Energy

Unlocking the value of consumer flexibility. Creating sustainable value from connecting homes PassivSystems Limited

Layered Energy System

RES integration into energy system

The active consumer - a key player to unlock a carbon free future

An Architectural View of Emerging Changes to the Grid

Utility Rate Design for Solar PV Customers

THE ADVANCED SMART GRID

A Swiss perspective of DSM for electricity networks -Overview of ongoing projects - Dr. Matthias Galus, Dep. Head Networks

Nordic co-operation when meeting System challenges

The Smart Grid by Siemens.

Basic tariff guiding principles

The Old Gray Grid She Ain t What She Used to Be Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

DNV GL Energy Transition Outlook 2018 and our services related to electric mobility

Spreading Innovation for the Power Sector Transformation Globally. Amsterdam, 3 October 2017

European Integrated Research Programme on Smart Grids

Grid modernization: Incorporating smart technologies

Good Practices for Grid Connection: European Wind Industry perspective. Iván Pineda EWEA Research Officer Grids and Internal Electricity Market

Virtual Power Plants Realising the value of distributed storage systems through and aggregation and integration

Smart grid. Social risks, benefits, opportunities. Pankaj Batra Member (Planning), Central Electricity Authority

Net Metering Policy Framework. July 2015

Building Smart Grid with µems CEZ Spring Conference, 16 th -17 th April 2014 Igor Dremelj, VP Smart Grid Solutions EMEA

Evaluation and modelling of demand and generation at distribution level for Smart grid implementation

How to incentivise the efficient deployment of electric vehicles

The (r)evolutionary role of the DSO

Future Aspects for DSO in Austria. Conference on the Electric Distribution Network of Slovenia

Solar Project Development in Regulated Markets. Smart and Sustainable Campuses Conference 2017

GRID CONNECTION OF POWER GENERATING FACILITIES. FEBEG POSITION Elia WG Belgian Grid ( )

Electric Vehicles as a Grid Resource Lessons Learned for Driving Value from EV Charging Programs

Harnessing Demand Flexibility. Match Renewable Production

The role of Energy Storage and Demand Side Management in Smart Grid Optimisation: Community led projects in the Scottish Islands

Implementing Net Metering to Meet Policy Objectives

RENAULT, PIONEERING THE ELECTRIC REVOLUTION

November 11, 2016 Patra, Greece

POLICY GUIDELINES by the Energy Community Secretariat

Project introduction

Smart Rate Design for a Smart Future

Designing retail electricity tariffs for a successful Energy Union

Smart Micro Grids and Cellular Grids

PV reaching socket parity Policy implications for distributed generation. Cédric Philibert, Simon Müller, Hoël Wiesner Renewable Energy Division

Enel Group today Evolution and achievements since /31/ GW % additional capacity mn end users +8.4 mn smart meters 3

Designing Distributed Generation Tariffs Well

Smart Grid Implementation Strategies. Ray Gogel February 2010

Solar Development in New Jersey, and PV Impacts on the Distribution System Carnegie Mellon Conference on the Electricity Industry - March 9, 2011

Efficiency Challenges for the European Utilities A view from Enel

Flexibility Beyond the hype

Economics of Vehicle to Grid

Electricity Trends in Pennsylvania

Smart Grids in the Developing World. Dr. Rahul Tongia CSTEP Sept. 29, 2010

State Policies - Distributed Energy Resources

Smart grids: how do we get there?

Energy Management Through Peak Shaving and Demand Response: New Opportunities for Energy Savings at Manufacturing and Distribution Facilities

DISTRIBUTED SOLAR+STORAGE PROBLEM STATEMENT. A.F.Mensah, Inc

Planning and Cost Allocation in the 21 st Century: The Black Sheep or the Crown Jewel of the Electric Industry

Proposal Concerning Modifications to LIPA s Tariff for Electric Service

10 Th Urban Mobility Conference / CODATU XVII Innovative Funding For Urban Mobility Case study: RATP & Ile-de France mobility

Demand Charges to Deal With Net Energy Metering: Key Considerations

Tariff Design Issues: Approaches for Recovering Grid and System Costs

Renewables in Transport (RETRANS)

P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION

What, Why, and Where? Brian Lips Senior Project Manager for Policy NC Clean Energy Technology Center

Outline. European Power System context. RES & Smart Grids. Highlighted projects. Conclusion & Discussion

Transcription:

Challenges for Electricity Distribution Tariff Design in the Smart Grid era: A Conceptual Approach Cherrelle Eid c.eid@tudelft.nl Supervisor: Tutors: Promotor: Rudi Hakvoort Javier Reneses & Pablo Frias (Comillas), Yannick Perez (Paris-Sud 11) Margot Weijnen 1

Dynamic Tariffs Home Energy Management Cost reduction Prosumers Aggregators Energy Service Companies (ESCOs) Local Storage Home Automation Bi-directional electricity flows Telecom Operators Virtual Power Plants (VPP) Demand Response Smart Grids? Electric Vehicles Smart Devices Reliable Electricity Supply Electricity Affordability Smart Meters Distributed Generation Renewable Energy Sources (RES) Smart Cities Isolated Systems CO2 Emission Reduction 2

A Smart Grid as container concept: 1. Is a marketing strategy (called framing in Process Management) Smart Grids are apparently better than Non-Smart-Grids Smart appears to improve system Environmentally, Economically and Technically 2. Vagueness of such concept: Helps find common grounds between actors to initiate interaction and implementation 3

My research: defining the Smart Grid concept and consequences for Energy Policy objectives Smart Grid Network and Retail Tariffs Net- Metering methods Demand Response Load Aggregation Sociotechnical context (market design) 4

Why (distribution) tariff design important? Smart Grid changes are mostly tangible at distribution level 5

Dynamic Tariffs Home Energy Management Cost reduction Prosumers Aggregators Energy Service Companies (ESCOs) Local Storage Home Automation Bi-directional electricity flows Telecom Operators Virtual Power Plants (VPP) Demand Response Smart Grids? Electric Vehicles Distributed Generation Smart Devices Reliable Electricity Supply Electricity Affordability Smart Meters Renewable Energy Sources (RES) Smart Cities Isolated Systems CO2 Emission Reduction 6

Why (distribution) tariff design important? Smart Grid changes are mostly tangible at distribution level Demand response (DR) major justification for Smart Grid investments DR would lead to reduced grid investment DR would support higher DG penetration levels DR would increase efficiency of entire system Dynamic tariffs are seen as the major driver behind Demand Response However, deciding on tariffs is complex... Which way to go? 7

Presentation Outline 1. Network Tariff design fundamentals 2. A regulators perspective 3. Tariffs as a tool 4. Combining tariff options 5. Location dependency 6. Challenges for tariff design 8

Tariff Design from a Policy Perspective Electricity Network is a natural monopoly DSO = Distribution System Operator Cost-causality : the user charge is reflective of the costs that the user caused to the grid. 9

1. Network Tariff design fundamentals Basic tariff fundamentals: Revenue sufficiency economic efficiency Equity Non-discrimination Transparency Simplicity Stability Additivity Additionally now: Cost Causality Sustainability targets like DG and EV penetration (Berg and Tschirhart, 1989; Green and Pardina, 1999; Leveque, 2003; Reneses and Rodríguez, 2013) 10

Objectives for Network Tariff Design from the perspective of the Distribution System Operator? Objectives for Network Tariff Design from the Regulators perspective? 11

2. Network Tariff design from the Regulators perspective Regulator Objectives for the DSO Quality of Supply Cost Efficiency Sustainability Continuity of Supply Voltage Quality Commercial Quality of Service Cost Recovery Minimize OPEX Minimize CAPEX Reduce losses Decrease CO 2 emissions Increase DG/EV penetration Increase Energy Efficiency Increase Demand Side Response 12

2.2 Tariff design from a Regulators Perspective 13

3. Tariffs as a tool Behavior Factors of the Network Users Price exposure Dispatch Margins for DSM Price Signal Options Price Elasticity Willingness to react Dispatch margin Dispatch Margin for Production Charging (-) Penalizing (--) Dispatchability Dispatch Margin for Consumption Incentivizing(++) Automation Capability to React Appliances Owned Remunerating (+) Capacity 14

3. Tariffs as a tool: Options for different Tariff Components 15

Energy charging often applied Except Netherlands Eurelectric 2013 16

4. Combined options: Cost drivers with time and/or location dependency 17

5. Location dependency Both Long-Run-Incremental-Cost (LRIC) and Incremental Cost related pricing (ICRP) could be adequate methods to yield locational messages for network users ICRP = incremental cost related pricing Applied in the UK for transmission charging. A method that assumes a fully utilized network, therefore any additional power transaction will require immediate network reinforcement. When applied, these type of tariffs immediately deliver strong signals to network users and are therefore useful for direct behavior modification. 18

5.2 Location dependency LRIC long run incremental cost pricing, (Li, 2007). Accounts the deterred or acceleration of required network investment in the future due to current network utilization. In comparison with ICRP, this type of pricing method delivers more realistic but weaker pricing signals to network users. 19

5.2 Location dependency: The flip-over from credit to charge For the penetration of DG, both ICRP and LRIC deliver a credit for DG owners if electricity inflows lead to a satisfaction of local demand. However, when this local production surpasses demand, the credit flips into a cost. ( ) Discourages the settlement of new generation units and owners with DG units that are already settled in such location. Especially this latter issue leads to disapproval of such pricing methods taking into account network users inflexibility to alter their location. 20

6. Challenges for Tariff design Deciding on distribution tariffs 1. Costs for activating demand response VS (financial) benefits and achieved policy objectives 2. Tariff variability VS network user inflexibility 3. Tariff variability VS inelasticity of network users 4. Dynamic pricing VS network user privacy 5. Distribution need for DSM VS limited impact of distribution cost on final customer bills 21

6.2 Challenges for Tariff design Level of needed tariff complexity? 22

Thank you for your attention! Contact: C.Eid@tudelft.nl 23