ULSFO (0.10) and RM (VLSFO) Category Potential future trends

Similar documents
LSFO (0.10%) Chris Fisher Mobile: Brookes Bell Group

Changing Scene of Marine Fuel Quality

Index 1. ISO 8217 :

GUIDELINES FOR USE OF LOW SULPHUR FUEL OILS IN SHIPS

Our reputation is the wheel of our success.

Bunker Fuel Quality: 2020 Outlook North of England P&I Athens, November

all engines Diesel engine fuels Issue

Meeting ECA requirements a new challenge & a new opportunity

Marine Fuels & Environment

CIMAC Position Paper

Working together for a safer world

Bunkering With New Fuels Building on Strong Foundations.

Sampling & Test Accuracy under the umbrella of emissions legislation

ISO 8217 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Petroleum products Fuels (class F) Specifications of marine fuels

ISO Petroleum products Fuels (class F) Specifications of marine fuels

New Regulatory Environment

White paper. MARPOL Annex VI fuel strategies and their influence on combustion in boilers

Cylinder Condition. What will the future bring. 07 November 2018

Standardized Bunker Supplier Accreditation Scheme to Enhance Marine Environmental Protection in SOMS

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. Oct Applicability: All Brightoil clients ISO 8217:2010 VS ISO 8217:2010 Major Changes

Workshop on GHG Emission On Ships Co-organised by CIL and MPA

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.119/Amend.1 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.119/Amend.1

Fuel oils Specification

ISO 8217 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Petroleum products Fuels (class F) Specifications of marine fuels

ISO 8217:2010 Dr.r.Vis, Viswa Lab

Marine fuels in the low-sulphur era

COLOMBIA. 2. Vehicle categories: 2.1. Categories for application with European limits. M = Passenger vehicle N = Commercial vehicle

Emerging Environmental Rules & ECA Compliance

Supply of Services for Detailed OEB Crude Assay Analysis

The Nautical Institute

IEA Bioenergy ExCo78 workshop Biofuel supply to Interislander

Bunkers. KIVI 30 oct 2012 Anton Spierings (VNPI)

Global Greenship, September 2009 Low Sulfur Fuel and Emissions Advances

REBCO (RUSSIAN EXPORT BLEND CRUDE OIL) SPECIFICATION GOST

MARITIME GLOBAL SULPHUR CAP. Know the different choices and challenges for on-time compliance SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

Emissions regulation compliance and low sulphur fuels

FUEL LUBE OIL. and. By Charlotte Røjgaard MAN Diesel. MAN Diesel / Charlotte Røjgaard MAN Diesel A/S 1

Changes in Bunker Fuel Quality Impact on European and Russian Refiners

Desulphurizing Bunker Fuel/HFO Utilizing IUT Technology

Desulphurizing Marine Fuel/HFO Utilizing IUT Technology. November 19, 2017 International Ultrasonic Technologies Inc.

MARINE FUEL OIL ADVISORY ABS MARINE FUEL OIL ADVISORY 2018 i. Alex Kolokythas/Shutterstock

25 th May 2018 Prague. MSAR Technology - Emulsion Fuel for Power Generation, Marine Bunkers & Refinery Uses

15 th November 2017 Athens. MSAR Technology - Emulsion Fuel for Power Generation, Marine Bunkers & Refinery Uses

FUEL QUALITY TESTING YOUR FUEL MANAGEMENT PARTNER

Bunker Claims. How an Engine Works. How an Engine Works. Alex Macinnes Sept 2018

Neste. Cimac Cascades 2017 Helsinki. Teemu Sarjovaara, D.Sc.(Tech) Neste R&D, Products

Alternative fuels and abatement technology for future shipping an overview

Assessment of Fuel Oil Availability. Jasper Faber, The Hague, 3 October 2016

SHIP OPERATIONS COOPERATIVE PROGRAM

Case study -MARPOL emission standards ECA Compliance. Your Trusted Partner

International Quality Assurance Exchange Program Schedule. Fuel Month Number Type Dispatch Date Closing Date

2020 Sulphur Cap. Challenges and Opportunities. Delivering Maritime Solutions.

Marine Fuel Solutions. 5 th European Bunker Fuels Conference Rotterdam May 2014 Chris Turner Group Technical Manager

Fuel Related Definitions

EffShip. Love Hagström D.E.C. Marine AB

Low sulphur bunker fuel oil : what are the options?

INTERTANKO Documentary Committee Bunker 2020

Container MBW12K90MC Thursday 25 Jan 2007

DEVELOPMENT OF DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR CONSISTENT IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION OF MARPOL ANNEX VI

Residual Fuel Market Issues

MAN Diesel & Turbo SE Exhaust gas emissions & solutions

"Exhaust Gas Scrubbers Abatement System as an Alternative under IMO MARPOL Annex VI''

Refining impact of the IMO bunker fuel sulphur decision

IMO 2020 Minimizing operational risks due to compliance. Sachin Gupta Business Manager Water & Oil Solutions

LNG. DME Ethane. Coal Slurry MSAR. Biofuel ULSFO (Ultra Low Sulphur Fuel Oil) Methanol Glycerine Hydrogen

GUIDANCE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SHIP IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE CONSISTENT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 0.50% SULPHUR LIMIT UNDER MARPOL ANNEX VI

Bunker Fuel Quality Management Today & Tomorrow

ECO optimization with NOx equipment

26th September 2018 IRPC - Houston

The European Fuels Conference

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

ASTM #2 Diesel Fuel Sample ID: DF21210

Clean Marine one fuel, all sources, all 1me! Tuzla Jan Fredrik Gulbrandsen

products 22 º C Ventilation Air Conditioning Refrigeration MGO Cooler - The reliable solution towards lower sulphur emissions Inside

Production of Biodiesel from Used Groundnut Oil from Bosso Market, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria

BC control options reduction technologies

USE OF MDO BY SHIPS THE RATIONAL BEHIND THE PROPOSAL

Crude Assay Report. Crude Oil sample marked. Barrow Crude Oil. On Behalf Of. Chevron Australia Pty Ltd. Laboratory Supervisor. Crude Assay Chemist

Ship Energy Efficiency and Air Pollution. Ernestos Tzannatos Department of Maritime Studies University of Piraeus

Marine Bunkers 2020 & Beyond

Marine Fuel Management. Mark Pearson ASGL Marine Fuel Manager Athens, 9 April 2014

Bunker Summit Greece. Monique Vermeire Athens. 10 May, 2007

THE IMPACT OF REGULATIONS ON MARINE FUEL QUALITY

Recent and current developments in the regulation of air pollution from ships

The Future of Bunker testing; Real Time Quality Monitoring ARACON 2007

Two stroke engines for different fuels and reduction of exhaust gas emission.

Recommendation for petroleum fuel treatment systems for marine diesel engines

Government Notices

ANNEX 2, REFERENCE FUELS

ENVIRONMENT. The Diesel Engine and the Environment

MARTOB Application of low sulphur marine fuels New challenges for the Marine Industry. Kjell Olav Skjølsvik MARINTEK

Outlook for Marine Bunkers and Fuel Oil to 2025 Sourcing Lower Sulphur Products

The road leading to the 0.50% sulphur limit and IMO s role moving forward

Global Sulfur Cap

2020 Fuel Oil Sulphur Cap. Stamford, CT March 12, North American Panel Mee1ng. Interna1onal Associa1on of Independent Tanker Owners


ANNEX 3 REFERENCE FUELS. Parameter Unit Limits (1) Test method Minimum Maximum Research octane number, RON

A multi-fuel future: the impact of the IMO sulphur cap

Fuel handling. in Emission Controlled Areas

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Transcription:

ULSFO (0.10) and RM (VLSFO) Category Potential future trends Douglas Raitt Regional Marine Consultancy Manager Working together for a safer world

Revised MARPOL Annex VI - Methods for compliance SOx NOx Primary Secondary (HFO+) Primary Secondary Distillates Wet scrubber LNG SCR New fuel blends Open loop (seawater) EGR LNG Closed-loop (freshwater & chemical) Common rail Bio fuels/gases Hybrid (open/closed switchable) Variable inlet closing Methanol/ DMEe Dry scrubber Fuel emulsification., air humidification, direct water injection Other? Non-thermal plasma Other? Source: sea-cargo.no Other?

Reducing Marine SOx Emissions: An Inter-Industry challenge Refineries need significant investment to fully deliver compliant fuel post 2020/2025 Up to 2015 Fuels been delivered with the conventional production methods Post 1 Jan 2015 and up to 2020/2025 Increasing pressures on supply Competition with land based distillate pool New refinery streams for 0.10% RM grades From 2020/2025 VLSFO 0.50% RM grades of fuel, price and quality Outlet for residual fuels EGCS uptake S>3.5% to be monitored

Increase demand for Distillates and ULSF Residuals Source: Marine and Energy Consulting Limited Global emissions legislation resulting in increased demand for distillates between now and 2020 The grades demanded are ISO 8217 for sulphur content of 0.10%: DMA/Z DMB RMA The scope for new RM grades was not fully realised until 2014: The engines most impacted burn residual fuel All that is required is: S 0.10% and RMG /K compliant fuel 2018?

2015 ULSFO (<0.10%) - 5 Categories 1. Ultra Low Sulphur Residual Fuel Oil 2. Blends of Distillate + small amounts of residual fuel oil 3. Heavy distillates, fuels with low metal content but with higher viscosity than conventional DMA CIMAC Working Group 7 - Fuels (International Council on Combustion Engines) Convention for low sulphur fuel oils: LSFO = 1.0% VLSFO = 0.50% ULSFO = 0.10% Each may include any of the 5 categories of fuel composition 4. Distillates DMB and DMA 5. Alternative fuels and power sources

ULSFO Typical Given Specifications from October 2012 Supplier Product Name / Characteris tic Vis cos ity 50 C (40C) Unit Exxon Chemoil Ceps a BP CHemoil Chemoil Shell Lukoil Mobil 0.10% S 0.10% S 0.10% S DMB BP 0.1 Mexico/ New York Shell DMB LS 0.1% RMD Hous ton /Savannah ULSFO Eco Marine HDME-50 Fuel (DMB) (RMD80) (RMG380) Exxon SK ISO 8217 ISO 8217 ISO 8217 Mobil Energy 2012 2012 2012 AFME SK DMB RMD 80 RMG 380 200 ULSFO cst (10.5) (11) 6-13 16.84 26.3 10-60 40-70 65 (max) 67 30-40 (11) /(2) 80 380 Dens ity 15 C Kg/m³ 885 900 850-890 859 896 790-910 895-915 910 917 928 900 975 991 Sulphur mass% 0.085 0.1 0.1 0.084 0.1 <0.1 0.1 0.095 <0.1 0.1 2 790- CCAI 760-820 795 800 795-810 860 799 800 Cetane Index 40 35 860 870 Flash Point C 70 60 60 79 >65.5 60 70 60 >70 70 60 60 60 H2S mass% 0.1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 Acid Number mgkoh/g 0.1 0.5 2.5 2.35 0.5 0.1 2.5 <0.1 0.5 2.5 2.5 TSA (TSE) mass% -0.05 0.1 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.01-0.05 0.01 0.1 0.02 (0.1) 0.1 0.1 Carbon Residue mass% 0.1 0.3 4 <0.10 3.8 2 0.3 14 <10 6 0.3 14 18 Pour point C -4 6 27-20 -6 18 15-30 20 (max) 0 20-25 6 30 30 Water volume% 0.05 0.3 0.3 0.05 0.05 0.1 <0.5 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 Ash mass% 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.003 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.07 <0.1 0.05 0.01 0.07 0.1 Vanadium mass% 50 <1 <1 2 1 2 1 0.7 150 350 Sodium mass% 50 4 1 10 1 2 5 2 100 100 Aluminium mass% <1 <5 15 Silicon mass% 2 <5 2 10 to Al +Si mass% 5 25 3 <10 0.3 20 Calcium mass% 13 175 30 <1 30 5 40 60 Zinc mass% 2 <1 15 <1 15 1 Phosphorus mass% 7 <1 15 15 Lubricity (WSD) µm 310 520 520 520 GSE MJ/Kg 45.2 Appearance Not C and B Not C and B Not C and B Black

ULSMFO - Characteristics - DM to RM Grades (FOBAS global data May March 2015 ) Categories 3 2 1 Test Units Min Ave Max Diff. DEN15 kg/l 0.8376 0.8934 0.9589 0.12 KV50 cst 2.6 25.3 83.6 81 KV40 cst 11.3 ASH % m/m <0.01 0.02 0.09 0.09 Sulphur % m/m <0.01 0.09 0.14 Water % V/V 0.00 0.02 0.35 Pour Point oc -13 12 30 43 Micro Carbon Residue % m/m 0.00 2.04 10.53 10.53 Net Calorific Value Mj/kg 41.57 42.46 43.16 1.59 CCAI N/A 751 799 868 117 Silicon + Aluminium mg/kg 0 5 58 58 Calcium mg/kg 0 24 185 185 Vanadium mg/kg 0 2 123 123 Nickel Lloyd s Register GMT Ltd - FOBAS mg/kg 0 14 69 69 Key Operational Properties Viscosity + Density Ignition quality Catfines and sediment Compatibility and stability Pour Point / Cold Flow Sulphur Lubricity(DM) NCV

ULSFO New Dimension of fuels - FOBAS Test Data 70 60 50 Compatibility concerns Segregation Cold Flow properties Heating requirements Varying characteristics 40 30 20 10 K Viscosity at 50oC Micro Carbon Residue Net Specific Energy Gross Specific Energy Sulphur Content Pour Point Aluminium + Silicon 0 Running title <set on slide master>

Hybrid fuels - Cold Flow properties High paraffinic content compromised cold flow properties Pour Point only is not enough Ask for CFPP / Cloud Point operational constraints? Pour Point vs CFPP

Distillate Cloud Point and Cold Filter Plugging Point Case Ship reported MGO purifier sludge build up at discharge port Heated to 28 deg C Ambient 24 deg C Cloudy Crystals Heated to 28 deg C Clear Pour Point -19 deg C

Compatibility and Stability Operations Individual stability generally satisfactory High risk of incompatibility with other RFOs Oxidation stability (where applicable) satisfactory (DM) Total Sediments (where applicable) satisfactory But thermal loading? Fuel ageing? Load in empty tanks Carry out compatibility test Always monitor filter loading during change over Lloyd s Register GMT Ltd - FOBAS

Investigation of compatibility HDME50 and IFO 380 HSFO (FOBAS lab tests) - Avoid mixing - If mixing is unavoidable then percentage of HDME-50 should be kept below 10% Unstable fuel oil Lloyd s Register GMT Ltd - FOBAS

Thank you Questions? Douglas Raitt Regional Consultancy Manager Lloyd s Register Asia T +65 9137 8515 E douglas.raitt@lr.org Working together for a safer world Lloyd s Register and variants of it are trading names of Lloyd s Register Group Limited, its subsidiaries and affiliates. Copyright Lloyd s Register Lloyd s GMT Register Ltd - FOBAS Group Limited. 2015. A member of the Lloyd s Register group.