Power Technology Branch Army Power Division US Army RDECOM CERDEC C2D Fort Belvoir, Virginia

Similar documents
U.S. Army/CERDEC's Portable Fuel Cell Evaluation and Field Testing 2011 Fuel Cell Seminar & Expo Orlando, FL 31 Oct 2011

TARDEC Technology Integration

Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Non-primary Power Systems Overview Kevin Centeck and Darin Kowalski 10 Aug 2011

TARDEC --- TECHNICAL REPORT ---

Robot Drive Motor Characterization Test Plan

Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells

US ARMY POWER OVERVIEW

Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A. Approved for Public Release TACOM Case # 21906, 26 May Vehicle Electronics and Architecture

TARDEC Robotics. Dr. Greg Hudas UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Track & Suspension Overview Mr. Jason Alef & Mr. Geoff Bossio 11 Aug 2011

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Energy Storage Requirements & Challenges For Ground Vehicles

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Energy Storage Overview Mr. David Skalny & Dr. Laurence Toomey 10 August 2011

US Army CERDEC: Fuel Cell Testing Update

Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Command (TARDEC) Overview

TARDEC OVERVIEW. Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center. APTAC Spring Conference Detroit 27 March, 2007

Alternative Fuels: FT SPK and HRJ for Military Use

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

Feeding the Fleet. GreenGov Washington D.C. October 31, 2011

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4

EXPLORATORY DISCUSSIONS - PRE DECISIONAL

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 3

2011 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 9-11 DEARBORN, MICHIGAN

High efficiency variable speed versatile power air conditioning system for military vehicles

GM-TARDEC Autonomous Safety Collaboration Meeting

TARDEC Hybrid Electric Program Last Decade

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Servicing Hawker Vehicle Batteries with Standard Battery Charging and Test Equipment

UNCLASSIFIED: DIST A. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. ARMY GREATEST INVENTIONS CY 2009 PROGRAM MRAP Overhead Wire Mitigation (OWM) Kit

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

Evaluation of Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL) Candidates for Fuel Consumption Benefits in Military Equipment

Open & Evolutive UAV Architecture

AFRL-RX-TY-TM

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Power Requirements

Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System. Auto-ACAS. Mark A. Skoog Dryden Flight Research Center - NASA. AutoACAS. Dryden Flight Research Center

FTTS Utility Vehicle UV2 Concept Review FTTS UV2 Support Variant

An Advanced Fuel Filter

INTELLIGENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN A TWO POWER-BUS VEHICLE SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE

US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations. Major Robert Kent, USAF, MC, SFS

Presented by Mr. Greg Kilchenstein OSD, Maintenance. 29August 2012

Up-Coming Diesel Fuel and Exhaust Emissions Regulations For Mobile Sources. Parminder Khabra RDECOM-TARDEC TACOM LCMC March 22, 2006 JSEM

Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel January 25, 2006 Hilton San Diego Resort 1775 East Mission Bay Drive San Diego, CA 92109

DESULFURIZATION OF LOGISTIC FUELS FOR FUEL CELL APUs

Helicopter Dynamic Components Project. Presented at: HCAT Meeting January 2006

Evaluation of Digital Refractometers for Field Determination of FSII Concentration in JP-5 Fuel

HIGH REPETITION RATE CHARGING A MARX TYPE GENERATOR *

Navy Coalescence Test on Petroleum F-76 Fuel with Infineum R655 Lubricity Improver at 300 ppm

LESSONS LEARNED WHILE MEASURING FUEL SYSTEM DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MARK HEATON AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 10 MAY 2011

Monolithically Integrated Micro Flapping Vehicles

DSCC Annual Tire Conference CATL UPDATE. March 24, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

Dual Use Ground Vehicle Condition-Based Maintenance Project B

Hydro-Piezoelectricity: A Renewable Energy Source For Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

Navy Coalescence Test on Camelina HRJ5 Fuel

Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards VHG Labs Inc. Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100 and D12-XXX Series Standards

Does V50 Depend on Armor Mass?

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Predator B: The Multi-Role UAV

TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS ON A FUSELAGE-LIKE TEST SETUP AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF APERTURES

Fuel Efficient ground vehicle Demonstrator (FED) Vision

F100 ENGINE NACELLE FIRE FIGHTING TEST MOCKUP DRAWINGS

Robust Fault Diagnosis in Electric Drives Using Machine Learning

Application of Airbag Technology for Vehicle Protection

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

Program Overview. Chris Mocnik Robotic Vehicle Control Architecture for FCS ATO Manager U.S. Army RDECOM TARDEC

Multilevel Vehicle Design: Fuel Economy, Mobility and Safety Considerations, Part B

The Current Status of Fuel Cell Technologies for Portable Military Applications

Center for Ground Vehicle Development and Integration

Quarterly Progress Report

ITC-Germany Visit. Chuck Coutteau, Associate Director Ground Vehicle Power and Mobility Overview 10 November 2011

NoFoam Unit Installation, Evaluation and Operations Manual

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards SCP Science (Conostan) Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100, and D12-XXX Series Standards

Hybrid Components: Motors and Power Electronics

GVSET Power & Energy Preview Mr. Chuck Coutteau Associate Director (Acting) Ground Vehicle Power & Mobility 19 August 2009

Additives to Increase Fuel Heat Sink Capacity

CERDEC Fuel Cell Team: Military Transitions for Soldier Fuel Cells

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

NDCEE National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

INLINE MONITORING OF FREE WATER AND PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION OF JET A FUEL

Predator Program Office

Portable Fluid Analyzer

Battery Research & Development Need for Military Vehicle Application

IMPACT OF FRICTION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON FUEL ECONOMY FOR GROUND VEHICLES G. R. Fenske, R. A. Erck, O. O. Ajayi, A. Masoner, and A. S.

Membrane Wing Aerodynamics for µav Applications

DEVELOPMENT OF COMPACT VARIABLE- VOLTAGE, BI-DIRECTIONAL 100KW DC-DC CONVERTER

A Cultural Shift in Fuel Sources for Man Portable Power

Impact of 200 ppm HiTEC 4898C Lubricity Improver Additive (LIA) on F-76 Fuel Coalescence

Crew integration & Automation Testbed and Robotic Follower Programs

Man-Packable Power Systems An Assessment of Alternative Fuel Cells (Current and Future Technologies) Joint Service Power Expo

Reducing Warfighter Load by Increasing Energy Density

Future Trends and Thrusts for Army Manportable Power Sources

Endurance Testing of Redesigned Tab Spring for MI-RAMS System

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release.

A GENERAL PURPOSE VEHICLE POWERTRAIN MODELING AND SIMULATION SOFTWARE - VPSET

Transcription:

Power Technology Branch Army Power Division US Army RDECOM CERDEC C2D Fort Belvoir, Virginia APPT TR 06 01 Smart Fuel Cell C20-MP Hybrid Fuel Cell Power Source 42 nd Power Sources Conference: Smart Fuel Cell C20-MP Hybrid Fuel Cell Power Source Pavel Fomin and Elizabeth Bostic UNCLASSIFIED UNLIMITED DISTRIBUTION Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. APPT TR 06 01 AMSRD-CER-C2-AP-PT

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 12 JUN 2006 2. REPORT TYPE Final Technical Report 3. DATES COVERED 01-06-2005 to 12-06-2006 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 42nd Power Sources Conference Smart Fuel Cell C20-MP Hybrid Fuel Cell Power Source 6. AUTHOR(S) Pavel Fomin; Elizabeth Bostic 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. ARMY COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING CENTER,10125 Gratiot Rd.,Suite 100,Fort Belvoir,VA,22060-5816 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. ARMY COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING CENTER, 10125 Gratiot Rd., Suite 100, Fort Belvoir, VA, 22060-5816 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) AMSRD-CER-C2-AP-PT 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) APPT-TR-06-01 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT The SFC C20-MP now utilizes fourth generation conductive membrane technology in order to both increase system power density and mitigate the effects of methanol crossover across the DMFC membranes. Upon delivery of the upgraded units, CERDEC performed a series of test regimes to determine the operational capabilities of the C20-MP including fuel efficiency and power energy density. These tests confirmed that the C20-MP units are capable of achieving net system efficiencies as high as 21% based on the LHV of methanol. Testing also showed that the SFC systems were capable of providing upwards of 20 Watts of net continuous power at a power density of 10.25 Watts/kg. The calculated system energy density is 420Whrs/kg for a 72 hour, 20 Watt mission. The rest of this paper will discuss the results and findings in greater detail. 15. SUBJECT TERMS direct methanol fuel cell ; DMFC ; test and evaluation ; U.S. Army research ; soldier power ; fuel cells 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 5 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Smart Fuel Cell C20-MP Hybrid Fuel Cell Power Source Pavel Fomin and Elizabeth Bostic U.S. Army Research, Development, and Engineering Command Communications Electronics Research, Development. Engineering Center; Power Technology Branch Fuel Cell Technology Team 10125 Gratiot Road, Suite 100 Fort Belvoir, VA 22060 pavel.fomin@armypower.army.mil Abstract The Communications Electronics Research Development and Engineering Center s (CERDEC) Army Power Division initiated a system development program with Smart Fuel Cell (SFC) in 2003. At that time, CERDEC took delivery of the SFC A25 unit capable of producing a continuous power output of 25 watts with a system efficiency of 13%. Based on that effort, CERDEC awarded another contract and in 2004 received the SFC C25 system. Like the A25, this unit continuously produced a 25 watt power output but reduced the system weight by 83%. In 2005, SFC delivered two of its second generation 20W Hybrid Fuel Cell Power Sources (SFC C20-MP) to CERDEC for preliminary test and evaluation purposes. Initial test results of the C20-MP showed a 19% efficiency and a calculated system energy density of 400 Whrs/kg. In order to improve system performance, CERDEC funded a system upgrade which included the integration of next generation fuel cell membranes. The upgraded system incorporates state-of-the-art direct methanol fuel cell technology. The SFC C20-MP now utilizes fourth generation conductive membrane technology in order to both increase system power density and mitigate the effects of methanol crossover across the DMFC membranes. Upon delivery of the upgraded units, CERDEC performed a series of test regimes to determine the operational capabilities of the C20-MP including fuel efficiency and power energy density. These tests confirmed that the C20-MP units are capable of achieving net system efficiencies as high as 21% based on the LHV of methanol. Testing also showed that the SFC systems were capable of providing upwards of 20 Watts of net continuous power at a power density of 10.25 Watts/kg. The calculated system energy density is 420Whrs/kg for a 72 hour, 20 Watt mission. The rest of this paper will discuss the results and findings in greater detail. Background In June of 2002, the Department of the Army created Program Executive Office (PEO) Soldier. The primary purpose of this organization is to develop and field the best possible equipment for today s Soldier. To accomplish this task, a new and innovative approach was used that involved looking at the modern soldier as a system and ensuring that all equipment the Soldier used and carried on battle field worked together as part of an integrated system. Transforming the Soldier into a system involves integrating many advanced electronic devices that consequently created a high demand for primary and rechargeable batteries. Providing power for this equipment created a heavy burden on the dismounted Soldier and significantly reduced the Soldier s fighting capability. Power sources make up a big significant percentage of weight carried by the Soldier. As an example, the battery weight associated for a 24 hour mission of a typical Dismounted Battle Combat Soldier (DBCS), could amount to as much as 17% of the overall weight. The future Soldier will be electronic and the overall power demand is expected to increase. In the near future, it is possible that batteries will not be able to meet the high power requirements and for this reason CERDEC has been developing advanced high energy density power sources. Introduction To ease the logistics burden and meet the demand of reliable high energy density light weight power, CERDEC s Fuel Cell Technology Team has been evaluating fuel cell power sources from various commercial vendors. One of these vendors has been Smart Fuel Cell (SFC) of Brunnthal-Nord, Germany. Since 2003, CERDEC has had ongoing contracts with SFC to develop a lightweight, silent, Direct Methanol Fuel Cell (DMFC) system capable of sustaining soldier power demand in the 20 watt range. The first unit, the A25, was a 25 watt hybrid fuel cell weighing 10 kg. Although not practical for military operations, the A25 provided valuable insight into fuel cell design and was used as the basis for SFC s next generation unit, the C25. This unit had a dry weight of 1.7 kg and provided an 83%

weight reduction while at the same time doubling the energy density. SFC then took this one step further and developed the C20-MP with Gen IV technology. C20-MP w/ Gen IV Technology The C20-MP is a 20 watt hybrid DMFC system with a dry weight of 1.9 kg and a calculated energy density of 430 W-hr/kg for a 72 hour operational cycle. Because power is trasmitted through an internal rechargeable battery, the unit is capable of producing instant power at the switch of a button. However, the fuel cell, which charges the internal battery, has a start time of approximately 1.5 minutes; it is at this time that the unit is fully operational. The C20-MP comes with advanced system level functions such as status display, error display and operational mode. System Specifications The C20MP is a complete packaged system capable of providing instant power. Figure 1 shows the various system features. ensure accuracy as well as adherence to testing procedure. The twelve individual tests can be grouped into the following four main categories: Fuel Consumption, Electrical Characterization, Orientation, and Environmental Testing. Data was logged both manually and electronically to prevent data loss. Testing Results Summary Two (2) C20MP units, and, were evaluated for a combined total of 580 hours at CERDEC. Testing results showed a peak efficiency of 21% at a 20 watt load and a fuel consumption rate of 19.88 ml/hour. The units are capable of producing a peak power output of 35 watts for three (3) minutes. Successful startup was demonstrated at 1 C and the unit was shown to operate up to a temperature of 40 C before being shut off by an internal safety control mechanism. The units are capable of being operated upright, 90 incline backwards, and 45 in the left or right direction without any operational degradation. Noise emission was in line with SFC claims ranging from 47-50 db(a) at a one meter distance. Testing Results Efficiency Overall, both units peaked at a 21% efficiency at full rated power. Figure 2 shows the lowest recorded efficiency occurred during a 25% load (5 watts) test in which the unit demonstrated a net efficiency of 6.7% based on the LHV of methanol. Figure 1. SFC Diagram Fuel is supplied by 500ml hot swappable cartridges that screw on to the connection valve and are capable of providing a constant 20 watt power output for 24 hours. Table 1 provides detailed weight measurements of each component. System Dry Weight 1704.90 g Internal Battery 223.74 g Full Fuel Cartridge 472.24 g Empty Fuel Cartridge 89.54 g Total Weight (24hrs) 2.40 kg Total Weight (72hrs) 3.35 kg Table 1. System Weight Breakdown Testing CERDEC Test Plan The CERDEC test plan included a variety of system and environmental evaluations totaling twelve individual tests. When applicable, tests were repeated multiple times to Figure 2. Efficiency Graph Testing Results Fuel Consumption Figure 3 shows fuel consumption ranging from a minimum of 16.3 ml/hour at 5 watts all the way to 24.54 ml/hour during a 20 watt load test. The average fuel consumption between the 5-20 watt load tests was 18.49 ml/hour. It is also significant to note, that neither

orientation nor environmental temperature testing significantly affected fuel consumption rates. Fuel Consumption (ml/hour) 25 20 15 10 5 0 SFC C20MP Gen IV Fuel Consumption Comparisons 5 10 15 20 Load (Watts) Min Voltage Dip @ 25% 11.07 V Table 2. Voltage Characterization Testing Results Lifetime Both units, and 2 were exposed to lifetime testing at the end of the general test cycle. System voltage degradation was first noticed after approximately 50 hours into the lifetime test. At that time, both units had difficulty providing a constant 20 watt power output at which point the load was adjusted to 15 then 10 and finally 5 watts. After approximately 280 hours, both units were not capable of providing a power output. SFC states that system voltage degradation is a result of component breakdown as opposed to actual stack failure. Figure 5 and 6 show the lifetime testing graph of both units. Figure 3. Fuel Consumption Graph Testing Results Voltage Characterization Figure 4 displays a polarization graph of both units. Even with the power output ranging from 25-100% load; the system voltage was stable and remained in the range of 12-12.6 V. 13.5 SFC C20 MP Initial Polarization Test (0-100hours) 20 18 13 16 System Voltage (Volts) 12.5 12 14 12 10 8 System Power (Watts) Figure 5. Lifetime Testing Graph 6 11.5 4 2 11 0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Current (Amps) Voltage Voltage Power Power Poly. ( Power) Poly. ( Power) Poly. ( Voltage) Poly. ( Voltage) Figure 4. Polarization Graph Because the C20-MP units are hybrid fuel cell power sources, it is difficult to perform standard fuel cell voltage characterization testing due to interference from the internal battery. The following limited results were obtained. Min Voltage @ Start up 10.39 V Average Voltage @ Start up 12.63 V Max Voltage Rise @ 100% 18.18 V Max Voltage Rise @ 75% 17.91 V Max Voltage Rise @ 50% 17.28 V Max Voltage Rise @ 25% 16.46 V Min Voltage Dip @ 100% 10.89 V Min Voltage Dip @ 75% 10.93 V Min Voltage Dip @ 50% 10.93 V Figure 6. Lifetime Testing Graph Testing Results Thermal Display Figure 7 and 8 shows the following thermal display observed during a constant 15 watt power output from the rear exhaust panel. No significant thermal reading was noticed at any other side of the C20-MP fuel cell unit.

1 and 300 with, before requiring specialized maintenance upgrade from SFC. Figure 7. 15 watt Infrared Image (Courtesy of Tony DeAnni & Terrill Atwater CERDEC Army Power Division) Figure 8. 10 watt Infrared Image (Courtesy of Tony DeAnni & Terrill Atwater CERDEC Army Power Division) Testing Results Testing Problems Throughout the course of testing, CERDEC test engineers experienced certain technical difficulties when evaluating the C20-MP units. Most of the time, these errors stemmed from secondary components (i.e. fuel and circulator pump) rather than primary component breakdowns. It was noted, that the lithium-ion battery used for peak power and start up had a high self discharge rate. This in part is due to the protection circuitry embedded in the fuel that system that is essential for safe operation. Currently, the discharge rate does offer a significant limiting factor to prolonged operation; however SFC is well aware of the issue and is already making modifications to be incorporated in their next generation units. CERDEC test engineers also experienced moderate errors associated with water management and fuel line air exposure that prevented fuel from reaching the stack. Most of these errors were corrected without significant repair however certain component breakdown required specialized maintenance from SFC. Although SFC specifies that the C20 units are capable of providing 1,000 hour of run time operation, CERDEC has only observed a run time of approximately 1/3 of that, 280 hours with Unit Overall, the C20MP units performed well under limited conditions. Many prior errors stemming from on/off cycle operation as well as stack failure have been eliminated with only minor systematic errors remaining. SFC is currently performing internal lifetime as well component analysis testing that will be used to reduce the number of component failures. SFC demonstrates a clear path to overall system development and is addressing many of the known issues with their next generation of portable power units. Testing Results Military Significance Military significance was also evaluated based on the increased capability that the technology offered to the Warfighter. As mentioned earlier, current Soldier power is supplied via rechargeable or primary batteries. The most widely used military specific battery; the BA-5590 has a weight of 1 kg and provides 180 watt hours of power. The Li-145, a possible alternative to the BA-5590, also weighs 1 kg and provides 145 watt hours of power. As shown in Figure 9, for PEO Soldier s Land Warrior program, seven (7) Li-145 batteries are required for a three day soldier mission totaling in 7 kg of battery weight. Under the same conditions, the SFC C20-MP and associated fuel weighs only 3.5 kg while providing the same power. This demonstrates a 50% weight reduction and offers several logistic advantages such as eliminating the need for battery recharge time. Figure 9. Weight vs. Mission Length (Courtesy of PM SWAR) Conclusion As the traditional battlefield is transformed into a modernized digital arena, power is an increasingly limiting factor in mission capability. The SFC C20-MP has demonstrated good progress towards meeting the growing power demand on the battlefield. CERDEC will continue to play its key role in developing future power sources that will meet the growing power demand and transition technology to the Warfighter quicker.