EFFECTS OF WEATHER-CONTROLLED VARIABLE SPEED LIMITS ON INJURY ACCIDENTS Pirkko Rämä and Anna Schirokoff VTT Building and Transport
Acknowledgements The study was funded by the Finnish National Road Administration, and it has been granted European Community financial aid. 05/12/2005 2
VMS system User acceptance Effects on behaviour Effects on traffic safety - Effect evaluation since 1994? 05/12/2005 3
Aim: To study the effects of variable speed limit systems on injury accidents? Two purposes of the dynamic speed limit systems: 1) to improve traffic safety by decreasing speeds during adverse road conditions 2) to improve fluency by allowing higher speeds under good conditions Before: 80 km/h approx. from November to April After: 100 km/h during good conditions 80 km/h during normal conditions 70/60 km/h during adverse conditions 05/12/2005 4
Background User acceptance well recalled: 88... 90% well accepted: 95% Driver behaviour Reliability mean speed effects: 6... +5 km/h st.dev. of speed: 3 km/h short headways: 10... 25% error-free data collection and control system are required! 05/12/2005 5
15 variable speed limit sections on public roads, in all 350 km 7 weather-controlled systems 4 traffic+weather-controlled systems 1 traffic-controlled system others: 1 section with decreased salting 1 wind warnings on a long bridge Individual speed limits 05/12/2005 6
VMS system on the E18 road 05/12/2005 7
Two types of weather-controlled systems Coastal road E18: fibre optic or LED automatic classification variable warnings use of 100 km/h in winter moderate Roads in Central Finland: electromechanical not automatic classification in all systems no variable warnings 100 km/h over half of the time 05/12/2005 8
Design Six weather controlled speed limit systems on two-lane roads, follow up periods up to 14 years Before-after analysis (AccRisk = AccRiskAfter - AccRiskBefore) Control data from same types of roads with fixed speed limits -> general trend in the injury accident risk (AccRiskCont) Effect : 100 x (AccRiskExp - AccRiskCont) AccRiskExp. 05/12/2005 9
Example from the costal road E18: Pyhtää - Kotka, 8 km 25 20 15 10 5 experiment control -11,2 % -11,5 % Injury accident risk (acc/100 mil vehicle km) 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 90-91 92-93 94-95 96-97 98-99 00-01 02-03 summer winter 05/12/2005 10
Example from Central Finland: Jyväskylä - Äänekoski 29 km 25 20 15 10 5 experiment control +4,1 % +8,6 % Injury accident risk (acc/100 mil vehicle km) 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 90-91 92-93 94-95 96-97 98-99 00-01 02-03 summer winter 05/12/2005 11
Coastal road E18: Results the risk for injury accident decreased approx. 10% the risk for injury accident high before implementation in winter Roads in Central Finland: the risk for injury accident was slightly increased, approx. 2% Results are not statistically significant 05/12/2005 12
Conclusions and discussion The high quality systems with elaborate control system seemed to decrease the injury accident risk, the positive effects base on: efficient recognition of hazardous weather and road conditions use of the variable slippery road signs the moderate use of the highest speed limit (100 km/h) the choice of sign technology The control principles and degree of automation has been developed in systems with negative effects The results highlight the importance of evaluation of impacts Control policy principles and error-free control are important 05/12/2005 13
Conclusion The high quality variable speed limit system seems to be a successful ITS application: Improved safety and mobility! Thank you for the attention! 05/12/2005 14