SPACE PROPULSION SIZING PROGRAM (SPSP)

Similar documents
Mass Estimating Relations

Lunar Surface Access from Earth-Moon L1/L2 A novel lander design and study of alternative solutions

Mass Estimating Relations

Review of iterative design approach Mass Estimating Relationships (MERs) Sample vehicle design analysis

Suitability of reusability for a Lunar re-supply system

Mass Estimating Relations

Ares V: Supporting Space Exploration from LEO to Beyond

ULA Briefing to National Research Council. In-Space Propulsion Roadmap. March 22, Bernard Kutter. Manager Advanced Programs. File no.

Abstract. 1 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Fly Me To The Moon On An SLS Block II

Development of a Low Cost Suborbital Rocket for Small Satellite Testing and In-Space Experiments

Lunar Cargo Capability with VASIMR Propulsion

Upper Stage Evolution

IAC-05-D A Lunar Architecture Design and Decision Environment

OMOTENASHI. (Outstanding MOon exploration TEchnologies demonstrated by NAno Semi-Hard Impactor)

Architecture Options for Propellant Resupply of Lunar Exploration Elements

Analysis of Launch and Earth Departure Architectures for Near-Term Human Mars Missions

A Scalable Orbital Propellant Depot Design

Performance Evaluation of a Side Mounted Shuttle Derived Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle for Lunar Exploration

AN OPTIMIZED PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR Soyuz/ST

Artemis: A Reusable Excursion Vehicle Concept for Lunar Exploration

CONTENTS Duct Jet Propulsion / Rocket Propulsion / Applications of Rocket Propulsion / 15 References / 25

lights on, down 2 ½ 40 feet, down 2 ½ Kickin up some dust 30 feet, 2 ½ down faint shadow

Martin J. L. Turner. Expedition Mars. Published in association with. Chichester, UK

A LEO Propellant Depot System Concept for Outgoing Exploration

The GHOST of a Chance for SmallSat s (GH2 Orbital Space Transfer) Vehicle

Vehicle Reusability. e concept e promise e price When does it make sense? MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Vehicle Reusability

Appenidix E: Freewing MAE UAV analysis

Atlas V Launches the Orbital Test Vehicle-1 Mission Overview. Atlas V 501 Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, FL Space Launch Complex 41

NASA Glenn Research Center Intelligent Power System Control Development for Deep Space Exploration

Multi-Purpose Space Tug Vehicle

Ares I Overview. Phil Sumrall Advanced Planning Manager Ares Projects NASA MSFC. Masters Forum May 14, 2009

VACCO ChEMS Micro Propulsion Systems Advances and Experience in CubeSat Propulsion System Technologies

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Future NASA Power Technologies for Space and Aero Propulsion Applications. Presented to. Workshop on Reforming Electrical Energy Systems Curriculum

THE FALCON I LAUNCH VEHICLE Making Access to Space More Affordable, Reliable and Pleasant

Utilizing Lunar Architecture Transportation Elements for Mars Exploration

Development of Low Cost Propulsion Systems for Launchand In Space Applications

Solar Electric Propulsion Benefits for NASA and On-Orbit Satellite Servicing

NASA s Space Launch System Marks Critical Design Review

Methodology for Distributed Electric Propulsion Aircraft Control Development with Simulation and Flight Demonstration

SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM (SLS)

The 1 N HPGP thruster is designed for attitude and orbit control of small-sized satellites. FLIGHT-PROVEN. High Performance Green Propulsion.

A Model-Based Systems Engineering Approach to the Heavy Lift Launch System Architecture Study

AEROSPACE TEST OPERATIONS

USA FALCON 1. Fax: (310) Telephone: (310) Fax: (310) Telephone: (310) Fax: (310)

Preliminary Cost Analysis MARYLAND

High Power Solar Electric Propulsion for Human Space Exploration Architectures

Design Reliability Comparison for SpaceX Falcon Vehicles

Boeing CST-100. Commercial Crew Transportation System. Keith Reiley, The Boeing Company. February, 2011

Lunette: A Global Network of Small Lunar Landers

Abstract #1754. English. French. Author(s) and Co Author(s) Resources in the cislunar marketplace. To follow. No abstract title in French

IAC-07- A3.I.A.19 A VALUE PROPOSITION FOR LUNAR ARCHITECTURES UTILIZING PROPELLANT RE-SUPPLY CAPABILITIES

Additively Manufactured Propulsion System

How Does a Rocket Engine Work?

CHAPTER 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION TO LM-3C

Cost Estimation and Engineering Economics

Robot Arm with Conveyor Belts

Ares V Overview. presented at. Ares V Astronomy Workshop 26 April 2008

BIMODAL NUCLEAR THERMAL ROCKET (BNTR) PROPULSION FOR FUTURE HUMAN MARS EXPLORATION MISSIONS

BIMODAL NUCLEAR THERMAL ROCKET (BNTR) PROPULSION FOR FUTURE HUMAN MARS EXPLORATION MISSIONS

System Testing by Flight Operators the Rosetta Experience

The 1 N HPGP thruster is designed for attitude and orbit control of small-sized satellites. FLIGHT-PROVEN.

Media Event Media Briefing Arif Karabeyoglu President & CTO SPG, Inc. June 29, 2012

Loads, Structures, and Mechanisms Design Project ENAE 483 Fall 2012

Cassini-Huygens Power Conversion Technology

On Orbit Refueling: Supporting a Robust Cislunar Space Economy

Rocket 101. IPSL Space Policy & Law Course. Andrew Ratcliffe. Head of Launch Systems Chief Engineers Team

Parametric Design MARYLAND

John Klaus Robert Cooper Thilina Fernando Zoe Morozko

Europa Lander Mission Overview and Update

CHANGING ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING PARADIGMS FOR HUMAN MARS LANDER

AMBR* Engine for Science Missions

AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP Weight Management

TOWARDS A HEAVY LAUNCHER - PROPULSION SOLUTIONS - A. Souchier - C. Rothmund Snecma Moteurs, Direction Grosse Propulsion à Liquides

The Magnetic Field in a Coil. Evaluation copy. Figure 1. square or circular frame Vernier computer interface momentary-contact switch

Component and System Level Modeling of a Two-Phase Cryogenic Propulsion System for Aerospace Applications

MISSION OVERVIEW SLC-41

Monopropellant Micro Propulsion system for CubeSats

2019 SpaceX Hyperloop Pod Competition

ReachMars 2024 A Candidate Large-Scale Technology Demonstration Mission as a Precursor to Human Mars Exploration

LUNAR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH BASE. Yuzhnoye SDO proprietary

In-Space Demonstration of HighPerformance Green Propulsion (HPGP) and its Impact on Small Satellites

Launch Vehicle Engine Selection Using Probabilistic Techniques

Human Exploration of the Lunar Surface

HYDROS Development of a CubeSat Water Electrolysis Propulsion System

Modern Approach to Liquid Rocket Engine Development for Microsatellite Launchers

Space Propulsion. An Introduction to.

Realistic Near-Term Propellant Depots: Implementation of a Critical Spacefaring Capability

The Common Spacecraft Bus and Lunar Commercialization

Europa Lander. Mission Concept Update 3/29/2017

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Hypersonic Airplane Space Tether Orbital Launch (HASTOL) System

6. The Launch Vehicle

Electric Flight Potential and Limitations

Prototype Development of a Solid Propellant Rocket Motor and an Electronic Safing and Arming Device for Nanosatellite (NANOSAT) Missions

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) Engine Component Development

Development of a Lunar Architecture Simulation Environment for Evaluation the use of Propellant Re-supply

H-IIA Launch Vehicle Upgrade Development

Success of the H-IIB Launch Vehicle (Test Flight No. 1)

Transcription:

SPACE PROPULSION SIZING PROGRAM (SPSP) Version 9 Let us create vessels and sails adjusted to the heavenly ether, and there will be plenty of people unafraid of the empty wastes. - Johannes Kepler in a letter to Galileo David North, Analytical Mechanics Associates Inc. Michael D. Scher, National Institute of Aerospace Michael Scher, National Institute of Aerospace David North, Analytical Mechanics Associates Inc. Student Session II Paper: GT.SSEC.F.6

SPSP description Overview Mass estimating approach Geometry sizing Spin-off Tools Benchmarking SPSP Demonstration Summary

Space Propulsion Sizing Program (SPSP) Add capability for reliable in-space propulsion system design. Originally designed for high-level sizing and trade studies. Ideal for rapid propulsion trade studies. Evolved into tool for high-level or detailed system design. Combines best mass estimating methods available. Simplified user interface in Microsoft Excel and Visual BASIC. Self-contained help documentation for fast assistance.

SPSP Program Structure V Input Parameters Payload Mass Type Chemical NTR Performance Thrust Propellant Type Number of Engines Structure Tank Configuration Materials Launch Vehicle Payload Envelope Excel Output Parameters Stage Gross Mass Subsystem Dry Masses Engine Tank Propellant Feed Reaction Control Sys Power Structures Avionics Main Propellant Mass RCS Propellant Mass Inert Propellant Masses Residual Propellants Reserve Propellants Pressurization Gas Mass Propellant Boil-Off Mass Burn Duration G-Loading Preliminary Propulsion System Geometry Parameters Geometry Output Ø Lfuel tank L tot L ox tank Leng Øeng Component C.G. s CAD

SPSP Modules and Options System Level Input-Output Module Engine Module Main Tank Module Propellant Feed Module RCS Module Structures Module Avionics Module Power Module Tandem FOT Tandem OOT Storable Cryogenic NTR Storable Cryogenic Storable Cryogenic* Battery Solar Panel Nested NP Nested P NEP/SEP* Solar Sail* Cold Gas Reaction Wheel* Multiple NTR RTG Fuel Cell * Future Development Geometry Generator

SPSP Top-Level Input Page

Help Example: Main Tanks Help Page Describes input requirements and output calculations in detail

Mass Estimating Methods Mass Estimating Methods Method Averaging Mass Est. Relationship Bottom-Up Calculation Regression Database METHOD MODULE Engine X X Main Tanks X X X Propellant Feed X X RCS X X X Power X Structures X Avionics X

Geometry Sizing 2-D cross-section using the Excel lin plot. 3-D CAD software Pro-Engineer imbedded into SPSP with capability to other software 0.00-0.70 0.30 1.30 2.30 3.30 4.30 5.30 6.30 7.30-1.00-2.00-3.00-4.00 17.0 m -5.00-6.00-7.00 Payload Adapter Forward Skirt Aft Compartment Aft Skirt 17.59 m -8.00 Thrust Structure -9.00 Engine Head Engine Nozzle -10.00-11.00 Oxidizer Tank Intertank Fuel Tank -12.00-13.00-14.00-15.00-16.00-17.00

Staging Tool with Optimizers Stacks up to 5 in-space, lander, or launch vehicle stages Each stage is modifiable with separate SPSP files Optimizes the stack to reduce total gross mass or to keep each stage identical Can also be used without optimizer to develop user-driven design

Tanker Sizing Tool Developed for propellant aggregation and propellant transfer trade studies. Identical to main SPSP but has no main engine. Due to similarity, also useful for sizing depots.

Lander Sizing Tool Same as main SPSP with additional structural mass for landing gear Additional structure is 3% of touchdown mass, based on Apollo lander Sizes un-crewed lander due to lack of crew habitat sizing capability

Launch Vehicle Design and Analysis Tool Combines staging tool with a MATLAB program which integrates the equations of motion Assumes simple g-turn trajectory Useful for determining relationship between insertion orbit and payload mass

Other SPSP capabilities Multiple Payload and/or V s Allow up to 5 different payloads and/or 5 different maneuvers Developed to analyze complicated rendezvous sequences Previously SPSP could only size for one payload through one maneuver Boil-off Estimates Added to account for potentially drastic cryogenic propellant losses Based directly on the fundamental physics Used as upper limit for zero boiloff hardware mass to make a positive impact on the propellant storage system

Benchmarking with Known Upper Stages Within an acceptable error Shows conservative estimate on inert masses Primary source of error believed to be avionics estimate Centaur III Delta IV Actual SPSP % error Actual SPSP % error Gross Mass (kg) 18960 19322 1.91% 30710 30564-1.63% Inert Mass (kg) 2180 2193 0.59% 3490 3507 0.49% Prop. Mass (kg) 16780 16972 1.14% 27200 26756-0.48% Mass Fraction 0.885 0.878-0.75% 0.89 0.875-1.67%

The S-IVB at Cutoff 100% Engine and Accessories 13.5% Engine and Accessories 13.9% 90% RCS 3.0% RCS 2.7% 80% Electrical 12.5% Electrical 15.8% 70% Purge and Propellant Feed 11.9% Purge and Propellant Feed 6.0% 60% 50% Tanks and Insulation 31.6% Tanks and Insulation 32.4% 40% 30% 20% Residual LH2 6.5% Residual LOX 1.1% Residual LOX 7.6% Residual LH2 4.6% 10% Structure 15.1% Structure 14.5% 0% Other Residuals 4.8% Other Residuals 2.5% Actual Estimated 12.85 t 12.88 t

Error less than 1% Geometry Comparison Cause of error likely due to shape of bottom tank 12.11 m 12.0 m

SPSP Testing with Known Vehicles Demonstrates inherent relationship between propellant mass fraction and vehicle gross mass. Improved propellant mass fraction estimates. 1 Propulsion System Gross Mass Vs. Propellant Mass Fraction 0.95 Propellant Mass / Propulsion Gross Mass 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 Delta IV 5-Meter Upper Delta IV 5-Meter Upper Stage Stage Gross Mass = 30.84 MT Prop Gross Mass Mass Fract = 30.84 = 0.882 MT Centaur Prop Mass IIIA Fract = 0.882 Centaur IIIA Gross Mass = 18.96 MT Prop Gross Mass Mass Fract = 18.96 = 0.885 MT Prop Mass Fract = 0.885 SPSP SPSP Nested Tanks Pressurized Nested Tanks Pressurized SPSP SPSP Tandem Tanks Fuel on Tandem Tanks Fuel on Top SPSP Top SPSP Nested Tanks Non Nested Tanks Non Pressurized Pressurized Saturn SIV-B Saturn SIV-B Gross Mass = 120 MT Prop Gross Mass Mass Fract = 120 = 0.893 MT Prop Mass Fract = 0.893 0.6 0 50 100 150 200 250 Gross Mass (MT)

SPSP/ProEngineer Demonstration

Summary Simple, robust package of tools Provides reliable estimates for high-level design and rapid trade studies Complete set of tools used to design from launch to in-space maneuvers to landing on a distant planet and returning to earth orbit