U.S. Postal Service Fleet Alternative Fuel Vehicle Program Report for Fiscal Year 2012 February 15, 2013

Similar documents
DEFENSE AGENCIES Fleet Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Report Compliance with EPAct and E.O in Fiscal Year 2008

U.S. Navy Fleet AFV Program Report for Fiscal Year 2009 January 12, 2010

U.S. Navy Fleet AFV Program Report for Fiscal Year 2006 February 12, 2007

U.S. Navy Fleet AFV Program Report for Fiscal Year 2008 May 21, 2009

Department of the Air Force Fleet Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Report Compliance with EPAct 1992/2005 and E.O for Fiscal Year 2007

DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE 8899 East 56 th Street Indianapolis, in Agency Fleet Management Plan for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017

U.S. Department of Energy: Vehicle Technology and Infrastructure Deployment

U S Postal Service Fleet Planning and Management. GovEnergy 2007

Electric Vehicles and EV Infrastructure Municipal Electric Power Association

Green California Summit & Exposition April 7,2008. Green Fleets: Kicking Tires & Crunching Numbers The 1992 Federal Energy Policy Act (EPAct)

Bringing Together State, Alternative Fuel. Fuel Providers to Increase Use of. Fleet Regulatory Requirements. New West Technologies Ryan Daley

The United States Postal Service Ethanol & Bio-Diesel Programs. The Alternative Clean Transportation Conference Long Beach, California May 6, 2014

Federal Fleet Management: Fleet Laws and Regulations

Fleet Sustainability Policy

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS GREEN FLEET POLICY

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

FAST EISA Section 246 Infrastructure Reporting FAQ

Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program. Advisory Committee Meeting

State of New Jersey Alternative Fuel Program

Solano County Transit

California Low Emission Truck Policies and Plans

NAT GAS Acts S 1408 vs. HR 1835 Side by Side

TOWN OF MONTREAT GREEN FLEET POLICY (Adopted April 8, 2010)

Green Fleet Conference Hyatt Regency Chicago October 19-20, 2009

RNG Production for Vehicle Fuel. April 4, 2018

Clean Cities Program Overview

FleetDASH. Fleet Sustainability Dashboard - FleetDASH. Mark Singer National Renewable Energy Laboratory August 17, 2017

Dear New Clean Cities Stakeholder:

MEMORANDUM. Proposed Town of Chapel Hill Green Fleets Policy

Montgomery County Department of General Services DGS Delivering Green Service

CAPITAL PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SECTION VIII FACILITIES OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Refuel: San Diego Regional Alternative Fuel Coordinating Council. Kick-off Meeting October 16, 2014

NYSERDA Alternative Fuel Vehicle Programs. Patrick Bolton and Adam Ruder NYSERDA April 24, 2013

Clean Cities 101. Dallas-Fort Worth Clean Cities Coalition North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department 1

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

RFS2: Where Are We Now And Where Are We Heading? Paul N. Argyropoulos

Caltrans Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Experience. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Equipment (DOE)

PROMOTING THE UPTAKE OF ELECTRIC AND OTHER LOW EMISSION VEHICLES

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA S COMBAT SUPPORT LOGISTICS AGENCY

U.S. Alternative Fuels Policies Lessons Learned and Future Directions

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

California Transportation Electrification and the ZEV Mandate. Analisa Bevan Assistant Division Chief, ECARS November 2016

State of New Jersey Alternative Fuel Program

Minnesota State Light Vehicle Fleet Sustainability Benchmarks FY 2018

USDOT CMAQ Program. Southeast Diesel Collaborative Annual Conference September, 2017

Appendix C SIP Creditable Incentive-Based Emission Reductions Moderate Area Plan for the 2012 PM2.5 Standard

Benefits of greener trucks and buses

Clean Cities 101. Advancing the Choice: Sustainability through Clean Vehicles. Sustainable Communities Training Conference March 10, 2009

Zero Emission Truck Commercialization Summary of the I-710 Project Zero-Emission Truck Commercialization Study Draft Report

PUBLIC Law, Chapter 539 LD 1535, item 1, 124th Maine State Legislature An Act To Create a Smart Grid Policy in the State

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CREDIT FOR EMISSION REDUCTIONS GENERATED THROUGH INCENTIVE PROGRAMS (Adopted June 20, 2013)

Alternative Fuels: Existing Conditions

3.17 Energy Resources

Alternatives to an Open Competitive Commercial Collection Program Presented by Robert Craggs RAM/SWANA Conference

Biofuels Incentives: A Summary of Federal Programs

State Efforts to Promote Alternative Fuels. Kristy Hartman November 13, 2014

Ì229556GÎ CHAMBER ACTION Senate. House...

2018 American Zero Emission Bus Conference INNOVATIVE CLEAN TRANSIT PROPOSED REGULATION

Transportation Electrification: Reducing Emissions, Driving Innovation. July 2017

Household Renewable Energy

CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS

TRANSFORMING TRANSPORTATION

DRAFT April 9, STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CREDIT FOR EMISSION REDUCTIONS GENERATED THROUGH INCENTIVE PROGRAMS (Adopted [adoption date])

Accelerating Domestic Alternative Fuel Capabilities for National Security. Tom Hicks, DASN Energy

Natural Gas in Transportation

The Regional Municipality of York. Purchase of Six Battery Electric Buses

A Guide to the medium General Service. BC Hydro Last Updated: February 24, 2012

State Zero-Emission Vehicle Programs Memorandum of Understanding

FLEET SERVICES OVERVIEW and ACCOMPLISHMENTS Public Works Commission August 10, 2017

May 2, Re: Advanced Technologies Compliance Flexibility Option for Model Year Vehicles Standards Proposal

Vehicle and Equipment Services (4760P)

Purpose of Presentation

Equipment Management Department. Council Budget Presentation

VEHICLE FLEET MANAGEMENT AT THE IDAHO NATIONAL ENGINEERING AND ENVl RONMENTAL LABORATORY

Performance Metrics for the Organizational Fleet Manager. William Gookin & Scott Conlon Mercury Associates

ON-ROAD HEAVY-DUTY TRUCK APPLICATION

Proposed Amendments to the Zero Emission Vehicle Regulation. March 27-28, 2003

Department of Legislative Services

Biofuels Incentives: A Summary of Federal Programs

H.R. Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008

Alternative Fuel Vehicles by Type: Pros, Cons, and Case Studies. Cabell Hodge National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Alternative Fuel Incentive Programs in New York State. Clean Cities Conference May 5, 2004 Patrick Bolton

California Feebate: Revenue Neutral Approach to Support Transition Towards More Energy Efficient Vehicles

OTC/MANE-VU. 19 November 2014

Strategic Plans for Sustainable Ports: The Northwest Ports Clean Air Strategy Experience. Amy Fowler, Puget Sound Clean Air Agency

Agreement with Enbridge for the Installation of Compressed Natural Gas Refuelling Stations at City Facilities

Department of the Environment. Moving Away From Stage II Vapor Recovery

New York State and EVs

Department of Legislative Services

California Energy Commission. December 7, 2015

Internal Audit Report. Fuel Consumption Oversight and Coordination TxDOT Internal Audit Division

THAT the Contracts for the purchase of vehicles BE AWARDED to the following dealerships:

Office of House Republican Whip, Stan Saylor

Unlocking Private Sector Financing for Alternative Fuel Vehicles and Fueling Infrastructure

Economic Development Benefits of Plug-in Electric Vehicles in Massachusetts. Al Morrissey - National Grid REMI Users Conference 2017 October 25, 2017

Alternative Fuel Vehicle Program and Garbage Trucks

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

California Greenhouse Gas Vehicle and Fuel Programs

Natural and Economic Resources Appropriations Subcommittee 20 February W. Steven Burke President and CEO Biofuels Center of North Carolina

Transcription:

U.S. Postal Service Fleet Alternative Fuel Vehicle Program Report for Fiscal Year 2012 February 15, 2013 This report presents data on the number of alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs) acquired by the United States Postal Service (the Postal Service) in fiscal year (FY) 2012, planned acquisitions, projections (FY2013, FY2014, and FY2015), alternative fuel use, and petroleum fuel savings. The report complies with the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005 (P.L. 109-58, 42 U.S.C. 15801) and takes into consideration Executive Order (EO) 13514 -Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance and EO 13423 -Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management. During FY2012, the Postal Service attained an AFV-acquisition percentage of 200% under EPAct. The Postal Service acquired 101 vehicles, 99 light-duty and 2 medium-duty. Of the total light duty vehicles acquired, 2 are EPAct covered. The Postal Service excluded 97 light duty vehicles because they were operated outside a MSA or are law enforcement vehicles. Within the FY 2012 vehicle acquisition, the Postal Service acquired 59 Postal Owned and 3 leased alternative fuel vehicles defined under EPAct or under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2008 definition. The Postal Service earned 3 EPAct credits for alternative fuel vehicles and 1 additional EPAct credit for its biodiesel usage. Energy Legislation and Executive Orders On August 8, 2005, President Bush signed the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005. EPAct requires that in FY1999 and beyond 75% of all covered light-duty vehicles acquired for federal fleets (where fleets have 20 or more vehicles, are capable of being centrally fueled, and are operated in a metropolitan statistical area (MSA) with a population of more than 250,000 based on the 1980 census) be AFVs. Certain types of emergency, law enforcement, and national defense vehicles are exempt from these requirements. EPAct of 2005 Section 701 now requires federal fleets to use alternative fuels in dual-fuel vehicles acquired under the EPAct of 1992 programs unless the Secretary of Energy determines an agency qualifies for a waiver. Criteria for a waiver include: alternative fuel is not reasonably available to the fleet or the cost of alternative fuel is unreasonably more expensive than conventional fuel. In addition, EPAct allows one alternative fuel vehicle acquisition credit for every 450 gallons of neat (pure) biodiesel fuel consumed or 2,250 gallons of B20 (20% biodiesel and 80% regular diesel), as it is normally sold in vehicles over 8,500 pounds gross vehicle weight rating. Biodiesel credits may fulfill up to 50 percent of an agency s EPAct requirements. The head of each Federal agency must also prepare and submit a report to Congress outlining the agency s AFV acquisitions and future plans by February 15th each year. EO 13423 directs Federal agencies operating a fleet of 20 or more vehicles within the United States, (i) to reduce their annual petroleum consumption in non-exempt vehicles by 2% annually through the end of fiscal year 2015 relative to agency baseline for fiscal year 2005, (ii) increase the total fuel consumption that is non-petroleum based by 10 percent annually, and (iii) use plug-in hybrid (PIH) vehicles when PIH vehicles are commercially available at a cost reasonably comparable, on the basis of life-cycle costs to non-pih vehicles. This EO does not apply to the Postal Service; however, to achieve compliance with the legislative mandates of EPAct, we will take into consideration EO 13423 when developing the Postal Service s compliance strategy. In January 2008, the National Defense Authorization Act was signed into public law (110-181) by President Bush. The Act amends the 2005 Energy Policy Act allowing Federal Agencies to acquire a broader array of alternative fuel vehicles (AFV), which includes hybrid and very fuel efficient motor vehicles. In October of 2009, President Obama signed Executive Order (EO) 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance. This EO expanded upon EO 13423. A portion of 1

the new order requires Federal executive agencies to increase their energy efficiency, reduce fleet petroleum consumption, conserve water, reduce waste, support sustainable communities, and leverage their Federal purchasing power to promote environmentally responsible products and technologies. Executive Order 13514 expands upon EO 13423. Language in EO 13514 asks Federal executive agencies to consider reducing use of fossil fuels by using low greenhouse gas emitting vehicles; optimizing the number of vehicles in the agency fleet; and reducing petroleum consumption by 2 percent annually through FY2020 with a 2005 baseline. It also requires Federal executive agencies to set GHG emission reduction targets; establish GHG emission inventories; and develop Strategic Sustainability Performance Plans. The EO does not apply to the Postal service but we have adopted many of the policies and programs under postal authority. In May of 2011, President Obama issued a Presidential Memorandum that required all federal fleets to acquire only alternative fuel vehicles by the end of 2015. The memo included issues such as vehicle size, engine size, optional equipment, and optimum fleet size as well as leveraging purchasing dollars to build manufacturing capacity for more alternative fueled vehicles. It also requires the disclosure by the Agency on the Agency website of executive fleet vehicles that are larger than a midsize sedan or do not comply with alternative fueled vehicle requirements. The memo's requirements do not apply to the Postal Service, but it contains language asking the Department of Energy to continue to work with the Postal Service to test alternative fuel vehicles. U.S. Postal Service Approach to EPAct Compliance, also taking into consideration Executive Order 13514 and 13423 To achieve compliance with the legislative mandates of EPAct, EISA and take into consideration EO 13514 and 13423, the Postal Service s strategy for vehicle acquisitions is as follows: Among Federal entities, the Postal Service has a unique mission and does not receive appropriations for its operating expenses. The Postal Service takes into consideration Executive Order 13514 and 13423 when developing strategies to reduce fuel consumption and increase fleet operational efficiency. This is discussed in further detail under the Petroleum Savings section of this report. The Postal Service also seeks out AFVs that will comply with operational requirements for non-mailhauling purchases. Delivery (mail hauling) vehicle purchases will be AFVs, provided that mission-appropriate and cost effective vehicles are made available by manufacturers. The Postal Service Headquarters will continue to centrally purchase all delivery vehicles. The Postal Service will continue to use biodiesel in its diesel vehicles when it is cost comparable. In FY2012, 334,190 gasoline gallons equivalent (GGE) of neat biodiesel were used, earning the Postal Service 743 EPAct credits. The uneven stream of delivery vehicle purchases can cause large fluctuations in the absolute numbers of acquisitions that form the basis for EPAct percentage calculation. The Postal Service does not purchase delivery vehicles on a regular schedule. Since the majority of delivery vehicles are custom-designed, right-hand-drive vehicles, the Postal Service purchases vehicles in large quantities to attain a favorable unit price, as shown in Table 1. 2

Year Table 1. U.S. Postal Service s Vehicle Acquisition Summary Vehicle Total 2005 3,044 2006 5,168 2007 5,913 2008 2,126 2009 3,226 *Vehicle Type Fuel Type Other E85 CNG Electric Hybrid LPG LD 1,483 1,387 MD 103 HD 71 LD 608 2,688 MD 168 HD 1,704 LD 483 5,242 6 MD 72 HD 110 LD 249 1,825 MD 26 HD 26 LD 1,979 505 731 MD 10 HD 1 2010 3,308 LD 2,620 521 167 2011 120 2012 101 *LD Light Duty MD Medium Duty HD Heavy Duty LD 37 68 2 MD 13 LD 37 62 MD 1 1 FY2012 U.S. Postal Service Fleet Compliance The Postal Service leases and purchases both covered and non-covered LDVs. In FY2012 a total of 99 LDVs were acquired; 97 vehicles were exempted because they are operated primarily outside of a covered MSA or are law enforcement vehicles. 100% of the remaining 2 vehicles were AFVs under EPAct or the NDAA. The Postal Service also gained 1 credit for biodiesel fuel use and credit for 1 medium-duty AFV. The combination of AFV acquisitions and biodiesel use earned the Postal Service a grand total of 4 AFV credits in FY2012. As a result, the Postal Service once again exceeded the mandatory 75% EPAct requirement with a total EPAct percentage of 200%, as shown in Table 2. 3

Table 2. U.S. Postal Service s Acquisition of AFVs in FY2012 EPAct- Covered AFV Acquisition Requirement for FY2012 Total AFV (including credits) EPAct Percentage 2 2 4 200% This is the fifteenth consecutive year that the Postal Service has met or exceeded the minimum EPAct AFV acquisition requirement FY2012 U.S. Postal Service Fleet Fuel Use Table 3 presents FY2012 fuel consumption data by fuel type for the Postal Service s vehicle fleet. It includes fuel consumption for the 210,331 Postal Service vehicles. Table 3. U.S. Postal Service Fuel Use in FY2012 Postal Service Fleet Fuel Use In GGE From Biodiesel (B100) 334,190 From CNG 34,953 From E-85 548,510 From Electric 2,973 From Propane 3,348 Total Alternative Fuel Use 923,974 From Gasoline 120,701,590 From Diesel 29,480,562 Total Non-Alternative Fuel Use 150,182,152 Total Vehicle Energy Use 151,106,126 Petroleum Savings Among Federal agencies covered by EPAct, the Postal Service is unique. The mandate for providing universal delivery service requires that its mail distribution and delivery network must constantly adapt to meet the needs of millions of new households and businesses across the country. As a business entity that operates within a highly competitive environment, the Postal Service must also remain acutely sensitive to its customers' needs for affordable service. The Postal Service's mandate to serve the daily mail delivery needs of growing communities across the country is met largely through its delivery vehicle fleet. While this vehicle-based service mandate is in fundamental conflict with Federal goals to reduce agency motor vehicle fuel consumption, by improving 4

the efficiency of its operations the Postal Service has minimized its fuel requirements. The vast majority of fuel used for daily mail delivery is purchased from local merchants using the Voyager Fleet Credit Card. Letter carriers refuel their vehicles at locations along their routes when possible, thus avoiding the higher costs (in terms of work hours and added fuel consumption) associated with traveling to more distant or specialized fueling points. In addition, mail automation and management initiatives have reduced the absolute number of delivery routes, avoided the creation of routes to support new delivery growth, and increased the average number of deliveries served by individual carriers. The Postal Service continues to increase the efficiency of the delivery network by regularly reviewing transportation networks and consolidating or eliminating trips where appropriate. These transportation efficiency actions reduce fuel consumption, consistent with Federal goals. Another factor that influences Postal Service fuel statistics is the agency's decision to provide additional right-hand drive postal vehicles to selected rural delivery routes. The fuel used by these postal vehicles appears as increased consumption for FAST reporting purposes, but in reality it offsets fuel that was formerly used in the rural carriers' privately owned vehicles. The nature of postal operations, including the unavoidable stop-and-go duty cycle of the routes, makes it difficult to obtain significant fuel savings with conventional vehicles. However new technologies such as hybrid electric and dedicated electric vehicles have emerged which likely would give much better gas mileage, especially in stop-and-go situations, and vehicle manufacturers are rapidly bringing this technology to market. Alternative Fuel Use The consumption of 548,510 GGE of E85 led alternative fuel usage in FY2012. The fleet also consumed: 334,190 GGE Neat biodiesel 34,953 GGE CNG 3,348 GGE LPG 2,973 GGE Electricity In FY2012, the fleet consumed 923,974 GGEs of alternative fuel. The Postal Service has made a concerted effort to increase alternative fuel use by issuing memoranda to field operations to utilize alternative fuels without compromising our mission. Unfortunately, the cost of alternative fuels, in some cases, is higher than the petroleum fuel; this further exacerbates the Postal Service s strained financial position. To help achieve the goals of reducing petroleum use by 20% and increasing alternative fuel usage by 10%, the Postal Service has added an Energy Reduction Indicator to the National Performance Assessment, a Postal Service system that collects information to monitor performance across the nation. This information is used during annual employee reviews. The potential to utilize E-85 and other alternative fuels is limited by their commercial availability. Like the general public, the Postal Service relies on local commercial infrastructure to supply convenient and competitively-priced fuel for its delivery fleet. If alternative fuel locations are not conveniently located and competitively priced, the Postal Service cannot access and utilize them in its delivery fleet. While the Postal Service provides information on AFV deployment to interested suppliers and industry advocates to assist in development of fuel infrastructure, postal fleet fuel demand alone may be insufficient to make new installations cost-effective for commercial fuel providers. Postal Service managers have learned that commercial transactions using fleet purchase cards often do not accurately report types of alternative fuels used in Postal vehicles. The necessity to report compliance with EPAct and Executive Order requirements brought the inaccuracies of alternative fuel use reporting through public fueling centers and commercial fleet card systems into focus. Legislation to date has failed to recognize the difficulty for federal fleets to demonstrate compliance with the requirements to use alternative fuels. The Postal Service fleet depends on public alternative fuel infrastructure to purchase 5

alternative fuels using fleet cards. These card systems are excellent at recording the financial aspects of the fuel transactions but fall short of accurately recording the quantity and type of fuel purchased. This impacts the Postal Service's ability to report all alternative fuel usage accurately. Unlike other agencies the Postal Service does not receive Congressional appropriations for its fuel costs. Instead, our fuel costs are funded by sales of postage and services, and we rely on local commercial infrastructure to supply convenient and competitively-priced fuel. As a self-funded entity operating within a highly competitive business environment, the price of alternative fuel on a GGE basis is particularly significant to the Postal Service. Controlled testing of our flexible fuel delivery vehicles has documented a 27% reduction in fuel efficiency when operated on E-85 fuel due to its reduced energy content relative to gasoline. From the standpoint of our business and ratepayer concerns, alternative fuel must be both very conveniently located in order to avoid undue carrier work-hour expense associated with refueling, and competitively priced on a GGE basis. Alternative Fuel Vehicle Activities Below is a summary of some of the current and future activities relating to Postal Service Alternative Fuel Vehicles: In December 2009, five companies were awarded contracts to convert a LLV to an ellv (battery electric vehicle). We will continue testing ellvs within our network in the DC metropolitan area. In December 2011, the Postal Service began testing 10 Navistar estar 2-ton electric step vans. The program is part of the America Recovery and Reinvestment Act funded through the Department of Energy. The vehicles are being tested in 3 locations, Los Angeles, CA (5 vehicles), Manhattan, NY (3 vehicles), and Fairfax, VA (2 vehicles). The vehicles are being tested for a period of 2 years. Fuel efficiency, energy usage, maintenance, and vehicle utilization data will be collected during this test. Contracts were awarded to convert one Grumman light duty delivery vehicle to a clean diesel drive train and one Grumman light duty delivery vehicle to a fuel efficient gasoline drive train. The Postal Service took delivery of the re-powered gasoline vehicle prototype March 2012 and the re-powered diesel vehicle prototype by the end of September 2012. The vehicles have been deployed to delivery units in the Washington, DC area for a one year field evaluation. The vehicles are to be placed on curbside routes and will be monitored for fuel efficiency and performance. The Postal Service is partnering with New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) and New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) to purchase alternative powered vehicles to be utilized in the State of New York or New York City area. Currently the Postal Service, NYSDOT, and NYSERDA are reviewing the specifications and draft solicitation. The Postal Service received a Chevrolet Equinox hydrogen fuel cell vehicle and it began testing in Hawaii in late spring 2012. The vehicle will be used for 1 year and it will be rotated on different routes to collect operational data on different route types. The Postal Service completed a one year evaluation of the neighborhood electric vehicle (NEV) from E-Ride at Alexandria, VA post office in 2012. Mileage, electric consumption, maintenance and carrier s comments were collected. A report was issued and E-Ride will be working on the next generation of neighborhood electric vehicle. Summary As detailed in this report, the Postal Service once again exceeded minimum EPAct AFV acquisition requirements in FY2012, thereby meeting or exceeding the requirements for the fifteenth consecutive year. Further, we would like to note that USPS is a self-supporting agency that funds its operations from the revenue generated by the sales of products and services not taxpayer subsidies received through the Congressional appropriations process. Currently, the USPS financial condition poses a significant barrier to fund a major acquisition, and for that reason and also to gain financial stability, USPS is taking aggressive steps to increase efficiencies in our network. 6

Appendix A 2012 AFV Report: Actual Data (FY2012) 1. Actual Light-Duty Vehicle and Exemptions Lease Purchased Total Total Light-Duty Vehicle 5 94 99 Fleet Exemptions: Fleet Size 0 0 0 Fleet Exemptions: Foreign 0 0 0 Fleet Exemptions: Geographic 0 0 0 Fleet Exemptions: Non-MSA Operation 0 0 0 Vehicle Exemptions: LE Vehicle 0 94 94 Vehicle Exemptions: Non-covered Vehicle 0 0 0 Vehicle Exemptions: Non-MSA Operation 3 0 3 Total EPAct-Covered Vehicles 2 0 2 2. Actual Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Detail Vehicle Type Fuel LE Lease Purchase Total Light Duty Vehicles Sedan/St Wgn Midsize E85 FF Yes 0 12 12 0 Sedan/St Wgn Subcompact E85 FF No 1 0 1 1 LD Minivan 4x2 (Passenger) E85 FF No 1 0 1 1 LD SUV 4x2 E85 FF Yes 0 6 6 0 LD Van 4x4 (Cargo) E85 FF Yes 0 40 40 0 Medium Duty Vehicles MD SUV E85 FF Yes 0 1 1 0 MD Van (Cargo) E85 FF No 1 0 1 1 Totals: 3 59 62 3 EPAct Credits 3. Actual EPAct Acquisition Credits Summary Base AFV Acquisition Credits: 3 Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Credits: 0 Dedicated Light Duty AFV Credits: 0 Dedicated Medium Duty AFV Credits: 0 Dedicated Heavy Duty AFV Credits: 0 Biodiesel Fuel Usage Credits: 3 1 Total EPAct Credits: 4 Overall EPAct Compliance Percentage: 200 % 7

2012 AFV Report: Planned Data (FY2013) 1. Planned Light-Duty Vehicle and Exemptions Lease Purchased Total Total Light-Duty Vehicle 79 190 269 Fleet Exemptions: Fleet Size 0 0 0 Fleet Exemptions: Foreign 2 7 9 Fleet Exemptions: Geographic 0 0 0 Fleet Exemptions: Non-MSA Operation 0 0 0 Vehicle Exemptions: LE Vehicle 0 183 183 Vehicle Exemptions: Non-covered Vehicle 0 0 0 Vehicle Exemptions: Non-MSA Operation 68 0 68 Total EPAct-Covered Vehicles 9 0 9 2. Planned Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Detail Vehicle Type Fuel LE Light Duty Vehicles Lease Purchase Total Sedan/St Wgn Compact E85 FF No 2 0 2 2 Sedan/St Wgn Midsize E85 FF No 17 0 17 17 LD Minivan 4x2 (Cargo) E85 FF No 1 0 1 1 LD Minivan 4x2 (Passenger) E85 FF No 14 0 14 14 LD Pickup 4x2 E85 FF No 3 0 3 3 LD SUV 4x2 E85 FF Yes 0 183 183 0 LD Pickup 4x4 E85 FF No 1 0 1 1 Medium Duty Vehicles MD Van (Cargo) E85 FF No 1 0 1 1 Totals: 39 183 222 39 3. Planned EPAct Acquisition Credits Summary Base AFV Acquisition Credits: 39 Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Credits: 0 Dedicated Light Duty AFV Credits: 0 Dedicated Medium Duty AFV Credits: 0 Dedicated Heavy Duty AFV Credits: 0 Biodiesel Fuel Usage Credits: 3 3 Total EPAct Credits: 42 Overall EPAct Compliance Percentage: 467 % EPAct Credits 8

2012 AFV Report: Projected Data (FY2014) 1. Projected Light-Duty Vehicle and Exemptions Lease Purchased Total Total Light-Duty Vehicle 62 5,190 5,252 Fleet Exemptions: Fleet Size 0 0 0 Fleet Exemptions: Foreign 1 0 1 Fleet Exemptions: Geographic 0 0 0 Fleet Exemptions: Non-MSA Operation 0 0 0 Vehicle Exemptions: LE Vehicle 0 190 190 Vehicle Exemptions: Non-covered Vehicle 0 0 0 Vehicle Exemptions: Non-MSA Operation 46 0 46 Total EPAct-Covered Vehicles 15 5,000 5,015 2. Projected Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Detail Vehicle Type Fuel LE Lease Purchase Total Light Duty Vehicles Sedan/St Wgn Midsize E85 FF No 1 0 1 1 LD Minivan 4x2 (Cargo) E85 FF No 2 5,000 5,002 5,002 LD Minivan 4x2 (Passenger) E85 FF No 19 0 19 19 LD SUV 4x2 E85 FF Yes 0 190 190 0 LD Pickup 4x4 E85 FF No 1 0 1 1 Medium Duty Vehicles MD Other E85 FF No 4 0 4 4 MD Van (Cargo) E85 FF No 2 0 2 2 Totals: 29 5,190 5,219 5,029 EPAct Credits 3. Projected EPAct Acquisition Credits Summary Base AFV Acquisition Credits: 5,029 Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Credits: 0 Dedicated Light Duty AFV Credits: 0 Dedicated Medium Duty AFV Credits: 0 Biodiesel Fuel Usage Credits: 3 866 Total EPAct Credits: 5,895 Overall EPAct Compliance Percentage: 118 % 9

2012 AFV Report: Forecast Data (FY2015) 1. Forecast Light-Duty Vehicle and Exemptions Lease Purchased Total Total Light-Duty Vehicle 65 2,690 2,755 Fleet Exemptions: Fleet Size 0 0 0 Fleet Exemptions: Foreign 7 0 7 Fleet Exemptions: Geographic 0 0 0 Fleet Exemptions: Non-MSA Operation 0 0 0 Vehicle Exemptions: LE Vehicle 0 190 190 Vehicle Exemptions: Non-covered Vehicle 0 0 0 Vehicle Exemptions: Non-MSA Operation 41 0 41 Total EPAct-Covered Vehicles 17 2,500 2,517 2. Forecast Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Detail Vehicle Type Fuel LE Lease Purchase Total Light Duty Vehicles LD Minivan 4x2 (Cargo) E85 FF No 2 2,500 2,502 2,502 LD Minivan 4x2 (Passenger) E85 FF No 14 0 14 14 LD SUV 4x2 E85 FF Yes 0 190 190 0 LD Van 4x2 (Passenger) E85 FF No 1 0 1 1 LD Pickup 4x4 E85 FF No 1 0 1 1 LD SUV 4x4 E85 FF No 3 0 3 3 Medium Duty Vehicles MD Other E85 FF No 3 0 3 3 MD Van (Cargo) E85 FF No 1 0 1 1 Totals: 25 2,690 2,715 2,525 EPAct Credits 3. Forecast EPAct Acquisition Credits Summary Base AFV Acquisition Credits: 2,525 Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Credits: 0 Dedicated Light Duty AFV Credits: 0 Dedicated Medium Duty AFV Credits: 0 Dedicated Heavy Duty AFV Credits: 0 Biodiesel Fuel Usage Credits: 3 935 Total EPAct Credits: 3,460 Overall EPAct Compliance Percentage: 137 % Notes: 10

1. For data presented above representing years prior to 2010, hypothetical compliance figures are shown that exclude any LE and/or E/ER acquisition credits to help FAST users quantify the extent to which those credits factor into the organization's compliance percentage. 2. For years prior to 2009, EPAct acquisition credits were not granted for acquisition of vehicles with hybrid fuel configurations (e.g., gas-electric hybrid configurations). Beginning with 2009 and continuing forward for all subsequent years, vehicles with these fuel configurations are considered alternative fueled vehicles and corresponding credits are granted and shown, if appropriate, in the above tables. 3. EPAct allows credits toward compliance to be granted for consumption of biodiesel fuel; one (1) credit toward compliance is granted for each 450 gallons of biodiesel consumed, with a maximum of 50% of an organization's credits toward compliance coming from biodiesel consumption. 11