STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Similar documents
Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

STAFF REPORT INFORMATION ONLY

PROJECT BACKGROUND 3

Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Scarborough Transit Planning

Mr. Vince Mauceri General Manager Transportation Operations and Technology

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Developing Toronto s Transit Network Plan to Public Information Meeting June 21, 2016

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Developing Toronto s Transit Network Plan to 2031

Issues Facing the Panel

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

APPENDIX 6: Transportation Modelling Considerations City of Toronto, February 2014

Yonge Relief Network Study (YRNS)

Public Information Session June 2, Transportation Planning Section City Planning Division Toronto Transit Commission

CONNECTING THE REGION

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Richmond Hill Centre. Langstaff. Centre. Steeles. Drewry. Finchurst. North York Centre. Yonge. Wilson York Mills. York Mills. Lawrence.

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Yonge-Eglinton. Mobility Hub Profile. September 19, 2012 YONGE- EGLINTON

Making Tracks to Torontonians 2012

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

WELCOME TO OUR PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit (LRT)

Recommended Vision for the Downtown Rapid Transit Network

Welcome to Open House #5 Scarborough Rapid Transit

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

RELIEF LINE PRELIMINARY BENEFITS CASE ANALYSIS. November 2012

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) PLEASE SIGN IN

Branch Edmonton Transit

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

The Bloor-Danforth Subway 40 Years After Opening Why Was It So Successful? By Steve Munro March 14, Background

Mississauga Transit 2009 Budget

Pembina Institute REPORT. Mayor Ford s. New Transit Proposal. Analysis and recommendations. by Cherise Burda and Graham Haines

CITY of GUELPH Transit Growth Strategy and Plan, Mobility Services Review. ECO Committee

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Opportunities for Improved Bus Service on Finch Avenue 27 April 2011

Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

2011 Saskatoon Transit Services Annual Report

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 2017

Needs and Community Characteristics

Accessible Transit Services Plan

EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

3. SIGNALLING 3.1 INTRODUCTION. Present Operation - Facts and Figures

CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN. Making Headway. Capital Investments to Keep Transit Moving

6 Mobility Plus Annual Service Plan

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

Regional Express Rail: Kipling Station Project Update. Ryah Kazman, Community Relations Specialist Metrolinx

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

CONNECTING THE REGION

Spadina Subway Extension Downsview Station to Steeles Avenue Environmental Assessment

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

YRRTC Business Plan

5 RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK PLAN PRINCIPLES, METROLINX BUSINESS CASE, AND ALTERNATIVE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ANALYSIS UPDATE

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

History of Subway in Kyoto

Public Transit Planning and. Advocacy

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

OPTIMAL POLICIES FOR TRANSIT INFRASTRUCTURE

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. p:/2015/clusterb/tra/northyork/pw15086

Metrolinx: Transforming the Way We Move - A Network Wide Approach. Greg Percy, Chief Operating Officer November 1, 2016

Attachment 5 Eglinton West LRT Planning and Technical Update

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Vanpooling and Transit Agencies. Module 3: Benefits to Incorporating Vanpools. into a Transit Agency s Services

Rate Review 2017 Off-Street Municipal Parking Facilities

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Benchmarking, Planning, and Promoting Transit- Oriented Intensification in Rapid Transit Station Areas: Project Key Indicators March 2016

City Transfer Stations: Loading Services and Fees

New McNicoll Bus Garage Public Open House

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Appendix G: Rapid Transit Technology Backgrounder July 2017

Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

METRO TRANSIT a n n ua l re p o r t. madison, wisconsin // mymetrobus.com

LRT vs. Subway. Scarborough RT and Sheppard

Level of Service Analysis for Urban Public Transportation of Dumlupinar University Evliya Celebi Campus in Kutahya, Turkey

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Transcription:

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 2016 Operating Budget: Service Standards, Profile, and Initiatives Date: June 17, 2015 To: From: TTC Budget Subcommittee Chief Executive Officer Summary The attached presentation explains the standards which govern the design of TTC services and the allocation of service resources, such as the service-improvement initiatives which the TTC started this year as a result of Council s $95 million investment in service. Recommendations It is recommended that the Budget Sub-committee receive the attached presentation. Financial Impact The adoption of this report would have no effect on the TTC s operating or capital budgets. The Chief Financial & Administration Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information. Decision History At its August 19, 2014 meeting, the TTC Board adopted the report, Opportunities to Improve Transit Service in Toronto. http://www.ttc.ca/about_the_ttc/commission_reports_and_information/commission_me etings/2014/august_19/supplementary_reports/opportunities_to_improve_transit_servic e_in_toronto.pdf On March 11, 2015, Toronto City Council passed the 2015 City Budget, which confirmed funding for the Opportunities initiative. https://www.ttc.ca/about_the_ttc/commission_reports_and_information/commission_m eetings/2015/february_2/reports/2015_ttc_and_wheel_trans_operating_bu DGETS.pdf

The attached presentation provides more details on the rationale for improving transit in Toronto. Issue Background Toronto s citizens want, need, and respond very favourably to perceptible basic improvements to existing bus, streetcar, and subway services. Today, there is widespread support for more and better-quality transit service in Toronto ones which are simple, cheap, and fast to implement. The attached presentation recaps the low-cost service improvement initiatives which have advanced the TTC s mission to provide a reliable, efficient and integrated bus, streetcar and subway network. Conclusion Service-improvement initiatives achieve significant improvements to the TTC network in the form of more-convenient bus and streetcar service, better service reliability, and reduced travel times. They increase the attractiveness and competitiveness of TTC services and, ultimately, attract more people to transit. Contact Mitch Stambler Head of Strategy and Service Planning 416-393-4460 mitch.stambler@ttc.ca

2016 Operating Budget Service Standards, Profile, and Initiatives 6/17/2015 1

Transit Service right. service amount time place maximize mobility maximize quality service affordable: users taxpayers 2

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Decision rules, standards for service resources: objective, data-, fact-based: ridership origin-destination data travel behaviour research grounded in business logic, principles transparent, quantifiable, reproducible applied consistently, fairly, equitably 6/17/2015 3

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes System structure and design: grid network: exploit Toronto s road-system grid maximize travel choices, combinations subway-oriented: fastest service for longer trips most cost-effective mode for high-volume demand network connectivity: fullest coverage, access throughout city maximize travel choices, combinations 6/17/2015 4

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes System structure and design: most-direct route possible no off-route diversions fastest, minimum travel time no duplication: best use of available resources minimize transfers: consistent, with travellers behaviour, preferences 5

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Coverage, access: design: 10-minute walk to transit 5-minute not eligible for additional service overnight: 15-minute walk to transit conditional on density, land use to support viable operation exceptions: physical, geographical barriers 6

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Accessibility: all vehicles, facilities accessible to everybody: accommodate mobility devices barrier-free paths, movement accommodate visually-impaired accessible communications specialized service (Wheel-Trans) for more-severe disabilities 7

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Minimum ROI on new service expenditures: determine required resources gross operating costs project new ridership, revenues (new to system) calculate net operating costs determine new riders gained / net dollar operating cost minimum ROI threshold = 0.23 new riders / net dollar cost: eligible for trial implementation subject to budget availability 8

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Productivity standard: boardings per service hour minimum productivity threshold = 15 boardings / hour productivity of 10-15 allowed if no alternative service within 600 metres (8-minute walk) exceptions allowed in accordance with policy objective, budget availability: eg all-day, every-day: 9 boardings / hour 9

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Changes, expansion to routes: decision rule overall / net improvement for customers effects on customers: measured wrt effects on travel time: walk access wait time in-vehicle travel time transfer implications weighted by number of customers affected weighted by customers perception of effects: derived from travel behaviour research assessment must show net positive results for customers 10

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Travel Behaviour Research Customer Perceptions Travel time: 1 minute in-vehicle 1 minute waiting 1 minute walking 1 transfer = 1 minute = 1.5 minutes = 2.5 minutes = 10 minutes 11

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Express service: existing corridor characteristics: ridership levels high proportion of long-distance trips concentration of ons / offs at major stops major generators at route ends (subway, college, shopping centre) assess for net benefits / disbenefits to customers (customer-minutes) net effect must be positive 12

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Additional period of service -- existing route: projected ridership: current ridership on route, other nearby routes determine cost service hours, dollars assessment based on productivity (boardings / hour) threshold 10 subject to budget availability 13

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Earlier start / later finish to service: project ridership: current ridership at beginning / end of service related to timing relative to subway start / finish determine cost: service hours, dollars assessment based on productivity (boardings / hour) threshold 10 subject to budget availability 14

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes Maximum waiting times / minimum level of service: bus, streetcar routes = 30 minutes subway = 5 minutes customers won t wait longer than scheduled 30 minutes minimum required to keep service competitive rapid transit must be rapid 15

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes On-board crowding standards used to: identify overcrowding on routes: increase service identify surplus capacity on routes: service reduction when required 16

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes On-board crowding standards: tolerable crowding / comfort move to, from doors accommodate surge loading Vehicle Peak bus 50 to 53 articulated bus 77 streetcar articulated streetcar 108 Crowding Standard 74 low-floor streetcar 130 17

m > 0 Regular 12 metre Bus [a] [OJ [OJ [OJ 9i!... Typical Crowding During Peak Periods 51 People.. 1Z 0 a: LL m > 0 Articulated 18 metre Bus Typical Crowding During Peak Periods 77 People.. z 0 a: LL

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes prevent overcrowding prevent customer discomfort, dissatisfaction 19

Service: Standards, Decision Rules, Processes University of Melbourne, Australia:...TTC practices are exceptional internationally resulting in high occupancy rates by international standards, and efficient use of staff and vehicles. 20

TTC Service Profile 6/17/2015 21

22

~ h " ~ ffuj;f ~~ / Ar- ~ 4..i.'Ulr TOAONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION :::i:: Rapid Transit with Station Streetcar ~ nc SP» 11.20Q.I DAG. No. 11 m 23

\- ~ z 0 g ~ ~ g i I i ll.t:., 0 8,.& * ii -g ~ 1 i *i J..... ~! 0 (/)... z 0 0... ~Ill ~ t 24 -- ' '

~ ~v1- TORONTO TRAH$1T COMMIHIOH :::::: Rapid Transit with Stallon Streelcar and Bos ---Crossbouncla,y Bus ---OthM Bus ---GO Bus..., ----"-" GO Rall wllh Station TIC SP)l).1 t~oag. No.11781 25

1,508 buses in peak service

-l \ 202 streetcars in peak service

105 rapid transit trains in peak service

~ ro $ QJ -1-,J :::::, c ~ L.f') c..c -1-,J $ c 0-1-,J ~ nj -.-I * 0) 0 0 0 0 \.D 0 N ' LI) ' I".-I Vl ("() \.D ::, Vl N ' N ' c: Cl)...:.::: 0 u +-'.-t cu c.-t "'C 3: 0 0 i... N 0... c 0 OJ ~ +-' ::::, '+ a, E > +-' CL LI) i.j

Current Off-Peak Coverage

2011 Census 15-minute-or-better service

2011 Census 15-minute-or-better service

5 minute walk: 2,240,400 (86%) City of Toronto 2,615,000 2011 Census 15-minute-or-better service

Population Within 15 Minute Walk Overnight Bus Network I'< 1?.'356 Q'?'-0. ~o'"' '.fr <:-c,cj 15 minute walk: 2,446,500 (94%) City of Toronto 2,615,000 2011 Census

On-Board Crowding Peak Bus Service existing crowding standard (50 to 53 avg. per bus): 5% of peak bus service is overcrowded; 14 routes: 15 periods of operation approved crowding standard (47 to 50 avg. per bus): 15% of peak bus service is overcrowded; 34 routes: 40 periods of operation 35

Maximum Wait-Time Standards Status peak-period service: 100% within standard (338 of 339 periods of operation) off-peak service: 99% within standard (1,544 of 1,565 periods of operation) 36

Transfers Required in TTC Trips 6/17/2015 37

Accessibility Status all buses accessible; over 90% low-floor 38

Accessible TTC s New Low-Floor 100% Low-Floor Streetcar Streetcars 6/17/2015 40

Accessibility Status Accessible streetcars: accessible low-floor streetcars on 510 Spadina 2015: 509 Harbourfront, 511 Bathurst, 505 Dundas all streetcar routes accessible by 2019 42

Accessibility Status all subway trains accessible 43

Accessible Fare Gates

-

Accessible Subway Stations Pape Station 47

Accessibility Subway Stations Pape Station 48

Accessible Subway Stations Dufferin, Lawrence West just completed currently: 34 stations accessible 49

\ su z I Accessible Subway Map 1 (!ID Downsview,~ [fill Wilson O O Yorkdale Lawrence West ~ O Glencairn Eglinton West 0 1 ~ Finch [fill North York Centre! Bayview O Sheppard-Yonget~ ~ Leslie [fill -= Bessarion [fill 0 York Mills Lawrence O 0 Eglinton lfill Davisville 0 Don Mills O St Clair West O 0 St Clair Summerhill O Dupont O St George...,Ii.~ O Rosedale ~ ~... 'l>~,e~,~ o-. 0 Spadina~(l e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ) (/,.. "" "'- e,<:- o<:- ~ "'- - Bloor-'~ q <:P r3- <..c,; Kipling "" ~ o 0,._e, & ~? 0 e:; ~<:-.._ <.. 0 ~ i..~ ~v Museum Sherbourne ~ i ~ & _._ ~ 0v q~.l0 ~ 0 "-' -~ ~ ~ ~ Yonge o Wellesley (!ID ~o 4..0 o~ ':,,,, -'~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ <:f> ~ef- v <?J,,, Queen's Park~,...<:- ~ ~ ~... :-..C/i o'i> 11,<:- o,~ ~ 04; ~, ' ~ <:> ~<:- v s1 Patrick O Osgoode 0 StAndrew,0 - ~ v,jo v"'.<f p..$, f!id o College 0 1 oundas ~ ~Queen O King Ellesmere ~ Lawrence East ~0 c,0<:' ~~ ~o d o -~'If l' ~ e:,v e Mccowan ~ 0 Union ~ Accessible Station ~ Interchange Station 1 Yonge-University Line e Bloor-Danforth Line e Scarborough Line C, Sheppard Line *At Spadina station, only Line 2 is accessible from street to subway platform Please use St George station for accessible transfers between Line 1 and Line 2 50

52

~ - ii:iclml 416-504-2667 co-opcabs.com 6/17/2015 53

6/17/2015 54

Wheel-Trans Demand 4.5 4 ' Annual Demand millions 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18 Year 55

Wheel-Trans maintain unaccommodated rate < 1% scheduling, service revisions increase capacity integration with conventional system improve efficiency: low-floor accessible streetcars more accessible subway stations AODA mandated eligibility conditional, temporary 6/17/2015 56

Wheel-Trans: Projected Modal Split 2015 Bus AT Sedan 29% 39% 32% Percentage of Trips by Mode 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 47% 29% 24% '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 Year Projections Bus AT Sedan

Wheel-Trans: Projected Usage by Mode By 2025: 25% of Demand on Integrated Conventional Services 25% 16% 39% 20% Bus AT Sedan Integrated

TTC Commuter Parking 6/17/2015 59

TTC Commuter Parking 14 stations 28 lots 12,300 spaces Finch East, West: biggest, growing market ~ 6 million transit trips annually net operating income + $4.3 million (41% margin) demand constrained by lack of capacity at half of lots 60

6/17/2015 61

TTC Commuter Parking 60% of spaces: temporary / long-term closures, relocations: Build Toronto, Metrolinx long-term forecast: 38% reduction Build Toronto Metrolinx: Eglinton LRT construction 750 spaces removed: Kennedy, Eglinton West 62

TTC Ridership Profile 57% are female 58% have driver s licence 66% have household vehicle 66% are employed 32% are students 6/17/2015 63

xa cp Age Distribution of TTC Customers?le. N oo> o,., 9< ~ o,., l"<?le. o< N 0,1 99 ~ II ~ 0,1 2"9 ~II- 09 0,1 9.s ~-- S'S' ~--- OS' ~11 S'.6 ~--- 0.6 ~--- S't" 8---- ~------ ~-------.-t ~11 S'l" o,., l".s o,., 9.6 0,1 l".6 0,1 9t" o,., ot".-t 0,1.sc.-t 0,1 oc l"t" 9~ l"~ o,., 92" 0,1 l"l" 64

65 Frequency of TTC Use Toronto Residents 0.9 0.8 ~ - 0.7 82% 75% 72% 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 - - - 24% 0.1 0 within last year at least once/month at least once/week at least once/day 65 TTC SP 06-1 2-2010 DAG. No. 1211 Ob

City Boundary H--+OlV,' l,'

~ TTC Annual Ridership ~ from 1995-2016, millions 560 545 ~ 540 535 million::::~~-~ 555 520 500 480 460 440 420 400 380 TIC SP05-02-2015 DAG. No. 12338 360 T, r T,- T r T, 1996 98 2000 02 04 06 08 2010 12 14 16,

Purpose of Travel on TTC Trip Purpose Percentage work 45% other school 28% 27% 6/17/2015 68

~ TTC Peak and Off-Peak Ridership ~ from 1995-2016, millions 350 325 300... 319 305 million ; 12 275 250 225 ~ -------------------~2=3=0~m: i:lli~o~n 236 233 200 175 150 1996 98 2000 02 ' ' ---.- =r F =r=..,.cspr- "')1!"..,..,.. No. 123.' 04 06 08 2010 12 14 16 69

Public Support for Transit in Toronto Ridership per Capita (using boardings) Agency / City Population Ridership per Capita York Region 1,055,558 30 Washington, DC 3,719,567 111 Vancouver 2,451,783 127 Chicago 3,425,958 154 TTC 2,825,620 295 Montréal 1,959,987 360 New York 8,008,278 432 6/17/2015 70

Productivity: Boardings per Service Hour 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 productivity: system-wide -- approximately 100 boardings / hour 6/17/2015 71

Comparison of Revenue / Cost Ratios City Revenue / Cost TTC 71% New York 58% Washington 50% Vancouver 44% Chicago 41% York Region 38% 6/17/2015 72

Subsidy / Rider Comparison Among Cities City Subsidy / Rider TTC $0.89 New York $1.14 Montréal $1.21 Vancouver Chicago $1.99 Washington York Region $1.63 $2.40 $4.34 6/17/2015 73

2015 Service Initiatives Council s $95 Million Investment in Better Service 74

Children Under 12 Ride Free 11 million annual customers make public transit more affordable for families children riders become adult riders 6/17/2015 75

All-Door Boarding & Proof-of-Payment 92 million annual customers speed-up time to serve stops: decreases travel times 6/17/2015 76

Subway Service Reliability 170 million annual customers running time adjustments, improved route management: peak periods, Lines 1, 2 improve reliability, reduce delays 6/17/2015 77

Subway Service Reliability Punctuality Line 1 Yonge-University Subway 100 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 Financial Periods 5/2013 to 4/2015 Actual Target 12 per. Mov. Avg. (Actual) 78

Subway Service Reliability improve reliability of signals, track, communication systems: reduce delays on subway 6/17/2015 79

Bus, Streetcar Service Reliability 44 million annual customers running time adjustments, improved route management: reduce short-turns, bunching, gapping on bus, streetcar routes 6/17/2015 80

81

504 King

29 Dufferin

STREETCAR Average Short Turns per Week 4500 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- 4000 -+-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3500..lll: a, a, 3 3000... a, Q. a, tll) 2500... co ~ co I II) 2000... c: ::::, I t: 0..c 1500 v, 1000 500 0 Actual 06/2013-05/2015

BUS TRANSPORTATION Average Short Turns per Week 3500 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3000 ~ 2500 Q.I ~... Q.I c. Q.I 2000 Q.O... ro Q.I > ro I Ill... c: ::::s I t: 0 ~ v, 1500 1000 500 0 Actua l 06/2013-05/ 2015

New Buses, Temporary Garage 50 million annual customers more buses for peak service (2016): new express services, reduced crowding, wait times 6/17/2015 86

Reduce Wait Times & Crowding 20 million annual customers restore 2012 service cuts on busiest bus, streetcar routes 2016: add peak service on 20+ routes in 25+ periods of operation 6/17/2015 87

Express Bus Network 30 million annual customers 2016: create new, improved express services peak, off-peak: faster, more-comfortable service for customers 6/17/2015 88

Overnight Network 5 million annual customers accommodate diverse travel needs in Toronto: 99% of Torontonians within 15-minute walk of service 6/17/2015 89

All-Day, Every-Day Service 77 million annual customers restore 2011 service cuts -- 43 routes, 122 periods of operation: customers can count on transit any time for their travel needs 6/17/2015 90

Ten-Minute-or-Better Network 48 million annual customers establish city-wide network of frequent bus, streetcar routes frequent, reliable service all day, all evening, every day 6/17/2015 91

Reduce Wait Times & Crowding 66 million annual customers restore 2012 service cuts on busiest bus, streetcar routes add off-peak service on 30 routes, 102 periods of operation 6/17/2015 92

~ TTC Annual Ridership ~ from 1995-2016, millions 560 545 ~ 540 535 million::::~~-~ 555 520 500 480 460 440 420 400 380 ~ more off-peak service reduced crowding, TIC SP 05-02-2015 DRG. No. 12338a 360 T, r,- T r T T 1996 98 2000 02 04 06 08 2010 12 14 16

2016 Operating Budget