Stormwater and sanitary sewer lines 8 inches in diameter or greater

Similar documents
EMERGING REQUIREMENTS

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

City of Houston Fondren Road Paving and Drainage

Traffic Engineering Study

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

Decision D ATCO Electric Ltd. Decommissioning of Transmission Line 6L82

traversing them. Speed dips may be installed in lieu of speed humps where the 85 th percentile speed on a street is at least 36 mph.

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

City of Palo Alto (ID # 6416) City Council Staff Report

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING ACTION ITEM. Design Endorsement for Sterling Boulevard Extension

H' f'~7~ :; DOWNTOWN UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING FEASIBILITY STUDY DRAFT. City of Roseburg, Oregon. December Engineers/Pbnners

City Hall 539 Phoenix Street South Haven, Michigan Telephone (269) Fax (269)

Public Meeting. SD Highway 28 From US81 W 11 miles through Lake Norden Hamlin County PH 0028(37)329 PCN 04JY

WELCOME PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE FOR US-64 FROM THE SH-18 INTERSECTION EAST 6.5 MILES JANUARY 10TH, 2017 PAWNEE CITY HALL, 5:30 PM

Submission on the Wellington Town Belt Bill. Local Government and Environment Select Committee Parliament Buildings Wellington

Rolling Road (Route 638) Widening Project

Business Advisory Committee. July 7, 2015

Utilities and Related Infrastructure

SPRINGWATER MISSING GAP Springwater Missing Gap Linking the Springwater on the Willamette Trail to the Springwater Corridor Trail June 2006

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Vantage to Pomona Heights Transmission Project Frequently asked questions

Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007

PROJECTS $500K AND OVER FOR 2012

SECTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT

Purpose and Need Report

APPENDIX C. Existing Utilities

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Update on Community or Heritage Rail Project (Project Manager Services) The Engineering Department recommends that Council:

Public Information Workshop

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

CHAIR AND MEMBERS CIVIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING ON FEBRUARY 6, 2018

See NT POWERCOS , Classification Based On Service Size.

Committee Report. Transportation Committee. Business Item No

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Federal Way Link Extension

Engineering Report: Shasta-Trinity National Forest. South Fork Management Unit. Analysis of. National Forest System Road 30N44

EXHIBIT A EAST VALLEY WATER DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF WATER AND WASTEWATER RATES AND CHARGES

This page is intentionally left blank.

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

Community Advisory Committee. October 5, 2015

Consumer Guidelines for Electric Power Generator Installation and Interconnection

Alberta Electric System Operator Needs Identification Document Application. Mowat 2033S Substation


Regarding: North Industrial Park/Infrastructure Build Project - Contractor Payments

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

Big Easy RV & Boat Storage A Green Energy Project Jana Lane Wildomar, California

747 ACRES LAND FOR SALE

CAPITAL FUND 9510 STREET & SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS

Dixie Transportation Planning Office

Final Report. LED Streetlights Market Assessment Study

JCP&L Verbatim Response to Middletown Township s Questions

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Energy Technical Memorandum

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

RECOMMENDATION PAPER TO THE DULLES CORRIDOR COMMITTEE

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 INTRODUCTION...3 PROJECTED FUTURE GROWTH...3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...4 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES...

Wheeler Ridge Junction Substation Project Description and Functional Specifications for Competitive Solicitation

CITY COUNCIL MEETING TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR MINUTES December 3, 2013

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

City of Lake Oswego Transportation System Plan Update PLAN AND POLICY REVIEW, PART 1

Alberta Electric System Operator Saleski Transmission Project Needs Identification Document

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

DRAFT Design Study Report February 2015 Eagle River Traffic Mitigation Phase 1 MOA Project No Appendix D Utilities

Herding Cats; Strategies used for KC Downtown Streetcar Utility Coordination ASCE Transportation Conference

/ Planning and Zoning Staff Report Lonestar Land, LLC. - Rezone, RZ

welcome to the BC Hydro community open house

REFINEMENT PHASE PRELIMINARY REPORT BRIEFING PAPER. DRAFT November 28, 2011

Schedule Based on the City of Los Angeles, the District should be formed by April 2016 to allow the design and construction to be complete by 2019.

Final Utility Assessment Package

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

Note: The October 2007 version of this report has been updated in this December 2008 report to present costs in year 2007 dollars.

TEMPORARY ELECTRICAL SERVICE

Decision D ATCO Electric Ltd. Decommissioning of Transmission Line 6L79. October 18, 2016

ATTACHMENT [B] PROJECT DESCRIPTION REQUESTED CITY OF LOS ANGELES ACTIONS

Supplement to ISO Transmission Plan. Harry Allen-Eldorado Project Description and Functional Specifications

The Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future

SPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS

Engineering Report: Shasta-Trinity National Forest. Trinity River Management Unit. Analysis of. National Forest System Road 37N08Y

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

The Narragansett Electric Company. d/b/a National Grid (Interstate Reliability Project) RIPUC Dkt. No Testimony of. David M. Campilii, P.E.

City of Salem. Transportation Systems Development Charge Update

SECTION 3 CUSTOMER CLASS SPECIFIC

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

IH 35 FEASIBILITY STUDY

Section III Transportation and Stormwater Projects Receiving Additional Funding Project Detail Sheets Alphabetical Listing by Project Name Five Year

Table of Contents PRIME INDUSTRIAL LAND. Arrowhead Drive /- acres Carson City, Nevada. For Sale $3.95 / SF

Link LRT: Maintenance Bases, Vehicles and Operations for ST2 Expansion

Proposed Downtown Miami Link

Information Meeting Transfer Station Options. September 30, 2014

TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING SERVICES: Street Project Management

. S RESOLUTION NO. 1645

M.P.S.C. No. 2 Electric Ninth Revised Sheet No. 50 (Rate Case) Cancels Eighth Revised Sheet No. 50

ADDITIONAL UTILITY RELOCATION COSTS ARE MISSING FROM THE ESTIMATE.

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The cost estimation methodology used to update the charges and credits is the same methodology the Company utilized in the prior year s filing.

Impacts of Hurricane Sandy to NYCDEP WWTPs and Pump Stations. December 12, 2012

SH 249 IN GRIMES COUNTY. Open House April 3, 2014

Transcription:

3.8 UTILITIES 3.8.1 Affected Environment This section describes the utility crossings and utilities located in the vicinity of the Preferred Alternative. The utilities include electricity, communication, natural gas, potable water, stormwater, and sanitary sewer lines. Due to the number and wide range of utilities in the project area, for the Tier 2 DEIS and FEIS, ODOT identified and evaluated the following utilities to determine the extent of impacts on utilities. Other utility lines are located in the project area. These will be identified and issues resolved on a case-by-case basis during project construction. Utilities are defined as: Electric lines of 12.5 kilovolts (kv) or greater Natural gas lines 4 inches in diameter or greater Stormwater and sanitary sewer lines 8 inches in diameter or greater Water lines 4 inches in diameter or greater Telecommunication lines SECTION CONTENTS 3.8.1 Affected Environment 3.8.2 Environmental Consequences 3.8.3 Cumulative Impacts for the Preferred Alternative 3.8.4 Mitigation 3.8.5 Tier 2 DEIS Build Alternative The locations of utilities are shown on maps included in the Newberg Dundee Bypass Utilities Technical Memorandum, ODOT 2012. These maps are not included in this document due to their large number and level of detail. A copy of the Utilities Technical Memorandum and Addendum is available from ODOT s Senior Project Leader, Region 2. Portland General Electric is the regional supplier of electricity in the project area. Its system includes both electric transmission and distribution lines. Transmission lines are 115 kv and located overhead on power poles. Distribution lines are 12.5 kv and mostly located overhead, but some distribution lines are located underground. Telecommunications include telephone, internet, cable, and cellular phone service and are delivered by three utilities: Frontier (formerly Verizon), T-Mobile and Comcast. Communication facilities in the project area include overhead and underground lines and cellular towers. NW Natural supplies the project area with natural gas through an underground network of gas transmission and distribution lines, and pressure-reducing and delivery-metering stations. Underground gas mains range in size from 4 to 13 inches in diameter. Newberg, Dundee, and Dayton public works departments supply water to their respective cities. Water mains and distribution lines range in size from 4 to 24 inches in diameter. Only Newberg and Dayton provide sewer service. Sewer lines range in size from 8 to 36 inches in diameter. Some of the sanitary sewer mains are combined stormwater/sewer lines, which also collect stormwater runoff. Newberg Dundee Bypass 3-315

3.8.2 Environmental Consequences 3.8.2.1 No Build Alternative Direct Impacts The No Build Alternative would not have required any major construction activities that would have directly affected utilities. The No Build Alternative projects included routine roadway maintenance such as resurfacing and minor safety/operation improvements, which may have included short-term interruptions of service. Indirect Impacts No indirect impacts were identified for the No Build Alternative. 3.8.2.2 Preferred Alternative Direct Impacts The Preferred Alternative will directly impact overhead and underground utilities including power, natural gas, communications, water, and sewer in the project area. These utilities will probably be relocated or abandoned in place so that the Preferred Alternative and local circulation changes can be built. ODOT will notify utility service providers of utility conflicts with the Preferred Alternative and service providers will notify ODOT of their relocation plans. Operation of the Preferred Alternative will increase electricity demand for lighting and signal operation. Existing electrical capacity is adequate to serve the project without adversely affecting supply. ODOT will construct most of the Preferred Alternative on newly acquired right-of-way and therefore will be responsible for reimbursement of the cost to relocate existing utilities, which need to stay in service. For this, ODOT developed an order of magnitude cost for utility relocation including an overall cost estimate. This estimate does not include the costs of minor utilities or associated costs such as permit fees. ODOT estimates the cost of utility relocations to be approximately $15.2 million in 2015 dollars. Table PA 3.8-1 provides a utility relocation cost breakdown by project segment. For individual utility relocation costs, refer to the Newberg Dundee Bypass Utilities Technical Memorandum and Addendum, ODOT 2011. Permit research and determination of cost responsibilities between each service provider and ODOT are not complete. ODOT will identify details related to utility cost responsibilities during project final design. Table PA 3.8-1. Summary of Preferred Alternative Direct Impacts to Utilities Segment Relocation Costs b 1 Electric lines, water lines, and $1.8 million 2 c Electric lines and $0.8 million 3 Electric lines and $0.1 million 4 Electric lines, a gas main, water lines, and $0.8 million 5 Electric lines, water mains, storm and sanitary sewer pipes, high-pressure gas mains, and telecommunication and cable lines $2.1 million 6 Electric lines, one gas main,, water pipes, and storm sewer pipes $4.3 million 3-316 Newberg Dundee Bypass

Table PA 3.8-1. Summary of Preferred Alternative Direct Impacts to Utilities Segment Relocation Costs b 7 Electric lines, several gas mains, water and sanitary sewer lines, and 8.1 and 8.1A a Electric lines, several gas mains, water and storm drainage lines, and Total $1.0 million $4.3 million $15.2 million Source: Newberg Dundee Bypass Tier 2 Final Utilities Technical Memorandum, ODOT 2012. a Costs for Segments 8.1 and 8.1A have not been separated. b Utility relocation cost in 2015 dollars. c Relocation costs for the cell phone tower are included in the right-of-way costs. ODOT will not be responsible for the cost of relocation in areas where the Preferred Alternative crosses or improves an existing state highway and the utility is located there by permit (see sidebar). In that instance the service provider will be responsible for relocation costs. For example, providers of existing utilities that are located within the rights-of-way of Oregon 18, Oregon 219, and Oregon 99W will be responsible for relocation costs. ORS 366.321 requires ODOT to pay reasonable reimbursement costs for relocating utilities of any municipal corporation or district located on public right-of-way. There is an exception to this requirement where the relocated utilities are located on a state highway by a permit issued by ODOT. Indirect Impacts No indirect impacts are expected because no other projects of a similar magnitude are planned for the area. Construction Impacts Construction impacts include short-term interruption of service to customers during the Preferred Alternative construction period. 3.8.2.3 Phase 1 Phase 1 of the Preferred Alternative (Phase 1) will include utility relocation costs for areas along Springbrook Road in East Newberg and along Oregon 99W just south of Dundee, that were not included in the Tier 2 DEIS. ODOT estimates the cost of utility relocations for Phase 1 to be approximately $4.9 million in 2015 dollars. Table PA 3.8-2 provides a utility relocation cost breakdown by project segment. For individual utility relocation costs, refer to the Newberg Dundee Bypass Utilities Technical Memorandum, ODOT 2012. Permit research and determination of cost responsibilities between each service provider and ODOT are not complete. ODOT will identify details related to utility cost responsibilities during project final design. Table PA 3.8-2. Summary of Phase 1 Direct Impacts to Utilities Segment Relocation Costs 2 Electric lines and $0.2 million 3 Electric lines and $0.1 million 4 Electric lines, a gas main, water lines, and None Newberg Dundee Bypass 3-317

Segment Table PA 3.8-2. Summary of Phase 1 Direct Impacts to Utilities 5 Electric lines, water mains, storm and sanitary sewer pipes, high-pressure gas mains, and telecommunication and cable lines Relocation Costs $2.1 million 6 East Newberg $2.5 million Total $4.9 million Source: Newberg Dundee Bypass Tier 2 Final Utilities Technical Memorandum, ODOT 2012. 3.8.3 Cumulative Impacts for the Preferred Alternative As the Preferred Alternative project area is developed in the future, new utilities will be constructed and modernized. All utilities impacted during the construction of the proposed project will probably be replaced, reconstructed and/or realigned. The long-term level of service from service providers will not be compromised; therefore, no cumulative impacts to utilities will occur. 3.8.4 Mitigation 3.8.4.1 Preferred Alternative ODOT anticipates that all utility relocation will be complete prior to construction. During construction, ODOT will coordinate with service providers to minimize disruption of service and will give local businesses and neighborhoods early notification of service disruptions. 3.8.4.2 Phase 1 There are no additional mitigation measures for Phase 1 that are not listed for the Preferred Alternative. 3-318 Newberg Dundee Bypass

3.8.5 Tier 2 DEIS Build Alternative The following is an exact copy of the Tier 2 DEIS Build Alternative section for utilities. Intext references cite information in the Tier 2 DEIS. The Tier 2 DEIS Build Alternative, which includes all of the design and local circulation options no longer under consideration, is included here as a comparison to the Tier 2 FEIS Preferred Alternative and for informational purposes only. Copies of the complete Tier 2 DEIS are available from: Kelly Amador, Senior Project Leader, Region 2 Oregon Department of Transportation Mid-Willamette Valley Area 885 Airport Road SE, Building P Salem, OR 97301-4788 kelly.l.amador@odot.state.or.us 3.8.2.2 Build Alternative Direct and Indirect Impacts Operation of the Bypass would increase demand for electricity, which would be needed for lighting and signals. Existing electrical capacity is adequate to serve the project without adversely affecting supply. Indirect impacts include short-term interruption of service to customers during the Bypass construction period. Construction of the Build Alternative would directly impact overhead and underground utilities including power, natural gas, communications, water, and sewer in the project area. These utilities would be relocated or abandoned in place so that the Bypass and local circulation changes could be built. Refer to the Newberg Dundee Bypass Utilities Technical Memorandum for specific utility lines that would be affected. This would directly impact utilities in several ways: (1) it would require utilities to negotiate and/or modify easements with private landowners, (2) it would use utility staff resources to plan, design, site and permit facilities, (3) it may increase costs of utility operation, and (4) it may include short-term interruptions of service to customers during the construction period. For the Tier 2 DEIS, an order of magnitude cost for utility relocation was developed and included in the overall cost estimate. This estimate does not include the costs of minor utilities or associated costs such as permit fees. The cost of utility relocations, depending on the design option, is estimated to range from $12.8 to $13.7 million in 2015 dollars. Table 3.8-1 provides a utility relocation cost breakdown by project segment. For individual utility relocation costs, refer to the Newberg Dundee Bypass Utilities Technical Memorandum. Permit research has not been completed, and cost responsibilities between each service provider and ODOT have not yet been calculated. Further details related to utility cost responsibilities will be identified during project final design. Table 3.8-1. Summary of Utilities Direct Impacts Segment Relocation Costs b 1 Electric lines, water lines, and $1.8 million 2 c Electric lines and $0.6 million 3 Electrical lines and $0.1 million Newberg Dundee Bypass 3-319

Table 3.8-1. Summary of Utilities Direct Impacts Segment Relocation Costs b 4 Electrical lines, a gas main, water lines, and 5 Electrical lines, water mains, storm and sanitary sewer pipes, high-pressure gas mains, and telecommunication and cable lines 6 Electrical lines, one gas main,, water pipes, and storm sewer pipes 7 Electrical lines, several gas mains, water and sanitary sewer lines, and telecommunication lines 8.1 and 8.1A a Electrical lines, several gas mains, water and storm drainage lines, and telecommunication lines Total $0.8 million $2.1 2.6 million $2.1 million $1.0 1.4 million $4.3 million $12.8-13.7 million Source: Newberg Dundee Bypass Utilities Technical Memorandum, ODOT 2009. a Costs for Segments 8.1 and 8.1A have not been separated. b Utility relocation cost in 2015 dollars. c Relocation costs for the cell phone tower are included in the right of way costs. Most of the Bypass would be constructed on newly acquired right-of-way. Therefore, ODOT would be responsible for reimbursement of the cost to relocate existing utilities which need to stay in service (i.e., $12.8 to $13.7 million). The exception to this would be in areas where the Bypass crosses or improves an existing state highway and the utility is located there by permit (see sidebar). In that instance the service provider would be responsible for relocation costs. For example, providers of existing utilities that are located within the rightsof-way of Oregon 18, Oregon 219, and Oregon 99W would be responsible for relocation costs. ORS 366.321 requires ODOT to pay reasonable reimbursement costs for relocating utilities of any municipal corporation or district located on public right-of-way. There is an exception to this requirement where the relocated utilities are located on a state highway by a permit issued by ODOT. 3-320 Newberg Dundee Bypass