Module K Quality Function Deployment

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2003

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release.

The New ISO/CD Standard

New Automotive Innovation and Growth Team (NAIGT)

Webasto Service 360. The best approach to an optimal solution is all-round.

AOPA Summit. Unleaded Avgas Transition Aviation Rulemaking Committee (UAT-ARC) UAT ARC. Presented to: By: Date:

EV ELECTRIFICATION FOR SUSTAINABLE PROFITABILITY

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

Formation and finishing

Brochure. Synchronous generators for steam and gas turbines Proven generators reliable power

VGI Communications Protocols. April 2018

Study on Rotorcraft Safety and Survivability

Microgrid with Solar Power and Fuel Cell Technology

MAT4BAT summer school Battery industry prospective in Europe and new technologies. C. Chanson

Industry-Wide Light Duty Hydrogen Vehicle Fueling Protocol up to 70MPa: Created by Math Modeling and Confirmed by System Testing

Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Project Overview. Sustainable Mobility Project 2.0 Mobilitätsbeirat Hamburg 01. July 2015

EMC System Engineering of the Hybrid Vehicle Electric Motor and Battery Pack

Agenda. Industrial software systems at ABB. Case Study 1: Robotics system. Case Study 2: Gauge system. Summary & outlook

Manufacturing Implications within. new DODI (Dec 8, 2008) Summary for Industry. National Center For Advanced Technologies.

Technological Viability Evaluation. Results from the SWOT Analysis Diego Salzillo Arriaga, Siemens

Designing evtol for the Mission NDARC NASA Design and Analysis of Rotorcraft. Wayne Johnson From VTOL to evtol Workshop May 24, 2018

emover AMBIENT MOBILITY Jens Dobberthin Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO e : t :

NORWAY Industrial Participation. 25 January 2007

ASCENT - FAA Center of Excellence for Alternative Jet Fuels and Environment

Integrated Architectures Management, Behavior models, Controls and Software

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) February 2000

Development of Japan s Next Flagship Launch Vehicle

Podium Engineering complete race cars, vehicle prototypes high performance hybrid/electric powertrain

Outline. Background Performed evaluations. General experiences Future work. ATAM Experiences. Architecture used in 3O3P project SA-AFL architecture

ASME Human Powered Vehicle

PEAK DEMAND MANAGEMENT IN NEW ENGLAND A DYNAMIC SOLUTION TO MANAGING PEAK DEMAND CHARGES

Development of Business Cases for Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Applications for Regions and Cities. FCH Aircraft

Military, Aerospace, and Manufacturing Test Solutions

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

Making Decisions. Focus: Semi-structured decisions Analytic v. Heuristic Decisions in the Problem Solving Phases Multiple-Criteria Methods

Decisions, Decisions: What Drives Shopping Choices for Vehicle Re-Purchasers?

2 nd Generation Charging Station

Weaponizing Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Cody Tretschok Capture Manager, Advanced UAS Weapons Advanced Missiles and Unmanned Systems

Using CREATE s Rapid Ship Design Environment to Perform Design Space Exploration for a Ship Design

Consumers, Vehicles and Energy Integration (CVEI) project

The leader in clean electric transportation. Corporate Overview NASDAQ: ECTY April 20, 2011

Method for the estimation of the deformation frequency of passenger cars with the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS)

Clutch Release Bearings and Components

Utility and project update 2-3 Project description 4

AIRCRAFT AND TECHNOLOGY CONCEPTS FOR AN N+3 SUBSONIC TRANSPORT. Elena de la Rosa Blanco May 27, 2010

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Avon Products, Inc. Particulars. RSPO Annual Communications of Progress Particulars Form. About Your Organisation. 1.1 Name of your organization

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Aerospace Propulsion and Power Technology

Frequently Misunderstood CMMI Appraisal Findings

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Joint Gun Effectiveness Model (JGEM) Navy Accredited Minor/Medium Caliber Operational Tool

Mechanism Feasibility Design Task

ODIN FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM

Baugh Wind Energy Design Competition Saturday, 9 February 2019

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Navis NavDP 4000 Series

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

Annual press conference on April 29, 2015 Press images

BMW GROUP DIALOGUE. HANGZHOU 2017 TAKE AWAYS.

Will Policy Be The Tipping Point?

QFD example in. Ing. Inga Chudjakova Ing. Jaromír Tobiška

Cooperative Research Centre for Advanced Automotive Technology

Strategy for Promoting Centers of Excellence (CoE) Activities

LMS Imagine.Lab AMESim Ground Loads and Flight Controls

Classical Aircraft Sizing I

Methodologies and Examples for Efficient Short and Long Duration Integrated Occupant-Vehicle Crash Simulation

THE FKFS 0D/1D-SIMULATION. Concepts studies, engineering services and consulting

BCUC Project No INTRODUCTION

Establishment of Light Tactical Vehicles Program Office

Cluster Knowledge and Skills for Business, Management and Administration Finance Marketing, Sales and Service Aligned with American Careers Business

The allure is obvious. Hardware wins can be gigantic. IOT will push $250B, robotics $135B, and drones $100B.

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

SEASPRITE. SH-2G Super MODERN MARITIME SOLUTION

KONGSBERG DEFENCE & AEROSPACE

Enhancing T&E and SE Alignment Using Database Driven Documentation

Siemens PLM Software develops advanced testing methodologies to determine force distribution and visualize body deformation during vehicle handling.

Innovation a Strategic Success Factor for Evonik

Labelling Smart Roads DISCUSSION PAPER 4/2015

Coordinating Process Improvement in Multiple Geographically Dispersed Development Organizations Using CMMI. Aldo Dagnino and Andrew Cordes

Industrial machinery and heavy equipment. Hatz Diesel. Developing a water-cooled industrial engine with the help of Siemens PLM Software

Colgate-Palmolive Company

NDIA Tactical Wheeled Vehicles (TWV) Conference 8 February 2010 COL Mark Barbosa, G-8

Hydro Plant Risk Assessment Guide

Russian Truck Market Strategy Study

Southern California Edison Rule 21 Storage Charging Interconnection Load Process Guide. Version 1.1

If searched for a ebook Ford qos manual in pdf form, then you have come on to the loyal website. We present the full release of this book in epub,

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA S COMBAT SUPPORT LOGISTICS AGENCY

The AutomotiveINNOVATIONS Award 2013: Volkswagen continues to be the most innovative OEM Mercedes-Benz wins in the brand ranking

Technology for the Future of Vertical Lift

Green Mobility Technology Roadmap

Statement of Jim Schoppenhorst, Director, DD(X) BAE Systems / Armament Systems Division. Before the

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

THE FRANCHISE GIANT. Three Strategies for Competing With the Big Boys DEALERSOCKET.COM/IND

Overview of ISO 9001 and ISO 14001

AN ANALYSIS OF DRIVER S BEHAVIOR AT MERGING SECTION ON TOKYO METOPOLITAN EXPRESSWAY WITH THE VIEWPOINT OF MIXTURE AHS SYSTEM

Discovery of Design Methodologies. Integration. Multi-disciplinary Design Problems

Transcription:

Module K Quality Function Deployment CC04264166.ppt

QFD Overview Objectives Define QFD List benefits of QFD Outline QFD matrix process Summarize CC04264167.ppt

Quality Function Deployment Quality What the customer/user needs or expects Function How those needs or expectations are to be satisfied Deployment Making it happen throughout the organization CC04264168.ppt

Multiple customers Competing alternatives Multiple suppliers Decision Analysis Provides Focus Multiple objectives * Quality Function Deployment Communication Multiple disciplines Conflicting interests Decision Analysis and QFD provide more customer interaction and a better product Consensus common terminology List of potential trades ranked priorities Documentation CC04264169.ppt

QFD Origins and Usage HIN SHITSU KI NO TEN KAI Quality Function Deployment Originated in early 1970's at Mitsubishi's Kobe shipyard Used worldwide by the automotive industry (Ford Taurus) Wide use by Japanese consumer electronics industry Increasing use by U.S. computer/electronics industry Increasing use by U.S. defense community customers and suppliers DoD TQM guidebook 5000.51G IDA report on concurrent engineering Increasing recognition as an effective mechanism for strategic planning and process improvement CC04264170.ppt

QFD Overview Objectives Define QFD List benefits of QFD Outline QFD matrix process Summarize CC04264171.ppt

Key Benefits of QFD Quality Allows organization and leveling of requirements Helps optimize product and process designs Cost Streamlines requirements iteration process Reduces number of engineering changes Shortens product development cycle Communication Emphasizes the Voice of the Customer Provides common language and data base Promotes understanding of multi-discipline requirements Documentation Provides continuous, comprehensive evaluations and sensitivities Produces a detailed/living documentation trail CC04264172.ppt

QFD Contributes to Quality Improvement Identify Needs Plan, Prioritize, Focus Make Improvements Hold the Gains Satisfy Needs Customer Quality Function Deployment Design of Experiment s (Taguchi) Statistical Process Control Product Cost of Design Changes QFD is best used here Production Begins Time QFD is part of Total Quality Management Recognized and accepted process Ready-made sales tool 0 CC04264173.ppt

QFD Can Support the Entire Product Development Cycle Customer expectations Design specification Part characteristics Manufacturing operations Production requirements QFD can help structure strategy, programs and products CC04264174.ppt

When Is QFD Helpful Focus on People Multiple customers or users Conflicting customer priorities Multiple disciplines involved User requirements not quantifiable Focus on Solutions Multiple feasible solutions Solutions conflict with each other Solution not yet quantified Everyday problems! CC04264175.ppt

QFD Analysis Products A prioritized list customer wants (requirements) A prioritized list of how you may satisfy the customer s wants (solution) A common set of definitions for requirements and solutions A list of potential trades A basis for identifying and selecting concepts More customer interaction Leads to a better product CC04264176.ppt

QFD Overview Objectives Define QFD List benefits of QFD Outline QFD matrix process Summarize CC04264177.ppt

Decision Analysis Using QFD QFD is a structured, matrix-based process for exploring solutions to complex problems Articulate and define problems - WHAT specifics are desired? Determine relative importance of each to the owner Survey the range of solutions - HOW are specifics achieved? Access value/importance of solutions Decompose solutions into next set of WHATs and HOWs Each assessment and decision is documented. All steps are easily traced CC04264178.ppt

QFD Is Documented in a House of Quality The QFD process is designed to emphasize drivers, not details WHATs HOWs Prioritized HOWs Pritorized WHATs QFD is not difficult but experience is helpful CC04264179.ppt

The House of Quality Is Completed Using a Sequence of Steps These steps are typical of most QFD applications 0 Identify scope, constraints, and groundrules 1 Identify the customer requirements (WHATs) 2 Prioritize customer requirements 3 Identify the competing solutions (HOWs) 4 Relate HOWs to WHATs 5 Correlate the competing solutions (HOWs) 6 Evaluate the competing solutions (HOWs) 7 Flowdown to next QFD matrix Don t forget definitions 5 (if necessary) 3 1 4 2 6 7 CC04264180.ppt

Design specifications Flow Down Matrices to Increase the Level of Detail Customer requirements Product planning matrix Design specifications Part characteristics Part deployment matrix Part characteristics Makabe System American Supplier Institute Template - automobile industry Manufacturing operations Process planning matrix Manufacturing operations Production requirements Production planning matrix CC04264181.ppt

QFD Overview Objectives Define QFD List benefits of QFD Outline QFD matrix process Summarize CC04264182.ppt

QFD Is a Method - Not a Panacea QFD is not: A black box A software package The Answer Boeing QFD for: Strategy Programs Product lines QFD is: A matrix-based decision analysis tool A structured process for exploring solutions to complex problems A means to capture and quantify expert judgement QFD emphasizes customer interaction and leads to a better product CC04264183.ppt

Recent QFD Applications at Boeing Policy/Goal Development Turbine engine technology NASA strategic planning NASA risk management DoN requirements Joint Warfare Assessment Center Concept Selection JASSM External weapons carriage DAC advanced common flightdeck DAC C-9B replacement Anti-Jam CCS JDAM PIP Arsenal ship Legend Gov t funded Internal Boeing effort Force Structure Overseas presence Cruise missile defense N513 Mission Needs ASC / XR SOF STT Systems Engineering Process Improvement Low cost commercial technology insertion Electronic warfare acquisition for tactical aircraft NASA risk management NATO AGARD Manufacturing Process Improvement Integrated manufacturing control system Manufacturing work instructions Diverse spectrum of QFD subjects from requirements to manufacturing Requirements Development Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Common Support Aircraft (CSA) C 2 W follow-on systems technology Technology Prioritization JAST II High lift/drag technology Proprietary subcontractor selection Wright lab munitions tech planning F-18F aft crew station enhancements CC04264184.ppt

Example QFD Analysis Selecting a Requirements Management Tool RDD-100 DOORS RTM Req Pro # Requirements Relation Rel*WF Relation Rel*WF Relation Rel*WF Relation Rel*WF Weighting Factor, % 1 Requirements Traceability 9 180 9 180 9 180 9 180 20 2 User Friendly 1 10 3 30 3 30 3 30 10 3 Boeing Std. Tool 9 90 9 90 3 30 1 10 10 4 In-House Training 9 90 9 90 1 10 1 10 10 5 Available at Team Mates 1 10 3 30 1 10 1 10 10 6 Boeing Experts Available 9 81 9 81 1 9 1 9 9 7 PC Operation 9 72 9 72 9 72 9 72 8 8 Report Capability 9 45 9 45 9 45 3 15 5 9 Use on DD21 1 5 9 45 1 5 1 5 5 10 Cost 1 5 9 45 9 45 9 45 5 11 WORD Interface 1 5 3 15 9 45 9 45 5 12 Web Browser 1 1 3 3 9 9 1 1 1 13 Unix Operation 9 9 9 9 9 9 1 1 1 14 Data Base 3 3 1 1 9 9 3 3 1 15 Functional Analysis 9 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Relative Scores 606 736 508 436 100 Relational Score 9-Strong 3-Moderate 1-Weak Winner CC04264xxx.ppt