RSA Protective Technologies

Similar documents
FAAC International, Inc.

CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH Anti-Ram Bollards

CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH Anti-Ram Bollards

Virginia Department of Transportation

The Center for Auto Safety

The Center for Auto Safety

CRASH TESTING OF RSA/K&C ANTI-RAM FOUNDATION BOLLARD PAD IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIPLOMATIC SECURITY SD-STD-02.

REPORT NUMBER TR-P NC SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 124 ACCELERATOR CONTROL SYSTEMS

ASTM F TEST M30 ON THE RSS-3000 DROP BEAM SYSTEM

COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 207 SEATING SYSTEMS

REPORT NO. TR-P NC SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 223 REAR IMPACT GUARDS 2007 TRANSFREIGHT TECHNOLOGY NHTSA NO.

REPORT NUMBER TR-P NC SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 124 ACCELERATOR CONTROL SYSTEMS CHRYSLER LLC 2009 DODGE JOURNEY 5-DOOR MPV

REPORT NUMBER: 301-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY HONDA MOTOR COMPANY 2007 HONDA ACCORD 4-DOOR SEDAN

REPORT NUMBER: 301-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT FORD MOTOR COMPANY 2009 FORD F150 2-DOOR PICKUP

Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Protocol (Version II) February 2019

STI Project: Barrier Systems, Inc. RTS-QMB Longitudinal Barrier. Page 38 of 40 QBOR1. Appendix F (Continued) Figure F-3

Draft for comments only Not to be cited as East African Standard

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Toyota Camry

CNG Fuel System Integrity

REPORT NUMBER: 301-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT

NCHRP Report 350 Test 4-12 of the Modified Thrie Beam Guardrail

ISO 8855 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Road vehicles Vehicle dynamics and road-holding ability Vocabulary

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Chevrolet Malibu

TEST REPORT FOR: The Tracy Law Firm Honda Fit 5-Door Hatchback TESTED TO: 64.4 km/h 40% Moderate Overlap Frontal Impact PREPARED FOR:

COMPARISON BETWEEN FMVSS No. 206 and ECE R11

REPORT NUMBER: 301-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION 2008 MAZDA CX-9 SUV

Fuel System Integrity

Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301R FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301R FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301R FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT

SIDE IMPACT IIHS. Page 1 / 7. MESSRING Systembau MSG GmbH. Printing errors and omissions reserved

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Toyota Prius

Pedestrian Autonomous Emergency Braking Test Protocol (Version 1) December 2018

February 8, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/CC-104

STATUS OF NHTSA S EJECTION MITIGATION RESEARCH. Aloke Prasad Allison Louden National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

July 10, Refer to: HSA-10/CC-78A

TEST METHODS CONCERNING TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Scion xb

SPCT Method. The SPCT Method - Testing of Dog Crates. Utskrivet dokument är ostyrt, dvs inte säkert gällande.

State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation for Motor Vehicles. Protocol No. 1003/UO/MMB/W/94-12

Technical Product Sheet

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301R FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT

CLASSIFICATION NOTES. Type Testing Procedure for. Crankcase Explosion Relief Valves

ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS

EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF OCCUPANT ENTRAPMENT FORD TAURUS INTO REAR OF FORD EXPLORER 30% OFFSET, 70 MPH. Test Date: August 3, 2010

Crashworthiness Evaluation Offset Barrier Crash Test Protocol (Version III) June 1996

mga research corporation

CAPT JT Elder Commanding Officer NSWC Crane

Low-Speed Crash Test Protocol (Version V) May 2002

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Road vehicles Brake lining friction materials Friction behaviour assessment for automotive brake systems

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 111. REARVIEW MIRRORS (Other Than School Buses)

SURFACE VEHICLE STANDARD

EFFECTIVENESS OF COUNTERMEASURES IN RESPONSE TO FMVSS 201 UPPER INTERIOR HEAD IMPACT PROTECTION

This document is a preview generated by EVS

ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS

ISO 2953 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Mechanical vibration Balancing machines Description and evaluation

Safe-Stop TMA (Truck Mounted Attenuator) GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

ROLLOVER CRASHWORTHINESS OF A RURAL TRANSPORT VEHICLE USING MADYMO

CRASH TEST AND EVALUATION OF TEMPORARY WOOD SIGN SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR LARGE GUIDE SIGNS

TEST METHOD Booster Seats. May 2012R January 1, Revised: Issued: (Ce document est aussi disponible en français)

SHORT PAPER PCB OBLIQUE COLLISIONS ENGINEERING EQUATIONS, INPUT DATA AND MARC 1 APPLICATIONS. Dennis F. Andrews, Franco Gamero, Rudy Limpert

RCAR Bumper Test. Issue 2.1. February 2018

*Friedman Research Corporation, 1508-B Ferguson Lane, Austin, TX ** Center for Injury Research, Santa Barbara, CA, 93109

TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS

TITLE: EVALUATING SHEAR FORCES ALONG HIGHWAY BRIDGES DUE TO TRUCKS, USING INFLUENCE LINES

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

Bumper Test Protocol (Version VII) June 2009

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 111. REARVIEW MIRRORS (Other Than School Buses)

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 202a Head Restraints

600 Amp Surge Arrester

SFI SPECIFICATION 35.2 EFFECTIVE: DECEMBER 29, 2014 *

Methodologies and Examples for Efficient Short and Long Duration Integrated Occupant-Vehicle Crash Simulation

ALPHA 70K TMA (Truck Mounted Attenuator) GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

Crashworthiness Evaluation. Roof Strength Test Protocol (Version III)

Test Procedure for Measuring Fuel Economy and Emissions of Trucks Equipped with Aftermarket Devices

Incomplete Vehicle Document 2014 Model Year NOTE:

VERIFICATION & VALIDATION REPORT of MGS Barrier Impact with 1100C Vehicle Using Toyota Yaris Coarse FE Model

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Wheelchair seating Part 4: Seating systems for use in motor vehicles

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE THE TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77843

Headlight Test and Rating Protocol (Version I)

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 111. REARVIEW MIRRORS (Other Than School Buses)

SHOCK TESTING OF EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS NAVAL APPLICATIONS

5. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY 5.1 STRUCTURAL STRENGTH AND DISTORTION TESTS - STRUCTURAL SHAKEDOWN TEST 5.1-I. DISCUSSION

FE151 Aluminum Association Inc. Impact of Vehicle Weight Reduction on a Class 8 Truck for Fuel Economy Benefits

SUMMARY OF STANDARD K&C TESTS AND REPORTED RESULTS

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Stakeholder Meeting: FMVSS Considerations for Automated Driving Systems

2.0 TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS Vibration Test TEST EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 7 ATTACHMENTS

City of Storm Lake Fire Department Heavy Rescue Specifications

Form DOT F (8-72) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

SURFACE VEHICLE RECOMMENDED PRACTICE

Loose Ship Park Assist and Park View System

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY

GENERAL TESTING LABORATORIES, INC LEEDSTOWN ROAD COLONIAL BEACH, VIRGINIA 22443

EDR Report Information

Optimal Design Solutions for Two Side SORB using Bumper Design Space. SMDI Bumper Group - Detroit Engineered Products

Outline. Improving the Dynamic Performance of Truck/Full- Trailers. Background Feric research. Questions

Occupant Restraint Systems in Frontal Impact

Common position by FR and CEMA on mechanical couplings for towed vehicles 28/9/2015

Transcription:

TEST REPORT FOR: RSA Protective Technologies K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System TESTED TO: ASTM F 2656-07 Standard Test Method for Vehicle Crash Testing of Perimeter Barriers Test M50 PREPARED FOR: Battelle Memorial Institute 1550 Crystal Drive, Ste 600 Arlington, VA 22202 TEST REPORT NUMBER: REPORT DATE: February 13, 2012 TEST DATE: January 18, 2012 KARCO Engineering, LLC. Automotive Research Center 9270 Holly Road Adelanto, CA 92301 Tel: (760) 246-1672 Fax: (760) 246-8112

KARCO Engineering compiled this publication for information gathering only. The findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of any other organization. KARCO Engineering provides test services only and is not involved in consulting, product design or the manufacturing of any automotive products. KARCO does not warrant, supervise or monitor compliance of products or services except as specifically agreed to in writing. By their very nature, testing, analysis and other KARCO services are limited in scope and subject to expected measurement variability. No activity by KARCO Engineering can release a manufacturer from product or any other liability. The results, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication relate only to the items tested for the specific situation simulated in the test. Tested By: Report By: Reviewed By: Approved By: Mr. Kelsey A. Chiu Engineering Department Supervisor Mr. Kelsey A. Chiu Engineering Department Supervisor Mr. Matthew S. Hubbard Quality Assurance Manager Mr. Michael L. Dunlap Director of Operations Approval Date: February 13, 2012 i

REVISION CONTROL LOG TR-P31094-01 Revision Date Description -NC 02/13/12 Original Test Report ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 Introduction 1 2 Test Article Details 6 3 Test Results 7 4 Data Sheets 8 Table Page 1 Test Vehicle Properties 2 2 Penetration Ratings 4 Data Sheet Page 1 Test Vehicle Information 9 2 Test Vehicle Geometry 10 3 Impact Conditions 11 4 Evaluation of Test Results 12 5 Observations 13 6 Sensor Data 14 Appendix Page A Photographs A B Data Plots B C Data Acquisition Information C D Drawings and Illustrations D Final Page of Report D-6 iii

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this impact test was to determine a penetration rating for the RSA Protective Technologies K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System (test article) per the ASTM F 2656-07 Standard Test Method for Vehicle Crash Testing of Perimeter Barriers to the M50 level. The intent of this test was to evaluate the ability of the barrier to arrest a 6,800 kg (15,000 lb) vehicle from penetrating or vaulting a secured area and the extent, if any, of barrier deformation. This report presents the results of the performance and evaluation of one (1) full-scale impact test conducted on one (1) RSA K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System to the M50 (80 km/h, 50 mph) level. Testing and reporting of test results are described in the test procedure and are not repeated in this report. 1.2 TEST FACILITY This test was conducted at KARCO Engineering s test facility in Adelanto, California. The tow road is a continuous level surface constructed of reinforced concrete and measures 850 feet in length, is 14 feet wide, and 6 in. thick. A steel rail is embedded in the road to provide vehicle guidance. Vehicle tow propulsion is provided by a 1 ton truck using a 1-to-2 pulley system coupled to a fixed prime mover (an internal combustion engine, Chevrolet V-8, 454 cubic inch displacement, with TH-400 automatic transmission) and continuous cable drive system. The test vehicle is towed to within 25 feet of the barrier by a nylon rope clamped to a 3/8-inch steel cable. The clamp is released from the cable on contact with a cable release mechanism positioned to allow the test vehicle to proceed under its own momentum for a maximum of 25 feet before impacting the barrier. 1.3 TEST PROCEDURE The RSA K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System was tested per ASTM F 2656-07 Standard Test Method for Vehicle Crash Testing of Perimeter Barriers. This ASTM standard contains specific requirements for test article installation, vehicle properties, impact conditions, test instrumentation, and evaluation criterion. 1.3.1 Test Article Installation The materials, assembly instructions, and physical configuration of the test article are specified in the manufacturer s literature and are not repeated in this test report. Installation of 1

the test article was conducted by Desert Construction Services and KARCO Engineering, LLC. The test article, as installed at the test facility, is illustrated in Appendices A and D. 1.3.2 Test Vehicle Properties ASTM F 2656-07 specifies four (4) different vehicle levels for possible penetration ratings: C (Small Passenger Car), P (Pickup Truck), M (Medium Duty Truck) and H (Heavy Goods Vehicle). All test vehicles must be structurally sound with no major damage or modifications and must have original equipment bumpers. Tire sizes shall be those recommended by the vehicle manufacturer unless otherwise specified by a specific agency. Test Vehicle properties for each vehicle is presented in Table 1. Table 1 Test Vehicle Properties Small Passenger Medium Duty Heavy Goods Pickup Truck Vehicle Type Car Truck Vehicle C P M H Gross Vehicle Test Mass (kg) 1,100 ± 20 2,300 ± 50 6,800 ± 140 29,500 ± 590 Year Within 10 Model Within 10 Model Years Years Wheelbase (m) 5.28 ± 0.51 Bed Length (m) 5.49 ± 0.61 Other Sedan or Coupe 3/4 Ton, Single Cab Flatbed Tandem Axle Dump Truck or Drop Axle Truck This test of the RSA K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System was conducted with the M test vehicle. To meet the recommended properties a commercially available production model test vehicle was selected. This test vehicle was a 1988 GMC Topkick 7000 medium duty truck with conventional cab, front mounted diesel engine, rear wheel drive, and an automatic transmission. The bumpers were standard equipment and were not modified. 1.3.2.1 Test Mass: The Gross Vehicle Test Mass of the M test vehicle as specified in the ASTM standard is 6,800 kg ± 140 kg. The actual Gross Vehicle Test Mass with instrumentation and ballast was 6681.0 kg. 1.3.3 Impact Conditions ASTM F 2656-07 has specific requirements for impact conditions for a qualifying test which include vehicle impact velocity, approach angle and impact location. 2

1.3.3.1 Velocity: Vehicle velocity at impact with the test article shall be dependent upon the test vehicle mass. For this test, designated M50, the target kinetic energy was 1,680 kj. The calculated target velocity was 80.7 km/h (50.2 mph). Actual velocity at impact was 76.8 km/h (47.7 mph). 1.3.3.2 Approach Angle and Impact Point: The test vehicle was oriented so it approached the test article at a critical impact angle of ninety degrees (90 ± 3 ) relative to the barrier, with the centerline of the vehicle impacting the test article at the impact point designated by the client. The actual impact point must be within ± 300 mm (1 ft.) of the target. The impact point was selected to align the vehicle centerline with the center of one (1) individual bollard. The vehicle s centerline intersected the center of the number 6 bollard. The aligned bollard was immediately to the left of the installation centerline. The actual point of impact was perpendicular within 0.5 and within 51 mm (2.0 in.) of the target. 1.3.4 Test Instrumentation and Data Acquisition Procedures All data acquisition for this test of the RSA K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System was performed in accordance with the ASTM F 2656-07 Standard Test Method requirements. 1.3.4.1 Test Vehicle Instrumentation: The test vehicle was instrumented with two (2) tri-axial accelerometers. One (1) was located along the driver s side frame rail at the longitudinal center of mass and the other at the rear of the same frame rail. The accelerometers measured longitudinal (x), lateral (y), and vertical (z) acceleration. Data was recorded using the on-board TDAS. Data was linked to a personal computer and processed using the TDAS Control software. All equipment used in this test meets the requirements of SAE J211. 1.3.4.2 Calibration: All instrumentation used in this test has been calibrated through standards traceable to NIST and is maintained in a calibrated condition. 1.3.4.3 TDAS Software: The software utilized in this system is written in National Instruments Lab Windows/CVI (C, Visual Interface) programming language, which is a Windows based software package with emphasis on ease of use and good engineering test practices. 1.3.4.4 SAE Compatibility: The software contains standard point and click processing options for selecting Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) class post filters and calculating the required integrals, resultants, Head Injury Criteria (HIC), clips, and other data processing parameters that may be required. 1.3.4.5 Photographic Documentation: Photographic documentation of this test included a minimum of two (2) real-time video cameras at 30 frames per second (fps), and four (4) highspeed color digital video cameras at 1,000 fps. All high-speed cameras were activated by a pressure-sensitive tape switch which was positioned on the test article to indicate the instant of 3

contact (time zero). A digital still camera was used for documenting the pre- and post-test condition of the test article and the test vehicle. 1.3.4.6 Measurement Uncertainty: Measurement uncertainties have been determined for pertinent values affecting the results of this test. KARCO maintains these uncertainty budgets, which are available upon request, but are not included in this report. In certain cases the nature of the test method may preclude rigorous and statistically valid calculation of uncertainty of measurement. In these cases KARCO attempts to identify the components of uncertainty and make a reasonable estimation. Reasonable estimation is based on knowledge of the performance of the method and on the measurement scope and makes use of, for example, previous experience and validation data. 1.4 EVALUATION CRITERION This full scale impact test was performed to evaluate the RSA K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System per the specifications of ASTM F 2656-07. Test articles are evaluated for and given a penetration rating. Table 2 Penetration Ratings Measured Penetration Rating Less than 1 m P1 1.01 m - 7.0 m P2 7.01-30.0 m P3 Greater than 30 m P4 1.4.1 Penetration Rating A penetration rating per ASTM F 2656-07 is given to each test article. The measurements used to formulate this rating are taken from penetration reference points on the test vehicle and the test article. The test vehicle reference points are defined in ASTM F 2656-07 as follows: for small passenger cars the reference point is the center of the base of the A-Pillar; for the remaining three test vehicles (Pickup Truck, Medium Duty Truck, and Heavy Goods Vehicle) the reference point is the lower leading edge of the cargo bed. The penetration reference point on the test article varies depending on the type of test article. Several examples are outlined in Annex A1 of ASTM F 2656-07. For this evaluation of the RSA K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System the test article penetration reference point is the vertical plane created by the back (non-impacted) side of the bollards. 4

Penetration measurements are taken in both static and dynamic modes. The static penetration measurement is based on the vehicle s final resting position and the dynamic penetration is measured from high speed video. The highest value of both static and dynamic penetration for both the left and right sides of the test vehicle is used to assess the penetration rating. Penetration limits are presented in Table 2. For a test article to be given a penetration rating per ASTM F 2656-07, the test article must disable the test vehicle to prevent the vehicle from propelling itself forward. If a test article does not sufficiently disable the vehicle it will be considered unrated. 5

SECTION 2 TEST ARTICLE DETAILS 2.1 TEST ARTICLE The RSA Protective Technologies K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System is a twelve (12) fixed, portable bollard array. The array consists of five (5) types of components: base blocks, bollards, connection plates, type I end blocks and type II end blocks. The as-tested installation consists of four (4) bases, twelve (12) bollards, three (3) connection plates, two (2) type I end blocks and two (2) type II end blocks. The base blocks and type I and II end blocks are filled with sand to ballast the unit. The sand is specified to be a minimum of 1602 kg/m 3 (100 lbs/ft 3 ). The complete installation measures 17.9 m (58.7 ft.) wide from end to end. Each base block is constructed of steel and measures 4.5 m (14.7 ft.) wide and 1.2 m (4.0 ft.) long. The main steel body is 0.3 m (1.0 ft.) tall. The base block has provisions to mount three (3) individual bollards, as well as two (2) additional mounts for the connection plate. The base block has three (3) concrete filled portions, aligned with each of the bollards, and four (4) hollow sections used for ballasting. The bollards are constructed of steel tubes and stiffeners. The main steel tube measures 0.3 m (0.9 ft.) diameter, 25 mm (1.0 in.) wall thickness, and is 1.1 m (3.6 ft.) tall. The stiffener plate is 1.2 m (45.9 in.) long and 25 mm (1.0 in.) thick. Each bollard has two tubes welded laterally internally which allow pins to be placed through the bollard. Each bollard is secured to the base block with a 38 mm (1.5 in.) steel pin. The bollards are concrete filled. The connection plates are used to connect individual base blocks in the array. They are constructed of a steel plate measuring 2.1 m (6.9 ft.) wide by 1.2 m (3.9 ft.) long by 50 mm (2.0 in.) thick. They have four 0.3 m (1.1 ft.) diameter holes which connect to adjacent base blocks. One type I end block is placed behind the installation at each end of the array. The block sits on the road surface directly behind the base end base block. Each type I block measures 1.2 m (4.0 ft.) long, 2.4 m (8.0 ft.) wide, and 1.4 m (4.7 ft.) tall. The block is filled with sand to ballast the installation. The type II end block is used to ballast each end of the array. The type II end block mounts over the last bollard and sits on top of the base block. Each block measures 1.2 m (4.0 ft.) long, 1.2 m (4.0) ft wide, and 1.1 m (3.7 ft.) tall. The block is filled with sand to ballast the installation. The as-tested test article varied from the manufacturer drawings in the following ways: A second set of fill holes was added to the top of each base block. The holes were the same diameter as the rear fill holes and located along the lateral centerline of the block, aligned to the rear fill holes. 6

SECTION 3 TEST RESULTS 3.1 TEST RESULTS As recommended in ASTM F 2656-07 Standard Test Method for Vehicle Crash Testing of Perimeter Barriers the following full-scale impact test was conducted to evaluate the impact performance of the RSA K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System to the M50 test level. Test M50 was conducted on the RSA K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System on January 18, 2012. The test article was positioned at an angle of ninety degrees (90 ) to the direction of travel of the test vehicle, with the vehicle s centerline intersecting the center of the number 6 bollard. The test was conducted using a commercially available 1988 GMC Topkick 7000 medium duty truck with a test inertial mass of 6681.0 kg. Test vehicle information is presented in Data Sheets No. 1 and No. 2. The test vehicle impacted the test article at a velocity of 76.8 km/h (47.7 mph). Evaluation of the test article performance is presented in Data Sheet No. 5. This crash was documented by a minimum of two (2) real-time video cameras and four (4) high-speed digital color video cameras. Photographs of the test vehicle and the K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System are shown in Appendix A. Data plots of the instrumentation are available in Appendix B. The test vehicle s forward motion was completely arrested by the RSA K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System within the 1.0 m penetration limit for a P1 rating. The maximum penetration recorded was 0.906 m on the driver s side, measured dynamically using high speed video analysis. The maximum penetration on the passenger s side was 0.706 m measured dynamically using high speed video analysis. The test vehicle was propelled upward and came to rest on top of the impacted bollard. The entire test installation slid rearward on the concrete pad that it was sitting on; the left end moved 2.0 m (6.7 ft.) rearward; the right end moved 1.0 m (3.4 ft.). The type I end blocks slid rearward approximately 2.6 m (8.5 ft.) on the left and 2.0 m (6.7 ft.) on the right side. The type II end blocks remained on the end base blocks. The test article sustained minor damage on the impacted bollard, base block and connection plate between base blocks 2 and 3. The test vehicle sustained severe damage and was completely disabled by the impact. The vehicle s drivetrain and chassis suffered severe damage, and the front axle separated from the vehicle. 7

SECTION 4 DATA SHEETS Test Article: RSA Protective Technologies K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System Test Program: ASTM F 2656-07 M50 Project No.: P31094-01 Test Vehicle: 1988 GMC Topkick 7000 Test Date: 1/18/12 CONVERSION FACTORS Quantity Typical Application Std Units Metric Unit Multiply By Mass Vehicle Weight lb kg 0.4536 Linear Velocity Impact Velocity miles/hr km/hr 1.609344 Length or Distance Measurements in mm 25.4 Volume Fuel Systems gal liter 3.785 Volume Small Fluids oz ml 29.574 Pressure Tire Pressures lbf/in 2 kpa 6.895 Temperature General Use o F o C =(Tf -32)/1.8 Force Dynamic Forces lbf N 4.448 Moment Torque lbf-ft N m 1.355 8

DATA SHEET 1 TEST VEHICLE INFORMATION Test Article: RSA Protective Technologies K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System Test Program: ASTM F 2656-07 M50 Project No.: P31094-01 Test Vehicle: 1988 GMC Topkick 7000 Test Date: 1/18/12 TEST VEHICLE INFORMATION Make GMC Cylinders V-8 Model Topkick 7000 Engine Displacement (L) Unknown Body Style Medium Duty Truck Engine Placement Longitudinal VIN 1GDM7D1Y6JV502424 Fuel Type Diesel Color White No. of Axles 2 Odometer Reading (mi) 7,028 Disc Brakes, Front No Transmission 5-Speed Automatic Disc Brakes, Rear No Final Drive Rear Anti-Lock Brakes No TIRE INFORMATION Front Tire Size 10R20 Rear Tire Size 10R20 TEST VEHICLE MASS As Received (kg) As Tested (kg) Front Rear Total Front Rear Total Left 1,520.5 1,274.5 2,795.0 1,793.0 1,508.0 3,301.0 Right 1,418.0 1,425.5 2,843.5 1,699.0 1,681.0 3,380.0 Ratio (%) 52.1 47.9 100.0 52.3 47.7 100.0 Total 2,938.5 2,700.0 5,638.5 3,492.0 3,189.0 6,681.0 9

DATA SHEET 2 TEST VEHICLE GEOMETRY Test Article: RSA Protective Technologies K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System Test Program: ASTM F 2656-07 M50 Project No.: P31094-01 Test Vehicle: 1988 GMC Topkick 7000 Test Date: 1/18/12 TEST VEHICLE GEOMETRY No. mm in. No. mm in. No. mm in. A 864 34.0 G 800 31.5 N 1,820 71.7 B 530 20.9 H 1,475 58.1 O 880 34.6 C 805 31.7 I 580 22.8 P 2,500 98.4 D 1,940 76.4 J 1,020 40.2 Q 7,180 282.7 E 2,870 113.0 K 2,440 96.1 F 1,830 72.0 L 2,005 78.9 All measurements in millimeters (mm). Left side measurements reported. 10

DATA SHEET 3 IMPACT CONDITIONS Test Article: RSA Protective Technologies K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System Test Program: ASTM F 2656-07 M50 Project No.: P31094-01 Test Vehicle: 1988 GMC Topkick 7000 Test Date: 1/18/12 IMPACT CONDITIONS Item Value Test Time 9:30 AM Temperature ( F) 55 Wind Velocity (km/h) 0 Wind Direction - Impact Speed (km/h) 76.8 Impact Angle ( ) 89.9 Impact Location (mm) 11 (left) 1 1 1 Impact Angle and impact location measured using high speed video analysis 1 - Information for reference only. 11

DATA SHEET 4 EVALUATION OF TEST RESULTS Test Article: RSA Protective Technologies K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System Test Program: ASTM F 2656-07 M50 Project No.: P31094-01 Test Vehicle: 1988 GMC Topkick 7000 Test Date: 1/18/12 PENETRATION RATINGS Measured Penetration Rating Less than 1 m P1 1.01 m - 7.0 m P2 7.01-30.0 m P3 Greater than 30 m P4 MEASURED PENETRATION Description Units Value Driver's Side Penetration (Dynamic) m 0.91 Passenger's Side Penetration (Dynamic) m 0.71 Maximum Dynamic Penetration m 0.91 Driver's Side Penetration (Static) m 0.87 Passenger's Side Penetration (Static) m 0.70 Maximum Static Penetration m 0.87 Maximum Penetration m 0.91 PENETRATION RATING ASTM F 2656-07 penetration rating for test P31094-01 Comments: P1 The K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System completely arrested the test vehicle within the 1.0 m penetration limit for a P1 rating. The test vehicle was completely disabled by the impact. The drivetrain and chassis were severely damaged, and the front axle separated from the vehicle. 12

DATA SHEET 5 OBSERVATIONS Test Article: RSA Protective Technologies K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System Test Program: ASTM F 2656-07 M50 Project No.: P31094-01 Test Vehicle: 1988 GMC Topkick 7000 Test Date: 1/18/12 TEST ARTICLE COMPONENT MASS Description Mass (kg) Individual Quantity Total 1 Base Block 4,381 4 17,524 Bollard 364 12 4,368 Connection Plate 845 3 2,535 Type 1 End Block 2,197 2 4,394 Type 2 End Block 5,665 2 11,330 Total 40,151 UNPROTECTED SIDE BOLLARD ANGLE MEASUREMENTS Description Angle ( ) Pre-Test Post-Test Difference Bollard 1 Bollard 2 89.3 89.2 0.1 Bollard 3 89.7 89.9-0.2 Bollard 4 89.5 89.0 0.5 Bollard 5 89.9 90.0-0.1 Bollard 6 89.1 88.4 0.7 Bollard 7 89.8 89.5 0.3 Bollard 8 89.7 89.7 0.0 Bollard 9 89.6 89.5 0.1 Bollard 10 89.0 89.3-0.3 Bollard 11 89.4 89.9-0.5 Bollard 12 2 2 1 Total mass for number of components and the total array are estimated based on the measurement of one of each of the different pieces. 2 Bollard 1 and 12 were not measured because they were inside the Type I end blocks. 13

DATA SHEET 5 (CONTINUED) OBSERVATIONS Test Article: RSA Protective Technologies K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System Test Program: ASTM F 2656-07 M50 Project No.: P31094-01 Test Vehicle: 1988 GMC Topkick 7000 Test Date: 1/18/12 RIGHT SIDE BOLLARD ANGLE MEASUREMENTS Description Angle ( ) Pre-Test Post-Test Difference Bollard 1 Bollard 2 89.4 89.7-0.3 Bollard 3 89.6 89.6 0.0 Bollard 4 90.0 89.8 0.2 Bollard 5 89.7 90.0-0.3 Bollard 6 90.0 89.9 0.1 Bollard 7 89.5 89.7-0.2 Bollard 8 89.4 89.3 0.1 Bollard 9 89.6 89.8-0.2 Bollard 10 89.5 89.9-0.4 Bollard 11 89.8 89.8 0.0 Bollard 12 2 2 2 Bollard 1 and 12 were not measured because they were inside the Type I end blocks. 14

DATA SHEET 6 SENSOR DATA Test Article: RSA Protective Technologies K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System Test Program: ASTM F 2656-07 M50 Project No.: P31094-01 Test Vehicle: 1988 GMC Topkick 7000 Test Date: 1/18/12 TEST VEHICLE ACCELERATION PEAK DATA Location Axis Vehicle Max (g) Time (ms) Min (g) Time (ms) CG X 4.7 154.8-26.4 58.0 CG Y 12.4 59.0-26.7 50.4 CG Z 16.5 85.4-14.9 51.6 CG Resultant N/A 31.1 57.8 Rear Frame Member X 5.8 153.4-42.5 77.6 Rear Frame Member Y 16.0 108.2-35.4 76.8 Rear Frame Member Z 17.9 601.4-91.1 77.2 Rear Frame Member Resultant N/A 106.2 77.2 15

APPENDIX A PHOTOGRAPHS A

LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS Figure Page 1 Test Article, As-Received A-1 2 Test Article, As-Received A-1 3 Test Article Installation A-2 4 Test Article Installation A-2 5 Test Article Installation A-3 6 Test Article Installation A-3 7 Test Article Installation A-4 8 Test Article Installation A-4 9 Test Article Installation A-5 10 Test Article Installation A-5 11 Test Article Installation A-6 12 Test Article Installation A-6 13 Test Setup A-7 14 Test Setup Close-Up A-7 15 Test Setup A-8 16 Test Setup Close-Up A-8 17 Test Setup A-9 18 Test Setup Close-Up A-9 19 Test Setup A-10 20 Test Setup Close-Up A-10 21 Test Setup A-11 22 Post-Test A-11 23 Post-Test A-12 24 Post-Test A-12 25 Test Article, Pre-Test Front A-13 26 Test Article, Post-Test Front A-13 27 Test Article, Pre-Test Left Front ¾ A-14 28 Test Article, Post -Test Left Front ¾ A-14 29 Test Article, Pre-Test Left Side A-15 30 Test Article, Post-Test Left Side A-15 31 Test Article, Pre-Test Left Rear ¾ A-16 32 Test Article, Post-Test Left Rear ¾ A-16 A-i

LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS (CONTINUED) Figure Page 33 Test Article, Pre-Test Rear A-17 34 Test Article, Post-Test Rear A-17 35 Test Article, Pre-Test Right Rear ¾ A-18 36 Test Article, Post-Test Right Rear ¾ A-18 37 Test Article, Pre-Test Right Side A-19 38 Test Article, Post-Test Right Side A-19 39 Test Article, Pre-Test Right Front ¾ A-20 40 Test Article, Post-Test Right Front ¾ A-20 41 Test Article, Post-Test Damage A-21 42 Test Article, Post-Test Damage A-21 43 Test Article, Post-Test Damage A-22 44 Test Article, Post-Test Damage A-22 45 Test Article, Post-Test Damage A-23 46 Test Article, Post-Test Damage A-23 47 Test Article, Post-Test Damage A-24 48 Test Article, Post-Test Damage A-24 49 Test Article, Post-Test Damage A-25 50 Test Vehicle, Pre-Test Left Front ¾ A-25 51 Test Vehicle, Post-Test Left Front ¾ A-26 52 Test Vehicle Manufacturer s Label A-26 53 Test Vehicle Manufacturer s Label A-27 A-ii

FIGURE 1. Test Article, As-Received FIGURE 2. Test Article, As-Received A-1

FIGURE 3. Test Article Installation FIGURE 4. Test Article Installation A-2

FIGURE 5. Test Article Installation FIGURE 6. Test Article Installation A-3

FIGURE 7. Test Article Installation FIGURE 8. Test Article Installation A-4

FIGURE 9. Test Article Installation FIGURE 10. Test Article Installation A-5

FIGURE 11. Test Article Installation FIGURE 12. Test Article Installation A-6

FIGURE 13. Test Setup FIGURE 14. Test Setup Close-Up A-7

FIGURE 15. Test Setup FIGURE 16. Test Setup Close-Up A-8

FIGURE 17. Test Setup FIGURE 18. Test Setup Close-Up A-9

FIGURE 19. Test Setup FIGURE 20. Test Setup Close-Up A-10

FIGURE 21. Test Setup FIGURE 22. Post Test A-11

FIGURE 23. Post Test FIGURE 24. Post Test A-12

FIGURE 25. Test Article, Pre-Test Front FIGURE 26. Test Article, Post-Test Front A-13

FIGURE 27. Test Article, Pre-Test Left Front ¾ FIGURE 28. Test Article, Post-Test Left Front ¾ A-14

FIGURE 29. Test Article, Pre-Test Left Side FIGURE 30. Test Article, Post-Test Left Side A-15

FIGURE 31. Test Article, Pre-Test Left Rear ¾ FIGURE 32. Test Article, Post-Test Left Rear ¾ A-16

FIGURE 33. Test Article, Pre-Test Rear FIGURE 34. Test Article, Post-Test Rear A-17

FIGURE 35. Test Article, Pre-Test Right Rear ¾ FIGURE 36. Test Article, Post-Test Right Rear ¾ A-18

FIGURE 37. Test Article, Pre-Test Right Side FIGURE 38. Test Article, Post-Test Right Side A-19

FIGURE 39. Test Article, Pre-Test Right Front ¾ FIGURE 40. Test Article, Post-Test Right Front ¾ A-20

FIGURE 41. Test Article, Post-Test Damage FIGURE 42. Test Article, Post-Test Damage A-21

FIGURE 43. Test Article, Post-Test Damage FIGURE 44. Test Article, Post-Test Damage A-22

FIGURE 45. Test Article, Post-Test Damage FIGURE 46. Test Article, Post-Test Damage A-23

FIGURE 47. Test Article, Post-Test Damage FIGURE 48. Test Article, Post-Test Damage A-24

FIGURE 49. Test Article, Post-Test Damage FIGURE 50. Test Vehicle, Pre-Test Left Front ¾ A-25

FIGURE 51. Test Vehicle, Post-Test Left Front ¾ FIGURE 52. Test Vehicle Manufacturer s Label A-26

FIGURE 53. Test Vehicle Manufacturer s Label A-27

APPENDIX B DATA PLOTS B

LIST OF DATA PLOTS Plot Page 1 Vehicle CG X B-1 2 Vehicle CG Y B-1 3 Vehicle CG Z B-1 4 Vehicle CG Resultant B-1 5 Vehicle CG X Velocity B-2 6 Vehicle CG X Displacement B-2 7 Vehicle Rear Frame Member X B-3 8 Vehicle Rear Frame Member Y B-3 9 Vehicle Rear Frame Member Z B-3 10 Vehicle Rear Frame Member Resultant B-3 11 Vehicle Rear Frame Member X Velocity B-4 12 Vehicle Rear Frame Member X Displacement B-4 B-i

Test Article: Battelle K12 Surface Mount Bollards Systems Project No.: P31094-01 Test Program: ASTM F2656-07 M50 Test Date 1/18/12 Test Vehicle: 1988 GMC Topkick 7000 10 G's 0-10 -20-30 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle CG X CURNO Type SAE Class Units 001 FIL 60 G's Max Time Min Time 5.4 14.6-19.6 28.4 40 G's 20 0-20 -40-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle CG Y CURNO Type SAE Class Units 002 FIL 60 G's Max Time Min Time 27.5 77.4-22.7 96.2 40 G's 20 0-20 -40-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle CG Z CURNO Type SAE Class Units 003 FIL 60 G's Max Time Min Time 27.2 74.8-19.6 24.8 60 G's 40 20 0-20 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle CG Resultant CURNO Type SAE Class Units 001 RES 60 G's Max Time Min Time 57.4 75.0 0.0-40.0 B-1

Test Article: Battelle K12 Surface Mount Bollards Systems Project No.: P31094-01 Test Program: ASTM F2656-07 M50 Test Date 1/18/12 Test Vehicle: 1988 GMC Topkick 7000 60 MPH 45 30 15 0-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle CG X Velocity CURNO Type SAE Class Units 001 IN1 180 MPH Max Time Min Time 47.6-18.0 2.9 342.6 150 Inches 100 50 0-50 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle CG X Displacement CURNO Type SAE Class Units 001 IN1 180 Inches Max Time Min Time 113.0 499.8-33.5-40.0 B-2

Test Article: Battelle K12 Surface Mount Bollards Systems Project No.: P31094-01 Test Program: ASTM F2656-07 M50 Test Date 1/18/12 Test Vehicle: 1988 GMC Topkick 7000 10 G's 0-10 -20-30 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle Rear Frame Member X CURNO Type SAE Class Units 004 FIL 60 G's Max Time Min Time 7.4 15.0-20.5 29.4 10 G's 5 0-5 -10-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle Rear Frame Member Y CURNO Type SAE Class Units 005 FIL 60 G's Max Time Min Time 7.5 164.0-6.5 121.8 40 G's 20 0-20 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle Rear Frame Member Z CURNO Type SAE Class Units 006 FIL 60 G's Max Time Min Time 30.5 58.4-15.1 40.8 60 G's 40 20 0-20 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle Rear Frame Member Resultant CURNO Type SAE Class Units 004 RES 60 G's Max Time Min Time 52.2 25.4 0.1 301.2 B-3

Test Article: Battelle K12 Surface Mount Bollards Systems Project No.: P31094-01 Test Program: ASTM F2656-07 M50 Test Date 1/18/12 Test Vehicle: 1988 GMC Topkick 7000 60 MPH 40 20 0-20 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle Rear Frame Member X Velocity CURNO Type SAE Class Units 004 IN1 180 MPH Max Time Min Time 47.6-40.0 6.2 321.0 150 Inches 100 50 0-50 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 Time - Milliseconds Curve Description Vehicle Rear Frame Member X Displacement CURNO Type SAE Class Units 004 IN1 180 Inches Max Time Min Time 133.3 499.8-33.5-40.0 B-4

APPENDIX C DATA ACQUISITION INFORMATION C

DATA ACQUISITION INFORMATION Test Article: RSA Protective Technologies K12 Surface Mounted Bollard System Test Program: ASTM F 2656-07 M50 Project No.: P31094-01 Test Vehicle: 1988 GMC Topkick 7000 Test Date: 1/18/12 VEHICLE INSTRUMENTATION INFORMATION CH Location Axis Ident. No. Description MFR Model Units 1 Vehicle CG X KETX11A Accel, Triax I.C. Sensor 3031-500 g 2 Vehicle CG Y KETX11B Accel, Triax I.C. Sensor 3031-500 g 3 Vehicle CG Z KETX11C Accel, Triax I.C. Sensor 3031-500 g 4 Vehicle Rear Frame X KETX12A Accel, Triax 5 Vehicle Rear Frame Y KETX12B Accel, Triax 6 Vehicle Rear Frame Z KETX12C Accel, Triax Measurement Specialties Measurement Specialties Measurement Specialties 3038-500 g 3038-500 g 3038-500 g HIGH SPEED CAMERA INFORMATION View No. Location Identification No. Manufacturer Type 1 Driver's Side Profile View 7959 Phantom V9 2 Inline View 2706 Phantom V5 3 Overhead View 2891 Phantom V5.1 4 Driver's Side Oblique View 2576 Phantom V5 C-1

APPENDIX D DRAWINGS AND ILLUSTRATIONS D

LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 54 Manufacturer s Drawing D-1 55 Manufacturer s Drawing D-2 56 Manufacturer s Drawing D-3 57 Manufacturer s Drawing D-4 58 Manufacturer s Drawing D-5 59 Overhead Illustration D-6 D-i

Figure 54: Manufacturer s Drawing D-1

Figure 55: Manufacturer s Drawing D-2

Figure 59: Overhead Illustration FINAL PAGE OF REPORT D-6