US Gulf Coast HSFO. Recommended differential to reflect benchmark assessment specification change from January 2017

Similar documents
Americas Heavy Distillates

The Changing composition of bunker fuels: Implications for refiners, traders, and shipping

METHODOLOGY AND SPECIFICATIONS GUIDE OIL TIMING AND INCREMENT GUIDELINES

Regional Petroleum Fuel and Gas Price Review October 2014

Products Methodology. September 2013

TRANSPACIFIC CUSTOMER ADVISORY Implementation of New BAF Formula Effective January 01, 2019

B A K E R & O B R I E N

Bunkering With New Fuels Building on Strong Foundations.

Refining impact of the IMO bunker fuel sulphur decision

Residual Fuel Market Issues

Fuel Oil Sulfur Spreads Set to Widen Through 2020 Regulations upend bunker fuel market.

Trends for Refining Residual Fuel Oil. Prepared for Bunker Asia Forum 2011 Singapore 7 September 2011

Methodology and specifications guide China Oil Analytics

The Transition to Low Sulfur Bunker Fuel

Desulphurizing Marine Fuel/HFO Utilizing IUT Technology. November 19, 2017 International Ultrasonic Technologies Inc.

New York Energy Forum IMO2020 Market Issues

REFORMATE Crude Condensate Naphtha Ethane Reformate

Market Report Series: Oil 2018 Analysis & Forecasts to Energy Community 10 th Oil Forum, Belgrade, 25 September 2018

Measuring the Quality of the Crude Oil Supply and its Impact on Basis Differentials

New Regulatory Environment

CIRCULAR 14/ May Circular 14/030 dated 29 April 2014, announced: Category:

GUIDANCE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SHIP IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE CONSISTENT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 0.50% SULPHUR LIMIT UNDER MARPOL ANNEX VI

SPC S PETROLEUM ADVISORY SERVICES. Pacific Energy Advisory Group meeting Pritanshu Singh th December

Outlook for Marine Bunkers and Fuel Oil to 2025 Sourcing Lower Sulphur Products

The evolution of Platts Asia gasoil assessments towards cleaner fuel standards

Geneva International L L C

Desulphurizing Bunker Fuel/HFO Utilizing IUT Technology

Outlook for Marine Bunkers and Fuel Oil to A key to understanding the future of marine bunkers and fuel oil markets

Special Executive Report

Rim price assessments indicate the current range in which a standard spot transaction could take place on the day of publication.

Pacific Fuel Price Monitor

Fuel oil ICIS quotes Fuel oil in Asia and China as follows: Region Assessment name Type Freq Units Also Pubs Code

AUTORIDAD MARÍTIMA DE PANAMÁ

Marine Fuel Management. Mark Pearson ASGL Marine Fuel Manager Athens, 9 April 2014

Asia Heavy Distillates

NORTH AMERICAN ECA AND NEW FUEL SULFUR CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

Squaring up IMO 2020 Global Sulphur Cap Maintaining a Fleet at Optimal Efficiency

MARPOL Annex VI Emission Control Areas. CDR Ryan Allain U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Standards Division Washington, D.C.

Index 1. ISO 8217 :

ISO 8217:2010 Dr.r.Vis, Viswa Lab

WEEKLY REFINING INDICATORS REPORT WEEK ENDING 06/17/2016

The road leading to the 0.50% sulphur limit and IMO s role moving forward

Indicative Gas Transportation Charges from 1 April 2012 for East of England, London, North West and West Midlands Distribution Networks

A New Proxy for Coking Margins Forget the Crack Spread

2020: Outcome of MEPC 73

Market Disruptor: IMO 2020

Notice of proposed amendment to Service Charges for Regulatory Year ending 31 March 2019

25 th May 2018 Prague. MSAR Technology - Emulsion Fuel for Power Generation, Marine Bunkers & Refinery Uses

IMO 2020: A Sea Change is Coming

Strategic Factors Impacting The California Crude Oil Market. About Purvin & Gertz, Inc. California Independent Petroleum Association

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

Performing In A Volatile Oil Market

Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG)

Ceiba Crude (31.44 API, Sul WT%)

Light-Heavy Crude Oil Outlook: Implications for Coker Margins

ANNEX 7. RESOLUTION MEPC.182(59) Adopted on 17 July 2009

Royal Belgian Institute of Marine Engineers

Global LPG Shipping and Pricing Trending Topics. November

Specifications Of Straight Run Naphtha for Exportation

Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG)

Trade Logistics and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION

Compliance with IMO Regulations - New Strategies for Refiners in the U.S. and Internationally

GLOBAL SEAWAYS GROUP OF COMPANIES CHRISTMAS PARTY

California Low Carbon Fuel Standard Status Report. John D. Courtis October 17, 2011

CHEMSYSTEMS. Report Abstract. Petrochemical Market Dynamics Feedstocks

Spot D $/TONNE. Asia. Asia

CHEVRON PIPE LINE COMPANY

Maritime policies and regulations IMO s work for sustainable shipping. Green Marine - Greentech May to 1 June 2017

Operating Refineries in a High Cost Environment. Options for RFS Compliance. March 20, Baker & O Brien, Inc. All rights reserved.

The Continuing Journey to 2020 and the 0.5% Sulphur Limit For Marine Fuel

Commuter Rail Performance. October

COMPILED BY GLASS S. Auction Report October 2014

POLLUTION PREVENTION AND RESPONSE (MATTERS EMANATING FROM THE FIFTH SESSION OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE)

Week ending 5 August Sunday, 5 August 2018.

Changes in Bunker Fuel Quality Impact on European and Russian Refiners

Bunker Fuel Quality: 2020 Outlook North of England P&I Athens, November

Efficient Risk Assessment for ships using Low Flash Point Fuel

D ISB Lubricant Performance Test. Report Packet Version No. Method. Conducted For:

THE CONUNDRUM OF NEW COMPLEX REFINING INVESTMENTS

What Do the Impending New Bunker Specs Mean for Refiners

Implications Across the Supply Chain. Prepared for Sustainableshipping Conference San Francisco 30 September 2009

Assessment of Fuel Oil Availability. Jasper Faber, The Hague, 3 October 2016

US Pages for Refined Product Project

DP-5 Machine Operation and Controls:

Effects of MARPOL VI on Petcoke, Distillates, Resids, Vacuum Tower Bottoms and the Light-Heavy Spread

Stronger than the others

AN ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION SULPHUR REGULATIONS

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has

Russian Petroleum Products (Limited Soft Offer) (Valid For 5 Days from the Day of Reception)

B A K E R & O B R I E N

Oil Markets Review. Jorge Montepeque, August 20, Platts, McGraw Hill Financial. All rights reserved.

Growing U.S. Light Crude Exports and IMO 2020 Driven Discounts: Who Benefits?

GUIDELINES FOR USE OF LOW SULPHUR FUEL OILS IN SHIPS

Week ending 13 January Sunday, 13 January 2019.

2020 SULPHUR CAP INTRODUCING MSC S BUNKER CHARGE MECHANISM FOR December 2018

Changing Crude Qualities and Their Impacts on U.S. Refinery Operations AM-14-42

Week ending 6 January Sunday, 6 January 2019.

Phillips Texas Pipeline Company, LTD. Amarillo-Lubbock Pipeline (SAAL) Product Specifications

D 5966 Roller Follower Wear Test. Final Report Cover Sheet. Report Packet Version No. Conducted For:

Transcription:

US Gulf Coast HSFO Recommended differential to reflect benchmark assessment specification change from January 2017 2015 Platts, McGraw Hill Financial. All rights reserved.

Platts subscriber note on USGC HSFO SUBSCRIBER NOTE: Platts to rename, update USGC 3%S fuel benchmark from Jan 2017 Houston (Platts)--6Oct2015/1236 pm EDT/1636 GMT Following a review and formal proposal, Platts will update the specifications reflected in its benchmark US Gulf Coast 3%S physical residual fuel oil assessment to reflect RMG 380 3.5%S quality fuel oil, as per ISO 8217 specifications, with effect from January 3, 2017. At the same time, Platts will rename the assessment as "USGC HSFO" and standardize its name across all publications. The name change will also take effect January 3, 2017. These changes follow a review of the existing specifications announced May 27, 2015, and a formal proposal announced July 14, 2015. This assessment will continue to be published under the product code PUAFZ00. SPECIFICATION UPDATE: Once implemented, the USGC HSFO assessment will reflect residual fuel oil intended for end-use by the bunker sector to meet maritime fuel demands. The specifications include the following parameters: Sulfur max 3.5% Gravity Min 11.2 API Viscosity max 380 CST at 50 C Vanadium max 300 ppm Al+Si max 80 ppm Flash point min 60 C Pour point max 30 C Water max 0.5% Ash max 0.1% NAME UPDATE: Platts will rename this assessment "USGC HSFO" and standardize the name of the assessment across all publications. This assessment is currently published in the Platts price database under the data code PUAFZ00, in Platts US Marketscan as "No. 6 3%" in its "Gulf Coast" table, in Oilgram Price Report as "Gulf Coast No. 6 3.0%S (Waterborne) Fuel Oil," in Latin American Wire as "Fuel Oil 3%S," and in North American Crude and Products Scan as "Resid 3%." TIMING UPDATE: The January 2017 implementation date is the result of extensive feedback, and marks a delay of three months from the original proposal date of October 2016. For questions or comments, please email americas_products@platts.com and pricegroup@platts.com. Please provide a clear indication if comments are not intended for publication by Platts for public viewing. Platts will consider all comments received and will make comments not marked as confidential available upon request. 2

Platts subscriber note on recommended differential SUBSCRIBER NOTE: Platts recommends USGC HSFO differential of $1.45/b Houston (Platts)--6Oct2015/1238 pm EDT/1638 GMT Platts recommends a one-time differential of $1.45/b that may be used in amending US Gulf Coast 3%S fuel oil derivatives and other contracts that will settle against Platts' physical 3%S fuel oil benchmark assessment from January 2017 onwards. The recommendation follows a decision announced October 6, 2015, by Platts to update the specification of its US Gulf Coast 3%S fuel oil assessment with effect from January 3, 2017. The differential is based on an extensive analysis of the difference between the existing US Gulf Coast 3%S fuel oil (PUAFZ00) and FO RMG 380 USGC Waterborne (Platts code PUBDM00) assessments from 2010 to 2015. For questions or comments, please email americas_products@platts.com and pricegroup@platts.com. Please provide a clear indication if comments are not intended for publication by Platts for public viewing. Platts will consider all comments received and will make comments not marked as confidential available upon request. 3

No. 6 3.0% - RMG 380 USGC HSFO

No. 6 3.0% - RMG 380 USGC HSFO Sep 2010 Sep 2015 No 6. 3.0% Average = $84.61/barrel RMG 380 Average = $86.07/barrel Differential Average = -$1.46/barrel Sep 2012 Sep 2015 No 6. 3.0% Average = $77.94/barrel RMG 380 Average = $79.37/barrel Differential Average = -$1.43/barrel Sep 2014 Sep 2015 No 6. 3.0% Average = $49.79/barrel RMG 380 Average = $51.26/barrel Differential Average = -$1.47/barrel SUGGESTED DIFFERENTIAL -$1.45/barrel Balances out one-year and three-year average and is close to five-year average In the month of Sep 2014, average = -$2/barrel In the month of Sep 2015 to date, average = -$1.35/barrel

Appendix Singapore gasoil precedent PLATTS RECOMMENDS SINGAPORE GASOIL DIFFERENTIAL AT $1.70/BARREL London (Platts)--15May2012/445 am EDT/845 GMT After broad consultation and reviewing extensive feedback from the industry and other interested parties, Platts recommends a one-time differential of $1.70/barrel that may be used in amending gasoil derivatives and other contracts that will settle against Platts' Singapore Gasoil benchmark assessment from January 2013 onwards. The differential is based on an analysis of the difference between FOB Singapore Gasoil 500 ppm sulfur and FOB Singapore Gasoil 0.5% (5,000 ppm) sulfur during 2011 and early 2012. Platts announced in July 2011 that its Singapore "0.5%S Gasoil" assessment would be renamed Singapore "Gasoil" on January 3, 2012, and stated that Platts intended to steadily reduce the amount of sulfur reflected in the benchmark assessment over time. Platts announced in November 2011 that it would lower the sulfur specification of the flagship Singapore Gasoil assessment to 500 ppm from the current 5,000 ppm on January 2, 2013. The assessment appears on real-time service Platts Global Alert PGA 6, in APAGScan and in Oilgram Price Report. 6