Corridor Sketch Summary

Similar documents
EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

June WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Program Seattle, Washington

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

Purpose and Need Report

Chapter 7: Corridor Visions

Brigham City 1200 West Box Elder Creek Bridge - Widening Project Type Reconstruction

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

APPENDIX H. Transportation Impact Study

Current Corridor Characteristics. MN 62 Corridor Performance

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

IH 35 FEASIBILITY STUDY

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017

New Jersey Turnpike Authority Interchange 6 to 9 Widening Program

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

Introduction and Background Study Purpose

Public Information Packet FY Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

I-394 Corridor Performance

The State of SCDOT. Presented: February 1, 2017 Secretary Christy A. Hall, P.E.

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

US 70 Corridor Planning for the Future

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY VICDOM BROCK ROAD PIT EXPANSION

US 10 Corridor Performance

Median Barriers in North Carolina -- Long Term Evaluation. Safety Evaluation Group Traffic Safety Systems Management Section

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

Dixie Transportation Planning Office

This corridor section will carry commuter trains from Portland to Longview/Kelso, CHSR inter-city and inter-city express trains.

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

2016 Congestion Report

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Rocky Mount. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

Note: The October 2007 version of this report has been updated in this December 2008 report to present costs in year 2007 dollars.

Maryland Gets to Work

Population Trends. US 12 Corridor Performance

Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan

November 1, Mr. Jafar Tabrizi President, Tabrizi Rugs 180 Bedford Highway. Traffic Impact Statement BH-1 and BH-2, Southgate Drive, Bedford, NS

Citizens Committee for Facilities

Kentucky Highway District 6

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Over-Dimensional Vehicle Restriction Study for US 129 in TN

American Center for Mobility

Conventional Approach

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

TOLL TRUCKWAYS: Increasing Productivity and Safety in Goods Movement. By Robert W. Poole, Jr., and Peter Samuel

Goods Movement Plans. Summary of Needs Assessments. January 21, 2015 GOODS MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE AND GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN 6

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

I-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

The Jack A. Markell Trail Delaware s Bicycle Highway New England Bike- Walk Summit

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

Mountainland Association of Governments SPRINGVILLE-SPANISH FORK AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY APRIL 2012

RECOMMENDATIONS. 7-1 Anchorage Metropolitan Area Transportation Solutions

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Technical Feasibility Report

2016 North Trunk Highway 65 Corridor Coalition Manufacturers Survey

Vantage to Pomona Heights Transmission Project Frequently asked questions

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Candidate Project List for Public Review

Engineering Report: Shasta-Trinity National Forest. South Fork Management Unit. Analysis of. National Forest System Road 30N44

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming

DIXIE TIP CONCEPT REPORT APPLICATION FY 2015 (Due November 6, 2013) PROJECT INFORMATION

North Whitfield County Roadway Corridor Study

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

CITY OF POWAY MEMORANDUM

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 INTRODUCTION...3 PROJECTED FUTURE GROWTH...3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...4 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES...

Request for Design Exception (#1) S.M. Wright Phase IIB

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

The Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future

SC Highway 41 Existing Conditions

5.9 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Attachment F Transportation Technical Memorandum

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

Tulsa Transportation Management Area. Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program

Keeping Seattle Moving Seattle City Council February 2013

Transportation Technical Report

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

Station Evaluation. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project Spring 2012

FRESNO COUNTY SUBSECTION OF THE CALIFORNIA HIGH- SPEED TRAIN (HST)

POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION. Effective Date: July 10, 2013

Public Meeting. SD Highway 28 From US81 W 11 miles through Lake Norden Hamlin County PH 0028(37)329 PCN 04JY

SH 249 IN GRIMES COUNTY. Open House April 3, 2014

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

Transcription:

Corridor Sketch Summary SR 241: I-82 Jct (Sunnyside) to SR 24 Jct Corridor Highway No. 241 Mileposts: 7.53 to 25.21 Length: 17.65 miles Corridor Description The seventeen and one-half mile corridor begins at the I-82 bridge in the City of Sunnyside and extends to the SR 24 junction. The corridor begins on the east side of the City of Sunnyside with a mix of urban development and irrigated farmland adjacent to the highway. The topography here is generally flat. SR 241 continues pass the existing city limits and urban growth area boundary at Sheller Rd (mp 9.30) and begins gradually ascending the base of the Rattlesnake Hills. High-value irrigated farmland continues for another 4 miles before abruptly changing to open range land, grass and scrub vegetation. The grade increases with an open slope on either side of the highway. 426 SR 241 reaches the crest of the Rattlesnake Hills around mp 20 (elevation 2,100 feet, approximately). The grass, sage, and scrub vegetation continues as SR 241 descends down the north slope of the Rattlesnake Hills, but changes to hillier terrain. The slope becomes gentler before reaching the junction of SR 24, where the corridor ends. Page 1 of 5

Corridor Function Current Function Comments or feedback on function The corridor connects I-82 to SR 24. It is the only public road through the Rattlesnake Hills between SR 225 and Konnowac Pass Rd, a distance of about 45 miles. SR 241 also connects the Yakima Valley to the SR 24 Vernita Bridge over the Columbia River and into the Columbia Basin. Traffic volumes range from 1,500 to 5,000 vehicles per day. (There is a localized peak of 14,000 vpd in the immediate vicinity of the I-82 Interchange). SR 241 is classified as a T-3 on the Freight and Goods Transportation System hauling about 2 million tons per year and averaging 350 trucks per day. The only exception is a short one-third mile segment between I-82 and Yakima Valley Hwy that is a T-2 classification hauling over 6 million tons per year and averaging 1,200 trucks per day. SR 241 is an Urban Minor Arterial highway in Sunnyside with medium speed limits ranging from 40 to 45 miles per hour. In the rural area, SR 241 becomes a Rural Collector high-speed facility with speed limits from 50 to 55 mph. Future Function It is expected that SR 241 will continue its important functions connecting I-82 and SR 22 to SR 24, and also the Yakima Valley to the Columbia Basin via the SR 24 Vernita Bridge over the Columbia River. It is likely to remain the only public road through the Rattlesnake Hills between SR 225 and Konnowac Pass Rd. The freight tonnage and volumes could increase some; the traffic may increase modestly. In the immediate vicinity of Sunnyside, there could be a significant increase in traffic as the City develops to the east. Development will be attracted to easy access to the interstate via SR 241. Preservation Policy Goal: To maintain, preserve, and extend the life and utility of prior investments in transportation system and services. Less than one-half of one percent of the pavement is past due for resurfacing and 97% is not due until into the future. Comments or feedback on preservation Safety Policy Goal: To provide for and improve the safety and security of transportation customers and the transportation system. Page 2 of 5

history of failure to stop crashes. Sight distance may also be an issue at Edison Rd. There are a large number of injuries even though traffic volumes are relatively low (3,860 vehicles per day). The SR 241/Yakima Valley Highway intersection is a non-typical signalized intersection in the northbound direction. The highway curves and crosses shortline railroad tracks approximately 100 feet from Yakima Valley Hwy. There were 4 fatalities and 6 severe injuries between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2015 (5 years) with fairly low traffic volumes between 5,000 and 1,400 ADT. Many sections of SR 241 have narrow or non-existent paved shoulders plus some parts have only 10-foot lanes as well. Van Belle Rd and Independence Rd are major east-west connectors for Yakima County. Long term, the County sees the need for future intersection improvements where they intersect SR 241. In addition, to Edison Rd and Factory Rd, Sheller Rd may also need safety improvements. The unirrigated land section is vulnerable to wildfires. Comments or feedback on safety Mobility Policy Goal: To improve the predictable movement of goods and people through Washington State, including congestion relief and improved freight mobility. WSDOT currently defines congestion for system screening as locations that currently or are projected to operate below 70% of the posted speed limit during peak hour. Statewide analysis is preformed to screen at three time periods: current year, ten year and twenty year. The traffic volumes outside the City of Sunnyside are low (between 1,500 to 3,400 vehicles per day). This rural segment of SR 241 has adequate capacity now and should have so into the foreseeable future. SR 241 does not have any sidewalks or pedestrian facilities connecting the I-82 interchange area to the Lower Yakima Valley Pathway adjacent to the Yakima Valley Hwy. Three restaurants, two motels, and a cinema complex are located on the north side of I-82 and would attract or generate pedestrian traffic. The Sunnyside area has a need for an official park-and-ride particularly for commuters to Hanford. A logical location would be along SR 241 as it on the way to Hanford. In recent years, a former park-and-ride was eliminated when the property owner no longer wished to remain in the program. The existing transit service in the urban area is not adequate. The City of Sunnyside has a need for improved circulation within the city especially in certain areas where there is transit demand. While outside of the state highway system, the City has eliminated all the four lane roads in the City. Backups of 10 to 15 vehicles are common with backups of 30 vehicles occurring. Commercial development in the SR 241/Allen Rd intersection vicinity will increase and is expected to reach full Page 3 of 5

buildout. A hospital is planned just southwest of I-82 Exit 69 (SR 241/Waneta Rd). If it is developed, this will spur growth even more. Future improvements to the SR 241/Allen Rd intersection and the I-82 ramp terminals will be needed. There is a fair amount of travel back-and-forth between Sunnyside and Grandview, and Grandview has an existing bus system. There may be a possibility of an integrated Sunnyside-Grandview bus system in the future. The unirrigated land section is vulnerable to wildfires, which causes the highway to be closed. Alternative routes require considerable out-of-direction travel. Comments or feedback on mobility Environment Policy Goal: To enhance Washington's quality of life through transportation investments that promote energy conservation, enhance healthy communities, and protect the environment. The fish passage at mp 9.17 has been corrected so fish can pass unimpeded. Twelve miles of SR 241, all north of Sunnyside, are a low priority for habitat connectivity investment. The fish passage at mp 8.80 (E Edison Rd) is completely blocked. One mile of SR 241 (mp 21.5 to 22.5), on the north side of Rattlesnake Hills, is a medium priority for habitat connectivity investment. All, except for the first mile of the corridor, is identified as having moderate climate impact vulnerability. The first mile is identified as a low vulnerability. Comments or feedback on environment Economic Vitality Policy Goal: To promote and develop transportation systems that stimulate, support and enhance the movement of people and goods to ensure a prosperous economy. The excess rural capacity provides opportunities for any businesses that would like to utilize the corridor. SR 241 does not have any sidewalks or pedestrian facilities connecting the I-82 interchange area to the Lower Yakima Valley Pathway adjacent to the Yakima Valley Hwy. Three restaurants, two motels, and a cinema complex are located on the north side of I-82 and would attract or generate pedestrian traffic. Page 4 of 5

Comments or feedback on economic vitality Corridor 426 Page 5 of 5