Linear Algebraic Modeling of Power Flow in the HMPT500-3 Transmission

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Track & Suspension Overview Mr. Jason Alef & Mr. Geoff Bossio 11 Aug 2011

2011 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 9-11 DEARBORN, MICHIGAN

TARDEC Technology Integration

Robot Drive Motor Characterization Test Plan

High efficiency variable speed versatile power air conditioning system for military vehicles

TARDEC Robotics. Dr. Greg Hudas UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Energy Storage Overview Mr. David Skalny & Dr. Laurence Toomey 10 August 2011

EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Non-primary Power Systems Overview Kevin Centeck and Darin Kowalski 10 Aug 2011

Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Command (TARDEC) Overview

TARDEC --- TECHNICAL REPORT ---

INTELLIGENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN A TWO POWER-BUS VEHICLE SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

GM-TARDEC Autonomous Safety Collaboration Meeting

Alternative Fuels: FT SPK and HRJ for Military Use

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 3

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A. Approved for Public Release TACOM Case # 21906, 26 May Vehicle Electronics and Architecture

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4

TARDEC OVERVIEW. Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center. APTAC Spring Conference Detroit 27 March, 2007

Evaluation of Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL) Candidates for Fuel Consumption Benefits in Military Equipment

DSCC Annual Tire Conference CATL UPDATE. March 24, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

An Advanced Fuel Filter

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

Servicing Hawker Vehicle Batteries with Standard Battery Charging and Test Equipment

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

Up-Coming Diesel Fuel and Exhaust Emissions Regulations For Mobile Sources. Parminder Khabra RDECOM-TARDEC TACOM LCMC March 22, 2006 JSEM

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

EXPLORATORY DISCUSSIONS - PRE DECISIONAL

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

Energy Storage Requirements & Challenges For Ground Vehicles

Feeding the Fleet. GreenGov Washington D.C. October 31, 2011

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

TARDEC Hybrid Electric Program Last Decade

AFRL-RX-TY-TM

UNCLASSIFIED: DIST A. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. ARMY GREATEST INVENTIONS CY 2009 PROGRAM MRAP Overhead Wire Mitigation (OWM) Kit

Robust Fault Diagnosis in Electric Drives Using Machine Learning

INLINE MONITORING OF FREE WATER AND PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION OF JET A FUEL

FTTS Utility Vehicle UV2 Concept Review FTTS UV2 Support Variant

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Power Requirements

Monolithically Integrated Micro Flapping Vehicles

Helicopter Dynamic Components Project. Presented at: HCAT Meeting January 2006

U.S. Army/CERDEC's Portable Fuel Cell Evaluation and Field Testing 2011 Fuel Cell Seminar & Expo Orlando, FL 31 Oct 2011

Presented by Mr. Greg Kilchenstein OSD, Maintenance. 29August 2012

Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System. Auto-ACAS. Mark A. Skoog Dryden Flight Research Center - NASA. AutoACAS. Dryden Flight Research Center

Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination

HIGH REPETITION RATE CHARGING A MARX TYPE GENERATOR *

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Does V50 Depend on Armor Mass?

Dual Use Ground Vehicle Condition-Based Maintenance Project B

US ARMY POWER OVERVIEW

LESSONS LEARNED WHILE MEASURING FUEL SYSTEM DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MARK HEATON AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 10 MAY 2011

Open & Evolutive UAV Architecture

Multilevel Vehicle Design: Fuel Economy, Mobility and Safety Considerations, Part B

IMPACT OF FRICTION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON FUEL ECONOMY FOR GROUND VEHICLES G. R. Fenske, R. A. Erck, O. O. Ajayi, A. Masoner, and A. S.

ANALYSIS OF NON-TACTICAL VEHICLE UTILIZATION AT FORT CARSON COLORADO

US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations. Major Robert Kent, USAF, MC, SFS

Program Overview. Chris Mocnik Robotic Vehicle Control Architecture for FCS ATO Manager U.S. Army RDECOM TARDEC

DESULFURIZATION OF LOGISTIC FUELS FOR FUEL CELL APUs

Fuel Efficient ground vehicle Demonstrator (FED) Vision

Navy Coalescence Test on Camelina HRJ5 Fuel

Navy Coalescence Test on Petroleum F-76 Fuel with Infineum R655 Lubricity Improver at 300 ppm

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel January 25, 2006 Hilton San Diego Resort 1775 East Mission Bay Drive San Diego, CA 92109

Application of Airbag Technology for Vehicle Protection

Center for Ground Vehicle Development and Integration

TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS ON A FUSELAGE-LIKE TEST SETUP AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF APERTURES

Predator B: The Multi-Role UAV

DEVELOPMENT OF COMPACT VARIABLE- VOLTAGE, BI-DIRECTIONAL 100KW DC-DC CONVERTER

Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

Hydro-Piezoelectricity: A Renewable Energy Source For Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

GVSET Power & Energy Preview Mr. Chuck Coutteau Associate Director (Acting) Ground Vehicle Power & Mobility 19 August 2009

2012 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 14-16, MICHIGAN

Evaluation of Digital Refractometers for Field Determination of FSII Concentration in JP-5 Fuel

Developing a Methodology for the Evaluation of Hybrid Vehicle Thermal Management Systems

F100 ENGINE NACELLE FIRE FIGHTING TEST MOCKUP DRAWINGS

Power Technology Branch Army Power Division US Army RDECOM CERDEC C2D Fort Belvoir, Virginia

A GENERAL PURPOSE VEHICLE POWERTRAIN MODELING AND SIMULATION SOFTWARE - VPSET

EFFICIENT PTO DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

Hybrid Components: Motors and Power Electronics

Membrane Wing Aerodynamics for µav Applications

Additives to Increase Fuel Heat Sink Capacity

Predator Program Office

Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft

Portable Fluid Analyzer

SUSPENSION PARAMETER MEASUREMENTS OF WHEELED MILITARY VEHICLES

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards VHG Labs Inc. Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100 and D12-XXX Series Standards

ITC-Germany Visit. Chuck Coutteau, Associate Director Ground Vehicle Power and Mobility Overview 10 November 2011

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Presented by: Dr. Richard Gerth U.S. Army National Automotive Center (NAC) Tank Automotive Research Development and Engineering Center

NDCEE National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

THE CHALLENGES OF COMPARING PROPULSION COOLING CFD STUDIES TO TEST CHAMBER AND ON-ROAD PERFORMANCE

Research Development and Engineering Command TARDEC/NAC

Tank-Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center

Battery Research & Development Need for Military Vehicle Application

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards SCP Science (Conostan) Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100, and D12-XXX Series Standards

Crew integration & Automation Testbed and Robotic Follower Programs

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Transcription:

2012 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM MODELING & SIMULATION, TESTING AND VALIDATION (MSTV) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 14-16, MICHIGAN Matthew G McGough US Army RDECOM-TARDEC, CASSI-Analytics Warren, MI ABSTRACT The HMPT500-3 is a split torque path hydrostatic / mechanical continuously variable transmission used in the Bradley Fighting Vehicle. Power transmission and steering is accomplished through the interaction of six planetary gear sets and two variable displacement hydrostatic pump / motor units (HSUs). Power flow in the HMPT500-3 is extremely complex, with numerous feedback paths within the planetary gear train. Without a clearly defined power flow path from gear set to gear set, the analysis cannot be handled in the conventional stepwise manner. The complete speed and torque equation sets must be solved simultaneously for all components. A linear algebraic approach was developed to model forward operation of the HMPT500-3 without steering. The left and right HSUs are lumped in a single unit, and the steering differential is ignored. A reduced set of 14 simultaneous equations for speed and 14 simultaneous equations for torque enable modeling of the ideal (lossless) power flow in the transmission for all forward ranges. Transmission losses are then estimated based on the speed and torque for each individual component, allowing the transmission overall efficiency to be calculated. INTRODUCTION The HMPT500-3 is a split torque path hydrostatic / mechanical continuously variable tracked vehicle transmission. Power transmission and steering is accomplished through the interaction of six planetary gear sets and two variable displacement hydrostatic pump / motor units (HSUs), connected through intermediate shafts and gears. The desired transmission speed ratio is achieved by first selecting a discrete mechanical range with clutches and brakes and then varying the HSU displacement to either add or subtract speed from the outputs in a continuous manner. The left and right HSU displacements are varied identically to control vehicle forward speed and differentially to provide steering. Except in reverse, only part of the HSU displacement capacity is used for vehicle speed control, with the remainder reserved for steering. A simplified schematic for the transmission is shown in fig. 1. The HMPT500-3 is currently used in the Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV) family and Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS). It is also proposed for use in the Paladin Integrated Management (PIM) self-propelled howitzer and BFV derived Armored Multipurpose Vehicle (AMPV). Weight growth of these vehicles is exceeding the capacity of the current HMPT500-3 transmission, and will require design changes to increase torque capacity and ratio range. The

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 21 AUG 2012 2. REPORT TYPE Journal Article 3. DATES COVERED 21-08-2012 to 21-08-2012 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Linear Algebraic Modeling of Power Flow in the HMP500-3 Transmission 6. AUTHOR(S) Matthew McGough 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army TARDEC,6501 E.11 Mile Rd,Warren,MI,48397-5000 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army TARDEC, 6501 E.11 Mile Rd, Warren, MI, 48397-5000 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER #23112 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) TARDEC 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) #23112 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Submitted to 2012 NDIA Ground Vehicle Systems Engineering and Technology Symposium August 14-16 Troy, Michigan 14. ABSTRACT The HMPT500-3 is a split torque path hydrostatic / mechanical continuously variable transmission used in the Bradley Fighting Vehicle. Power transmission and steering is accomplished through the interaction of six planetary gear sets and two variable displacement hydrostatic pump / motor units (HSUs). Power flow in the HMPT500-3 is extremely complex, with numerous feedback paths within the planetary gear train. Without a clearly defined power flow path from gear set to gear set, the analysis cannot be handled in the conventional stepwise manner. The complete speed and torque equation sets must be solved simultaneously for all components. A linear algebraic approach was developed to model forward operation of the HMPT500-3 without steering. The left and right HSUs are lumped in a single unit, and the steering differential is ignored. A reduced set of 14 simultaneous equations for speed and 14 simultaneous equations for torque enable modeling of the ideal (lossless) power flow in the transmission for all forward ranges. Transmission losses are then estimated based on the speed and torque for each individual component, allowing the transmission overall efficiency to be calculated. 15. SUBJECT TERMS 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified Same as Report (SAR) 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 9 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON

Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

desire to increase vehicle fuel economy and reduce the heat-rejection burden to the cooling system also makes efficiency improvements desirable. Automotive performance models of the BFV to date have used a measured efficiency vs. speed-ratio curve, rather than a detailed physics based model of the transmission. While a detailed report on the development of the HMPT500 exists [1], it is for an earlier configuration without the third range planetary, and does not describe the computational methods used. Only brief abstract level reports covering development of the current HMPT500-3 have been found [2]. A new mathematical model of the current transmission needed to be developed to predict the component level performance impact of design changes, and provide input into the vehicle level models. With the exception of first and reverse ranges, which are purely hydrostatic, power flow in the HMPT500-3 is extremely complex with numerous feedback paths within the planetary gear train. Without a clearly defined power flow path from gear set to gear set, the analysis cannot be handled in the stepwise manner used for conventional transmissions. The complete speed and torque equation sets must be solved simultaneously for all planetary gear sets and HSUs. A linear algebraic approach was developed to model forward operation of the HMPT500-3 without steering. In this model the left and right HSUs are lumped in a single unit, and the steering differential is replaced by a fixed ratio. A reduced set of 14 simultaneous equations for speed and 14 simultaneous equations for torque enable modeling of the ideal (lossless) power flow in the transmission for all forward ranges. Transmission losses can then be estimated based on the speed (e.g. spin losses ) and torque for each individual component. The net transmission output after deducting all losses allows the transmission overall efficiency to be calculated. Expansion of the model to 22 simultaneous speed / torque equations will allow full transmission operation with steering to be modeled. Figure 1, Schematic Governing Equations of the Model The simplified model for forward operation of the HMPT500-3 is comprised of four planetary gear sets and one combined HSU. Each planetary set is further divided into a sun gear, a planetary gear carrier, and a ring gear. The HSU is divided into hydraulically coupled A and B end components, where the A end has variable displacement controlled by the stroke of a hydraulic actuator, and the B end is fixed displacement. These 14 individual elements require 14 independent equations for both rotational speed and torque to be solved. Intermediate shafts and gears are handled implicitly in the governing equations. In the following equations N refers to the number of gear teeth, S to speed (rpm), T to torque (lb-ft) and P to Power (hp). Gear tooth numbers were obtained from the latest drawings based on part numbers from [3], and should be applicable to the current transmission configuration. Page 2 of 9

Each planetary gear set is governed by one speed and two torque equations. The rotating speeds are related by equation (1), with indices 1, 2, 3 referring to the sun, carrier and ring respectively. All equations will be given in homogeneous form as used in the speed and torque matrices. The planetary torque balance is described by equations (2), (3). The HSU A and B ends are governed by one speed (4) and one torque (5) equation, with Z defining the A end stroke actuation, and neglecting any leakage flow. For each intermediate gear or cross shaft the sum of applied torques from all planetary and HSU elements is zero (7). Elements that have clutches or brakes are treated differently in the constraints for each forward range. A braked element has a zero speed value imposed, but still produces a reaction torque. An element that is floating through an open clutch or brake has a zero torque value imposed, but is free to rotate. The only non-homogeneous constraints are for the imposed input speed and torque from the engine. The resulting speed and torque matrix equations for each forward range and HSU stroke are solved separately (8), (9), and the resulting ideal (lossless) power flow calculated (10). The sign convention for speeds and torques is positive for power being input to an element, and negative for power being extracted. This results in a net power balance of zero for each planetary set and HSU. Intermediate gears and shafts connecting planetary and HSU elements are handled by constraint equations. Intermediate gear ratios are implicit in the constraints. For each pair of elements m, n with an imposed speed ratio R not defined by the planetary or HSU equations, there is an equation of the form (6). Losses are deducted for the input driven makeup / auxiliary pumps based on the flow-rates and pressures in [4] to calculate the net engine torque into the transmission. All other losses are calculated after the ideal speed and torque matrices have been solved. Simple mechanical throughput losses are estimated by multiplying the power solution vector with a diagonal loss factor matrix (11). Page 3 of 9

Additional no-load spin losses are applied for the HSUs based on the A end speed and stroke Z as provided in [5]. The net transmission output after deducting all losses allows the transmission overall efficiency to be calculated. Model Output All results presented are for input conditions of 2600 rpm, 1010 lb-ft input torque (500HP net input after fan PTO). Detailed output is shown in figures 3 5 at the end of the paper for legibility. Model output consists of the speed, torque and power of each planetary and HSU element over the HSU stroke range shown in columns 1-3. Plots are grouped by row for 2 nd range, 3 rd range and Output planetary gears, followed by the HSU (refer to fig. 1 for location). In first range (fig 3.) engine speed is constant, providing constant input speed to Second- Range Planetary Sun1 gear and HSU-A (italic text refers to plot line-series). Engine torque is ramped up from zero to maximum and then held constant as the HSU stroke is advanced from 0 to +0.85 to limit pressure in the HSU. First range brakes are applied, holding Second-Range Planetary Ring2, Third-Range Planetary Carrier and Output Planetary Ring gears. The second range brake and third range clutch are released, so Second- Range Planetary Ring1 and Third-Range Planetary Ring gears transmit no torque. As a result, the remaining ungrounded second and third range planetary elements rotate, but do not transmit torque. As the maximum HSU stroke is reached, Second-Range Planetary Ring1 has reached ~0 rpm, ready for the second range brake to engage. Output Planetary Carrier (output from the transmission to the vehicle final drives) speed increases from zero to ~440 rpm. The rated output speed in first range calculated from [6], corrected for the different stroke limit in reverse, is shown for reference (reverse speed was the only available reference point for the purely hydrostatic first / reverse ranges). The Output Planetary Carrier power shown is negative due to the sign convention for power leaving an element. In second range (fig 4.) the engine provides constant input speed to the Second-Range Planetary Sun1 gear and HSU-A. HSU stroke is now reversed from +0.85 to -0.85. This continuity of HSU stroke allows for more rapid shifts. The second range brake is applied, holding Second- Range Planetary Ring1. This makes the first stage a fixed ratio to engine speed, so Second Range Carrier-1 and Carrier-2 (which are joined) rotate at constant speed. The first range brakes and third range clutch are released, so Third-Range Planetary Ring gear transmits no torque. As a result the other third range planetary elements freewheel without transmitting any torque. As the minimum HSU stroke is reached, Third-Range Planetary Ring gear reaches synchronous speed with the input cross shaft, ready for the third range clutch to engage. Output Planetary Carrier speed increases to ~1570 rpm. In third range (fig 5.) the third range clutch is engaged, so Second-Range Planetary Sun1, Third- Range Planetary Ring and HSU-A are all driven at constant speed by the engine. The first and second range brakes are released. As a result Second- Range Planetary Ring1 gear transmits no torque, and the first stage of the second range planetary set freewheels. The second stage is active with feedback to Second Range Planetary Sun2, so both second and third range planetary sets do transmit power in this range. Output Planetary Carrier speed increases to ~3300 rpm as the HSUs are stroked forwards again from -0.85 to +0.85. The rated output speed in high range calculated from [6] is shown for reference. The detailed results show that the model correctly duplicates the HMPT500-3 kinematics using a consistent set of equations, with only minor matrix row variations to apply or release the Page 4 of 9

appropriate clutches / brakes. Output speed increases linearly from zero to maximum rated speed as the transmission shifts through the ranges with constant input speed. Some of the key features of the HMPT series are demonstrated, including HSU stroke continuity and planetary speed synchronization during shifts from range to range [1]. In the idealized model results, power is conserved not only in each planetary set and HSU, but in the entire transmission. The transmitted power levels of certain components exhibit the interesting phenomenon of reactive power, in which circulating power levels can exceed the input power [7]. This has a negative impact on mechanical efficiency. model results, power is conserved not only in each planetary set and HSU, but in the entire transmission. The use of throughput loss factors and spin-losses allows calculation of the net transmission power output, and produces a reasonable approximation of the measured efficiency curve. Modeling of first range operation may be improved by accounting for non-linear losses such as leakage flow in the HSU. In this range the planetary train plays no significant role, and there is no need to solve the complete linear equation set. To calculate overall efficiency, estimated power transmission loss factors were applied of 0.5% for each gear mesh and 5% for each HSU pump / motor element. Additional makeup / auxiliary pump and HSU no-load spin-loss powers were also deducted. The resulting net transmission output produces the efficiency curve shown (fig 2a.) for a power input of 500hp. The calculated efficiency curve shows very good agreement with the measured curve in second and third range, but only fair agreement in first range. The shape of the efficiency curve can be directly correlated to both the hydrostatic power ratio in the transmission, and the mechanical reactive power ratio (fig 2b.). The transmission efficiency is lowest where these values are high, particularly at the beginning of second range operation. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS The model correctly duplicates the HMPT500-3 kinematics in forward operation using a consistent set of linear equations, with only minor variations to apply or release the appropriate clutches / brakes for each transmission range. Output RPM is correctly predicted for each range as HSU stroke is varied, and synchronous shifting is achieved from range to range. In the idealized Figure 2a, 2b Efficiency & Power Ratios Page 5 of 9

The linear model can be expanded to model complete transmission operation, including steering. The full model of the HMPT500-3 is comprised of six planetary gear sets and two HSUs. The resulting 22 individual elements will require 22 independent equations for both rotational speed and torque to be solved. The complete HMPT500-3 transmission model will be used for power-train models that interface with multi-body vehicle dynamics models and require steering for driver-in-the-loop experiments. The model may also be used for preliminary studies of potential transmission improvements to increase ratio range and efficiency, such as changes to the input bevel ratio and use of alternative speed-ratio generators in place of the HSUs. REFERENCES [1] R. Northup, Development and Test of HMPT- 500, Final Engineering Report, Contract DAAE07-72-C-0200, General Electric Ordnance Systems, Dec 1974. [2]J. Lenahan, Extended 3-Range Transmission, IR&D Summary, General Electric Co., Jun 1982 [3]National Maintenance Work Requirement 9-2520-281 with Repair Parts & Special Tools List, Transmission, Crossdrive, Hydromechanical, HMPT500 Series, TACOM LCMC, Oct 2009 [4] Quality Assurance Provision (QAP) 12380360, Makeup / Auxiliary Pump [5] QAP 12446296, Hydraulic Assembly, LH [6]Performance Specification 12446502, Rev G, Transmission, Cross-Drive, Hydromechanical HMPT500-3ECB, Sep 1998; 3.3.9.6 Maximum Forward Ratio, 3.3.9.7 Maximum Reverse Ratio [7]G. Lechner, H. Naunheimer, Automotive Transmissions: Fundamentals, Selection, Design and Application, Springer, Berlin, 1999 DISCLAIMER Reference herein to any specific commercial company, product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or the Department of the Army (DoA). The opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or the DoA, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. Page 6 of 9

Figure 3, First Range Output Page 7 of 9

Figure 4, Second Range Output Page 8 of 9

Figure 5, Third Range Output Page 9 of 9