Ares V Overview. presented at. Ares V Astronomy Workshop 26 April 2008

Similar documents
Ares V: Supporting Space Exploration from LEO to Beyond

Ares I Overview. Phil Sumrall Advanced Planning Manager Ares Projects NASA MSFC. Masters Forum May 14, 2009

Performance Evaluation of a Side Mounted Shuttle Derived Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle for Lunar Exploration

A LEO Propellant Depot System Concept for Outgoing Exploration

Architecture Options for Propellant Resupply of Lunar Exploration Elements

A Model-Based Systems Engineering Approach to the Heavy Lift Launch System Architecture Study

Fly Me To The Moon On An SLS Block II

NASA s Space Launch System Marks Critical Design Review

USA FALCON 1. Fax: (310) Telephone: (310) Fax: (310) Telephone: (310) Fax: (310)

SPACE PROPULSION SIZING PROGRAM (SPSP)

Lunar Surface Access from Earth-Moon L1/L2 A novel lander design and study of alternative solutions

Exploration Architecture Update

CONCEPT STUDY OF AN ARES HYBRID-OS LAUNCH SYSTEM

THE FALCON I LAUNCH VEHICLE Making Access to Space More Affordable, Reliable and Pleasant

lights on, down 2 ½ 40 feet, down 2 ½ Kickin up some dust 30 feet, 2 ½ down faint shadow

NASA Glenn Research Center Intelligent Power System Control Development for Deep Space Exploration

SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM. Steve Creech Manager Spacecraft/Payload Integration & Evolution August 29, 2017 A NEW CAPABILITY FOR DISCOVERY

Solar Electric Propulsion Benefits for NASA and On-Orbit Satellite Servicing

Centurion: A Heavy-Lift Launch Vehicle Family for Cis- Lunar Exploration

AN OPTIMIZED PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR Soyuz/ST

FACT SHEET SPACE SHUTTLE EXTERNAL TANK. Space Shuttle External Tank

The Falcon 1 Flight 3 - Jumpstart Mission Integration Summary and Flight Results. AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, 2008 Paper SSC08-IX-6

Artemis: A Reusable Excursion Vehicle Concept for Lunar Exploration

Analysis of Launch and Earth Departure Architectures for Near-Term Human Mars Missions

MISSION OVERVIEW SLC-41

Upper Stage Evolution

Space Launch System. NASA s Reusable Stages and Liquid Oxygen/Hydrocarbon (LOX/HC) Engines

Future NASA Power Technologies for Space and Aero Propulsion Applications. Presented to. Workshop on Reforming Electrical Energy Systems Curriculum

THE BIMESE CONCEPT: A STUDY OF MISSION AND ECONOMIC OPTIONS

6. The Launch Vehicle

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001

Development of a Low Cost Suborbital Rocket for Small Satellite Testing and In-Space Experiments

July 28, ULA Rideshare Capabilities

Taurus II. Development Status of a Medium-Class Launch Vehicle for ISS Cargo and Satellite Delivery

BIMODAL NUCLEAR THERMAL ROCKET (BNTR) PROPULSION FOR FUTURE HUMAN MARS EXPLORATION MISSIONS

BIMODAL NUCLEAR THERMAL ROCKET (BNTR) PROPULSION FOR FUTURE HUMAN MARS EXPLORATION MISSIONS

ENERGIA 1. IDENTIFICATION. 1.1 Name. 1.2 Classification Family : K Series : K-1/SL-17 Version : 4 strap-ons

Lunar Cargo Capability with VASIMR Propulsion

OMOTENASHI. (Outstanding MOon exploration TEchnologies demonstrated by NAno Semi-Hard Impactor)

Welcome to Vibrationdata

AMBR* Engine for Science Missions

Technical Feasibility Panel for the Human Space Flight Study National Research Council

Suitability of reusability for a Lunar re-supply system

Space Architecture. Master s Thesis Project Jain, Abhishek Dec. 2 nd, 2013

NASA s Choice to Resupply the Space Station

Massachusetts Space Grant Consortium

Next Steps in Human Exploration: Cislunar Systems and Architectures

Paper Session II-A - Lockheed Martin's Next Generation Launch Systems

Atlas V Launches the Orbital Test Vehicle-1 Mission Overview. Atlas V 501 Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, FL Space Launch Complex 41

CHANGING ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING PARADIGMS FOR HUMAN MARS LANDER

Current Launch System Industrial Base

On Orbit Refueling: Supporting a Robust Cislunar Space Economy

Transportation Options for SSP

ULA Briefing to National Research Council. In-Space Propulsion Roadmap. March 22, Bernard Kutter. Manager Advanced Programs. File no.

SOYUZ-IKAR-FREGAT 1. IDENTIFICATION. 1.1 Name. 1.2 Classification Family : SOYUZ Series : SOYUZ Version : SOYUZ-IKAR SOYUZ-FREGAT

TOWARDS A HEAVY LAUNCHER - PROPULSION SOLUTIONS - A. Souchier - C. Rothmund Snecma Moteurs, Direction Grosse Propulsion à Liquides

Vehicle Reusability. e concept e promise e price When does it make sense? MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Vehicle Reusability

LUNAR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH BASE. Yuzhnoye SDO proprietary

ReachMars 2024 A Candidate Large-Scale Technology Demonstration Mission as a Precursor to Human Mars Exploration

Parametric Design MARYLAND

From MARS To MOON. V. Giorgio Director of Italian Programs. Sorrento, October, All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space

USA ATHENA 1 (LLV 1)

AAE STAGING. Ch3 46

The GHOST of a Chance for SmallSat s (GH2 Orbital Space Transfer) Vehicle

Lunar Architecture and LRO

Lunette: A Global Network of Small Lunar Landers

Abstract. 1 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Blue Origin Achievements and plans for the future

Boeing CST-100. Commercial Crew Transportation System. Keith Reiley, The Boeing Company. February, 2011

Copyright 2016 Boeing. All rights reserved.

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Utilizing Lunar Architecture Transportation Elements for Mars Exploration

H-IIA Launch Vehicle Upgrade Development

Input to the Steering Group of the Planetary Society Decadal Survey. Medium Lift Launch Vehicle Solution 22 February 2010

CHAPTER 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION TO LM-3C

Mass Estimating Relations

SmallSats, Iodine Propulsion Technology, Applications to Low-Cost Lunar Missions, and the iodine Satellite (isat) Project.

Enhanced. Chapter 3. Baseline

2012 Cubesat Workshop. ULA Rideshare Update APR 19, 2012

MS1-A Military Spaceplane System and Space Maneuver Vehicle. Lt Col Ken Verderame Air Force Research Laboratory 27 October 1999

Preliminary Cost Analysis MARYLAND

Adrestia. A mission for humanity, designed in Delft. Challenge the future

Lessons in Systems Engineering. The SSME Weight Growth History. Richard Ryan Technical Specialist, MSFC Chief Engineers Office

Critical Design Review

Review of iterative design approach Mass Estimating Relationships (MERs) Sample vehicle design analysis

Case Study: ParaShield

Space Transportation Atlas V / Auxiliary Payload Overview

Cal Poly CubeSat Workshop 2014

USA DELTA DELTA Mc DONNELL DOUGLAS SPACE SYSTEMS

VSS V1.5. This Document Contains No ITAR Restricted Information But Is Not Cleared for General Public Distribution

Vector-R Forecasted Launch Service Guide

MISSION OVERVIEW SLC-41 CCAFS, FL

Mass Estimating Relations

Dual Spacecraft System

Cost Estimation and Engineering Economics

Appenidix E: Freewing MAE UAV analysis

Low Cost Spacelift to LEO, GTO, and Beyond Using the OSP-2 Peacekeeper Space Launch Vehicle

The Apollo 13 Mission Compiled by Daniel R. Adamo

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF A LUNAR IN-SITU RESOURCE UTILIZATION (ISRU) PROPELLANT SERVICES MARKET:

Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES

Transcription:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONSTELLATION Ares V Overview presented at Ares V Astronomy Workshop 26 April 2008 Phil Sumrall Advanced Planning Manager Ares Projects Office Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA www.nasa.gov

7434 2 Introduction The NASA Ares Projects Office is developing the launch vehicles to move the Nation beyond low earth orbit Ares I is a crewed vehicle, and Ares V is a heavy lift vehicle being designed to place cargo on the Moon This is a work-in-progress and we are presenting a snapshot of the ongoing effort The Ares V vehicle will be considered a national asset, and we look forward to opening a dialogue for potential applications with the astronomy community Our goal today is to introduce you to the Ares V vehicle Mission and Vehicle Overview Performance Description

National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONSTELLATION Ares V Mission and Vehicle Overview www.nasa.gov

Building on a Foundation of Proven Technologies Launch Vehicle Comparisons 122 m (400 ft) Overall Vehicle Height, m (ft) 91 m (300 ft) 61 m (200 ft) 30 m (100 ft) Orion Upper Stage (1 J 2X Engine) 137,080 kg (302k lbm) LOX/LH 2 5-Segment Reusable Solid Rocket Booster (RSRB) Altair Earth Departure Stage (EDS) (1 J 2X Engine) 234,486 kg (517k lbm) LOX/LH 2 Core Stage (5 RS 68 Engines) 1,435,526 kg (3.2M lbm) LOX/LH 2 2 5-Segment RSRBs Crew Lunar Lander S-IVB (1 J 2 Engine) 108,862 kg (240k lbm) LOX/LH 2 S-II (5 J 2 Engines) 453,592 kg (1M lbm) LOX/LH 2 S-IC (5 F 1 Engines) 1,769,010 kg (3.9M lbm) LOX/RP-1 DAC 2 TR 5 0 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Shuttle Ares I Ares V Saturn V Height: 56.1 m (184.2 ft) Gross Liftoff Mass: 2,041,166 kg (4.5M lbm) Payload Capability: 25 mt (55k lbm) to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Height: 99.1 m (325 ft) Gross Liftoff Mass: 927,114 kg (2.0M lbm) Payload Capability: 25.6 mt (56.5k lbm) to LEO Height: 109.9 m (360.5 ft) Gross Liftoff Mass: 3,374,875 kg (7.4M lbm) Payload Capability: 63.6 mt (140.2k lbm) to TLI (with Ares I) 55.9 mt (123K lbm) to Direct TLI ~143.4 mt (316k lbm) to LEO Height: 110.9 m (364 ft) Gross Liftoff Mass: 2,948,350 kg (6.5M lbm) Payload Capability: 45 mt (99k lbm) to TLI 119 mt (262k lbm) to LEO 7434 4

Constellation Lunar Sortie Mission - 1.5 Vehicle Launch Solution - 7434 5 Current Ares V concept analyses are based on 67mt payload to TLI requirement (Lunar Lander + Crew Exploration Vehicle) Orbital Insertion at 130 nmi and 29.0 inclination Orbital decay during maximum 4-day loiter period Trans Lunar Injection (TLI) burn of 3175 m/s from 100 nmi

Ares V Ascent Profile for 1.5 Launch DRM - Vehicle 51.0.39 - Core Stage 5 x RS-68 Engines 414.2 sec. Isp, 106.0% Power Lead 33.0 ft (10.0 m) Diameter EDS 1 x J-2X Engine 448.0 sec. Isp,294 lbf Thrust 27.5 ft (10.0 m) Diameter Maximum Dynamic Pressure Time = 79.7 sec Altitude = 13.9 km (45.7 kft) Mach = 1.66 Dynamic Pressure = 29.8 kn/m2 (623 psf) Shroud Separation Time = 304.2 sec Altitude = 123.5 km (405.1 kft) Heating Rate = 1.136 kjoule.m2-sec (0.1 BTU/ft²-sec) Core Main Engine Cutoff and Separation; EDS Ignition Time = 329.0 sec Altitude = 140.8 km (462.0 kft) Mach = 8.79 EDS Engine Cutoff Time = 802.3 sec Sub-Orbital Burn Duration = 472.4 sec Injected Weight = 167,015 kg (372,615 lbm) Orbital Altitude = 240.8 km (130 nmi) circ @ 29.0 EDS TLI Burn Orbital Altitude = 185 km (100 nmi) circ @ 29.0 Burn Duration = 390.4 sec Lunar Lander/CEV Separation SRB Separation Time = 125.9 sec Altitude = 37.9 km (124.4 kft) Mach = 3.77 Dynamic Pressure = 3.97 kn/m2 (83 psf) EDS Disposal Launch Liftoff Time = +1 sec Thrust-to-Weight Ratio = 1.34 GLOW = 3,374,875 kg (7,440,326 lbm) National Aeronautics and Space Administration SRB Splashdown Core Impact in Atlantic Ocean CEV Rendez. & Dock w/eds Time - Assumed Up to 4 Days Orbital Altitude Assumed to Degrade to 185 km (100 nmi) 7434 6

Ares V Elements Altair Lunar Lander Gross Lift Off Weight: 3.4M kg (7.4M lb) Integrated Stack Length: 110 m (360 ft) LV 51.00.39 Payload Shroud Earth Departure Stage (EDS) One Saturn-derived J 2X LOX/LH 2 engine (expendable) 10 m (33-ft) diameter stage Aluminum-Lithium (Al-Li) tanks Composite structures, Instrument Unit and Interstage Primary Ares V avionics system National Aeronautics and Space Administration J 2X Loiter Skirt Interstage Solid Rocket Boosters (2) Two recoverable 5-segment PBAN-fueled boosters (derived from current Ares I first stage Core Stage Five Delta IV-derived RS 68 LOX/ LH 2 engines (expendable) 10 m (33-ft) diameter stage Composite structures Aluminum-Lithium (Al-Li) tanks RS 68 7434 7

Earth Departure Stage Current Design Concept - Expanded View - 7434 8 Altair (Lander) Adapter Usable Propellant: 516,953 lbm Dry Mass: 50,144 lbm Burnout Mass: 55,287 lbm Number of Engines: 1 Engine Type: J-2X Forward Skirt LH2 Tank EDS J-2X Engine Aft Skirt Aluminum-Lithium (Al-Li) Propellant Tanks LOX Tank Composite Dry Structure 10m Outer Diameter Derived from Ares I Upper Stage 4-day On-orbit Loiter Capability prior to Trans-Lunar Injection (TLI) Maintains Orion/Altair/EDS stack attitude in Low Earth Orbit prior to TLI Burn EDS provide 1.5 kw of power to Altair from launch to TLI Loiter Package

Core Stage Current Design Concept - Expanded View - 7434 9 Interstage Forward Skirt Usable Propellant: 3,164,794 lbm Dry Mass: 296,952 lbm Burnout Mass: 331,411 lbm Number of Engines: 5 Engine Type: RS-68 LOX Tank Intertank LH2 Tank Core Stage RS-68 Engines Aluminum-Lithium (Al-Li) Propellant Tanks Composite Dry Structure 10m Outer Diameter Derived from Shuttle External Tank Aft Skirt Engine Thrust Structure Engine Compartment

Ares I/Ares V Connection Instrument Unit J 2X Upper Stage Engine First Stage (5-Segment RSRB) DAC 2 TR 5 Ares I 25.6 MT (56.5k lbm) to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) USAF RS 68 Ares V 63.6 MT (140.2k lbm) to TLI (with Ares I) 55.9 MT (123k lbm) to Direct TLI ~143.4 MT (316k lbm) to LEO National Aeronautics and Space Administration 7434 10

Notional Instrument Unit The Ares I Upper Stage Avionics will provide: Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GN&C) Command and data handling Pre-flight checkout Basic design to be extended to Ares V Instrument Unit Avionics Aft Skirt Avionics Interstage Avionics Thrust Cone Avionics Avionics Mass: 1,114 kg (2,456 lbm) Electrical Power: 5,145 Watts National Aeronautics and Space Administration 7434 11

7434 12 Earth Departure Stage J-2X Engine Turbomachinery Based on J 2S MK 29 design Flexible Inlet Ducts Based on J 2 & J 2S ducts Gas Generator Based on RS 68 design Open-Loop Pneumatic Control Similar to J 2 Engine Controller Based directly on RS 68 design and software architecture HIP-bonded MCC Based on RS 68 demonstrated technology Regeneratively Cooled Nozzle Section Based on long history of RS 27 success Nozzle Extension Based on RL10 B2 Mass: 2,472 kg (5,450 lbm) Thrust: 1.3M N (294k lbm) (vac) Isp: 448 sec (vac) Height: 4.7 m (185 in) Diameter: 3.0 m (120 in)

Ares I Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) Tumble Motors Composite Frustum Modern Electronics Ares I SRB design will be utilized for Ares V 12-Fin Forward Segment Same propellant as Shuttle (PBAN) Optimized for Ares Application New 150 ft diameter parachutes Same cases and joints as Shuttle DAC 2 TR 5 Mass: 731k kg (1.6M lbm) Thrust: 15.8M N (3.5M lbm) Burn Duration: 126 sec Height: 53 m (174 ft) Diameter: 3.7 m (12 ft) National Aeronautics and Space Administration Same Aft Skirt and Thrust Vector Control as Shuttle Booster Deceleration Motors Wide Throat Nozzle 7434 13

Core Stage Upgraded USAF RS-68 Engine * Redesigned turbine nozzles to increase maximum power level by % Redesigned turbine seals to significantly reduce helium usage for pre-launch Other RS-68A upgrades or changes that may be included: Bearing material change New Gas Generator igniter design Improved Oxidizer Turbo Pump temp sensor Improved hot gas sensor 2 nd stage Fuel Turbo Pump blisk crack mitigation Cavitation suppression ECU parts upgrade * Helium spin-start duct redesign, along with start sequence modifications, to help minimize pre-ignition free hydrogen Higher element density main injector improving specific impulse by % and thrust by 4% Increased duration capability ablative nozzle * RS-68A Upgrades

Shroud Shape Trade Study - Initial Trade Space - 7434 15 All shroud options have 9.7m barrel height to accommodate current Lunar Lander configuration.

7434 16 Ares V Summary Schedule Ares V Milestones Technology and Design 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 MCR ATP SRR SDR PDR CDR Technology Maturation DCR LSAM 1 LSAM 3 Ares V-Y LSAM 2 LSAM 4 DAC-1 Requirements DAC-2 Prelim Design Validation DAC-3 Final Design Validation Ground Vibration Testing Core Stage Core Stage Milestones Core Stage Engine (RS-68B) Core Stage Fab and Delivery Booster Payload Shroud Earth Departure Stage EDS Engine (J-2X) Note: Al Design Rev iew dates are Board dates ATP Planning/Test Preparation/Buildup MSFC TS 4550 available Facility Mods Ground Vibration Testing (MSFC TS 4550) Model Correlation/Analysis/Teardown ATP SRR PDR CDR DCR ATP PDR CDR DCR Design / Development Testing Engines Fab/Test/Ship ATP Facility Design Facility Mods Checkout Michoud Facility Modifications Fab CS GVT Test Article and CS MPTA GVT DCR Data Drop MPTA (SSC) LSAM 1 LSAM 3 Ares V-Y LSAM 2 LSAM 4 Ship to GVT (MSFC) SSC B-2 available Facility Mods CS MPTA Testing (SSC B-2) LSAM 1 LSAM 3 Core Stage Fab/Test/Ship Ares V-Y LSAM 2 LSAM 4 ATP Design Empty RSRM to GVT (MSFC) RSRM GVT Test Articles Fab/Test/Ship Inert RSRM to GVT (MSFC) LSAM 1 LSAM 3 Booster Fab/Test/Ship Ares V-Y LSAM 2 LSAM 4 ATP SRR PDR CDR DCR Design / Development Payload Shroud GVT Test Article Fab/Test/Ship Payload Shroud Separation/Vibration/Thermal Testing at GRC Shroud Fab/Test/Ship ATP Design / Development Ship to GVT (MSFC) LSAM 1 LSAM 3 Ares V-Y LSAM 2 LSAM 4 SSC A-1 available SSC A-1 Test Stand Facility Conversion EDS MPTA Testing (SSC A-1) ATP GRC B2 Facility Refurbishment J-2X and EDS Orbital Environments Testing (GRC B2) ATP Fabricate EDS GVT Test Article and EDS MPTA Earth Departure Stage Fab/Test/Ship ATP Long Lead Ship to MPTA (SSC) Long Lead Fabricate GVT EDS Engine Sim & EDS Engine MPTA Earth Departure Stage Engine Fab/Test/Ship Ship to GVT (MSFC) LSAM 1 LSAM 3 Ares V-Y LSAM 2 LSAM 4 Ship to EDS LSAM 1 LSAM 3 Ares V-Y LSAM 2 LSAM 4

National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONSTELLATION Ares V Performance Description www.nasa.gov

7434 18 Ares V 51.0.39 Reference Baseline EDS Stage Propellants Usable Propellant Propellant Offload Stage liftoff pmf Launch Dry Mass TLI Burnout Mass Suborbital Burn Propellant Pre-TLI Jettison Mass LEO FPR # Engines / Type Engine Thrust (100%) Engine Isp (100%) Mission Power Level Suborbital Burn Time TLI Burn Time 4 day LEO loiter LOX/LH2 516,953 lbm 0.0 % 0.8808 50,144 lbm 55,287 lbm 310,000 lbm 6,895 lbm 7,804 lbm 1 / J-2X 294,000 lbf / 238,000 lbf @ Vac 448.0 sec / 449.0 sec @ Vac 100.0 % / 81.0 % 472.4 sec 390.4 sec Delivery Orbit 1.5 Launch TLI LEO Delivery 130 nmi circular @ 29.0 TLI Payload from 100 nmi 140,177 lbm (63.6 t) CEV Mass44,500 lbm (20.2 t) LSAM Mass95,677 lbm (43.4 t) Insertion Altitude 131.6 nmi T/W @ Liftoff + 1 sec 1.34 179.2' Max Dynamic Pressure 623 psf Max g s Ascent Burn 3.90 g T/W @ SRB Separation 1.32 T/W Second Stage 0.43 T/W @ TLI Ignition 0.58 33.0' 71.1' 73.8' 360.5' 215.6' Vehicle Concept Characteristics GLOW Payload Envelope L x D Shroud Jettison Mass Booster (each) Propellants Overboard Propellant Stage pmf Burnout Mass # Boosters / Type Booster Thrust (@ 1.0 sec) Booster Isp (@ 1.0 sec) Burn Time Core Stage Propellants Usable Propellant Propellant Offload Stage pmf Dry Mass Burnout Mass # Engines / Type Engine Thrust (108%) Engine Isp (108%) Mission Power Level Core Burn Time Interstage Dry Mass 7,440,326 lbf 25.3 ft x 30.0 ft 19,388 lbm PBAN (262-07 Trace) 1,390,548 lbm 0.8628 221,175 lbm 2 / 5 Segment SRM 3,571,974 lbf @ Vac 272.8 sec @ Vac 125.9 sec LOX/LH2 3,164,794 lbm 0.0 % 0.9052 296,952 lbm 331,411 lbm 5 / RS-68 702,055 lbf @ SL 797,000 lbf @ Vac 360.8 sec @ SL 414.2 sec @ Vac 108.0 % 328.9 sec Core/EDS 18,672 lbm

7434 19 Current Ares V Shroud Concept 4.44 m [ 14.6 ft] 7.50 m [ 24.6 ft] 7.50 m [ 24.6 ft] 9.70 m [ 31.8 ft] Useable Volume ~860 m 3 ~[30,371 ft 3 ] 9.70 m [ 31.8 ft] 8.80 m [ 28.9 ft] 10.0 m [ 33.0 ft] meters [feet]

Preliminary Aero-acoustic Analysis - Transonic and Max-Q Acoustics - 7434 20 Predicted ascent maxacoustic levels Conceptual design based on acoustic blanket thicknesses used on Cassini mission Table I. Estimated max Overall Fluctuating Pressure Level (OAFPL) on Shroud external regions Zone I IIa IIb IIIa IIIb Criteria for Max OAFPL Attached Turbulent Boundary Layer Weak Transonic Shock Attached Turbulent Boundary Layer Strong Transonic Shock & Separation Weak Transonic Shock Expected Mach # for max OAFPL 1.65 0.93 1.65 0.85 0.85 Q (psf) 707 520 707 475 475 Crms 0.007 0.07 0.007 0.12 0.035 OAFPL (db) 142 159 142 163 152

Preliminary Aerothermal Analysis - Mission Maximum Temperature - 7434 21

Preliminary Structural Analysis - Maximum Static Deflection - 7434 22 1.88 in. Max Qα Deflection Plot Access Petal side inches

7434 23 Ares V LEO Performance Ares V Payload vs. Altitude & Inclination Inclination = 29 deg Inclination = 35 deg Inclination = 40 deg Inclination = 45 deg Inclination = 51.6 deg Payload (tonnes) Circular Orbital Altitude (km)

7434 24 Ares V Escape Performance Ares V Ares V with Centaur V2 Payload vs. C3 Energy Payload (tonnes) At 5.7 mt, the Cassini spacecraft is the largest interplanetary probe and required a C3 of 20 km 2 /s 2. Ares V can support about 35 mt for this same C3. C3 Energy (km 2 /s 2 )

Payload vs. Trip Times for Representative Missions - Constellation POD Shroud - 7434 25 60 55 50 Ares V w/ Centaur Direct (Hohmann Transfer) Ares V only Direct (Hohmann Transfer) Ares I w/ Centaur Direct (Hohmann Transfer) Mass of Payload (mt) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Mars Jupiter C 3 = 9 C 3 = 80 9 mos 2.7 yrs Ceres C 3 = 40 km 2 /s 2 1.3 yrs Saturn C 3 = 106 km 2 /s 2 6.1 yrs Trip Time to Destination (years) Uranus C 3 = 127 km 2 /s 2 15.8 yrs Neptune C 3 = 136 30.6 yrs

Notional Ares V Shroud for Other Missions 4.4 m [ 14.4 ft] 7.5 m [ 24.6 ft] 7.5 m [ 24.6 ft] 18.7 m [ 61.4 ft] National Aeronautics and Space Administration Useable Volume ~1,410 m 3 ~[49,800 ft 3 ] 8.80 m [ 28.9 ft] 18.7 m [ 61.4 ft] 10.0 m [ 33.0 ft] 18.7 m Represents the Maximum Barrel Length for the Shroud Maximum Barrel Length Constrained Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) Height Increased Barrel Length Introduces Theoretical Reduction of Payload Capability of 200 kg 7434 26

Ares V LEO Performance - Extended Shroud - 7434 27 Payload (tonnes) 150 140 130 120 110 100 Ares V Payload vs. Altitude & Inclination Inclination = 29 deg Inclination = 35 deg Inclination = 40 deg Inclination = 45 deg Inclination = 51.6 deg 90 80 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Circular Orbital Altitude (km)

Ares V Escape Performance - Extended Shroud - 7434 28 60 Payload vs. C3 Energy 50 Payload (tonnes) 40 30 20 10 0-2 18 38 58 78 98 C3 Energy (km 2 /s 2 )

Ares V Performance for Selected Missions 1) Sun-Earth L2 Mission Target C3 energy of -0.7 km 2 /s 2 @ 29.0 degrees 2) Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit (GTO) Final orbit: 185 km x 35,786 km @ 27 degrees Intermediate orbit: LEO insertion at 185 km circ. @ 28.5 degrees 3) Geosynchronous Earth Orbit (GEO) Final orbit: 35,786 km circular @ 0 degrees Intermediate orbit: LEO insertion at 185 km circ. @ 28.5 degrees Note: assessed as single burn; no boil-off assumed between burns; 500 lb m knock-down included for additional engine restart 4) Lunar Outpost Cargo (Direct TLI), Reference Target C3 energy of -1.8 km 2 /s 2 @ 29.0 degrees Mission Profile 1) Sun-Earth L2 2) GTO Injection 3) GEO 4) Cargo Lunar Outpost C3 of -1.8 km 2 / (TLI Direct), * Performance Reference impacts from structural s 2 increases 125,300 due to larger 56.8 payloads has 123,700 not been assessed 56.1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Target Constellation POD Shroud Extended Shroud Payload (lb m ) Payload (t) Payload (lb m ) Payload (t) C3 of -0.7 km 2 / s 2 123,100 55.8 121,600 55.1 Transfer DV 8,200 ft/s Transfer DV 14,100 ft/s 155,100* 70.3* 153,700* 69.7* 79,700 36.2 78,700 35.7 7434 29

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Developing Ares V Launch System Mission Planner s Guide 7434 30 Mission Planner Guide Planned for Draft Release in Summer 2008 Interface Definitions Fairings, Adapters Mission Performance Development Timelines Concept of Operations Potential Vehicle Evolution and Enhancements Need Past Astronomy Mission Data

7434 31 Summary The focus of design efforts in the near future will be on the primary Lunar mission. We are currently just beginning to integrate the design functions from the various centers for this mission. We appreciate all thoughts and ideas for different ways to us the Ares V platform

National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONSTELLATION Backup www.nasa.gov

7434 33 Ground Rules and Assumptions All trajectories analyzed using POST3D (Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories - 3 Dimensional) Flight performance reserve is based on the Ares V LEO mission, and is held constant for all cases No gravity assists Interplanetary trip times are based on Hohmann transfers (limited to ~24 years max.) Payload mass estimates are separated spacecraft mass, and include payload adapter and any mission peculiar hardware (if required) Ares V vehicle based on configuration 51.00.39, but w/ Upper Stage burnout mass from configuration 51.00.34 (propellant tanks not resized for high C3 missions)

7434 34 Ground Rules and Assumptions (Cont d) For cases incorporating a kick stage: Ares I and Ares V employ 2-engine Centaur from Atlas V Additional adapter mass of 6,400 lbm assumed No adjustments to aerodynamic data Propellant mass for: Ares V LEO missions: held constant at 310,000 lbm Ares I and V C3 missions and Ares I LEO missions: maximum propellant load No Upper Stage propellant off-loading for Ares I and Ares V C3 cases Transfer orbit to Sun-Earth L2 point is a direct transfer w/ C3 = -0.7 km2/s2 Payload can be increased by using a lunar swingby maneuver All cases targeting a C3 are of longer duration than the J-2X constraint of 500 seconds

7434 35 Sun-Earth Lagrange Points The figure shows the Lagrange points associated with the Sun-Earth system L2 roughly 1.5 million kilometers beyond Earth L1, L2, and L3 are unstable, so any spacecraft placed there must do stationkeeping Typically insert the spacecraft into a halo orbit about the Lagrange point, such as shown about L2.

Shapes Delivered to MSFC (2/25/08) to Support Upcoming Wind Tunnel Test 7434 36