IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:99-mc Document 458 Filed 06/05/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

FILED 2017 Mar-23 PM 12:37 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/17/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:99-mc Document 293 Filed 06/27/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:18-cv MSD-LRL Document 1 Filed 06/14/18 Page 1 of 29 PageID# 1

Case 3:16-cv K Document 1 Filed 04/15/16 Page 1 of 21 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 07/27/16 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

PlainSite. Legal Document. Texas Western District Court Case No. 1:15-cv RP Yeti Coolers, LLC v. RTIC Coolers, LLC. Document 64.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 3:10-cv JGH Document 1 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 3:16-cv N Document 13 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 44 PageID 113 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2:16-cv GER-APP Doc # 3 Filed 04/28/16 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 7

PlainSite. Legal Document. Texas Western District Court Case No. 1:15-cv RP Yeti Coolers, LLC v. RTIC Coolers, LLC. Document 1.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/26/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:17-cv JKB Document 1 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 30. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Southern Division)

Filing # E-Filed 09/12/ :15:57 PM

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Case 3:12-cv BHS Document 1 Filed 08/01/12 Page 1 of 16

Case Doc 7 Filed 02/28/17 Page 1 of 11. IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Greenbelt Division)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

Case: 1:17-cv PAG Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/28/17 1 of 21. PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

CAUSE NO RUBICON GLOBAL, LLC IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF. v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Counter-Defendant 125th JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Case 1:11-cv RPM Document 1 Filed 12/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Maryland Lemon Law Statute. For Free Maryland Lemon Law Help Click Here

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

mew Doc 2578 Filed 02/16/18 Entered 02/16/18 12:17:29 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

Case 2:18-cv SJF-AYS Document 1 Filed 04/04/18 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Kongsberg Automotive Holding v. Teleflex Inc

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No

SANTA CLARA CITY RENEWABLE NET METERING & INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/01/15 Page 1 of 20 Page ID #:1. Deadline.com

Vertabelo Academy. Terms of Service PLEASE READ ALL OF THE FOLLOWING TERMS OF SERVICE BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE A. General Terms

Case 2:05-mc Document 1044 Filed 08/04/16 Page 1 of 35 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PITTSBURGH DIVISION

SENATE BILL lr1706 A BILL ENTITLED. Vehicle Laws Manufacturers, Distributors, and Factory Branches Prohibited Acts

September 2, Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1) This is an action contesting the decision of the Department dated March 24,2016

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:17-cv LEK-DJS Document 1 Filed 03/13/17 Page 1 of 24

MAINE LEMON LAW SUMMARY

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH PURCHASING DEPARTMENT PORTSMOUTH, NEW HAMPSHIRE. Annual Fuel Bid - #01-18 INVITATION TO BID

USAACE & Fort Rucker Preventative Law Program. Alabama Lemon Law

Case KJC Doc 5059 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : :

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM

Monthly Biodiesel Production Report

Case: 2:16-cr ART-CJS Doc #: 3-1 Filed: 07/20/16 Page: 1 of 6 - Page ID#: 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Island Carts, LLC WAIVER, RELEASE OF LIABILITY AND ASSUMPTION OF RISK AGREEMENT

Aamco Transmissions v. James Dunlap

BEFORE THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD COMPLAINT. COME NOW the North America Freight Car Association ("NAFCA") 17884

Case 2:12-cv KJM-DAD Document 1 Filed 12/07/12 Page 1 of 17

Case 4:11-cv MAG -PJK Document 1 Filed 02/09/11 Page 1 of 22

Case 1:19-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/19 Page 1 of 14 : : : : : : : : : : :

Dealer Registration. Please provide the following:

HOUSE AMENDED PRIOR PRINTER'S NOS. 13, 30, 47, PRINTER'S NO , 56 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL

Case bem Doc 854 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 17:13:18 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 53

Case 2:10-cv WOB Document 1 Filed 02/12/2010 Page 1 of 19

Every Disclosure Document issued by a Franchisor Member pursuant to the Code shall comply with the following requirements: -

CITY OF BOISE. ORDINANCE or RESOLUTION NUMBER: Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Parking Ordinance

Respondents. x NATURE OF THE ACTION

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF INSURANCE LEGISLATORS (NCOIL)

Case LSS Doc 707 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11 NOTICE OF APPEAL

PLEASE NOTE Legislative Counsel Office not Table of Public Acts

REGISTRATION PACKET ATLANTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DEALER REGISTRATION PACKAGE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

SANDAG Vanpool Program Guidelines as of February 2018

New Brunswick transitional rules for HST increase

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:14-cv IN RE: Petrobras Securities Litigation. Document 259.

Case 5:17-cv NC Document 1 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 14

mew Doc 2995 Filed 03/30/18 Entered 03/30/18 14:32:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 17. Chapter 11 : : : :

THREE-PARTY VANPOOL INCENTIVE PROGRAM AGREEMENT

Case 1:14-md JMF Document 279 Filed 09/02/14 Page 1 of 8

TOWNSHIP OF RARITAN COUNTY OF HUNTERDON, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE #16-06 REVISED

Case 1:14-md JMF Document Filed 08/11/14 08/10/14 Page 1 of of 7

NEW HAMPSHIRE LEMON LAW SUMMARY

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Senator BOB SMITH District 17 (Middlesex and Somerset)

Assembly Bill No CHAPTER 572

TOWN OF WINDSOR AGENDA REPORT

Monroe County Municipal Waste Hauler Permit Application CALENDAR YEAR 2019

Dear Vendor: Sincerely, Main Street Hagerstown

Joint Venture Agreement ( JVA ) with Nissan in respect of the establishment and operation of NVL ( Proposed Joint Venture ).

H-D USA LLC et al v. Urban Outfitters Inc View Document View Docket

D.P.U A Appendix B 220 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

VENTURA SUPERIOR COUO R"-. GIN A L APR SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORN]A COUNTY OF VENTURA. 4. Violations of the California False ) )

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE NESTE OIL OYJ, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No.: DYNAMIC FUELS, LLC, SYNTROLEUM CORPORATION, and TYSON FOODS, INC., Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Neste Oil Oyj ( Neste Oil, by and for its Complaint for patent infringement against Defendants Dynamic Fuels, LLC ( Dynamic Fuels, Syntroleum Corporation ( Syntroleum, and Tyson Foods, Inc. ( Tyson Foods, alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action for patent infringement of Neste Oil s U.S. Patent No. 8,187,344 ( the 344 patent directed to fuel compositions. THE PARTIES 2. Neste Oil is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Finland, with its corporate headquarters at Keilaranta, P.O. Box 95, 00095 NESTE OIL, Finland. 3. Neste Oil is engaged in researching, developing, manufacturing, and selling transportation fuels and other products. Neste Oil has developed a renewable diesel fuel that it has begun marketing in the United States under the name NExBTL.

4. Dynamic Fuels is a Delaware limited liability company having its principal place of business at 445 North Boulevard, Geismar, Louisiana 70802. 5. Dynamic Fuels is a joint venture of Syntroleum and Tyson Foods. 6. Syntroleum is a Delaware corporation having its corporate offices and principal place of business at 5416 South Yale Avenue, Suite 400, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135. Syntroleum regularly conducts business in the State of Delaware and uses the offices of the State of Delaware to conduct its business. This conduct includes but is not limited to using the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act to govern its joint venture with Tyson Foods; selecting Delaware as the corporate home for four of its wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries; and using the Delaware General Corporation Law to conduct its business. In 2005, Syntroleum merged one of its subsidiaries into itself under the Delaware General Corporation Law. 7. Tyson Foods is a Delaware corporation having its corporate offices and principal place of business at 2200 Don Tyson Parkway, Springdale, Arkansas 72762. Tyson Foods regularly conducts business in the State of Delaware and uses the offices of the State of Delaware to conduct its business. This conduct includes but is not limited to bringing litigation in the Delaware court systems; using the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act to govern its joint venture with Syntroleum; selecting Delaware as the corporate home for forty-three of its approximately fifty-two wholly owned U.S. subsidiaries; using Delaware as the corporate home for its primary international subsidiaries; and using the Delaware General Corporation Law to conduct its business. On information and belief, Tyson Foods primarily operates its international subsidiaries through two wholly owned Delaware subsidiaries, Cobb-Vantress, Inc. and New Canada Holdings, Inc. -2-

JURISDICTION, VENUE, AND JOINDER 8. This civil action for patent infringement arises under the Patent Laws of the United States, Title 35, United States Code. 9. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a. 10. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400. 11. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants. 12. Defendants are properly joined in this action under 35 U.S.C. 299. COUNT I: DIRECT INFRINGEMENT 13. On May 29, 2012, the 344 patent, entitled Fuel Composition for a Diesel Engine, was duly and lawfully issued to Neste Oil by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ( PTO. Neste Oil owns the 344 patent and holds all right, title, and interest in the 344 patent, including the rights to sue for infringement and to seek damages and injunctive relief. A copy of the 344 patent is attached as Exhibit A. 14. The 344 patent discloses and claims fuel compositions. 15. On information and belief, after the 344 patent issued, Defendants made, used, offered to sell, or sold synthetic renewable diesel fuels ( the Accused Products in the United States, including Accused Products produced at Dynamic Fuels plant in Geismar, Louisiana. 16. Defendants have directly infringed at least one claim of the 344 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(a. Defendants infringing acts include their making, using, offering for sale, or selling the Accused Products in the United States. 17. Defendants have no license or other authorization to use the inventions described and claimed in the 344 patent. -3-

COUNT II: ACTIVE INDUCEMENT OF INFRINGEMENT 18. Neste Oil incorporates by reference the allegations of paragraphs 1-17 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. 19. In 2007, Syntroleum and Tyson Foods formed Dynamic Fuels as a 50/50 joint venture. The primary objective of the joint venture was to build and operate one or more refineries capable of producing the Accused Products from biological feedstocks. Tyson Foods would supply the necessary biological feedstocks such as animal fats, greases, and vegetable oils. Syntroleum would provide engineering services and related technical support. Syntroleum and Tyson Foods selected a location in Geismar, Louisiana to build the first Dynamic Fuels plant. 20. Construction of the Dynamic Fuels plant in Geismar, Louisiana began in October 2008 and was completed in October 2010. Syntroleum and Tyson Foods invested more than $150 million to construct this plant. 21. In November 2010, Syntroleum and Tyson Foods announced the start of commercial production of the Accused Products at the Dynamic Fuels plant. Since that time Dynamic Fuels has been selling substantial volumes of Accused Products to distributors, customers, and others in the United States. The Dynamic Fuels plant is designed to produce up to 75 million gallons of Accused Products each year. 22. On February 1, 2012, the PTO issued a Notice of Allowance with a Notice of Allowability in the patent application corresponding to the 344 patent. On or about that same day, both documents became publicly available to the Defendants and others on the PTO s website, PAIR. The Notice of Allowability specified that application claims 23 to 42 were allowed. -4-

23. On May 9, 2012, the PTO issued an Issue Notification stating that the 344 patent would issue on May 29, 2012. That Issue Notification became publicly available to the Defendants and others by May 10, 2012. 24. Distributors, customers, and others who purchase the Accused Products in the United States use them as diesel fuels in a manner that directly infringes at least one claim of the 344 patent. 25. From at least the date of this complaint, Defendants know or should know that their steps in actively advertising, marketing, packaging, offering for sale, selling, or distributing the Accused Products cause, urge, encourage, or aid distributors, customers, and others to directly infringe at least one claim of the 344 patent. Defendants have therefore actively induced infringement of the 344 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(b. 26. Syntroleum knows or should know that its steps in actively providing engineering services, technical assistance, financial support, and other services and products to Dynamic Fuels cause, urge, encourage, or aid Dynamic Fuels and others to directly infringe at least one claim of the 344 patent. Dynamic Fuels would be unable to commercially produce and sell the Accused Products in the United States without Syntroleum s engineering services, technical assistance, financing, and other support. Syntroleum has therefore actively induced infringement of the 344 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(b. 27. Tyson Foods knows or should know that its steps in actively providing biological feedstocks and financial support to Dynamic Fuels cause, urge, encourage, or aid Dynamic Fuels and others to directly infringe at least one claim of the 344 patent. Dynamic Fuels would be unable to commercially produce and sell the Accused Products in the United States without -5-

Tyson Foods biological feedstocks, financing, and other support. Tyson Foods has therefore actively induced infringement of the 344 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(b. DAMAGES AND OTHER HARM SUFFERED BY NESTE OIL 28. Neste Oil has been damaged in an amount not yet determined as a result of the infringing activities complained of herein. Neste Oil has also been irreparably harmed by Defendants patent infringement. Neste Oil will continue to suffer damages and irreparable harm until this Court permanently enjoins Defendants from further infringement of the 344 patent. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Neste Oil respectfully requests that this Court enter a judgment: (1 finding Defendants liable to Neste Oil for infringement of the 344 patent; (2 permanently enjoining Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and those other persons or entities in active concert or participation with them, from infringing any claim of the 344 patent until the 344 patent expires; (3 awarding Neste Oil damages adequate to compensate it for Defendants infringement of the 344 patent, together with pre- and post-judgment interest on all damages; and -6-

(4 awarding Neste Oil reasonable attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. 285, costs of suit, and such further and additional relief as this Court deems just and proper. Of Counsel: /s/ John W. Shaw John W. Shaw (No. 3362 Karen E. Keller (No. 4489 SHAW KELLER LLP 300 Delaware Avenue Suite 1120 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302 298-0700 Attorneys for Neste Oil Oyj Michael J. Flibbert Megan R. Leinen FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 901 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001-4413 (202 408-4000 Dated: May 29, 2012-7-