Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Similar documents
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Austin TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pittsburgh PA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New Orleans LA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Portland OR-WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Oklahoma City OK. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Buffalo NY. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Fresno CA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Hartford CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boise ID. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Tucson AZ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Wichita KS. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Spokane WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Grand Rapids MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Toledo OH-MI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Pensacola FL-AL. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Omaha NE-IA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Allentown PA-NJ. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Nashville-Davidson TN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Corpus Christi TX. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Boston MA-NH-RI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - El Paso TX-NM. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Minneapolis-St. Paul MN-WI. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - New York-Newark NY-NJ-CT. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

2016 Congestion Report

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Signal System Timing and Phasing Program SAMPLE. Figure 1: General Location Map. Second St.

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

New Jersey Pilot Study Testing Potential MAP-21 System Performance Measures

Metropolitan Freeway System 2007 Congestion Report

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions Through Congestion Management

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

VILLASPORT ATHLETIC CLUB AND SPA Draft Environmental Impact Report. Volume I

Act 229 Evaluation Report

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Urban Transportation in the United States: A Time for Leadership

2017 Mobility Report

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Congestion Management. SFMTA Board Annual Workshop January 29, 2019

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Final Report. Investigating the Effect of Freeway Congestion Thresholds on Decision-Making Inputs. Tongbin Qu

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Craigieburn Employment Precinct North and English Street

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

Online Appendix for Subways, Strikes, and Slowdowns: The Impacts of Public Transit on Traffic Congestion

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Click to edit Master title style

Annex 10: Equations used for Direct Cost Calculation

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

AUGUST 2015 URBAN MOBILITY. Scorecard

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

1 On Time Performance

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

The Highway Safety Manual: Will you use your new safety powers for good or evil? April 4, 2011

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Operate a Reliable and Convenient. Becky Allmeroth, State Maintenance Engineer. Tracker. Measures of Departmental Performance

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Transcription:

Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance measure that experts agree says it all. A few key points should be recognized by users of the Urban Mobility Scorecard data. Use the trends The multi-year performance measures are better indicators, in most cases, than any single year. Examining a few measures over many years reduces the chance that data variations or the estimating procedures may have caused a "spike" in any single year. (5 years is 5 times better than 1 year.) Use several measures Each performance measure illustrates a different element of congestion. (The view is more interesting from atop several measures.) Compare to similar regions Congestion analyses that compare areas with similar characteristics (for example, population, growth rate, road and public transportation system design) are usually more insightful than comparisons of different regions. (Los Angeles is not Peoria.) Compare ranking changes and performance measure values In some performance measures a small change in the value may cause a significant change in rank from one year to the next. This is the case when there are several regions with nearly the same value. (15 hours is only 1 hour more than 14 hours.) Consider the scope of improvement options Any improvement project in a corridor within most of the regions will only have a modest effect on the regional congestion level. (To have an effect on areawide congestion, there must be significant change in the system or service.) Performance Measures and Definition of Terms Travel Time Index A measure of congestion that focuses on each trip and each mile of travel. It is calculated as the ratio of travel time in the peak period to travel time in free-flow. A value of 1.30 indicates that a 20-minute free-flow trip takes 26 minutes in the peak. Planning Time Index A travel time reliability measure that represents the total travel time that should be planned for a trip. Computed with the 95th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a commute trip to be late for only 1 day a month. If it is computed with the 80th percentile travel time it represents the amount of time that should be planned for a trip to be late for only 1 day a week. A PTI of 2.00 means that for a 20-minute trip in light traffic, 40 minutes should be planned. Peak Commuters Number of travelers who begin a trip during the morning or evening peak travel periods (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). "Commuters" are private vehicle users unless specifically noted. per Commuter A yearly sum of all the per-trip delays for those persons who travel in the peak period (6 to 10 a.m. and 3 to 7 p.m.). This measure illustrates the effect of traffic slowdowns as well as the length of each trip. Total Delay The overall size of the congestion problem. Measured by the total travel time above that needed to complete a trip at free-flow speeds. The ranking of total delay usually follows the population ranking (larger regions usually have more delay). Free-Flow Speeds These values are derived from overnight speeds in the INRIX speed database. They are used as the national comparison thresholds. Other speed thresholds may be appropriate for urban project evaluations or sub-region studies. Excess Fuel Consumed Increased fuel consumption due to travel in congested conditions rather than freeflow conditions. Congestion Cost Value of travel delay for 2014 (estimated at $17.67 per hour of person travel and $94.04 per hour of truck time) and excess fuel consumption estimated using state average cost per gallon. Urban Area The developed area (population density more than 1,000 persons per square mile) within a metropolitan region. The urban area boundaries change frequently (every year for most growing areas), so increases include both new growth and development that was previously in areas designated as rural. Number of Rush Hours Time when the road system might have congestion.

Inventory Measures 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Population (1000s) 1,200 1,170 1,140 1,100 1,070 Rank 38 40 40 40 40 Commuters (1000s) 598 595 579 558 541 Freeway 12,776 12,416 12,285 12,797 12,582 Arterial Streets 10,348 10,225 9,770 10,066 9,897 Value of Time ($/hour) 17.67 17.39 17.14 16.79 16.30 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 94.04 89.60 89.56 86.81 88.12 Gasoline ($/gallon) 3.19 3.44 3.49 3.32 2.70 Diesel ($/gallon) 3.57 3.89 3.89 3.64 2.93 System Performance 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) 31 -- -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) 24 -- -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") 4.20 -- -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 13,760 13,658 13,138 12,619 12,232 Rank 50 49 50 51 51 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 17 17 16 16 15 Rank 70 68 69 69 71 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 34,153 33,900 32,610 31,320 30,360 Rank 46 46 46 46 46 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 43 43 42 42 42 Rank 35 34 36 35 34 Travel Time Index 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.23 Rank 29 28 28 25 25 Commuter Stress Index 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.28 1.28 Rank 30 30 30 30 31 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) 2.61 -- -- -- -- Rank 24 -- -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 770 777 758 743 743 Rank 47 46 46 46 46 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 963 971 948 929 929 Rank 44 43 47 51 54

Inventory Measures 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Population (1000s) 1,045 1,010 990 980 965 Rank 41 43 43 43 45 Commuters (1000s) 526 507 493 485 474 Freeway 12,000 11,620 11,775 11,500 10,985 Arterial Streets 9,400 9,270 9,420 9,115 9,015 Value of Time ($/hour) 16.01 16.10 15.47 15.06 14.58 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 89.75 81.52 82.56 80.43 78.05 Gasoline ($/gallon) 2.24 3.42 2.95 2.62 2.27 Diesel ($/gallon) 2.53 4.11 3.33 2.80 2.44 System Performance 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 11,923 12,810 12,519 11,900 11,211 Rank 51 51 51 52 52 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 15 16 16 15 14 Rank 68 68 69 67 71 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 29,593 31,795 31,073 29,535 27,826 Rank 46 46 46 46 47 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 42 47 47 45 44 Rank 32 25 25 29 29 Travel Time Index 1.23 1.25 1.25 1.24 1.23 Rank 26 22 26 26 27 Commuter Stress Index 1.28 1.31 1.31 1.30 1.29 Rank 31 26 29 30 30 Total Cost ($ millions) 736 788 800 781 761 Rank 46 46 47 47 48 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 921 985 1,000 977 951 Rank 55 48 51 57 61

Inventory Measures 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Population (1000s) 955 940 910 865 830 Rank 44 42 43 45 46 Commuters (1000s) 467 457 436 407 385 Freeway 10,000 9,200 8,700 8,100 7,640 Arterial Streets 8,700 8,300 7,990 7,480 7,000 Value of Time ($/hour) 14.10 13.73 13.43 13.22 12.85 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 74.17 72.23 70.86 71.38 70.47 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.89 1.46 1.33 1.43 1.46 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.90 1.47 1.32 1.47 1.44 System Performance 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 10,913 10,507 9,850 8,810 8,030 Rank 51 52 52 53 54 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 14 13 12 11 10 Rank 68 71 73 74 77 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 27,085 26,079 24,448 21,868 19,931 Rank 46 46 47 48 48 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 43 42 41 39 38 Rank 28 31 32 36 36 Travel Time Index 1.23 1.23 1.22 1.21 1.20 Rank 28 27 28 28 28 Commuter Stress Index 1.29 1.29 1.28 1.27 1.26 Rank 30 30 30 30 32 Total Cost ($ millions) 765 756 725 659 618 Rank 48 49 48 49 51 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 957 946 907 824 772 Rank 58 59 59 67 72

Inventory Measures 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Population (1000s) 785 755 720 685 660 Rank 47 48 49 50 50 Commuters (1000s) 358 339 318 298 282 Freeway 7,000 6,380 6,200 5,200 4,485 Arterial Streets 6,510 6,000 5,455 5,120 4,960 Value of Time ($/hour) 12.43 12.17 11.98 11.71 11.37 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 66.76 65.76 66.83 66.20 64.27 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.05 1.02 1.14 1.21 1.13 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.06 1.12 1.20 1.28 1.19 System Performance 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 7,207 6,559 6,016 5,504 5,030 Rank 56 57 57 59 61 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 9 8 8 7 6 Rank 77 78 74 77 81 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 17,889 16,280 14,933 13,662 12,484 Rank 52 52 53 53 52 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 36 35 34 33 32 Rank 40 39 38 38 34 Travel Time Index 1.20 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.17 Rank 26 27 28 26 29 Commuter Stress Index 1.25 1.24 1.24 1.23 1.23 Rank 31 33 32 31 31 Total Cost ($ millions) 573 533 497 465 437 Rank 53 53 54 54 55 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 716 666 621 581 547 Rank 74 75 75 76 75

Inventory Measures 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Population (1000s) 635 620 600 560 540 Rank 53 52 54 56 57 Commuters (1000s) 267 257 245 224 213 Freeway 4,095 3,700 3,300 2,800 2,650 Arterial Streets 4,875 4,795 4,700 4,605 4,500 Value of Time ($/hour) 11.06 10.78 10.47 10.17 9.75 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 62.23 60.84 59.01 57.31 55.03 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.02 1.07 1.08 1.12 1.08 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.08 1.13 1.15 1.21 1.07 System Performance 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 4,656 4,353 4,017 3,642 3,177 Rank 61 61 61 59 62 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 6 5 5 5 4 Rank 79 79 77 72 77 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 11,556 10,804 9,970 9,040 7,885 Rank 52 52 53 53 53 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 31 30 29 28 26 Rank 32 29 28 25 27 Travel Time Index 1.17 1.16 1.15 1.15 1.14 Rank 26 26 26 23 25 Commuter Stress Index 1.22 1.22 1.21 1.21 1.19 Rank 31 30 29 27 28 Total Cost ($ millions) 416 399 379 354 322 Rank 53 53 54 55 55 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 520 499 474 443 403 Rank 74 74 75 75 77

Inventory Measures 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Population (1000s) 530 520 500 485 445 Rank 56 56 59 60 64 Commuters (1000s) 208 202 193 185 169 Freeway 2,270 1,915 1,800 1,780 1,650 Arterial Streets 4,390 4,300 4,220 4,100 4,000 Value of Time ($/hour) 9.25 8.83 8.48 8.18 8.03 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 52.81 50.04 48.53 46.57 47.83 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.08 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.28 Diesel ($/gallon) 0.98 0.91 0.91 0.89 1.16 System Performance 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 2,854 2,574 2,327 2,072 1,775 Rank 60 61 62 66 67 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 4 3 3 3 2 Rank 72 79 77 71 82 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 7,084 6,388 5,777 5,142 4,406 Rank 54 54 55 57 58 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 24 22 21 19 18 Rank 28 32 30 37 35 Travel Time Index 1.13 1.12 1.11 1.10 1.10 Rank 27 27 29 32 26 Commuter Stress Index 1.18 1.17 1.17 1.16 1.15 Rank 31 32 31 31 31 Total Cost ($ millions) 305 288 271 250 219 Rank 55 58 58 59 61 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 381 360 339 313 273 Rank 77 77 77 80 81

Inventory Measures 1984 1983 1982 Population (1000s) 425 420 415 Rank 65 65 65 Commuters (1000s) 160 157 153 Freeway 1,600 1,510 1,410 Arterial Streets 3,700 3,400 3,290 Value of Time ($/hour) 7.75 7.43 7.20 Commercial Cost ($/hour) 46.47 44.23 43.08 Gasoline ($/gallon) 1.29 1.32 1.38 Diesel ($/gallon) 1.17 1.20 1.26 System Performance 1984 1983 1982 Congested Travel (% of peak VMT) -- -- -- Congested System (% of lane-miles) -- -- -- Congested Time (number of "Rush Hours") -- -- -- Total Fuel (1000 gallons) 1,609 1,434 1,279 Rank 65 65 67 Fuel per Peak Auto Commuter (gallons) 2 2 2 Rank 78 68 62 Total Delay (1000s of person-hours) 3,993 3,558 3,174 Rank 61 61 61 Delay per Peak Auto Commuter (pers-hrs) 17 16 14 Rank 34 32 40 Travel Time Index 1.09 1.08 1.08 Rank 29 33 28 Commuter Stress Index 1.15 1.14 1.13 Rank 31 31 30 Freeway Planning Time Index (95th Pctile) -- -- -- Rank -- -- -- Total Cost ($ millions) 205 191 176 Rank 62 62 64 Cost per Peak Auto Commuter ($) 256 238 219 Rank 82 80 81