Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc Hazeldean Road. Transportation Impact Study. Ottawa, Ontario. Project ID

Similar documents
Provide an overview of the development proposal including projected site traffic volumes;

Re: Cyrville Road Car Dealership

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study


Re: Residential Development - Ogilvie/Cummings Transportation Overview

LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW

Village of Richmond Transportation Brief

Barrhaven Honda Dealership. Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON. Transportation Brief

Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village

Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1

Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois

Salvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017

April Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 102 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief

APPENDICES. APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets

Paisley & Whitelaw - Paisley Park OPA / ZBA for Mixed Density Residential Use

Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February 1, 2010 COPIES: OUR FILE: SUBJECT: TO:

1012 & 1024 McGarry Terrace

Ref. No Task 3. April 28, Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th

MEMORANDUM November 19, 2012

Rockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality

KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis

Traffic Impact Study. Eastern Springs. A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY. April Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers

JRL consulting. March Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3

ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009

APPENDIX G. Traffic Data

Final Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet)

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

Appendix B: Traffic Reports

Wellington Street West

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri. Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study

Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis

(A) Project Manager, Infrastructure Approvals

One Harbor Point Residential

267 O Connor Street Residential Development

Date: December 20, Project #:

6111 and 6141 Hazeldean Road Stittsville, Ontario. Proposed Residential Development Transportation Impact Study

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA

RE: Taggart Retail Site Plan: Kanata West Proposal for Traffic Impact Study: Addendum #2

RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS

Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report

2405 Mer Bleue Orleans, (Ottawa), ON Community Transportation Study Mattamy Homes. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Version 2

1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief

Half Moon Bay North Apartment Block Transportation Impact Assessment. Full Report. March 15, Prepared for: Mattamy Homes.

STANDARD LIMITATIONS

MEMORANDUM. Date: November 4, Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company. Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis WC

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI

Prepared For: Toronto Transit Commission 1138 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 3H2. Prepared By:

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Upper Broadway Road Diet Summary of Findings

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Parking/Traffic Assessment Study

CitiGate Retail Development

Lakeside Terrace Development

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for:

Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development

June 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

Zachary Bugg, PhD, Diego Arguea, PE, and Phill Worth University of Oregon North Campus Conditional Use Permit Application Transportation Assessment

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

700 Hunt Club Road. Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1. Submitted by:

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF CANADA 1021 THOMAS SPRATT PLACE TRANSPORTATION BRIEF

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Minto Mahogany Stage 2

BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

MMM Group Limited. Communities. Transportation. Buildings. Infrastructure

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

Proposed Pit Development

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis

C. iv) Analysis/Results

Transcription:

Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc. 5731 Hazeldean Road Transportation Impact Study Ottawa, Ontario Project ID 160401195 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. March 2016

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 STUDY PURPOSE... 1 1.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT... 1 1.3 SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT... 4 2.0 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENT... 5 2.1 ROADS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL... 5 2.2 TRANSIT... 7 2.3 WALKING AND CYCLING... 7 2.4 TRAFFIC VOLUMES... 8 3.0 FUTURE TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENT... 10 3.1 FUTURE NETWORK UPGRADES... 10 3.1.1 Road Network Improvements... 10 3.2 FUTURE BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENTS... 11 3.3 2017 FUTURE BACKGROUND CONDITIONS... 11 3.4 SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION... 13 3.4.1 Land Use and Trip Generation Rates... 13 3.4.2 Conversion of ITE Rates to Person Trips... 14 3.4.3 Net New Site Trips... 14 3.4.4 Traffic Distribution and Assignment... 14 3.5 2017 TOTAL FUTURE CONDITIONS... 17 3.6 2022 ULTIMATE CONDITIONS... 19 4.0 TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT... 21 4.1 2016 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 21 4.1.1 Intersection Operational Analysis... 21 4.2 2017 FUTURE BACKGROUND CONDITIONS... 23 4.2.1 Intersection Operational Analysis... 23 4.3 2017 TOTAL FUTURE CONDITIONS... 26 4.3.1 Intersection Operational Analysis... 26 4.3.2 Site Access Configuration... 26 4.4 2022 ULTIMATE CONDITIONS... 28 4.4.1 Intersection Operational Analysis... 28 5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS... 30

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 2013 Transportation Master Plan Scheduled Upgrades... 10 Table 2 Trips Generated by the Proposed Residential Development... 13 Table 3 Traffic Distribution to / from the Kanata and Stittsville District... 15 Table 4 2016 Existing Signalized Intersection Operations... 22 Table 5 2017 Future Background Intersection Operations... 24 Table 6 2017 Total Future Intersection Operations... 27 Table 7 2022 Ultimate Intersection Operations... 29 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location... 2 Figure 2 Proposed Site Plan... 3 Figure 3 2016 Existing Intersection Control and Lane Configuration... 6 Figure 4 Study Area Transit... 7 Figure 5 Study Area Cycling Routes and Pathways... 8 Figure 6 2016 Existing Traffic Volumes... 9 Figure 7 2017 Future Background Traffic Volumes... 12 Figure 8 Site Traffic Volumes... 16 Figure 9 2017 Total Future Traffic Volumes... 18 Figure 10 2022 Ultimate Traffic Volumes... 20 Figure 11 2017 Future Background Intersection Control and Lane Configuration... 25 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Traffic Data Intersection Performance Worksheets

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 STUDY PURPOSE Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc. is preparing a site plan control application for a proposed development in the west end of Ottawa, Ontario. As part of the approvals process a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is required to support the application. This TIS has been prepared to assess the potential transportation implications of the proposed development and to determine whether transportation improvements are required to support it. 1.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development is located in the City of Ottawa s Stittsville community and includes a long term care building, a retirement home, and office / retail space. The proposed site is bound by Hazeldean Road to the south, Poole Creek to the north, and undeveloped / vacant land parcels to the east and west. The proposed long term care building will include 256 suites, the retirement home will include 185 suites, the office space component will include 17,000 ft 2 gross floor area (GFA), and the retail space will include 16,000 ft 2 GFA. The final total number of units and GFA, however, may be subject to minor change as the development approvals process proceeds. The site will be accessed by a proposed new private approach (i.e. a new north leg) at the existing Hazeldean Road at Fringewood Drive intersection and via internal connections with the abutting commercial property to the west. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the subject development. Figure 2 depicts the site plan for the proposed development. 1

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 Figure 1 Site Location Site Location 2

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 Figure 2 Proposed Site Plan 3

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 1.3 SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT This TIS has been carried out in accordance with the City of Ottawa s 2006 Transportation Impact Assessment (TIA) Guidelines. The scope of the transportation assessment was discussed with City of Ottawa Development Approvals staff and is outlined as follows: Study area intersections include: o o Hazeldean Road at Huntmar Drive / Iber Road; and Hazeldean Road at Fringewood Drive / Proposed Site Access. Study horizons include: o o o o 2016 existing conditions; 2017 future background conditions; 2017 total future conditions (total site build-out); and 2022 total future conditions (5 years beyond build-out). Analysis time periods include the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The methodology used in the TIS includes: The net increase in site traffic from the proposed development will be estimated; Background traffic growth will be accounted for using an annual growth rate of 2% as well as explicitly accounting for the nearby future Huntington Properties development at 5754 Hazeldean Road and the retail development at 20 Cedarow Court; Future background traffic volumes will be combined with the net increase in site traffic volumes to determine total future traffic volumes; Intersection analyses will be performed to determine the operating characteristics of the study area intersections under each study horizon; and Where operational deficiencies are identified mitigation measures will be examined. 4

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 2.0 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENT 2.1 ROADS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL The roadways under consideration in the study area are described below: Hazeldean Road Huntmar Drive / Iber Road Fringewood Drive In the vicinity of the study area, Hazeldean Road is a fourlane urban arterial road with a 60 km/h posted speed limit. Sidewalks are provided along both side of Hazeldean Road. Huntmar Drive / Iber Road is a major collector road within the study area. South of Hazeldean Road, Iber Road has a two-lane cross-section and a posted speed limit of 60 km/h. North of Hazeldean Road, Huntmar Drive has a fourlane cross-section and a posted speed limit of 50 km/h. The intersection with Hazeldean Road is signalized and exclusive dual left turn lanes are provided in the eastbound and westbound directions. Fringewood Drive is a two-lane local road with a rural crosssection and a posted speed limit of 40 km/h. The intersection with Hazeldean Road is signalized and dedicated turning lanes are provided in the eastbound and westbound directions. The eastbound left and westbound right turn lanes are already in place in order to accommodate the future developments on the north side of Hazeldean Road (the subject development as well as the proposed development at 20 Cedarow Court). The road classifications noted above are referenced from Map 6 of the City of Ottawa s 2013 Transportation Master Plan. Figure 3 illustrates the 2016 existing intersection control and lane configuration for the study area intersections. 5

Site Access Huntmar Drive Hazeldean Road Fringewood Drive Iber Road Legend: Existing Constructed (Unopened) Wellings Communities Holding Inc Figure 3 and Extendicare (Canada) Inc. 2016 Existing Intersection Control 5731 Hazeldean Road and Lane Configuration

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 2.2 TRANSIT Transit service is provided throughout the study area via routes 92, 96, 201, 203, and 263. Route 92 and 96 are regular routes that run from Stittsville to St. Laurent station. Route 201 is a Monday only route that runs from Carlingwood Shopping Centre to the Village of Richmond. Route 203 is a Wednesday only route that runs from Carlingwood Shopping Centre to Dunrobin. Route 261 is a peak hour route that runs from Mackenzie King Station to Stittsville. Route 263 is also a peak hour route that runs from Mackenzie King Station to Stittsville. Figure 4 illustrates the study area transit routes. Figure 4 Study Area Transit Site Location (Source: OC Transpo System Map, accessed January 25 th, 2016) 2.3 WALKING AND CYCLING Within the surrounding community sidewalks are provided along the majority of the roads. Hazeldean Road and Huntmar Drive north of Hazeldean Road both currently have sidewalks along both sides of the road. In terms of cycling facilities, Hazeldean Road and Huntmar Drive north of Hazeldean Road both currently have a bicycle lane while Iber Road south of Hazeldean Road has paved shoulders. As 7

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 outlined in the City s Existing Cycling Network, Fringewood Drive is considered a suggested cycling route. Figure 5 illustrates the study area cycling routes and pathways. Figure 5 Study Area Cycling Routes and Pathways Site Location (Source: City of Ottawa geoottawa, accessed January 25 th, 2016) 2.4 TRAFFIC VOLUMES Traffic counts were provided by the City of Ottawa at the Hazeldean Road at Huntmar Drive / Iber Road intersection. As these traffic counts were collected in 2015, an annual rate of growth of 2% was applied to bring them to 2016 conditions. This background growth rate is consistent with previously completed Transportation Impact Assessments in the area. Traffic counts at the Hazeldean Road at Fringewood Drive intersection were undertaken by Stantec on Tuesday, January 26 th, 2016. Figure 6 illustrates 2016 existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study area intersections. Appendix A contains the traffic data and is provided for reference. 8

AM Peak Hour Site Access Huntmar Drive 569 125 117 107 66 435 46 615 0 0 615 948 0 0 948 185 153 Hazeldean Road 850 35 98 690 55 127 290 14 73 Fringewood Drive Iber Road PM Peak Hour Site Access Huntmar Drive 1283 237 131 134 124 1077 128 1411 0 0 1411 861 0 0 861 183 350 Hazeldean Road 795 44 66 636 97 169 260 46 42 Fringewood Drive Iber Road Wellings Communities Holding Inc Figure 6 and Extendicare (Canada) Inc. 2016 Existing Traffic Volumes 5731 Hazeldean Road

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 3.0 FUTURE TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENT 3.1 FUTURE NETWORK UPGRADES 3.1.1 Road Network Improvements Numerous transportation roadway improvements in the vicinity of the study area have been identified in the City of Ottawa s 2013 Transportation Master Plan (TMP) and are outlined in Table 1 below. Table 1 2013 Transportation Master Plan Scheduled Upgrades Project Description TMP Phase New two-lane road between Fernbank Road and Abbott Street E Phase 1 (2014 2019) Stittsville North-South Arterial New two-lane road between Palladium Drive and Abbott Street E Phase 2 (2020 2025) Transit signal priority and queue jump lanes at select intersections 2031 Affordable Network Huntmar Drive Widen from two to four lanes between Campeau Drive extension to Cyclone Taylor Boulevard. Widen from two to four lanes between Palladium Drive to Maple Grove Road Phase 3 (2026 2031) Phase 3 (2026 2031) Stittsville Main Street Extension New two-lane road between Palladium Drive and Maple Grove Road Phase 3 (2026 2031) Hazeldean Road Transit signal priority and queue jump lanes between Stittsville Main Street and Eagleson Road 2031 Affordable Network Fernbank Road Widen from two to four lanes between Stittsville Main Street and Terry Fox Drive Beyond 2031 Maple Grove Road Widen from two to four lanes between Terry Fox Drive and Huntmar Drive Beyond 2031 Terry Fox Drive Widen from two to four lanes between Winchester Drive and Eagleson Road Widen from four to six lanes between Campeau Drive and Palladium Drive Beyond 2031 Beyond 2031 10

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 None of the improvements outlined above have a direct impact on the study area intersections assessed as part of this study. 3.2 FUTURE BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENTS Huntington Properties - 5754 Hazeldean Road Located on the south eastern quadrant of the Hazeldean Road at Fringewood Drive intersection, this proposed development consists of approximately 76,000 ft 2 of retail space, 59,200 ft 2 of office space, 11,500 ft 2 of pharmacy space, and 5,000 ft 2 of medical uses. The Traffic Impact Study (Delcan 2013) that was completed for this development estimated that it will generate approximately 269 auto trips during the AM peak hour and 447 auto trips during the PM peak hour. As this development is not currently constructed, these trips were added to the roadway network as background trips according to the distribution set forth in the aforementioned 2013 TIS. 20 Cedarow Road Located on the north western quadrant of the Hazeldean Road at Fringewood Drive intersection, this proposed development consists of approximately 61,000 ft 2 of retail space. The Traffic Impact Study (Novatech 2009) that was completed for this development estimated that it will generate 327 auto trips during the PM peak hour and 373 auto trips during the Saturday peak hour. Through discussions with City of Ottawa staff, it is noted that this development is expected to be built by 2017, and as such, these trips were added to the roadway network as background trips according to the distribution set forth in the aforementioned 2009 TIS. The 20 Cedarow Road development will share the proposed new north leg of the Hazeldean Road at Fringewood Drive intersection with the subject development. 3.3 2017 FUTURE BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Future background conditions are assessed to determine transportation improvements that may be required to address traffic growth exclusive from improvements that may be required to accommodate traffic generated by the subject development. Any improvements identified to address future background conditions are not attributed to the subject development. To account for future background growth an annual growth rate of 2% was applied to all movements at the study area intersections. This growth rate is consistent with previously completed traffic studies in the area. In addition to the growth rate, the traffic generated by the two future developments were added to the roadway network, as outlined in Section 3.2. Figure 7 illustrates 2017 future background traffic volumes at the study area intersections. An assessment of 2017 future background traffic conditions is outlined in Section 4.2. 11

AM Peak Hour Site Access Huntmar Drive 0 67 0 0 0 578 135 202 109 464 80 658 0 0 658 991 0 0 1001 200 185 Hazeldean Road 881 58 0 110 727 59 153 303 28 74 Fringewood Drive Iber Road PM Peak Hour Site Access Huntmar Drive 70 126 19 5 84 1322 262 179 136 1182 64 189 1581 0 0 1581 985 0 0 1042 223 373 Hazeldean Road 813 97 6 88 753 137 262 285 71 66 Fringewood Drive Iber Road Wellings Communities Holding Inc Figure 7 and Extendicare (Canada) Inc. 2017 Future Background Traffic 5731 Hazeldean Road Volumes

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 3.4 SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION 3.4.1 Land Use and Trip Generation Rates The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (9 th Edition) was used to estimate traffic generated by the subject site. The ITE land use codes that were used are 254 Assisted Living, 253 Congregate Care Facility, 826 Specialty Retail Center, and 710 General Office Building. Table 2 summarizes the average trip rates obtained from the ITE Trip Generation Manual and the ensuing sections describe the methodology used to convert these trips to person trips across all modes. Table 2 Trips Generated by the Proposed Residential Development Step 1: ITE Trip Generation Rates 1000 s GFA / # Units Morning Peak Hour Afternoon Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total 254 Assisted Living 256 65% 35% 0.14 44% 56% 0.22 253 Congregate Care Facility 185 59% 41% 0.06 55% 45% 0.17 826 Specialty Retail Center 17 N/A N/A N/A 44% 56% 2.71 710 General Office Building 16 88% 12% 1.56 17% 83% 1.49 Step 2: Auto Trips Generated 254 Assisted Living 256 23 13 36 25 31 56 252 Senior Adult Housing 185 6 5 11 17 14 31 820 Shopping Centre 17 0 0 0 20 26 46 710 General Office Building 16 22 3 25 4 20 24 Step 3: Conversion From Auto Trips to Person Trips Trip Gen (ITE) 51 21 72 66 91 157 Total Development Transit Share 10% 5 2 7 6 9 15 Auto Occupancy 1.1 5 2 7 6 9 15 Step 4: Person Trips by Modal Share Total Person Trips 61 25 86 78 109 187 Total Development Auto 60% 37 15 52 46 65 111 Passenger 10% 6 3 9 7 11 18 Transit 25% 15 6 21 20 27 47 Walk / Bike Neg. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other 5% 3 1 4 5 6 11 13

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 3.4.2 Conversion of ITE Rates to Person Trips The notion of quantifying the volume of person trips expected to be generated by a given development is becoming a commonly accepted practice. It is aimed at quantifying the expected demands across the primary modes of transportation. In order to convert ITE rates to person trips, the rates obtained from the ITE Trip Generation Manual were adjusted to account for an inherent transit modal share and auto occupancy. An assumed transit share of 10% was thought to be inherent within the ITE rates and an auto occupancy rate of 1.1 persons per vehicle was also assumed to be inherent within the ITE rates. Step 3 of Table 2 outlines the conversion from auto trips to person trips. 3.4.3 Net New Site Trips The person trips were then assigned to the four primary modal shares (i.e. auto, passenger, transit, and active modes) according to local modal share characteristics as documented in the TRANS Committee s 2011 Origin-Destination (O-D) Survey for the Kanata / Stittsville District. The proposed development is anticipated to generate approximately 86 person trips during the AM peak hour and 187 person trips during the PM peak hour. In terms of vehicle trips, the proposed development is anticipated to generate 52 net new auto trips (two-way) during the AM peak hour and 111 net new auto trips (two-way) during the PM peak hour. Step 4 of Table 2 summarizes the expected person trips by modal share. 3.4.4 Traffic Distribution and Assignment The distribution of traffic to / from the study area was determined through examination of the existing volumes at the study area intersections, previously completed Transportation Impact Assessments within the study area, as well as our knowledge of the surrounding environment. Two distributions were used; one for the retail component and one for the office component. As the majority of the cars generated by the assisted living and congregate care facilities during the roadway peak hours are attributed to staff, these two land uses closely reflect the traffic patterns exhibited by office land uses, and thus were distributed according to the office distribution. Table 3 provides a summary of the estimated distribution of traffic generated by the proposed development. The anticipated site traffic generated by the proposed development was assigned to the boundary road network using a logical pattern of primary roads (i.e. along arterials and collectors). Figure 8 illustrates the anticipated site traffic generated by the proposed development. 14

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 Table 3 Traffic Distribution to / from the Kanata and Stittsville District Cardinal Direction Retail Office North 20% 70% East 40% 20% South Neg. Neg. West 40% 10% Total 100% 100% 15

AM Peak Hour Site Access in 37 out 15 Huntmar Drive 33 2 13 13 20 4 33 0 0 33 13 0 0 13 5 Hazeldean Road 8 Fringewood Drive Iber Road PM Peak Hour Site Access in 46 out 65 Huntmar Drive 37 13 52 12 25 9 37 0 0 37 52 0 0 52 18 Hazeldean Road 34 Fringewood Drive Iber Road Wellings Communities Holding Inc Figure 8 and Extendicare (Canada) Inc. Site Traffic Volumes 5731 Hazeldean Road

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 3.5 2017 TOTAL FUTURE CONDITIONS Total future conditions are examined to determine improvements that may be required as a direct result of the development of the site. It is anticipated that by 2017 the development will be fully built and occupied. The 2017 total future traffic volumes were derived by adding the projected site generated trips to future background volumes anticipated for 2017. Figure 9 illustrates 2017 total future traffic volumes at the study area intersections during the AM and PM peak hours. An assessment of 2017 total future traffic conditions is outlined in Section 4.3. 17

AM Peak Hour Site Access Huntmar Drive 33 67 2 0 13 578 148 202 109 484 4 80 691 0 0 691 1004 0 0 1014 205 185 Hazeldean Road 881 58 0 110 735 59 153 303 28 74 Fringewood Drive Iber Road PM Peak Hour Site Access Huntmar Drive 107 126 32 5 136 1322 274 179 136 1207 73 189 1618 0 0 1618 1037 0 0 1094 241 373 Hazeldean Road 813 97 6 88 787 137 262 285 71 66 Fringewood Drive Iber Road Wellings Communities Holding Inc Figure 9 and Extendicare (Canada) Inc. 2017 Total Future Traffic 5731 Hazeldean Road Volumes

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 3.6 2022 ULTIMATE CONDITIONS Ultimate conditions for the 2022 horizon were examined to determine if other improvements may be required due to further growth in background traffic volumes 5 years beyond the development of the subject site. The 2022 ultimate traffic volumes were derived by adding five years of background growth to the 2017 total future traffic volumes using the background growth rate assumptions outlined in Section 3.3. Figure 10 illustrates 2022 ultimate traffic volume at the study area intersections during the AM and PM peak hours. An assessment of 2022 ultimate traffic conditions is outlined in Section 4.4. 19

AM Peak Hour Site Access Huntmar Drive 33 74 2 0 13 634 160 214 120 527 4 85 752 0 0 752 1099 0 0 1109 223 200 Hazeldean Road 966 61 0 120 804 65 165 332 30 82 Fringewood Drive Iber Road PM Peak Hour Site Access Huntmar Drive 107 139 32 5 136 1450 298 192 149 1313 73 201 1758 0 0 1758 1121 0 0 1178 258 408 Hazeldean Road 890 101 6 95 850 147 279 311 71 70 Fringewood Drive Iber Road Wellings Communities Holding Inc Figure 10 and Extendicare (Canada) Inc. 2022 Ultimate Traffic Volumes 5731 Hazeldean Road

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 4.0 TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT 4.1 2016 EXISTING CONDITIONS Figure 3 (Section 2.1) illustrates the 2016 existing intersection controls and lane configuration at the study area intersections. 4.1.1 Intersection Operational Analysis An assessment of the study area intersections was undertaken to determine their operational characteristics. Intersection operations were analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 edition (HCM 2000) methodologies and facilitated with Synchro 9.0 TM software. Table 4 provides a summary of 2016 existing intersection operations. Using the City s existing signal timing plans, both signalized intersections operate acceptably; therefore, no improvements are required to supplement existing conditions. Appendix B contains detailed intersection performance worksheets. 21

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 Table 4 2016 Existing Signalized Intersection Operations Signalized Intersections Hazeldean Road at Huntmar Drive / Iber Road Hazeldean Road at Fringewood Drive Approach/Movement EB WB NB SB 2016 Existing Conditions LOS V/C 2 Q 3 (m) Left A (A) 0.39 (0.58) 12.5 (24.8) Through / Right A (A) 0.43 (0.52) 66.4 (100.1) Left A (C) 0.51 (0.71) 27.4 (57.9) Through A (C) 0.30 (0.71) 52.9 (#164.6) Right A (A) 0.05 (0.09) 0.0 (9.8) Left A (A) 0.34 (0.44) 22.5 (31.8) Through A (B) 0.52 (0.68) 43.1 (60.5) Right A (A) 0.28 (0.19) 27.0 (22.6) Left B (C) 0.70 (0.72) 39.8 (42.9) Through A (A) 0.48 (0.52) 40.1 (47.7) Right A (A) 0.09 (0.17) 10.0 (21.5) Overall Intersection A (C) 0.53 (0.74) - EB Through / Right A (A) 0.39 (0.38) 57.6 (62.4) WB NB Left A (A) 0.12 (0.29) 1.5 (m5.2) Through A (A) 0.23 (0.50) 6.1 (23.0) Left A (A) 0.31 (0.44) 17.7 (22.6) Right A (A) 0.07 (0.05) 15.9 (13.7) Overall Intersection A (A) 0.39 (0.52) - 1. Table Format: AM (PM) 2. v/c represents the anticipated volume divided by the predicted capacity 3. 95 th Percentile Queue (m) 4. # - 95 th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer 5. m - Volume for 95 th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal 22

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 4.2 2017 FUTURE BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Future background conditions for the 2017 horizon were assessed to determine transportation improvements that may be required to address growth in traffic exclusive from improvements that may be required to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed development. The background development assumptions outlined in Section 3.3 were applied to existing traffic volumes to predict 2017 future background traffic volumes. Figure 11 illustrates the 2017 future background intersection control and lane configuration for the study area intersections. 4.2.1 Intersection Operational Analysis Table 5 summarizes the operational characteristics of the study area intersections under 2017 future background conditions. Network offsets and cycle lengths were optimized for the 2017 future background condition. Both study area intersections are expected to operate acceptably, and as such, no improvements are required to accommodate the projected 2017 future background traffic volumes. Appendix B contains detailed intersection performance worksheets. 23

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 Table 5 2017 Future Background Intersection Operations Signalized Intersections Hazeldean Road at Huntmar Drive / Iber Road Hazeldean Road at Fringewood Drive Approach/Movement EB WB NB SB 2017 Future Background LOS V/C Q 2 (m) Left A (B) 0.35 (0.62) 18.8 (45.6) Through / Right A (B) 0.48 (0.61) 31.4 (142.5) Left A (C) 0.50 (0.77) 28.2 (#73.9) Through A (C) 0.37 (0.80) 57.6 (#233.6) Right A (A) 0.04 (0.08) 0.0 (12.4) Left A (A) 0.36 (0.53) 21.2 (42.2) Through A (C) 0.49 (0.75) 43.4 (91.9) Right A (A) 0.20 (0.19) 28.9 (32.1) Left A (C) 0.53 (0.71) 34.8 (#43.8) Through B (A) 0.64 (0.51) 56.4 (62.2) Right A (A) 0.09 (0.17) 7.5 (30.2) Overall Intersection A (D) 0.57 (0.81) - EB WB NB SB Left A (A) 0.00 (0.27) 0.0 (21.3) Through / Right A (A) 0.39 (0.41) 72.2 (90.6) Left A (A) 0.18 (0.40) 8.1 (m42.8) Through A (A) 0.21 (0.50) 24.6 (208.8) Right A (A) 0.00 (0.05) 0.0 (m9.0) Left A (B) 0.46 (0.63) 27.2 (42.8) Through / Right A (A) 0.07 (0.09) 0.0 (19.6) Left A (A) 0.00 (0.60) 0.0 (38.4) Through / Right A (A) 0.00 (0.04) 0.0 (10.1) Overall Intersection A (A) 0.40 (0.55) - 1. Table Format: AM (PM) 2. v/c represents the anticipated volume divided by the predicted capacity 3. 95 th Percentile Queue (m) 4. # - 95 th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer 5. m - Volume for 95 th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal 24

Site Access Huntmar Drive Hazeldean Road Fringewood Drive Iber Road Wellings Communities Holding Inc Figure 11 and Extendicare (Canada) Inc. 2017 Future Background Intersection 5731 Hazeldean Road Control and Lane Configuration

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 4.3 2017 TOTAL FUTURE CONDITIONS Total future conditions are assessed to determine transportation improvements that may be required to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed development. The site trip generation, distribution, and assignment assumptions outlined in Section 3.4 were applied to 2017 future background traffic volumes to predict 2017 total future traffic volumes. 4.3.1 Intersection Operational Analysis Table 6 summarizes the operational characteristics of the study area intersections under 2017 total future conditions. Network offsets and cycle lengths were optimized for the 2017 total future condition. Both study area intersections are expected to operate acceptably, and as such, no improvements are required to accommodate the projected 2017 total future traffic volumes. Appendix B contains detailed intersection performance worksheets. 4.3.2 Site Access Configuration The recommended lane configuration for the southbound approach to the Hazeldean Road at Fringewood Drive / Site Access intersection includes a three-lane cross-section featuring one inbound lane and two outbound lanes. The two outbound lanes include an exclusive left turn lane and a shared through/right turn lane. The southbound left turn queues (95 th percentile queues) at the site access are anticipated to extend to approximately 60m during the PM peak hour. With the proposed internal access to the subject lands located roughly 68m north of Hazeldean Road, the projected storage demands are not expected to block the internal access. As the southbound approach to this intersection will be a private approach, the taper length of the southbound left turn lane can be reduced from typical standards that would normally be applied to municipal roads. A taper length of 20 to 30 metres would likely be sufficient and this can be confirmed during design. 26

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 Table 6 2017 Total Future Intersection Operations Signalized Intersections Hazeldean Road at Huntmar Drive / Iber Road Hazeldean Road at Fringewood Drive / Site Access Approach/Movement EB WB NB SB 2017 Future Background LOS V/C Q 2 (m) Left A (B) 0.36 (0.65) 24.0 (46.7) Through / Right A (B) 0.49 (0.63) 62.6 (#150.1) Left A (C) 0.50 (0.77) 28.2 (#74.4) Through A (D) 0.39 (0.82) 59.7 (#240.8) Right A (A) 0.04 (0.08) 0.0 (12.4) Left A (A) 0.36 (0.53) 21.2 (42.2) Through A (C) 0.49 (0.75) 43.4 (91.9) Right A (A) 0.20 (0.19) 28.9 (32.1) Left A (C) 0.53 (0.71) 34.8 (#43.8) Through B (A) 0.64 (0.51) 56.4 (62.2) Right A (A) 0.10 (0.17) 10.2 (29.3) Overall Intersection A (D) 0.57 (0.82) - EB WB NB SB Left A (A) 0.01 (0.33) 1.9 (28.1) Through / Right A (A) 0.42 (0.43) 71.7 (102.1) Left A (A) 0.19 (0.44) 4.6 (m4.5) Through A (A) 0.22 (0.53) 4.8 (m180.1) Right A (A) 0.02 (0.07) m0.2 (m0.0) Left A (A) 0.46 (0.48) 22.7 (40.2) Through / Right A (A) 0.11 (0.08) 18.9 (18.4) Left A (C) 0.13 (0.72) 8.1 (55.5) Through / Right A (A) 0.04 (0.04) 5.1 (11.6) Overall Intersection A (A) 0.43 (0.60) - 1. Table Format: AM (PM) 2. v/c represents the anticipated volume divided by the predicted capacity 3. 95 th Percentile Queue (m) 4. # - 95 th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer 5. m - Volume for 95 th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal 27

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 4.4 2022 ULTIMATE CONDITIONS Ultimate future conditions for the 2022 horizon were examined to determine if other improvements may be required due to growth in background traffic volumes 5 years beyond the anticipated build-out horizon of the site. The difference between 2022 ultimate conditions and 2017 total future conditions is 5 years of additional background growth consistent with the growth assumptions outlined in Section 3.3. As such, any improvements required to accommodate 2022 ultimate conditions are not attributed to the subject development. 4.4.1 Intersection Operational Analysis Table 7 summarizes the operational characteristics of the study area intersections under 2022 ultimate conditions. Network offsets and cycle lengths were optimized for the 2022 ultimate condition. Both study area intersections are expected to operate acceptably, and as such, no improvements are required to accommodate the projected 2022 ultimate traffic volumes. Appendix B contains detailed intersection operation summaries. 28

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 Table 7 2022 Ultimate Intersection Operations Signalized Intersections Hazeldean Road at Huntmar Drive / Iber Road Hazeldean Road at Fringewood Drive / Site Access Approach/Movement EB WB NB SB 2017 Future Background LOS V/C Q 2 (m) Left A (B) 0.39 (0.67) 22.8 (49.8) Through / Right A (C) 0.54 (0.71) 36.6 (#169.4) Left A (C) 0.54 (0.79) 30.9 (#87.7) Through A (E) 0.44 (0.91) 64.4 (#271.5) Right A (A) 0.05 (0.09) 0.0 (15.5) Left A (A) 0.39 (0.57) 22.9 (44.8) Through A (C) 0.50 (0.77) 46.0 (97.8) Right A (A) 0.29 (0.21) 36.3 (34.2) Left A (C) 0.59 (0.79) 38.0 (#54.7) Through B (A) 0.65 (0.53) 58.9 (66.8) Right A (A) 0.11 (0.17) 12.6 (29.2) Overall Intersection B (D) 0.62 (0.89) - EB WB NB SB Left A (A) 0.01 (0.38) 1.9 (31.5) Through / Right A (A) 0.47 (0.48) 82.5 (116.0) Left A (A) 0.22 (0.49) 6.5 (m6.4) Through A (A) 0.25 (0.58) 11.2 (m183.1) Right A (A) 0.02 (0.07) m0.8 (m0.0) Left A (A) 0.42 (0.51) 23.6 (41.7) Through / Right A (A) 0.11 (0.09) 19.5 (19.2) Left A (C) 0.12 (0.72) 8.0 (55.5) Through / Right A (A) 0.03 (0.04) 5.1 (11.6) Overall Intersection A (B) 0.47 (0.64) - 1. Table Format: AM (PM) 2. v/c represents the anticipated volume divided by the predicted capacity 3. 95 th Percentile Queue (m) 4. # - 95 th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer 5. m - Volume for 95 th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal 29

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Proposed Development The proposed development is located in the City of Ottawa s Stittsville community and includes a long term care building, a retirement home, and office / retail space. The proposed site is bound by Hazeldean Road to the south, Poole Creek to the north, and greenspace to the east and west. The proposed long term care building will include 256 suites, the retirement home will include 185 suites, the office space will include 17,000 gross floor area (GFA), and the retail space will include 16,000 GFA. The final total number of units and GFA, however, may be subject to minor change as the development approvals process proceeds. The proposed development is anticipated to generate approximately 86 person trips during the AM peak hour and 187 person trips during the PM peak hour. In terms of vehicle trips, the proposed residential development is anticipated to generate 52 net new auto trips (two-way) during the AM peak hour and 111 net new auto trips (two-way) during the PM peak hour. 2016 Existing Conditions Operationally, both study area intersections operate satisfactorily, and as such, no improvements are required to supplement existing conditions. 2017 Future Background Conditions Operationally, both study area intersections are expected to operate satisfactorily under 2017 future background conditions. No improvements are required to accommodate the projected 2017 future background traffic volumes. 2017 Total Future Conditions Operationally, both study area intersections are expected to operate satisfactorily under 2017 total future conditions. No improvements are required to accommodate the projected 2017 total future traffic volumes. The recommended lane configuration for the southbound approach to the Hazeldean Road at Fringewood Drive / Site Access intersections includes a three-lane cross-section featuring one inbound lane and two outbound lanes. The two outbound lanes include an exclusive left turn lane and a shared through/right turn lane. 30

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 The southbound left turn queues (95 th percentile queues) at the site access are anticipated to extend to approximately 60m during the PM peak hour. With the proposed internal access to the subject lands located roughly 68m north of Hazeldean Road, the projected storage demands are not expected to block the internal access. As the southbound approach to this intersection will be a private approach, the taper length of the southbound left turn lane can be reduced from typical standards that would normally be applied to municipal roads. A taper length of 20 to 30 metres would likely be sufficient and this can be confirmed during design. 2022 Ultimate Conditions Operationally, both study area intersections are expected to operate satisfactorily under 2022 ultimate conditions. No improvements are required to accommodate the projected 2022 ultimate traffic volumes. Based on the transportation evaluation and the negligible impacts that have been identified in this Transportation Impact Assessment, Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc. s proposed 5731 Hazeldean Road development should be permitted to proceed from a transportation perspective. STANTEC CONSULTING LTD. ***** Robert Vastag, RPP Project Manager, Senior Transportation Planner Lauren O Grady, B.A.Sc. Transportation Engineering Intern 31

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 Appendix A Traffic Data

Public Works - Traffic Services Turning Movement Count - Full Study Peak Hour Diagram HAZELDEAN RD @ IBER RD Survey Date: Start Time: Thursday, July 23, 2015 WO No: 34999 07:00 Device: Jamar Technologies, Inc IBER RD N W E Total Heavy Vehicles Cars 122 5 117 340 114 4 110 104 1 103 709 0 0 0 369 9 360 7 3 0 S 3 HAZELDEAN RD 59 5 64 601 34 567 409 17 426 640 1528 0 181 0 4 0 AM Period 143 7 150 Peak Hour: 177 1703 08:30 09:30 0 0 0 927 675 71 21 12 654 59 1031 32 1063 2 4 3 312 23 0 0 0 41 124 274 12 0 10 53 124 284 Cars Heavy Vehicles Total 335 461 796 2 Comments 2016-Jan-25 Page 1 of 3

Public Works - Traffic Services Turning Movement Count - Full Study Peak Hour Diagram HAZELDEAN RD @ IBER RD Survey Date: Start Time: Thursday, July 23, 2015 WO No: 34999 07:00 Device: Jamar Technologies, Inc IBER RD N W E Total Heavy Vehicles Cars 217 3 214 437 95 4 91 125 6 119 786 0 0 0 349 7 342 3 0 5 S 0 HAZELDEAN RD 88 3 91 896 32 864 601 19 620 881 1813 0 164 0 2 0 MD Period 156 12 168 Peak Hour: 162 1950 11:30 12:30 2 0 2 917 693 60 20 17 673 43 1030 39 1069 2 2 3 290 33 0 0 0 49 92 236 10 2 13 59 94 249 Cars Heavy Vehicles Total 323 402 725 1 Comments 2016-Jan-25 Page 2 of 3

Public Works - Traffic Services Turning Movement Count - Full Study Peak Hour Diagram HAZELDEAN RD @ IBER RD Survey Date: Start Time: Thursday, July 23, 2015 WO No: 34999 07:00 Device: Jamar Technologies, Inc IBER RD N W E Total Heavy Vehicles Cars 232 5 227 491 128 1 127 131 0 131 956 0 0 0 465 6 459 7 3 5 S 13 HAZELDEAN RD 121 0 121 1382 32 1350 1035 20 1055 1520 2224 0 179 0 2 0 PM Period 326 17 343 Peak Hour: 177 2528 16:00 17:00 1 0 1 842 622 41 8 9 614 32 994 14 1008 3 2 5 485 27 0 0 0 88 161 248 7 4 6 95 165 254 Cars Heavy Vehicles Total 512 514 1026 5 Comments 2016-Jan-25 Page 3 of 3

Stantec counts taken on January 26 2016 Hazeldean at Fringewood NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 8:15 8:30 12 0 24 0 0 0 0 175 5 17 78 0 8:30 8:45 10 0 35 0 0 0 0 203 3 9 135 0 8:45 9:00 15 0 20 0 0 0 0 215 5 11 152 0 9:00 9:15 4 0 21 0 0 0 0 201 4 9 125 0 9:15 9:30 6 0 16 0 0 0 0 181 2 12 103 0 9:30 9:45 6 0 17 0 0 0 0 151 6 9 116 0 AM Peak Hour 35 0 92 0 0 0 0 800 14 41 515 0 3:45 4:00 9 0 13 0 0 0 0 145 9 16 244 0 4:00 4:15 11 0 15 0 0 0 0 188 6 26 269 0 4:15 4:30 15 0 7 0 0 0 0 168 11 21 285 0 4:30 4:45 11 0 20 0 0 0 0 198 17 38 291 0 4:45 5:00 7 0 16 0 0 0 0 154 12 28 288 0 5:00 5:15 11 0 13 0 0 0 0 193 9 29 255 0 PM Peak Hour 44 0 58 0 0 0 0 708 46 113 1133 0

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 Appendix B Intersection Performance Worksheets

WELLINGS COMMUNITIES HOLDING INC AND EXTENDICARE (CANADA) INC. 5731 HAZELDEAN ROAD TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY MARCH 2016 B.1 2016 EXISTING CONDITIONS

Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5731 Hazeldean Road 1: Iber Road/Huntmar Drive & Hazeldean Road 2016 Existing AM Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 185 690 73 153 435 66 55 127 290 107 117 125 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Storage Length (m) 60.0 0.0 100.0 240.0 65.0 65.0 85.0 0.0 Storage Lanes 2 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (m) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.986 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3288 3343 0 3288 3390 1517 1695 1784 1517 1695 1784 1517 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.655 0.621 Satd. Flow (perm) 3288 3343 0 3288 3390 1517 1169 1784 1517 1108 1784 1517 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 12 164 297 164 Link Speed (k/h) 60 60 60 50 Link Distance (m) 258.1 353.3 178.1 183.3 Travel Time (s) 15.5 21.2 10.7 13.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 201 750 79 166 473 72 60 138 315 116 127 136 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 829 0 166 473 72 60 138 315 116 127 136 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(m) 7.4 7.4 3.7 3.7 Link Offset(m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Crosswalk Width(m) 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 Turning Speed (k/h) 24 14 24 14 24 14 24 14 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (m) 6.1 30.5 6.1 30.5 6.1 6.1 30.5 6.1 6.1 30.5 6.1 Trailing Detector (m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Position(m) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Size(m) 6.1 1.8 6.1 1.8 6.1 6.1 1.8 6.1 6.1 1.8 6.1 Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(m) 28.7 28.7 28.7 28.7 Detector 2 Size(m) 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 5 13 2 1 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 4 8 8 Detector Phase 513 2 1 6 6 4 4 4 8 8 8 Stantec Consulting Ltd. Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5731 Hazeldean Road 1: Iber Road/Huntmar Drive & Hazeldean Road 2016 Existing AM Lane Group ø5 ø13 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (m) Storage Lanes Taper Length (m) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (k/h) Link Distance (m) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(m) Link Offset(m) Crosswalk Width(m) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (k/h) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (m) Trailing Detector (m) Detector 1 Position(m) Detector 1 Size(m) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(m) Detector 2 Size(m) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases 5 13 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Stantec Consulting Ltd. Page 2

Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5731 Hazeldean Road 1: Iber Road/Huntmar Drive & Hazeldean Road 2016 Existing AM Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.6 11.3 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 Total Split (s) 50.0 16.0 38.0 38.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 Total Split (%) 45.5% 14.5% 34.5% 34.5% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 43.4 9.7 31.4 31.4 37.4 37.4 37.4 37.4 37.4 37.4 Yellow Time (s) 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 All-Red Time (s) 2.9 2.6 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.6 6.3 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Min None C-Min C-Min None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 16.8 63.2 10.9 51.0 51.0 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 Actuated g/c Ratio 0.15 0.57 0.10 0.46 0.46 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.43 0.51 0.30 0.09 0.34 0.52 0.66 0.70 0.48 0.37 Control Delay 19.2 13.3 52.3 20.6 0.2 45.1 48.7 12.7 65.3 47.3 6.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.2 13.3 52.3 20.6 0.2 45.1 48.7 12.7 65.3 47.3 6.2 LOS B B D C A D D B E D A Approach Delay 14.4 26.0 26.2 38.1 Approach LOS B C C D Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 33 (30%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.70 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: Iber Road/Huntmar Drive & Hazeldean Road Stantec Consulting Ltd. Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5731 Hazeldean Road 1: Iber Road/Huntmar Drive & Hazeldean Road 2016 Existing AM Lane Group ø5 ø13 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.3 11.0 Total Split (s) 16.0 12.0 Total Split (%) 15% 11% Maximum Green (s) 9.7 6.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.7 4.0 All-Red Time (s) 2.6 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Stantec Consulting Ltd. Page 4

Queues 5731 Hazeldean Road 1: Iber Road/Huntmar Drive & Hazeldean Road 2016 Existing AM Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 829 166 473 72 60 138 315 116 127 136 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.43 0.51 0.30 0.09 0.34 0.52 0.66 0.70 0.48 0.37 Control Delay 19.2 13.3 52.3 20.6 0.2 45.1 48.7 12.7 65.3 47.3 6.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.2 13.3 52.3 20.6 0.2 45.1 48.7 12.7 65.3 47.3 6.2 Queue Length 50th (m) 13.9 40.4 17.7 32.1 0.0 11.7 27.7 3.4 24.0 25.4 0.0 Queue Length 95th (m) 10.5 55.5 27.4 52.9 0.0 22.5 43.1 27.0 39.8 40.1 10.0 Internal Link Dist (m) 234.1 329.3 154.1 159.3 Turn Bay Length (m) 60.0 100.0 240.0 65.0 65.0 85.0 Base Capacity (vph) 565 1925 336 1571 791 397 606 711 376 606 624 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.43 0.49 0.30 0.09 0.15 0.23 0.44 0.31 0.21 0.22 Stantec Consulting Ltd. Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5731 Hazeldean Road 1: Iber Road/Huntmar Drive & Hazeldean Road 2016 Existing AM Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 185 690 73 153 435 66 55 127 290 107 117 125 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Total Lost time (s) 6.3 6.6 6.3 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3288 3342 3288 3390 1517 1695 1784 1517 1695 1784 1517 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.65 1.00 1.00 0.62 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3288 3342 3288 3390 1517 1168 1784 1517 1108 1784 1517 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 201 750 79 166 473 72 60 138 315 116 127 136 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 0 39 0 0 253 0 0 116 Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 824 0 166 473 33 60 138 62 116 127 20 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 5 13 2 1 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.1 63.2 10.9 51.0 51.0 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 Effective Green, g (s) 17.1 63.2 10.9 51.0 51.0 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 Actuated g/c Ratio 0.16 0.57 0.10 0.46 0.46 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.3 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 511 1920 325 1571 703 174 265 226 165 265 226 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.25 c0.05 c0.14 0.08 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.05 0.04 c0.10 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.43 0.51 0.30 0.05 0.34 0.52 0.28 0.70 0.48 0.09 Uniform Delay, d1 41.8 13.2 47.0 18.4 16.2 42.0 43.2 41.5 44.5 42.9 40.4 Progression Factor 0.72 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.7 1.4 0.5 0.1 1.2 1.8 0.7 12.7 1.4 0.2 Delay (s) 30.7 12.2 48.4 18.9 16.3 43.2 45.0 42.2 57.2 44.3 40.5 Level of Service C B D B B D D D E D D Approach Delay (s) 15.8 25.5 43.1 46.9 Approach LOS B C D D HCM 2000 Control Delay 28.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Stantec Consulting Ltd. Page 6