Drilling Productivity Report

Similar documents
ENERGY SLIDESHOW. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

ENERGY SLIDESHOW. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

U.S. Rail Crude Oil Traffic

U.S. Rail Crude Oil Traffic

TANK BARGE OPPORTUNITIES RELATED TO CRUDE OIL PRODUCTION & MOVEMENT

For Region 5 and Region 7 Regional Response Teams Meeting April 22, 2015 St. Charles, Missouri via video/teleconference

RESEARCH & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT. Oil & Gas Updates: US Shale Industry

Implications of the U.S. Shale Revolution

Sales of Fossil Fuels Produced from Federal and Indian Lands, FY 2003 through FY 2013

May 2018 Short-Term Energy Outlook

What is the Future of Competitive Markets? Some Fundamental Preliminaries and View from Events in the PJM Market

A summary of national and global energy indicators. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of KANSAS CITY

B A K E R & O B R I E N

Moving Crude Oil by Rail

North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources. 600 East Boulevard Ave. - Dept 405 Bismarck, ND (701) (701)

Tight Oil: A Solution to U.S. Import Dependence?

Presentation to House Appropriations Subcommittee Committee on Budget Transparency and Reform

PHOTOS: SHUTTERSTOCK. June Editor s note: The Arkansas Energy Report is Sponsored by MISO & Arkansas State Chamber of Commerce.

TRAFFIC VOLUME TRENDS

US Shale Liquids Surge: Implications for the Crude Oil Value Chain

Energy Outlook. U.S. Energy Information Administration. For EnerCom Dallas February 22, 2018 Dallas, TX

Rice Global E&C Forum August 9, 2013

TRAFFIC VOLUME TRENDS July 2002

RETURN ON INVESTMENT LIQUIFIED NATURAL GAS PIVOTAL LNG TRUCK MARKET LNG TO DIESEL COMPARISON

Thursday, March 6, 2014 Houston, TX. 8:30 9:40 a.m. AN ECONOMIST S-EYE VIEW OF THE ENERGY INDUSTRY: HYDROCARBON HAT TRICK

Bakken Well Economics & Production Forecasting

Sasha Weintraub Duke Energy

Section 5. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Resource Development

U.S. GASOLINE AND DISTILLATE FUELS UPDATE - DECEMBER 20, 2017

Fuel Focus. Understanding Gasoline Markets in Canada and Economic Drivers Influencing Prices. Issue 20, Volume 8

Adam Bedard, CEO ARB Midstream, LLC Midstream View on Rail. June 2, 2015

U.S. Ethanol Production, Imports and Stocks

Monthly Biodiesel Production Report

05/17/2011

Update from U.S. - Shale 2.0. Chris Faulkner CEO, Breitling Oil and Gas Shale Gas World Europe 2013 Warsaw, Poland

Energy, Economic. Environmental Indicators

Tracking New Coal-Fired Power Plants. Coal s Resurgence in Electric Power Generation

MODELING FRESH WATER CONSUMPTION ASSOCIATED WITH PRIMARY ENERGY PRODUCTION IN THE USA

Texas Oil and Gas Emissions Inventory Improvement Projects

Defining the Debate: Crude Oil Exports

ANNUAL FINANCIAL PROFILE OF AMERICA S FRANCHISED NEW-TRUCK DEALERSHIPS

Fuel Focus. Understanding Gasoline Markets in Canada and Economic Drivers Influencing Prices. Volume 6, Issue 23

Asphaltene Precipitation in Domestic Sweet. Ron Fisher BP, Refining and Logistics Technology June 11, 2015

Developing a Fuel-Based Inventory of Oil and Gas Emissions

Trond-Erik Johansen President ConocoPhillips Alaska

Refinery Outages: First Half 2015

Why U.S. Natural Gas Prices Should Double

MMWR 1 Expanded Table 1. Persons living with diagnosed. Persons living with undiagnosed HIV infection

Caltex Australia comments on Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme White Paper February 2009

January 2018 Monthly Update North Dakota Pipeline Authority Justin J. Kringstad January 16, 2018

November. Next release: 19 January Sep/AugOct/Sep Nov/Oct Dec 14 December Janu 19 January 2018 Sep/AugOct/Sep Nov/Oct 2017

State of the Steel Industry and the effect on the outlook for the Tube and Pipe Markets

ND Pipeline Authority Web Presentation

ALG July/August 2011 Edition Report

Emerging Trends in Petroleum Markets

PHOTOS: SHUTTERSTOCK. July Editor s note: The Arkansas Energy Report is Sponsored by MISO & Arkansas State Chamber of Commerce.

U.S. Total Crude Oil Supply and Demand

Refinery Outages: Fourth-Quarter 2015

Fuel Focus. Understanding Gasoline Markets in Canada and Economic Drivers Influencing Prices. Volume 7, Issue 14

Characteristics of Minimum Wage Workers: Bureau of Labor Statistics U.S. Department of Labor

U.S. Natural Gas Outlook The 3rd London Gas & LNG Forum September 26 and 27, 2016 The Rag Army & Navy Club London

WRAP Oil & Gas: Part 1: 2002/2005 and 2018 Area Source Emissions Inventory Improvements

December. Next release: 13 February Oct/Sep Nov/Oct Dec/Nov Janu19 January Febru13 February 2018 Oct/Sep Nov/Oct Dec/Nov 2017

State Safety Oversight Program

FutureMetrics LLC. 8 Airport Road Bethel, ME 04217, USA. Cheap Natural Gas will be Good for the Wood-to-Energy Sector!

Market Report Series Oil 2018

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

AOBA Utility Committee

Changes to America s Gasoline Pool. Charles Kemp. May 17, Baker & O Brien, Inc. All rights reserved.

Oil and gas prices down off 2008 highs

Low Emissions Drilling Power for Onshore Rigs. Ryan Roudebush New Product Manager Land Drilling Caterpillar Inc. May 19 th 2011

Honda Accord theft losses an update

A Clean Diesel State of Mind Top States for Diesel Drivers

7/21/2016. Tradition methods. Special studies. Maintenance Division Inter Agency Contract. Summer 2016

Wyoming: At the Crossroads of the Boom

UTC Region 5 Meeting. Justin J Kringstad Geological Engineer Director North Dakota Pipeline Authority

Caution and Disclaimer The contents of these materials are for information purposes and are provided as is without representation or warranty of any

ANNUAL FINANCIAL PROFILE OF AMERICA S FRANCHISED NEW-CAR DEALERSHIPS

Characteristics of Minimum Wage Workers: 2011

The Supply of Oil. Projections to Oil and the Macroeconomy in a Changing World Federal Reserve Bank of Boston June 9, 2010 Boston, MA

Like a Box of Chocolates The Condensate Dilemma. 3rd Annual NGLs Forum

WRAP Oil & Gas: 2002/2005 and 2018 Area Source Controls Evaluation

WESTERN EIM BENEFITS REPORT Second Quarter 2018

Retail Electric Rates in Deregulated and Regulated States: 2016 Update

2010 Motorcycle Risk Study Update

GoToBermuda.com. Q3 Arrivals and Statistics at September 30 th 2015

August ATR Monthly Report

Retail Electric Rates in Deregulated and Regulated States: 2010 Update

Statement before the New Hampshire House Transportation Committee. Research on primary-enforcement safety belt use laws

ANNUAL FINANCIAL PROFILE OF AMERICA S FRANCHISED NEW-CAR DEALERSHIPS

The Shale Boom Heard Around the World

Eagle Ford Shale Energy Developments. Ioannis Tsapakis, Ph.D. Cesar Quiroga, Ph.D., P.E.

Fisher, Sheehan & Colton Public Finance and General Economics Belmont, Massachusetts

Information. Transactions. Advisory. Information. Transactions. Advisory.

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 30, 2013 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER AND ANNUAL 2012 (ADVANCE ESTIMATE)

Third Quarter 2017 Performance and Business Update. October 26, 2017

The Evolution of Side Crash Compatibility Between Cars, Light Trucks and Vans

Fuel Focus. Understanding Gasoline Markets in Canada and Economic Drivers Influencing Prices. Volume 10, Issue 4

Safety, Mobility, and Power Density The Case for a 2-Rig Strategy DUG Permian-Fort Worth, TX USA Mike Dynan, VP Portfolio and Strategy April 4, 2017

RELATIVE COSTS OF DRIVING ELECTRIC AND GASOLINE VEHICLES

Transcription:

Independent Statistics & Analysis U.S. Energy Information Administration il 216 For key tight oil and shale gas regions Bakken Marcellus Utica Niobrara Permian Haynesville Eagle Ford The seven regions analyzed in this report accounted for 92% of domestic oil growth and all domestic natural gas growth during 211-14. Contents Year-over-year summary 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Explanatory notes 1 Sources 11

Year-over-year summary il 216 projected through New-well oil per rig New-well gas per rig 2, -215-216 12, -215-216 1,6 1, 1,2 8, 6, 8 4, 4 2, oil () (5) (75) (1) gas (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (15) -215-216 (6) (7) -215-216 Indicated monthly in oil ( vs. ) Indicated monthly in gas ( vs. ) -215-216 -215-216 4 2 2 15 1-2 5-5 -4-6 -1-15 -2-8 - Natural gas 2,8-215 -216 18, -215-216 2,4 15, 2, 12, 1,6 1,2 8 9, 6, 4 3, U. S. Energy Information Administration 2

il 216 projected through +1 767 757 il one 966 il 957 +9 New-well oil per rig 1 new-well oil per rig 8 6 4 2 2 15 1 5 New-well gas per rig 6, new-well gas per rig 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 2 15 1 5 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 oil (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 gas (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 Indicated in oil ( vs. ) 5 - -5 1,78 +24-55 -31 1,47 Indicated in natural gas ( vs. ) 5 - -5 1,633 +31-63 -32 1,61 1,4 1,2 1, 8 6 4 2 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 Natural gas -31-32 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 U. S. Energy Information Administration 3

il 216 projected through +12 852 84 il one 2,838 il 2,829 +9 New-well oil per rig 1 8 6 4 2 new-well oil per rig 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 35 3 2 15 1 5 New-well gas per rig 6, new-well gas per rig 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 35 3 2 15 1 5 oil (2) (4) (6) (8) (1) (12) (14) (16) 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 gas (5) (1) (15) (2) () (3) (35) (4) (45) 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 Indicated in oil ( vs. ) 5-5 -1 1,246 +4-12 -62 1,184 Indicated in natural gas ( vs. ) 2 1-1 -2-3 6,45 +132-345 -213 6,192 1,8 Natural gas -62-213 1, 1,5 1,2 9 6 3 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 8, 6, 4, 2, 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 U. S. Energy Information Administration 4

il 216 projected through 27 27 il one 5,476 il 5,46 +7 New-well oil per rig 1, new-well oil per rig 8 6 4 2 3 2 15 1 5 New-well gas per rig 6, new-well gas per rig 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 3 2 15 1 5 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 oil gas (1) (1) (2) (3) (2) (4) (5) (3) 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 (6) 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 Indicated in oil ( vs. ) 1..5. -.5-1. 48 + -1-1 47 Indicated in natural gas ( vs. ) 15 1 5-5 -1 6,99 +93-156 -63 6,36 2, 1,6 1,2 8 4 Natural gas -1-63 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 U. S. Energy Information Administration 5

il 216 projected through 65 65 il one 1,987 il 1,851 +136 New-well oil per rig 2, 1,6 1,2 8 4 new-well oil per rig 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 15 12 9 6 3 New-well gas per rig new-well gas per rig 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 15 12 9 6 3 oil (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 gas (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 Indicated in oil ( vs. ) 2. 1.. -1. 41 +2-2 41 Indicated in natural gas ( vs. ) 6 4 2-2 -4 17,337 +33-39 -6 17,277 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 Natural gas 2, 18, 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216-6 U. S. Energy Information Administration 6

il 216 projected through +22 885 863 il one 2,69 il 2,544 +65 New-well oil per rig 1 8 6 4 2 new-well oil per rig 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 New-well gas per rig 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, new-well gas per rig 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 oil (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 gas (3) (6) (9) (12) (15) (18) 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 Indicated in oil ( vs. ) 3 2 1-1 -2-3 42 +16-32 -16 44 Indicated in natural gas ( vs. ) 1 5-5 -1 4,217 +47-13 -83 4,134 1, 8 6 4 2 Natural gas -16-83 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 U. S. Energy Information Administration 7

il 216 projected through +1 468 458 il one 846 il 838 +8 New-well oil per rig 5 4 3 2 1 new-well oil per rig 6 5 4 3 2 1 New-well gas per rig 3, new-well gas per rig 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 6 5 4 3 2 1 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 oil (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (1) 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 gas (2) (4) (6) (8) (1) (12) (14) (16) (18) 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 Indicated in oil ( vs. ) 1 75 5-2,36 +71-75 -4 2,32 Indicated in natural gas ( vs. ) 2 15 1 5-5 -1 7,64 +129-17 -41 7,23 2,2 2, 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, 8 6 4 2 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 Natural gas -4-41 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 U. S. Energy Information Administration 8

il 216 projected through +12 331 319 il one 7,115 il 7,36 +79 New-well oil per rig 1,4 1,2 1, 8 6 4 2 new-well oil per rig 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 5 45 4 35 3 2 15 1 5 New-well gas per rig 8,4 new-well gas per rig 7,2 6, 4,8 3,6 2,4 1,2 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 5 45 4 35 3 2 15 1 5 oil (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 gas (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 Indicated in oil ( vs. ) 6. 4. 2.. -2. 81 +4-4 81 Indicated in natural gas ( vs. ) 1 1 75 5 3,665 +76-75 +1 3,666 6 5 4 3 2 1 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 Natural gas +1 3,6 3, 2,4 1,8 1,2 6 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 U. S. Energy Information Administration 9

Explanatory notes il 216 The uses recent data on the total number of drilling in operation along with estimates of drilling productivity and estimated s in existing oil and natural gas wells to provide estimated s in oil 1 and natural gas 2 for seven key regions. EIA s approach does not distinguish between oil-directed and gas-directed because once a well is completed it may produce both oil and gas; more than half of the wells do that. one one represent EIA s estimate of an s 3 contribution to of oil and natural gas. 4 The estimation of new-well per rig uses several months of recent historical data on total for each field divided by the region's monthly, lagged by two months. 5 Current- and next-month values are listed on the top header. The month-over-month is listed alongside, with +/- signs and color-coded arrows to highlight the growth or decline in oil (brown) or natural gas (blue). New-well oil/gas per rig Charts present historical estimated monthly one coupled with the number of total drilling as reported by Baker Hughes. oil and natural gas Charts present EIA s estimates of total oil and gas s all the wells other than the. The trend is dominated by the well depletion rates, but other circumstances can influence the direction of the. For example, well freeze-offs or hurricanes can cause to significantly decline in any given month, resulting in a increase the next month when simply returns to normal levels. Projected in monthly oil/gas Charts present the combined effects of new-well and s to legacy. Total new-well is offset by the anticipated in legacy to derive the net in. The estimated in does not reflect external circumstances that can affect the actual rates, such as infrastructure constraints, bad weather, or shut-ins based on environmental or economic issues. /gas Charts present all oil and natural gas both new and legacy wells since 27. This is based on all wells reported to the state oil and gas agencies. Where state data are not immediately available, EIA estimates the based on estimated s in new-well oil/gas and the corresponding legacy. Footnotes: 1. represents both crude and condensate all formations in the region. is not limited to tight formations. The regions are defined by all selected counties, which include areas outside of tight oil formations. 2. represents gross (before processing) gas all formations in the region. is not limited to shale formations. The regions are defined by all selected counties, which include areas outside of shale formations. 3. The monthly average used in this report is calculated weekly data on total oil and gas reported by Baker Hughes. 4. A new well is defined as one that began producing for the first time in the previous month. Each well belongs to the new-well category for only one month. Reworked and recompleted wells are excluded the calculation. 5. data lag data because EIA has observed that the best predictor of the number of new wells beginning in a given month is the count of in operation two months earlier. U. S. Energy Information Administration 1

Sources il 216 The data used in the preparation of this report come the following sources. EIA is solely responsible for the analysis, calculations, and conclusions. Drilling Info (http://www.drillinginfo.com) Source of, permit, and spud data for counties associated with this report. Source of real-time rig location to estimate spudded and completed throughout the United States. Baker Hughes (http://www.bakerhughes.com) Source of rig and well counts by county, state, and basin. North Dakota and Division (https://www.dmr.nd.gov/oilgas) Source of well, permit, and completion data in the counties associated with this report in North Dakota Railroad Commission of Texas (http://www.rrc.state.tx.us) Source of well, permit, and completion data in the counties associated with this report in Texas Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (https://www.paoilandgasreporting.state.pa.us/publicreports/modules/welcome/welcome.aspx) Source of well, permit, and completion data in the counties associated with this report in Pennsylvania West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (http://www.dep.wv.gov/oil-andgas/pages/default.aspx) Source of well, permit, and completion data in the counties associated with this report in West Virginia Colorado and Conservation Commission (http://cogcc.state.co.us) Source of well, permit, and completion data in the counties associated with this report in Colorado Wyoming and Conservation Commission (http://wogcc.state.wy.us) Source of well, permit, and completion data in the counties associated with this report in Wyoming Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (http://dnr.louisiana.gov) Source of well, permit, and completion data in the counties associated with this report in Louisiana Ohio Department of Natural Resources (http://oilandgas.ohiodnr.gov) Source of well, permit, and completion data in the counties associated with this report in Ohio U. S. Energy Information Administration 11