Minnesota Autonomous Bus Pilot Industry Forum Webinar. April 20, 2017

Similar documents
T TTTTTTTTTTT T T TTT TTTT T & T TTTTT December 7, 2017

Minnesota Autonomous Shuttle. NACV Summit June 12, 2018

July 24, Rhode Island Transportation Innovation Partnership AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE MOBILITY CHALLENGE

ALASKA FORUM ON AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES

Draft Results and Recommendations

Ensuring the safety of automated vehicles

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Draft Results and Open House

Beth Kigel. Florida Transportation Commissioner. Florida s Smart Future: Innovation in Policy and Technology Planning

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

CONNECTED AND AUTOMATED TRANSPORTATION AND THE TEXAS AV PROVING GROUNDS PARTNERSHIP

Low-Speed Autonomous Shuttle Project Summary

I-35W Past, Present, and Future: METRO Orange Line

Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 1 RAILYARD ALTERNATIVES & I-280 BOULEVARD (RAB) FEASIBILITY STUDY

12/10/2018. December 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Background Information for MPRB Community Advisory Committee for 2010 Southwest Light Rail Transit Project DEIS Comment Letter Section 2

Welcome The City has undertaken a naming exercise for the existing and future LRT lines. The SE to West LRT, as the project has been called to date,

12/5/2018 DRAFT. December 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

2/1/2018. February 1, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Corridor Management Committee. March 7, 2012

DFW HSR Station Plans People Movers Hyperloop

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

Arterial Bus Rapid Transit. System Policy Oversight Committee April 7, 2014

Connected and Automated Vehicle Program Plan. Dean H. Gustafson, PE, PTOE VDOT Statewide Operations Engineer February 10, 2016

US DOE Community Partner Projects: U.S. Fuels Across America's Highways -- Michigan to Montana (M2M)

AUTOMATED VEHICLES AND TRANSIT

Intelligent Vehicle Systems

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

3/16/2016. How Our Cities Can Plan for Driverless Cars April 2016

Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor. Transit Coalition Meeting June 26, 2012

Connected and Automated Vehicle Activities in the United States

Convergence: Connected and Automated Mobility

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

An Introduction to Automated Vehicles

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Rocky Mountain. Corridor Input Team. Alternatives Overview. TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

What We Heard Report - Metro Line NW LRT

New McNicoll Bus Garage Public Open House

March, Status of U.S. Electric Drive Energy Learning Network Webinar. United States Department of Energy

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

BMW GROUP DIALOGUE. HANGZHOU 2017 TAKE AWAYS.

Automated Commercial Motor Vehicles: Potential Driver and Vehicle Safety Impacts

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

Redefining Mobility. Randy Iwasaki. Executive Director Contra Costa Transportation Authority January 18, 2018

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

West Broadway Reconstruction/LRT Design. March 19, 2015

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES AND THE TRUCKING INDUSTRY

Distributed Energy Storage John Steigers Generation Project Development Energy / Business Services

National Road Safety Action Plan in China

Community Advisory Committee. October 5, 2015

Minnesota Mileage-Based User Fee Test Results. Ray Starr Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Minnesota Department of Transportation

Troost Corridor Transit Study

Transportation 2040 Update: Technology. Transportation Policy Board April 14, 2016

Streetcar and Light Rail Design Differences. March 2015

FasTracks News. RTD s Eagle P3 Transit Project Nears Halfway Mark to Opening Day EP3 will add three commuter rail lines to metro area in 2016

Data Challenge Goethe University Frankfurt Mobility options in smart cities. DB Systel GmbH Norbert Schaffitzel T.IVP 21 Frankfurt 19/04/2018

Future Vehicle Safety: Connected, Cooperative, or Autonomous? Christopher Poe, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Agency Director

AHEAD OF THE CURVE ENHANCEMENTS TO ONTARIO S AUTOMATED VEHICLE PILOT PROGRAM MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION ONTARIO

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

Amman Green Policies Projects and Challenges. Prepared by: Eng. Sajeda Alnsour Project coordinator Sept. 20, 2017

Janice Fortunato Senior Director Business Partnerships

Connected Vehicles for Safety

2018 Long Range Development Plan Update Community Advisory Group- February 21, 2018

The Future of Transit and Autonomous Vehicle Technology. APTA Emerging Leaders Program May 2018

BC Pilot Car Load Movement Guidelines. Task Force on Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Policy. December 14, 2016

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Automated Occupancy Detection October 2015 (Phase I) Demonstration Results Presented by Kathy McCune

Application of Autonomous Driving Technology to Transit

Partial Automation for Truck Platooning

The Age of Vehicle Automation: Opportunities for Transportation Providers. BusCon 2017 Indianapolis, Indiana September 12, 2017

Northeast Autonomous and Connected Vehicle Summit

Welcome to the NSTA Library

Created by: St. Louis County

2013/2014 Strategic Priorities Fund Application Overview

Essex Junction Train Station Access and Scoping Study Discussion of Transportation Alternatives

AEP Utilities Presentation

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Organization. SDOT Date and Commute Seattle. Dave Sowers, Deputy Program Administrator

Autonomous Urban Mobility

Strategy for Promoting Centers of Excellence (CoE) Activities

Energy Transformation In the Transport Sector. FRANCIS ROMANO Knights Energy

Development of California Regulations for the Testing and Operation of Automated Vehicles on Public Roads

PROMOTING THE UPTAKE OF ELECTRIC AND OTHER LOW EMISSION VEHICLES

Governor s Advisory Council on Connected and Automated Vehicles

A Vision for Highway Automation

Opportunities to Leverage Advances in Driverless Car Technology to Evolve Conventional Bus Transit Systems

CONNECTED AND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES TYLER SVITAK CONNECTED AND AUTONOMOUS TECH PROGRAM MANAGER CDOT INTELLIGENT TRANPSORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)

Targeted Group Business and Veteran- Owned Small Business Programs

METI Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. METI s Automated driving Demo

Where will. BRT run? BRT will serve 20 stations along the line, connecting to bus routes and serving major destinations. How often will service run?

Emerging Technologies & Autonomous Vehicle Readiness Planning. Georgia Planning Association Conference Jekyll Island, GA September 5, 2018

Rapid Transit Implementation Working Group #4 February 9, 2017

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017

Parking Management Element

Transcription:

Minnesota Autonomous Bus Pilot Industry Forum Webinar April 20, 2017

Opening Remarks Sue Mulvihill Welcome Panel Introductions Jay Hietpas, MnDOT Dick Wolsfeld, AECOM Daryl Taavola, AECOM Kian Sabeti, WSB Webinar Goals Page 2

Webinar Agenda Pilot Overview Partnership Opportunities Pilot Concepts Selection Process Q & A Page 3

Minnesota & Automated Vehicles MN is OPEN for Business Minnesota Jurisdictional AV/CV Committee Minnesota Guidestar MnDOT Examining Statutes/Rules ID Statutes/Rules Limiting AVs ID Possibilities within Current Statutes/Rules Currently Not Promoting Legislation 4

MN AV Bus Pilot Overview Jay Hietpas Background and Goals Project Status Related Activities Pilot Schedule Page 5

Project Minnesota Autonomous Bus Pilot Research vehicle and infrastructure requirements to safely operate an autonomous bus in cold weather climate conditions Objective 1 Define project pilot, perform feasibility study, perform preliminary engineering and solicit for autonomous vehicle technology vendors Objective 2 Finalize design/deployment plan with technology vendor and conduct pilot Page 6

Project Goals Why are we doing this? SNOW & ICE OPERATIONS MOBILITY INFRASTRUCTURE INFLUENCE PARTNERSHIPS Prepare autonomous vehicle industry for snow & ice conditions Identify challenges and strategies for safe operation of third party autonomous vehicles on MnDOT's transportation system Prepare for improved mobility services through autonomous vehicles Identify the infrastructure that is needed to ensure safe operation of autonomous vehicles Increase Minnesota's visibility and influence on advancing autonomous & connected vehicles Enhance partnerships between government and the autonomous vehicle industry RFP Goal - solicit a technology vendor to come to Minnesota to work with the stakeholders in safely demonstrating the technology Page 7

Project Activities What are we doing? 1 2 3 Assess AV Technology Develop Project Site Location Plan Establish Project Requirements 6 5 4 Prepare for Test Finalize Pilot Site Requirements Select Technology Vendor 7 8 Perform Live Test Evaluate Lessons Learned Project Status defining pilot requirements and preparing a vendor RFP Page 8

MN Regulatory Review Cursory Findings No definition of an AV Regulations Define a driver as a person and physically in control of vehicle Define a person as every natural person, firm, copartnership, association, or corporation Impacts to MN AV Bus Public Roadway Testing Meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) for public roadway use Driver must be trained in use and operation of the AV technologies Must be mechanism to engage / disengage the AV technology Include indemnity, adequate insurance requirements, and other contractual mitigations Successfully complete testing on a private / closed roadway before public roadway operations 9

Pilot Schedule When will this happen? Phase I Phase II Develop Pilot Requirements (Spring 2017) Select Vendor (Summer/Fall 2017) Controlled Test: MnROAD + Super Bowl Showcase (Winter 2017-2018) Phase III (Optional) Future Phase IV Public Roadway / BRT Test(s) 2018 Area Transit System Deployment(s) (TBD) Testing Schedule allows for testing during winter 2017-2018 Page 10

Possible Super Bowl Venue Showcase Super Bowl LII Possible test showcase for Technology Vendor Smart Corridor loop being planned to showcase CAV Top Ideas AV for Minneapolis Convention Center & Hotels AV Parking Lot Service - Multiple private lots service to venues - Service to 3 outer security checkpoints UofM Transitway Page 11

Partnership Opportunities Dick Wolsfeld U.S. National Participation Industry Partnerships Vendor Scope Page 12

Possible U.S. National Partners Possible Partners Areas with 80-90% controlled access BRT systems Cold climate areas Three areas have expressed interest Benefits Leverage input from multiple states Multi-state interaction Build relationships Future testing in other states Other U.S. State Participation Phase 1 Finalize pilot requirements Phase 2 MN controlled testing Phase 3 Public roadway / BRT testing Future Area Transit System Deployment(s) Page 13

AV Industry & Bus Company Opportunities Vehicle Requirement Full size bus or small shuttle MN AV Bus Pilot Opportunity Vendors with existing AV buses / shuttles AV hardware/software Retrofit companies who can partner with bus companies and propose to deliver the pilot Page 14

Vendor Scope of Work Phase Phase 1 Pilot Testing Preparation Finalize Requirements & High-Level Design Prepare Controlled Site for Testing Provide Autonomous Bus Pilot Test Vehicle Dates Sept. / Oct. 2017 Sept. / Oct. 2017 Nov. 2017 Phase 2 - Controlled Testing & Super Bowl Showcase Conduct Fair Weather Testing Conduct Cold Weather Testing Provide Acceptance Testing Reports Conduct Super Bowl Showcase Nov. 2017 Nov. / Dec. 2017 Jan. 2018 Jan. / Feb. 2018 Optional Phase 3 Public Roadway / BRT Testing Conduct Fair Weather Testing Conduct Cold Weather Testing Provide Acceptance Testing Reports Prepare Plan for Future Deployments 2018 2018 2018 2018 Page 15

MN AV Bus Pilot Concepts Daryl Taavola Pilot Site Concepts Demonstration & Testing Concepts Page 16

Phase 2: Pilot Site Concepts Proposed Controlled Test Site - MnROAD High Volume I-94 Segment Low Volume Loop N - MnDOT owned and operated - Low and high speed testing available (30 70 MPH) - Closed loop = 2.5 miles; I-94 high speed segment = 3.0 miles - Enabling environment, easily accessible and readily available - Ability to create varying test conditions - Is an AV proving ground site Page 17

Phase 2: Pilot Site Concepts Proposed Controlled Test Site - MnROAD Page 18

Pilot Demonstration Concepts SAE Levels of Automation SAE Level Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Definition Human driver does everything Automated system on vehicle can sometimes assist the human driver conduct some parts of the driving task Automated system on the vehicle can actually conduct some parts of the driving task, while the human continues to monitor the driving environment and performs the rest of the driving task Automated system can both actually conduct some parts of the driving task and monitor the driving environment in some instances, but the human driver must be ready to take back control when the automated system requests Automated system can conduct the driving task and monitor the driving environment, and the human need not take back control, but the automated system can operate only in certain environments and under certain conditions Automated system can perform all driving tasks, under all conditions that a human driver could perform them Page 19

Pilot Demonstration Concepts Level of Automation Desire Level 4 Vehicle Provided by vendor full size bus or small shuttle Driver or controller mechanism to engage/disengage AV Federal compliance for Minnesota public roads FMVSS Infrastructure High-definition mapping Other? Testing Environment Controlled and semi-controlled public roadway Weather dry, cold, wet, snow/ice, salt (day/night) Page 20

Potential Demonstration Concepts Federal AV Policy Behavioral Competencies Test Runs Dry / Cold Weather Snow / Ice / Salt Speed Changes Merges Parking On-coming Vehicles Passing Car Following Slow / Stopped Vehicles Lane Changes Obstacles Traffic Signals Stop / Yield Signs Work Zones Emergency Vehicles Peds / Bikes People Directing Traffic Low / High Speed Locate Parking Lot Intersection Turns Detours Right-of-Way Decisions Other Page 21

Potential Demonstration Concepts MnROAD Test Cases Dry weather conditions Winter weather conditions Introduce other conditions Other vehicles Emergency vehicles Pedestrians and bikes Traffic signal Stop / Yield signs Lane obstacles or closures People directing traffic Other NHTSA test cases Page 22

Potential Demonstration Concepts MnROAD Low Volume Loop Sample Testing Duration: 2 4 weeks Page 23

Pilot Site Concepts Possible Super Bowl Showcases (open to vendor proposals) Candidate Site Ownership Type of Environment Miles of Route Use Complexity Secure Speed Twin Cities Area / Super Bowl Showcase Sites Super Bowl Venues Cities of Minneapolis, Saint Paul, Bloomington Public Roads; open traffic to all vehicles on road 1-5 miles (TBD) Depends on route Unsecured, open to all traffic 10-30 MPH Super Bowl Event Parking in Private Lots Minneapolis / Saint Paul Metro Area Private Parking Lots w/ other traffic and peds 1-5 miles (TBD) Low Secured, private lots 10-30 MPH Page 24

Pilot Site Concepts Possible Public Roadway / BRT Sites (open to vendor proposals) Candidate Site Ownership Type of Environment Miles of Route Use Complexity Secure Speed Twin Cities Area U of M Transitway Other States U of M Traffic limited to buses, bikes, peds, emergency vehicles 2.6 miles Low - Medium Semi controlled with road signs, traffic signals 20-40 MPH TBD TBD Other Candidate Sites Canal Park in Duluth, MN City of Duluth, Duluth Transit Authority Tourists; open traffic to all vehicles on road; peds 1-3 miles Low - Medium Semicontrolled geometrics, open to all traffic 30 MPH Private Companies Private Industry sites (TBD) Private Lots or routes w/ open traffic on roads TBD Low - Medium TBD - Secured to Unsecured 10-40 MPH Page 25

Twin Cities Area U of M Transitway City of Minneapolis City of St. Paul City of Bloomington Mall of America Page 26

Phase 2: Super Bowl Concepts Possible Super Bowl Showcase Convention Center / Hotels Parking Ramps ABC Light Rail Transit Hotel Hotel Convention Center US Bank Stadium - Downtown Minneapolis will be site of many events - Nicollet Mall is designated as Super Bowl Central Page 27

Phase 2: Super Bowl Concepts Possible Super Bowl Showcase MOA Area Opportunities International Airport Hotels MOA - MOA is adjacent to hotels and MSP airport Page 28

Phase 3: Public Roadway / BRT Site Possible Public Roadway / BRT Site U of M Transitway - Use requires revision to UofM Regents Ordinance and User Agreement Page 29

Duluth Area Duluth MnROAD Twin Cities Page 30

Duluth Area Convention Center Canal Park Page 31

Phase 3: Public Roadway - Duluth Possible Public Roadway Test Site Canal Park in Duluth Possible low speed loop at Duluth tourist site Page 32

Phase 3: Private Sites Private Company Campuses Discussions underway with private businesses Investigating opportunities to support business transportation logistics and movement of employees Page 33

Open to Vendor Concepts and Ideas Controlled testing logistics Public roadway / BRT site recommendation Super Bowl showcase ideas Proposed vehicle type SAE level of automation Operational and demonstration strategies Back office / control team strategies for test sites Live Tests Autonomous Bus Lessons Learned Page 34

Selection Process Kian Sabeti Selection Process & Contracting Method Next steps Page 35

Vendor Selection Process RFP for Professional Technical Services Contract Sample contract available at www.dot.state.mn.us/autonomous/ Page 36

Next Steps Issue RFP Vendor Selection Process Selection Process Notice to Proceed June - July 2017 Aug- Sept 2017 Oct - Dec 2017 Jan - Feb 2018 Finalize Pilot Requirements Controlled Testing Super Bowl Showcase Key Contract Milestones Page 37

Preferred Pilot Elements Vehicle Summary of High-Level Concepts Vendor to provide vehicle Full size bus or smaller shuttle Focus on winter weather operations for lessons learned Demonstrations First test at controlled site Super Bowl showcase opportunity Desire public roadway / BRT demonstration Page 38

Questions & Answers Page 39

Thank you again! Jay Hietpas, PE jay.hietpas@state.mn.us 651-234-7004 Minnesota Autonomous Bus Pilot Industry Forum Webinar 40