Railroad Impact Study

Similar documents
BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Central Park Drives Traffic Management Overview

City of Marina. Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: Transportation Agency for Monterey County

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Regional Transportation System The regional transportation system is discussed in Chapter 5, Section 5.7.

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Regional Transportation System The regional transportation system is discussed in Chapter 5, Section 5.7.

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

US 69/75 Controlled Access Highway and Grade Separations Benefit-Cost Analysis Narrative

Basic Project Information

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

City of Pacific Grove

We Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network:

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

METRO Light Rail Update

Green Line Long-Term Investments

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Mountainland Association of Governments SPRINGVILLE-SPANISH FORK AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY APRIL 2012

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Traffic Engineering Study

ARE DIAMONDS LRT S BEST FRIEND? AT-GRADE LRT CROSSING AT A DIAMOND INTERCHANGE

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement

TBARTA USF to Wesley Chapel Express Bus Service Operating Plan. Draft 3/25/2014

Ryan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY Boston Post Road Realignment and Roundabout Design Report

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

WOODVILLE HIGHWAY (SR 363) PD&E STUDY From Capital Circle Southeast To Paul Russell Road FPID NUMBER: Public Hearing

Community Advisory Committee. October 5, 2015

Capital Metro Downtown Multimodal Station

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

The Jack A. Markell Trail Delaware s Bicycle Highway New England Bike- Walk Summit

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

A Gap-Based Approach to the Left Turn Signal Warrant. Jeremy R. Chapman, PhD, PE, PTOE Senior Traffic Engineer American Structurepoint, Inc.

Exhibit A Sound Transit Board Resolution R Selecting the bicycle, pedestrian, and parking access improvements to be built for the Puyallup

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Highway 23 New London Access & Safety Assessment. Public Open House #2 October 3, :00 to 7:00 PM

Pace Bus Depot Location Analysis

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Call for Projects Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Emissions Formulas Technical Advisory Committee

VIADUCT LOCATION STUDY. October 19, 2009

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

AVERAGE DELAY PER VEHICLE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE

Traffic Management Plan and Queuing Analysis Lakehill Preparatory School Z Hillside Drive, Dallas, TX October 27, 2015

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Speed Evaluation Saw Mill Drive

Technical Feasibility Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

New Buck O Neil (U. S. 169) Crossing Benefit-Cost Analysis. Kansas City, Missouri

Draft Results and Open House

Transit Vehicle (Trolley) Technology Review

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

Draft Results and Recommendations

April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435

3.15 SAFETY AND SECURITY

Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report

Committee Report. Transportation Committee. Business Item No

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Needs and Community Characteristics

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

RAILROAD PREEMPTION FORMS. Mark Johnson, P.E.

1.0 Detailed Definition of Alternatives

2016 Congestion Report

Quantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios:

Traffic Generation November 28, Mr. Todd Baker Baker Properties, LLC 953 Islington Street Suite 23D Portsmouth, NH 03801

Appendix 5. Haymeadow Interim Traffic Analysis

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

Final Interchange Justification Report

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

Transcription:

Railroad Impact Study Ryan Huebschman, PE, PTOE Jason O Neill November 21, 2016

Study Impetus CSXT to lease and improve rail line between Louisville and Indianapolis Rail improvements will allow CSXT to make several changes to rail traffic in the corridor Changes to rail traffic are expected to be fully implemented by 2018 2

Rail Traffic Changes Increased Train Volume Existing Proposed 8 per day 22 per day Increased Train Length Existing Proposed 5,100 ft 7,500 ft Increased Car Weight (per car) Increased Car Height Existing Proposed Existing Proposed LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS 263,000 lbs LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS 286,000 lbs Single Stacked Double Stacked Increased Speed Existing (10-15 mph) 20 40 0 60 80 120 100 2018 Louisville - Indy (49mph) 20 40 0 60 80 120 100 Except Columbus (20 mph) 20 40 0 60 80 120 100 3

Study Objectives Identify Impact of Train Events Traffic / Travel Time Columbus Economy Identify Mitigation Options Traffic / Travel Time Economic Impact Cost of Improvements Existing Rail Alignment 1 8 Legend Study Intersection With Adjacent Railroad Crossing Study Intersection Without Adjacent RR Crossing City Limits Mainline Track Spur 4

RR Track Crossings/ Day General Public 362 School Buses 132 Transit Buses 1,900 Delivery Trucks 63,300 Passenger Cars Emergency Services 8 Police Emergency Runs 2 Fire Responses 2 Ambulance Runs 5

Types of Impacts Quantitative Qualitative Train Delay* Quality of Life Economic Impact* Public Safety Implications Noise from Trains Transit Service Impacts - School Bus Impacts - Access to Public Facilities * Focus of this study 6

Public Safety & Transit Fire, EMS and Police frequently respond to calls on the opposite side of the tracks All transit routes cross the tracks twice an hour Emergency response calls are random Train events have no set schedule Changes in rail traffic will have substantial negative impacts on each of these services 7

Public Facilities Increased Rail Traffic Results In: Less Accessibility More Noise for Users Longer Emergency Response Times Unreliable bus schedules Mill Race Park Mill Race Center 8

Train Delay (Daily Basis) SR 46 9

SR 46 & SR 11 Analysis Period Hour of Day 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Year Minutes of Disrupted Traffic Flow on SR 46 AM Peak (Eastbound) PM Peak (Westbound) Chance of Being Delayed by a Train AM Peak (Eastbound) PM Peak (Westbound) 2016 26.6 23 11% 10% 2018 87.5 121 36% 50% 2036 196.5 203.5 82% 85% Note: Peak = 4-hour time period SR 46 crossing is the worst crossing between Louisville and Indianapolis in terms of train delay. Source: CSX Environmental Analysis Document for proposed rail changes 10

2018 Economic Impact After Start of Increased Train Traffic Economic Output $4.0M $34.4M Labor Income $923K $7.8M Current Rail Delay Impacts Estimated Impacts in 2018 Jobs 17 jobs 148 jobs 11

Economic Impacts in Context 600 Current Rail Delay Impacts $424 Estimated Impacts in 2018 300 $173 0 $50 Lost Labor Income per Household $18 Value of Lost Leisure Time per Household 12

Mitigation Means to reduce the impact of trains on the community 13

Alternatives Being Evaluated Alternative Rail Improvements Roadway Improvements 1 No Build None None 2 Railroad Realignment 3 4 5 Railroad Realignment + SR 46 Grade Separated Crossing SR 46 & SR 11 Intersection Improvement (INDOT) SR 46 Partially Grade Separated Crossing Railroad realigned to avoid Downtown Railroad realigned to avoid Downtown Existingrailroad alignment retained Existingrailroad alignment retained New at-grade crossing on SR 46 Grade separated crossing on SR 46 SR 46 & SR 11 intersection converted to interchange Eastbound lanes of SR 46 are grade separated 14

N 46 Alternative 1 Do Nothing Construction Cost Annual Economic Benefit Daily Train Delay $0.0M $0.0 M 960 veh-hr 11 CR 200 S 15

N At-Grade Crossing Alternative 2 Railroad Realignment Construction Cost TBD Annual Economic Benefit $30.2 M Daily Train Delay 112 veh-hr At-Grade Crossing 46 Proposed Railroad 11 16

N At-Grade Crossing Alternative 3 RR Realignment + SR 46 Overpass Construction Cost TBD Annual Economic Benefit $34.0 M Daily Train Delay 11 veh-hr Grade Separated Crossing Proposed Railroad 46 11 17

46 N Grade Separated Crossing 11 Alternative 4 SR 46 & SR 11 Interchange Construction Cost TBD Annual Economic Benefit $22.3 M Daily Train Delay 282 veh-hr 18

N At-Grade Crossing (Westbound SR 46) 46 Grade Separated Crossing (Eastbound SR 46) Alternative 5 SR 46 Partially Grade Separated Crossing Construction Cost TBD Annual Economic Benefit $11.8 M Daily Train Delay 657 veh-hr 11 19

Economic Impact of Alternatives Total Annual Economic Output Loss in 2018 No Mitigation $34.4 M loss Railroad Realignment $30.2 M RR Realignment + SR 46 Grade Separation $34.0 M SR 46 & SR 11 Intersection Improvement $22.3 M SR 46 Partially Grade Separated Crossing $11.8 M 20

Economic Impact Summary of Alternatives 2018 Economic Impacts Alternative Loss of Economic Output Loss of Labor Income Loss of Jobs 1 No Build $34.4 M $7.8 M 148 2 3 4 5 Railroad Realignment + SR 46 At-Grade Crossing Railroad Realignment + SR 46 Grade Separated Crossing SR 46 & SR 11 Intersection Improvements SR 46 Partially Grade Separated Crossing $4.2 M $1.0 M 18 $0.4 M $0.1 M 2 $10.1 M $2.3 M 44 $22.5 M $5.1 M 97 21

Economic Impact Comparison Quantifies the full impact of rail induced travel delay on the local Columbus economy. Provides a consistent process for comparing the economic outcomes of policy alternatives. Communicates the full impact of the project to local, state and federal stakeholders and policy makers. INDOT uses a simplified and more restrictive benefit/cost methodology to evaluate projects for its transportation program. 22

INDOT Benefit Cost Methodology Benefit = User Delay Cost Savings of Alternative Cost = Construction Cost of Alternative 0.0 1.0 Project Should NOT Be Undertaken Further Evaluation of Benefits Necessary Project Should Be Undertaken 23

INDOT Benefit Cost Methodology Alternative Construction Cost (1) 2018 Daily Train Delay (veh-hrs) Train Delay (veh-hrs) thru 2036 (2) User Delay (3) Benefit (Travel Time Savings) 1 No Build 0 960 5,404,187 $ 81,062,800 $ - 0.0 B/C Ratio 2 Railroad Realignment TBD 112 630,663 $ 9,459,940 $ 71,602,860 < 1.0 Railroad Realignment + 3 SR 46 Grade Separated Crossing TBD 11 59,234 $ 888,503 $ 80,174,297 < 1.0 SR 46 & SR 11 4 Intersection TBD 282 1,585,367 $ 23,780,512 $ 57,282,288 1.0 Improvement 5 SR 46 Partially Grade Separated Crossing TBD 657 3,696,868 $ 55,453,018 $ 25,609,782 1.0 (1) ROW costs, wetland mitigation, and floodway mitigation costs are not included. (2) Annual train delay = Daily Train Delay X 260 days. Annual delays are assumed to increase linearly between 2018 &2036. (3) User costs associated with train delay are based on a $15/hour value of commuter costs, as obtained from Section 81.03 the INDOT Design Manual. 24

Next Steps Coordinate & partner with INDOT Discuss rail realignment with CSX Seek project funding 25

Questions Ryan Huebschman, PE, PTOE American Structurepoint, Inc. 7260 Shadeland Station Indianapolis, IN 46256 317.547.5580 rhuebschman@structurepoint.com Jason O'Neill Policy Analytics, LLC 1 N. Pennsylvania St., Suite 530 Indianapolis, IN 46204 317.860.0785 joneill@policyanalyticsllc.com 26