Rapid Analysis Methods for Oils and Biofuels Using IR/NIR Spectroscopy

Similar documents
Louis Dreyfus Claypool Holdings, LLC. Biodiesel Production Plant Claypool, Indiana

Project Reference No.: 40S_B_MTECH_007

MB3600-CH30 Laboratory FT-NIR analyzer for biodiesel applications Suitable for production optimization and product quality assessment

ASTM D Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel (B 100) Blend Stock for Distillate Fuels

Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures ~ Fuels & Lubricants

Quantitative Analysis of Chemical Compositions from Various Sources of Crude Glycerine

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 251 BIODIESEL PRODUCTION (November 2004)

Biodiesel Business Environment

Title Jozef Mikulec 1, Ján Cvengroš 3, Andrea Kleinová 3, Tomáš Cvengroš 2, Ľudmila Joríková 1 1

Biodiesel Fuel Quality

Prodigy ICP Application Note: # 1039

Novel Quantitative Method for Biodiesel Analysis

Production of Biodiesel from Used Groundnut Oil from Bosso Market, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria

Biofuels and characteristics

Biodiesel Technical Issues related to Biodiesel Production, Handling, Storage, and Use in Diesel Engines

Monitoring Biodiesel Fuel Quality

Biodiesel Analysis Utilizing Mini-Scan - Handheld Analyzer V.C. Gordon PhD, Bonanza Labs

What is Biodiesel? Biodiesel consists of alkyl-esters derived from a biological source

Technical Corn Oil Review December 2017

Determining the Ethanol Content of Denatured Fuel Ethanol Using Near Infrared. Gulf Coast Conference Patrick Ritz PAC LP

PROJECT REFERENCE NO.: 39S_R_MTECH_1508

Can Fish Farms Use On Farm Biodiesel Production? Matt Veal, PhD NCSU Biological and Agricultural Engineering

Tennessee Department of Agriculture

Application Note. Author. Introduction. Energy and Fuels

WASTE TO ENERGY. Commercial Enzymatic Production of Biodiesel

The Purification Feasibilityof GlycerinProduced During

Biodiesell productionn withh Lewatit GF202 Lewatit GF202

Annex to the Accreditation Certificate D-PL according to DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Quality Testing for Small Scale Biodiesel. Sam Parker Piedmont Biofuels

MEASURE. BIOFUEL PARAMETERS When and Where You Need To. Coen Duvekot Product Marketing Manager, MicroGC

This presentation focuses on Biodiesel, scientifically called FAME (Fatty Acid Methyl Ester); a fuel different in either perspective.

Standard Test Method for Sulfur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke Using High-Temperature Tube Furnace Combustion

SYNTHESIS OF BIODIESEL

7.09 ULTRASONIC ANALYZER

Determination of Phenolic Antioxidant DBPC and DBP Levels in Electrical Insulating Oil

New Technologies In the Dry Grind Corn Ethanol Industry Hunter Flodman, PhD Department of Chemical Engineering University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Biodiesel is NOT raw vegetable oil or SVO (Straight Vegetable Oil) or refined oil or filtered used cooking oil.

Determination of Free and Total Glycerin in B100 Biodiesel

Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil A Renewable Blend for Diesel Engines

Biodiesel Analytics. Important Parameters and their Meaning

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17043:2010. ASTM INTERNATIONAL 100 Barr Harbor Drive West Conshohocken, PA Amy Meacock

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION

ETHANOL PRODUCTION SYNERGY STARCH AND BIOMASS?

BDI BioEnergy International GmbH

Palm Fatty Acids Esterification on Heterogeneous Catalysis

Free and Total Glycerol in B100 Biodiesel by Gas Chromatography According to Methods EN and ASTM D6584

BQ-9000 Quality Management System. Producer Requirements

Technologies for biodiesel and bioethanol. Emile van Zyl Johann Görgens

2007 B100 Quality Survey Results

Analytical and Testing Instruments for Renewable Fuels. Shimadzu s Analytical Solutions for the Renewable Fuels Industry

Alternative Automotive Fuels - Biodiesel

Keywords: Simarouba Glauca, Heterogeneous base catalyst, Ultrasonic Processor, Phytochemicals.

Maple Leaf Foods Biodiesel Production A project not for the faint of heart

On-Line NIR Analysis for Blending

Biodiesel Update. Eagle Core Team. Edward J. Lyford-Pike Advanced Engineering, Advanced Alternative Fuels group

(i) Place a cross in the box next to a pair of greenhouse gases.

TULSION BIODIESEL PRODUCTION: WET VS. DRY WHICH METHOD SHOULD YOU USE?

ANNEX 2, REFERENCE FUELS

Supply of Services for Detailed OEB Crude Assay Analysis

Dr. Onkar S. Tyagi. Indian Institute of Petroleum Dehradun.

Determination of Free and Total Glycerin in Pure Biodiesel (B100) by GC in Compliance with EN 14105

Enhancing Winter Performance With Distilled Biodiesel. Copyright 2017 Renewable Energy Group, Inc.

NEDO Biodiesel Production Process by Supercritical Methanol Technologies. Shiro Saka

Background on Biodiesel

Effects of Biodiesel on Plastics

COLOMBIA. 2. Vehicle categories: 2.1. Categories for application with European limits. M = Passenger vehicle N = Commercial vehicle

Going Green: The Analysis of BioFuels

GLYCERIN PACKAGE 100mL $ Glycerin, Ibs/gallon, MONG Material Organic, Non-Glycerin, Ash, Specific Gravity, Moisture by Karl Fisher, Methanol

What is Biodiesel? Biodiesel consists of alkyl-esters derived from a biological source

New Small Spectrometer Concepts Covering the Ultraviolet to the Mid-Infrared

Biodistillate Fuels and Emissions in the U.S.

(833) SUPERCRITICAL BIODIESEL PRODUCTION METHOD

Biodiesel. As fossil fuels become increasingly expensive to extract and produce, bio-diesel is

Analysis of biodiesel oil (as per ASTM D6751 & EN 14214) using the Agilent 5100 SVDV ICP-OES

Shimadzu Analytical Solutions for Biofuels Research and Quality Assurance

Why Choose SRS Engineering?

Published in Offshore World, April-May 2006 Archived in

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

Differences in raw material sources for biofuel processing

WNC s Biofuels Market & Supply Chain

Overview of BIODEPRO EU Project and Prion Inactivation in the Biodiesel Process

Conventional Homogeneous Catalytic Process with Continuous-typed Microwave and Mechanical Stirrer for Biodiesel Production from Palm Stearin

The Analysis of Biodiesel for Trace Metals and the Development of Certified Biodiesel Standards

Appendix A.1 Calculations of Engine Exhaust Gas Composition...9

We re Going Global ETHANOL

Determination of phase diagram of reaction system of biodiesel

Fuel Related Definitions

A Novel Non-catalytic Biodiesel Production Process by Supercritical Methanol as NEDO High Efficiency Bioenergy Conversion Project

EFFECT OF BIODIESEL IMPURITIES ON FILTERABILITY AND PHASE SEPARATION FROM BIODIESEL AND BIODIESEL BLENDS. National Biodiesel Conference 2008

Module 1f. This presentation. Biofuels. Biogas Landfil gas Producergas Bioethanol Biodiesel Pyrolysis oil Solid fuels

Integrating Biofuels into the Energy Industry

Biodiesel and Renewable Fuels

products from the bio-fuels industry Steven Rust Michigan State University

Alternative feedstocks and technologies for advanced biofuels

ANNEX 3 REFERENCE FUELS. Parameter Unit Limits (1) Test method Minimum Maximum Research octane number, RON

Where you find solutions. Strategic Biodiesel Decisions

CONVERSION OF GLYCEROL TO GREEN METHANOL IN SUPERCRITICAL WATER

Production of Bioethanol from deoiled Jatropha cake.

Production of Biodiesel from Waste Oil via Catalytic Distillation

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development PRODUCTION OF AN ALTERNATIVE FUEL FROM A LOW COST FEEDSTOCK- AN ECONOMICAL VIEW

Transcription:

Rapid Analysis Methods for Oils and Biofuels Using IR/NIR Spectroscopy Ching-Hui Tseng, Nan Wang Eurofins QTA, Inc. July 2013 1

Biofuels Fuel produced from renewable resources, especially plant biomass, vegetable oils, and treated municipal and industrial wastes. Biodiesel is made by processing vegetable oils and other fats. It can be used either in pure form or as an additive to petroleum-based diesel fuel. Bioethanol is produced by fermenting the sugars in biomass materials such as corn and agricultural residues etc. It is used in internal-combustion engines either in pure form or more often as a gasoline additive.

Biodiesel Reaction (Trans-esterification) 3

Biodiesel Production & Testing Segregation Consistency Price Test Oil Grease ROH Catalyst Optimization Efficiency Consistency Quality Test Test Glycerine Biodiesel Test

Tests for Biodiesel Production To produce quality biodiesel: The in-coming fat/oil needs to be tested to see if pretreatment is needed and the pretreatment outcome is satisfactory. The trans-esterification reaction can be monitored by testing the inprocess samples. The finished biodiesel need to meet ASTM D6751 (US) or EN14214 (Europe) standards to be used as biodiesel or blended with diesel fuel.

Biodiesel Traditional Testing Methods -- Specification for Biodiesel (B100) ASTM D6751-11a Property ASTM Method Limits Units Methanol EN 14110 0.2 max %mass Water by KF D6304 0.05 %mass Kinematic Viscosity, 40 C D445 1.9 6.0 mm 2 /sec Sulfur, S15 Grade D5453 15 max ppm Cloud Point D2500 Report C Acid Number D664 0.5 max Mg KOH/g Free Glycerin D6584 0.020 max %mass Total Glycerin D6584 0.240 max %mass Oxidation Stability EN15751 3 min hours Cetane D613 47 min Cold Soak Filtration D7501 360 max seconds

Biodiesel Traditional Testing Methods- Specification for Biodiesel (B100) EN14214 Property EN Method Limits Units Methanol, EN 14110 0.2 max %mass Water by KF EN ISO 12937 500 max mg/kg Viscosity, 40 C EN ISO 3104, ISO 3105 3.5 5.0 mm 2 /sec Sulfur EN ISO 20846, EN ISO 20884 10 max mg/kg Pour Point ISO 3016 Report C Acid Value EN14104 0.5 max mg KOH/g Free Glycerin EN14105, EN14106 0.020 max %mass Total Glycerin EN14105 0.25 max %mass Oxidation Stability, 110 C EN15751/EN14112 6 min hours Cetane EN ISO 5165 51 min Ester Content, EN 14103 96.5 min %mass Cold Filter Plugging Point EN 116 C Iodine Value EN 14111 120 max g iodine/100g Density, 15 C EN ISO 3675, EN ISO 12185 860-900 kg/m 3

Traditional Analysis Methods of Biodiesel Production In-coming oil: Free fatty acids: gas chromatography (GC) Moisture: Karl Fischer In-Process: Mono-, di- & tri- glycerides, total & free glycerin: GC method Finished B100 biodiesel: Total & free glycerin, methanol: GC method Acid number, cloud point, moisture, oxidation stability, CFPP, density, ester content, iodine value etc.: different equipment for each test By-product: Glycerin Ash: oven method Glycerin, methanol: GC Moisture: Karl Fischer

Traditional Analysis Method Summary In summary, the traditional methods Need a laboratory with all the required instruments Require chemists with different technical skills Expensive and resource intensive Time consuming

A Desired Technology One instrument can analyze all the materials, including feedstock, in-process samples, finished biodiesel and by-product Easy to operate so no specialized personnel is required Quick and green (no chemical reagents or waste disposal) Analyzed results are reliable Instrument and methods are easy to maintain 10

Infrared (IR) Spectroscopy It has been a very powerful analytical tool for sample identification and component analysis since the 1960s.

Principle of Infrared (IR) Spectroscopy hν Low Energy High Energy

Infrared Vibrational Energy States Harmonic Oscillation Inharmonic Oscillation Vibrational energy levels 3rd Overtone 2nd Overtone 1 st Overtone Fundamental The mid-infrared (IR) covers mostly fundamental vibrations while the near infrared (NIR) covers the overtone and combination bands

What is IR and NIR? Infrared (IR) spectroscopy : fundamental absorption of molecular functional groups, 25-2.5 µm (400-4000 cm -1 ) Near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy : overtone or combination absorption of molecular functional groups, 2.5-0.7 µm (4000-14,000 cm -1 ) Oleic Acid MIR Absorbance NIR NIR IR Wavenumber cm -1

Electromagnetic Spectrum: Infrard is between visible and microwave regions www.eurofins.com

MIR/NIR comparison MIR Absorption coefficient large (higher sensitive) NIR small (lower sensitive) Pathlength micrometers mm to tens of cm Sample container Salt, ATR quartz, glass Spectrum Sample complicated but unique (can be interpreted) Gas, liquid, paste, solid (small amount, homogeneous, e.g. biodiesel production samples ) simple but overlapped (hard to interpret) Liquid, paste, solid (large amount, inhomogeneous, e.g. bioethanol production samples) Analyzed material Good for organic Possible for inorganic Good for organic Poor for inorganic Available fiber optics 3 m (max.) 100 m (max.)

How does IR/NIR work for the qualitative analysis? Qualitative analysis - confirmation of incoming raw materials, identification of unknown samples Method - spectral matching, PCA, ANN etc. 17 8/ 19

How does IR/NIR work for the quantitative analysis? Quantitative analysis - determination of contents of chemical composition or chemical properties. Chemometric modeling is required: MLR, PLS, ANN Creating Calibrations Component A B C Units % % % spectrum1 71.30 7.03 21.67 spectrum2 79.30 3.06 17.64 spectrum3 78.40 8.34 13.26 spectrum4 84.03 4.32 11.65 spectrum11 85.02 1.34 13.64 spectrum12 78.34 3.85 17.81 1. Samples and data 2. Collect Spectrum 3. Build, Optimize Analyzing Samples & Test Model Report 1. Measure Unknown 2. Access Model Sample #081897-049 Component A 81.55% Component B 5.38% Component C 13.06% 3. Predict Concentrations 8/ 19

Challenges of using IR/NIR Need to find optimal instrument and sampling device for the application Need Chemometrics and spectroscopic experts to build and maintain methods Need lots of representative samples and good quality primary data to build the models Need to have the ability to determine and resolve any issues while using IR/NIR methods. Needs to be user-friendly; ideally can be operated by the plant operator

Example Solution of Overcoming These Challenges Internet-Enabled IR/NIR 20

Why Internet? Monitor instrument performance remotely Solve problems remotely Store and distribute data automatically Use central models for the prediction Develop or update models remotely Expand applications without limit

Why Central Models? All the application models are located at the central server Simple analyzer with a smart brain No instrument-specific models- one model for the same application in different instrument No model transfer or adjustment Consistent prediction instrument variance compensated Plug-and-play No technology limit PCR, PLS, ANN etc. Model update simultaneous for all users

Demo of the Internet-Enabled Biodiesel Analyzer (www.qta.com) 23

Works behind the Biodiesel Analyzer 24/7 helpdesk service with experts monitoring and maintaining performance Thousands spectra of real world samples with reliable primary data included in each calibration Wide range of feedstocks, including soy (virgin, crude and degummed), canola, rapeseed, poultry, tallow, choice white grease, yellow grease, waste vegetable oil, sunflower oil, castor oil, corn, palm, jatropha and blends thereof Participation in ASTM PTP (Proficiency Testing Programs) Methods underwent full round robin utilizing AOAC and ASTM methodologies

QTA Participation in ASTM PTP Total Glycerine % Aug-07 Nov-07 Apr-08 Nov-08 Apr-09 Aug-09 = Robust Mean of reference lab X = Mean of QTA results 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 47 LABS 48 LABS 51 LABS 65 LABS 63 LABS 0.2 0.15 0.1 Robust Mean QTA (%) Blue bar = range of accepted reference lab results for 47 65 labs 63 LABS 0.05 0

Example Calibration Curves on Server Monoglycerides of in-process samples Total glycerin of B100 samples QTA Model Statistics Range, % R 2, % QTA Std. Error, % 0.1 2.8 94 0.14 QTA Model Statistics Range, % R 2, % QTA Std. Error, % 0.0 0.64 93.5 0.03

EQTA IR Models of Biodiesel Process Incoming Oil Reference Method Range Standard Error FFA, % AOCS Ca 5a-40 0.0 44.5 0.3 Moisture, % KF Moisture 0.0 1.0 0.05 In-Process Reference Method Range Standard Error Monoglyceride, % ASTM D6584 0.1 3.0 0.14 Diglyceride, % ASTM D6584 0.1 5.5 0.11 Tri-glyceride, % ASTM D6584 0.1 9.9 0.18 Recovered Methanol Reference Method Range Standard Error Moisture, % KF Moisture 0.0 20.0 0.5 Crude Glycerin Reference Method Range Standard Error MeOH, % GC/FID 0.0 25.0 0.32 Glycerin, % AOCS Ea 6-94 80.0 99.9 0.9 Ash, % AOCS Ea 2-38 0.0 15.0 0.4 Moisture, % AOCS Ea 8-58 0.3 25.0 0.77

EQTA IR Models of B100 Biodiesel Product for ASTM D6751 and EN14214 Specifications QTA algorithms Reference Method Range Standard Error Free Glycerin # *, % ASTM D6584 0.00 0.03 0.004 Total Glycerin # *, % ASTM D6584 0.00 0.50 0.03 Total Acid Number #, mg KOH/g ASTM D664 0.0 1.0 0.09 Cloud Point # *, C ASTM D2500-6.0 12.0 1.5 Moisture #, % ASTM D6304 0.0 0.1 0.09 Methanol # *, % EN14110 0.0 3.0 0.06 Oxidative Stability #, Hrs EN14112 0.5 12.0 1.5 Sulfur #, ppm ASTM D6453 0.3 16.2 1.9 Ester, % EN14103 83 99.9 0.9 Iodine Value AOCS Cd 1b-87 46 152 1.2 Density, kg/m 3 ASTM D4052/D1217 873 891 1 Kinematic Viscosity, mm 2 /s ASTM D445 3.8 5.2 0.1 CFPP, C ASTM D6371-14 12 1 Monoglyceride # *, % ASTM D6584 0.1 0.9 0.09 Diglyceride, % ASTM D6584 0.1 0.6 0.06 Tri-glyceride, % ASTM D6584 0.1 0.6 0.08 # AOCS Ck 2-09 standard procedure * Approved alternative methods included in the ASTM D6751

Ethanol Production (Example: Corn Ethanol) Corn receiving and storage Fermentation Cleaning milling/grinding more enzyme -- simpler sugar Mixing: H 2 O/enzyme --corn mash Cooking to reduce bacterial Centrifuge Distillation column Molecular Sieve Ethanol Solids Thin stillage Rotary dryer Evaporator DDGS Syrup

Traditional Analysis for Bioethanol Production To ensure the quality of the bioethanol produced, quality tests are conducted for incoming corn, processed corn in the slurry tank, fermentation tank, DDGS (Dried Distillers Grains with Solubles) produced. Time consuming analytical methods have to be used to analyze moisture, oil, protein and starch of the incoming corn. HPLC method is commonly used to analyze carbohydrates (glucose, maltose, maltotrios, dextrin etc.), acids (potential inhibitors), ethanol, and other alcohols for samples from the slurry tank and the fermentation tank.

Using NIR for the analysis on in-coming corn Protein, moisture, oil, starch Rejects loads of corn on the basis of moisture Tracks corn suppliers more closely More information about the crop for process optimization

Using NIR for the Analysis on Corn Mash Measure ethanol, carbohydrates, acids, and glycerol at any time period during fermentation Quality control Trouble shooting Enzyme evaluations Supplement evaluations

Using NIR for fermenter monitoring Typical fermenter profile Increase in ethanol Decrease in dextrins, maltose, dextrose Increase in lactic acid Increase in glycerol

A Profile of Ethanol Production during Fermentation 12 11 10 9 8 % Ethanol 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 Hours of Fermentation

A Profile of Carbohydrate Reduction during Fermentation 4.0 % C a rbohy dra te 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 Dextrose Maltose Dextrins 0.5 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 Hours of Fermentation

A Profile of Lactic Acid Production During Fermentation 1.10 1.00 Lactic Acid is produced by the bacteria - Lactobacillus sp. Competes with yeast for dextrose - reduce yield % La c tic A c id 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 Lactobacillus comes from improper cleaning of fermenters undercooked corn contaminated yeast 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 Hours of Fermentation

A Profile of Glycerol Production During Fermentation % G ly c e ro l 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 Produced from yeast when under stress Increased ethanol Increased lactic acid High sugar concentration Low ph High temperature Lack of nutrients (nitrogen) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 Hours of Fermentation

Corn Models QTA Starch Model Statistics Range, %DB R 2, % QTA Std. Error, %DB 61.0 72.4 96.3 0.8 QTA Moisture Model Statistics Range, % R 2, % QTA Std. Error, % 7.3 24.8 99.3 0.3 QTA Oil Model Statistics Range, %DB R 2, % QTA Std. Error, %DB 2.6 10.7 96.6 0.4 QTA Protein Model Statistics Range, %DB R 2, % QTA Std. Error, %DB 6.3 15.5 97.6 0.4

EQTA NIR Models of Corn and DDGS Corn Range R 2, % Standard Error Oil, %DB 2.6 10.7 96.6 0.4 Protein, %DB 6.3 15.5 97.6 0.4 Moisture, % 7.3 24.8 99.3 0.3 Starch, % DB 61.0 72.4 96.3 0.8 Corn DDGS Range R 2, % Standard Error Oil, %DB 8.8 13.8 85.0 0.4 Protein, %DB 25.0 34.4 97.7 0.5 Moisture, % 5.4 16.6 98.3 0.5

EQTA NIR Models for Biethanol Slurry Tank Corn Mash form slurry tank Range R 2, % Standard Error DP2 (maltose), % 0.18 1.57 78.0 0.18 DP3 (maltotrios), % 0.0 5.2 80.4 0.63 DP4+ (dextrin), % 0.0 24.5 97.2 1.4 Acetic Acid, % 0.002 0.030 96.4 0.004 Glucose, % 0.01 2.53 97.3 0.14 Glycerol, % 0.1 2.2 87.8 0.2 Lactic acid, % 0.01 0.88 90.8 0.07 Dextrose, % 0.08 1.1 93.4 0.09 Total Solids, % 10.0 38.5 98.5 1.1

EQTA NIR Models for Bioethanol Fermentation Tank Corn Mash form fermentation tank Range R 2, % Standard Error Brix 10.0 27.9 99.3 0.66 DP2, % 0.18 9.20 87.5 0.95 DP3, % 0.06 2.75 90.8 0.20 DP4+, % 0.2 13.9 97.2 0.74 Ethanol, % 0.54 13.47 99.8 0.23 Glucose, % 0.0 16.1 96.9 0.78 Glycerol, % 0.1 2.0 87.8 0.16 Lactic acid, % 0.01 0.28 95.5 0.02 ph 3.7 5.7 76.9 0.23 Total Sugar, % 1.2 30.9 99.4 0.84

Demo of the Internet-Enabled NIR Analyzer (www.qta.com) 42

Summary Productions of biofuels, including biodiesel and bioethanol, need analytical tests at different stages to ensure the quality and yield of the products. Traditional analytical methods are expensive, timeconsuming and need many analytical devices and skills. Spectroscopic methods, IR/NIR, can be used to perform rapid analysis for multiple traits but there are some challenges when using them. An Internet-enabled IR/NIR system has been developed and successfully used in production plants worldwide for the rapid analysis of biodiesel and bioethanol.

Thank You Question? 44