Knoxville Area Transit (KAT) Transit Development Plan Downtown Transit Plan

Similar documents
9. Downtown Transit Plan

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

2019 New Transit Service Plan

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Analysis of Radial and Trunk Feeder Transit System Configurations in Downtown Charlottesville

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Central Maryland Transit Development Plan

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Wellington City Bus Review. What are we going to do this evening? The Review so far. Welcome. Draft Timetable Presentation April & May 2013

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Table 8-1: Service Frequencies for All Short-List Alternatives by Day of Week and Time of Day Frequency Day of Week Time of Day Time Period

Executive Summary October 2013

Draft Results and Open House

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

Central Maryland Transit Development Plan

Troost Corridor Transit Study

2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS

Click to edit Master title style

Proposed Revised Network Presented 10/17/2017. Kitsap Transit Board Workshop October 17, 2017

2015 LRT STATION ACTIVITY & PASSENGER FLOW SUMMARY REPORT

III. Public Transport Terminology

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Proposed Service Plan

GODURHAM PROGRESS REPORT

Central City Line Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Amendment Public Hearing. July 24, 2014

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Tarrant County Projected Population Growth

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Office of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Management Downtown Parking Meter District Rate Report

MTA New York City Transit Service Guidelines Manual

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

DRAFT BUS TRANSFORMATION PROJECT

Draft Results and Recommendations

Chicago Transit Authority Service Standards and Policies

Presentation of the Baltimore Metro System

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Downtown Hartford Transit Circulation and Through-Routing Study Transit Operations Planning Services

Michigan Avenue Corridor Study. Joint Policy / Technical Committee Meeting Wednesday, June 8, 2016

August 2, 2010 Public Meeting

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

Increase Rail Service to the Mid City Green Line Stations

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

MTA New York City Transit and MTA Bus Company System-wide Service Standards

Solano County Transit

Use of Passenger Count Data to provide Cost-Benefit Analysis of Fixed-Route Cluster Operations Helping Agencies Do More with Less

Chapter 9 Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

Capital Metro Downtown Multimodal Station

MOTION No. M Purchase of Five 40-foot Buses PROPOSED ACTION

TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE (TCC) UPDATE PRESENTATION APRIL 26, 2017

San Rafael Transit Center. Update. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District Transportation Committee of the Board of Directors

ADDENDUM NO. 3 BID NO TRANSIT VEHICLE ADVERTISING

Mr. Leif Dormsjo Director, District Department of Transportation 55 M Street, SE Washington, DC July 10, Dear Director Dormsjo,

Revised Strategy for Downtown Parking

Attachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

Figure 2-14: Existing Bus Routing at Irwindale Station

1 YORK REGION TRANSIT EXTENSION OF EXISTING DIAL-A-RIDE PILOT PROJECT AND STOCK TRANSPORTATION SCHOOL BUS CONTRACTS

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

Sound Transit East Link: Bus/LRT System Integration Study

Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 2017

DART Priorities Overview

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

Chapter Five: Transportation Impacts

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

Zero Emission Bus Impact on Infrastructure

Sean P. McBride, Executive Director Kalamazoo Metro Transit. Presentation to Michigan Transportation Planning Association July 13, 2016

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Private Sector Involvement in Sponsoring Sunday Bus Service

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Tier 2 Screening and Selection522. of the Short List Alternatives KISSIMMEE CORRIDOR. Downtown CRA. US 192 Alternatives Analysis

PAG Environmental Planning Advisory Committee Sun Link Streetcar Update May 1, 2015

Operating and Maintenance Cost Methodology Report. Durham Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Table 1 Adopted MIA Loading Standards. Bus 120% Light Rail 190% Heavy Rail 230%

Village of Plainfield Downtown Parking Study. Committee of the Whole Meeting October 24, 2016

Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment DRAFT. Alternative 4 Public Transportation: New or Improved Interstate Bus Service

JOINT FACILITIES ADVISORY COMMISSION. ART and APS Bus Parking Informational Session July 27, :30 pm

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN THE CITY OF WATERLOO

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

DETAILED DEFINITION OF ALTERNATIVES. July 2014 FINAL

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

2015 LRT PASSENGER COUNT. CAPITAL and METRO LINES

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

Caltrain Business Plan. Project Update July 2018 through January 2019

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

1 On Time Performance

NICTI Alternatives Analysis

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Transitioning to a Zero-Emission Fleet: King County Metro Transit

Transcription:

Knoxville Area Transit (KAT) Transit Development Plan Submitted to: Knoxville Area Transit and Knoxville Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission Submitted by: Connetics Transportation Group Under contract to: The Corradino Group, Inc. October 2009

CORRADINO Table of Contents KAT Transit Development Plan 1. Introduction 1 2. Existing Trolley Operations 3 2.1 Overview of Trolley Routes 3 2.2 Individual Trolley Route Profiles 5 3. Existing Downtown Fixed Route Bus Operations 27 3.1 Existing Downtown Transfer Point 27 3.2 Existing Bus Service Characteristics 27 3.3 Existing Local Service Configuration 32 3.4 Existing Weekday Route Interlines 35 3.5 Existing Downtown Street Bus Trip Volumes 39 3.6 Existing Express Service Configuration 41 4. Knoxville Station Access/Egress Alternatives 45 4.1 Knoxville Station Layout and Access/Egress 45 4.2 Identification and Evaluation of Local Bus Route Access/Egress Alternatives 47 4.3 Preferred Local Bus Route Access/Egress Alternative 52 4.4 Proposed Downtown Street Bus Trip Volumes 61 4.5 Identification and Evaluation of Express Bus Route Access/Egress Alternatives 63 5. Proposed Trolley Routes 67 5.1 Knoxville Station Access/Egress 67 5.2 Trolley Coverage of the Downtown Core 67 5.3 Proposed Trolley Routes 68 I:\Projects\3880\wp\Reports\\text.doc Page i

CORRADINO List of Figures KAT Transit Development Plan Figure 2-1 Existing Trolley Routes 4 Figure 3-1 Existing Local Route Bus Patterns: Weekdays 33 Figure 3-2 Existing Local Route Bus Patterns: North Route Details 34 Figure 3-3 Existing Local Route Bus Patterns: Extended Night 36 Figure 3-4 Existing Local Route Bus Patterns: Saturdays 37 Figure 3-5 Existing Local Route Bus Patterns: Sundays 38 Figure 3-6 Existing Bus Trips by Street Segment, Weekday Peak Hour Service, Local Routes 40 Figure 3-7 Existing Express Route Patterns: AM Service 42 Figure 3-8 Existing Express Route Patterns: PM Service 43 Figure 4-1 Knoxville Station Terminal Layout 46 Figure 4-2 Weekday Service, Proposed Local Route Bus Patterns, Alternative A, "Avoid Downtown" 48 Figure 4-3 Weekday Service, Proposed Local Route Bus Patterns, Alternative B-1, "Through Downtown to Knoxville Station" 49 Figure 4-4 Weekday Service, Proposed Local Route Bus Patterns, Alternative B-2, "Through Downtown to Knoxville Station" 50 Figure 4-5 Weekday Service, Proposed Local Route Bus Patterns, Alternative C, "Hybrid" 51 Figure 4-6 Weekday Service, Proposed Local Route Bus Patterns, Preferred Alternative 54 Figure 4-7 Detail of North Routes, Proposed Local Route Bus Patterns, Preferred Alternative 55 Figure 4-8 Extended Night Service, Proposed Local Route Bus Patterns, Preferred Alternative 56 Figure 4-9 Saturday Service, Proposed Local Route Bus Patterns, Preferred Alternative 57 Figure 4-10 Sunday Service, Proposed Local Route Bus Patterns, Preferred Alternative 58 Figure 4-11 Proposed Bus Trips by Street Segment, Weekday Peak Hour Service, Local Routes 62 Figure 4-12 AM Service, Proposed Express Route Patterns, Preferred Alternative 64 Figure 4-13 PM Service, Proposed Express Route Patterns, Preferred Alternative 65 Figure 5-1 Proposed Weekday Trolley Routes 69 Figure 5-2 Proposed Night Trolley Routes 70 Page ii

CORRADINO List of Tables KAT Transit Development Plan Table 3-1 Existing Weekday Downtown Knoxville Bus Service Characteristics 28 Table 3-2 Existing Saturday Downtown Knoxville Bus Service Characteristics 30 Table 3-3 Existing Sunday Downtown Knoxville Bus Service Characteristics 31 Table 3-4 Existing Downtown Transfer Point Local Routes 39 Table 3-5 Highest Existing Local Bus Trips/Street Segment 41 Table 4-1 Knoxville Station Distance and Average Speed Impacts 59 Table 4-2 Recommended Knoxville Station Interline Pairs 60 Table 4-3 Highest Proposed Local Bus Trips/Street Segment 61 Table 5-1 Route 80-Blue Line Trolley Existing and Proposed Characteristics 71 Table 5-2 Route 82-Orange Line Trolley Existing and Proposed Characteristics 72 Table 5-3 Route 84-Green Line Trolley Existing and Proposed Characteristics 73 Table 5-4 Route 86-Late Line Trolley Existing and Proposed Characteristics 74 Table 5-5 Route 87-Red Line Trolley Existing and Proposed Characteristics 75 Table 5-6 Operating Impacts of Proposed Trolley Routes 76 Page iii

KAT Transit Development Plan CORRADINO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page iv

CORRADINO 1. Introduction KAT Transit Development Plan The is an important and fairly unique element of the KAT Transit Development Plan (TDP). KAT recognized even before beginning a full TPD effort that a downtown trolley study and bus routing analysis is needed to support the impending opening in 2010 of a new downtown transfer point, Knoxville Station. This report presents a that focuses on both the local/express fixed route bus service and trolley route configurations. Conceived as a stand-alone document from the TDP, it focuses on KAT s existing route structure. It does not attempt to incorporate modifications to local and/or express routes outside the downtown area that are being contemplated as part of the TDP. This plan was developed in a period of change for KAT and the recommendations herein will likely be modified during the final scheduling of the routes. Section 2 of the report evaluates the current trolley routes operated by KAT, based on the results of the TDP survey efforts. This section gives an overview of the trolley system and presents detailed route profiles for each of the four trolley routes. Section 3 presents an evaluation of the existing downtown local and express bus operations. It summarizes the primary local route patterns used by KAT s local routes today to serve the existing downtown transfer point on Main Street, as well as existing express route patterns downtown. Section 4 of the report describes the development of Knoxville Station access/egress options. These options were developed based on existing and possible future route access/egress patterns to the new Knoxville Station. Since the station is currently under construction and its design has been finalized, access/egress options that required physical changes to the existing design were not considered. Several options for local route configurations, as presented to KAT and TPO staff in December 2008, as well as a preferred alternative, are presented. New express route configurations are also identified. All local bus routes serving Knoxville Station were analyzed for schedule travel time impacts to determine optimal route interline combinations. Recommendations are made to modify route interline pairs so as to present a plan that would not result in additional buses or operating cost increases for the local routes. The plan continues to assume the use of pulse scheduling, utilizing 15 minute interval departures as currently in operation. Section 5 of the report provides recommendations for modifying the trolley route system to support the opening of Knoxville Station and increase their effectiveness as downtown circulators. A frequent request of the public and stakeholders has been to re-design the trolley system as a series of linear routes, and was a key consideration during route planning. The extent to which trolley routes can be made linear in downtown Knoxville, however, is severely limited by one-way streets, narrow streets, limited turning radii, and the design of Knoxville Station with the trolley stop (requiring trolleys to travel westbound on Church Avenue). Other planning considerations included 1) operating the trolley system without requiring additional vehicles (i.e., no more than eight required for maximum service), 2) establishing frequencies supporting timed transfers between local and trolley routes, 3) serving key origins and destinations, and 4) providing some level of trolley service between downtown and Knoxville Station until 12:15 a.m. when local service ends. The recommendations meet the goal of requiring no additional vehicles and would require only a modest increase in annual revenue-hours and operating costs. Page 1

KAT Transit Development Plan CORRADINO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 2