Objectives / Goals. 10:30-10:45 Break/Network

Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE F / Aerospace Propulsion and Power Technology

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

AF Hypersonic Vision

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

Experimental Testing of a Rotating Detonation Engine Coupled to Nozzles at Conditions Approaching Flight

Opportunities For Innovative Collaboration. Propulsion Directorate Propulsion & Power for the 21st Century Warfighter

SABRE FOR HYPERSONIC & SPACE ACCESS PLATFORMS

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Aerospace Propulsion and Power Technology FY 2012 OCO

Clean Sky Programme. JTI Workshop, Vienna 3 rd of February, Helmut Schwarze, Project Officer CSJU Andrzej Podsadowski, Project Officer CSJU

Design Rules and Issues with Respect to Rocket Based Combined Cycles

Solar Electric Propulsion Benefits for NASA and On-Orbit Satellite Servicing

UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO

Unlocking the Future of Hypersonic Flight and Space Access

Welcome to Aerospace Engineering

Dean Andreadis Pratt & Whitney Space Propulsion, Hypersonics, West Palm Beach, FL,

Centerwide System Level Procedure

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 24 R-1 Line #7

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2017 OCO. FY 2017 Base

Aviation S&T: Future Vertical Lift & JMR Tech Demonstrator

HYPERSONIC PROPULSION AT PRATT & WHITNEY OVERVIEW Richard R. Kazmar Pratt & Whitney Space Propulsion West Palm Beach, FL.

AMBR* Engine for Science Missions

Propulsion Controls and Diagnostics Research at NASA GRC Status Report

BAYLOR UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING. EGR 4347 Analysis and Design of Propulsion Systems Fall 2002 ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Aerospace Propulsion and Power Technology. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification

Rocketry, the student way

Air Platforms Community of Interest Update

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT CENTER WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE OHIO

RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET (R-2 Exhibit) June 2001

Air Force Operational Energy

DDG 51 Program. Sea, Air, Space Exposition Washington, DC 04 April Presented by: CAPT Casey Moton, USN DDG 51 Program Manager PMS 400D

FAA Aging Electrical Systems Research Program Update Prepared for: Aging Transport Systems Rulemaking Advisory Committee January 23, 2002

Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG)

Dave Bone. DREAM Project Coordinator

Design Rules and Issues with Respect to Rocket Based Combined Cycles

Manufacturing Implications within. new DODI (Dec 8, 2008) Summary for Industry. National Center For Advanced Technologies.

Test like you Train Train like you Fight

2019 SpaceX Hyperloop Pod Competition

On-Demand Mobility Electric Propulsion Roadmap

ARCHIVED REPORT. For data and forecasts on current programs please visit or call

F/A-18A/B/C/D Flight Control Computer Software Upgrade

Draft Results and Recommendations

PRINTING OF BMI WHEELS

Annual Report Summary Green Regional Aircraft (GRA) The Green Regional Aircraft ITD

Too Good to Throw Away Implementation Strategy

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item #10 Page 1 of 49

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA S COMBAT SUPPORT LOGISTICS AGENCY

Air Platforms Community of Interest Update

Man-Portable Tactical Power Report on Efforts

Solar-Wind Specific Request for Proposals

Designing evtol for the Mission NDARC NASA Design and Analysis of Rotorcraft. Wayne Johnson From VTOL to evtol Workshop May 24, 2018

Flight and Terminal Ballistic Performance Demonstration of a Gun-Launched Medium Caliber Ramjet Propelled Air Defense Projectile

Climate change challenge

Energy Performance Information Request Timeline

Environmental issues for a supersonic business jet

Army Ground Vehicle Use of CFD and Challenges

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018

PM Light Tactical Vehicles

Changed Product Rule

La Propulsione nei futuri sistemi di trasporto aerospaziale. Raffaele Savino Università di Napoli Federico II

A Near Term Reusable Launch Vehicle Strategy

Methodology for Distributed Electric Propulsion Aircraft Control Development with Simulation and Flight Demonstration

UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED

Development of a Low Cost Suborbital Rocket for Small Satellite Testing and In-Space Experiments

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP)

Statement of Jim Schoppenhorst, Director, DD(X) BAE Systems / Armament Systems Division. Before the

Design and evaluate vehicle architectures to reach the best trade-off between performance, range and comfort. Unrestricted.

AFRL Rocket Lab Technical Overview

TARDEC OVERVIEW. Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center. APTAC Spring Conference Detroit 27 March, 2007

Massachusetts Space Grant Consortium

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item #22 Page 1 of 39

In this lecture... Components of ramjets and pulsejets Ramjet combustors Types of pulsejets: valved and valveless, Pulse detonation engines

UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base

Noise and Noise Reduction in Supersonic Jets

Development of Japan s Next Flagship Launch Vehicle

Consideration of LENR for Aircraft Propulsion (15ATC-0399) Session ATC502 - Business/Economics - Future Propulsion Technology

Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion

K. P. J. Reddy Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore , India.

Naval Architecture and Engineering Department, (Code 80)

Lockheed SR-71B ( / NASA 831) Flight Log

MS1-A Military Spaceplane System and Space Maneuver Vehicle. Lt Col Ken Verderame Air Force Research Laboratory 27 October 1999

Innovation Takes Off. Not legally binding

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Army Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #130

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS GREEN FLEET POLICY

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

Modern Approach to Liquid Rocket Engine Development for Microsatellite Launchers

Future NASA Power Technologies for Space and Aero Propulsion Applications. Presented to. Workshop on Reforming Electrical Energy Systems Curriculum

PATH Integrated Railcar and Signal System Replacement Program

Missouri S&T Hydrogen Transportation Test Bed

Supersonic Combustion Experimental Investigation at T2 Hypersonic Shock Tunnel

F135 Propulsion Integration Topics for Symposium on Jet Engines Haifa, Israel

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE E: ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS

REQUEST FOR QUOTATIONS

ESF on Fire Protection Proposed ESF on Fire Protection Engine attachment points applicable to Piston Engines EASA

AEROSPACE TEST OPERATIONS

Aerospace Propulsion Systems

CONCEPT STUDY OF AN ARES HYBRID-OS LAUNCH SYSTEM

Flow Controlled Core Overview

Transcription:

VULCAN Industry Day Agenda June 10, 2008 8:00-8:30 Registration open 8:30-9:00 Welcome Dr. Tom Bussing (and Steve Welby) Agenda Rvw/Today s intent DARPA/TTO s Charter.. 9:00-9:30 Hypersonic Vehicle Challenges (Dr. Steve Walker) 9:30-10:30 VULCAN Overview (Dr. Tom Bussing) Program Vision 10:30-10:45 Break/Network Objectives / Goals 10:45-11:15 PDE Consortium (Dr. Joe Doychak presented by Fred Schauer) 11:15-11:45 AFRL Technology Brief (Dr. Fred Schauer) 11:45 12:15 Catered Lunch 12:15-12:45 Questions & Answer Session 12:45-1:15 NAVY PDE Technology (Dr. Chris Brophy) 1:15-1:45 NASA PDE Technology (Dr. Dan Paxson) 1:45-2:00 Break/Network 2:00-2:20 Acquisition Strategy (Dr. Tom Bussing) Program Plan, outputs, schedule & events Near term program events (source selection schedule) 2:20-2:40 BAA Description / Proposal Overview (Stephen Davis/DARPA/CMO) 2:40-2:50 DARPA Security (David Selby/DARPA/TTO) 3:00-6:00 Side Bar Meetings with Tom @ 30 minutes each

Air-Breathing Hypersonics Historical Perspective Studies and Ground Tests Flight Aerospace Plane HRE Ramjet ASALM X-24C NHRF HST National Aerospace Plane (NASP) RCCFD X-43B X-43C Scramjet X-43A Hyper-X National Aerospace Initiative (NAI) X-43D HYFLITE-lll X-51 SED ARRMD HyFly DCR 960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Calendar Year 2010

Falcon - Hypersonics Program Goals and Objectives Demonstrate key Hypersonic Cruise Vehicle Technologies in-flight through a series of Hypersonic Technology Vehicles (HTVs) HTV-1 HTV-2 HTV-3X HCV Ground Demonstrations Technical Approach Aero-Thermal Dynamics First Flight - May 2009 High-Temperature Materials & Structures Navigation Guidance and Control Communications through Plasma Combined Cycle Propulsion Conceptual Design/ Risk Reduction Military Utility Prompt Global Reach from CONUS Reconnaissance Anti-access capability Reusable Space Access Aircraft-like operations Demonstrating Long-Duration Hypersonic Flight Vision Vehicle

Falcon HTV-3X Flight Demonstration Vehicle Hot Metallic Control Surfaces CG / Fuel Control out to Mach 6 Single Fuel (JP-7) for All Propulsion Stored Energy APU for Power After TJ Shutdown Have Blue HTV-3X D-21 (60% F-117) Hot/Warm Metallic Primary Structure Hot Metallic Leading Edges Integrated Dual Turbo- Ramjet SERN Nozzle Low Transonic Drag High Hypersonic L/D Waverider Integrated Inward Turning Turbo- Ramjet Inlet Over-Under Combined Cycle Propulsion Engines Regen Cooled Flight Weight DMRJ, TJ & Airframe Nozzle Flight Demo Firsts Demonstrated Technologies

Turbine-Based Combined Cycle Technology Challenges Technology 1 Common Inlet System Inlet Starting (Turbojet through DMRJ Transition) Inlet Performance / Operability Technology 3 Common Nozzle System Turbojet Effluent Integration Technology 2 Dual Mode Ramjet Combustor (DMRJ) Combustion Performance Combustor Operability (Low Q Flight) Structural Concept Flt Weight, Efficient Structural Concept Technology 4 Mach 4 Turbine Engine Thrust per unit frontal area (lbf/ft2) High Turbine Entrance Temp High Temperature Bearings High Mach Thermal Mgmt Installation Effects Scaling; Reusability & Life Hot Shutdown / Cocooning / Restart

Air-Breathing Hypersonics Flight Tests to Date 8000 6000 Turbojets Hydrogen Fuel Cryogenic storage Larger volume Easier ignition I sp Specific Impulse (seconds) 4000 2000 HCV Turbojets Falcon HTV-3X Rockets Ramjets X-43A X-43A Ramjets ASALM Scramjets Scramjets Hydrocarbon Fuel Easier to handle Smaller volume Harder to ignite Flight Test Notional 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Mach Number

Falcon HTV-3X DARPA- Hard, But not NASP 450 400 Altitude (kft) 350 300 250 200 150 Shuttle Ascent Descent Air-Breathing Vehicle Corridor 100 50 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Flight Velocity (kft/sec) or Approx Mach Number NASP

Blackswift Hypersonic Testbed Solicitation Schedule & Program Plan Solicitation Schedule: DARPA requests contract proposals to design, build, and fly Mach 6+ re- usable, air-breathing hypersonic, turbine-based based combined-cycle cycle hydrocarbon-fuel demo aircraft March 3, 2008 solicitation release to Federal Business Opportunities May 19, 2008 proposals due 4Q FY08 contract award and announcement Program Plan: SRR Systems Requirements Review PDR Preliminary Design Review CDR Critical Design Review Aggressive schedule and cost goals demand OTS High Mach Turbine

March Toward Hypersonic Capability Blackswift Bridges the Gap TECHNOLOGY READINESS UTILITY 1960 2007 X-51 HWTS Hot Structure HyFly HRE-SCRAMJET X-43A (NASP) X-15/HRE ASALM Fully Integrated system + Vulcan Hypersonic Atmospheric Flight and Access to Space Analysis & Ground Test Flight Test Air Launch Rocket Boost Powered T/O, Flight, & Land Operational Capability

Introduction Thomas Bussing DARPA/TTO thomas.bussing@darpa.mil (571) 218-4212 Presented to: Industry Performers June 10, 2008 VULCAN Full Scale Hypersonic Vehicle ENABLER The VULCAN Engine Demonstration Program Industry Day Briefing

VULCAN Engine Program Objective VULCAN is a propulsion system demonstration program to design, build and ground test an engine capable of accelerating a full scale hypersonic vehicle from rest to Mach 4+. The VULCAN engine will consist of an integrated Constant Volume Combustion (CVC) engine and a full scale turbine engine. CVC engine architectures, could include Pulsed Detonation Engines (PDE s), Continuous Detonation Engines (CDE s) or other unsteady CVC engine architectures. The CVC engine would operate from below the upper Mach limit of the turbine engine to Mach 4+. The turbine engine will be a current production engine capable of operating above Mach 2 and may be based on any of the following engines, the F100-229, F110-129, F119 or F414 engines. A key objective of the program is to integrate the turbine engine into the VULCAN engine with minimal modification to the turbine engine, to operate the turbine engine from rest to its upper Mach limit and to cocoon the turbine engine when it is not in use. It desired that both the turbine and the CVC engines share a common inlet and nozzle. It is envisioned that developing the VULCAN engine will enable full scale hypersonic cruise vehicles for intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, strike or other critical national missions.

What VULCAN Is 1. A Mach 0 to 4+ engine design, development and demonstration program 2. An unsteady Constant Volume Combustion (CVC) design, development and demonstration program 3. A full scale turbine and CVC integration program 4. A full scale turbine/cvc engine demonstration program at representative Mach and altitude conditions

What VULCAN Is Not 1. A high Mach turbine engine development program - DARPA s goal is to develop a high Mach engine around a production Mach 2+ turbine 2. A VULCAN/Scramjet engine development program, only Mach 0-4+

History High Mach Engine Development

High Mach Full Scale Airbreathing Engine Development History Goal/Advantages Issues TJ/CVC (Vulcan) -Mach 4+ -Use production turbine engine unmodified -Development cost small fraction of all new turbine -CVC development -TJ/CVC mode transition -Cocooning turbine TJ/CVC Vulcan Future -CVC 20-30% higher average SFC than ramjet -CVC s can operate from Mach 0-4+ RTA NASA Program stopped in 2005 Low level funding under ADVENT -Mach 4+ -Develop all new high Mach turbine/ramjet engine -All new turbo machinery, high development cost -TMS, seals, lubrication remain challenges RTA -Cocooning turbine J58 Powered SR-71 -Mach 3.2 Past TJ/CVC engine designed to meet full scale hypersonic vehicle need

CVC Background

Current State of the Art in Aviation Propulsion and Power Generation The Brayton Cycle Conventional aviation engines Turbofan Turbojet Ramjet Conventional power generation engines Ground Based Power Turbine Ground Based Power Diesel All conventional aviation and ground based power generation engines are based on constant pressure combustion i.e. the Brayton Cycle

How Can We Do Better Than A Brayton Cycle? Answer The Humphrey Cycle Humphrey (CVC) Cycle offers significant performance improvement over the Brayton Cycle A game changer!

Basic Operation Of The Classical PDE Cycle How the PDE Works NPGS architecture Cycle repeated up to 40 to 80 times per second Simple basic cycle, implementation technically very challenging

Thermal Efficiency Comparison Humphrey vs. Brayton State of the art: Current R&D efforts focused on Brayton Cycle improvements, only very small improvements possible Innovation: A Humphrey or Pulse Detonation Constant Volume Combustor (CVC) Cycle offers a novel way to achieve game changing performance improvements Thermal Efficiency 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 9-10% higher PDC-bas ed hybrid engine Brayton 0 10 20 30 40 Compres s ion ratio The ideal CVC Cycle thermal efficiency is 9-10% higher than the Brayton Cycle (CR =17), translating to an ideal SFC improvement of 30-35% - A game changer! Carnot Thermal Efficiency 77% (Eff TF = 1 T o /T m ) A compression ratio of 17 is equivalent to the stagnation pressure ratio at Mach 2.5

Government/Industry CVC Performance Baseline - Consensus Agreement - Assumptions: no mechanical compression, JP-10, phi = 1, mil spec inlet, 6% valve loss, 100% reaction ratio, back-pressured Chart may be requested from Dr Thomas Bussing by sending an email to BAA-08-53@darpa.mil Heiser & Pratt PDE Comparative ramjet performance 19% Isp improvement relative to a Ramjet at Mach 4

CVC Operation Demonstrated Over A Range Of Mach Numbers - Experimental Validation Specific Impulse (sec) 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 High Bypass Turbofan Turbofan/jet AFRL experimentally measured HC PDE Test Data Corrected To Flight Predicted Flight Performance 2000 PDE Ramjet Scramjet 1000 0 0 2 4 6 Flight Mach Number 8 Experimental data indicates high speed CVC engine possible with a Significant Specific Impulse advantage over a Ramjet over the Mach Range of Interest

State of the Art In CVC Development CVC Rig Videos ASI/P&W AFRL GE Proof of concept rig tests have shown the promise of the PDCVC Cycle

High Mach TJ/CVC Based Engine Applications

High Speed Cruise Vehicles Mach Number 0 4+ VULCAN Engine Powered Applications include high speed, long range reconnaissance and strike Key Technology Challenges Gas Turbine and CVC operating together over Gas Turbine operating Mach range CVC only above Gas Turbine Mach number operating range Thermal Management System Light Weight/High Temperature Materials CVC Flowpath Development CVC Low Mach Technologies CVC High Mach Technologies Full Variable Geometry Actuation High Temp Dynamic/Static Seals High Temp Fuel Delivery Systems Inlet and Nozzle Flowpath Integration

Hypersonic Cruise Vehicles Mach Number 0 6+ VULCAN Engine and Scramjet Engine Concept Annular VULCAN Engine Scramjet Engine Key Technology Challenges Gas Turbine and CVC operating CVC Low Mach Technologies together over Gas Turbine operating Mach range CVC High Mach Technologies Inlet mass flow matching amongst engine cycles Full Variable Geometry Actuation CVC only above Gas Turbine Mach number High Temp Dynamic/Static Seals operating range High Temp Fuel Delivery Systems Thermal Management System Inlet and Nozzle Flowpath Integration Light Weight/High Temperature Materials CVC Flowpath Development

Access to Space Notional VULCAN Engine and Scramjet Engine Concept Key technology challenges are similar to High Speed Cruise Vehicles except broader operating ranges and cryogenic fuel use must also be considered. Key Technology Challenges (similar to Mach 0-6 case) 0-6 Case Challenges VULCAN Engine to Scramjet Mode Transition Thermal Management System Light Weight/High Temperature Materials Cooled Leading Edges Scramjet Flowpath Development VULCAN Engine High Mach Technologies Full Variable Geometry Actuation High Temp Dynamic/Static Seals High Temp Fuel Delivery Systems Inlet/Nozzle Flowpath Integration

Possible VULCAN Engine Architecture

Possible VULCAN Transformational CVC Architectures Concept # 1 Concept # 2 Continuous Detonation Engine (CDE) Pulse Detonation Engines (PDE) Single detonation wave propagating continuously Classical PDE Configurations Characterized by discrete detonation events Valved, unvaled, moving combustors Concept # 3 Concept # 4 Other Unsteady CVC Other? Mechanical concepts not involving detonation waves Several novel revolutionary CVC concepts identified

Notional VULCAN Engine Cross Section Architectures TJ CVC VULCAN Engine Concept 1 Dual Flow Path VULCAN Engine Common inlet and nozzle separate engine flow paths VULCAN Engine TJ CVC Concept 2 Annular Vulcan Engine Common inlet and nozzle annular engine flow paths

Notional Combined Cycle VULCAN/Scramjet Engine Architectures TJ VULCAN/Scramjet Engine VULCAN Engine Scramjet CVC Concept 1 Dual Flow Path VULCAN Engine Common inlet and nozzle - 3 separate engine flow paths VULCAN Engine TJ/CVC Scramjet VULCAN/Scramjet Engine Concept 2 Annular Vulcan Engine Common inlet and nozzle - 3 engine flow paths

Top Level VULCAN Engine Programmatics

Full Scale Hypersonic Vehicle Engine Development Path Vulcan Program Flight Ready Vulcan/DMRJ Engine Development Program Demonstration Vulcan Engine Development Program 1) CVC Single combustor risk retirement 2) CVC Full scale valve, combustor subset risk retirement 3) CVC full scale test at representative flight conditions 4) TJ Purchase (GFE) 5) TJ Cocooning development and test 6) TJ Thermal hardening 7) TJ Nozzle re-design 8) TJ/CVC integration 9) TJ/CVC integrated inlet development and test 10)TJ/CVC Integrated nozzle development and test 11)Vulcan engine tested at representative flight conditions 12)Full scale DMRJ development and test 13)TJ/CVC/DMRJ integration 14)TJ/CVC/DMRJ integrated inlet development and test 15)TJ/CVC/DMRJ integrated nozzle development and test 16)TJ/CVC/DMRJ test at representative flight conditions 1) CVC Single combustor risk retirement 2) CVC Full scale valve, combustor subset risk retirement 3) CVC full scale test at representative flight conditions 4) F119, F110-129, F100-229 or F414 Purchase 5) TJ Cocooning development 8) TJ/CVC integration 9) TJ/CVC integrated inlet required for demonstration 10)TJ/CVC Integrated nozzle required for demonstration 11)Vulcan engine tested at representative flight conditions Vulcan Program Focused on Key Technology Challenges

Notional VULCAN Engine Program Schedule and Milestones April 08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 BAA Phase 2 CVC Component Demo (~18 Mo) Phase 3 CVC Demo (~18 Mo) Phase 4 TJ-CVC Demo (~18 Mo) Phase 1 TJ/CVC Concept Definition (6 Mo) Trades, Prelim. Designs, Sims Components Dev, Tests Combustors Valves Nozzles Materials Seals TMS CVC Air Metering system CVC Nozzle System TJ/CVC Air Metering system TJ/CVC Nozzle System Detailed CVC Designs & Sims CVC engine Design, Dev, Tests Valve/Combustor/Nozzle TMS Control System Performance Measurement Hardware Multi-Combustor Interaction Multi-Combustor Mechanical Design Integrated Inlet Integrated Nozzle Design, Fabrication, Assembly, Test CoDR Go/no Go PDR CDR Go/no Go PDR CDR Go/no Go $3M per Performer $TBDM $TBDM $TBDM Program structured with clear Go/No Go criteria

Notional Vehicle Mach Number vs. Altitude and Mach Number vs. Uninstalled Thrust Mach Number 0 0 Altitude (ft) 1 Mach Number Turbojet Uninstalled Thrust (lb) CVC Uninstalled Thrust (lb) Combined Uninstalled Thrust (lb) 0 80,000 0 80,000 1.5 20,530 1.5 80,000 10,000 90,000 2 34,000 3 50,490 4 62,540 2 60,000 10,000 70,000 3 cocooned 50,000 50,000 4 cocooned 50,000 50,000 1 Trajectory based on maintaining a Q of 1,500 lb/ft 2 2 Turbojet thrust total for the vehicle 3 Turbojet thrust will vary with turbojet lapse rate

VULCAN Engine Programmatics Details in Afternoon Session

Notional Vulcan Program Requirements Non-Tradable Requirements Integrated turbine engine and Constant Volume Combustion (CVC) engine that must operate from 0 -- Mach 4+ Full scale production turbine for the Vulcan engine as stated in the BAA with minimal modification CVC engine must be able to operate on fuel qualified for the turbine engine and must at least be capable of throttling between half and full power Integrated flow path switching inlet and nozzle design capable of: Demonstrating in three modes with continuous operation between Mach 0 to 4+: Turbine only, Turbine & CVC engine, and CVC engine only Demonstrating an efficient combined inlet and nozzle architectures System Level Attributes Propulsion system for hypersonic cruise vehicle for the following missions: Intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance Space access Strike Tradable Goals CVC engine can be Pulse Detonation Engine (PDE) or Continuous Detonation Engine (CDE) or unsteady constant volume combustion engine F100-229, F110-129, F414 or F119 class

Notional Vulcan Phase I Program Plan Phase I Concept Definition Objectives Develop a critical technology development plan for follow on phase Refine the point of departure to fulfill system requirements Develop Vulcan system and flow down requirements Develop engine propulsion performance model Deliver a phase II proposal update Programmatics/Deliverables 3 rd month after award: Initial design refinement 6 th month after award: Propulsion System Conceptual Design (CoDR)/System Requirements Review (SRR) Phase II Critical Technology Development Plan Engine performance model Vulcan Models 4 sets of SLA models and Vulcan conceptual operation computer animation 7 th month after award: Phase II technical and cost proposal update at WBS level 4 8 th month after award: Final Report Criteria for Following Phase Feasible design that meets DARPA DIRO G/NG Credible Phase II technical development plan

Notional Vulcan Phase II Program Plan Phase II Component and Subsystem Demonstration Objectives Progressively mature design and technology required to validate program performance goals Component and subsystem risk reduction testing and design trades Updated engine performance model simulation Preliminary Design Review (PDR) of CVC and inlet/nozzle configuration Programmatics ~18 months duration Risk reduction testing complete for all components and subsystems at full scale to include: combustors, valves, nozzles, materials, seals, TMS, TJ-CVC & CVC air metering & nozzle systems and others identified Phase III proposal update to WBS level 4 details Deliverable Quarterly Program Management Reviews (PMRs) Interim CVC design review and Final PDR Components test plans and reports Propulsion performance predictions An updated Phase III technical and cost proposal to WBS level 4 Criteria for Following Phase Meeting the technical objectives and DARPA DIRO G/NG Availability of funds

Notional Vulcan Phase III Program Plan Potential Phase III - CVC Demonstration Objective Progressively mature design and technology required to validate program performance goals Detail Design, fabrication and successfully demonstration of full scale CVC engine, flow path switching inlet and nozzle Continue risk reduction testing activities Validate performance capabilities of the CVC Preliminary Design Review of the Vulcan System: Turbine, CVC, inlet and nozzle Programmatics ~ 18 months duration CVC Critical Design Review (CDR) Successful full scale CVC Demonstration (w/flow path switching mechanism for inlet and nozzle) Vulcan PDR Phase IV proposal update to WBS level 4 details Deliverable Quarterly PMRs Interim Vulcan design review and final Vulcan PDR Test plans and reports Propulsion performance predictions An updated Phase IV technical and cost proposal to WBS level 4 Criteria for following phase Meeting the technical objectives and DARPA DIRO G/NG Availability of funds

Notional Vulcan Phase IV Program Plan Potential Phase IV TJ-CVC Demonstration Objective Progressively mature design and technology required to validate program performance goals Detail design of the Vulcan System (full turbine + CVC propulsion module) Fabricate and Integrate a full scale CVC engine with a turbine engine Full scale demonstration of all 3 operating modes including flow path switching inlets and nozzle Validate performance predicted in previous phases Programmatics ~18 months Vulcan CDR Successful integrated propulsion system demonstration direct connect configuration Deliverable Quarterly PMRs Interim Vulcan Design Review and Final CDR Test plans and reports Propulsion performance predictions

Notional Acquisition Overview BAA Response Anticipated to Include: Ability to meet program Go/No-Go metrics Overall Scientific and Technical Approach Technical innovativeness Point of Departure Design Feasibility/Substantiation Development plan Trade study and analysis plan Risk management plan Statement of work Integrated master schedule Potential Contribution and Relevance to the DARPA Mission Management and Program Team Program team Management construct/corporate capabilities Intellectual Property Cost Completeness Substantiations Program risk (reasonableness)

Notional Program Schedule Start Finish FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 Task/Phase Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY13 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Industry Day Brief BAA Released Proposals Due BAA Negotiations Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV 06/10/08 06/30/08 08/11/08 10/06/08 11/2008 07/2009 02/2011 4QFY12 11/06/08 06/2009 01/2011 08/2012 2QFY14 Blow up on next page Phase I -- Conceptual Definition (6+1+1 Month) Phase II CVC Component Demo (18 months) Phase III CVC Demo (18 Months) Phase IV -- TJ-CVC Demo (~ 20 Months)

Tentative Term Acquisition Schedule Apr 08 May 08 Jun 08 Jul 08 Aug 08 Sep 08 Oct 08 Nov 08 Dec 08 Jan 09 DIRO Approval Process Industry Day Draft Solicitation BAA Approval Cycle BAA Release Proposal Due EVAL SSEB/ SSA Briefs Negotiate Award for Conceptual Definition Phase

Tentative Acquisition Schedule Industry Day 10 June 2008 BAA Release 30 June 2008 Proposals Due 11 Aug 2008 Evaluation Complete 29 Sep 2008 Negotiations & Awards Oct 2008 http://www.darpa.mil/tto/solicitations.htm Questions submit to: BAA08-53@darpa.mil

BAA Process DARPA/CMO

BAA PROCESS Solicitation is released utilizing Broad Agency Announcement procedures IAW FAR 35.016 BAA and any amendments posted in FEDBIZOPPS BAA covers all info needed to propose BAA allows for a variety of technical solutions Individual Proposals evaluated in accordance with the BAA and not evaluated against each other Funding Instruments will be Procurement Contracts and/or Other Transaction Agreements. Grants and Cooperative Agreements will not be available under this solicitation. Following the proposal instructions assists the evaluation team to clearly understand what is being proposed and supports a timely negotiation.

BAA PROCESS NOTE: Organizational Conflict of Interest & Procurement Integrity language Central Contractor Registration (CCR), Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA), & Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) Subcontracting Plan Requirements Include detailed cost breakdown for subs whose costs are, or exceed, 10% of total proposed price Data Rights Assertions - Assert rights to all technical data & computer software generated, developed, and/or delivered to which the Government will receive less than Unlimited Rights Assertions for Prime and Subs Justify Basis of Assertion This information is assessed during evaluations

BAA PROCESS EVALUATION/AWARD Government reserves the right to select for award all, some, or none of the proposals received and to award without discussions Government anticipates making multiple awards No common Statement of Work - Proposals evaluated on individual merit and relevance as it relates to the stated research goals/objectives rather than against each other Only a duly authorized Contracting Officer may obligate the Government

BAA PROCESS COMMUNICATIONS From now to receipt of proposals No restrictions, however, Gov t (PM) shall not dictate solutions or transfer technology After Receipt of Proposals Government (PM/PCO) may communicate with offerors in order to seek clarification, obtain confirmation or substantiate a proposed approach, solution, or cost estimate Informal feedback may be provided once selection(s) are made