FACT SHEET. US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies. Alternative Description/Overview

Similar documents
Public Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

Streetcar and Light Rail Design Differences. March 2015

SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

PAWG Meeting #3a Tier 1 Evaluation

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

PUBLIC TRANSPORT MODAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ROLES

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

What IS BRT, Really? Not BRT and RNY

East Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project. Downtown Oakland to San Leandro International Blvd to East 14 th St

WELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops

Appendix G: Rapid Transit Technology Backgrounder July 2017

Tier 2 Screening and Selection522. of the Short List Alternatives KISSIMMEE CORRIDOR. Downtown CRA. US 192 Alternatives Analysis

Streetcar and Light Rail Design Differences. February 2015

I-20 EAST TRANSIT INITIATIVE Tier 1 and Tier 2 Alternatives Screening Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Initial Screening Analysis

Bus Rapid Transit: Basic Design for Non-Transit Planners

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Capital Cost Estimation Methodology and Assumptions

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

Van Ness Transit Corridor Improvement Project. Engineering, Maintenance and Safety Committee March 25, 2015

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Key Issues Memo

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

Bus Rapid Transit. Jennifer Flynn and Cheryl Thole Senior Research Associates Commuter Choice Workshop January 2012 Tampa, FL

6.0 Transit Technology Assessment

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

4 Evaluation Process and Initial Alternatives Considered

RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE REPORT

Transit on the New NY Bridge

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

1.0 Detailed Definition of Alternatives

Tier 3 Screening and Selection. of the Recommended Alternative KISSIMMEE CORRIDOR. June Downtown CRA. US 192 Alternatives Analysis

What is the Connector?

BY NUH AKBAR.

Table 8-1: Service Frequencies for All Short-List Alternatives by Day of Week and Time of Day Frequency Day of Week Time of Day Time Period

NORTHEAST CORRIDOR MOBILITY STUDY DRAFT UNIVERSE OF ALTERNATIVES DEFINITION AND EVALUATION

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Streetcar Level Boarding Background Memo

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study

Recommendation for 2017 PSRC Funding Transportation Policy Board - June 8, 2017

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Technology Evaluation Scorecard Suitability

Station Evaluation. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project Spring 2012

Where will. BRT run? BRT will serve 20 stations along the line, connecting to bus routes and serving major destinations. How often will service run?

BRT: What is it & Where Does it Fit? Sam Zimmerman

Honolulu Rail Transit Project Light Rail vs. Honolulu Light Metro. Harvey L. Berliner Infraconsult / HDR

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

ARTERIAL BRT OVERVIEW

Informal Business Discussion Minutes Tuesday, May 3, :00 PM 1. Transportation

An Overview of Rapid Transit Typical Characteristics. Date April 30, 2009

BYD SkyRail Elevate Your Commute, Elevate Your Life

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

Stittsville OC Transpo Services

DEFINITIONS OF TRANSIT SYSTEMS TERMS

Three ULTra Case Studies examples of the performance of the system in three different environments

engineering phase and during the procurement of design build contracts.

The range of alternatives has been reviewed with the RTAC Subgroup and the preliminary analysis is proceeding on the following HCT alternatives:

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013

VAN NESS AVENUE BUS RAPID TRANSIT

Safer Swifter Better Leadrail Infra Solutions Pvt. Ltd. / INDIA

MicroRail Alternate to Light Rail

Detailed Definition of Alternatives

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. Information Session, October 10, 2017

Feasibility of BEB s and Designing the Electric Road Map

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

TRANSIT IDEA STRATEGIC INITIATIVE On BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT)

GA Electromagnetic Projects. Maglev and Linear Motors for Goods Movement. California-Nevada. FTA Urban Maglev. High-Speed Maglev

TRANSIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW MPO TRANSIT STUDY

MyCiTi. Changing the way Cape Town travels

OVERVIEW ENVIRONMENTS. Structures

Bus Rapid Transit. Briefing. Common to all BRT schemes is the aim to improve passengers experience and percep on of public transport

Needs and Community Characteristics

Opportunities for Improved Bus Service on Finch Avenue 27 April 2011

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

Attachment 5. High Speed Transit Planning Study REPORT SUMMARY. Prepared by: City of Edmonton Transportation Planning Branch. Stantec Consulting Ltd.

Toolbox Transit Presentation Professors Joseph DiJohn and Siim Sööt University of Illinois at Chicago

Brian Pessaro, AICP National Bus Rapid Transit Institute

The MAGLEV 2000 Urban Transit System

Memorandum. 1 Introduction. 2 O&M Cost Elements. 2.1 Service O&M Costs

ALIGN THE RAPID S TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT STUDY. Tech Memo #4: Phase 1 Project List. Prepared By:

Light rail, Is New Zealand Ready for Light Rail? What is Needed in Terms of Patronage, Density and Urban Form.

Electric buses Solutions portfolio

Key Transfer Stations - Technical Memo

Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study. January 7, 2015

HDR Engineering. HART North / South. Tampa Bay Applications Group Meeting May 14, 2009

Capital Needs Assessment Riders Advisory Council July2, 2008

What is Project Connect?

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

PAWG Meeting #2. May 17, 2017 LYNX Central Station Open Area

Click to edit Master title style

Locally Preferred Alternative Report

VAN NESS AVENUE BUS RAPID TRANSIT

Transcription:

FACT SHEET US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies Bus Alternative Description/Overview Bus systems typically operate in mixed traffic and have minimal station infrastructure. Bus service typically operates every 10 60 minutes. Bus stop spacing is typically 1/4 to 1/2 mile apart. Bus systems are in operation in multiple locations around North America. Multiple vendors provide this technology. Future expansion or modification of a bus system would be simple and would not require substantial investment in guideways, propulsions or stations. Vehicle Description Bus routes can operate using either standard or articulated buses. Vehicles are typically diesel propelled, but can also be powered using compressed natural gas, hybrid electric, diesel or biodiesel. Bus vehicles typically have low floors, and if they are articulated have three doors. Vehicle Example Facts at a Glance Propulsion: Diesel/Compressed Natural Gas/Bio diesel/hybrid Electric Capacity: 50 passengers (standard vehicle), 80 passengers (articulated vehicle) Vehicle Length: 40 feet long (standard vehicle), 62 feet long (articulated vehicle) Maximum Speed: 60 MPH Bus 1

Fact Sheet: Modal Technologies Infrastructure Required to Support this Alternative Space to maintain and store the vehicles would be required for service. Locating this facility near the operating routes is not required, but it is desirable in order to minimize operating costs. If compressed natural gas vehicle are used, a specialized fueling facility would be required. Station Infrastructure Bus stations are typically minimal in their design. Most stations include signs identifying the stop and listing the routes served. 2 Bus

FACT SHEET US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Alternative Description/Overview BRT uses a variety of infrastructure and technological improvements to improve the travel time and reliability of bus service. These infrastructure improvements could include exclusive running ways, queue jumps and/or transit signal priority at intersections. BRT stop spacing is typically less than normal bus service (1/2 to 1 mile apart). BRT is in operation in multiple locations around North America. Multiple vendors provide this technology. Future expansion or modification of BRT would be simple and would not require substantial investment in guideways, propulsions or stations. Vehicle Description BRT routes can operate using either standard or articulated buses. Vehicles are typically diesel propelled, but can also be powered using compressed natural gas, hybrid-electric, diesel or biodiesel. In order to differentiate BRT service from standard bus service, vehicles typically have a different look, including special wraps, interiors and design. In order to speed boarding and improve accessibility, BRT vehicles typically have low-floors, and have three doors if they are articulated. BRT 1

Fact Sheet: Modal Technologies Vehicle Example Facts at a Glance Propulsion: Diesel/Compressed Natural Gas/Bio-diesel/Hybrid-Electric Capacity: 50 passengers (standard vehicle), 80 passengers (articulated vehicle) Vehicle Length: 40 feet long (standard vehicle), 62 feet long (articulated vehicle) Maximum Speed: 60 MPH Infrastructure Required to Support this Alternative A Bus Rapid Transit system would require space to maintain and store the vehicles required for service. Locating this space near the BRT alignment is not required, but it is desirable in order to minimize operating costs. If compressed natural gas vehicles are used, a specialized fueling facility would be required. BRT improvements can also include transit signal priority (TSP), which allows transit vehicles to receive preferential treatment at intersections. Depending on the complexity chosen, this technology could require TSP-enabled equipment at intersections, on vehicles, and at traffic management centers. Station Infrastructure BRT stations include elements to improve the overall travel experience for passengers and to provide a sense of permanence to the customer (and adjacent properties). Typically, they include sheltered waiting areas, next-bus enunciators, fare payment machinery and benches. Stations can also be constructed with curb extensions, bus pull-outs, and higher curbs (meeting the height of the bus floor), all of which can improve the overall customer experience. 2 BRT

FACT SHEET US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies Light Rail Transit (LRT) Alternative Description/Overview A Light Rail Transit (LRT) system would be best accommodated within an exclusive running way, but mixed traffic systems exist. LRT systems are typically comprised of 1 to 2 tracks for most of the alignment. LRT stop spacing is typically 1/2 to 1-mile apart. LRT is found in multiple locations around North America. Multiple vendors provide this technology. Future expansion/modification of LRT would have some cost but would not be entirely prohibitive. Vehicle Description LRT vehicles can either be diesel or electrically propelled. Other methods of propulsion such as battery and ground level powered vehicles are being installed/tested in various locations outside of the United States. LRT vehicles with high-floor and low-floors are available, although high-floor vehicles are becoming less common due to accessibility issues. LRT 1

Fact Sheet: Modal Technologies Vehicle Example Facts at a Glance Propulsion: Diesel/Electric Capacity: 200 passengers (per car). Typical train-set configurations range from 2-3 cars. Vehicle Length: Approximately 70 feet (per car) Maximum Speed: 65 MPH Infrastructure Required to Support this Alternative An LRT system would require space to store and maintain the vehicles. This facility would need to be connected to the tracks, and would ideally be located at the end of the line. If a dieselpropelled vehicle is chosen, fueling facilities would be required. Electrically propelled light rail vehicles require catenary poles and wire, and power substations. In some instances, LRT vehicles use train-control signals to keep trains safely spaced apart. LRT systems can also include transit signal priority (TSP), which allows the vehicle to receive preferential treatment at intersections when operating at grade. Depending on the complexity chosen, this technology could require TSP-enabled equipment at intersections, on vehicles, and at traffic management centers. Station Infrastructure LRT stations typically include sheltered waiting areas, next-train enunciators, fare payment machinery and benches. Depending on the type of vehicle, stations can either be high or lowplatform (depending on the vehicle type). 2 LRT

FACT SHEET US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies Streetcar Alternative Description/Overview Streetcar systems are most often accommodated in mixed traffic, although in some locations streetcars are operated in partial exclusive guideways. Streetcars are typically comprised of 1 to 2 tracks for most of the alignment. Streetcar stop spacing is typically every 1 to 2 blocks. It is assumed that a streetcar alternative would stop at or close to the existing bus stops along the corridor. Vehicle Description Streetcar vehicles are typically smaller than LRT vehicles, and have fewer doors. Streetcars can either be diesel or electrically propelled. Depending on the type of vehicle used, vehicles can either be a heritage or more modern fleet. Heritage fleets are typically high-floor vehicles and require either lifts or high level platforms for accessibility. Modern, low-floor fleets do not require this additional infrastructure. Streetcar 1

Fact Sheet: Modal Technologies Vehicle Example Facts at a Glance Propulsion: Diesel/Electric Capacity: 80 to 100 passengers per car. Typical train-set configuration consists of one car only. Vehicle Length: Approximately 50 feet Maximum Speed: 25 MPH Infrastructure Required to Support this Alternative A Streetcar system would require space to store and maintain the vehicles. This location would need to be connected to the tracks, and would ideally be located at the end of the line. If a diesel-propelled vehicle is chosen, fueling facilities would be required. Electrically propelled streetcar vehicles require catenary poles and wire, and power substations. Streetcars typically do not operate using train-control signals (the driver maintains a safe distance between vehicles by using line of sight ). Streetcar systems can also include transit signal priority (TSP), which allows transit vehicles to receive preferential treatment at intersections when operating at grade. Depending on the complexity chosen, this technology could require TSP enabled equipment at intersections, on vehicles, and at traffic management centers. Station Infrastructure Streetcar stations typically include minimal amenities, and at a minimum could consist of no more than a simple sign indicating where the vehicle stops. 2 Streetcar

FACT SHEET US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies Commuter Rail Alternative Description/Overview Commuter Rail would require an exclusive, fixed guideway typically single track with sections of double track for the entire length of its route. Commuter rail alignments are typically at-grade, though tunneled or elevated alignments do exist. Commuter Rail stop spacing is typically 2 to 10-miles apart. Commuter Rail is in operation in multiple locations around North America. Multiple vendors provide this technology. Future expansion/modification of Commuter Rail would require a substantial investment in guideways, propulsion and stations. Vehicle Description Commuter Rail systems can either be diesel or electrically propelled (overhead catenary wire or third rail). Commuter Rail vehicles typically operate in exclusive guideways and vehicles can have level boarding or low platforms. Vehicle Example Facts at a Glance Propulsion: Diesel/Electric Capacity: 100-200 passengers (per car). Typical train-set configurations range from 2-12 cars. Vehicle Length: ~85 feet (per vehicle) Maximum Speed: 65-79 MPH Commuter Rail 1

Fact Sheet: Modal Technologies Infrastructure Required to Support this Alternative A Commuter Rail system would require space to store and maintain the vehicles. This facility would need to be connected to the tracks, and would ideally be located at the end of the line. If a diesel-propelled vehicle is chosen, fueling facilities would be required. Electrically propelled vehicles would require catenary poles and wire, and power substations. Commuter Rail vehicles use train-control signals to keep trains safely spaced apart. Station Infrastructure Commuter Rail stations include elements to improve the overall travel experience for customers and to provide a sense of permanence to the customer (and adjacent properties). Typically, they include sheltered waiting areas, with space for fare payment machinery and waiting areas with benches. 2 Commuter Rail

FACT SHEET US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies Heavy Rail Alternative Description/Overview Heavy Rail would have to be accommodated within an exclusive, fixed guideway. Heavy Rail systems are typically two tracks in each direction and are typically elevated or in tunnel sections. Heavy Rail stop spacing is typically every 1 to 2 miles. Heavy Rail is in operation in a handful of highly urban locations around North America. Multiple vendors provide this technology. Future modification/expansion of Heavy Rail would require a substantial investment in guideways, propulsion and stations. Vehicle Description Heavy Rail vehicles are electrically propelled and powered by either third rail or overhead catenary wire. Heavy Rail vehicles are high-floor vehicles with multiple doors. Heavy Rail vehicles typically operate in a fixed guideway due to their speeds. Vehicle Example Facts at a Glance Propulsion: Electric Capacity: Approximately 150 passengers per car. Typical train-set configurations range from 4-10 cars. Vehicle Length: 60-75 feet (per car) Maximum Speed: 65 MPH Heavy Rail 1

Fact Sheet: Modal Technologies Infrastructure Required to Support this Alternative A Heavy Rail system would require space to store and maintain the vehicles. This facility would need to be connected to the tracks, and would ideally be located at the end of the line. Either catenary poles and wires or a third rail system, as well as electrical substations, would be required along the line to power the vehicles. A train-control signal system to keep trains spaced safely apart would also be required. Station Infrastructure Heavy Rail stations typically include sheltered waiting areas, next-train enunciators, fare payment machinery and benches. Heavy Rail stations would need to be elevated (due to the elevated guideway) and would require vertical circulation elements including elevators and overpasses. 2 Heavy Rail

FACT SHEET US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies Monorail Alternative Description/Overview Monorail systems are accommodated within an exclusive running way. Single beam monorails exist, but are mainly used for uni-directional operation. Two beams would be required for bidirectional operation. Monorail stop spacing is typically every 1/2 to 2 miles. Monorail is in use in the study area (at Walt Disney World) and is found at a handful of locations in North America. The number of vendors for Monorail technology is limited to a few proprietary companies. Future expansion/modification of a monorail would require a substantial investment in guideways, propulsion and stations. Vehicle Description Monorail vehicles are electrically propelled and slightly narrower than LRT/Heavy Rail Vehicles due to the width of their guideways. Vehicles have level boarding with station platforms. Monorail vehicles straddle a single guide-beam which provides vertical and horizontal support as well as traction power. Monorails must operate in an exclusive guideway due to their unique guide-beam. This beam is usually elevated on piers. Monorail 1

Fact Sheet: Modal Technologies Vehicle Example Facts at a Glance Propulsion: Electric Capacity: 40-60 passengers (per car). Typical train-set configurations range from 2-6 cars. Vehicle Length: 34 feet long (per car) Maximum Speed: 55 MPH Infrastructure Required to Support this Alternative A Monorail system would require space to maintain and store the vehicles required for service. This facility would need to be connected to the tracks and would ideally be located at the end of the line. Train signal infrastructure to control the movement of trains and substations for electrical power would also be required. Station Infrastructure Monorail stations must be elevated to access the guideway. They require elevators and other vertical passenger circulation elements to access the station platforms. Similar to other modal technologies, station platforms include sheltered waiting areas, next-train enunciators, and fare payment machinery. 2 Monorail

FACT SHEET US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies High Speed Rail Alternative Description/Overview High Speed Rail (HSR) is a type of passenger transport that operates significantly faster than traditional rail traffic. The U.S. Department of Transportation is currently working with various States to plan and develop high-speed and intercity passenger rail corridors that range from upgrading existing track and services to entirely new rail lines exclusively devoted to 150 to 220 mph trains. HSR alignments typically consist of two tracks and must be grade separated, which requires substantial infrastructure. HSR stations are typically spaced 10 miles apart or greater. High Speed Rail is operated in North America on Amtrak s Northeast Corridor. The number of vendors for High Speed Rail technology is limited. Future expansion/modification of a High Speed Rail would require a substantial investment in guideways, propulsion and stations. Vehicle Description High Speed Rail vehicles are electrically propelled. Vehicles must have level boarding. High Speed Rail vehicles typically operate in an exclusive guideway due to their speed. High Speed Rail 1

Fact Sheet: Modal Technologies Vehicle Example Facts at a Glance Propulsion: Electric Capacity: 70-80 passengers Vehicle Length: Varies Maximum Speed: 220+ mph Infrastructure Required to Support this Alternative A HSR system would require an exclusive running way for the entire length of its route. The alignment would be examined as part of the study and be based on the availability of right-ofway for the required tracks and other alignment features. HSR would require dedicated and significant stations and a train storage and maintenance facility. This facility would need to be connected to the tracks and would ideally be located at the end of the line. A HSR system would also require an electric traction power system and signal system. Station Infrastructure HSR stations include elements to improve the overall travel experience for customers and to provide a sense of permanence to the customer (and adjacent properties). Typically, they include sheltered waiting areas, with space for fare payment machinery and waiting areas with benches. 2 High Speed Rail

FACT SHEET US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies Maglev Alternative Description/Overview Maglev (or magnetic levitation) transport, is a form of transportation that suspends, guides and propels vehicles via electromagnetic force. A Maglev alternative would require a two track exclusive running way for the entire length of its route. Maglev alignments are typically elevated or tunneled, though at-grade alignments do exist. Maglev stations are typically spaced every 2 to 10 miles apart. There is no Maglev currently in operation in North America. There are a limited number of vendors which provide this proprietary technology. Future expansion/modification of Maglev would require a substantial investment in guideways, propulsion and stations. Vehicle Description Maglev vehicles are propelled using electromagnetic force. The levitation of the vehicle using magnetic forces helps to create a quiet and smooth ride, even at high speeds. Vehicles have level boarding with high level station platforms. Maglev vehicles straddle a single guide beam and operate in an exclusive guideway due to their high speeds. Maglev 1

Fact Sheet: Modal Technologies Vehicle Example Facts at a Glance Propulsion: Electromagnetic force Capacity: 220+ passengers Vehicle Length: Varies Maximum Speed: 300 mph Infrastructure Required to Support this Alternative A Maglev system would require an exclusive running way for the entire length of its route. The alignment would be examined as part of the study and be based on the availability of right-ofway for the required tracks and other alignment features. A Maglev system would require space to maintain and store the vehicles required for service. This facility would need to be connected to the Maglev alignment, ideally at the end of the line. Station Infrastructure Maglev stations include elements to improve the overall travel experience for customers and to provide a sense of permanence to the customer (and adjacent properties). Typically, they include sheltered waiting areas, with space for fare payment machinery and waiting areas with benches. Stations may be enclosed with sliding doors at the platform edges for passenger safety to prevent any person from entering the pathway of an oncoming vehicle. 2 Maglev