Basic hypothesis. Subjective position may give less Drag at high Mach number to the Typhoon and better Lift at high AoA (>20) for the Rafale.

Similar documents
Mc Donnell Douglas F-4D Blk.37 Phantom II (J79-GE-15)

Mc Donnell Douglas F-4E Blk.41 Phantom II (J79-GE-17)

Compared Air Combat Performances analysis Mig-21 versus F-5E

Compared Air Combat Performances analysis Mig-21 versus F-4 Phantom II Part 1

USAF Strike Fighters. An analysis of range, stamina, turning, and acceleration By Spurts

General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design Final Examination. Instructor: Prof. Dr. Serkan ÖZGEN Date:

Fuel Saving by Gradual Climb Procedure. Ryota Mori (Electronic Navigation Research Institute)

USAF Strike Fighters. An analysis of range, stamina, turning, and acceleration

AN ADVANCED COUNTER-ROTATING DISK WING AIRCRAFT CONCEPT Program Update. Presented to NIAC By Carl Grant November 9th, 1999

Flight Test Evaluation of C-130H Aircraft Performance with NP2000 Propellers

Welcome to Aerospace Engineering

Icing Wind Tunnel tests in the framework of a Wing Ice Protection system certification process

Reentry Demonstration Plan of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Vehicle using a Sounding Rocket

Lateral Directional Flight Considerations

North American F-86F Sabre USER MANUAL. Virtavia F-86F Sabre DTG Steam Edition Manual Version 1

Design Rules and Issues with Respect to Rocket Based Combined Cycles

Part 1 Aerodynamic Theory COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL

Hypersonic Wind Tunnel Test of Flare-type Membrane Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Capsule

Metrovick F2/4 Beryl. Turbo-Union RB199

Classical Aircraft Sizing I

A Game of Two: Airbus vs Boeing. The Big Guys. by Valerio Viti. Valerio Viti, AOE4984, Project #1, March 22nd, 2001

Welcome to the Airbus A380 Basic Manual for Virtual Air Cadet Airlines.

BAYLOR UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING. EGR 4347 Analysis and Design of Propulsion Systems Fall 2002 ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES

Canards. Evan Neblett Mike Metheny Leifur Thor Leifsson. AOE 4124 Configuration Aerodynamics Virginia Tech 17. March 2003

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF UNMANNED AIR VEHICLE INTERCEPTOR (UAV-Ip)

ATPL Workbook. ATPL Advanced Aerodynamics, Performance and Systems Knowledge (Aeroplane)

Appenidix E: Freewing MAE UAV analysis

Development of a Subscale Flight Testing Platform for a Generic Future Fighter

The Sonic Cruiser A Concept Analysis

Aircraft Design Conceptual Design

Boeing /-200/-200A Limitations

Deployment and Flight Test of Inflatable Membrane Aeroshell using Large Scientific Balloon

Review of. Eurofighter Typhoon. Developed by Just Flight

Dragon Eye. Jessica Walker Rich Stark Brian Squires. AOE 4124 Configuration Aerodynamics

In this lecture... Prof. Bhaskar Roy, Prof. A M Pradeep, Department of Aerospace, IIT Bombay

Approche novatrice pour la conception et l exploitation d avions écologiques, sous incertitudes.

Preface. Acknowledgments. List of Tables. Nomenclature: organizations. Nomenclature: acronyms. Nomenclature: main symbols. Nomenclature: Greek symbols

Weight Effects Part 1

AIRCRAFT FAMILIARIZATION. Some questions may not apply to the aircraft you are flying.

Deployment and Drop Test for Inflatable Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Capsule with using Large Scientific Balloon

Effect of ZFW / ZFWCG on Aircraft Operations

Propeller blade shapes

Eurofighter -Typhoon Entwicklungsprogramm. Peter Huber Chief Engineer Typhoon CASSIDIAN AS

DESIGN OF AN ARMAMENT WING FOR A LIGHT CATEGORY HELICOPTER

North American XB-70A Valkyrie USER MANUAL. Virtavia XB-70A Valkyrie DTG Steam Edition Manual Version 1

TURBOPROP ENGINE App. K AIAA AIRCRAFT ENGINE DESIGN

Performance means how fast will it go? How fast will it climb? How quickly it will take-off and land? How far it will go?

POWER ESTIMATION FOR FOUR SEATER HELICOPTER

Initial / Recurrent Ground Take-Home Self-Test: The Beechcraft 58 Baron Systems, Components and Procedures

Environmentally Focused Aircraft: Regional Aircraft Study

RFC Dallas, Inc. AIRCRAFT QUESTIONNAIRE (9/25/2016) "A Safe Pilot Knows His Equipment"

Answer Key. Page 1 of 10

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

Engine Performance Analysis

Flying Low and Slow. (and the Tools for its Calculation) Dieter Scholz. Hamburg University of Applied Sciences

Hovercraft

A-6E Intruder USER MANUAL. Virtavia A-6E Intruder DTG Steam Edition Manual Version 2.0

European Aviation Safety Agency

ADVENT. Aim : To Develop advanced numerical tools and apply them to optimisation problems in engineering. L. F. Gonzalez. University of Sydney

See Note. 100% of rated load

Gyroplane questions from Rotorcraft Commercial Bank (From Rotorcraft questions that obviously are either gyroplane or not helicopter)

Cayenne Cayenne Tiptronic S

The following slideshow and talk were presented at the Uber Elevate Summit on April 25 th, The text included here is an approximate transcript

At all times use approved company publications and aircraft manufacturer manuals as sole reference for procedures and data!

System Normal Secondary Direct. All 3 PFC work in parallel. available. Pitch Normal Secondary Direct. Pitch maneuver command.

Analysis of JSF Prototypes

Mike Gibbons Paul Summers John Murnane

AIRCRAFT INSPECTION REPORT. For CESSNA 172 RG

Chapter 4 Lecture 16. Engine characteristics 4. Topics. Chapter IV

AIR TRACTOR, INC. OLNEY, TEXAS

Electric Flight Potential and Limitations

Chapter 4 Estimation of wing loading and thrust loading - 10 Lecture 18 Topics

PRODUCT CODE Av3 FLIGHT PLANNING EXAM 2 WORKING. by Rob Avery

ELECTRIC POWER TRAINS THE KEY ENABLER FOR CONTRA ROTATING PROPELLERS IN GENERAL AVIATION (& VICE VERSA)

Table of Contents Aircraft... 4

CHAPTER 11 ENGINE-OUT THEORY

Program Summary Model 281 Proteus

by Greg Whiley Aussie Star Flight Simulation

AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP Weight Management

SILENT SUPERSONIC TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM

Classical Aircraft Sizing II

Chapter 10 Miscellaneous topics - 2 Lecture 39 Topics

Flight Testing the ATF Prototypes. YF-23 Paul Metz (F) YF-22 Mark Shackelford (M)

See Note. 100% of rated load. Mechanical efficiency ISO3046/1 2,4,7 35.2% 34.8% 34.1% Electrical efficiency ISO3046/1 2,4,6,7 33.7% 33.4% 32.

See Note. 100% of rated load

PARALLEL INDEX DRIVES TP Series

Cessna Citation Model Stats

Dassault Falcon 50 Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Strut-Braced Wing Transonic Transport

ACTIVE STICK & THROTTLE FOR F-35. Joseph Krumenacker NAVAIR Flight Controls / JSF Vehicle Systems 16 October 2008

Retrofit Fly High & Hot. Service

The Airplane That Could!

Design of Ultralight Aircraft

See Note. 100% of rated load

See Note. 100% of rated load

AIAA Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design

OPTIMAL MISSION ANALYSIS ACCOUNTING FOR ENGINE AGING AND EMISSIONS

See Note. 100% of rated load

Introduction to the ICAO Engine Emissions Databank

Transcription:

vs Rafale

Basic hypothesis Rafale C and share the same aerodynamic configuration, means same CL (lift) and CD (drag) coefficients law [Cx(Mach, AoA)]. This is known as not realistic, but I do not have reliable data to differentiate them. Subjective position may give less Drag at high Mach number to the and better Lift at high AoA (>2) for the Rafale. M88-2 and EJ-2 share same Thrust Profile (coefficient between static thrust and actual thrust at a given altitude and Mach number configuration) under M=1.8, even mounted behind 2 very different air intake, EJ-2 thrust is assumed to decrease only after M=2.2. This is known as not realistic, but I do not have reliable data to differentiate them. Rafale C and share Fly Control limits (AoA limitation versus G factor). This is known as not realistic, but I do not have reliable data to differentiate them. Non confirmed information indicated higher AoA values allowed for the Rafale (Flight envelop of the is still not fully open)

Basic Data DASSAULT Rafale C (M88-2) Mass Control Empty Weight (lb) Internal Fuel Area Control Area (Square feet) lbs kg lbs kg 19,974 9,48 Combat Weight 25,216 11,423 1,486 4,75 (5% Fuel) sqr. Ft m2 497.99 45.72 G CAT - I CAT - III AoA Limit AoA Limit lbs/lbs.h kg/dan.h 1. 35. 2. Specic Conso (MIL Power).78.8 7. 3. 14. Specic Conso (AB) 1.67 1.7 1. 14. 14. Thust lbs kn Full AB 33,754 15 MIL 22,53 1 EADS (EJ-2) Mass Control Empty Weight (lb) Internal Fuel Area Control Area (Square feet) lbs kg lbs kg 24,283 11, Combat Weight 28,698 13, 8,83 4, (5% Fuel) sqr. Ft m2 538.7 49.4 G CAT - I CAT - III AoA Limit AoA Limit lbs/lbs.h kg/dan.h 1. 35. 2. Specic Conso (MIL Power).81.83 7. 3. 14. Specic Conso (AB) 1.73 1.76 1. 14. 14. Thust lbs kn Full AB 4,55 18 MIL 27,3 12

Full AB Thrust (lbs) 5, Thyphoon Full AB Thust 45, 4, 35, EADS (EJ-2) (lb) 3, 25, 2, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 15, 1, 5,..25.5.75 1. 1.25 1.5 1.75 2. Mach Rafale C Full AB Thust 5, 45, 4, 35, DASSAULT Rafale C (M88-2) (lb) 3, 25, 2, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 15, 1, 5,..25.5.75 1. 1.25 1.5 1.75 2. Mach

Turn Rate Diagram at Sea level with 5% internal fuel (1/2) Turn Performance at Sea level Rafale C Drag Index : / GW = 25,2 lbs Full AB Turn Performance at Sea level Drag Index : GW = 28,7 lbs Full AB 36 2G 36 2G 5G 5G 32 7G 32 7G 9G 9G -4-4 28-2 28-2 24 2 24 2 4 4 6 6 2 8 2 8 (deg / s) CAT- I Limit (deg / s) CAT- I Limit 16 16 12 12 8 8 4 4..2.4.6 Mach.8 1. 1.2 1.4..2.4.6 Mach.8 1. 1.2 1.4

Turn Rate Diagram at Sea level with 5% internal fuel (2/2) Rafale C main data for Turn performance at sea level are: Maximum Turn Rate (CAT-I AoA limit) 3. deg/s at M=.5 Maximum sustained Turn Rate (Ps=) 23.9 deg/s at M=.6 main data for Turn performance at sea level are: Maximum Turn Rate (CAT-I AoA limit) 29.33 deg/s at M=.5 Maximum sustained Turn Rate (Ps=) 23.4 deg/s at M=.6 Very small, quite un-significant, advantage to the Rafale in turn performance in such configuration. Horizontal evolution capabilities of the two planes are very similar. Rafale

Maximum Excess Specific Power with 5% internal fuel DASSAULT Rafale C (M88-2) Maximum Ps Alt (ft) CAS Mach Ps (ft/s) 592.9 918 5, 54.9 889 1, 519.95 855 15, 483.98 738 2, 466 1.5 619 25, 44 1.1 557 3, 414 1.16 492 35, 383 1.2 438 4, 339 1.2 377 45, 372 1.48 217 5, 324 1.46 86 55, 319 1.62 29 This tables show best Excess Specific Power (Ps) at 1G, it indicates mainly the initial climb rate demonstrate higher Excess Specific Power than the Rafale at all altitude (around 1% higher at sea level) in this configuration (no external loads, 5% internal fuel). Vertical evolution capabilities of the are better (1%). EADS (EJ-2) Vz Maximale Alt (ft) CAS Mach Vz (ft/s) 592.9 12 5, 553.92 981 1, 541.99 95 15, 494 1. 821 2, 487 1.9 71 25, 46 1.15 635 3, 43 1.2 566 35, 383 1.2 5 4, 339 1.2 424 45, 382 1.52 273 5, 377 1.69 13 55, 335 1.7 7 Rafale

Energy (Ps) / Mach Diagram with 5% internal fuel Energy / Mach Diagram Drag Index : GW = 28,7 lbs Full AB 6, Alt (ft) Alt (ft) 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1,..2.4.6.8 1. 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2. 2.2 Mach Energy / Mach Diagram Rafale C Drag Index : / GW = 25,2 lbs Full AB 2 4 6 8 IAS=8 2 4 6 8 IAS=8 Rafale C gross weight is less (25,2lbs) but due to extra thrust, demonstrate superior Energy (Ps) at quite all altitude and Mach giving him advantage in climb and acceleration Maximum Mach number of Rafale is 1.8 compared to Mach 2. for, mainly due to stealth characteristics of Rafale Air Intake and lack of mobile devices leading to loss of thrust for higher mach number..2.4.6.8 1. 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2. 2.2 Mach

Configuration for 45 Cruise Cruise is supposed to be at FL3 and Mach=.9, no external loads, and without after burner (fuel consumption is supposed to be the best specific one gave by engine manufacturer) Rafale C (M88-2) cruise configuration sustained with a thrust of 3,737 lbs leading to a fuel flow of 2,933 lbs/h, 45 minutes of fly in such condition require 2,2 lbs of fuel, given a gross weight of 22,175 lbs (EJ-2) cruise configuration sustained with a thrust of 4,4 lbs leading to a fuel flow of 3,289 lbs/h, 45 minutes of fly in such condition require 2,467 lbs of fuel, given a gross weight of 26,749 lbs

Turn Rate Diagram at Sea level with 45 cruise (1/2) Turn Performance at Sea level Rafale C Drag Index : / GW = 22,175 lbs Full AB Turn Performance at Sea level Drag Index : GW = 26,75 lbs Full AB 36 2G 36 2G 5G 5G 32 7G 32 7G 9G 9G -4-4 28-2 28-2 24 2 24 2 4 4 6 6 2 8 2 8 (deg / s) CAT- I Limit (deg / s) CAT- I Limit 16 16 12 12 8 8 4 4..2.4.6 Mach.8 1. 1.2 1.4..2.4.6 Mach.8 1. 1.2 1.4

Turn Rate Diagram at Sea level with with 45 cruise (2/2) Rafale C main data for Turn performance at sea level are: Maximum Turn Rate (CAT-I AoA limit) 32.1 deg/s at M=.45 (R= 895 ft) Maximum sustained Turn Rate (Ps=) 26.25 deg/s at M=.55 (R=1,34 ft) main data for Turn performance at sea level are: Maximum Turn Rate (CAT-I AoA limit) 3.2 deg/s at M=.5 (R=1,6 ft) Maximum sustained Turn Rate (Ps=) 25.1 deg/s at M=.6 (R=1,529 ft) Better Turn rate (Maximum and sustained) at lower speed (so with lower Turn radius), give to the Rafale a significant advantage in horizontal evolution in such configuration. Horizontal evolution capabilities of the Rafale are better. Rafale

Maximum Excess Specific Power with 45 cruise fuel DASSAULT Rafale C (M88-2) Vz Maximale Alt (ft) CAS Mach Vz (ft/s) 592.9 144 5, 54.9 111 1, 519.95 972 15, 483.98 839 2, 466 1.5 74 25, 44 1.1 634 3, 414 1.16 56 35, 383 1.2 498 4, 339 1.2 429 45, 31 1.2 317 5, 335 1.5 122 55, 334 1.69 59 EADS (EJ-2) Vz Maximale Alt (ft) CAS Mach Vz (ft/s) 592.9 195 5, 553.92 153 1, 541.99 119 15, 494 1. 881 2, 487 1.9 752 25, 46 1.15 681 3, 43 1.2 67 35, 383 1.2 537 4, 339 1.2 459 45, 368 1.47 31 5, 37 1.66 153 55, 335 1.7 89 This tables show best Excess Specific Power (Ps) at 1G, it indicates mainly the initial climb rate and vertical evolution capability in dogfight. still demonstrate higher Excess Specific Power than the Rafale at all altitude (around 5% higher at sea level) but advantage is lower in this configuration. Vertical evolution capabilities of the are better (5%). Rafale