Presentation Outline. # Title

Similar documents
Presentation Outline. # Title # Title

FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS

CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry

Critical Design Review

NASA SL - NU FRONTIERS. PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel

Overview. Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management

Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch March 30, 2016

Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES

Auburn University. Project Wall-Eagle FRR

Flight Readiness Review

Jordan High School Rocketry Team. A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device

NASA USLI PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW. University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team

NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013. University of Minnesota: USLI CDR 1

Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum

CRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION

GIT LIT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER 13TH, 2017

Project NOVA

NUMAV. AIAA at Northeastern University

Auburn University Student Launch. PDR Presentation November 16, 2015

Florida A & M University. Flight Readiness Review. 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review

Flight Readiness Review March 16, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

Preliminary Design Review. California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017

Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight. Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch.

The University of Toledo

University Student Launch Initiative

NASA SL Critical Design Review

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017

Critical Design Review Report

Team Air Mail Preliminary Design Review

Preliminary Design Review. Cyclone Student Launch Initiative

University Student Launch Initiative

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review

NASA SL Flight Readiness Review

University of Notre Dame

Notre Dame Rocketry Team. Flight Readiness Review March 8, :00 PM CST

Critical Design Review

Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review

NASA s Student Launch Initiative :

UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation. Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

USLI Critical Design Report

Presentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix

Wichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S.

Pegasus II. Tripoli Level 3 Project Documentation. Brian Wheeler

Illinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014

Critical Design Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

Preliminary Design Review

NASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS)

Critical Design Review

Tripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt

Flight Readiness Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)

Preliminary Design Review November 15, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768

Tuskegee University Rocketry Club

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review

Student Launch. Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken

NASA Student Launch W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA Artemis. Deployable Rover. November 3rd, Preliminary Design Review

NASA Student Launch College and University. Preliminary Design Review

SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle

USLI Flight Readiness Review

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL CDR

Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review

Critical Design Review

NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW

AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH. Project Nova. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL Post Launch Assessment Review

THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON

LEVEL 3 BUILD YELLOW BIRD. Dan Schwartz

Post Launch Assessment Review

The University of Toledo

Madison West High School Green Team

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Critical Design Review

Project WALL-Eagle Maxi-Mav Flight Readiness Review

Student Launch. Enclosed: Proposal. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken. Submission Date: September 30, 2016

Cornell Rocketry Team. NASA Student Launch Competition CORNELL ROCKETRY TEAM

Pre-Flight Checklist for SLIPSTICK III

DemoSat-B User s Guide

Rocket Design. Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick. February 2010

NASA SL Preliminary Design Review

CNY Rocket Team Challenge. Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge

First Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016

Rover Delivery NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review. Charger Rocket Works.

AKRONAUTS. P o s t - L a u n c h A ss e s m e n t R e v i e w. The University of Akron College of Engineering. Akron, OH 44325

By: Georgia Institute of Technology Team Autonomous Rocket Equipment System (A.R.E.S.) Georgia Institute of Technology North Avenue NW Atlanta GA,

267 Snell Engineering Northeastern University Boston, MA 02115

University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review

Electronic Deployment

Innovating the future of disaster relief

Pre-Launch Procedures

HPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick

Cal Poly Pomona Rocketry NASA Student Launch Competition POST LAUNCH ASSESMENT REVIEW April 24, 2017

Michigan Aeronautical Science Association

Figure 1 - Members of CRT at Competition

UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry NASA Student Launch Proposal Project Arktos. 432 Eshleman Hall, MC 4500 Berkeley, CA

Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati

York College of Pennsylvania NASA Student Launch Preliminary Design Report

NASA University Student Launch Initiative (Sensor Payload) Final Design Review. Payload Name: G.A.M.B.L.S.

CHAPTER 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

SSC Swedish Space Corporation

Skill Level 3 Average Skills Needed. Made In USA. Kit #04997 Skill Level 4. Zephyr Parts List

ISS Space Grant Team Exocoetidae

Transcription:

FRR Presentation 1

Presentation Outline # Title 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Team Introduction Mission Summary Vehicle Overview Vehicle Dimensions Upper Body Section Elliptical Nose Cone Ballast System Payload Housing Structure Booster Section Fins Motor Description Static Stability Margin Mass Statement Recovery System Overview Recovery System Components Recovery Electronics Descent Rates Kinetic Energy Summary Predicted Altitude Landing Radius Testing Overview Test Plans and Procedures 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Structure Tests Full-Scale Flight Tests March 14, 2013 March 15, 2013 Recovery Tests Structure Requirements Verification SMD Payload Design ADGS ADGS Ground Station ARTCOS Electrical Block Diagram UV Sensor Accuracy Full-Scale Flight Data Full Scale Launch ARTCOS Pictures Payload Integration Interfaces Payload Requirements Verification Public Outreach Progress Educational Outreach Science Olympiad Questions 2

Team Introduction Team Manager Dustin Neighbors Lead Enigineer Jake Educational Outreach Janci Structure Todd Electronics Hardware Billy Electronics Software John Historian Jade Taylor Bert Bert Recovery Amber Billy Safety Blake 3

Mission Summary Science Mission Directorate Payload Vehicle Recovery 4

Vehicle Overview 5

Vehicle Dimensions Total Length: 97.5 in Upper Airframe Section: 36.5 in Acrylic Payload Section: 27 in Booster Section: 33 in Outer Diameter: 5.525 in 6

Upper Body Section Dimensions: 36.5 in long 0.075 in thick (airframe and nosecone) 7

Elliptical Nose Cone Dimensions 8.5 in long 4.6 in shoulder Material Fiberglass 8

Ballast System Washers Bulkheads Apogee Control 9

Payload Housing Structure Dimensions 27 inches long 0.125 inches thick Material Clear Acrylic 10

Booster Section Dimensions 33 in long 0.075 in wall thickness Materials Fiberglass 11

Fins Dimension Root Chord 12 in Tip Chord 2.4 inches Height 4 inches Sweep Length 7.85 inches Sweep Angle 63 Degrees 12

Motor Description Cesaroni L1720-WT-P 2.95 in diameter 2.15 second burn time 10.9:1 thrust-to-weight ratio Rail Exit Velocity 81.5 ft/s Total impulse of 831 lb f s (3695.6 N s) 656 ft/s max velocity 13

Static Stability Margin Center of Gravity 56.83 inches from the tip of the nose Center of Pressure 66.03 inches from the tip of the nose Stability margin 9.20 inches or 1.67 calibers of body width 14

Mass Statement Mass Summary Section Mass (oz) Mass (lb) Upper Body 148.99 9.31 Payload Housing 186.69 11.67 Booster 238.22 14.89 Total Mass (Launch) 573.90 35.87 Total Mass (Apogee) 570.03 32.00 15

Recovery System Overview 16

Recovery System Components Material 1.9 oz. silicone-coated, reinforced cross-form, rip stop nylon Main Parachute 10 ft diameter Four 10 ft long 0.625 in wide tubular woven nylon shroud lines 40 ft long 0.375 in wide tubular Kevlar shock cord Kevlar TAC-9B Bag deployment bag Drogue Parachute 2 ft diameter Four 2 ft long 0.25 in wide tubular woven nylon shroud lines 20 ft long 0.375 in wide tubular Kevlar shock cord Nomex blanket for protection 17

Recovery Electronics Altimeter System Aluminum flashing Featherweight magnetic arming switch Primary & Secondary PerfectFlite Stratologger SL100 Power One 9-volt battery GPS System Transmitter Garmin Astro DC40 Handheld Receiver Garmin Astro 320 18

Descent Rates Parachute Descent Rate Parachute Size Main 9.95 ft/s 10 ft Diameter Drogue 83.14 ft/s 2 ft Diameter 19

Kinetic Energy Summary Phase Nose Cone and Upper Body Airframe Payload Booster Apogee to Main Deployment (maximum) Main Deployment to Landing (maximum) 1026.11 ft lbf 1252.58 ft lbf 1182.81 ft lbf 14.7 ft lbf 17.94 ft lbf 16.94 ft lbf 20

Predicted Altitude Wind (mph) Ballast Needed (oz) Simulated Apogee Altitude (ft) 0 10 5279 5 9 5274 10 7 5283 15 4 5277 20 0 5289 21

Landing Radius Wind (mph) Drift (ft) 0 7 5 560 10 1316 15 1908 20 2682 22

Testing Overview 23

Test Plans and Procedures Static Performance Testing Subscale Flights Full-Scale Flights Pre-Launch Checklists Post-Flight Checklists Timed Assemblies Failure Analysis 24

Structure Tests Component Test Date Description Procedure Success Epoxy Hydraulic Press 12/28/2012 Bulkhead epoxied into airframe then pressed Hydraulic press applied force against epoxied attachment Yes; epoxy maxed out the scale at 1500 lbs Fiberglass Bulkhead Strength Hydraulic Press 12/28/2012 Bulkhead was placed under incrementing force Hydraulic press pressed on a block measuring 2-in x 3- in Yes; bulkhead maxed out the scale at 1500 lbs or 250 psi Airframe Testing (Fiberglass and Acrylic) Hydraulic Press 1/4/2013 Airframes were subjected to axial force Hydraulic press pressed on the center of a steel sheet across the circumference of the acrylic and fiberglass airframes Yes; both withstood 1500 pound shock force, and one minute of constant 1500 pound force Fin Test Hydraulic Press 1/5/2013 Eye Bolt Test Test Launch 1/7/2013 Torque applied to fins until compromised Drogue parachute attached to eye bolt in place of u-bolt Fin mount was placed under the hydraulic press and force applied to create torque Prototype vehicle was launched using a custom L667 Yes; fins withstood a maximum of 550 inlbf of torque Yes; eye bolt survived the flight 25

Vehicle Requirements Verification SOW Vehicle Requirement Satisfying Design Feature Verification Method 1.1 Payload to One Mile Cessaroni L1720-WT Testing, Analysis 1.2 Official Scoring Altimeter Adept A1E, included in the SMD payload Inspection 1.3 Remain Subsonic Cesaroni L1720-WT Testing, Analysis 1.4 Recoverable and Reusable Successful recovery system 1.5 Maximum of Four Independent Sections 1.6 Prepared at Launch Site within 2 Hours 1.7 Remain Launch-Ready for a Minimum of One Hour 1.8 8 feet long 1 inch rail (1010) or 1.5 inch (1515) Vehicle is composed of 3 tethered sections Launch operations and assembly procedures System runtime capability of at least 2 hours 1010 and 1515 rail buttons attached to vehicle body Testing, Inspection, Analysis Inspection Testing, Inspection Testing, Inspection, Analysis Inspection 1.9 Launched by a Standard 12 volt DC Firing System Cesaroni L1720-WT Igniter Testing 1.10 No External Circuitry or Special Equipment to Initiate Launch Motor ignition only requires the 12V DC firing system Inspection 1.11 Use a Commercially Available, Certified APCP Motor Cesaroni L1720-WT Inspection 1.12 Total Impulse will not Exceed 5,120 Newton-seconds Motor total impulse of 3695.6 N-s Inspection 1.15 The full scale vehicle, in final flight configuration, must be successfully launched and recovered prior to FRR Full Scale Test Launch Testing 26

Full-Scale Flight Tests 27

March 14, 2013 Location Hunewell Ranch, 32.2N, -98.2E, 1309MSL Launch Rod 1010 Wind Speed 15 mph Wind SSW Direction Temperature 75 F Pressure 30.21 inhg Component Apogee Time to Apogee Time of Flight Drogue Raven 3 Corrupted Data Corrupted Data Corrupted Data Drogue Stratologger 4947ft AGL 18.40 s 97.30 s Main Raven 3 Corrupted Data Corrupted Data Corrupted Data Main Stratologger 4935ft AGL 18.95 s Corrupted Data GPS 4977ft AGL 45.00 s 120.00 s 28

March 15, 2013 Location Launch Rod Wind Speed Wind Direction Temperature Pressure Hunewell Ranch, 32.2N, - 98.2E, 1309MSL 10 foot, button 19 mph SSW 80 F 33.2 inhg Component Apogee Time to Apogee Time of Flight Drogue Raven 3 5255ft AGL 18.96s 72.68s Drogue Stratologger 5282ft AGL 19.60s 73.10s Main Raven 3 5207ft AGL 18.72s 72.68s Main Stratologger 5269ft AGL 19.65s 74.90s GPS Corrupted Data Corrupted Data Corrupted Data 29

Recovery Tests Date Overview Predicted Apogee 26 January 2013 14 February 2013 19 February 2013 7 March 2013 12 March 2013 Hunewell, L585, Prototype 1 Hunewell, L585, Prototype 1 Hunewell, L585, Prototype 1 Hunewell, K510, Prototype 1 Hunewell, K555, Prototype 1 Apogee (Average) Landing Radius 3525ft AGL 3495ft AGL 180ft Yes 3324ft AGL 2957ft AGL 2067ft No 2611ft AGL 2300ft AGL 240ft Yes 2429ft AGL 1856ft AGL 363ft Yes 2358ft AGL 1888ft AGL 1860ft No Success 30

SMD Payload 31

Design 32

ADGS 33

ADGS Ground Station 34

ARTCOS 35

Electrical Block Diagram 36

UV Sensor Accuracy 37

0 10 19 29 38 48 57 67 76 86 96 105 114 124 134 143 153 163 172 Full Scale Flight Data 30 28 26 24 22 20 Pressure (inhg) 0 50 100 150 200 dtime (s) 93 92.5 92 91.5 91 90.5 90 Temperature ( o F) dtime (s) 800 600 400 200 0 Solar Irradiance (W/m 2 ) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 dtime (s) GPS 38

Full Scale Launch ARTCOS Pictures 39

Payload Integration 40

Interfaces Airframe Couplers Rail Buttons Magnetic Switches Electrical Ignition System Telemetry 41

Payload Requirement Verification SOW # Requirement Satisfying Design Feature Verification Method 3.1.3.1 3.1.3.2 3.1.3.4 3.1.3.5 3.1.3.6 3.1.3.7 3.1.3.9 UV Radiation Solar Irradiance Humidity Temperature Pressure SU-100 TSL2561, SP-110 HIH4030 BMP180 BMP180 Lab Testing, Static and Flight Testing, Analysis, Demonstration Data Collection Frequency 16MHz Arduino Mega 2560, Software Lab Testing, Flight Testing, Analysis Post-Landing Data Termination Software 2 Descent Pictures VC0706, Keyfob Video Camera 3 Landing Pictures VC0706, Keyfob Video Camera Lab Testing, Analysis Static and Flight Testing Horizon Orientation ARTCOS Lab Testing, Analysis Onboard Data Storage Micro SD Lab Testing, Static and Flight Testing, Analysis Data Transmission 900MHz XBee Radios Range Testing, Flight Testing GPS LS20031 Lab Testing, Static and Flight Testing, Analysis 42

Public Outreach Progress 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 43

44

Science Olympiad 45

Questions 46