Pollution from ships in Copenhagen Port and the effect on city air quality

Similar documents
Air Pollution Levels at Copenhagen Airport estimated by measurements and Nested Regional Eulerian, Local Gaussian Plume and CFD Models

The Voice of International Merchant Shipping

3.1 Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO): as defined in Rule 1020 (Definitions).

RESEARCH ON INFLUENCE OF SELECTED FAILURES ON THE EXHAUST GAS CONTENT OF SHIP DIESEL ENGINE WORKING ON HEAVY FUEL OIL

Past, Present-day and Future Ship Emissions

3. Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in 2009

RULE 4352 SOLID FUEL FIRED BOILERS, STEAM GENERATORS AND PROCESS HEATERS (Adopted September 14, 1994; Amended October 19, 1995; Amended May 18, 2006)

Cost-benefit analysis of using 0.5% marine heavy fuel oil in European sea areas

SIHARBOR: The shore connection system for berthed ships

LNG: Legal and regulatory framework. Canepa Monica World Maritime University

SIHARBOR: The shore connection system for berthed ships Shore-side power supply for eco-friendly ports

Monitoring, Reporting and Reducing Air Emissions from Marine Operations. Till Stoeckenius, ENVIRON Int. Corp. GreenTech June St.

Marine Emission Inventory Tool

Enforcement - the way to cleaner shipping and a fair business

Marin gas logistics. Work package 5. D5-5 Environmental studies - assessment of air emissions in terminal ports

Appendix A.1 Calculations of Engine Exhaust Gas Composition...9

CIVITAS SMILE Introduction of a Low Emission Zone in Norwich. Andy Watt Head of City Development Services

Low Emission Zones in Germany

Cost-effective ship NOx control

DAYTIME AND NIGHTTIME AGING OF LOGWOOD COMBUSTION AEROSOLS

Lean and clean dredging for a better future

Methodologies for emission inventories for shipping. Jana Moldanová IVL, Swedish Environmental Research Institute

Emission control at marine terminals

Impact of Transportation Emissions on New Jersey s Air Quality

Some Comments on Air Quality Nitrogen Oxide

PM 2.5 Impacts From Ship Emissions in the Pacific Northwest. Robert Kotchenruther Ph.D. EPA Region 10 NW-AIRQUEST Meeting, June

Heavy Metal Emissions from Danish Road Transport

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HEALTH BENEFITS OF LOW SULPHUR FUELS. Alinafe Mkavea Director Fuels and Gas Malawi Energy Regulatory Authority

EU Ship Emissions Time to Act. Bill Hemmings Transport and Environment

Zorik Pirveysian, Air Quality Policy and Management Division Manager Policy and Planning Department

State of the Art (SOTA) Manual for Internal Combustion Engines

This presentation has been produced in the context of a seminar/conference organized with the assistance of the

Going the Dual Fuel Route

Enforcement of the North European SECA (and NECA)

Remote measurements of gas and particle emissions to air from ships in open sea and harbors

Air quality at Heathrow Airport

Air Pollution in the Santa Barbara Channel

Deriving Background Concentrations of NOx and NO 2 April 2016 Update

Reducing Workboat & Rail Emissions in Ports with Clean Diesel Technology

Creating a zero-emissions shipping world

This rule shall apply to any stationary source which is a major source of regulated air pollutants or of hazardous air pollutants.

APPLICATION OF MARPOL 73/78 ANNEX VI TO EXISTING SHIPS

CANADA / US EMISSION CONTROL AREA (ECA) FOR SHIPS. Consultation Presentation Vancouver, Ottawa, Halifax Environment and Transport Canada January 2009

Blue ocean green future

RESOLUTION A.719(17) adopted on 6 November 1991 PREVENTION OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS

Air quality aspects of shipping in the south-western Baltic Sea region

Maritime emissions IMO discussions

Summary of Findings. Summary of Findings

ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM

Background, structure and objectives of the EffShip project

MARAMA 2015 SCIENCE MEETING JULY 29-30, 2015 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

The effect of particle filters on HDV in Denmark

Alternative Fuel Vehicle Program and Garbage Trucks

Regelverk for miljøteknologi

Carbon footprint report 2017

RULE STATIONARY GAS TURBINES Adopted (Amended , ) INDEX

APPENDIX 6A. Air Quality Monitoring Results

Looking ahead to tier 4

Estimated PM2.5 Emissions from Port Operations in Philadelphia

Emissions Legislation

AIR QUALITY PERMIT. 7 Foundation Drive Savannah, Georgia (Chatham County)

Nanoparticle emissions from LNG and other low sulfur marine fuels

The fuel of the future...available today. Clean, Abundant, American NATURAL GAS

Recent and current developments in the regulation of air pollution from ships

CEE 452/652. Week 6, Lecture 1 Mobile Sources. Dr. Dave DuBois Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute

New Zealand s potential accession to International Maritime Organization treaty: MARPOL Annex VI: Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships

CLEANER SHIPPING. Focus on air pollution, technical solutions and regulation

Political Forum. ClassNK s perspective on regulatory developments Low sulphur fuels & Ship digitalization

A Regional Look at the Inventories

IFO 380 HEAVY FUEL OIL Vessel using Xbee Natural Fuel Additive

Air Quality Benefits from Tier 3 Low Sulfur Gasoline Program Arthur Marin, NESCAUM

MARINTEK The Norwegian Marine Technology Research Institute

Agreement with Enbridge for the Installation of Compressed Natural Gas Refuelling Stations at City Facilities

Imad El Haddad Paul Scherrer Institut Zurich, 30 June 2015

Monitoring Air Emissions on Ships. Restricted Siemens AG 2014 All rights reserved.

Application of EMME3 and Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) for Estimation of Zonal Time Varying Population Density Distribution in

The price of sulphur reductions in the Baltic Sea and North Sea shipping

Marine Environmental Protection Committee IMO MEPC 62 July 2011

AMBER M. KLESGES BOARD SECRETARY. No.\w-Tm

The Need to Reduce Marine Shipping Emissions

Ammonia measurement challenges in SCR units

Regulation No. 3 Changes For Internal Combustion Engines. Christine Hoefler November 14, 2012

Global Management and Requirements to Reduce Pollution from Ships Especially in SECA Area

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONTHLY REPORT

1. Procedure Composition of Kerosene Atmospheric processes Incidents Emergency procedure 6. 6.

There Are No Shortcuts to Compliance

Mobile Source Committee Update

Regulatory Announcement

Emission reduction in port with Cold Ironing: Italy national case study

FOR EVERYONE. and new-source performance standards that strictly regulated emissions of a new source (e.g., automobiles, factories) entering an area.

California Environmental Protection Agency. Air Resources Board. Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) Update 2015 CRC LCA of Transportation Fuels Workshop

Catalytic Coatings for Diesel Particulate Filter Regeneration

The road leading to the 0.50% sulphur limit and IMO s role moving forward

Regulatory Impacts of Biogas-fired Internal Combustion Engines

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF LOCAL AIR QUALITY CHARGES. Roger Roy Director General, Economic Analysis Transport Canada

Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Boilers at Area Source Facilities (Boiler GACT) Final Reconsidered Rule Requirements Summary

Looking ahead to TIER 4

Vapor Recovery Developments in Emission Standards and Applications

Transcription:

June 4, 2014 Pollution from ships in Copenhagen Port and the effect on city air quality Helge Rørdam Olesen DCE Danish Centre for Environment and Energy Department of Environmental Science With input from many colleagues at Aarhus University, in particular - Thomas Ellermann - Morten Winther - Jørgen Brandt - Jesper Christensen UNI VERSITET

Overview Setting the scene Air pollutants from ships Pollution from ships in the seas around Denmark Pollution from ships in the port of Copenhagen Detailed study on docking cruise ships from 2004 Further studies on docking ships Summary Pollution in Copenhagen Port Helge Rørdam Olesen. June 4, 2014

Air pollutants from ships Particles (primary and secondary) Sulphur dioxide (SO 2 ) Nitrogen oxides (NO + NO 2 ), i.e. NO x Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Carbon dioxide (CO 2 )

The largest health-related air pollution problem: Particles

Where do particles in the air outside Christiansborg come from?

Particles AARHUS UNIVERSITY A distinction is made between Primary particles Secondary particles

Important point about particles When measuring particle pollution in the air, only a relatively small fraction of the particles have been born as particles. These are primary particles. Gases in particular NO x and SO 2 can be transformed to particles through chemical and physical reactions in the atmosphere. They form secondary particles. These reactions require time (several hours or days). Therefore, a high proportion of the particles we find in the air have their origin far away.

The role of ships Ships are important contributors to both primary and secondary particles.

Ships and sulphur pollution Fuel for ships contains sulphur. Sulphur in fuel leads to formation of primary particles and SO 2 (a gas). Later, SO 2 leads to formation of secondary particles. The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) has agreed on a set of rules for sulphur content.

Sulphur content (%) AARHUS UNIVERSITY Limits to sulphur content in heavy fuel 5 4 Non-SECA General limit 3 2 1 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Sulphur content (%) AARHUS UNIVERSITY Limits to sulphur content in heavy fuel 5 4 Non-SECA General limit 3 2 Sulphur Emission Control Area (Baltic and North Sea) EU Ports: 1 Only 0.1 % sulphur from January 1, 2010 SECA 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Nitrogen oxides NO x is the sum of NO and NO 2. It is generated in combustion processes. The major part is emitted as NO. NO 2 is harmful to health. NO is not. NO can be transformed to NO 2 in chemical reactions. Some reactions are fast, others require many hours. Fast transformation requires the presence of ozone. Thus, the NO 2 concentration level is of concern Further, NO and NO 2 both contribute to formation of particles.

Limits to NO x emissions IMO has agreed to a set of regulations applying everywhere. Further, it was expected that a Nitrogen Emission Control Area (NECA) would be implemented in the Baltic Sea from 2016. The implementation of NECA has been postponed. This would mean that for new ships from 2016 onwards, NO x emissions would be reduced by 80% compared to ships built before 2011. In some subsequent calculations we have assumed a NECA area to be implemented.

Pollution from ships in seas around Denmark Report from 2009 Google: ship emissions Denmark

Steps to estimate ship contribution to concentrations 1. Compile an emission inventory 2. Make calculations of concentrations with an atmospheric dispersion model, accounting for transport and conversion of pollutants. 3. How much can be attributed to ships? Estimated by comparing model runs with full emission from ships and model runs with reduced emission from ships.

Emission inventory for SO 2 from ships based on AIS data. 2007 situation. Ton SO 2 per year per km 2

Atmospheric model: The Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model (DEHM) 3D chemical transport model Long range transport of air pollution on the Northern hemisphere Grids of calculation points. Horizontal resolution: - 150 km x 150 km - 50 km x 50 km - 17 km x 17 km - 6 km x 6 km

Study from 2009: Main assumptions for scenarios The ship traffic in 2011 is assumed equal to traffic in 2007 due to the financial crisis The traffic of goods carrying vessels is assumed to increase by 3.5 % annually until 2020. A NECA area is implemented in 2016 For 2020: Land-based sources based on a scenario set up by the International Institute for Applied System Analysis in Vienna ( Central case ). Involves a reduction in NOx emission which has not taken place.

Results in terms of concentrations

SO 2 : Model calculations for 2007 og 2020 All sources, both landbased and ships. Concentration of SO 2 in µg/m 3 2007 2020 2,50 < 2,25-2,50 2,00-2,25 1,75-2,00 1,50-1,75 1,25-1,50 1.00-1,25 0,75-1,00 0,50-0,75 < 0,50

NO 2 : Model calculations for 2007 og 2020 Koncentration af NO 2 in µg/m 3 2007 2020 > 10 9-10 8-9 7-8 6-7 5-6 4 5 3-4 2 3 < 2

Particle pollution limitation in calculations With the DEHM model we can describe primary particles secondary inorganic particles but not secondary organic particles We use the designation mpm 2.5 (modelled PM 2.5 ) for the particles.

Model calculations for 2007 and 2020 Concentration of mpm 2.5, µg/m 3 (mpm 2.5 : modelled PM 2.5 ) 2007 2020 > 7.5 7.0-7.5 6.5 7.0 6.0 6.5 5.5 6.0 5.0 5.5 4.5 5.0 4.0 4.5 3.5 4.0 < 3.5

Trend in air quality in Denmark towards 2020 average over land area Koncentration, µg/m 3 7,0 6,0 5,0 Andre kilder Skibe Gennemsnit for Danmark 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0 0,0 2007 2020 2007 2020 2007 2020 SO2 NO2 mpm2.5 Average concentration over Danish land areas

% from ship emissions AARHUS UNIVERSITY Relative contribution (percent) from ships to concentration levels (average over Danish area) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2007 2011 2020 SO2 NO2 mpm2.5

Summary until now... On Danish national scale emissions from ships give a significant contribution to air pollution levels for: Sulphur dioxide Nitrogen oxides Fine particles For instance, in the Danish rural districts ship traffic is responsible for around 20% of NO 2 concentrations in the air.

Pollution from ships in the port of Copenhagen

Available studies concerning ports (1) Pollution from docking cruise ships in Copenhagen. 2004 emission data. Environmental Project 978, 2005 for the Danish EPA. Chapter in report from 2009. 2008 emission data. No explicit concentration calculations, but emission data for both Copenhagen and Aarhus. Data are adjusted to reflect sulphur regulations for ports introduced 2010. Environmental Project 1306, 2009 for the Danish EPA

Available studies concerning ports (2) Study conducted 2007 to investigate interaction between planned cruise ship terminals and future residential areas. Unpublished. Study concerning planned high rise buildings (ca. 100 m tall) at Marmormolen and Langelinie.

Available studies features and limitations The studies have very detailed emission inventories, especially for cruise ships. However some years old. No recent, detailed emission data have been compiled. Emissions are based on the assumption that engines run in normal operation at a certain fraction of full load. We do not take account of any transient bursts of pollution during start of engines.

Results from the most detailed study: Pollution from cruise ships based on 2004 data.

Cruise ship quays in Copenhagen (2004)

Nox (kg) AARHUS UNIVERSITY NOx emission at each quay (entire season) Nox-emission for hele sæsonen 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 154 156 166 177 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 245 252 254 Kaj

NO 2 concentration as yearly average (2004 data) NO 2 has a background level of approximately 23 µg/m 3. The level is increased by 0.8 µg/m 3, where the contribution is largest (600 meter East of Langelinie). The limit value is 40 µg/m 3. The small increase may appear surprising because ships are large NO X emitters. However, chemistry is involved. The amount of available ozone in the background air sets a kind of ceiling : It limits the amount of NO that can be converted to NO 2. (This applies only as long as we consider local scale)

PM 2.5 concentration as yearly average (2004 data) PM 2.5 is increased locally close to cruise ships by 0.035 µg/m 3 (background level ca. 15 µg/m 3 ). The limit value is 25 µg/m 3. Note: The relative contribution is small, but any contribution of PM 2.5 has a negative health effect. No account is taken of special conditions during engine start

SO 2 concentration as yearly average (2004 data) SO 2 was increased locally close to cruise ships by 1.5 µg/m 3. The background level was around 5 µg/m 3 in 2004. Note: Due to sulphur regulations in port, beginning in 2010, a 16 times reduction could be expected.

NOx, docking (t) AARHUS UNIVERSITY Various ship types and development over time NO X emissions (docking) according to report from 2009. 200 180 160 Cruise ships in 2004 as just discussed 140 120 100 80 2001 2010 2004 60 40 20 0 Tankers Other bulk carriers Container ships Ferries Cruise liners

NOx emissions from ships in Copenhagen Port compared to other sources. 373 ton in 2010 from all ships (docking & manoeuvring) Of these: 200 ton from cruise ships (docking & manoeuvring) 7.760 t from all ships in Øresund 568 ton from Amagerværket i 2008 19.000 t from all road traffic in the greater Copenhagen area

Cruise ship calls in Copenhagen Port 2004: 259 calls in Copenhagen port 2008: 295 calls in Copenhagen Port 2013: 347 calls in Copenhagen (10 in Malmø)

Study conducted 2007: 2010 and 2017 scenarios Will there be a conflict between more cruise ships and planned new residential areas?

We now focus on an area to the North, 2000 x 2000m Various scenarios are considered.

We now focus on an area to the North, 2000 x 2000m Various scenarios are considered.

Limit value for NO 2 The hourly concentration of NO 2 is allowed to exceed 200 microgrammes/m 3 no more than 18 times a year. Therefore, the 19th largest value is of interest: Is it larger than 200?

Scenario with very high frequency of call of relatively large cruise ships Calculations for NO 2 We consider the 19 th highest hourly concentration at various heights

Scenario with very high frequency of call of relatively large ships At a height of 1.5 m there are no problems in complying with the limit value. At a height of 20 m also no problem

Receptors at 30 m level NO2 calculation. Each square is 50 x 50 m. Very local problems at a height of 30 m.

Receptors at 40 m level

Receptors at 50 m level

Receptors at 60 m level

Receptors at 80 m level

Lesson to be learned For high rise buildings close to quays with high activity level there is a potential for violations of NO 2 limit values, depending on the precise conditions regarding emissions, stack height and building geometry.

Summary (1) On Danish national scale emissions from ships in seas around Denmark give a significant contribution to air pollution concentration levels for: Sulphur dioxide Nitrogen oxides Fine particles For instance, in the Danish rural districts ship traffic is responsible for around 20% of NO 2 concentrations in the air.

Summary (2) There is a major effect of IMO regulations concerning sulphur. The regulations lead to a large decrease in SO 2 concentrations. Ships are an important contributor to both primary and secondary particles.

Summary (3) Docking cruise ships is a considerable source to NO x emissions in Copenhagen. Cruise ships (2008 data) are responsible for 55% of the total emissions of NO x from ships in Copenhagen Port. Cruise ships do not cause any exceedances of limit values for NO 2 concentrations at ground level close to the ships. For high rise buildings close to quays with high activity level there is a potential for violations of NO 2 limit values, depending on the precise conditions regarding emissions, stack height and building geometry.

Summary (4) The detailed study for docking cruise ships showed a local increase of PM 2.5 by 0.035 µg/m 3 (background level ca. 15 µg/m 3 ). The relative contribution is small, but any contribution to PM 2.5 concentrations has a negative health effect. Thank you!